The document traces human evolution from primates to modern humans based on fossil and genetic evidence. Key events include:
- Primates diverged from other mammals around 55 million years ago, with the earliest primate fossil dated to 65 million years ago.
- The earliest hominins, like Sahelanthropus tchadensis from 6-7 million years ago, displayed both ape-like and human-like traits.
- Species like Australopithecus afarensis from 3-2.9 million years ago were the first to walk fully upright.
- Homo habilis and Homo erectus, dating back to 2.3 million and 1.8 million years ago respectively
A brief and concise presentation about the early faces of Man during the early times. A historical presentation about the discoveries and excavations of the early hominids.
A brief and concise presentation about the early faces of Man during the early times. A historical presentation about the discoveries and excavations of the early hominids.
A brief presentation which I prepared for a middle school class. It introduces the importance of being part of history and looks at the medival period of Salerno, Italy.
A brief presentation which I prepared for a middle school class. It introduces the importance of being part of history and looks at the medival period of Salerno, Italy.
Public, interactive talk about the biodiversity of seaweeds in the ocean for the Beaty Biodiversity Museum at the University of British Columbia, Canada. Lots of beautiful underwater pictures.
Muscle physiology in orthodontics/certified fixed orthodontic courses by Ind...Indian dental academy
The Indian Dental Academy is the Leader in continuing dental education , training dentists in all aspects of dentistry and
offering a wide range of dental certified courses in different formats.for more details please visit
www.indiandentalacademy.com
Hindu,Muslim and British In AD 1817,a scottish economist and political philosopher called James mill divided india’s past into three periods–Hindu,muslim and british. mill’s preiodisation was widely accepted at the time. But today,many historians do not agree with his division of the past into hindu or muslim periods on the basis of the religion of rulers. They point out the number of problems with such a classification. firstly,not all ancient a rulers were hindu and not all medival indian rulers were muslim.Many rulers in ancient india belonged to other faiths , such as Buddhism Jainism, etc
Nowdays, many historians classify India past into the ancient, the medival and the modern period.The ancient period said to have ended in the 7th century AD with the death of harshavardhana. The medival period is said to extend from AD 700 to AD 1750.This was the period of regional rulers such as the cholas ,rajputs, the palas, etc. the modern is period is to have begun in the 18th centuary AD.The British also exploited the country resources for their own gain-they collected revenue from the land owners. There polices
Gradually turned india from an exporter of finished goods to an exporter of raw material of british goods. This led to a huge drain of wealth and resources of india . Such subjucation of one country by another that brings about political social ecnomic and cultural changes is called colonisation. Therefore, this period which saw the colonisation of india is also called the colonial periods in indian history.
New political formations After Aurangzeb’s death in AD 1707, mughal power declined and many regional and political forces began to assert their authority over the subcontinent. A number of independent states were carved out of the old mughal provinces in the 18th century AD. Among these the states of Awadh,Bengal and Hyderabad were important. They were founded by mughal nobels the state of hyderabad was founded by Chin Qilich khan , the state of bengal was established by Murshid Quli khan , while awadh became independent under Sa’adat khan another important state at the time was Mysore ,which was never under direct
Mughal control. It had emerged as a powerful state under Hyder Ali and his son Tipu sultan. As Mughal power faded ,other political groups, such as the raj puts, the Marathas , the Sikhs, and the also seized control of various territories . Tipu sultan Aurangzeb
The British intially came to India for trade. They were interested in setting up trading centers for exchanging Indians goods, not conquering territories . They tried to take control of indian markets and setup trading posts they came in conflict with religions powers and other euoropean traders , like the Dutch and Protuguese after that they soon realised the need for occuping territories to established their power by AD 1757 , The British had forcibly taken control on bengal .
THIS PROJECT WAS MADE BY: RAHUL KUMAR BHAGAT
The Living primates is a presentation about the development of primates as the origin of human race. their categories, classifications, what are they alike that has distinctive human characteristics.
My first lecture on the second year Bio263 module on human evolution. An overview of human evolution and palaeoanthropology. Taxonomy and humanity's place in nature. Who is our closest living relative? Evidence from morphology and molecules.
See also Slidecast on YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28bLQIGRbWU
1 Lecture 7 Lecture Summary In this lecture will c.docxjoyjonna282
1
Lecture 7
Lecture Summary
In this lecture will continue the text’s discussion of bipedalism. This lecture will also
provide some further information on the early hominids: Ardipithecus, Australopithecus,
and Homo and their associated biocultural evolution.
Bipedalism
Perhaps the most crucial change in early hominid evolution was the development of
bipedal locomotion – walking on two legs. We know from the fossil record that other
important changes such as the expansion of the brain, modification of the female pelvis to
allow bigger-brained babies to be born, and significant reduction of the face, teeth, and
jaws, did not occur until about 2 million years after the emergence of bipedalism. Be
familiar with the specific anatomical features associated with bipedalism as described in
chapter 6 of your text.
Why did we evolve to become bipedal? There are at least 6 different models that have
been proposed to account for the evolution of bipedalism:
1.) Carrying model – bipedalism could have allowed our ancestors to search for and
collect food in greater safety and with greater efficiency by freeing the arms and
hands. Mothers could carry their children. They could carry sticks and rocks to
throw at predators and scavengers.
2.) Vigilance model – bipedalism, by elevating the head, helped our ancestors locate
potential food sources and dangers. This behavior is seen in other animals,
squirrels and apes, but says more about upright posture than it does of actual
locomotion.
3.) Heat dissipation model – the vertical orientation of the body in bipedalism helps
cool the body by presenting a smaller target to the equatorial sun rays and placing
more of the body above ground to catch cooling air currents. This model applies
to hominids in the hot savannah but not so much in the shady forested areas.
4.) Energy efficiency model – bipedalism is an energy-efficient way of running and
walking compared to quadrapedalism. Long periods of steady bipedal walking in
search of food would seem to require less energy but the first hominids may not
have walked quite like our more recent ancestors-they may have walked in a way
more similar to chimps. So, it has been proposed that bipedalism may have had
other advantages first and then further anatomical changes made it more energy
efficient.
5.) Foraging/bipedal model – this model suggests that standing upright provided the
benefit of reaching in bushes and trees, particular ones that were difficult to
climb.
6.) Display model – bipedalism is thought by some to have emerged as a way to
exhibit an upright display posture like that seen in chimps (and bonobos) during
dominance confrontations. An upright display conveys meaning because it makes
the individual seem larger and is directly related to mating success.
2
All of these models have some supporting evidence and it would not be absurd to assume
that perhaps some or all of them worked together ...
A visual guide to major sites related to Human Evolution worldwide. For each site it indicates the hominid fossils found, species, age, pics of the fossil, the site and other illustrative pics.
More info at http://nutcrakerman.wordpress.com/2014/06/04/human-evolution-notes-from-the-field/
#SciChallenge2017Ava and shauna science projectshauna foran
Our project is based on Human migration and evolution. Our ancestors left Africa 60.000 years ago, and it got us interested in this topic. We wanted to learn to find out about our ancestors; Where our ancestors came from?, what they did?, how they survived? and how we evolved to what we are today?. We had to see why our ancestors moved from Africa to countries across the world and why they settled into the places we live now?. We wanted to know why our ancestors travelled across the world to the places they reside now?. We wanted to know what life was like before we, our parents, our grandparents, even before our great-grandparents were born.
We had a huge interest in this project.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Salas, V. (2024) "John of St. Thomas (Poinsot) on the Science of Sacred Theol...Studia Poinsotiana
I Introduction
II Subalternation and Theology
III Theology and Dogmatic Declarations
IV The Mixed Principles of Theology
V Virtual Revelation: The Unity of Theology
VI Theology as a Natural Science
VII Theology’s Certitude
VIII Conclusion
Notes
Bibliography
All the contents are fully attributable to the author, Doctor Victor Salas. Should you wish to get this text republished, get in touch with the author or the editorial committee of the Studia Poinsotiana. Insofar as possible, we will be happy to broker your contact.
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
ANAMOLOUS SECONDARY GROWTH IN DICOT ROOTS.pptxRASHMI M G
Abnormal or anomalous secondary growth in plants. It defines secondary growth as an increase in plant girth due to vascular cambium or cork cambium. Anomalous secondary growth does not follow the normal pattern of a single vascular cambium producing xylem internally and phloem externally.
ISI 2024: Application Form (Extended), Exam Date (Out), EligibilitySciAstra
The Indian Statistical Institute (ISI) has extended its application deadline for 2024 admissions to April 2. Known for its excellence in statistics and related fields, ISI offers a range of programs from Bachelor's to Junior Research Fellowships. The admission test is scheduled for May 12, 2024. Eligibility varies by program, generally requiring a background in Mathematics and English for undergraduate courses and specific degrees for postgraduate and research positions. Application fees are ₹1500 for male general category applicants and ₹1000 for females. Applications are open to Indian and OCI candidates.
Toxic effects of heavy metals : Lead and Arsenicsanjana502982
Heavy metals are naturally occuring metallic chemical elements that have relatively high density, and are toxic at even low concentrations. All toxic metals are termed as heavy metals irrespective of their atomic mass and density, eg. arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium, thallium, chromium, etc.
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...Travis Hills MN
Travis Hills of Minnesota developed a method to convert waste into high-value dry fertilizer, significantly enriching soil quality. By providing farmers with a valuable resource derived from waste, Travis Hills helps enhance farm profitability while promoting environmental stewardship. Travis Hills' sustainable practices lead to cost savings and increased revenue for farmers by improving resource efficiency and reducing waste.
The use of Nauplii and metanauplii artemia in aquaculture (brine shrimp).pptxMAGOTI ERNEST
Although Artemia has been known to man for centuries, its use as a food for the culture of larval organisms apparently began only in the 1930s, when several investigators found that it made an excellent food for newly hatched fish larvae (Litvinenko et al., 2023). As aquaculture developed in the 1960s and ‘70s, the use of Artemia also became more widespread, due both to its convenience and to its nutritional value for larval organisms (Arenas-Pardo et al., 2024). The fact that Artemia dormant cysts can be stored for long periods in cans, and then used as an off-the-shelf food requiring only 24 h of incubation makes them the most convenient, least labor-intensive, live food available for aquaculture (Sorgeloos & Roubach, 2021). The nutritional value of Artemia, especially for marine organisms, is not constant, but varies both geographically and temporally. During the last decade, however, both the causes of Artemia nutritional variability and methods to improve poorquality Artemia have been identified (Loufi et al., 2024).
Brine shrimp (Artemia spp.) are used in marine aquaculture worldwide. Annually, more than 2,000 metric tons of dry cysts are used for cultivation of fish, crustacean, and shellfish larva. Brine shrimp are important to aquaculture because newly hatched brine shrimp nauplii (larvae) provide a food source for many fish fry (Mozanzadeh et al., 2021). Culture and harvesting of brine shrimp eggs represents another aspect of the aquaculture industry. Nauplii and metanauplii of Artemia, commonly known as brine shrimp, play a crucial role in aquaculture due to their nutritional value and suitability as live feed for many aquatic species, particularly in larval stages (Sorgeloos & Roubach, 2021).
2. OBJECTIVE
Tracing and understanding the
human origin and evolution,with
reference to fossil and genetic
evidences.
3. PRIMATE EVOLUTION
EUARCHONTA
Euarchonta are the grand order of mammals
containing the orders of extinct Pleisiadapiformes,
Scadentia or tree shrews and Primates.
Arose around 88mya. However earliest fossils
recorded is around 65mya (Purgatorious coracis).
Small ,nocturnal, arboreal, insect eating mammals
Includes Primates and Stem primates.
5. STEM PRIMATES- Pleisiadapis
Includes Pleisiadapis from the
order Pleisiadapiformes.
Considered to be the ancestor
of all the primates.
Lived about 55mya.
First to develop finger nails,
and front facing eyes.
Dentition showed functional
shift towards omnivority.
Placed as a sister group to
Primates.
6. PRIMATES
First or most completely developed members of
the animal world. ( J.Z. Young)
Primate = Prime, first rank (Latin)
Characterized by large brains compared to
mammals, increased reliance towards steroscopic
vision at the expense of olfactory senses.
Includes the suborders :
Strepsirrhini
Haplorrhini
8. HAPLORRHINI
Defined by their dry nose
where rhinarium is
replaced by more mobile
and continuous upper lip.
Includes Tarsiers , Simian
monkeys, and Apes.
Further dived into
suborders
Platyrrhini
Catarrhini
9. PLATYRRHINI
Includes new world
monkeys.
Examples: Spider
monkeys, howler
monkeys.
Characteristics includes
Prehensile tail, Flat nose
(with nostrils flaring out),
adaptation for arborel life
with long limbs, delicate
hands and tails for
balancing and seizing.
10. CATARRHINI
Includes Cercopithecoidea
–the old world monkeys.
Larger than new world
monkeys.
Characteristics includes
small tail, naked, highly
coloured rear which
becomes enlarged in
females before ovulation.
Eg: Rhesus monkey
(Macaque), Sacred Baboon
(Papio), Mandrill(
Mandrillus).
11. PROCONSUL
Split from
Cercopithecoidea about
20mya.
Best known african genus
is Proconsul africanus.
Branched off before the
split of greater and lesser
apes.
Had both
Cercopithecoidea and
Ape characterstics.
12. Proconsul africanus
CERCOPITHECOIDEA APE
Thin toothed enamel
Light build and
Narrow chest
Short forelimbs
Arboreal
Quadrupedal
lifestyle.
No tail
Ape like elbows
Larger brain than the
body size
13. HOMINIDAE
Includes greater apes like Pongo (Orangutans), Pan
(Chimpanzee), Gorilla (Gorrila), and lesser apes like
Hylobates (Gibbons)
14. DIVERGENCE OFHUMANS FROM
OTHERAPES
Hylobates (Gibbons)
• First to diverge
• About 15 mya.
Pongo ( Orangutans)
• About 13 mya
Gorrila (Gorrila)
• Speciated from Pan and human lineage.
• About 10 mya
Pan ( chimpanzees)
Speciated from human lineage
About 7 mya
15. EARLIEST HOMININS
Sahenlanthropus tchadensis
Last common ancestor for
human and chimpanzees
Lived about 7-6 mya.
Discovered in 2001, near
Chad,Western Africa.
had both ape like and human
like characteristics.
16. Sahenlanthropus tchadensis
APE HUMAN
Small brain
Sloping face
Very prominent
brow ridges
Elongated skull
Small canine teeth
Short middle part of
the face.
Spinal cord opening
underneath the skull
instead of the back.
17. Orrorin tugenesis
Lived about 6.2 – 5.8 mya.
Discovered in Kenya.
Position of Foramen magnum
suggests bipedalism.
Post cranium suggests they climbed
trees.
Had smaller teeth than the
Australopithecines.
Some consider it as the human
ancestor rather than the
Australopithecines.
If proven then Australopithecines will
be the side branch of the human
family tree.
19. Ardipithecus kadabba
Lived about 5.8-5.2 mya in
eastern Africa.
Discovered in 1997,Kenya.
Bipedal, canine resembled later
hominins
Toe has robust appearance
suggesting bipedal push off.
Diet included fibrous foods.
20. Ardipithecus ramidus
Lived about 4.4 mya in Eastern
Africa.
Discovered in 1994.
Pelvis- both arboreal and bipedal .
Brain was small ( 300-350cc)
Feet – adaptation for grasping
more than walking.
Pelvis, angle of Foramen magnum,
thin wrists suggests Bipedalism.
Diet – omnivorous, non preference
to hard nuts and tubers.
21. AUSTRALOPITHECINES-
Australopithecus afarensis
Lived about 3.8-2.9mya in
eastern Africa.
Discovered in 1974.
Nicknamed ‘Lucy’.
Foot prints of a couple in
volcanic ash ( Lateoli foot
prints) – Bipedalism.
Had both ape and human
characteristics.
22. Australopithecus afarensis
APE HUMAN
Flat nose.
Protruding jaw
Small brain
Curved fingers
Small canine and molars
Bipedal gait
Lower vertebrae modified
to support to bipedalism
even during pregnancy.
23. MISSING LINK??
In 2015, jaw bone had been
found in Ethiopia.
Argued to be earliest Homo
(2.8mya) that links
Austraopithecines to Homo.
Bipedal, enlarged brain,
hands suitable for tool
making.
Not assigned to specific
species yet.
24. EARLY HOMO
Homo habilis
Lived in Eastern Africa about
2.3mya.
Earliest member of the genus
Homo
Larger brain, smaller face,
teeth than Australopithecines
Ape like long arms and
moderately prognathic face.
First to make tools – ‘Handy
man’.
25. Chief predator of
habilis and
Australopithecines –
Dinofelis
Led to the development
of stone making
abilities and living in
group for protection.
26. PARANTHROPUS
Includes P. robustus, P.
aethiopicus, P. boisei
Lived about 2.3- 1.2 mya in
Eastern Africa.
Branched off from H.habilis.
Strong Jaw for eating nuts- thus
named ‘nut cracker man’.
Extinct due to lack of diet
adaptations
Side branch of human lineage-
did not lead to human evolution.
27. Homo erectus (1.8 mya)
Lived in Africa and Asia.
Homo who lived the longest.
Large brain, smaller teeth, less
sloping forehead, elongated
legs and, shorter arms than
torso.
Completely erect gait.
First to migrate outside Africa.
Used fire.
Height 4.9-6feet weight 40-
68kgs.
28. Homo ergaster Homo pekinensis
Lived about 1.5 mya
Evolution of dark skin
happened during its
time indicating that the
loss of body hair is
complete.
Nick named ‘peking
man’.
Lived in Asia.
Considered not to be
the direct ancestors of
humans but cousins that
emerged from H.erectus
29. Homo antecessor
Lived about 1.2 mya
Considered to be the common
ancestor for humans and
Neanderthals.
Cut marks on the skulls and
bones discovered suggests
that they practiced
cannibalism.
30. LATER HOMO
Homo heidelbergensis
Lived about 700k-200k
years ago in eastern and
southern Africa, Europe
and Asia.
Discovered in 1908.
Large brow ridge, larger
braincase, flatter face than
early Homo.
First to hunt large animals,
create simple dwellings
( Terra amata,France).
Larger and more muscular
than modern humans.
31. Homo neanderthalensis (400k-40kya)
Discovered in 1829.
Our closest extinct human
relative.
Shorter , stockier, had large
brain and body.
Used Tools,clothes, painted
on caves,lived in groups,
buried the dead.
Diet was omnivorous.
32. Extinction- causes not known-perhaps lack of
better adaptation or pathogen infection from
migrated H.sapiens might have caused the
extinction.
No violent interactions with H.sapiens found
(infact they coexisted and inter bred).
H.neanderthals disappeared all of a sudden
despite having bigger brain capacity (1400cc)
and burlier body , and the H.sapiens (1300cc
and gracile ) survived.
Perhaps it is the Survival of the weakest in
our case.
33. Homo sapien idaltu (160kya)
Extinct sub species of Homo
sapiens sapiens.
Discovered in 1997, Ethiopia.
Globular braincase and face like
humans,though huge and robust.
Fossils-Non neanderthal.
Shows modern humans evolved in
Africa long before neanderthals in
Europe.
Thus there is no Neanderthal
stage in human evolution.
34. DENISOVANS (30k- 50kya)
Discovered in 2010 in
Denisova cave, Siberia
Cave also had Neanderthal
fossils(dated 45kya) and
human fossils.
Gene sequencing- non
neanderthal
Also some of the DNA in
Australian aborigines is from
them.
Indicates interbreeding b/w
archaic H.sapiens,
H.neanderthals and
denisovans
35. Homo floresiensis (18kya)
Until recently it was thought that we were
the only hominin existed after the
neanderthal extinction about 40kya.
But H.floresiensis was discovered in 2003
from Flores, Indonesia, which is supposed
to have lived along with Homo sapiens
Showed Rapid reduction in body size.
Considered as human hobbit.
But argued that the cranium used to
describe the species could have been
example of Microcephaly.
Still unresolved.
36. Homo sapien sapien(200kya)
Only living Homo.
Originated from eastern africa and spread
to all corners of the world.
Also caleed Cro-magnon man or Omo.
Characterised by
Skull- thin walled & high vaulted to
accommodate large brain.
Distinct chin.
Near vertical fore head.
Much less(if any) eyebrow ridges.
Much less prognathism.
Jaws with small teeth.
Lighter build.
Large brain capacity-1300cc.
38. MULTI -REGIONALORIGIN
Proposed by Milford Wolpoff in 1984.
Modern humans arose about 2mya and
subsequent human evolution has been
within a single species.
This species encompasses all archaic
humans such as the H.erectus,
H.neanderthal as well as the modern forms
and evolved world wide to diverse
population of Homo sapien sapiens.
Genes exchanged between continental
populations via cross migration enabling
various groups to reach the same Homo
sapien sapien status.
Major blow- Mitochondrial eve , Y
chromosomal adam, anatomically modern
human fossils( idaltu).
39. THE RECENTAFRICAN ORIGIN
(OUT OFAFRICA)
Homo sapiens evolved from Homo erectus
only in Africa.
Migrated from Africa about 100kya.
Widely accepted.
Genetic evidence(mt eve, Y chromosomal
adam) and fossil evidence(idatu) suggests
anatomically modern humans evolved
solely in Africa b/w 200k-60kya.
H.sapiens left africa and replaced other
homos such as H.neanderthal and H.
erectus.
Also archaic humans may have interbred
with other homo to give rise to modern
humans
40.
41. MITOCHONDRIALEVE
(140k-200kya)
Alan Wilson et al proposed it in
1979. Published on ‘nature’ in 1987.
Matrilineal most recent common
ancestor(MRCA) of all the
currently living humans.
We descend in an unbroken line , on
our mother’s side & mothers of our
mothers and so on untill all lines
converge on one woman.
mtDNA is passed from mother
without recombination.
Lived after H.heidelbergiensis and
after the emergence of H.
neanderthal in Africa.
Boost to ‘out of Africa’ hypothesis.
42. Y-CHROMOSOMAL ADAM
Patrilineal most recent
common ancestor.
Male who was the last one
from whom all males
inherit their Y
chromosome.
A phylogenetic analysis of
more than 1500 individuals
from all continents traced
the Y chromosome to a
common African ancestor.
Confirms ‘out of Africa’
hypothesis.
43. EVOLUTION OF RACES
All contemporary humans are members of the same
polytypic specie, Homo sapien sapiens.
People are clumped together in a particular race by
characteristics such as the skin colour, face shape,hair
colour and form, skin around the eyes, eye colour etc.
CAUSES: Global cooling trend, about 1,30,000 years
ago caused average drop in temperature.
Homo sapiens moved to different regions and were
isolated long enough and inherited some traits.
Darkness of the skin decreased with increasing
latitude.
Major races of today are
Caucasians,Blacks,Mongoloids, and Australoids
44.
45. CAUCASIANS : White skinned people
majorly seen in europe. They have
orthognathic face with vertically straight fore
head.Have 4% Neanderthal genes.
BLACKS: Negroes include the native African
and Afro-americans. They have prognathic
face, bigger teeth, lips, concave forehead).
46. MONGOLOIDS: Yellow skinned people of the
Asian continent with characteristic facial features
( flat face, epicanthic folds)
AUSTRALOIDS: Includes the native Australians
( Australian aborigines) and the Dravidians(
Tamils) of south India.
It is believed that the Australoids and negroes
have the most primitive features( proganthic face,
concave forehead).
47. RECENT EVOLUTION OF MAN
It’s a most common misconception that the humans
had stopped evolving.
But The Natural selection still affects the humans.
Current evolution seen in man are
Delay of the menopause and early puberty in females
resulting in the lengthening of the reproductive
period.
Reduction in blood glucose levels, cholesterol levels
and blood pressure in some populations.(Human diet
is high in fats and calories, there is currently a
selective pressure going on to make the humans more
adapted to these diets and thus more resistant to
diseases.)
48. Lactase persistence ( lactose intolerance has been
greatly reduced).
Loss of wisdom tooth owing to the smaller jaw(
about 35% of the population today does not
develop wisdom tooth, as evolution tends to
favour the elimination of the unwanted traits to
save the unnecessary energy expenditure it takes
to develop it).
Blending of races- due to globalization there are
very few populations that remains isolated. Thus
the racial differences are gradually disappearing.
Decrease in robust muscular strength ( studies
show we’re weaker than our ancestors).
49. Loss of Palmaris longus in 10% of the world
population.
50. CONCLUSION
Homo sapiens are the apex beings of our
world today.
But on seeing the grand scheme, we’re the
youngest beings on earth.
Our existence of about 200k years is nothing
compared to the other organisms or even our
hominin ancestors who lived longer than us.
Adaptation, natural selection,and genetical
evolution shaped our species to what we’re
today and is still shaping us toward our future.
51. REFERENCES FOR FURTHER READING
BIBLIOGRAPHY
•Concepts of biology – Sylvia S.Mader
•Evolution- Nicholas H.Barton et al
•Evolution(4th edition ) – Strickberger
•Evolutionary Analysis(4th edition)- Scott freeman & Jon C.Herron
•Human and primate evolution- Susan cachel
•Human evolution- Birdsell
•Human genetics- Russ Hodge
•Humankind emerging (9th edition) - Bernard G.Campbell et al
•Introduction to physical Anthropology(2009-2010 edition)- Robert Jurmain et al
•Neanderthals and modern humans-Clive Finlayson
•Primates of the world- Rod & Ken preston
•Principles of organic evolution-E.k .Iyer
•Smithsonian intimate guide to human origin- Carl Zimmer
•The Descent of man- Charles Darwin
•The life of Vertebrates- J.Z.Young
•The Rise of Homo sapiens- Fredrick L. Coolidge & Thomas wynn
•What on the Earth evolved – Christopher llyod
52. Websites and e-journals
•Bradshawfoundation.com
•Forbes.com – missing link fossil found (2015)
•Humanorigins.si.edu
•Leakeyfoundation.org
•Mhrc.net – Mitochondrial Eve
•Mnn.com – Projecting Human Evolution( 2012)
•Modern humans came out of Africa-Owen James,
National geographic news(2007)
•Nature.com
•Sciencemag.org – molecular genomic data identify the
closest living relative of primates , Jan E. Janeka et al
•Scientificamerican.com
•Usnews.com (2012)
Editor's Notes
Pelvis, angle of f. magnum,, thin wrists- bipedalism
1/ 5th the size of human brain Non prefernce to hard nuts and tubers- dentition