More Related Content Similar to Hyphenating Convergence Chromatography with UV and MS Detection for Compositional, Impurity and Degradation Analysis of High Performance Electronic Materials (20) More from Waters Corporation - Chemical Materials (11) Hyphenating Convergence Chromatography with UV and MS Detection for Compositional, Impurity and Degradation Analysis of High Performance Electronic Materials1. ©2014 Waters Corporation 1
Hyphenating Convergence Chromatography
with UV and MS Detection for Compositional,
Impurity and Degradation Analysis of High
Performance Electronic Materials
Jane Cooper
Tue 20th May, 2014
[Click Here] - Link to Poster
2. ©2014 Waters Corporation 2
Introduction
Background information about Liquid Crystals
Current Analytical Methods
Convergence Chromatography (UPC2)
Examples:
o Impurity and degradation analysis
o Compositional analysis
Interfacing UPC2 with MS detection
3. ©2014 Waters Corporation 3
Background - Liquid Crystals
Properties:
o Some properties of liquids:
• Flow, pour like liquids and take the shape of containers
o Some optical properties of solids:
• Birefringence
• Optical activity
o React predictably to an electric current, enabling the control of
light passage
Liquid crystal intermediates:
o Building block compounds used to prepare liquid crystals
• Used in mixtures (10 to 20 singles used in a typical mixture)
4. ©2014 Waters Corporation 4
Background - Liquid Crystals
A twisted nematic cell
In the “off” state, in the absence of an electric field, the assembly is transparent to light.
In the “on” state, an applied field destroys the twist of the nematic, rendering the assembly opaque.
Credit: Encyclopedia Britannica. Inc.
5. ©2014 Waters Corporation 5
Background - Liquid Crystals
Uses:
o Electronic displays:
• Watches, calculators, notebooks, mobile phones, projectors,
desktops monitors / TVs, viewfinders on cameras /
camcorders…..
6. ©2014 Waters Corporation 6
Current Analytical Methods
Existing methods used to characterize liquid crystal intermediate
compounds:
• Differential Scanning Calorimetry
• Fourier Transform Infrared
• Raman Spectroscopy
• Ultraviolet Absorption Spectrophotometry
• Optical Microscopy
– For the impurity profiling and compositional analysis typically a
chromatographic technique would be used:
• HPLC with UV detection
• HPLC with MS detection
• GC with MS detection
7. ©2014 Waters Corporation 7
Current Analytical Methods
– These techniques have some limitations:
• The compounds might not be thermally stable and / or volatile
• Limited sample availability
• The sample solubility might be incompatible with the solvent
required for the technique
• Therefore requiring additional sample preparation stages
• Long analysis times with insufficient selectivity and sensitivity
8. ©2014 Waters Corporation 8
Convergence Chromatography (UPC2)
Convergence Chromatography (CC)
is a normal phase separation
technique
– Uses carbon dioxide as the primary
mobile phase
– Choice of adding an co-solvent such
as methanol or acetonitrile
The Waters UltraPerformance
Convergence Chromatography
(UPC2) builds upon the potential of
CC while using proven and robust
Waters UPLC technology.
[Click Here] for detailed product Info
9. ©2014 Waters Corporation 9
Convergence Chromatography (UPC2)
Many liquid crystal intermediate compounds:
– Are not very stable at high temperatures
– Have low volatility
– Have similar UV spectra
Therefore, utilizing the separation powers of UPC2 with CO2 as
the mobile phase is an ideal alternative to both HPLC and GC
analysis
10. ©2014 Waters Corporation 10
UPC2 Examples
Impurity Profiling Analysis
– Impurities can be present due to many factors, including
contamination, as by-products, or as degradation products
– Purity is critical to ensure the optimum quality, performance
and lifetime of the electronic display device
Compositional Analysis
– Composition is critical to ensure physical properties and
characteristic of the liquid crystal.
o Even just small changes can have pronounced effects
11. ©2014 Waters Corporation 11
Liquid Crystal Intermediate Compounds
4-(Octyloxy)benzoic acid
4-Butoxybenzoic acid
4-Cyanobenzoic acid
4,4′-Azoxyanisole-d14
(internal standard)
4-Butylbenzoic acid
4-Octylbenzoic acid
12. ©2014 Waters Corporation 12
Methods
UPC2 conditions
CCM back pressure: 2000 psi
Sample temp.: 20 oC
Column temp.: 50 oC
Injection volume: 1 µL
Column: ACQUITY UPC2 CSH Fluoro-phenyl, 3.0 mm
x 100 mm, 1.7 µm
Mobile phase A: CO2
Mobile phase B: Methanol (2% Formic Acid +
15 mM ammonium acetate)
PDA conditions
UV system: ACQUITY UPC2 PDA Detector
Range : 210 to 450 nm
Resolution: 1.2 nm
Sampling rate: 20 pts/sec
Filter time constant: Slow (0.2 sec)
13. ©2014 Waters Corporation 13
Liquid Crystal Intermediate Compounds
Chemical Substance
CAS
Number
Retention
time
(minutes)
UV optimum
absorbance
(nm)
4,4′-Azoxyanisole-d14 39750-11-3 0.69 346
4-Butylbenzoic acid 20651-71-2 1.39 235
4-Octylbenzoic acid 3575-31-3 1.62 235
4-Cyanobenzoic acid 3575-31-3 1.75 252
4-Butoxybenzoic acid 1498-96-0 1.90 252
4-(Octyloxy)benzoic acid 2493-84-7 2.09 235
16. ©2014 Waters Corporation 16
252 nm
235 nm
346 nm
4-Cyanobenzoic acid
(0.001 mg/mL)
4-Butylbenzoic acid
(1 mg/mL)
4,4′-Azoxyanisole-d14
(internal standard)
4-(Octyloxy)
benzoic acid
(0.001 mg/mL)
4-Butoxybenzoic acid
(0.001 mg/mL)
Impurity Profiling
17. ©2014 Waters Corporation 17
Liquid Crystal Intermediate Compounds
Merck E7 (liquid crystal intermediate compounds)
4-cyano-4'-n-pentyl-biphenyl 4-cyano-4'-n-heptyl-biphenyl
C18H19N C20H23N
4-cyano-4'-n-oxyoctyl-biphenyl 4-cyano-4''-n-pentyl-p-terphenyl
C21H25NO C24H23N
18. ©2014 Waters Corporation 18
Methods
UPC2 conditions
CCM back pressure: 1800 psi
Sample temp.: 20 oC
Column temp.: 60 oC
Injection volume: 1 µL
Column: ACQUITY UPC2 BEH 2-EP, 3.0 mm
x 100 mm, 1.7 µm
Mobile phase A: CO2
Mobile phase B: Acetonitrile
PDA conditions
UV system: ACQUITY UPC2 PDA Detector
Range : 190 to 450 nm
Resolution: 1.2 nm
Sampling rate: 20 pts/sec
Filter time constant: Slow (0.2 sec)
19. ©2014 Waters Corporation 19
Liquid Crystal Intermediate Compounds
Chemical Substance
CAS
Number
Retention time
(minutes)
UV optimum
absorbance (nm)
4-cyano-4'-n-puntyl-biphenyl 5CB 40817-08-1 0.889 269
4-cyano-4'-n-heptyl-biphenyl 7CB 41122-71-8 1.012 269
4-cyano-4'-n-oxyoctyl-biphenyl 8OCB 52364-73-5 1.469 287
4-cyano-4''-n-pentyl-p-terphenyl 5CT 54211-46-0 1.742 292
21. ©2014 Waters Corporation 21
UV Chromatograms and UV Spectra
4-cyano-4'-n-heptyl-
biphenyl
4-cyano-4'-n-oxyoctyl-
biphenyl
4-cyano-4'-n-puntyl-
biphenyl
4-cyano-4''-n-pentyl-p-
terphenyl
22. ©2014 Waters Corporation 22
Compositional Analysis
blank
Correct ratio
Incorrect ratio
51%
25% 16%
8%
40%
25% 23% 12%
Chemical Substance
Correct ratio Incorrect ratio
Prepared
%
Calculated
%
Prepared
%
Calculated
%
4-cyano-4'-n-puntyl-biphenyl 5CB 51.0 51.3 40.0 40.4
4-cyano-4'-n-heptyl-biphenyl 7CB 25.0 24.9 25.0 24.9
4-cyano-4'-n-oxyoctyl-biphenyl 8OCB 16.0 15.9 23.0 22.7
4-cyano-4''-n-pentyl-p-terphenyl 5CT 8.0 8.0 12.0 12.1
24. ©2014 Waters Corporation 24
Interfacing UPC2 with MS detection
MS splitter
From the Column
manager or PDA
From the
makeup pump
To the
convergence
Manager
To the MS
Waters ACQUITY UPC2 configured with PDA and MS detection (here illustrated with an SQD),
including MS splitter and a makeup pump
25. ©2014 Waters Corporation 25
Interfacing UPC2 with MS detection
Electrospray Ionization (ESI)
– An electrically charged field is used to generate charged droplets,
then analyte ions are formed by evaporation prior to MS analysis
– The addition of a protonation source such as formic acid to the
makeup solvent can be used to enhance ionization and increase
sensitivity
Atmospheric Pressure Photo Ionization (APPI)
– Ultraviolet light produced from a krypton lamp ionizes gas phase
analytes and dopants leading to gas-phase reactions
– Therefore, the addition of a dopant such as toluene to the makeup
solvent can enable and enhance ionization
Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization (APCI)
– The solvent present, from both the co-solvent and the makeup
solvents, acts as chemical ionization reagent gas in order to ionize
the sample
26. ©2014 Waters Corporation 26
Interfacing UPC2 with MS detection
MS conditions
Mass Spectrometer Xevo TQD
Ionization mode APCI APPI ESI
Corona 3.0 µA N/A N/A
Capillary N/A N/A 5.00 kV
APCI probe temp. 300 o
C 300 o
C N/A
Source temp. 150 o
C
Repeller N/A 0.50 kV N/A
Desolvation gas 800 o
C 600 o
C 600 o
C
Cone gas 0 L/hr
Acquisition Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM)
MS splitter conditions
Makeup pump Waters 515
Solvent Methanol Methanol + 10% toluene Methanol + 1% formic acid
Flow 0.4 mL/min
27. ©2014 Waters Corporation 27
Interfacing UPC2 with MS detection
Tuning:
– 2 ppm standards in methanol
– The compounds were tuned in APCI
– MRM, transitions, cone and collision energy values optimized using Xevo TQD fluidics
only:
Compound CAS Mol formula
Molecular
weight
APCI
(+/-)
Cone
Voltage (V)
MRM
Transition
(m/z)
Collision
energy
4-(Octyloxy)benzoic acid 2493-84-7 C15H22O3 250.33 + 40
251.2 > 121.0* 20
251.2 > 139.0 20
4,4′-Azoxyanisole-d14 39750-11-3 C14H13DN2O3 272.36 + 30
273.2 > 114.1* 25
273.2 > 142.1 20
4-Butoxybenzoic acid 1498-96-0 C11H14O3 194.23 + 30
195.0 > 95.0* 20
195.0 > 121.0 20
4-Butylbenzoic acid 20651-71-2 C11H14O2 178.23 + 30
179.1 > 123.0 10
179.1 > 161.0* 15
4-Cyanobenzoic acid 619-65-8 C8H5NO2 147.13 - 25 146 > 102.0* 15
4-Octylbenzoic acid 3575-31-3 C15H22O2 234.33 + 35
235.0 > 123.0* 15
235.0 > 217.0 20
*refers to the quantification transition
28. ©2014 Waters Corporation 28
Interfacing UPC2 with MS detection
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
3
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
APCI APPI ESI
√
√
√
√
√
√
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
1
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
3
Time
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
%
0
4-Octylbenzoic acid
4-(Octyloxy)benzoic acid
4-Butoxybenzoic acid
4-Butylbenzoic acid
4-Cyanobenzoic acid
4,4′-Azoxyanisole-d14
29. ©2014 Waters Corporation 29
Conclusion
Separation by UPC2 is an ideal alternative to both HPLC
and GC analysis
UPC2 with PDA detection offers a cost effective and
efficient impurity profiling and compositional analysis
UPC2 with MS detection:
– greater selectivity and specificity
– orthogonal technique
Many business and analytical benefits, when compared
HPLC for the analysis of liquid crystal intermediate
compounds