The document discusses the changing nature of scholarly communication and how researchers are publishing and disseminating their work. It notes that factors like increased research funding, technological advances, and policy changes are influencing researcher behaviors and practices. Researchers are now using more electronic and open access publishing as well as social media and web 2.0 tools to disseminate their work. The document recommends that libraries support these changes by maintaining access to electronic content, providing training and guidance on communication channels and tools, and helping set standards for curation and preservation of scholarly outputs.
2.24.16 Slides, “VIVO plus SHARE: Closing the Loop on Tracking Scholarly Acti...DuraSpace
Hot Topics: The DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
Series 13: “VIVO plus SHARE: Closing the Loop on Scholarly Activity”
Webinar 1: , “VIVO plus SHARE: Closing the Loop on Tracking Scholarly Activity” 2.24.16
Curated by Rick Johnson, Program Co-Director, Digital Initiatives and Scholarship Head, Data Curation and Digital Library Solutions Hesburgh Libraries, University of Notre Dame; Visiting Program Officer for SHARE at the Association of Research Libraries. Presented by Rick Johnson & Mike Conlon, VIVO Project Director, DuraSpace
3.11.16 Slides, “Institutional Perspectives on the Impact of SHARE and VIVO T...DuraSpace
Hot Topics: The DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
Series 14: “VIVO plus SHARE: Closing the Loop on Scholarly Activity”
Webinar 2: “Institutional Perspectives on the Impact of SHARE and VIVO Together” 3.11.16
Curated by Rick Johnson, Program Co-Director, Digital Initiatives and Scholarship Head, Data Curation and Digital Library Solutions Hesburgh Libraries, University of Notre Dame; Visiting Program Officer for SHARE at the Association of Research Libraries. Presented by Andi Ogier, Associate Director, Data Services, University Libraries, Virginia Tech
How to Get Started Tracking Scholarly Activity with VIVO and SHAREDuraSpace
Hot Topics: The DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
Series 14: “VIVO plus SHARE: Closing the Loop on Scholarly Activity”
Webinar 3: “How to Get Started Tracking Scholarly Activity with VIVO and SHARE” 3.21.16
Curated by Rick Johnson, Program Co-Director, Digital Initiatives and Scholarship Head, Data Curation and Digital Library Solutions Hesburgh Libraries, University of Notre Dame; Visiting Program Officer for SHARE at the Association of Research Libraries. Presented by Erin Braswell, Infrastructure Developer, SHARE - Center for Open Science
5-14-13 An Introduction to VIVO Presentation SlidesDuraSpace
“Hot Topics: The DuraSpace Community Webinar Series, "Series Five: VIVO: Research Discovery and Networking.” Webinar #1: An Introduction to VIVO, May 14, 2013
Presented by: Dean Krafft, Chief Technology Strategist at Cornell University Library and Chair of the VIVO-DuraSpace Management Committee, Brian Lowe, Semantic Applications Programmer, Cornell and Jon Corson-Rikert, VIVO Development Lead, Cornell
2.24.16 Slides, “VIVO plus SHARE: Closing the Loop on Tracking Scholarly Acti...DuraSpace
Hot Topics: The DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
Series 13: “VIVO plus SHARE: Closing the Loop on Scholarly Activity”
Webinar 1: , “VIVO plus SHARE: Closing the Loop on Tracking Scholarly Activity” 2.24.16
Curated by Rick Johnson, Program Co-Director, Digital Initiatives and Scholarship Head, Data Curation and Digital Library Solutions Hesburgh Libraries, University of Notre Dame; Visiting Program Officer for SHARE at the Association of Research Libraries. Presented by Rick Johnson & Mike Conlon, VIVO Project Director, DuraSpace
3.11.16 Slides, “Institutional Perspectives on the Impact of SHARE and VIVO T...DuraSpace
Hot Topics: The DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
Series 14: “VIVO plus SHARE: Closing the Loop on Scholarly Activity”
Webinar 2: “Institutional Perspectives on the Impact of SHARE and VIVO Together” 3.11.16
Curated by Rick Johnson, Program Co-Director, Digital Initiatives and Scholarship Head, Data Curation and Digital Library Solutions Hesburgh Libraries, University of Notre Dame; Visiting Program Officer for SHARE at the Association of Research Libraries. Presented by Andi Ogier, Associate Director, Data Services, University Libraries, Virginia Tech
How to Get Started Tracking Scholarly Activity with VIVO and SHAREDuraSpace
Hot Topics: The DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
Series 14: “VIVO plus SHARE: Closing the Loop on Scholarly Activity”
Webinar 3: “How to Get Started Tracking Scholarly Activity with VIVO and SHARE” 3.21.16
Curated by Rick Johnson, Program Co-Director, Digital Initiatives and Scholarship Head, Data Curation and Digital Library Solutions Hesburgh Libraries, University of Notre Dame; Visiting Program Officer for SHARE at the Association of Research Libraries. Presented by Erin Braswell, Infrastructure Developer, SHARE - Center for Open Science
5-14-13 An Introduction to VIVO Presentation SlidesDuraSpace
“Hot Topics: The DuraSpace Community Webinar Series, "Series Five: VIVO: Research Discovery and Networking.” Webinar #1: An Introduction to VIVO, May 14, 2013
Presented by: Dean Krafft, Chief Technology Strategist at Cornell University Library and Chair of the VIVO-DuraSpace Management Committee, Brian Lowe, Semantic Applications Programmer, Cornell and Jon Corson-Rikert, VIVO Development Lead, Cornell
Presentation to the ESRC Scottish Graduate School of Social Science on the evaluation of the digital impact of research. There is a video associated with these slides available at https://vimeo.com/149665866
Gorman ODNI Academic Excellence Biosecurity Commons August 2, 2010bgorman
6th Annual ODNI Intelligence Community Centers of Academic Excellence Summer Seminar
August 2, 2010 Gaylord National Harbor Hotel and Conference Center, National Harbor, MD
Presentation and discussion session for a group of agricultural consultants and researchers at Scotland’s Rural College, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, 27 August 2015.
Presented at the Open Science Fair, Athens 6-8 September 2017, at the FOSTER Plus "Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond" workshop http://www.opensciencefair.eu/training/parallel-day-2-2/fostering-the-practical-implementation-of-open-science-in-horizon-2020-and-beyond
Open Science, Why not?
Presented at the Agreenskills meeting
Paris, 15 February 2017
Abstract: Imagine YOUR research some time in the future! Abandon all preconceptions, and imagine an idealised way of how research might be done in the future. What does it look like? Is the knowledge you’ll create in the future constrained to your pencil scribbled notebook, to your lab, and to the pages of an elite journal? Or does it flow seamlessly across disciplines and collaborative teams. Is the knowledge you generate in the future categorised, labelled and published according to rigid disciplinary taxonomy, or is it being applied by people you never met and may never meet. Is the fruit of your labour so discoverable, accessible and re-usable that it advances knowledge, fixes real world problems in research directions that you never thought of possible anticipated? And imagine all that happens even while you are sleeping, but attributing full credit to you? That future may become the default setting sooner than you might guess.
The presentation will briefly introduce Open Science in the context of an open, transparent, re-usable and reproducible research lifecycle, and present strategic and career arguments, such as why research of relevance to societal challenges can not afford not to adopt Open Science as the default setting.
Using social media to promote your researchHazel Hall
Slides from a workshop for academics, researchers, and PhD students (1) to address the need to enhance the visibility of their work, (2) to raise awareness of opportunities for developing professional networks offered by social media (e.g. to connect to peers and collaborators, and engage with the work of others as they engage with theirs); (3) to discuss strategies for the development of presences on, and use of, social media.
Role of Library in promoting Research and Scholarly Communication in Digital ...sabitrimajhi
This presentation explains different web tools/ platforms and their implication in Research and Scholarly Communication Cycle. The steps of scholarly communication cycle is like below.
1.Literature Search to find existing Research
2. Evaluation of Literature sources to select quality research literature
3. Managing/Organising documents using citation Management tools.
4. Selection of Appropriate Sources to publish the Research work.
5. Managing Research Profiles of researcher and promoting the use of altmetrics
6. Showcasing and maximizing discovery of institutional research output by self archiving.
Scholarly social media applications platforms for knowledge sharing and net...tullemich
This short presentation deals with some of the current publishing workflows to platforms for scholarly knowledge sharing and SoMe networking. It is touched upon what kind of implications emerge from operating in these open and networked virtual research environments (VRE) e.g. publishing open access.
Creating a UK-wide network of LIS researchersHazel Hall
Presentation delivered at the Library Research Symposium. McMaster University, Canada, 3 November 2015.
The aim of the Arts and Humanities Research Council funded Developing Research Excellence and Methods project, was to develop a formal UK-wide network of Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers (academic and practitioner). The project ran from January 2011 to August 2012, and was supported by the UK Library and Information Science Research Coalition.
The initial successes of the DREaM project were reported in a paper that Hazel Hall co-authored with Alison Brettle and Charles Oppenheim and presented at QQML 2012. Three years later in summer 2015, Hall and her colleague Bruce Ryan conducted further research to explore any lasting impacts of the project.
Those who attended three DREaM research methods workshops in 2011/12 were invited to complete a survey in June 2015. The survey questions focused on LIS work undertaken since the last DREaM workshop in April 2012. Respondents were asked to report on the use of the methods presented at the DREaM workshops; any new DREaM-inspired LIS research and publications, and their impacts; the influence of DREaM on individual career paths; and any on-going contact between those who developed relationships with one another over the course of the three workshops. Further data for the 2015 project – known as DREaM Again - were collected formally from focus groups and more informally through email contact with DREaM workshop participants.
In this presentation the main findings of DREaM Again are discussed.
Would you like to be my friend: Patron responsiveness to academic library Fac...parfitt123
A Masters student presentation - presented by Suzanne Parfitt (Master of Information Studies student at Charles Sturt University, Australia) at the MMIT 2015 Conference, Sheffield University, UK in September 2015
Presentation at EMTACL10, http://www.ntnu.no/ub/emtacl/
Guus van den Brekel
Central medical library, UMCG
Virtual Research Networks: towards Research 2.0
In the next few years, the further development of social, educational and research networks – with its extensive collaborative possibilities – will be dictating how users will search for, manage and exchange information. The network – evolved by technology – is changing the user's behaviour and that will affect the future of information services. Many envision a possible leading role for libraries in collaboration and community building services.
Users are not only heavily using new tools, but are also creating and shaping their own preferred tools.
Today's students are incorporating Web 2.0 skills in daily life, in their social and learning environments.
Tomorrow's research staff will expect to be able to use their preferred tools and resources within their work environment.
Today's ánd tomorrow's libraries should support students and staff in the learning and research process by integrating library services and resources into their environments.
Presentation to the ESRC Scottish Graduate School of Social Science on the evaluation of the digital impact of research. There is a video associated with these slides available at https://vimeo.com/149665866
Gorman ODNI Academic Excellence Biosecurity Commons August 2, 2010bgorman
6th Annual ODNI Intelligence Community Centers of Academic Excellence Summer Seminar
August 2, 2010 Gaylord National Harbor Hotel and Conference Center, National Harbor, MD
Presentation and discussion session for a group of agricultural consultants and researchers at Scotland’s Rural College, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, 27 August 2015.
Presented at the Open Science Fair, Athens 6-8 September 2017, at the FOSTER Plus "Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond" workshop http://www.opensciencefair.eu/training/parallel-day-2-2/fostering-the-practical-implementation-of-open-science-in-horizon-2020-and-beyond
Open Science, Why not?
Presented at the Agreenskills meeting
Paris, 15 February 2017
Abstract: Imagine YOUR research some time in the future! Abandon all preconceptions, and imagine an idealised way of how research might be done in the future. What does it look like? Is the knowledge you’ll create in the future constrained to your pencil scribbled notebook, to your lab, and to the pages of an elite journal? Or does it flow seamlessly across disciplines and collaborative teams. Is the knowledge you generate in the future categorised, labelled and published according to rigid disciplinary taxonomy, or is it being applied by people you never met and may never meet. Is the fruit of your labour so discoverable, accessible and re-usable that it advances knowledge, fixes real world problems in research directions that you never thought of possible anticipated? And imagine all that happens even while you are sleeping, but attributing full credit to you? That future may become the default setting sooner than you might guess.
The presentation will briefly introduce Open Science in the context of an open, transparent, re-usable and reproducible research lifecycle, and present strategic and career arguments, such as why research of relevance to societal challenges can not afford not to adopt Open Science as the default setting.
Using social media to promote your researchHazel Hall
Slides from a workshop for academics, researchers, and PhD students (1) to address the need to enhance the visibility of their work, (2) to raise awareness of opportunities for developing professional networks offered by social media (e.g. to connect to peers and collaborators, and engage with the work of others as they engage with theirs); (3) to discuss strategies for the development of presences on, and use of, social media.
Role of Library in promoting Research and Scholarly Communication in Digital ...sabitrimajhi
This presentation explains different web tools/ platforms and their implication in Research and Scholarly Communication Cycle. The steps of scholarly communication cycle is like below.
1.Literature Search to find existing Research
2. Evaluation of Literature sources to select quality research literature
3. Managing/Organising documents using citation Management tools.
4. Selection of Appropriate Sources to publish the Research work.
5. Managing Research Profiles of researcher and promoting the use of altmetrics
6. Showcasing and maximizing discovery of institutional research output by self archiving.
Scholarly social media applications platforms for knowledge sharing and net...tullemich
This short presentation deals with some of the current publishing workflows to platforms for scholarly knowledge sharing and SoMe networking. It is touched upon what kind of implications emerge from operating in these open and networked virtual research environments (VRE) e.g. publishing open access.
Creating a UK-wide network of LIS researchersHazel Hall
Presentation delivered at the Library Research Symposium. McMaster University, Canada, 3 November 2015.
The aim of the Arts and Humanities Research Council funded Developing Research Excellence and Methods project, was to develop a formal UK-wide network of Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers (academic and practitioner). The project ran from January 2011 to August 2012, and was supported by the UK Library and Information Science Research Coalition.
The initial successes of the DREaM project were reported in a paper that Hazel Hall co-authored with Alison Brettle and Charles Oppenheim and presented at QQML 2012. Three years later in summer 2015, Hall and her colleague Bruce Ryan conducted further research to explore any lasting impacts of the project.
Those who attended three DREaM research methods workshops in 2011/12 were invited to complete a survey in June 2015. The survey questions focused on LIS work undertaken since the last DREaM workshop in April 2012. Respondents were asked to report on the use of the methods presented at the DREaM workshops; any new DREaM-inspired LIS research and publications, and their impacts; the influence of DREaM on individual career paths; and any on-going contact between those who developed relationships with one another over the course of the three workshops. Further data for the 2015 project – known as DREaM Again - were collected formally from focus groups and more informally through email contact with DREaM workshop participants.
In this presentation the main findings of DREaM Again are discussed.
Would you like to be my friend: Patron responsiveness to academic library Fac...parfitt123
A Masters student presentation - presented by Suzanne Parfitt (Master of Information Studies student at Charles Sturt University, Australia) at the MMIT 2015 Conference, Sheffield University, UK in September 2015
Presentation at EMTACL10, http://www.ntnu.no/ub/emtacl/
Guus van den Brekel
Central medical library, UMCG
Virtual Research Networks: towards Research 2.0
In the next few years, the further development of social, educational and research networks – with its extensive collaborative possibilities – will be dictating how users will search for, manage and exchange information. The network – evolved by technology – is changing the user's behaviour and that will affect the future of information services. Many envision a possible leading role for libraries in collaboration and community building services.
Users are not only heavily using new tools, but are also creating and shaping their own preferred tools.
Today's students are incorporating Web 2.0 skills in daily life, in their social and learning environments.
Tomorrow's research staff will expect to be able to use their preferred tools and resources within their work environment.
Today's ánd tomorrow's libraries should support students and staff in the learning and research process by integrating library services and resources into their environments.
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibility ...Eileen Shepherd
[This presentation is based on my previous presentation, of the same title, at the LIASA 2014 conference. It was presented as a webinar for LIASA Higher Education Libraries Interest Group on 6/11/2014]
Traditional bibliometric methods of evaluating academic research, such as journal impact factors and article citations, have been supplemented in the past 5-10 years by the development of altmetrics (alternative metrics or article level metrics). Altmetrics measures impact of research, data and publications, such as references in data and knowledge bases, article views, downloads and mentions in social media and news media. This presentation gives a brief background to altmetrics and demonstrates how Rhodes University librarians are using social media to raise the visibility of the research output of their institution. (Rhodes University is in Grahamstown, South Africa)
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibility at Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa - HELIG Webinar presented by Eileen Shepherd
WEBINAR: Joining the "buzz": the role of social media in raising research vi...HELIGLIASA
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibility: Traditional bibliometric methods of evaluating academic research, such as journal impact factors and article citations, have been supplemented in the past 5-10 years by the development of altmetrics (alternative metrics/article level metrics). Altmetrics measures aspects of the impact of a work, such as references in data and knowledge bases, article views, downloads and mentions in social media and news media.
This webinar (based on a presentation of the same name at the LIASA conference on 24th September 2014) gives a brief background to altmetrics and demonstrates how Rhodes University, Grahamstown, librarians are using social media to raise the visibility of the research output of their institution.
Presented by Eileen Shepherd, Principal Librarian, Science & Pharmacy, Rhodes University Library
The needs of researchers in key disciplines are changing rapidly and this has important implications for the library’s role in enhancing research productivity and impact.
Librarians can build a roadmap for supporting 21st Century research needs that draws on both published research sources and institution-specific user research. Several key trends from recent studies and ideas for institution-specific user research tools are highlighted within.
The Liber 2009 presentation repeated for a Dutch audience IN Dutch but with the english slides (just the first one is in Dutch :-)
Samenwerking Hogeschool bibliotheken SHB, 5 november 2009
How to Accelerate the Dissemination & Impact of Your Research WorkKatja Reuter, PhD
This presentation is part of the Digital Scholar Training Series at USC and CHLA. Learn more about the initiative: http://sc-ctsi.org/digital-scholar/
News story: http://sc-ctsi.org/index.php/news/new-digital-scholar-training-initiative-helps-researchers-better-utilize-we#.VDhIWWK9mKU
Global digital context
Social Media, a definition
Social Media policies?
Digital identity – the ‘research professional’
Social Media tools for academia?
Social Media – a new data source
Social Media in Research –
what considerations?
Citing Social Media sources
Value of Social Media?
Research-Open Access-Social Media: A winning combinationEileen Shepherd
This presentation endeavours to show that social media and open access are a great couple, to provide a brief introduction to altmetrics – a non-traditional form of measuring scholarly impact and to demonstrate the use of social media in raising awareness and visibility of Rhodes University research
The presentation provides reasons for using social media in research activities and communication. Various social media are linked to the Research Life Cycle.
The original presentation was held at a research group meeting at Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, June 2014.
Similar to The changing nature of scholarly communication - What does this mean for researchers? (20)
Professor Carole Goble, University of Manchester, talks at the RIN "Research data: policies & behaviour" event as part of a series on Research Information in Transition.
Presentation from RIN hosted event on 'The future of scholarly publishing - where do we go from here?'
Part one of a series of events on the theme 'Research information in transition'.
Presentation by Michael Jubb, Director of Research Information Network, given at the Preservation Advisory Centre 'Decoding the Digital' conference at the British Library 27 July 2010.
Presentation by RIN Director Michael Jubb at Dryad repository for datasets workshop linked to published journal articles (http://datadryad.org/repo)
on 27 April 2010, London
Presentation by the RIN's Director, Michael Jubb, at the Spanish Research Council's (CSIC) workshop on the politics of the promotion of open access in Barcelona in March 2010. http://www.csic.es/web/guest/home
Presentation by RIN's Director, Michael Jubb, at the Association of Subscription Agents' annual conference in February 2010. http://www.subscription-agents.org/conferences/asa-conference-2010
Presentation by the RIN's Liaison and Partnership Officer, Branwen Hide, at the British Library/JISC Digital Researchers Day on 15 March 2010 (http://explorationforchange.net/index.php/current-projects/researchers-of-tomorrow/researchers-of-tomorrow-home.html).
Covers different types of news readers/aggregators that might be of use to researchers and how to use them.
Sense About Science held a workshop on peer review in collaboration with the Research Information Network, Vitae, Elsevier and the Voice of Young Science.
This afternoon event was held at the University of Sussex, Brighton on 5 March 2010 and was free and for early career researchers in all sciences, engineering and medicine (PhD students, post-docs or equivalent in first job).
The workshop discussed the process of peer review in journal publishing and explored the criticisms of the peer review process. What does peer review do for science? Does it detect fraud and misconduct? Will it illuminate good ideas or shut them down?
The RIN’s Liason and Partnerships Officer, Branwen Hide, spoke at the event on ‘The changing scholarly communications landscape: What does this mean for peer review?’
For more information on the programme, visit http://www.rin.ac.uk/news/events/research-publishing-it-reviewing-it-and-talking-about-it-publicly
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
The changing nature of scholarly communication - What does this mean for researchers?
1. The changing nature of scholarly communication Dr. Branwen Hide August 3rd, 2010 What does this mean for researchers?
2.
3. Basic research life cycle Research Production Publication Development of research idea Post-publication distribution Pre-publication dissemination Literature reviews, archival material, e-mails, face-face meetings, conferences, networking Bench research, field research, conceptualizing Conferences, meetings, departmental seminars, personal communications, emails Peer reviewed high impact publications (journals or monographs) Conferences, seminars, Personal communications, technical reports, grey literature, popular literature, newspapers, grant applications, networking
9. Web 2.0 tools and resources web based tools and resources which encourage wide scale informal dissemination , sharing , collaboration , and re-purposing of content and innovative ways to interact with and use these web based platforms. Ware, M (2003). Web 2.0 and Scholarly Communication
10.
11. Researchers as generators of knowledge Using web 2.0 tools to producing, commenting on, and share scholarly content Type of Scholarly Communications Activity PhD Student Research Assistant Lecturer RIN (2010), If they buid it will they come. Researchers us of web 2.0 tools and resources
12.
13. 3. Policy developments Funding cuts Research Assessment Public engagement Impact Knowledge Transfer Data management plans Open access publishing Data sharing mandates Library budget constraints Innovation Grand Challenges Internationalization Quality Assurance dissemination
14.
15. Research 2.0 Research Production Development of research idea Publication and distribution Pre-publication dissemination Literature reviews, online data bases, online archival material, online discussions Text mining, virtual lab equipment, online-analysis, reuse of existing data Blogs, wikis, networking sites, on-line forums, databases Peer reviewed outputs (E-journals, e-books, open access publications), subject specific repositories, Blogs, wikis, online-forums, networking sites, slideshare, Flicker, YouTube, institutional repositories, reference sharing sites, subject specific repositories, Society web pages UKPMC, UKDA, Mendeley, Connotea, Times Archives EMBL,H-net.org, Economists online, Researchgate, Friend Feed Ensembl , myExperiment, EBI, UKDA Friendfeed, Researchgate, UKDA academia.edu, arXiv, H-net.org, Mendeley, Conneta, citeUlike, Connotea, Twitter, Omeka, ScholarPress, academia.edu, Friendfeed, open humanities press, Researchgate, EBI, UKDA, UKPMC
16.
17.
18.
19. Dr. Branwen Hide Liaison and Partnership Officer Research Information Network [email_address] www.rin.ac.uk
Editor's Notes
I have been asked to talk about the changing nature of scholarly communications and the implications this has for researchers But I would like approach this in a slightly different manner and look at current researcher practises and talk about the factors that influence researcher behaviour And then examine what the implications are for those within the scholarly communications landscape I hope that when I finish you will understand why I have chosen to approach the topic in this way. As for personal background – I have been working for the RIN for 2 years as the liaison and partnerships officer and prior to the I completed a PhD at Oxford in Biochemistry.
I have just put together a simplified version of a research life cycle to help us identify the basic components of research and to think about how we approach the different steps There is a lot of overlap between the different stages but we tend to still think about and talk about the different stages as discrete steps Might be more accurate in this context to talk about it in simpler terms related to the role of researcher and researchers 1) to generate knowledge 2) to use knowledge Important to bare in mind these 2 different and often conflicting roles when talking about both researcher behaviour and scholarly communications
We know that in general the reasons why researchers publish has not changed very much for the past few years And that the types of out puts they publish has not changed that much either – it is more medium in which they are produced that has changed. What I mean is that researchers still produce journal articles – they are just now more likely to be produced electronically; instead of writing a letter to a journal commenting on a paper you might write a blog – but the principle and the reasoning behind them is the same. But we are all well aware the scholarly communications landscape is changing. So the question is what is instigating these changes?
The perception, and in many cases, the realty that their work is being monitored and assessed has a major influence on how it is communicated And as a result research outputs are becoming increasingly important commodity
As a result starting to see an increase in journal article production in areas that didn’t traditional publish in journals. Such as humanities and education
World wide web User generated content Social media Open research practices Suppercomputing Cloud computing Mobile computing (blackberry and ipad) - Many of these underpin or are a result of web 2.0 technology
Producers of knowledge: dissemination and sharing Users of knowledge: collaborations and re-purposing the definition is not limited to technologies but also includes the changing ways in which individuals and groups produce and communicate information
Over the past few years, there has been a growing increase in the use of the internet within research, and tied to this is the rapid development of new tools and services being launched by commercial players as well as arising from the efforts of research communities, information service providers and knowledge intermediaries such as publishers and conference organizers Researchers and proponents of open research practises report a number of benefits of using these tools and resources: Saves time, enhances collaborations, find new sources of information, enhanced visibility, Given these benefits it is believed that the majority of researchers use or plan to use these tools in the future
Yet depsite the advantages i mentioned before, few researchers are using web 2.0 tools and resouces for dissemination many researchers are reluctant due to fears of being ‘scooped’, missinterpretation of data, copyright and IP issues, and the lack of recognition and reward (RIN 2008).
A number of our reports have highlighted the growing use and reliance of e-journals and online databases One area our report on the us of web 2.0 tools and resources did not examine in detail was the use of these resources as research tools Google Flu - estimate current flu activity around the world in near real-time E-epidemiology - adapting epidemiological data collection to the 21st century Linguistic analysis of myspace and facebook pages Ordnance survey maps Cyberpsychology Asd What is becoming clear is the distinction between the researcher as a producer and as a user of knowledge is becoming blurred.
These initiatives can have a profound effect on researcher behaviour as well as scholarly communications development But as you can see many of these policy initiatives conflict, or more importantly are perceived to conflict, in the eyes of researchers e.g. research assessment and open access/data sharing
To support these policy and technological development we are seeing a number of changes to the scholarly communications landscape This just gives an over view of some of the changes that are occurring As I mentioned previously, the development of new and innovative publishing and searching platform, tools and services being launched by commercial players as well as arising from the research communities, information service providers and knowledge intermediaries such as publishers and conference organizers There is also a move to publish research data, linking information within publications to existing data bases, and enhanced annotation of research outputs Commenting, moderating and rating are also being introduced as new ways of undertaking peer review
Whole research cycle is affect by policy, technology (including) social media and I already mentioned some changes that are happening within the publishing community and touched on peer review, but you can see that there area number of implications for the future of peer review Boundaries are starting to become blurred and there is less of a distinction between producer and user of knowledge
- Disciplinary differences – these used to be much more defined – humanities vs sciences but now we are seeing areas such digital humanities