7

1. FMP Evaluation
James Cooper-Abel

2. Production Process Evaluation

3. Research
• The strengths of my research were of the existing product research as I
managed to give detailed analysis of what worked in those products
helping me to get a ground work of what I wanted my product to be like
and how it would pan out.
• The weakness of my research is that of my questioner research as I feel
the questions I asked were not detailed enough or have questions that
were to similar to one another or were too hard for some to answer.
however it still gives me a sense of what I should do within my review.
• What I could have done to improve is make some questions easier to
answer for some or replace some with question that can be answered.

4. Planning
• The strengths of my planning is that I new from the start of what I wanted
to do and what I wanted to review this help my product as I did’nt go into
this without a plan and also allowed me to prepare for when it came time
to begin the product.
• The weakness of my planning was that I didn’t have enough time to write
the script which I had to rush as there was a lot of thing I had to prepare
for so some line in the script are faulty and don’t sound right.
• What I will do to improve on this is to make sure I have enough time I have
enough time to plan for a script and how it will be written out.
• The effect this had on my product is that some line I recorded may need to
be taken out as they don’t sound right.

5. Time Management
• I believe I have managed my time well as I tried to stick to a strict time set
of what to do however things didn’t pan out to well as I had hoped as I
had trouble getting game footage from the game a was reviewing meaning
I had to rely on others clips but all things considered I believe I have
handled my time well.
• I have been able to complete my project but only by the skin of my teeth
as stated before there were problems getting footage for the game I was
reviewing, however I believe it would have been better with more time.
• What I would have done if I had had more time would be to rerecord some
of the audio and replace it with new audio as some of it came out weird
meaning its not to the standards I would like.

6. Technical Qualities
Similarity's
1. One of the similarity's my product
and halo cannons product has is
that we both use avatars when we
are directly addressing the
audience.
2. Another similarity between my
product and halo cannons product
is that both of us have a screen
right next to us to show what we’ll
be reviewing.
3. A final similarity between me and
halo cannons product is that we use
clips from games we are reviewing.
Differences
1. One difference between mine and halo
cannons product is that of the settings of
our reviews as his is set in a city whilst
mine is set on a space station.
2. Another difference between mine and halo
cannons product is what we do as he
reviews more things like comics books and
games and also dose videos relating with
the halo universe whilst mine only covers
games.
3. A third difference between mine and halo
cannons product is of the series we review
from as he only reviews things to do with
halo whilst mine touches on all other game
series.
4. A final difference between mine and halo
cannons product is that of what we do with
the product we review as he just reviews it
and leaves it at that whilst mine will review
the game and either put it into and archive
or throw it out of an air lock into the sun to
be destroyed.

7. Aesthetic QualitiesStrengths
1. One of the strengths of my
final piece is that of the
clip transitions as I feel
that the clips move from
one to another very
smoothly.
2. Another strength of my
final piece is that of the
jokes as I believe they are
well set up and aren’t
there to often and in your
face as they are small jabs
that can bring a smile to
someone's face.
3. A third strength of my final
piece is that of the video
quality as it is quite
detailed and not to
pixelated meaning my
audience isn’t distracted
by the quality of the video
4. A final strength of my final
piece is that of the back
ground music and sounds
as they aren’t to
distracting or loud enough
that you can’t hear the
voice over
I believe that my final piece looks very good
and creative as yes there are things that are
similar to it but it is unique enough to stand
on its own.
Weaknesses
1. One of the
weaknesses of my
final piece is that of
the audio work as it
doesn’t sound the
way I wanted it to
sound.
2. Another weaknesses
of my final piece is
that the clips of the
game I am reviewing
is not my own as I
had to rely on
someone else's clip of
the game to get the
project finished.
3. A final weaknesses of
my final piece is that
of some of the avatar
clips as some are
repeats of the other
which I didn’t want
but had to use.
An improvement I would make to m final
piece would be to better the audio and the
avatar clips which I would do by
rerecording the audio and rerecording
some avatar clips.

8. Audience AppealI have applied to my
target audience by
using a game that
resonates with them
as I have a flashy
thumbnail that draws
people in and are
reviewing a game that
applies to those who
like fantasy story's and
tales.
Another way my
product appeals to an
audience is because
the review it self is set
in a Syfy setting
meaning people who
like Syfy will be drawn
as well.
One thing I have used
in my product form
my questioner is that
of the comedic
moments as many
people said that they
prefer to have
comedic bits within a
review.
Another thing I have
taken from my
questionaries' to my
review is of hat people
want to see in it as I
have touched on story
gameplay controls
graphics and personal
opinion and a
conclusion of whether
the game is good or
not.

9. Peer
Feedback

10. Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– Well presented.
– The illustrations were nice.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– The sound could be synced better with the audio.
– The music could do with being quieter in places.
– The clips could be less fuzzy.

11. Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
– I liked when you cut back to the avatar
– The joke were funny
– I liked the script as how it explained the game without going into
details that other that may not understand and gets points across
• What improvements could have been made to the product?
– Sound during the video cause half the time the music was over
shadowing the review at certain points.
– Clips need to be less fuses
– Pauses happen at certain points or crystal clear as of next time record
one page stop and then record the other
– Check a few time before being shown to other as certain picture were
missing so certain joke were confusing.
– Audio needs to be clearer in certain parts

12. Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?

13. Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback? I agree with the audio and music
needs to be improved and the game footage
needs to be less fussy with the video being need
to be looked over first before being showed to
others.
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback? Nothing as I can say all points were
accurate as looking over the video itself the
points being made were quite accurate

14. Peer Feedback Summary
I would improve on the audio by making sure it is more clearer and to make
sure the music is quieter and doesn’t overshadow the audio.
also to make sure the footage isn’t fussy and unclear so it is not distracting
to other.
The reasons why I will make these changes is based on peer feedback as
many of the points of the points I have made are based on the feedback of
those I have asked to view my work.