The Intersection between Professor Expectations and Student Interpretations ...Melanie Parlette-Stewart
Presented at the 2016 Teaching and Learning Innovations (TLI) Conference at the University of Guelph on April 26, 2016
As academic support staff, we provide front-line support to students and witness, first-hand, the challenges in student skill development.
We have recognized that the skills students require for higher education not only cross disciplinary boundaries but also are applicable to their writing, learning and research. Through a collaborative, cross-unit research project funded by the University of Guelph's Scholarship of Teaching and Learning research grant, we have identified, in the teaching of and learning in third year university courses, a series of disconnects
a) between the learning, writing and information literacy skills professors expect students to possess and the skills students think they possess when they enter the course;
b) between professor expectations of student skill requirements and student interpretation of skill requirements from the course outline; and
c) between professor and student understandings of where students should develop these skills (i.e. in class or outside of class).
By conducting and disseminating research on the gap between professor communication of expectations and student interpretation of those expectations, we can contribute to graduate attribute research that thoroughly explores student skill development.
This gap has implications on assessment when students are evaluated on skill sets that are not explicitly stated on the course syllabi due to variations in syllabi design or a lack of understanding of where those skills should be taught (i.e. in class or outside of class time). Also, by conducting collaborative research across different units, we believe we can identify gaps in the service delivery of academic support staff, and can recommend and establish more opportunities for academic support staff to communicate with faculty regarding skill support, thereby encouraging collaborations across units that support teaching and learning.
Throughout this showcase, we will present a brief introduction to our research project and offer initial interpretations of our data. We will also demonstrate the implications of our research for those who support faculty in communicating and teaching required skill sets. After a brief presentation of the research project, participants will be invited to comment on or ask questions about our initial findings and proposed recommendations.
The Intersection between Professor Expectations and Student Interpretations o...Melanie Parlette-Stewart
Numerous studies exist on how and to what extent course instructors in higher education are embedding or directly teaching writing, learning and research skills in their courses (Cilliers, 2011; Crosthwaite et al., 2006; and Mager and Sproken-Smith, 2014). Yet, disparity within the literature demonstrates that there is no consistent approach to the scaffolded development of these necessary skills within courses, programs, disciplines, or across disciplines. Preliminary research has also revealed that professor communication of expected or required student skills is often limited or unclear (McGuinnes, 2006).
Through a collaborative research project at the University of Guelph, we employed a multidisciplinary and multi-skill approach to explore the intersection between professor articulation and student interpretation of academic skills. Through this research, we have identified that, in the teaching and learning in third year university courses, discrepancies exist
a. between the learning, writing and research skills professors expect students to possess and the skills students think they possess when they enter the course;
b. in professor articulation of skills they will teach in their course and which skills they expect students to develop outside of class time;
c. in the skills students seek to develop based on their interpretation of the course outline; and
d. in students’ ability to identify necessary skills before and after taking these courses.
Based on these findings, we recommend that a curriculum-based approach to understanding the skill development needs of students can assist in bridging the gap between professor expectations and student interpretations of skill requirements.
Throughout this research presentation, we will present an overview of our research project; present our key findings; offer initial interpretations on student understandings of course outlines; demonstrate the value of cross-unit and cross-departmental collaborations; and offer recommendations and potential areas for further research. After our presentation, we will welcome dialogue and questions.
The Intersection between Professor Expectations and Student Interpretations ...Melanie Parlette-Stewart
Presented at the 2016 Teaching and Learning Innovations (TLI) Conference at the University of Guelph on April 26, 2016
As academic support staff, we provide front-line support to students and witness, first-hand, the challenges in student skill development.
We have recognized that the skills students require for higher education not only cross disciplinary boundaries but also are applicable to their writing, learning and research. Through a collaborative, cross-unit research project funded by the University of Guelph's Scholarship of Teaching and Learning research grant, we have identified, in the teaching of and learning in third year university courses, a series of disconnects
a) between the learning, writing and information literacy skills professors expect students to possess and the skills students think they possess when they enter the course;
b) between professor expectations of student skill requirements and student interpretation of skill requirements from the course outline; and
c) between professor and student understandings of where students should develop these skills (i.e. in class or outside of class).
By conducting and disseminating research on the gap between professor communication of expectations and student interpretation of those expectations, we can contribute to graduate attribute research that thoroughly explores student skill development.
This gap has implications on assessment when students are evaluated on skill sets that are not explicitly stated on the course syllabi due to variations in syllabi design or a lack of understanding of where those skills should be taught (i.e. in class or outside of class time). Also, by conducting collaborative research across different units, we believe we can identify gaps in the service delivery of academic support staff, and can recommend and establish more opportunities for academic support staff to communicate with faculty regarding skill support, thereby encouraging collaborations across units that support teaching and learning.
Throughout this showcase, we will present a brief introduction to our research project and offer initial interpretations of our data. We will also demonstrate the implications of our research for those who support faculty in communicating and teaching required skill sets. After a brief presentation of the research project, participants will be invited to comment on or ask questions about our initial findings and proposed recommendations.
The Intersection between Professor Expectations and Student Interpretations o...Melanie Parlette-Stewart
Numerous studies exist on how and to what extent course instructors in higher education are embedding or directly teaching writing, learning and research skills in their courses (Cilliers, 2011; Crosthwaite et al., 2006; and Mager and Sproken-Smith, 2014). Yet, disparity within the literature demonstrates that there is no consistent approach to the scaffolded development of these necessary skills within courses, programs, disciplines, or across disciplines. Preliminary research has also revealed that professor communication of expected or required student skills is often limited or unclear (McGuinnes, 2006).
Through a collaborative research project at the University of Guelph, we employed a multidisciplinary and multi-skill approach to explore the intersection between professor articulation and student interpretation of academic skills. Through this research, we have identified that, in the teaching and learning in third year university courses, discrepancies exist
a. between the learning, writing and research skills professors expect students to possess and the skills students think they possess when they enter the course;
b. in professor articulation of skills they will teach in their course and which skills they expect students to develop outside of class time;
c. in the skills students seek to develop based on their interpretation of the course outline; and
d. in students’ ability to identify necessary skills before and after taking these courses.
Based on these findings, we recommend that a curriculum-based approach to understanding the skill development needs of students can assist in bridging the gap between professor expectations and student interpretations of skill requirements.
Throughout this research presentation, we will present an overview of our research project; present our key findings; offer initial interpretations on student understandings of course outlines; demonstrate the value of cross-unit and cross-departmental collaborations; and offer recommendations and potential areas for further research. After our presentation, we will welcome dialogue and questions.
Presentation for McLain et al. (2021) at the PATT38 Conference on Tuesday 27th April 2021.
Reference:
McLain, M., McLain, D., Wooff, D. & Irving-Bell, D. (2021). Preservice Teachers’ Perspectives on Modelling and Explaining in STEM Subjects: a Q Methodology Study. Techne: Research in in Sloyd Education and Crafts Science, 28(2), pp.367–374. Available at https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/4292
Online course evaluations: Nonresponse and ClassEval in Fall 2009meredithNCSU
EAC 786 presentation at NC State University.
Adams, M. J. D. (17 November 2010). Online course evaluations: Nonresponse and ClassEval in Fall 2009. Presentation to EAC 786 (Teaching in College) class at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
The project "Development and Implementation of a Program Advancing Research Education and Exploitation for the Support of National Innovation Systems" aims to reinforce the universities’ capability of exploiting their research, while opening their results to industry in order to promote innovation. The exploitation of research is dealt with from two perspectives: how can universities improve the quality and quantity of their research publications to benefit industry? And how can a better knowledge transfer in the domains of research and innovation take place between university and industry?
PARENIS develops a two phased program over three years. The first phase implements five research methodology courses for Master and PhD programs. These courses are focused on enhancing master and PhD students’ capabilities of doing and writing good research. Lecturers from PC universities are involved in the training process to be able to continue to teach the new courses beyond the project lifetime. The subsequent mobility phase enables students to integrate European research teams to learn more about how to put the methodologies into practice.
In the second phase, PARENIS creates mechanisms and procedures to intensify research collaborations between academia and industry. It initiates innovation labs to create a space in which universities and enterprises identify opportunities for joint research and define agendas for collaborative work. Beside the innovation labs, the project launches offices for research exploitation and marketing to ensure a permanent university-enterprise linkage. The EU institutions train the partner universities staff who will be in charge of operating the offices.
Presentation for McLain et al. (2021) at the PATT38 Conference on Tuesday 27th April 2021.
Reference:
McLain, M., McLain, D., Wooff, D. & Irving-Bell, D. (2021). Preservice Teachers’ Perspectives on Modelling and Explaining in STEM Subjects: a Q Methodology Study. Techne: Research in in Sloyd Education and Crafts Science, 28(2), pp.367–374. Available at https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/4292
Online course evaluations: Nonresponse and ClassEval in Fall 2009meredithNCSU
EAC 786 presentation at NC State University.
Adams, M. J. D. (17 November 2010). Online course evaluations: Nonresponse and ClassEval in Fall 2009. Presentation to EAC 786 (Teaching in College) class at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
The project "Development and Implementation of a Program Advancing Research Education and Exploitation for the Support of National Innovation Systems" aims to reinforce the universities’ capability of exploiting their research, while opening their results to industry in order to promote innovation. The exploitation of research is dealt with from two perspectives: how can universities improve the quality and quantity of their research publications to benefit industry? And how can a better knowledge transfer in the domains of research and innovation take place between university and industry?
PARENIS develops a two phased program over three years. The first phase implements five research methodology courses for Master and PhD programs. These courses are focused on enhancing master and PhD students’ capabilities of doing and writing good research. Lecturers from PC universities are involved in the training process to be able to continue to teach the new courses beyond the project lifetime. The subsequent mobility phase enables students to integrate European research teams to learn more about how to put the methodologies into practice.
In the second phase, PARENIS creates mechanisms and procedures to intensify research collaborations between academia and industry. It initiates innovation labs to create a space in which universities and enterprises identify opportunities for joint research and define agendas for collaborative work. Beside the innovation labs, the project launches offices for research exploitation and marketing to ensure a permanent university-enterprise linkage. The EU institutions train the partner universities staff who will be in charge of operating the offices.
Thesis writing services, dissertation writing services, research paper writin...Words Doctorate
Words Doctorate is providing PhD-Master Thesis and Research related support for PhD Students-all stream.
We are providing completed solution for PhD Candidate:-
- Synopsis
- Thesis,
- Research Proposal,
- Research Paper,
- Research Paper Published in Reputed International General
- Software Based Project implementation.
- PhD Presentation.
Working on 7 crucial steps for Thesis-Research:-
1) Introduction:
2) Literature Review:
3) Proposed Solution/Methodology:
4) Solution Validation, Analysis of the Data, Results, and Discussion
5) Conclusions, Recommendations
6) Bibliography/References:
7) Appendices
Why you join with us :-
1. Guaranteed A-Quality Work.
2. Delivery before the Deadline.
3. Work written by PhD Holder.
4. 38-Team of Subject Expert of all Disciplined.
5. Team of Senior Editor to analyses work.
6. Research Lab and Library to study all topics.
7. Plagiarism Detected Software.
8. Data Analyses and Survey Software.
9. Support till Final Approval from University.
10. Dynamic Presentation Support on National-International Conference.
11. 24*7 days Support.
12. Professional Payment Method-Suitable to all students.
Our each work has plagiarism report; we couldn't forward work without plagiarism report.
We have specific lab and team PhD Holder to provide all the services.
Want to know more about Words Doctorate:-
inquiry@wordsdoctorate.com
www.wordsdoctorate.com
Direct Call: +91 8487971533 , 0091 7227977222
A collection of YUMM-TASTIC photos of Idris Elba and also featuring one of his tracks (Best That I Can) as the background music. *I hope that it can be heard*
The first free on-line Journal for Cactus and Succulent Enthusiasts. Number 8. May 2013.
In this edition:
1 Sulcorebutia glomeriseta
2 Echinopsis oxygona
3 Turichipa, Bolivia
4 The Kaibab Plateau
5 Big Bend Ranch Park
Examine experiential learning in a lab based form and then compare it to a lecture based form in a classroom
I hope to prove that lab based hands on learning is more effective than lecture based learning
A common statement made of 1 hour of lecture is equal to 3 hours of lab
I hope to gather data and find what would be the most effective way to educate students in an undergraduate based college program
Edmonds, J., Alzaabi, O. & McGlynn, C. (2015). The Buzz on Tablets in Higher Ed. Presented at the Northeastern Association of Business, Economics and Technology (NABET) Annual Conference in October 2015 in State College, PA.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
1. Learning Style Preferences of Undergraduate Business Majors Academy of Business Research, Fall 2011 Atlantic City, New Jersey Jennifer Edmonds, PhD Dean Frear, PhD Wilkes University