Michael Markie talks about open reserch publishing platforms | OSFair2017 Workshop
Workshop title: Open Access Models & Platforms
Workshop overview:
What are the emerging models of Open Access for publications? Who should be involved? How are costs distributed over the stakeholders involved? How can OA platforms innovate further to embrace Open Science? This workshop will discuss and showcase the range of models available, including their costs and organisational aspects, to discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses in different academic contexts.
When: DAY 1 - PARALLEL SESSION 1 & 2
This presentation is based on the document
"The principles of planning, collecting and using citizen science data" available at:
http://www.ukeof.org.uk/documents/DataAdviceNote2.pdf
Michael Markie talks about open reserch publishing platforms | OSFair2017 Workshop
Workshop title: Open Access Models & Platforms
Workshop overview:
What are the emerging models of Open Access for publications? Who should be involved? How are costs distributed over the stakeholders involved? How can OA platforms innovate further to embrace Open Science? This workshop will discuss and showcase the range of models available, including their costs and organisational aspects, to discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses in different academic contexts.
When: DAY 1 - PARALLEL SESSION 1 & 2
This presentation is based on the document
"The principles of planning, collecting and using citizen science data" available at:
http://www.ukeof.org.uk/documents/DataAdviceNote2.pdf
The BioSharing portal - linking journal and funder data policies to databases...Peter McQuilton
A 20 minute talk on the BioSharing portal, focusing on our work to link journal and funder data policies to the databases and data standards that they recommend/endorse. This was presented as part of a session on data policies in the life sciences with representation from JISC and Springer Nature.
An introduction to open science for the Library Journal webcast Case Studies for Open Science on February 9, 2016.
http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2016/01/webcasts/case-studies-for-open-science/
In light of the recent EU decision to make all European
scientific articles freely accessible by 2020, academic
institutions must prepare to convince a considerable number
of researchers to publish their work open access. This talk
presents an example of how a university library can become
a prime mover in its institution’s work on open science.
Keywords to success are a dedicated team, collaboration with
the institution’s research administration and IT department,
and focusing on widespread information towards the
research community.
This presentation was provided by Pamela Shaw of Northwestern University during the NISO Webinar, Compliance with Funder Mandates, held on September 14, 2016
This presentation was provided by Emma Warren-Jones of Scholarcy, during the NISO event "Researcher Behaviors and the Impact of Technology," held on March 25, 2020.
Understanding impact through alternative metrics: developing library-based as...Kristi Holmes
There’s never been a more critical need to better understand the impact of research efforts. The challenging state of funding models (1) and an enhanced pressure on young investigators to stand out from the crowd magnify this need as well as the perceived value of locally based impact services. These services are leveraged by a diverse range of stakeholders, from individuals to university-level decision makers and strategists. Individuals often wish to better demonstrate impact of published works to promotion committees or describe the impact of research studies to funding agencies when applying for funding or complying with institution-level or federal reporting exercises. Research groups, departments, and institutions often wish to discover how research findings are being used to promote science and gain a better overall view of research publications and outputs.
Libraries are particularly well poised to meet the need to understand a more nuanced view of impact. Libraries are trusted, neutral parties with a tradition of service and support and often act as technology hubs on campus with IT and data expertise. Librarians are trained information professionals with information and searching skills and a keen understanding of the research, education, clinical landscape of their institution. This presentation will discuss general trends in the field, including an overview of resources, assessment frameworks and tools; strategies for partnering with stakeholders; and examples of library based service models, from basic services to highly integrated library-based core research units.
(1) http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aac5200
Alistair Smith - Institutional Repositories: for scholars or for the rest of usNational Digital Forum
How are Institutional Repositories (IRs) being used? We can get some clues from the kind of links made from the general web to IRs. Results will be presented from a project looking at the links made to the larger IRs in New Zealand; as well as three well established overseas IRs. The project examined whether links were the equivalent of formal
citations, or whether they were informal links. Formal links comprised only 1.85% of the links, indicating that IRs may not be primarily forming part of the formal research communication structure. However informal links (largely from blogs and Wikipedia) comprised 18.2% of the links made to the IRs. Subject directory links comprised almost 50% of links. These results indicate that New Zealand IRs have a useful role in making research information available to the general public, even though they do not appear to be referred to intensively by other researchers.
Presented at the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Annual Meeting 2014 at the Gaylord Resort & Convention Center in Grapevine Texas, by Spencer Keralis, Kris Helge, and Laura Waugh.
Abstract: The Open Access movement is transforming scholarly communication. Federal mandates for sharing the products of federally funded research drive scholars to rethink traditional scholarship models. The OA movement has been bedeviled by questions and misconceptions about intellectual property and copyright, peer review and quality control, predatory publications and other issues. This panel will address these concerns and help equip the AACP community with the resources to understand how Open Access can serve their scholarly endeavors.
DAF group exercise: scoping data and curation requirements, by Sarah JonesJISC KeepIt project
Learn how to use the Data Asset Framework (DAF) in a directed group exercise. This was presented as part of module 1 of a 5-module course on digital preservation tools for repository managers, presented by the JISC KeepIt project. For more on this and other presentations in this course look for the tag 'KeepIt course' in the project blog http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/keepit/
This presentation was provided by Vincent Cassidy of The IET during the NISO event "Researcher Behaviors and the Impact of Technology," held on March 25, 2020.
Presented at the Open Science Fair, Athens 6-8 September 2017, at the FOSTER Plus "Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond" workshop http://www.opensciencefair.eu/training/parallel-day-2-2/fostering-the-practical-implementation-of-open-science-in-horizon-2020-and-beyond
OSFair2017 Training | What is Open Science and why should I care?Open Science Fair
Nancy Pontika talks about opening up science & implementation.
Workshop title: Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond
Workshop overview:
This workshop will showcase some of the elements required for the transition to Open Science: services and tools, policies as guidance for good practices, and the roles of the respective actors and their networks.
DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 4 & 5
The BioSharing portal - linking journal and funder data policies to databases...Peter McQuilton
A 20 minute talk on the BioSharing portal, focusing on our work to link journal and funder data policies to the databases and data standards that they recommend/endorse. This was presented as part of a session on data policies in the life sciences with representation from JISC and Springer Nature.
An introduction to open science for the Library Journal webcast Case Studies for Open Science on February 9, 2016.
http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2016/01/webcasts/case-studies-for-open-science/
In light of the recent EU decision to make all European
scientific articles freely accessible by 2020, academic
institutions must prepare to convince a considerable number
of researchers to publish their work open access. This talk
presents an example of how a university library can become
a prime mover in its institution’s work on open science.
Keywords to success are a dedicated team, collaboration with
the institution’s research administration and IT department,
and focusing on widespread information towards the
research community.
This presentation was provided by Pamela Shaw of Northwestern University during the NISO Webinar, Compliance with Funder Mandates, held on September 14, 2016
This presentation was provided by Emma Warren-Jones of Scholarcy, during the NISO event "Researcher Behaviors and the Impact of Technology," held on March 25, 2020.
Understanding impact through alternative metrics: developing library-based as...Kristi Holmes
There’s never been a more critical need to better understand the impact of research efforts. The challenging state of funding models (1) and an enhanced pressure on young investigators to stand out from the crowd magnify this need as well as the perceived value of locally based impact services. These services are leveraged by a diverse range of stakeholders, from individuals to university-level decision makers and strategists. Individuals often wish to better demonstrate impact of published works to promotion committees or describe the impact of research studies to funding agencies when applying for funding or complying with institution-level or federal reporting exercises. Research groups, departments, and institutions often wish to discover how research findings are being used to promote science and gain a better overall view of research publications and outputs.
Libraries are particularly well poised to meet the need to understand a more nuanced view of impact. Libraries are trusted, neutral parties with a tradition of service and support and often act as technology hubs on campus with IT and data expertise. Librarians are trained information professionals with information and searching skills and a keen understanding of the research, education, clinical landscape of their institution. This presentation will discuss general trends in the field, including an overview of resources, assessment frameworks and tools; strategies for partnering with stakeholders; and examples of library based service models, from basic services to highly integrated library-based core research units.
(1) http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aac5200
Alistair Smith - Institutional Repositories: for scholars or for the rest of usNational Digital Forum
How are Institutional Repositories (IRs) being used? We can get some clues from the kind of links made from the general web to IRs. Results will be presented from a project looking at the links made to the larger IRs in New Zealand; as well as three well established overseas IRs. The project examined whether links were the equivalent of formal
citations, or whether they were informal links. Formal links comprised only 1.85% of the links, indicating that IRs may not be primarily forming part of the formal research communication structure. However informal links (largely from blogs and Wikipedia) comprised 18.2% of the links made to the IRs. Subject directory links comprised almost 50% of links. These results indicate that New Zealand IRs have a useful role in making research information available to the general public, even though they do not appear to be referred to intensively by other researchers.
Presented at the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Annual Meeting 2014 at the Gaylord Resort & Convention Center in Grapevine Texas, by Spencer Keralis, Kris Helge, and Laura Waugh.
Abstract: The Open Access movement is transforming scholarly communication. Federal mandates for sharing the products of federally funded research drive scholars to rethink traditional scholarship models. The OA movement has been bedeviled by questions and misconceptions about intellectual property and copyright, peer review and quality control, predatory publications and other issues. This panel will address these concerns and help equip the AACP community with the resources to understand how Open Access can serve their scholarly endeavors.
DAF group exercise: scoping data and curation requirements, by Sarah JonesJISC KeepIt project
Learn how to use the Data Asset Framework (DAF) in a directed group exercise. This was presented as part of module 1 of a 5-module course on digital preservation tools for repository managers, presented by the JISC KeepIt project. For more on this and other presentations in this course look for the tag 'KeepIt course' in the project blog http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/keepit/
This presentation was provided by Vincent Cassidy of The IET during the NISO event "Researcher Behaviors and the Impact of Technology," held on March 25, 2020.
Presented at the Open Science Fair, Athens 6-8 September 2017, at the FOSTER Plus "Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond" workshop http://www.opensciencefair.eu/training/parallel-day-2-2/fostering-the-practical-implementation-of-open-science-in-horizon-2020-and-beyond
OSFair2017 Training | What is Open Science and why should I care?Open Science Fair
Nancy Pontika talks about opening up science & implementation.
Workshop title: Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond
Workshop overview:
This workshop will showcase some of the elements required for the transition to Open Science: services and tools, policies as guidance for good practices, and the roles of the respective actors and their networks.
DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 4 & 5
OPEN DATA. The researcher perspective
Preface
Paul Wouters
Professor of Scientometrics,
Director of CWTS,
Leiden University
Wouter Haak
Vice President,
Research Data Management,
Elsevier
A year ago, in April 2016, Leiden University’s Centre for
Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) and Elsevier
embarked on a project to investigate open data practices
at the workbench in academic research. Knowledge
knows no borders, so to understand open data practices
comprehensively the project has been framed from the
outset as a global study. That said, both the European
Union and the Dutch government have formulated the
transformation of the scientific system into an open
innovation system as a formal policy goal. At the time
we started the project, the Amsterdam Call for Action on
Open Science had just been published under the Dutch
presidency of the Council of the European Union. However,
how are policy initiatives for open science related to the
day-to-day practices of researchers and scholars?
Open Education Research: Insights from the Global OER Graduate Network (GO-GN)Robert Farrow
This presents an overview of the Global OER Graduate Network (GO-GN) Research Methods Handbook. The aims of the GO-GN are:
- to raise the profile of research into open education,
- to offer support for those conducting PhD research in this area, and
- to develop openness as a process of research.
More than 100 doctoral and post-doctoral researchers form the core of the network with more than 200 experts, supervisors, mentors and interested parties forming a community of practice.
The Handbook was developed by members of the network who are researchers in open education, and serves as a useful starting point for anyone wishing to do research in education with a focus on OER, MOOCs or OEP.
To contextualise this approach, an accessible and brief description of the types of methods typically used in research into education and educational technology will be provided. Some of the contrasting philosophical, epistemological and ontological commitments of different research paradigms will be described. Theoretical perspectives will be outlined (though not fully explored).
The Handbook benefits from a range of illustrations (courtesy of Bryan Mathers) which are intended to make the Handbook more relatable and accessible. Reflections on the process of creating the visual journey will be shared.
Finally, the presentation will offer up for discussion a provisional model of open scholarship including open practices (agile project management; directly influencing practice; radical transparency; sharing research instruments; social media presence; networks); open science (open access; open data; open licensing); digital innovation (HCI; data science; open source technologies); and normative elements (challenging dominant narratives; promoting social justice; and reducing barriers to educational access).
Learning Outcomes:
- Delegates will benefit from an overview of research methods in open education
- Processes of open collaboration to produce a manuscript will be shared
- Supporting critical reflection on practice
From "A National Approach to Open Research Data in Ireland", a workshop held on 8 September 2017 in National Library of Ireland, organised by The National Library of Ireland, the Digital Repository of Ireland, the Research Data Alliance and Open Research Ireland.
Presentation by RIN's Director, Michael Jubb, at the Association of Subscription Agents' annual conference in February 2010. http://www.subscription-agents.org/conferences/asa-conference-2010
Sbm open science committee report to the boardBradford Hesse
In the spirit of transparency, I am uploading a mid-course presentation I made to the Board of Directors for the Society of Behavioral Medicine on the topic of Open Science. The report embodies the best thinking of some of the greatest thinkers in our field.
Open Education Research: Methodology Insights from the Global OER Graduate Ne...Robert Farrow
This session will present an overview of the Global OER Graduate Network research methods handbook. The handbook, published in 2020, was developed by members of the network who are doctoral and post-doctoral researchers in open education, and serves as a useful starting point for anyone wishing to do research in education with a focus on OER, MOOCs or OEP.
An accessible and brief description of the types of methods typically used in research into education and educational technology will be provided. Some of the contrasting philosophical, epistemological and ontological commitments of different research paradigms will be used to differentiate alternative methodologies. Theoretical perspectives will be outlined (but not fully explored).
State-of-the-art approaches will be explored and their relevance for open education explained. The presentation will use examples of current doctoral research to highlight the use of different methods, and will convey insights into using different methods as shared by the researchers. This includes reflections on using different methods, and advice for conducting similar work.
Finally, the presentation will offer up for discussion a provisional model of open scholarship including open practices (agile project management; directly influencing practice; radical transparency; sharing research instruments; social media presence; networks); open science (open access; open data; open licensing); digital innovation (HCI; data science; open source technologies); and normative elements (challenging dominant narratives; promoting social justice; and reducing barriers to educational access).
Reference:
Farrow, R., Iniesto, F., Weller, M. & Pitt., R. (2020). The GO-GN Research Methods Handbook. Open Education Research Hub. The Open University, UK. CC-BY 4.0. http://go-gn.net/gogn_outputs/research-methods-handbook/
Computers and Learning Research Group: Research methods in open education: I...Robert Farrow
This session will present an overview of the Global OER Graduate Network research methods handbook. The handbook is being developed by members of the network who are researchers in open education, and will serve as a useful starting point for anyone wishing to do research in education with a focus on OER, MOOCs or OEP.
To contextualise this approach, an accessible and brief description of the types of methods typically used in research into education and educational technology will be provided. Some of the contrasting philosophical, epistemological and ontological commitments of different research paradigms will be used to differentiate alternative methodologies. Theoretical perspectives will be outlined but not fully explored.
State-of-the-art approaches will be explored and their relevance for open education explained. The presentation will use examples of current doctoral research to highlight the use of different methods, and will convey insights into using different methods as shared by the researchers. This includes reflections on using different methods, and advice for conducting similar work.
Finally, the presentation will offer up for discussion a provisional model of open scholarship including open practices (agile project management; directly influencing practice; radical transparency; sharing research instruments; social media presence; networks); open science (open access; open data; open licensing); digital innovation (HCI; data science; open source technologies); and normative elements (challenging dominant narratives; promoting social justice; and reducing barriers to educational access).
Open from beginning to end: addressing barriers to open research - a personal...UoLResearchSupport
Open and reproducible research practises are increasingly recognised as important to scientific integrity. However, there are numerous barriers including research culture - whether as a sector, institution or discipline - lack of training and professional incentives and funding of infrastructure.
On 26 May 2021 Dr Marlene Mengoni was one of two speakers at an event exploring barriers to open research.
Dr Marlene Mengoni is a member of the Institute of Medical & Biological Engineering (IMBE) at the University of Leeds and is interested in theoretical aspects of musculoskeletal tissues biomechanics with a fundamental computational engineering approach.
Speaking from an engineering perspective, Dr Mengoni discussed how the research culture at the University of Leeds can help to foster open research practices, throughout the research cycle, including embedding "open" in research and training.
Explore the ever-evolving research landscape, uncovering emerging trends, technological impact, ethical considerations, and successful methodologies guiding the future of research.
Professor Carole Goble, University of Manchester, talks at the RIN "Research data: policies & behaviour" event as part of a series on Research Information in Transition.
Presentation from RIN hosted event on 'The future of scholarly publishing - where do we go from here?'
Part one of a series of events on the theme 'Research information in transition'.
Presentation by Michael Jubb, Director of Research Information Network, given at the Preservation Advisory Centre 'Decoding the Digital' conference at the British Library 27 July 2010.
Presentation by RIN Director Michael Jubb at Dryad repository for datasets workshop linked to published journal articles (http://datadryad.org/repo)
on 27 April 2010, London
Presentation by the RIN's Director, Michael Jubb, at the Spanish Research Council's (CSIC) workshop on the politics of the promotion of open access in Barcelona in March 2010. http://www.csic.es/web/guest/home
Presentation by the RIN's Liaison and Partnership Officer, Branwen Hide, at the British Library/JISC Digital Researchers Day on 15 March 2010 (http://explorationforchange.net/index.php/current-projects/researchers-of-tomorrow/researchers-of-tomorrow-home.html).
Covers different types of news readers/aggregators that might be of use to researchers and how to use them.
Sense About Science held a workshop on peer review in collaboration with the Research Information Network, Vitae, Elsevier and the Voice of Young Science.
This afternoon event was held at the University of Sussex, Brighton on 5 March 2010 and was free and for early career researchers in all sciences, engineering and medicine (PhD students, post-docs or equivalent in first job).
The workshop discussed the process of peer review in journal publishing and explored the criticisms of the peer review process. What does peer review do for science? Does it detect fraud and misconduct? Will it illuminate good ideas or shut them down?
The RIN’s Liason and Partnerships Officer, Branwen Hide, spoke at the event on ‘The changing scholarly communications landscape: What does this mean for peer review?’
For more information on the programme, visit http://www.rin.ac.uk/news/events/research-publishing-it-reviewing-it-and-talking-about-it-publicly
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
UK researchers' behaviour and the drive for open knowledge
1. UK researchers’ behaviours and the drive for open knowledge Branwen Hide April 24 th , 2010 Open Knowledge Conference 2010
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. Branwen Hide Liaison and Partnership Officer Research Information Network [email_address] www.rin.ac.uk
Editor's Notes
-personal background The RIN aims to enhance and broaden understanding of how researchers in the UK create and use information resources and services of all kinds and try and bridge the gap between researchers and policy makers at all levels
Increasing support for the principles of open knowledge Academia we are seeing an expansion of open access publishing and data sharing initiatives Research funders and institutions developing policies, mandates, and infrastructure Expansion of web 2.0 resources for the research community Unclear as to the extend to which researchers are engaging with the principles Overview of some work we have done over the past couple of years looking at researchers publication practises (both formal and informal), and their use of web 2.0 resources and data sharing habits.
This is some work that we have done which shows that actually not everyone is using these tool Early adopters/frequent users tend to be between 35-44 years and generally more established in their career early career researchers are more concerned about being ‘scoped’ by placing material in the public domain even when working in environments which support open practises. However, younger researchers - in particular PhD students have a higher usage of social-networking sites as compared to more established researchers Because older more established researchers already have established networks Or younger researchers use them more in their private life and find it easier to see how these sites could benefit their professional life
The extent to which standards are required for interoperability and the availability of these standards – do they exist already or do they need to be established?
Mixing open and ‘closed’ forms of working Distinct patterns of adoption
Our own work has highlighted that many researchers do not have the necessary skills to use or feel confidant to use advance searching options – as a result they may miss key information sources and have a large number of pages to scroll through Also in a world where many of our information related sources are no longer just trusted peer –reviewed literature, researchers are being asked to make judgment on quality in a way they have never had to before How do you determine the quality of a blog or a wiki? Or info on twitter? Would you trust it as research material? Would it depend why you were using it…