Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
"Mobiilioppiminen"
1. MOBIILIOPPIMINEN
Olkkari-hankkeen päätösseminaari
16.11.2012
Jari Laru, KT, luokanopettaja
Opettajankouluttaja: Oulun yliopisto, Yrittäjä: LaruX
http://www.jarilaru.eu
2. Taustani
• Ensimmäinen tietokone -82
• BBS harrastaja 1990-luvulla (ennen Internetiä)
• Luokanopettaja 2003
• Kasvatustieteiden tohtori 2012
• Opettajankouluttaja (tvt:n
opetuskäyttö, koulutusteknologia) ja tutkija
• Internet-yrittäjä (LaruX): www-
sivuja, konsultointia, luennointia
Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit (LET) is a part of Faculty of Education in the University of Oulu (www.let.oulu.fi). The members of this
research group have particular expertise in the integration of theoretical perspectives on the social, cognitive and motivational processes of learning and utilising
it in research-based design in various technology enhanced learning environments (mobile applications, social media, computer supported collaborative learning).
LET provides introductory, masters' program and postgraduate education of learning and educational technology, and has long-term experiences in researching
and teaching computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) in international contexts. LET is an active participant in several international networks (e.g. LEAF s
in Nordic countries), in research collaboration (e.g. Canada, Australia, The Netherlands) and in interdisciplinary developmental projects, such as multidisciplinary
research on human learning and technology. The LET has been a member of the KALEIDOSCOPE in Technology Enhanced Learning Network of Excellence, funded
by the EU (2004-2008).
8. 2002
“His 2002 paper with Roy
Pea, "Walk on the Wild Side,"
has been influential in
understanding the future
possibilities for wireless
handheld learning devices”
Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002).
A walk on the WILD side: how
wireless handhelds may
change CSCL, 51-60.
Retrieved from
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm
?id=1658616.1658624
9. Tulevaisuus on tänään
Dillenbourg, P. (2010), The
appeal of motionless devices in
a world where everything
moves. Keynote talk at the 6th
IEEE WMUTE 2010
Conference, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
, accessed on June 29, 2011 at
http://wmute2010.cl.ncu.edu.tw/
Pierre%20DILLENBOURG.pdf.
20. Konstruktivismi
Oppiminen nähdään laajasti ottaen
aktiivisena tietojen, merkityksien ja
käsityksien rakentamisena.
Nykyaikaisten
oppimisympäristöjen taustateoria
21. Oppiminen on erittäin
monimutkainen prosessi
Yksilö
Ympäristö
(konteksti, välineet Yhteisö
ym.)
22. From PPT by Jermann, P. Scripting collaboration with ManyScripts http://manyscripts.epfl.ch/
24. Opettajan tehtävä on
järjestää oppimistilanteita
– orkestroida..
Dillenbourg, P. (2010), The
appeal of motionless devices in
a world where everything
moves. Keynote talk at the 6th
IEEE WMUTE 2010
Conference, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
, accessed on June 29, 2011 at
http://wmute2010.cl.ncu.edu.tw/
Pierre%20DILLENBOURG.pdf.
25.
26. KESKUSTELE
• Mihin koulunne opetus perustuu?
– Tarkasti suunniteltu vs. Improvisoitu
– Opettajajohtoinen vs. Orkestroitu
– Yksilön työskentely vs. Kollaboraatio
– Jne.. (dikotomiat vain herätteenä)
28. Politiikka Oppilaat Infrastruktuuri
Text
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:School%27s_
http://www.slideshare.net/larux/tietotyon-p-haasteita/
everyday_life.jpg
29.
30.
31. Politiikka Oppilaat Teknologia
Text
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:School%27s_
http://www.slideshare.net/larux/tietotyon-p-haasteita/
everyday_life.jpg
33. KOULU JA OPPIMINEN 2010 LUVULLA
http://yle.fi/puhe/ohjelmat/puheen_aamu/professori_lonka_opettaja_on_monelle_oppilaalle_s
e_lahin_ihminen_3878.html
39. KESKUSTELE
• Miten oppilaitoksesi ottaa
huomioon HS:n hoksautuksen
työelämästä vuonna 2074?
•
• Mitä taitoja 2074 tarvitaan? Onko
se ulkoaoppimista ja oppikirjojen
mukaan opiskelua vai muuta?
43. Aims of the study I/II
The general focus of this doctoral
thesis is to apply theoretical ideas of
distributed cognition and scaffolding
for mobile computer supported
collaborative learning in authentic
contexts
44. Aims of the study II/II
• The first aim was to analyze the nature of collaboration
in the mobile technology supported settings of
collaborative learning (papers I and III-IV) and work
(paper II)
• The second aim was to experiment the kind of
scaffolding of mobile computer supported
collaboration that can enrich collaborative learning
(papers I,III-IV) and work (paper II)
• The third aim was to discuss the methodological issues
for studying social interactions and collaborative
learning in mobile computer supported activities (I-IV)
45. Research design
The research design combines
chracteristics from the design
based research (DBR), Case-
study approach (Yin, 2003) and
situated approach
(Greeno, 2006)
46. Theory
Inquiry learning Case III
Argumentative learning
Paper III
Instructional design
Case II Instructional design Core activity
2nd analysis
Main methods Core activity Blended learning EI
Results & findings
1st analysis Argumentative inquiry
Mann Whitney U-test Script
learning
Data Script Integrated learning script
Qualitative content
analysis Flyers, audio
recordings, mindmaps Integrated learning script
Context
Context Macro: Storyboard + tutors
Mobile tool Higher Education
Flyers
Fieldtrip (K12) Micro: Sentence openers
Data
Tools
Log
Mobile tool data, recordings, knowledge
test, wiki history, content
Case I Media uploader
2nd analysis Paper II Results & findings Google Reader
Main methods 1st analysis
Social software (students)
Social network analysis 1st analysis
Instructional design Media sharing
Data 2nd analysis
Weblog
Qualitative content Logs, interviews, questionnai Core activity Wiki
analysis res RSS Reader
Knowledge building Paper IV
Context Social software (class)
Mobile tool Script
Virtual master’s Course blog Main methods
FLE3mobile Macro: Free collaboration Course wiki
programme
Micro: sentence openers RSS aggregats Qualitative content
analysis (mixed)
Theory Bayesian modeling
FLE3 Tiernajack
Progressive inquiry learning
Flyers SmartLibrary Knowledge building
Preliminary Theory
Paper I analysis Theory (analytical lens)
Foundations Community of Practise
47. Laru, J. & Järvelä, S. (2008). Social patterns in mobile
technology mediated collaboration among members of the
professional distance education community. Educational
Media International Journal, 45(1),17-3.
48. Single task, free collaboration
Existing master’s programs
New master’s program
Knowledge building activity
Microscript
Collective task
50. Overall, the analyses revealed nonparticipative behaviour within the online
community.
The social network analysis revealed structural holes and sparse collaboration
among participants in the offline community. It was found that due to their
separated practices in the offline community, they didn’t have a need for mobile
collaboration tools in their practices.
51. Internal script External script Internal script(s)
Activity: Collaborative knowledge
building (progressive inquiry learning)
Nonparticipative
behavior
Co-operative learning Microscript: Knowledge building Self-study
ag
Activity: Argumentative knowledge
construction
- Integrated learning script - Emergent interaction
pattern(s)
prestructuring
Core activity
Post structuring
ag
Activities:
Conceptualizations, reflections, elab
orations, knowledge construction
CSCL Integrated learning script CSCL Emergent interaction
pattern(s)
ag
prestructuring
SWISH Core activity
ag Post structuring
ag
52. STUDY 2: FLYERS
Laru, J. & Järvelä, S. (2008). Social patterns in mobile
technology mediated collaboration among members of the
professional distance education community. Educational Media
International Journal, 45(1),17-3.
55. Although the results revealed several shortcomings in the types of
argumentation...
….In general, the use of the mobile tool likely promoted important
interaction during inquiry learning, but led to superficial
epistemological quality in the knowledge claim messages.
56. Internal script External script Internal script(s)
Activity: Collaborative knowledge
building (progressive inquiry learning)
Nonparticipative
behavior
Co-operative learning Microscript: Knowledge building Self-study
ag
Activity: Argumentative knowledge
construction
- Integrated learning script - Emergent interaction
pattern(s)
prestructuring
Core activity
Post structuring
ag
Activities:
Conceptualizations, reflections, elab
orations, knowledge construction
CSCL Integrated learning script CSCL Emergent interaction
pattern(s)
ag
prestructuring
SWISH Core activity
ag Post structuring
ag
57. Course blog and wiki
Mobile applications
Course level tools
D. Reflect & E. Review &
B.Reflect F. Co-construct
Phase: A.Ground C.Conceptualize elaborate evaluate
knowledge Course feed
Group level tools
Software:
Collaborative Solo Collaborative
Activity:
Lecture Discussion Phototaking Blogging Discussion Wikiwork
Multiple feeds
Merged feeds
Monitoring tools
G.Monitor Tools used to merge multiple RSS feeds
Figure 4. Socio-technological design of the course. The idea of making use of each others’
knowledge was operationalized in socio-technical design. It consisted of recurrent individual and collective phases in which students
used multiple Web 2.0 tools and mobile phones in concert to perform designed tasks. Retrieved from: Jari Laru, Piia Näykki, Sanna
Järvelä, Supporting small-group learning using multiple Web 2.0 tools: A case study in the higher education context, The Internet and
Higher Education, Available online 28 August 2011, ISSN 1096-7516, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.004.
59. Conceptual Conceptual
knowledge post- knowledge post-
test test
Knowledge
test analysis Results
Paired samples
t-test
Normalized Bayesian dependency & classification
learning gain modeling
Descriptive analysis
Analysis of Wiki
history
Analysis of the On task analysis
engagement
Discussions Shozu Flickr Wordpress Wikispaces Google Reader
60. In our case, we found that using social software tools together to perform multiple
tasks likely increased individual knowledge acquisition during the course.
Bayesian classification analysis revealed that the best predictors of good learning
outcomes were wiki-related activities.
61. Internal script External script Internal script(s)
Activity: Collaborative knowledge
building (progressive inquiry learning)
Nonparticipative
behavior
Co-operative learning Microscript: Knowledge building Self-study
ag
Activity: Argumentative knowledge
construction
- Integrated learning script - Emergent interaction
pattern(s)
prestructuring
Core activity
Post structuring
ag
Activities:
Conceptualizations, reflections, elab
orations, knowledge construction
CSCL Integrated learning script CSCL Emergent interaction
pattern(s)
ag
prestructuring
SWISH Core activity
ag Post structuring
ag
62. Comparison between experiments
Subtask
Topic 1 Subtask n
n+1
Topic 1 Subtask
Topic 2 Subtask n
n+1
X
Subtask
Topic 3 Subtask n
Topic Topic 2 n+1
Subtask
Topic 1 Subtask n
X n+1
Topic 3 Subtask
Topic 2 Subtask n
n+1
Subtask
Topic 3 Subtask n
n+1
Free Didactic envelopes (Dillenbourg, 2002) Swish splits (Dillenbourg & Jermann, 2006)