2. Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
Layout structure
Quality photos/ creative ideas with photography
Interesting and relatable content to the theme of the issue
• What improvements could have been made to the product?
Not immediately obvious that they're adverts
The preview article – little plain
Font could be bigger in certain areas
3. Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
USE OF COLOUR
Great photography
Clear layouts/ uncluttered
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
No range in model sizes
More variety in gender of models
More continuity
4. Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
Clear professional photos
Eye catching
Consistent design and aesthetic throughout
• What improvements could have been made to the
product?
More content
More variety in styles of clothing
More variety in font
5. Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer feedback?
• The continuity in design
• The positive affect from the use of colour
• Need for more variety in font
• Could do with more content
• What do you disagree with from your peer feedback?
• The lack of continuity in astatic
• Not imminently obvious the advert are adverts
• Preview article is visually plain
6. Peer Feedback Summary
After collecting my peer feedback I was very happy to see my design concepts was
taken the way I wanted it to be. The large use of colour had the creative affect that I
planned it too without my pages being cluttered. As well as my photography, the
quality of images was very important due to the magazine types being
'fashion/photography'. I wanted the images to be striking and eye catching and from
my peer feedback I believe I succeeded with this intent.
I received mixed reviews on my advertisements and also the idea of my magazine
having continuity. I do take the point on my adverts being a little plain, but I stand
behind my decisions as I did want the focal being the image and when I looked at
existing advertisements, there was rarely more text than the brand name/logo.
I would of liked more variety in models but I do believe I had a good variety for the
amount of content I had. One person said my magazine could do with more content,
and I do agree but due to a time limit I chose to go for quality rather than quantity.
