SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Phi-Coefficient 
Conceptual Explanation
A Phi coefficient is a non-parametric test of 
relationships that operates on two dichotomous 
(or dichotomized) variables. It intersects 
variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate 
whether there is a non-random pattern across 
the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to 
+1.
A Phi coefficient is a non-parametric test of 
relationships that operates on two dichotomous 
(or dichotomized) variables. It intersects 
variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate 
whether there is a non-random Dichotomous 
pattern across 
means that the 
the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. data can take Similar on 
to a 
only two values. 
parametric correlation coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to 
+1.
A Phi coefficient is a non-parametric test of 
relationships that operates on two dichotomous 
(or dichotomized) variables. It intersects 
variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate 
whether there is a non-random pattern across 
the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to 
+1. 
Like – 
• Male/Female 
• Yes/No 
• Opinion/Fact 
• Control/Treatment
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1.
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
What does 
this mean?
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
Here is an 
example 
Data Set
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1.
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
Two Dichotomous 
Variables
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 
B 
C 
D 
E 
F 
G 
H 
I 
J 
K 
L 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1.
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 
B 1 
C 1 
D 2 
E 2 
F 1 
G 2 
H 2 
I 2 
J 1 
K 1 
L 2 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1.
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1.
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
Male
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
Male
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
Female
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
Female
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
Single
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
Single
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
Married
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
Married
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1.
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
coefficient, the possible 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1.
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 
Single
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 
Single
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 
Single
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 
Single
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single 
1
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single 
1 
2
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single 
1 
2 
3
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single 
1 
2 
3 
4
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single 5
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single 5
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single 5 
1
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single 5 
1 
2
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single 5 
1 
2 
3
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single 5 
1 
2 
3 
4
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 
Single 5 
1 
2 
3 
4
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5 
1
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5 
1 
2
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5 
1 
2
Subjects Gender 
1= Male 
2= Female 
Marital Status 
1 = Single 
2 = Married 
A 1 2 
B 1 1 
C 1 1 
D 2 2 
E 2 2 
F 1 1 
G 2 2 
H 2 1 
I 2 2 
J 1 1 
K 1 1 
L 2 1 
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5 2
It intersects variables 
across a 2x2 matrix to 
estimate whether there is 
a non-random pattern 
across the four cells in the 
2x2 matrix. Similar to a 
parametric correlation 
GENDER 
coefficient, the possible 
Male Female 
values of a Phi coefficient 
range from -1 to 0 to +1. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5 2
Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, 
the possible values of a Phi coefficient range 
from -1 to 0 to +1.
A Phi coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is 
no systematic pattern across the 2x2 matrix. A 
negative Phi coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“lower’ coded values on the other variable. A 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on the other variable.
A Phi coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is 
no systematic pattern across the 2x2 matrix. A 
negative Phi coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable GENDER 
are associated with 
“lower’ coded values Male on the Female 
other variable. A 
Married 3 3 
positive MARITAL 
STATUS 
phi-Single coefficient 3 would 3 
indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on the other variable.
A Phi coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is 
no systematic pattern across the 2x2 matrix. A 
negative Phi coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which or 
“higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“lower’ coded values on the other variable. A 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on the other variable.
A Phi coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is 
no systematic pattern across the 2x2 matrix. A 
negative Phi coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which or 
“higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“lower’ coded values on the GENDER 
other variable. A 
positive phi-coefficient Male would Female 
indicate a 
systematic MARITAL 
pattern Married in which 5 “higher” 5 
coded 
STATUS 
Single 1 1 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on the other variable.
A Phi coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is 
no systematic pattern across the 2x2 matrix. A 
negative Phi coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which or 
“higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“lower’ coded values on the GENDER 
other variable. A 
positive phi-coefficient Male would Female 
indicate a 
systematic MARITAL 
pattern Married in which 5 “higher” 5 
coded 
STATUS 
Single 1 1 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on the other variable. 
Being male or female does not make you any 
more likely to be married or single
A Phi coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is 
no systematic pattern across the 2x2 matrix. A 
negative Phi coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which or 
“higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“lower’ coded values on the GENDER 
other variable. A 
positive phi-coefficient Male would Female 
indicate a 
systematic MARITAL 
pattern Married in which 5 “higher” 5 
coded 
STATUS 
Single 1 1 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on the other variable. 
Being male or female does not make you any 
more likely to be married or single
A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the diagonal cells.A 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on the other variable.
A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the diagonal cells. 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on the other variable.
A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the diagonal cells. 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 
Single
A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the diagonal cells. 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 
Single
A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the diagonal cells. 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 
Single 
For example
A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the diagonal cells. 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 4 
Single 5
A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the diagonal cells. 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 4 1 
Single 2 5
A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the diagonal cells. 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 4 1 
Single 2 5
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on the other variable. 
GENDER 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 4 1 
Single 2 5 
Phi- 
Coefficient 
+.507
In terms of how to interpret this value, here is a helpful rule of 
thumb: 
A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the diagonal cells. 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 4 1 
Single 2 5 
+.507 
Value of r Strength of relationship 
-1.0 to -0.5 or 1.0 to 0.5 Strong 
-0.5 to -0.3 or 0.3 to 0.5 Moderate 
-0.3 to -0.1 or 0.1 to 0.3 Weak 
-0.1 to 0.1 None or very weak
In terms of how to interpret this value, here is a helpful rule of 
thumb: 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on the other variable. 
Value of r Strength of relationship 
-1.0 to -0.5 or 1.0 to 0.5 Strong 
-0.5 to -0.3 or 0.3 to 0.5 Moderate 
-0.3 to -0.1 or 0.1 to 0.3 Weak 
-0.1 to 0.1 None or very weak 
GENDER 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 4 1 
Single 2 5 
+.507 
So, the interpretation would be, that there is a strong relationship 
between marital status and gender with being male making it 
more likely you are married and being female making it more likely 
to be single.
In terms of how to interpret this value, here is a helpful rule of 
thumb: 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on the other variable. 
Value of r Strength of relationship 
-1.0 to -0.5 or 1.0 to 0.5 Strong 
-0.5 to -0.3 or 0.3 to 0.5 Moderate 
-0.3 to -0.1 or 0.1 to 0.3 Weak 
-0.1 to 0.1 None or very weak 
GENDER 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 4 1 
Single 2 5 
+.507 
So, the interpretation would be, that there is a strong relationship 
between marital status and gender with being male making it 
more likely you are married and being female making it more likely 
to be single.
In terms of how to interpret this value, here is a helpful rule of 
thumb: 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on the other variable. 
Value of r Strength of relationship 
-1.0 to -0.5 or 1.0 to 0.5 Strong 
-0.5 to -0.3 or 0.3 to 0.5 Moderate 
-0.3 to -0.1 or 0.1 to 0.3 Weak 
-0.1 to 0.1 None or very weak 
GENDER 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 4 1 
Single 2 5 
+.507 
So, the interpretation would be, that there is a strong relationship 
between marital status and gender with being male making it 
more likely you are married and being female making it more likely 
you are single.
A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on the other variable.
A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 
Single
A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 
Single
A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5 2
A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5 2 
Phi- 
Coefficient 
-.507
A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are GENDER 
associated with 
“higher” coded values on Male the other Female 
variable. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5 2 
Phi- 
Coefficient 
-.507 
So, the interpretation would be, that there is a strong relationship 
between marital status and gender with being male making it 
more likely that you are single and being female making it more 
likely you are married.
A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are GENDER 
associated with 
“higher” coded values on Male the other Female 
variable. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5 2 
Phi- 
Coefficient 
-.507 
So, the interpretation would be, that there is a strong relationship 
between marital status and gender with being male making it 
more likely that you are single and being female making it more 
likely you are married.
A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are GENDER 
associated with 
“higher” coded values on Male the other Female 
variable. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5 2 
Phi- 
Coefficient 
-.507 
So, the interpretation would be, that there is a strong relationship 
between marital status and gender with being male making it 
more likely that you are single and being female making it more 
likely you are married.
A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are GENDER 
associated with 
“higher” coded values on Male the other Female 
variable. 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5 2 
Phi- 
Coefficient 
-.507 
So, the interpretation would be, that there is a strong relationship 
between marital status and gender with being male making it 
more likely that you are single and being female making it more 
likely you are married.
A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that 
most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A 
positive phi-coefficient would indicate a 
systematic pattern in which “higher” coded 
values on one variable are associated with 
“higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. 
Note: the sign (+ or -) is irrelevant. The main thing to consider is 
the strength of the relationship between the two variables and 
then look at the 2x2 matrix to determine what it means. 
Male Female 
MARITAL 
STATUS 
Married 1 4 
Single 5 2 
Phi- 
Coefficient 
-.507
Phi Coefficient Example 
• A researcher wishes to determine if a significant 
relationship exists between the gender of the 
worker and if they experience pain while 
performing an electronics assembly task. 
• One question asks “Do you experience pain 
while performing the assembly task? Yes No” 
• The second question asks “What is your 
gender? ___ Male ___ Female”
• A researcher wishes to determine if a significant 
relationship exists between the gender of the 
worker and if they experience pain while 
performing an electronics assembly task. 
e question asks “Do you experience pain while 
performing the assembly task? Yes No” 
• The second question asks “What is your 
gender? ___ Male ___ Female”
• A researcher wishes to determine if a significant 
relationship exists between the gender of the 
worker and if they experience pain while 
performing an electronics assembly task. 
e question asks “Do you experience pain while 
performing the assembly task? Yes No” 
• The second question asks “What is your 
gender? ___ Male ___ Female”
Two survey questions are asked of the 
workers: 
• One question asks “Do you experience 
pain while performing the assembly 
task? Yes No” 
• The second question asks “What is your 
gender? ___ Male ___ Female”
Two survey questions are asked of the 
workers: 
• “Do you experience pain while 
performing the assembly task? Yes No” 
• The second question asks “What is your 
gender? ___ Male ___ Female”
Two survey questions are asked of the 
workers: 
• “Do you experience pain while 
performing the assembly task? Yes No” 
• “What is your gender? 
___ Female ___ Male” 
adsfj;lakjdfs;lakjsdf;lakdsjfa
Step 1: Null and Alternative Hypotheses 
• Ho: There is no relationship 
between the gender of the worker 
and if they feel pain while 
performing the task. 
• H1: There is a significant 
relationship between the gender of 
the worker and if they feel pain 
while performing the task.
Step 1: Null and Alternative Hypotheses 
• Ho: There is no relationship 
between the gender of the worker 
and if they feel pain while 
performing the task. 
• H1: There is a significant 
relationship between the gender of 
the worker and if they feel pain 
while performing the task.
Step 1: Null and Alternative Hypotheses 
• Ho: There is no relationship 
between the gender of the worker 
and if they feel pain while 
performing the task. 
• H1: There is a significant 
relationship between the gender of 
the worker and if they feel pain 
while performing the task.
Step 2: Determine dependent and 
independent variables and their formats.
Step 2: Determine dependent and 
independent variables and their formats.
Step 2: Determine dependent and 
independent variables and their formats. 
• Gender is the independent variable 
• Feeling pain is dichotomous, dependent
Step 2: Determine dependent and 
independent variables and their formats. 
• Gender is the independent variable 
• Feeling pain is dichotomous, dependent 
An independent variable 
is the variable doing the 
causing or influencing
Step 2: Determine dependent and 
independent variables and their formats. 
• Gender is the independent variable 
• Feeling pain is the dependent variable
Step 2: Determine dependent and 
independent variables and their formats. 
• Gender is the independent variable 
• Feeling pain is the dependent variable
Step 2: Determine dependent and 
independent variables and their formats. 
• Gender is the independent variable 
• Feeling pain is the dependent variable 
A dependent variable is 
the thing being caused 
or influenced by the 
independent variable
Step 2: Determine dependent and 
independent variables and their formats. 
• Gender is the independent variable 
• Feeling pain is the dependent variable
Step 2: Determine dependent and 
independent variables and their formats. 
• Gender is the independent variable 
• Feeling pain is the dependent variable 
• Gender is a dichotomous variable
Step 2: Determine dependent and 
independent variables and their formats. 
• Gender is the independent variable 
• Feeling pain is the dependent variable 
• Gender is a dichotomous variable 
In this study it can only 
take on two variables: 
1 = Male 
2 = Female
Step 2: Determine dependent and 
independent variables and their formats. 
• Gender is the independent variable 
• Feeling pain is the dependent variable 
• Gender is a dichotomous variable 
• Feeling pain is a dichotomous variable
Step 2: Determine dependent and 
independent variables and their formats. 
• Gender is the independent variable 
• Feeling pain is the dependent variable 
• Gender is a dichotomous variable 
• Feeling pain is a dichotomous variable 
In this study it can only 
take on two variables: 
1 = Feel Pain 
2 = Don’t Feel Pain
Step 3: Choose test statistic
Step 3: Choose test statistic 
• Because we are investigating the relationship between 
two dichotomous variables, the appropriate test statistic 
is the Phi Coefficient
Step 4: Run the Test 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes 
to the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No 
to the pain item (8)
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes 
to the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No 
to the pain item (8)
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes 
to the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No 
to the pain item (8)
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes 
to the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No 
to the pain item (8)
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to 
the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No 
to the pain item (8)
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to 
the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No 
to the pain item (8)
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to 
the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No to 
the pain item (8) 
Males Females Total 
Yes 4 B E 
No C D F 
Total G H
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to 
the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No to 
the pain item (8) 
Males Females Total 
Yes 4 6 E 
No C D F 
Total G H
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to 
the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No to 
the pain item (8) 
Males Females Total 
Yes 4 6 E 
No 11 D F 
Total G H
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to 
the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No to 
the pain item (8) 
Males Females Total 
Yes 4 6 E 
No 11 8 F 
Total G H
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to 
the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No to 
the pain item (8) 
Males Females Total 
Yes 4 6 E 
No 11 8 F 
Total G H
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to 
the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No to 
the pain item (8) 
Males Females Total 
Yes 4 6 E 
No 11 8 F 
Total 15 H
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to 
the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No to 
the pain item (8) 
Males Females Total 
Yes 4 6 E 
No 11 8 F 
Total 14 H
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to 
the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No to 
the pain item (8) 
Males Females Total 
Yes 4 6 E 
No 11 8 F 
Total 14 14
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to 
the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No to 
the pain item (8) 
Males Females Total 
Yes 1 12 E 
No 13 2 F 
Total 14 14
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to 
the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No to 
the pain item (8) 
Males Females Total 
Yes 1 12 13 
No 13 2 F 
Total 14 14
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to 
the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No to 
the pain item (8) 
Males Females Total 
Yes 1 12 13 
No 13 2 F 
Total 12 14
Step 4: Run the Test 
• The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: 
– Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to 
the pain item (4) 
– Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to 
the pain item (6) 
– Box C contains the number of Males that said No to 
the pain item (11) 
– Box D contains the number of Females that said No to 
the pain item (8) 
Males Females Total 
Yes 1 12 13 
No 13 2 15 
Total 12 14
Phi Coefficient Test Formula
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
bc ad 
(  
) 
efgh 
( ) 
 
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 
No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗2) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= .788
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 
No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
ퟏퟐ∗13 −(1∗2) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= .788
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 
No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗ퟏퟑ −(1∗2) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= .788
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 
No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(ퟏ∗2) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= .788
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 
No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗ퟐ) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= .788
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 
No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(풆푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗2) 
ퟏퟓ∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= .788
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 
No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒풇푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗2) 
15∗ퟏퟑ∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= .788
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 
No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗2) 
15∗13∗ퟏퟒ∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= .788
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 
No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗2) 
15∗13∗14∗ퟏퟒ 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= .788
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 15 
No c = 13 d = 2 f = 13 
Total g = 14 h =14 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗2) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
ퟏퟓퟒ.ퟎ 
ퟏퟗퟓ.ퟓ 
= .788
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes - Pain a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 
No - Pain c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗2) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= -.788
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes - Pain a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 
No - Pain c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
Result: there is a strong relationship between gender and feeling pain with 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗2) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= -.788 
females feeling more pain than males.
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes - Pain a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 
No - Pain c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗2) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= -.788 
Remember that with the Phi-coefficient the sign (-/+) is irrelevant
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes - Pain a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 
No - Pain c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗2) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= -.788 
with a different sign.
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes - Pain a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 
No - Pain c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗2) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= -.788 
with a different sign.
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes - Pain a = 12 b = 1 e = 13 
No - Pain c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗2) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= -.788 
with a different sign.
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes - Pain a = 12 b = 1 e = 13 
No - Pain c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗2) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= -.788 
with a different sign.
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes - Pain a = 12 b = 1 e = 13 
No - Pain c = 2 d = 13 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
12∗13 −(1∗2) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= -.788 
with a different sign.
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes - Pain a = 12 b = 1 e = 13 
No - Pain c = 2 d = 13 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
ퟏퟐ∗ퟏퟑ −(ퟏ∗ퟐ) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= -.788 
with a different sign.
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes - Pain a = 12 b = 1 e = 13 
No - Pain c = 2 d = 13 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
ퟏ∗ퟐ −(ퟏퟐ∗ퟏퟑ) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= -.788 
with a different sign.
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes - Pain a = 12 b = 1 e = 13 
No - Pain c = 2 d = 13 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
ퟏ∗ퟐ −(ퟏퟐ∗ퟏퟑ) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= +.788 
with a different sign.
Phi Coefficient Test Formula 
Males Females Total 
Yes - Pain a = 12 b = 1 e = 13 
No - Pain c = 2 d = 13 f = 15 
Total g = 14 h =14 
Φ = 
(푏푐 −푎푑) 
(푒푓푔ℎ) 
= 
ퟏ∗ퟐ −(ퟏퟐ∗ퟏퟑ) 
15∗13∗14∗14 
= 
154.0 
195.5 
= +.788 
The Result is the Same: there is a strong relationship between gender and 
feeling pain with females feeling more pain than males.
Step 5: Conclusions
Step 5: Conclusions 
There is a strong relationship between gender and pain 
• Both males and females have pain (or no pain) at equal 
frequencies.
Step 5: Conclusions 
There is a strong relationship between gender and pain 
with more females reporting pain than males. 
• Both males and females have pain (or no pain) at equal 
frequencies.
Step 5: Conclusions 
There is a strong relationship between gender and pain 
with more females reporting pain than males. 
• Both males and females have pain (or no pain) at equal 
frequencies. 
Males Females 
Yes - Pain 1 12 
No - Pain 13 2
Step 5: Conclusions 
There is a strong relationship between gender and pain 
with more females reporting pain than males. 
• Both males and females have pain (or no pain) at equal 
frequencies. 
Males Females 
Yes - Pain 1 12 
No - Pain 13 2
Step 5: Conclusions 
There is a strong relationship between gender and pain 
with more females reporting pain than males. 
• Both males and females have pain (or no pain) at equal 
frequencies. 
Males Females 
Yes - Pain 1 12 
No - Pain 13 2

More Related Content

What's hot

Point biserial correlation
Point biserial correlationPoint biserial correlation
Point biserial correlation
Ken Plummer
 
Normal Curve and Standard Scores
Normal Curve and Standard ScoresNormal Curve and Standard Scores
Normal Curve and Standard Scores
Jenewel Azuelo
 
Correlation research design presentation 2015
Correlation research design presentation 2015Correlation research design presentation 2015
Correlation research design presentation 2015
Syed imran ali
 
Descriptive statistics ppt
Descriptive statistics pptDescriptive statistics ppt
Descriptive statistics ppt
Titus Mutambu Mweta
 
What is a kendall's tau?
What is a kendall's tau?What is a kendall's tau?
What is a kendall's tau?
Ken Plummer
 
Biserial Correlation - Thiyagu
Biserial Correlation - ThiyaguBiserial Correlation - Thiyagu
Biserial Correlation - Thiyagu
Thiyagu K
 
Validity and its types
Validity and its typesValidity and its types
Validity and its types
BibiNadia1
 
Spearman’s rank correlation
Spearman’s rank correlation Spearman’s rank correlation
Spearman’s rank correlation
PritikaNeupane
 
Introduction to t-tests (statistics)
Introduction to t-tests (statistics)Introduction to t-tests (statistics)
Introduction to t-tests (statistics)
Dr Bryan Mills
 
Tetrachoric Correlation - Thiyagu
Tetrachoric Correlation - ThiyaguTetrachoric Correlation - Thiyagu
Tetrachoric Correlation - Thiyagu
Thiyagu K
 
Measures of Variability
Measures of VariabilityMeasures of Variability
Measures of Variability
Mary Krystle Dawn Sulleza
 
Measures of Variability
Measures of VariabilityMeasures of Variability
Measures of Variability
jasondroesch
 
The wilcoxon matched pairs signed-ranks test
The wilcoxon matched pairs signed-ranks testThe wilcoxon matched pairs signed-ranks test
The wilcoxon matched pairs signed-ranks test
Regent University
 
Reporting a Factorial ANOVA
Reporting a Factorial ANOVAReporting a Factorial ANOVA
Reporting a Factorial ANOVA
Ken Plummer
 
Chi square
Chi squareChi square
Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale
Stanford-Binet Intelligence ScaleStanford-Binet Intelligence Scale
Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale
MauliRastogi
 
Measures of Variation
Measures of VariationMeasures of Variation
Measures of Variation
Rica Joy Pontilar
 
z-scores
z-scoresz-scores
Null hypothesis for Kendall's Tau (Independence)
Null hypothesis for Kendall's Tau (Independence)Null hypothesis for Kendall's Tau (Independence)
Null hypothesis for Kendall's Tau (Independence)
Ken Plummer
 

What's hot (20)

Point biserial correlation
Point biserial correlationPoint biserial correlation
Point biserial correlation
 
Normal Curve and Standard Scores
Normal Curve and Standard ScoresNormal Curve and Standard Scores
Normal Curve and Standard Scores
 
Correlation research design presentation 2015
Correlation research design presentation 2015Correlation research design presentation 2015
Correlation research design presentation 2015
 
Descriptive statistics ppt
Descriptive statistics pptDescriptive statistics ppt
Descriptive statistics ppt
 
What is a kendall's tau?
What is a kendall's tau?What is a kendall's tau?
What is a kendall's tau?
 
Biserial Correlation - Thiyagu
Biserial Correlation - ThiyaguBiserial Correlation - Thiyagu
Biserial Correlation - Thiyagu
 
Validity and its types
Validity and its typesValidity and its types
Validity and its types
 
Spearman’s rank correlation
Spearman’s rank correlation Spearman’s rank correlation
Spearman’s rank correlation
 
Introduction to t-tests (statistics)
Introduction to t-tests (statistics)Introduction to t-tests (statistics)
Introduction to t-tests (statistics)
 
Reliability
ReliabilityReliability
Reliability
 
Tetrachoric Correlation - Thiyagu
Tetrachoric Correlation - ThiyaguTetrachoric Correlation - Thiyagu
Tetrachoric Correlation - Thiyagu
 
Measures of Variability
Measures of VariabilityMeasures of Variability
Measures of Variability
 
Measures of Variability
Measures of VariabilityMeasures of Variability
Measures of Variability
 
The wilcoxon matched pairs signed-ranks test
The wilcoxon matched pairs signed-ranks testThe wilcoxon matched pairs signed-ranks test
The wilcoxon matched pairs signed-ranks test
 
Reporting a Factorial ANOVA
Reporting a Factorial ANOVAReporting a Factorial ANOVA
Reporting a Factorial ANOVA
 
Chi square
Chi squareChi square
Chi square
 
Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale
Stanford-Binet Intelligence ScaleStanford-Binet Intelligence Scale
Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale
 
Measures of Variation
Measures of VariationMeasures of Variation
Measures of Variation
 
z-scores
z-scoresz-scores
z-scores
 
Null hypothesis for Kendall's Tau (Independence)
Null hypothesis for Kendall's Tau (Independence)Null hypothesis for Kendall's Tau (Independence)
Null hypothesis for Kendall's Tau (Independence)
 

Similar to What is a phi coefficient?

COORELATION
COORELATIONCOORELATION
COORELATION
SHALINIrajput7
 
Biology_FundamentalsOfGenetics(A).pdf
Biology_FundamentalsOfGenetics(A).pdfBiology_FundamentalsOfGenetics(A).pdf
Biology_FundamentalsOfGenetics(A).pdf
MehediBabu1
 
Please answer all questionsDefine1. Wild type –2. Epistasis –.pdf
Please answer all questionsDefine1. Wild type –2. Epistasis –.pdfPlease answer all questionsDefine1. Wild type –2. Epistasis –.pdf
Please answer all questionsDefine1. Wild type –2. Epistasis –.pdf
dhavalbl38
 
Genes and heredity
Genes and heredityGenes and heredity
Genes and heredity
gracie bradley
 
Probability+and+heredity
Probability+and+heredityProbability+and+heredity
Probability+and+heredityHamdy Karim
 
Linkageandcrossingover 101216024248-phpapp01
Linkageandcrossingover 101216024248-phpapp01Linkageandcrossingover 101216024248-phpapp01
Linkageandcrossingover 101216024248-phpapp01akhlaq12
 

Similar to What is a phi coefficient? (7)

COORELATION
COORELATIONCOORELATION
COORELATION
 
Biology_FundamentalsOfGenetics(A).pdf
Biology_FundamentalsOfGenetics(A).pdfBiology_FundamentalsOfGenetics(A).pdf
Biology_FundamentalsOfGenetics(A).pdf
 
Please answer all questionsDefine1. Wild type –2. Epistasis –.pdf
Please answer all questionsDefine1. Wild type –2. Epistasis –.pdfPlease answer all questionsDefine1. Wild type –2. Epistasis –.pdf
Please answer all questionsDefine1. Wild type –2. Epistasis –.pdf
 
Crosstabs
CrosstabsCrosstabs
Crosstabs
 
Genes and heredity
Genes and heredityGenes and heredity
Genes and heredity
 
Probability+and+heredity
Probability+and+heredityProbability+and+heredity
Probability+and+heredity
 
Linkageandcrossingover 101216024248-phpapp01
Linkageandcrossingover 101216024248-phpapp01Linkageandcrossingover 101216024248-phpapp01
Linkageandcrossingover 101216024248-phpapp01
 

More from Ken Plummer

Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
Ken Plummer
 
Learn About Range - Copyright updated
Learn About Range - Copyright updatedLearn About Range - Copyright updated
Learn About Range - Copyright updated
Ken Plummer
 
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright UpdatedInferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
Ken Plummer
 
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright UpdatedDiff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
Ken Plummer
 
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updatedNormal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
Ken Plummer
 
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updatedNormal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
Ken Plummer
 
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updated
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updatedNature of the data practice - Copyright updated
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updated
Ken Plummer
 
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updatedNature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
Ken Plummer
 
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updated
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updatedMode practice 1 - Copyright updated
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updated
Ken Plummer
 
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updatedNature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
Ken Plummer
 
Dichotomous or scaled
Dichotomous or scaledDichotomous or scaled
Dichotomous or scaled
Ken Plummer
 
Skewed less than 30 (ties)
Skewed less than 30 (ties)Skewed less than 30 (ties)
Skewed less than 30 (ties)
Ken Plummer
 
Skewed sample size less than 30
Skewed sample size less than 30Skewed sample size less than 30
Skewed sample size less than 30
Ken Plummer
 
Ordinal (ties)
Ordinal (ties)Ordinal (ties)
Ordinal (ties)
Ken Plummer
 
Ordinal and nominal
Ordinal and nominalOrdinal and nominal
Ordinal and nominal
Ken Plummer
 
Relationship covariates
Relationship   covariatesRelationship   covariates
Relationship covariates
Ken Plummer
 
Relationship nature of data
Relationship nature of dataRelationship nature of data
Relationship nature of data
Ken Plummer
 
Number of variables (predictive)
Number of variables (predictive)Number of variables (predictive)
Number of variables (predictive)
Ken Plummer
 
Levels of the iv
Levels of the ivLevels of the iv
Levels of the iv
Ken Plummer
 
Independent variables (2)
Independent variables (2)Independent variables (2)
Independent variables (2)
Ken Plummer
 

More from Ken Plummer (20)

Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
 
Learn About Range - Copyright updated
Learn About Range - Copyright updatedLearn About Range - Copyright updated
Learn About Range - Copyright updated
 
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright UpdatedInferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
 
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright UpdatedDiff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
 
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updatedNormal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
 
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updatedNormal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
 
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updated
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updatedNature of the data practice - Copyright updated
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updated
 
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updatedNature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
 
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updated
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updatedMode practice 1 - Copyright updated
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updated
 
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updatedNature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
 
Dichotomous or scaled
Dichotomous or scaledDichotomous or scaled
Dichotomous or scaled
 
Skewed less than 30 (ties)
Skewed less than 30 (ties)Skewed less than 30 (ties)
Skewed less than 30 (ties)
 
Skewed sample size less than 30
Skewed sample size less than 30Skewed sample size less than 30
Skewed sample size less than 30
 
Ordinal (ties)
Ordinal (ties)Ordinal (ties)
Ordinal (ties)
 
Ordinal and nominal
Ordinal and nominalOrdinal and nominal
Ordinal and nominal
 
Relationship covariates
Relationship   covariatesRelationship   covariates
Relationship covariates
 
Relationship nature of data
Relationship nature of dataRelationship nature of data
Relationship nature of data
 
Number of variables (predictive)
Number of variables (predictive)Number of variables (predictive)
Number of variables (predictive)
 
Levels of the iv
Levels of the ivLevels of the iv
Levels of the iv
 
Independent variables (2)
Independent variables (2)Independent variables (2)
Independent variables (2)
 

Recently uploaded

CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdfCACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
camakaiclarkmusic
 
World environment day ppt For 5 June 2024
World environment day ppt For 5 June 2024World environment day ppt For 5 June 2024
World environment day ppt For 5 June 2024
ak6969907
 
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
Levi Shapiro
 
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments UnitDigital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
chanes7
 
Group Presentation 2 Economics.Ariana Buscigliopptx
Group Presentation 2 Economics.Ariana BuscigliopptxGroup Presentation 2 Economics.Ariana Buscigliopptx
Group Presentation 2 Economics.Ariana Buscigliopptx
ArianaBusciglio
 
S1-Introduction-Biopesticides in ICM.pptx
S1-Introduction-Biopesticides in ICM.pptxS1-Introduction-Biopesticides in ICM.pptx
S1-Introduction-Biopesticides in ICM.pptx
tarandeep35
 
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
IreneSebastianRueco1
 
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdfUnit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Thiyagu K
 
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat  Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionExecutive Directors Chat  Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
TechSoup
 
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental DesignDigital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
amberjdewit93
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
EverAndrsGuerraGuerr
 
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion DesignsDigital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
chanes7
 
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHatAzure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Scholarhat
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
Sandy Millin
 
Aficamten in HCM (SEQUOIA HCM TRIAL 2024)
Aficamten in HCM (SEQUOIA HCM TRIAL 2024)Aficamten in HCM (SEQUOIA HCM TRIAL 2024)
Aficamten in HCM (SEQUOIA HCM TRIAL 2024)
Ashish Kohli
 
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9  .docxAcetabularia Information For Class 9  .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
vaibhavrinwa19
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Thiyagu K
 
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe..."Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
SACHIN R KONDAGURI
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
Academy of Science of South Africa
 

Recently uploaded (20)

CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdfCACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
 
World environment day ppt For 5 June 2024
World environment day ppt For 5 June 2024World environment day ppt For 5 June 2024
World environment day ppt For 5 June 2024
 
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
 
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments UnitDigital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
 
Group Presentation 2 Economics.Ariana Buscigliopptx
Group Presentation 2 Economics.Ariana BuscigliopptxGroup Presentation 2 Economics.Ariana Buscigliopptx
Group Presentation 2 Economics.Ariana Buscigliopptx
 
S1-Introduction-Biopesticides in ICM.pptx
S1-Introduction-Biopesticides in ICM.pptxS1-Introduction-Biopesticides in ICM.pptx
S1-Introduction-Biopesticides in ICM.pptx
 
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
 
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdfUnit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
 
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat  Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionExecutive Directors Chat  Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
 
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental DesignDigital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
 
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion DesignsDigital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
Digital Artifact 2 - Investigating Pavilion Designs
 
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHatAzure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
 
Aficamten in HCM (SEQUOIA HCM TRIAL 2024)
Aficamten in HCM (SEQUOIA HCM TRIAL 2024)Aficamten in HCM (SEQUOIA HCM TRIAL 2024)
Aficamten in HCM (SEQUOIA HCM TRIAL 2024)
 
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9  .docxAcetabularia Information For Class 9  .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
 
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe..."Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
 

What is a phi coefficient?

  • 2. A Phi coefficient is a non-parametric test of relationships that operates on two dichotomous (or dichotomized) variables. It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1.
  • 3. A Phi coefficient is a non-parametric test of relationships that operates on two dichotomous (or dichotomized) variables. It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random Dichotomous pattern across means that the the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. data can take Similar on to a only two values. parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1.
  • 4. A Phi coefficient is a non-parametric test of relationships that operates on two dichotomous (or dichotomized) variables. It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. Like – • Male/Female • Yes/No • Opinion/Fact • Control/Treatment
  • 5. It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1.
  • 6. It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. What does this mean?
  • 7. It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. Here is an example Data Set
  • 8. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1.
  • 9. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. Two Dichotomous Variables
  • 10. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A B C D E F G H I J K L It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1.
  • 11. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 B 1 C 1 D 2 E 2 F 1 G 2 H 2 I 2 J 1 K 1 L 2 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1.
  • 12. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1.
  • 13. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. Male
  • 14. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. Male
  • 15. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. Female
  • 16. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. Female
  • 17. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. Single
  • 18. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. Single
  • 19. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. Married
  • 20. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. Married
  • 21. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1.
  • 22. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1.
  • 23. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married Single
  • 24. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married Single
  • 25. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married Single
  • 26. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married Single
  • 27. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single
  • 28. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single
  • 29. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single 1
  • 30. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single 1 2
  • 31. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single 1 2 3
  • 32. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single 1 2 3 4
  • 33. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single 1 2 3 4 5
  • 34. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single 1 2 3 4 5
  • 35. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single 5
  • 36. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single 5
  • 37. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single 5 1
  • 38. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single 5 1 2
  • 39. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single 5 1 2 3
  • 40. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single 5 1 2 3 4
  • 41. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 Single 5 1 2 3 4
  • 42. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5
  • 43. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5
  • 44. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5
  • 45. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5 1
  • 46. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5 1 2
  • 47. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5 1 2
  • 48. Subjects Gender 1= Male 2= Female Marital Status 1 = Single 2 = Married A 1 2 B 1 1 C 1 1 D 2 2 E 2 2 F 1 1 G 2 2 H 2 1 I 2 2 J 1 1 K 1 1 L 2 1 It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5 2
  • 49. It intersects variables across a 2x2 matrix to estimate whether there is a non-random pattern across the four cells in the 2x2 matrix. Similar to a parametric correlation GENDER coefficient, the possible Male Female values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5 2
  • 50. Similar to a parametric correlation coefficient, the possible values of a Phi coefficient range from -1 to 0 to +1.
  • 51. A Phi coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is no systematic pattern across the 2x2 matrix. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “lower’ coded values on the other variable. A positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on the other variable.
  • 52. A Phi coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is no systematic pattern across the 2x2 matrix. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable GENDER are associated with “lower’ coded values Male on the Female other variable. A Married 3 3 positive MARITAL STATUS phi-Single coefficient 3 would 3 indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on the other variable.
  • 53. A Phi coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is no systematic pattern across the 2x2 matrix. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which or “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “lower’ coded values on the other variable. A positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on the other variable.
  • 54. A Phi coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is no systematic pattern across the 2x2 matrix. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which or “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “lower’ coded values on the GENDER other variable. A positive phi-coefficient Male would Female indicate a systematic MARITAL pattern Married in which 5 “higher” 5 coded STATUS Single 1 1 values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on the other variable.
  • 55. A Phi coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is no systematic pattern across the 2x2 matrix. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which or “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “lower’ coded values on the GENDER other variable. A positive phi-coefficient Male would Female indicate a systematic MARITAL pattern Married in which 5 “higher” 5 coded STATUS Single 1 1 values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on the other variable. Being male or female does not make you any more likely to be married or single
  • 56. A Phi coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is no systematic pattern across the 2x2 matrix. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which or “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “lower’ coded values on the GENDER other variable. A positive phi-coefficient Male would Female indicate a systematic MARITAL pattern Married in which 5 “higher” 5 coded STATUS Single 1 1 values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on the other variable. Being male or female does not make you any more likely to be married or single
  • 57. A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the diagonal cells.A positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on the other variable.
  • 58. A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the diagonal cells. positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on the other variable.
  • 59. A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the diagonal cells. positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married Single
  • 60. A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the diagonal cells. positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married Single
  • 61. A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the diagonal cells. positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married Single For example
  • 62. A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the diagonal cells. positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married 4 Single 5
  • 63. A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the diagonal cells. positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married 4 1 Single 2 5
  • 64. A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the diagonal cells. positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married 4 1 Single 2 5
  • 65. positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on the other variable. GENDER Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married 4 1 Single 2 5 Phi- Coefficient +.507
  • 66. In terms of how to interpret this value, here is a helpful rule of thumb: A positive Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the diagonal cells. positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married 4 1 Single 2 5 +.507 Value of r Strength of relationship -1.0 to -0.5 or 1.0 to 0.5 Strong -0.5 to -0.3 or 0.3 to 0.5 Moderate -0.3 to -0.1 or 0.1 to 0.3 Weak -0.1 to 0.1 None or very weak
  • 67. In terms of how to interpret this value, here is a helpful rule of thumb: positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on the other variable. Value of r Strength of relationship -1.0 to -0.5 or 1.0 to 0.5 Strong -0.5 to -0.3 or 0.3 to 0.5 Moderate -0.3 to -0.1 or 0.1 to 0.3 Weak -0.1 to 0.1 None or very weak GENDER Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married 4 1 Single 2 5 +.507 So, the interpretation would be, that there is a strong relationship between marital status and gender with being male making it more likely you are married and being female making it more likely to be single.
  • 68. In terms of how to interpret this value, here is a helpful rule of thumb: positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on the other variable. Value of r Strength of relationship -1.0 to -0.5 or 1.0 to 0.5 Strong -0.5 to -0.3 or 0.3 to 0.5 Moderate -0.3 to -0.1 or 0.1 to 0.3 Weak -0.1 to 0.1 None or very weak GENDER Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married 4 1 Single 2 5 +.507 So, the interpretation would be, that there is a strong relationship between marital status and gender with being male making it more likely you are married and being female making it more likely to be single.
  • 69. In terms of how to interpret this value, here is a helpful rule of thumb: positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on the other variable. Value of r Strength of relationship -1.0 to -0.5 or 1.0 to 0.5 Strong -0.5 to -0.3 or 0.3 to 0.5 Moderate -0.3 to -0.1 or 0.1 to 0.3 Weak -0.1 to 0.1 None or very weak GENDER Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married 4 1 Single 2 5 +.507 So, the interpretation would be, that there is a strong relationship between marital status and gender with being male making it more likely you are married and being female making it more likely you are single.
  • 70. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on the other variable.
  • 71. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married Single
  • 72. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married Single
  • 73. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5 2
  • 74. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5 2 Phi- Coefficient -.507
  • 75. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are GENDER associated with “higher” coded values on Male the other Female variable. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5 2 Phi- Coefficient -.507 So, the interpretation would be, that there is a strong relationship between marital status and gender with being male making it more likely that you are single and being female making it more likely you are married.
  • 76. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are GENDER associated with “higher” coded values on Male the other Female variable. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5 2 Phi- Coefficient -.507 So, the interpretation would be, that there is a strong relationship between marital status and gender with being male making it more likely that you are single and being female making it more likely you are married.
  • 77. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are GENDER associated with “higher” coded values on Male the other Female variable. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5 2 Phi- Coefficient -.507 So, the interpretation would be, that there is a strong relationship between marital status and gender with being male making it more likely that you are single and being female making it more likely you are married.
  • 78. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are GENDER associated with “higher” coded values on Male the other Female variable. MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5 2 Phi- Coefficient -.507 So, the interpretation would be, that there is a strong relationship between marital status and gender with being male making it more likely that you are single and being female making it more likely you are married.
  • 79. A negative Phi coefficient would indicate that most of the data are in the off-diagonal cells. A positive phi-coefficient would indicate a systematic pattern in which “higher” coded values on one variable are associated with “higher” coded values on tGhENeD oERther variable. Note: the sign (+ or -) is irrelevant. The main thing to consider is the strength of the relationship between the two variables and then look at the 2x2 matrix to determine what it means. Male Female MARITAL STATUS Married 1 4 Single 5 2 Phi- Coefficient -.507
  • 80. Phi Coefficient Example • A researcher wishes to determine if a significant relationship exists between the gender of the worker and if they experience pain while performing an electronics assembly task. • One question asks “Do you experience pain while performing the assembly task? Yes No” • The second question asks “What is your gender? ___ Male ___ Female”
  • 81. • A researcher wishes to determine if a significant relationship exists between the gender of the worker and if they experience pain while performing an electronics assembly task. e question asks “Do you experience pain while performing the assembly task? Yes No” • The second question asks “What is your gender? ___ Male ___ Female”
  • 82. • A researcher wishes to determine if a significant relationship exists between the gender of the worker and if they experience pain while performing an electronics assembly task. e question asks “Do you experience pain while performing the assembly task? Yes No” • The second question asks “What is your gender? ___ Male ___ Female”
  • 83. Two survey questions are asked of the workers: • One question asks “Do you experience pain while performing the assembly task? Yes No” • The second question asks “What is your gender? ___ Male ___ Female”
  • 84. Two survey questions are asked of the workers: • “Do you experience pain while performing the assembly task? Yes No” • The second question asks “What is your gender? ___ Male ___ Female”
  • 85. Two survey questions are asked of the workers: • “Do you experience pain while performing the assembly task? Yes No” • “What is your gender? ___ Female ___ Male” adsfj;lakjdfs;lakjsdf;lakdsjfa
  • 86. Step 1: Null and Alternative Hypotheses • Ho: There is no relationship between the gender of the worker and if they feel pain while performing the task. • H1: There is a significant relationship between the gender of the worker and if they feel pain while performing the task.
  • 87. Step 1: Null and Alternative Hypotheses • Ho: There is no relationship between the gender of the worker and if they feel pain while performing the task. • H1: There is a significant relationship between the gender of the worker and if they feel pain while performing the task.
  • 88. Step 1: Null and Alternative Hypotheses • Ho: There is no relationship between the gender of the worker and if they feel pain while performing the task. • H1: There is a significant relationship between the gender of the worker and if they feel pain while performing the task.
  • 89. Step 2: Determine dependent and independent variables and their formats.
  • 90. Step 2: Determine dependent and independent variables and their formats.
  • 91. Step 2: Determine dependent and independent variables and their formats. • Gender is the independent variable • Feeling pain is dichotomous, dependent
  • 92. Step 2: Determine dependent and independent variables and their formats. • Gender is the independent variable • Feeling pain is dichotomous, dependent An independent variable is the variable doing the causing or influencing
  • 93. Step 2: Determine dependent and independent variables and their formats. • Gender is the independent variable • Feeling pain is the dependent variable
  • 94. Step 2: Determine dependent and independent variables and their formats. • Gender is the independent variable • Feeling pain is the dependent variable
  • 95. Step 2: Determine dependent and independent variables and their formats. • Gender is the independent variable • Feeling pain is the dependent variable A dependent variable is the thing being caused or influenced by the independent variable
  • 96. Step 2: Determine dependent and independent variables and their formats. • Gender is the independent variable • Feeling pain is the dependent variable
  • 97. Step 2: Determine dependent and independent variables and their formats. • Gender is the independent variable • Feeling pain is the dependent variable • Gender is a dichotomous variable
  • 98. Step 2: Determine dependent and independent variables and their formats. • Gender is the independent variable • Feeling pain is the dependent variable • Gender is a dichotomous variable In this study it can only take on two variables: 1 = Male 2 = Female
  • 99. Step 2: Determine dependent and independent variables and their formats. • Gender is the independent variable • Feeling pain is the dependent variable • Gender is a dichotomous variable • Feeling pain is a dichotomous variable
  • 100. Step 2: Determine dependent and independent variables and their formats. • Gender is the independent variable • Feeling pain is the dependent variable • Gender is a dichotomous variable • Feeling pain is a dichotomous variable In this study it can only take on two variables: 1 = Feel Pain 2 = Don’t Feel Pain
  • 101. Step 3: Choose test statistic
  • 102. Step 3: Choose test statistic • Because we are investigating the relationship between two dichotomous variables, the appropriate test statistic is the Phi Coefficient
  • 103. Step 4: Run the Test – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8)
  • 104. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8)
  • 105. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8)
  • 106. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8)
  • 107. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8)
  • 108. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8)
  • 109. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8) Males Females Total Yes 4 B E No C D F Total G H
  • 110. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8) Males Females Total Yes 4 6 E No C D F Total G H
  • 111. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8) Males Females Total Yes 4 6 E No 11 D F Total G H
  • 112. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8) Males Females Total Yes 4 6 E No 11 8 F Total G H
  • 113. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8) Males Females Total Yes 4 6 E No 11 8 F Total G H
  • 114. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8) Males Females Total Yes 4 6 E No 11 8 F Total 15 H
  • 115. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8) Males Females Total Yes 4 6 E No 11 8 F Total 14 H
  • 116. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8) Males Females Total Yes 4 6 E No 11 8 F Total 14 14
  • 117. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8) Males Females Total Yes 1 12 E No 13 2 F Total 14 14
  • 118. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8) Males Females Total Yes 1 12 13 No 13 2 F Total 14 14
  • 119. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8) Males Females Total Yes 1 12 13 No 13 2 F Total 12 14
  • 120. Step 4: Run the Test • The Phi Coefficient should be set up as follows: – Box A contains the number of Males that said Yes to the pain item (4) – Box B contains the number of Females that said Yes to the pain item (6) – Box C contains the number of Males that said No to the pain item (11) – Box D contains the number of Females that said No to the pain item (8) Males Females Total Yes 1 12 13 No 13 2 15 Total 12 14
  • 122. Phi Coefficient Test Formula bc ad (  ) efgh ( )  
  • 123. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗2) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = .788
  • 124. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = ퟏퟐ∗13 −(1∗2) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = .788
  • 125. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗ퟏퟑ −(1∗2) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = .788
  • 126. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(ퟏ∗2) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = .788
  • 127. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗ퟐ) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = .788
  • 128. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (풆푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗2) ퟏퟓ∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = .788
  • 129. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒풇푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗2) 15∗ퟏퟑ∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = .788
  • 130. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗2) 15∗13∗ퟏퟒ∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = .788
  • 131. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 No c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗2) 15∗13∗14∗ퟏퟒ = 154.0 195.5 = .788
  • 132. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes a = 1 b = 12 e = 15 No c = 13 d = 2 f = 13 Total g = 14 h =14 Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗2) 15∗13∗14∗14 = ퟏퟓퟒ.ퟎ ퟏퟗퟓ.ퟓ = .788
  • 133. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes - Pain a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 No - Pain c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗2) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = -.788
  • 134. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes - Pain a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 No - Pain c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 Result: there is a strong relationship between gender and feeling pain with Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗2) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = -.788 females feeling more pain than males.
  • 135. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes - Pain a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 No - Pain c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗2) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = -.788 Remember that with the Phi-coefficient the sign (-/+) is irrelevant
  • 136. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes - Pain a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 No - Pain c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗2) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = -.788 with a different sign.
  • 137. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes - Pain a = 1 b = 12 e = 13 No - Pain c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗2) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = -.788 with a different sign.
  • 138. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes - Pain a = 12 b = 1 e = 13 No - Pain c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗2) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = -.788 with a different sign.
  • 139. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes - Pain a = 12 b = 1 e = 13 No - Pain c = 13 d = 2 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗2) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = -.788 with a different sign.
  • 140. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes - Pain a = 12 b = 1 e = 13 No - Pain c = 2 d = 13 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = 12∗13 −(1∗2) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = -.788 with a different sign.
  • 141. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes - Pain a = 12 b = 1 e = 13 No - Pain c = 2 d = 13 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = ퟏퟐ∗ퟏퟑ −(ퟏ∗ퟐ) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = -.788 with a different sign.
  • 142. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes - Pain a = 12 b = 1 e = 13 No - Pain c = 2 d = 13 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = ퟏ∗ퟐ −(ퟏퟐ∗ퟏퟑ) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = -.788 with a different sign.
  • 143. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes - Pain a = 12 b = 1 e = 13 No - Pain c = 2 d = 13 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 We could have switched the columns and have gotten the same value but Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = ퟏ∗ퟐ −(ퟏퟐ∗ퟏퟑ) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = +.788 with a different sign.
  • 144. Phi Coefficient Test Formula Males Females Total Yes - Pain a = 12 b = 1 e = 13 No - Pain c = 2 d = 13 f = 15 Total g = 14 h =14 Φ = (푏푐 −푎푑) (푒푓푔ℎ) = ퟏ∗ퟐ −(ퟏퟐ∗ퟏퟑ) 15∗13∗14∗14 = 154.0 195.5 = +.788 The Result is the Same: there is a strong relationship between gender and feeling pain with females feeling more pain than males.
  • 146. Step 5: Conclusions There is a strong relationship between gender and pain • Both males and females have pain (or no pain) at equal frequencies.
  • 147. Step 5: Conclusions There is a strong relationship between gender and pain with more females reporting pain than males. • Both males and females have pain (or no pain) at equal frequencies.
  • 148. Step 5: Conclusions There is a strong relationship between gender and pain with more females reporting pain than males. • Both males and females have pain (or no pain) at equal frequencies. Males Females Yes - Pain 1 12 No - Pain 13 2
  • 149. Step 5: Conclusions There is a strong relationship between gender and pain with more females reporting pain than males. • Both males and females have pain (or no pain) at equal frequencies. Males Females Yes - Pain 1 12 No - Pain 13 2
  • 150. Step 5: Conclusions There is a strong relationship between gender and pain with more females reporting pain than males. • Both males and females have pain (or no pain) at equal frequencies. Males Females Yes - Pain 1 12 No - Pain 13 2