The UK does not officially recognize the mass killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire during World War 1 as a genocide. While acknowledging the immense suffering, the UK believes it is not for modern governments to make judgments on historical events and that the issue is one for Turkey and Armenia to resolve. The UK has close ties with Turkey as a trade partner and NATO ally, and believes its position supports reconciliation between Armenia and Turkey and regional stability. However, the UK condemns the atrocities and supports projects to promote normalization between the countries.
LEAGUE OF NATIONS: SUCCESSES.
The League successfully adjudicated the Aaland Islands dispute in 1921, preventing a military altercation between Sweden and Finland. Furthermore, the League resolved the issue of Upper Silesia in 1921, deciding to split the territory between both Germany and Poland, and bringing an end to the riots.
LEAGUE OF NATIONS: SUCCESSES.
The League successfully adjudicated the Aaland Islands dispute in 1921, preventing a military altercation between Sweden and Finland. Furthermore, the League resolved the issue of Upper Silesia in 1921, deciding to split the territory between both Germany and Poland, and bringing an end to the riots.
What is Communalism?
It is basically an ideology which consists of three elements:-
• A belief that people who follow the same religion have common secular interests i.e. they have same political, economic and social interests. So, here socio- political communalities arises.
• A notion that, in a multi-religious society like India, these common secular interests of one religion are dissimilar and divergent from the interests of the follower of another religion.
• The interests of the follower of the different religion or of different ‘communities’ are seen to be completely incompatible, antagonist and hostile.
Communalism is political trade in religion. It is an ideology on which communal politics is based. And communal violence are conjectural consequences of communal ideology.
Communalism is the greatest threat to India's existence and need to be handled with care
Brief presentation that covers the major causes of WWII, from an American history perspective. Since the videos are not embedded on this website, please visit our website to see the included videos: www.multimedialearning.org located on the "Downloads" toolbar.
This presentation is on Turkish Foreign Policy between 1923 and 1939, during Kemal Ataturk's period. It explains the central themes of foreign policy and achievements.
What is Communalism?
It is basically an ideology which consists of three elements:-
• A belief that people who follow the same religion have common secular interests i.e. they have same political, economic and social interests. So, here socio- political communalities arises.
• A notion that, in a multi-religious society like India, these common secular interests of one religion are dissimilar and divergent from the interests of the follower of another religion.
• The interests of the follower of the different religion or of different ‘communities’ are seen to be completely incompatible, antagonist and hostile.
Communalism is political trade in religion. It is an ideology on which communal politics is based. And communal violence are conjectural consequences of communal ideology.
Communalism is the greatest threat to India's existence and need to be handled with care
Brief presentation that covers the major causes of WWII, from an American history perspective. Since the videos are not embedded on this website, please visit our website to see the included videos: www.multimedialearning.org located on the "Downloads" toolbar.
This presentation is on Turkish Foreign Policy between 1923 and 1939, during Kemal Ataturk's period. It explains the central themes of foreign policy and achievements.
The Roles of Realism and Constructivism in the 1915 Armenian GenocideJerome Torossian
This paper primarily focuses on why the 1915 Armenian Genocide occurred in the last days of the Ottoman Empire. This question will mainly be investigated by looking at the roles of national interests via realism and moral norms via constructivism. The goal will be to distinguish which of the two theories played a major role in this crime against humanity.
Running head THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE1THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE .docxtoltonkendal
Running head: THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE 1
THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE 5
Title: The Armenian Genocide
Name:
Instructor’s Name:
Institution:
Introduction
The Armenian genocide refers to a campaign by the government of the Ottoman Empire to get rid of the minority Armenian citizens from their ancestral land in the empire. The Ottoman Empire existed between 1300 and 1923. At the height of its success in the 1600s the empire controlled cast territories in Southeast Europe, Western Asia and North Africa. The capital of the Empire was in Istanbul (Constantinople) the empire was headed by a Sultan who had absolute authority over his subjects. The Turks practiced Islam and the empire was governed based on Islamic law. During the 15th and 16th centuries Armenia was brought under Ottoman rule (Kervokian, 2011). The Armenians were a Christian minority and they mainly occupied the eastern provinces of the empire although significant populations could be found in the Western provinces as well as in the capital Constantinople. The Armenians lived as second class citizens in the empire and were denied many rights. For instance their lives and property were not protected by law; they were barred from participating in government and they were also forced to pay more taxes. However for the most part there were no violent conflict and minority populations within the empire prospered as the empire’s economy expanded.
Circumstances Leading To the Genocide
In the middle of the 19th century, three great powers of Europe i.e. Britain, France and Russia began to pressure the Ottoman to grant equal rights to all its subjects. This period was known as the Tanzimat period and some of the reforms instituted include; replacement of religious laws with secular law and reforms in the banking sector among others. However the Muslims in the empire rejected the idea of equality with Christians. Toward the late 1870s the Greeks together with a number of Christian nations under the Ottoman Empire who were displeased by mistreatment, had acquired independence from the Ottoman rule often with the help of great powers of Europe. During this period the empire was also in decline and major European powers were jostling for territories which the empire previously controlled. To finance the war the empire borrowed large sums of money from European banks. Later in 1875 the Ottoman state was unable to service the loans and declared bankruptcy (Taner, 2007).
Rise of Armenian Nationalism
In the late 1860s and early 1870s, Armenian intellectuals began calls for better treatment from the government. Their demands included police protection from the looting and killing perpetrated by Muslim communities, administrative reforms and they also wanted Christian testimonies to be admitted in court. The Ottoman government did not act on these demands and in the contrary they invited further oppression ...
A review of the historical background of the Genocide, its features, the political debate which followed and why it is still a diplomatic 'hot potato' 100 years after the event.
Armenian Genocide and Holocaust Comparison
Armenian People During WW1
The Armenian Genocide Essay
The Armenian Genocide
Armenia Genocide Essay
Write An Essay On The Armenian Genocide
Armenian Genocide Essay
Armenian Genocide Research Paper
Argumentative Essay On The Armenian Genocide
The Armenian Genocide Essay
Armenian Genocide Case Study
Armenian Genocide Summary
Turkish Armenian Genocide
Armenian Genocide Report
Armenian Genocide Research Paper
The Armenian Genocide
Armenian Genocide: A Case Study
Evidence of the Armenian Genocide Essay
Armenian Genocide Research Paper
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
2. What is the Armenian Genocide?
The extermination of Armenians in the Ottoman
Empire and the surrounding regions during 1915-
1923 is called the Armenian Genocide.
Those massacres were masterminded and
perpetrated by the government of Young Turks
and were later finalized by the Kemalist
government.
The First World War gave the Young Turks the
opportunity to settle accounts with Armenians
living in the Ottoman Empire, thus implementing
the decision of the secret meeting of 1911 in
Thessaloniki. The plan was to tukify the Muslims
and to exterminate the Armenians living in the
Ottoman Empire. Talaat Pasha (Interior Minister),
Enver Pasha (Minister of Military Affairs), Djemal
Pasha (commander of the Palestinian Front),
Behaeddin Shakir Bey (Young Turk Central
Committee member) and others were among the
orchestrators of the project.
3. What is the Armenian Genocide?
Intending to annihilate Armenians, they
wanted to eliminate the Armenian
Question. Armenia and Armenians were an
obstacle on the way of the project of the
Yong Turks. Their dream of “Great Turan”
was to stretch from the Bosporus to Altai.
During the First World War the Young Turks
perpetrated massacres against Assyrians,
Greeks and Arabs living in the Ottoman
Empire.
In February 1915 the military minister
Envier Pasha ordered to eliminate the
Armenian soldiers serving in the Army. On
April 24 and the following days 800
Armenians were arrested in Constantinople
and exiled to the depths of Anatolia.
4. What is the Armenian Genocide ?
Armenian writers, journalists, doctors,
scientists, clergymen, intellectuals
including Armenian members of the
parliament were among them. A part
of them died on the way of the exile,
while others died after reaching there.
The first international response to the
violence resulted in a joint statement
by France, Russia and the Great Britain
in May 1915, where the Turkish
atrocities against the Armenians were
defined as “a crime against humanity
and civilization”. According to them,
Turkish government was responsible
for the implementation of the crime.
5. Why was the Armenian Genocide
perpetrated?
When WWI erupted; the government of the
Young Turks adopted the policy of Pan-
Turkism, hoping to save the remains of the
weakened Ottoman Empire. The plan was to
create an enormous Ottoman Empire that
would spread to China, include all the
Turkish speaking nations of the Caucasus
and Middle Asia, intending also to turkify all
the ethnic minorities of the empire. The
Armenian population became the main
obstacle standing in the way of the
realization of this policy. Besides, the
constitution restored after the Revolution of
1908 promised equal rights to all citizens of
the Ottoman Empire. Armenians
enthusiastically embraced this opportunity;
however the change of status of previously
deprived Armenians increased the hostility
of the Turks towards Christians.
6. Why was the Armenian Genocide
perpetrated?
This hostility was formed long ago, as
even in the conditions of deprivation
Armenians of the Ottoman empire
provided unprecedented social, cultural
and economic development. The
genocide was a means to suppress this
ascent, as well as to seize the Armenian
wealth created during decades.
The Young Turks used WWI as a suitable
opportunity for the implementation of
the Armenian genocide, although it was
planned in 1911-1912.
There were an estimated two million
Armenians living in the Ottoman Empire
before the First World War.
Approximately one and a half million
Armenians were killed from 1915-1923.
The remaining part was either Islamized
or exiled.
7. British Government Rejects Genocide
Recognition
London (PA News) A bid to get the
British Government to recognize as
"genocide" the deportation and
massacre and slaughter of thousands
of Armenians by the Ottoman
government of Turkey in 1915, was
rejected by ministers in the Lords.
Foreign Office spokesman, Baroness
Ramsay of Cart vale, said the British
Government had condemned the
massacres at the time.
She added, "the present British
Government, like its predecessors, in
no way dissents from that view, nor
do we seek to deny what happened or
try to play down the extent of the
tragedy. The Government announced.
8. British Government Rejects Genocide
Recognition
"But in the absence of unequivocal
evidence that the Ottoman administration
took a specific decision to eliminate the
Armenians under their control at that time,
British governments have not recognized
those events as indications of genocide.
"Nor do we believe it is the business of
governments of today to review events of
over 80 years ago, with a view to
pronouncing on them. The events of 1915-
16 remain a painful issue in relation to two
states with which we enjoy excellent
relations.
"For our part, it is better to look forward
rather than back. We hope Turkey and
Armenia will be able to overcome their
legacy of bitterness. The right approach is to
urge the peoples of the region to look to
the future."
9. What is the Great Britain's position regarding
Armenian Genocide in 1915?
The representatives of Great Britain told
that they recognize and deeply regret the
terrible suffering inflicted on the
Armenian people in 1915. Reading the
scholarship, visiting the Tsitsernakaberd
Museum, seeing the photos and the
written testimony, is enormously moving.
They believe it is vitally important to
honor the memory of the victims; and
they must make sure they draw the
necessary lessons from history. But while
they must never forget the past, they
believe that their priority today should be
to promote reconciliation between the
peoples and Governments of Armenia and
Turkey and to find a way for Armenia and
Turkey, as the countries which have
inherited this tragic joint history, to
address that history together. They want
to encourage and support any process
which will help both countries to do that.
10. What is the Great Britain's position
regarding Armenian Genocide in 1915?
The UK position is that we do not
recognize the massacres as “genocide” –
this issue is one for Turkey and Armenia
to resolve between themselves.
Progress towards normalization of
bilateral relations between Turkey and
Armenia was halted in April 2010 as a
result of Turkey linking ratification of the
relevant protocols with progress on the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.
Normalizations could bring long term
benefits for the peace and stability of
the whole region. The UK has supported
a number of projects designed to
promote normalization of Turkey-
Armenia relations. These have included
a Turkish film festival in Yerevan, a
touring theatre production about the
Turkish/Armenian relationship and
bringing together activists in both
countries to discuss EU integration.
11. Is it possible to say that Turkey has a role in UK's
status of not recognizing Armenian Genocide?
They have a strong relationship with
Turkey, both as a trade and
investment partner, and as a
strategic ally in NATO. They strongly
support the accession of Turkey to
the EU, believing that a modern,
democratic Turkey bound to Europe
with strong institutional, cultural and
economic ties is in their best
interests and in the best interests of
the wider region. But their position
on this issue remains based on the
view that there has to be a process
of reconciliation led by Armenia and
Turkey themselves.
12. Is it possible to say that Turkey has a role in UK's
status of not recognizing Armenian Genocide?
As we have discovered in Europe,
after the terrible destruction and
barbarity of war – it is much
easier to become reconciled, to
build trust, to face up to history,
when you are building up a web
of relationships economically,
culturally, and politically. This
was, in fact, the founding
principle of the EU – after the
horrors of war, to bring, in the
first place, countries’ economies
together, to create institutions
where common interests could be
explored and deepened, to give a
future focus to the process of
reconciliation.
13. Is it possible to say that Turkey has a role in
UK's status of not recognizing Armenian
Genocide?
The UK’s excellent relationship
with Turkey is long-standing
and based on a wide range of
bilateral and multilateral issues.
Turkey is a key strategic ally in
the region on a number of
international issues, such as
Syria, Cyprus and the EU. But
the UK government position on
this issue is based on their
assessment of what is best for
the stability and security of the
entire region, including both
Armenia and Turkey.