SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 21
Video
Evaluation
Scott Wilson
Have you met the aims of the brief?
• What were you asked to make? (check 3. Planning and Production lecture)
• We were asked produce our own film which had to be within the time limit of 1-5 minutes, you weren’t aloud to use
dialogue and the film had to be filmed within the college grounds in college time , however if you wanted to film in your in
own time then you would have to supply our own equipment. The target audience of the product had to be within the age
bracket of 16-19 year olds. The film itself is allowed to be a short film or a trailer, Even though the film itself cant have
Dialogue you are still able to add in sounds, music and effects in order to make your production a lot more realistic.
• How did your film meet the aims of the brief?
• I felt we met the aims of the brief, because our production was within the right time limit for example our product was 3
minutes long and the required time limit was 1- 5 minutes so I feel we did achieve this. One other aspect of our production
which met the requirements of the brief was the fact that when we shot the footage it was within the college grounds. One
other way in which our production matched the brief is that our Film trailer was aimed at the target audience 16-19 year
olds, this was the required age range to aim for and I feel our production matched this. One other requirement of the brief I
feel our production matched was that our film didn’t contain any uses of Dialogue besides sound effects, and background
music in order to create a sense of suspense.
• Did you not meet any criteria?
• The majority of the Footage of our film was filmed offsite however, we were told that we could film offsite in our own time.
• Could you have changed your film to match your brief more?
• The Only thing I would change from the film would be to film more in the college grounds.
Does the final film match your original idea?
• What was your original idea?
• I felt that our film did match the idea we went with to start with, our original idea was that the production would be a horror
film trailer. The whole concept of the film was to create a trailer within the genre of Horror, its basically about a deranged 17
year old Boy who is on the run from something mysterious and the audience has no idea who it is or what It is. This
ultimately gives the audience suspense and it would keep them guessing on what is about to happen. We intended to do
most of our shots outside as we couldn’t find a suitable location within the college in order to create and give this scary
effect on the audience.
• Does your idea differ from your original idea at all? How?
• Our film Idea did differ slightly as there were certain shots we weren’t ale to do due to the fact that we couldn’t find a
suitable location for the shots we wanted to make. One other aspect we changed was the amount of shots that we used for
example we were supposed to use about 20 shots we ended up doing approximately 22 shots which then made us have to
change a few shots in order for it to fit our planning.
• Has changing/not changing your film from the original idea made your film
better or worse? How?
• I think changing some part of the film has made our film better as it made certain aspects of the film work with the story of
the film, in addition to this there is also a lot of shots that we could of done in order to make the production realistic and to
make it follow our plan. I also think that the fact we didn’t change much in our film which may of suggested that the
production looked slightly rushed as we didn’t check all the shots we took and we didn’t see if they fitted or make sense
with all the previous shots.
Planning
• What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your
filming/editing/overall film?
• I felt that our film did match the idea we went with to start with, our original idea was that the production would be a horror
film trailer. The whole concept of the film was to create a trailer within the genre of Horror, its basically about a deranged 17
year old Boy who is on the run from something mysterious and the audience has no idea who it is or what It is. This
ultimately gives the audience suspense and it would keep them guessing on what is about to happen. We intended to do
most of our shots outside as we couldn’t find a suitable location within the college in order to create and give this scary
effect on the audience.
• What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done
better/improve? What effect would this have had on your film?
• Our film Idea did differ slightly as there were certain shots we weren’t ale to do due to the fact that we couldn’t find a
suitable location for the shots we wanted to make. One other aspect we changed was the amount of shots that we used for
example we were supposed to use about 20 shots we ended up doing approximately 22 shots which then made us have to
change a few shots in order for it to fit our planning.
Strengths of the filming
• What shots/scenes/sequences do you think worked well? Why? Include specific
examples
• The shots which I thought that worked well with the production is the shot at 00:44 I thought this
worked well as it was quite dynamic as it showed the character was running away from something
and the way that the camera focuses on the middle part and the foreground and background are all
blurred out which gives off this dynamic feel and suspense as it creates sense of mystery. One other
example of a shot which I thought worked well was the shot at 00:47, I thought it worked well with
the production because the I thought the scenery really gave it a mysterious feel to the film as it
was Dark and the background itself was pitch black this gave it a sense of suspense. I thought that it
worked well because the audience would immediately be drawn into the Location and the sense of
mystery that it gives off.One other aspect of the film I thought worked well was the shot at 1:05, I
think it makes the audience question what the actor is running from which adds suspense and it
could also make the audience wonder what happens next which then adds a unknown factor. From
the production that I created the scene I liked the most was the wood land scene from 1:33 to 2:36
I thought that it was this scene that really captured the whole mystery of the film. As there was a
lot shots which really captures the whole element of the Genre for example with the use of the pan
shot at 1:52 this really captured the whole element of the film and I also feel it adds another
perspective for the audience as it moves to the actors face as it shows a sense of fear on his face.
One other aspect of the sequence that I enjoyed was the build up to the woodland are from 00:50
seconds to 1:20 the music changed its tempo slightly so that it creates build up which then adds
more suspense.
Areas for improvement for the filming
• What shots/scenes/sequences do you think could be improved? Why? Include specific examples
• I think the shots which could be improved is the scene at the start as it just didn't look that scary and it didn't really match
the genre we was going for, especially at 00:08 seconds in of the film as there was people walking by and at bottom of the
shot you could see the wood from the Balcony we was filming from this gave the film a sort of amateur look and it almost
killed the whole theme of the film. I think it should be Improved as it its an error in the production due to the fact that it
looks unprofessional. One other aspect of the film with regards to shots that could be improved is the way that in some of
the shots we didn't position the camera in a good enough position in order for it to work as some of the shots jumped
slightly or the lighting wasn't great so we had to change some of the shots or re-shoot them. Especially at 00:15 seconds in
the lighting was effecting the shot that we had to make. The reason I think this should be improved is because it makes the
production look rushed this a problem as it takes away the smoothness of the product and it also may not match the same
colours as the rest of the shots so this could make the film look odd. With regards to the way that the scenes are I don't
think theres a lot which needs improving however I did encounter one small flaw within the film is the Scene from 00:25
seconds to 00:41 the sequence wasn't very good and it looked rushed, when the acting in the film wasn't up to standard as I
was running at different paces so the shots looked slightly Jumpy. I think this needs to be improved because the film itself
doesn't look as professional as I would like it to look and it takes away the point of the film if the acting is bad as it draws
attention from the actual plot of the film. One aspect of the film that I would change with sequence it would be the opening
sequence as they aren't really done to the standard of which we hoped, for example from 00:08 seconds 00:20 seconds in, I
think that it looks rushed and there are a lot of faults with this sequence as it doesn't give it the edge which is needed in the
film in order to make it have a horror effect on the audience.
• What would you change/do differently if you had more time?
• If we had more time I think the shot that we would change would be the Introduction and the way that it looks because the shots don't
look as smooth as we would like so this would be a problem as it takes away the whole theme of the film as it doesn't reallygo with the
genre of horror especially with the way that the shots look. If we had more time I would make sure that all the shots that aren't up to
potential I would reshoot them and make sure they’re what they are supposed to look like. One other aspect of the Film that would
benefit the way that the film looks is by maybe add more scenes in order to make it longer and in order to give it more of astory so that
the audience can understand whats going on. I would also make sure that all the shots are put in and make sure that all the shots are up
to standard so that we can make it look `a lot more professional.
Editing
Evaluation
What worked well on the edit
• What edits/cuts/transitions do you think worked well? Why? Include specific examples
• The edits that I thought worked well with the production was the use of colour correction that we used in
certain shots of the production. The reason I felt it worked well was because it really gave the production a
Creepy effect and it also made some of the shots look less Amateur which gave the product more realism
on the production. One other way in which our Edits worked well was the way that we made each shot fit
with the cut so that it made the production smooth especially at 00:43. The reason I felt it worked well
was because of the way in which the shot alternated to a different location which would suggest that the
character was in a another location.
• One way In which the cuts worked well was because the Cut between each of the shots was smooth which
allowed the production to not Jump, for example at 00:56 you can see that cut was smooth and you could
see clearly that the character has moved to another Location. The reason I thought it worked well was
because it didn’t Jump and look unprofessional this allowed the film to flow.
• One way in which the Transitions work well is the way that the we used Fades, this adds a sense of
suspense to the audience and it shows that time is passing. This effective as it makes the film look less dull
and actually adds a sense of suspense to the audience and I also think that the transition works well with
the Genre of the film as fades are usually effective in Horror style Films.
Areas for improvement on the edit
• What edits/cuts/transitions do you think could be improved? Why? Include specific examples
• I think the edits which could be improved are the uses of contrast and the colour correcting would be a good start as some
of the shots are slightly bright for example at 00:22, the shot when I was coming out the front entrance was slightly bright
and needed to be slightly adjusted but we could of retook the shot on a different day. One other aspect of the Editing we
could of improved was the use of experimentation with the Editing in order to make the product look even more realistic
and it we could of expanded on our knowledge of editing.
• With regards to the cuts I feel the majority if the cuts worked really well however, there was one small problem at the start
of the film approximately 00:04 seconds into the production there is a black screen. This could be improved as it makes the
production look unprofessional.
• One other aspect we could improve in Terms of Transitions is we could maybe add more transitions in order to give the film
a whole new different feel, it could also change the way in which the film looks and give it a whole new view point. The
reason I think this is because the film would be a lot smoother and it would show off a whole new level of production and it
would give the film a dynamic feel to production.
• What would you change/do differently if you had more time?
• and possibly try to make more of the facilities around the college, this could make more of a story and I also think if we had
more time we could maybe edit more aspects of the film in order to make the film a little more scarier and also change the
colour correction and add more transitions in order to make the film look a lot more realistic
Choices made during production
• During the edit did you make any changes to what you originally planned?
Why?
• During the Edit I don’t think there was a lot of changes that we encountered and what we
initially planned , however our original idea was to add a dark, scary feel to the production
that we created and in my opinion I feel that we did achieve this. However there was one
thing that we could of changed and that was the amount of shots that we used as we had to
delete some of the shots in order to fit in with the time that we had left, for example at 1:05
we had to cut it short in order to shorten it to fit in the time that was available. The reason I
think this is because we would be able to add more shots in order to make our film better.
Justification of style for format
• Did you use new wave or classic continuity? Why? Provide examples of how you used the style
• I think our Film had a hint of both classic continuity and new wave as we did most of our shots were done
first time. I think we used classical continuity as some shots we didn't edit as much we just let it cut to the
next scene, for example at 00:11 where the actor went from inside of the building to outside. I think we
did this as we thought that it would be the best way of showing the audience that the actor has moved to
a different Location. One other way in which we used continuity editing was at 00:28, this was used in
order to make the actor look like he was still in the same location.
• I think we used the new Wave editing in order to show various different angles and cuts for example at
00:33 seconds you can see a close up on the actors shoes in order to indicate that the actor is running and
it also gives a whole different angle on the film. I think we used this specific shot in order to show another
perspective on the film and to show a different angle on the actors movement as it shows a sense of panic
towards the audience. One other aspect of the Film where I felt we used New wave Editing was the use of
colour correction on the film in order to make the film darker this gives the film a whole new different
outlook. I feel we used this in order to create the Darkness on some of the shots to give it a sort of horror
feel, especially at 00:44 seconds as it creates an atmosphere which the audience could feel tension.
Intended purpose of the edited material
• What was your film’s purpose (entertain, educate, promote etc)? How did
you achieve this in your film? What aspects of editing helped fulfil this
purpose?
• The purpose of the film was to entertain, I feel we did this in our film because in certain aspects I felt it
really engaged the audience and it gave them a sense of curiosity as the audience didn’t know who was
chasing the character this adds a sense of suspense. We also achieved this with the vast use of darkness
within the shots which gives the audience a sense of fear, this immediatley suggest to the audience that
the genre of our film is Horror. I think the aspects of the Editing which helped us achieve this is the use of
colour correction and darkness of some of the shots as this help give the audience an idea of what genre
the film is. Especially with the shots in 00:55 it reflects a dark, cold chilling atmosphere.
Use of selected editing techniques
• What editing techniques did you use? Return to your terminology section of the 2. Editing Lecture. Why
did you use each technique. Provide detailed examples of where each was used.
• Within our film I thought we used the technique Editing in camera as we took a specific shot and stopped
started on some of the shots as they didn't need to be edited. I thought we used this technique because it
was a good way of showing simplistic shots and we also used this technique in order to save time on some
of the edits which we had left to do. We used this technique at the start of the film 00:07 seconds in as it
showed that there was barely editing in the shot.
• One other editing technique that we used was the use of continuity editing, we used this technique we
were able to create a narrative connection towards the audience in order for them to understand the
concept of the film to which we are aiming for and that was to produce a horror trailer. A specific example
where we used this technique was at 1:38, at this time you can clearly see that the there is a widescreen
shot on the actor in the film so you can see the background and the character, this gives the feeling that
there is something looking at him and keeping an eye out.
• We used the of Rhythym a lot in order to make all the shots consistent so it shows the same meaning as all
the other shots. especially at the time 1:00 this was used in order to create a sense of Danger and to make
sure that the shots made sense with the production.
Ability to convey intended meaning/atmosphere
• Reference where your edits created meaning and atmosphere. Reference specific examples
• An example of where our edits created a sense of meaning is with the use of Darkness on the colour correction of
the film, this was used in order to create a sense of suspense and to make the audience sort of wonder or guess
what is going to happen. This happens at 1:38 where there is a wide shot on the actor this has been used in order
to make the audience know that there is something looking at him which creates the sense of fear. One other
example of where we used darkness on the colour correction is at 00:44, the atmosphere and the meaning which
is created in this scene is the fact that scenery looks damp and dull this immediately indicates to the audience that
the Film is horror and it makes them question what might happen later on. It also would make them ask questions
and think a bit more about the film. The reason I feel this is because the location of the bridge and the cars that
are flying past give it a little bit of atmosphere as it makes the audience get an idea of the Location of the film.
• One other way in which we created atmosphere is the Locations that we chose for example at the start of the film
at 00:05 seconds in theres a use of a birdseye view shot on the character in the film this would suggest that
someones watching him and it shows who's in power throughout the film. It also creates a sense of Danger on the
character. One other aspect of which the Locations create a sense of meaning is the way in which the woodland
area fits in with the Horror genre as it is such a cliche location for other horror films. This is because it gives a
creepy atmosphere towards the audience and it also represents mystery as its normally a dark and gloomy place
to go. You can see this from the sequence at 1:31 and 2:33 with the bridge and the graffiti on the walls this
represents rebellious territory a place where you shouldn't go. there is also a lot of build up towards the woodland
scene which gives off a creepy effect on the audience. This is all helped with the use of Colour correction and
contrast so that it creates the horror atmosphere.
Peer
Feedback
Feedback 1
• What did you like about the film?
– What could have been improved in the editing process is
that the effects in terms of colour could have been a little
bit more darker (black and white more) so the film has a
more creepy feel to it.
• What improvements could have been made on the
film?
• What I liked about the editing was that the cuts were
made in time with the actions including the quick fade
out when Scott looks up and has the scream effect
which made the scene look and feel realistic.
Feedback 1
• What did you like about the editing of the film
– What I liked about the editing was that the cuts were made in
time with the actions including the quick fade out when Scott
looks up and has the scream effect which made the scene look
and feel realistic.
• What improvements could have been made to the editing?
• What could have been improved in the editing process is
that the effects in terms of colour could have been a little
bit more darker (black and white more) so the film has a
more creepy feel to it.
Feedback 2
• What did you like about the film?
– • Good use of locations
– • Fulfilled brief well
– • Colour balancing worked nicely to add to atmosphere in exterior shots
– • Good use of locations to diversify footage and develop tone and atmosphere
• What improvements could have been made on the film?
• • Could have established plot early in the film so we understand why he is running from
something/someone
• • White balance/light input could have been checked when filming to ensure shots do not
differ from each other dramatically
Feedback 2
• What did you like about the editing of the film
– • Good post production techniques to give exterior shot near
professional visual style
– • Shots progress story
– • Shots last an appropriate amount of time
• What improvements could have been made to the editing?
• • Shot of the underpass could have been cropped further to remove skater from view
• • Further post-production editing techniques could have been used to minimise colour/light change between
interior and exterior shots
•
Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer feedback?
– I agree with that some of the shots weren't the same as there was quite a significant amount of
Lighting that really killed the atmosphere of the film, I also agree that the fall in the film wasn't
realistic. As i don't think it looked as believable as I would of hoped it would be.One other aspect of
the feedback that I believe is the way that the plot of the film wasn't introduced quicker which made
some audiences confused about what I was running from. One other aspect of the feedback that I
agree with is that the shot of the underpass could of been cropped a lot more so you weren't able to
see certain people in the background. I also agree that further post production editing techniques
could of been implemented in order to make the product look a little less uneven.
• What do you disagree with from your peer feedback?
• The only aspect of the feedback that I disagree with is that the way that the darkness and the colour
correction that we used was implemented so we didn't really need to make it any darker than it actually
was.
Peer Feedback Summary
• What changes would you make to your film
based upon your peer feedback and why?
• The changes that I would make to my Production is that I will add better lighting on some of the
shots as it didn't look as consistent as I would of wanted, one other way in which I would improve
my Film is by making some acting sequences a little more realistic, this could make the audience
believe the plot of the film. One other aspect of the film which I agree with is to add more shots in
order to make the film have a plot to which the audience would be able to follow. I also agree that
in some of the shots there are things as to which that needed to be cut out in order to make the
film look that bit more professional and realistic. I also agree that there needs to be a lot more post
production aspects in order to make the film look a lot scarier with regards to editing.

More Related Content

What's hot

6. evaluation sf 2017 done
6. evaluation sf 2017 done6. evaluation sf 2017 done
6. evaluation sf 2017 donelouis harman
 
Production Management Evaluation
Production Management Evaluation Production Management Evaluation
Production Management Evaluation Shahzaib Yaqoob
 
6. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 20176. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 2017Abbey Glancy
 
Evaluation music video(1) (1)
Evaluation music video(1) (1)Evaluation music video(1) (1)
Evaluation music video(1) (1)AmyWatson69
 
Mv production assignment evaluation form 2019
Mv production assignment evaluation form 2019Mv production assignment evaluation form 2019
Mv production assignment evaluation form 2019alfieepimblett
 
FlipBook Magazine Interview - Evaluation Question 7
FlipBook Magazine Interview - Evaluation Question 7FlipBook Magazine Interview - Evaluation Question 7
FlipBook Magazine Interview - Evaluation Question 7CVSmediastudies
 
Evaluation (1)
Evaluation (1)Evaluation (1)
Evaluation (1)lukeh01
 
6. evaluation sf 2017 final
6. evaluation sf 2017 final6. evaluation sf 2017 final
6. evaluation sf 2017 finalKieran Bradley
 
Video evaluation
Video evaluationVideo evaluation
Video evaluationHICKMAN98
 
Film practices and photography
Film practices and photographyFilm practices and photography
Film practices and photographyharrydocwra
 
6. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 20176. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 2017Tom Batty
 

What's hot (20)

6. evaluation sf 2017 done
6. evaluation sf 2017 done6. evaluation sf 2017 done
6. evaluation sf 2017 done
 
5. Evaluation
5. Evaluation5. Evaluation
5. Evaluation
 
FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation
 
Production Management Evaluation
Production Management Evaluation Production Management Evaluation
Production Management Evaluation
 
Question 3
Question 3Question 3
Question 3
 
6. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 20176. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 2017
 
FMP evaluation updated
FMP evaluation updatedFMP evaluation updated
FMP evaluation updated
 
Evaluation music video(1) (1)
Evaluation music video(1) (1)Evaluation music video(1) (1)
Evaluation music video(1) (1)
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
Mv production assignment evaluation form 2019
Mv production assignment evaluation form 2019Mv production assignment evaluation form 2019
Mv production assignment evaluation form 2019
 
FlipBook Magazine Interview - Evaluation Question 7
FlipBook Magazine Interview - Evaluation Question 7FlipBook Magazine Interview - Evaluation Question 7
FlipBook Magazine Interview - Evaluation Question 7
 
6. evaluation
6. evaluation6. evaluation
6. evaluation
 
Evaluation (1)
Evaluation (1)Evaluation (1)
Evaluation (1)
 
6. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 20176. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 2017
 
Development diary
Development diaryDevelopment diary
Development diary
 
6. evaluation sf 2017 final
6. evaluation sf 2017 final6. evaluation sf 2017 final
6. evaluation sf 2017 final
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
Video evaluation
Video evaluationVideo evaluation
Video evaluation
 
Film practices and photography
Film practices and photographyFilm practices and photography
Film practices and photography
 
6. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 20176. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 2017
 

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (14)

Personal Statement
Personal StatementPersonal Statement
Personal Statement
 
Animation planning document
Animation planning documentAnimation planning document
Animation planning document
 
Middle School Presentation
Middle School PresentationMiddle School Presentation
Middle School Presentation
 
Next Gen Museums
Next Gen MuseumsNext Gen Museums
Next Gen Museums
 
Editing 2
Editing 2Editing 2
Editing 2
 
FINANCIAL AID LETTER REVIEW
FINANCIAL AID LETTER REVIEWFINANCIAL AID LETTER REVIEW
FINANCIAL AID LETTER REVIEW
 
Comparison
ComparisonComparison
Comparison
 
A Quick Guide to Beacon Basics
A Quick Guide to Beacon  BasicsA Quick Guide to Beacon  Basics
A Quick Guide to Beacon Basics
 
Smart Cities- What Are They
Smart Cities-  What Are TheySmart Cities-  What Are They
Smart Cities- What Are They
 
Education 2.0
Education 2.0Education 2.0
Education 2.0
 
Scotts initial plans
Scotts initial plansScotts initial plans
Scotts initial plans
 
Future Of Cinema
Future Of CinemaFuture Of Cinema
Future Of Cinema
 
perfomance gap
perfomance gapperfomance gap
perfomance gap
 
Business todaye
Business todayeBusiness todaye
Business todaye
 

Similar to Video evaluation

6. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 20176. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 2017Thomas Haase
 
Evaluation Short Film
Evaluation Short FilmEvaluation Short Film
Evaluation Short FilmCharlie Atkin
 
Media studies powerpoint
Media studies powerpointMedia studies powerpoint
Media studies powerpointmike155
 
Media studies powerpoint fin
Media studies powerpoint finMedia studies powerpoint fin
Media studies powerpoint finmike155
 
Media studies powerpoint finished
Media studies powerpoint finishedMedia studies powerpoint finished
Media studies powerpoint finishedmike155
 
6. evaluation sf 2017 2
6. evaluation sf 2017 26. evaluation sf 2017 2
6. evaluation sf 2017 2jack-morton
 
Media Evaluation
Media EvaluationMedia Evaluation
Media EvaluationAaron3132
 
Evaluation of media coursework presentation
Evaluation of media coursework presentationEvaluation of media coursework presentation
Evaluation of media coursework presentationgueste1ac4b
 
Evaluation of preliminary task
Evaluation of preliminary taskEvaluation of preliminary task
Evaluation of preliminary task08tparnell
 
Abi Edwards and Sian Ball AS Evaluation
Abi Edwards and Sian Ball AS EvaluationAbi Edwards and Sian Ball AS Evaluation
Abi Edwards and Sian Ball AS Evaluationguest483abee
 
As media studies
As media studiesAs media studies
As media studieshkesson
 
Question 7 of evaluation
Question 7 of evaluationQuestion 7 of evaluation
Question 7 of evaluationAnnaMoorhouse
 

Similar to Video evaluation (20)

Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
Question 7
Question 7Question 7
Question 7
 
Question 7
Question 7Question 7
Question 7
 
Media evaluation
Media evaluationMedia evaluation
Media evaluation
 
6. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 20176. evaluation sf 2017
6. evaluation sf 2017
 
Evaluation Short Film
Evaluation Short FilmEvaluation Short Film
Evaluation Short Film
 
Media studies powerpoint
Media studies powerpointMedia studies powerpoint
Media studies powerpoint
 
Media studies powerpoint fin
Media studies powerpoint finMedia studies powerpoint fin
Media studies powerpoint fin
 
Media studies powerpoint finished
Media studies powerpoint finishedMedia studies powerpoint finished
Media studies powerpoint finished
 
6. evaluation sf 2017 2
6. evaluation sf 2017 26. evaluation sf 2017 2
6. evaluation sf 2017 2
 
Media Evaluation
Media EvaluationMedia Evaluation
Media Evaluation
 
Evaluation of media coursework presentation
Evaluation of media coursework presentationEvaluation of media coursework presentation
Evaluation of media coursework presentation
 
Evaluation of preliminary task
Evaluation of preliminary taskEvaluation of preliminary task
Evaluation of preliminary task
 
Question 05
Question 05Question 05
Question 05
 
Evaluation.
Evaluation.Evaluation.
Evaluation.
 
7 evaluation
7 evaluation7 evaluation
7 evaluation
 
Abi Edwards and Sian Ball AS Evaluation
Abi Edwards and Sian Ball AS EvaluationAbi Edwards and Sian Ball AS Evaluation
Abi Edwards and Sian Ball AS Evaluation
 
As media studies
As media studiesAs media studies
As media studies
 
Question 7 of evaluation
Question 7 of evaluationQuestion 7 of evaluation
Question 7 of evaluation
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 

More from Scott-Wilson

The good the band and the ugly
The good the band and the uglyThe good the band and the ugly
The good the band and the uglyScott-Wilson
 
Stylistic features
Stylistic featuresStylistic features
Stylistic featuresScott-Wilson
 
Guardians of the galaxy
Guardians of the galaxyGuardians of the galaxy
Guardians of the galaxyScott-Wilson
 
Animation theory pro forma1
Animation theory pro forma1Animation theory pro forma1
Animation theory pro forma1Scott-Wilson
 
Advertising theory pro forma
Advertising theory pro forma Advertising theory pro forma
Advertising theory pro forma Scott-Wilson
 
Advertising product
Advertising productAdvertising product
Advertising productScott-Wilson
 
Final Major Project
Final Major ProjectFinal Major Project
Final Major ProjectScott-Wilson
 
2.scotts research document 3
2.scotts research document 32.scotts research document 3
2.scotts research document 3Scott-Wilson
 

More from Scott-Wilson (15)

Second comic
Second comicSecond comic
Second comic
 
The shining
The shiningThe shining
The shining
 
The good the band and the ugly
The good the band and the uglyThe good the band and the ugly
The good the band and the ugly
 
Stylistic features
Stylistic featuresStylistic features
Stylistic features
 
Guardians of the galaxy
Guardians of the galaxyGuardians of the galaxy
Guardians of the galaxy
 
Guardians added
Guardians addedGuardians added
Guardians added
 
Factual product
Factual productFactual product
Factual product
 
Case studies
Case studiesCase studies
Case studies
 
Animation theory pro forma1
Animation theory pro forma1Animation theory pro forma1
Animation theory pro forma1
 
Advertising theory pro forma
Advertising theory pro forma Advertising theory pro forma
Advertising theory pro forma
 
Advertising product
Advertising productAdvertising product
Advertising product
 
Choices[1] 2
Choices[1] 2Choices[1] 2
Choices[1] 2
 
Final Major Project
Final Major ProjectFinal Major Project
Final Major Project
 
3. proposal(1)
3. proposal(1)3. proposal(1)
3. proposal(1)
 
2.scotts research document 3
2.scotts research document 32.scotts research document 3
2.scotts research document 3
 

Video evaluation

  • 2. Have you met the aims of the brief? • What were you asked to make? (check 3. Planning and Production lecture) • We were asked produce our own film which had to be within the time limit of 1-5 minutes, you weren’t aloud to use dialogue and the film had to be filmed within the college grounds in college time , however if you wanted to film in your in own time then you would have to supply our own equipment. The target audience of the product had to be within the age bracket of 16-19 year olds. The film itself is allowed to be a short film or a trailer, Even though the film itself cant have Dialogue you are still able to add in sounds, music and effects in order to make your production a lot more realistic. • How did your film meet the aims of the brief? • I felt we met the aims of the brief, because our production was within the right time limit for example our product was 3 minutes long and the required time limit was 1- 5 minutes so I feel we did achieve this. One other aspect of our production which met the requirements of the brief was the fact that when we shot the footage it was within the college grounds. One other way in which our production matched the brief is that our Film trailer was aimed at the target audience 16-19 year olds, this was the required age range to aim for and I feel our production matched this. One other requirement of the brief I feel our production matched was that our film didn’t contain any uses of Dialogue besides sound effects, and background music in order to create a sense of suspense. • Did you not meet any criteria? • The majority of the Footage of our film was filmed offsite however, we were told that we could film offsite in our own time. • Could you have changed your film to match your brief more? • The Only thing I would change from the film would be to film more in the college grounds.
  • 3. Does the final film match your original idea? • What was your original idea? • I felt that our film did match the idea we went with to start with, our original idea was that the production would be a horror film trailer. The whole concept of the film was to create a trailer within the genre of Horror, its basically about a deranged 17 year old Boy who is on the run from something mysterious and the audience has no idea who it is or what It is. This ultimately gives the audience suspense and it would keep them guessing on what is about to happen. We intended to do most of our shots outside as we couldn’t find a suitable location within the college in order to create and give this scary effect on the audience. • Does your idea differ from your original idea at all? How? • Our film Idea did differ slightly as there were certain shots we weren’t ale to do due to the fact that we couldn’t find a suitable location for the shots we wanted to make. One other aspect we changed was the amount of shots that we used for example we were supposed to use about 20 shots we ended up doing approximately 22 shots which then made us have to change a few shots in order for it to fit our planning. • Has changing/not changing your film from the original idea made your film better or worse? How? • I think changing some part of the film has made our film better as it made certain aspects of the film work with the story of the film, in addition to this there is also a lot of shots that we could of done in order to make the production realistic and to make it follow our plan. I also think that the fact we didn’t change much in our film which may of suggested that the production looked slightly rushed as we didn’t check all the shots we took and we didn’t see if they fitted or make sense with all the previous shots.
  • 4. Planning • What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your filming/editing/overall film? • I felt that our film did match the idea we went with to start with, our original idea was that the production would be a horror film trailer. The whole concept of the film was to create a trailer within the genre of Horror, its basically about a deranged 17 year old Boy who is on the run from something mysterious and the audience has no idea who it is or what It is. This ultimately gives the audience suspense and it would keep them guessing on what is about to happen. We intended to do most of our shots outside as we couldn’t find a suitable location within the college in order to create and give this scary effect on the audience. • What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your film? • Our film Idea did differ slightly as there were certain shots we weren’t ale to do due to the fact that we couldn’t find a suitable location for the shots we wanted to make. One other aspect we changed was the amount of shots that we used for example we were supposed to use about 20 shots we ended up doing approximately 22 shots which then made us have to change a few shots in order for it to fit our planning.
  • 5. Strengths of the filming • What shots/scenes/sequences do you think worked well? Why? Include specific examples • The shots which I thought that worked well with the production is the shot at 00:44 I thought this worked well as it was quite dynamic as it showed the character was running away from something and the way that the camera focuses on the middle part and the foreground and background are all blurred out which gives off this dynamic feel and suspense as it creates sense of mystery. One other example of a shot which I thought worked well was the shot at 00:47, I thought it worked well with the production because the I thought the scenery really gave it a mysterious feel to the film as it was Dark and the background itself was pitch black this gave it a sense of suspense. I thought that it worked well because the audience would immediately be drawn into the Location and the sense of mystery that it gives off.One other aspect of the film I thought worked well was the shot at 1:05, I think it makes the audience question what the actor is running from which adds suspense and it could also make the audience wonder what happens next which then adds a unknown factor. From the production that I created the scene I liked the most was the wood land scene from 1:33 to 2:36 I thought that it was this scene that really captured the whole mystery of the film. As there was a lot shots which really captures the whole element of the Genre for example with the use of the pan shot at 1:52 this really captured the whole element of the film and I also feel it adds another perspective for the audience as it moves to the actors face as it shows a sense of fear on his face. One other aspect of the sequence that I enjoyed was the build up to the woodland are from 00:50 seconds to 1:20 the music changed its tempo slightly so that it creates build up which then adds more suspense.
  • 6. Areas for improvement for the filming • What shots/scenes/sequences do you think could be improved? Why? Include specific examples • I think the shots which could be improved is the scene at the start as it just didn't look that scary and it didn't really match the genre we was going for, especially at 00:08 seconds in of the film as there was people walking by and at bottom of the shot you could see the wood from the Balcony we was filming from this gave the film a sort of amateur look and it almost killed the whole theme of the film. I think it should be Improved as it its an error in the production due to the fact that it looks unprofessional. One other aspect of the film with regards to shots that could be improved is the way that in some of the shots we didn't position the camera in a good enough position in order for it to work as some of the shots jumped slightly or the lighting wasn't great so we had to change some of the shots or re-shoot them. Especially at 00:15 seconds in the lighting was effecting the shot that we had to make. The reason I think this should be improved is because it makes the production look rushed this a problem as it takes away the smoothness of the product and it also may not match the same colours as the rest of the shots so this could make the film look odd. With regards to the way that the scenes are I don't think theres a lot which needs improving however I did encounter one small flaw within the film is the Scene from 00:25 seconds to 00:41 the sequence wasn't very good and it looked rushed, when the acting in the film wasn't up to standard as I was running at different paces so the shots looked slightly Jumpy. I think this needs to be improved because the film itself doesn't look as professional as I would like it to look and it takes away the point of the film if the acting is bad as it draws attention from the actual plot of the film. One aspect of the film that I would change with sequence it would be the opening sequence as they aren't really done to the standard of which we hoped, for example from 00:08 seconds 00:20 seconds in, I think that it looks rushed and there are a lot of faults with this sequence as it doesn't give it the edge which is needed in the film in order to make it have a horror effect on the audience. • What would you change/do differently if you had more time? • If we had more time I think the shot that we would change would be the Introduction and the way that it looks because the shots don't look as smooth as we would like so this would be a problem as it takes away the whole theme of the film as it doesn't reallygo with the genre of horror especially with the way that the shots look. If we had more time I would make sure that all the shots that aren't up to potential I would reshoot them and make sure they’re what they are supposed to look like. One other aspect of the Film that would benefit the way that the film looks is by maybe add more scenes in order to make it longer and in order to give it more of astory so that the audience can understand whats going on. I would also make sure that all the shots are put in and make sure that all the shots are up to standard so that we can make it look `a lot more professional.
  • 8. What worked well on the edit • What edits/cuts/transitions do you think worked well? Why? Include specific examples • The edits that I thought worked well with the production was the use of colour correction that we used in certain shots of the production. The reason I felt it worked well was because it really gave the production a Creepy effect and it also made some of the shots look less Amateur which gave the product more realism on the production. One other way in which our Edits worked well was the way that we made each shot fit with the cut so that it made the production smooth especially at 00:43. The reason I felt it worked well was because of the way in which the shot alternated to a different location which would suggest that the character was in a another location. • One way In which the cuts worked well was because the Cut between each of the shots was smooth which allowed the production to not Jump, for example at 00:56 you can see that cut was smooth and you could see clearly that the character has moved to another Location. The reason I thought it worked well was because it didn’t Jump and look unprofessional this allowed the film to flow. • One way in which the Transitions work well is the way that the we used Fades, this adds a sense of suspense to the audience and it shows that time is passing. This effective as it makes the film look less dull and actually adds a sense of suspense to the audience and I also think that the transition works well with the Genre of the film as fades are usually effective in Horror style Films.
  • 9. Areas for improvement on the edit • What edits/cuts/transitions do you think could be improved? Why? Include specific examples • I think the edits which could be improved are the uses of contrast and the colour correcting would be a good start as some of the shots are slightly bright for example at 00:22, the shot when I was coming out the front entrance was slightly bright and needed to be slightly adjusted but we could of retook the shot on a different day. One other aspect of the Editing we could of improved was the use of experimentation with the Editing in order to make the product look even more realistic and it we could of expanded on our knowledge of editing. • With regards to the cuts I feel the majority if the cuts worked really well however, there was one small problem at the start of the film approximately 00:04 seconds into the production there is a black screen. This could be improved as it makes the production look unprofessional. • One other aspect we could improve in Terms of Transitions is we could maybe add more transitions in order to give the film a whole new different feel, it could also change the way in which the film looks and give it a whole new view point. The reason I think this is because the film would be a lot smoother and it would show off a whole new level of production and it would give the film a dynamic feel to production. • What would you change/do differently if you had more time? • and possibly try to make more of the facilities around the college, this could make more of a story and I also think if we had more time we could maybe edit more aspects of the film in order to make the film a little more scarier and also change the colour correction and add more transitions in order to make the film look a lot more realistic
  • 10. Choices made during production • During the edit did you make any changes to what you originally planned? Why? • During the Edit I don’t think there was a lot of changes that we encountered and what we initially planned , however our original idea was to add a dark, scary feel to the production that we created and in my opinion I feel that we did achieve this. However there was one thing that we could of changed and that was the amount of shots that we used as we had to delete some of the shots in order to fit in with the time that we had left, for example at 1:05 we had to cut it short in order to shorten it to fit in the time that was available. The reason I think this is because we would be able to add more shots in order to make our film better.
  • 11. Justification of style for format • Did you use new wave or classic continuity? Why? Provide examples of how you used the style • I think our Film had a hint of both classic continuity and new wave as we did most of our shots were done first time. I think we used classical continuity as some shots we didn't edit as much we just let it cut to the next scene, for example at 00:11 where the actor went from inside of the building to outside. I think we did this as we thought that it would be the best way of showing the audience that the actor has moved to a different Location. One other way in which we used continuity editing was at 00:28, this was used in order to make the actor look like he was still in the same location. • I think we used the new Wave editing in order to show various different angles and cuts for example at 00:33 seconds you can see a close up on the actors shoes in order to indicate that the actor is running and it also gives a whole different angle on the film. I think we used this specific shot in order to show another perspective on the film and to show a different angle on the actors movement as it shows a sense of panic towards the audience. One other aspect of the Film where I felt we used New wave Editing was the use of colour correction on the film in order to make the film darker this gives the film a whole new different outlook. I feel we used this in order to create the Darkness on some of the shots to give it a sort of horror feel, especially at 00:44 seconds as it creates an atmosphere which the audience could feel tension.
  • 12. Intended purpose of the edited material • What was your film’s purpose (entertain, educate, promote etc)? How did you achieve this in your film? What aspects of editing helped fulfil this purpose? • The purpose of the film was to entertain, I feel we did this in our film because in certain aspects I felt it really engaged the audience and it gave them a sense of curiosity as the audience didn’t know who was chasing the character this adds a sense of suspense. We also achieved this with the vast use of darkness within the shots which gives the audience a sense of fear, this immediatley suggest to the audience that the genre of our film is Horror. I think the aspects of the Editing which helped us achieve this is the use of colour correction and darkness of some of the shots as this help give the audience an idea of what genre the film is. Especially with the shots in 00:55 it reflects a dark, cold chilling atmosphere.
  • 13. Use of selected editing techniques • What editing techniques did you use? Return to your terminology section of the 2. Editing Lecture. Why did you use each technique. Provide detailed examples of where each was used. • Within our film I thought we used the technique Editing in camera as we took a specific shot and stopped started on some of the shots as they didn't need to be edited. I thought we used this technique because it was a good way of showing simplistic shots and we also used this technique in order to save time on some of the edits which we had left to do. We used this technique at the start of the film 00:07 seconds in as it showed that there was barely editing in the shot. • One other editing technique that we used was the use of continuity editing, we used this technique we were able to create a narrative connection towards the audience in order for them to understand the concept of the film to which we are aiming for and that was to produce a horror trailer. A specific example where we used this technique was at 1:38, at this time you can clearly see that the there is a widescreen shot on the actor in the film so you can see the background and the character, this gives the feeling that there is something looking at him and keeping an eye out. • We used the of Rhythym a lot in order to make all the shots consistent so it shows the same meaning as all the other shots. especially at the time 1:00 this was used in order to create a sense of Danger and to make sure that the shots made sense with the production.
  • 14. Ability to convey intended meaning/atmosphere • Reference where your edits created meaning and atmosphere. Reference specific examples • An example of where our edits created a sense of meaning is with the use of Darkness on the colour correction of the film, this was used in order to create a sense of suspense and to make the audience sort of wonder or guess what is going to happen. This happens at 1:38 where there is a wide shot on the actor this has been used in order to make the audience know that there is something looking at him which creates the sense of fear. One other example of where we used darkness on the colour correction is at 00:44, the atmosphere and the meaning which is created in this scene is the fact that scenery looks damp and dull this immediately indicates to the audience that the Film is horror and it makes them question what might happen later on. It also would make them ask questions and think a bit more about the film. The reason I feel this is because the location of the bridge and the cars that are flying past give it a little bit of atmosphere as it makes the audience get an idea of the Location of the film. • One other way in which we created atmosphere is the Locations that we chose for example at the start of the film at 00:05 seconds in theres a use of a birdseye view shot on the character in the film this would suggest that someones watching him and it shows who's in power throughout the film. It also creates a sense of Danger on the character. One other aspect of which the Locations create a sense of meaning is the way in which the woodland area fits in with the Horror genre as it is such a cliche location for other horror films. This is because it gives a creepy atmosphere towards the audience and it also represents mystery as its normally a dark and gloomy place to go. You can see this from the sequence at 1:31 and 2:33 with the bridge and the graffiti on the walls this represents rebellious territory a place where you shouldn't go. there is also a lot of build up towards the woodland scene which gives off a creepy effect on the audience. This is all helped with the use of Colour correction and contrast so that it creates the horror atmosphere.
  • 16. Feedback 1 • What did you like about the film? – What could have been improved in the editing process is that the effects in terms of colour could have been a little bit more darker (black and white more) so the film has a more creepy feel to it. • What improvements could have been made on the film? • What I liked about the editing was that the cuts were made in time with the actions including the quick fade out when Scott looks up and has the scream effect which made the scene look and feel realistic.
  • 17. Feedback 1 • What did you like about the editing of the film – What I liked about the editing was that the cuts were made in time with the actions including the quick fade out when Scott looks up and has the scream effect which made the scene look and feel realistic. • What improvements could have been made to the editing? • What could have been improved in the editing process is that the effects in terms of colour could have been a little bit more darker (black and white more) so the film has a more creepy feel to it.
  • 18. Feedback 2 • What did you like about the film? – • Good use of locations – • Fulfilled brief well – • Colour balancing worked nicely to add to atmosphere in exterior shots – • Good use of locations to diversify footage and develop tone and atmosphere • What improvements could have been made on the film? • • Could have established plot early in the film so we understand why he is running from something/someone • • White balance/light input could have been checked when filming to ensure shots do not differ from each other dramatically
  • 19. Feedback 2 • What did you like about the editing of the film – • Good post production techniques to give exterior shot near professional visual style – • Shots progress story – • Shots last an appropriate amount of time • What improvements could have been made to the editing? • • Shot of the underpass could have been cropped further to remove skater from view • • Further post-production editing techniques could have been used to minimise colour/light change between interior and exterior shots •
  • 20. Peer Feedback Summary • What do you agree with from your peer feedback? – I agree with that some of the shots weren't the same as there was quite a significant amount of Lighting that really killed the atmosphere of the film, I also agree that the fall in the film wasn't realistic. As i don't think it looked as believable as I would of hoped it would be.One other aspect of the feedback that I believe is the way that the plot of the film wasn't introduced quicker which made some audiences confused about what I was running from. One other aspect of the feedback that I agree with is that the shot of the underpass could of been cropped a lot more so you weren't able to see certain people in the background. I also agree that further post production editing techniques could of been implemented in order to make the product look a little less uneven. • What do you disagree with from your peer feedback? • The only aspect of the feedback that I disagree with is that the way that the darkness and the colour correction that we used was implemented so we didn't really need to make it any darker than it actually was.
  • 21. Peer Feedback Summary • What changes would you make to your film based upon your peer feedback and why? • The changes that I would make to my Production is that I will add better lighting on some of the shots as it didn't look as consistent as I would of wanted, one other way in which I would improve my Film is by making some acting sequences a little more realistic, this could make the audience believe the plot of the film. One other aspect of the film which I agree with is to add more shots in order to make the film have a plot to which the audience would be able to follow. I also agree that in some of the shots there are things as to which that needed to be cut out in order to make the film look that bit more professional and realistic. I also agree that there needs to be a lot more post production aspects in order to make the film look a lot scarier with regards to editing.