SYMBOLIC
INTERACTIONISM
BEVERLY V. SANTIAGO
Presenter
Symbols & Interaction
•Symbols are context based and
products of social interaction
•Interactions are social behavior
made up of communication to
which one of the individuals reacts,
consequently causing a change in
behavior
•Could be verbal or non-verbal
•What are some examples of subtle
messages from individuals that
might alter your behavior?
What is symbolic interactionism?
a micro-level theoretical
framework and perspective in
sociology that addresses
how society is created and
maintained through repeated
interactions among individuals.
 is the process of interaction in
the formation of meanings for
individuals(Blumer)
SIMPLER MEANING
Tends us focus on the language and
symbols that help us give meaning to the
experiences in our life
A theory of social behaviour
and interaction
Theorist
emerged in the mid-twentieth
century from a variety of
influences
George Herbert Mead (1934)
Relationship
between self
and society
3 Principles
1. Meaning
Symbolic Interactionism holds the principal
of meaning to be the central aspect of human
behavior
2. Language
gives humans a means by which to
negotiate meaning through symbols. Humans
identify meaning in speech acts with others.
3. Thought
modifies each individual’s interpretation of
symbols. Thought is a mental conversation that
requires different points of view.
Acts and Social Acts
• In analyzing the phases of the act, Mead
meant to call attention to the interplay
between the internal processes and
external manifestations exhibited in
human behavior.
Phases of Acts
a. Impulse
An act starts with an impulse, which occurs when our
existing adjustment or line of activity is disturbed
b. Perception
We begin to name or designate objects and thus give our
acts direction.
c. Manipulation
At this stage, we take concrete steps to reach our goal.
d. Consummation
Finally, the act ends with consummation, when our
original adjustment or line of activity is restored.
Types of Acts
1. Individual (Interaction with Self)
-An act that involves only one individual. Thus, there exists
no social component, simply a human being and an object
or set of objects interacting.
2. Social act (Interaction with Others)
In Mead’s words, a social act is one that involves the
cooperation of more than one individual, and whose object
as defined by the act is a social
Object
Social acts and symbolic interaction i. In order for people
to engage in social interaction, and thus complete the
social obj ect of a social act, they must first be able to
interpret – assign meaning to one another’s acts.
According to Mead, “meaning” is
triadic.
Meaning is Triadic
i. When an individual acts (by
making a verbal exchange or
gesture) he or she:
1. Indicates to the other what he or
she plans to do.
2. What the other is expected to do
in return.
3. What social object they are
creating.
MEAD
the relationship between self and
society
that individuals use language and
significant symbols in their
communication with others
Symbolic interactionists are often
less concerned with objective
structure than with subjective
meaning – how repeated, meaningful
interactions among individuals come
to define the makeup of ‘society
BLUMER
individuals act based on the meanings
objects have for them;
interaction occurs within a particular social
and cultural context in which physical and
social objects (persons), as well as situations,
must be defined or categorized based on
individual meanings;
 meanings emerge from interactions with
other individuals and with society; and
 meanings are continuously created and
recreated through interpreting processes
during interaction with others
• Herbert Blumer was actually a student of Mead, and he expanded on
Mead's discussion of the self in relation to social behavior. Despite
much of the groundwork being established by Mead, Blumer is
traditionally known for being the brains behind the theory of
symbolic interactionism. In fact, it was his work Symbolic
Interactionism: Perspective and Method that synthesized his
contributions with those of Mead and Cooley and coined the term
symbolic interaction.
• Blumer argued that people's behavior is based on the meaning those
behaviors have to them. Those meanings are based on and derived
from interactions an individual has with others. It's important to note
that these meanings are subject to change based on an individual's
interpretation.
•Human beings respond to
things based on their subjective
meanings
•Meaning occurs through
interaction between people.
•Meaning is based on
experience, an interpretative
process.
Cooley: “Looking Glass Self”
•Individuals think about:
- how they appear to others
- make a judgment about what others think of
them
-incorporate those ideas into perception of self
•How do you interpret other’s reactions to you?
Most learning takes place “face to face,” especially
in primary groups
What does “face to face” mean in the digital age?
Families teach us about social expectations & how
we excel
Looking Glass Self
“ I am not what I think I am
and I am not what you
think I am; I am what I
think you think I am.
Symbolic  Interactionism

Symbolic Interactionism

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Symbols & Interaction •Symbolsare context based and products of social interaction •Interactions are social behavior made up of communication to which one of the individuals reacts, consequently causing a change in behavior •Could be verbal or non-verbal •What are some examples of subtle messages from individuals that might alter your behavior?
  • 3.
    What is symbolicinteractionism? a micro-level theoretical framework and perspective in sociology that addresses how society is created and maintained through repeated interactions among individuals.  is the process of interaction in the formation of meanings for individuals(Blumer) SIMPLER MEANING
  • 4.
    Tends us focuson the language and symbols that help us give meaning to the experiences in our life A theory of social behaviour and interaction
  • 5.
    Theorist emerged in themid-twentieth century from a variety of influences George Herbert Mead (1934) Relationship between self and society
  • 6.
    3 Principles 1. Meaning SymbolicInteractionism holds the principal of meaning to be the central aspect of human behavior 2. Language gives humans a means by which to negotiate meaning through symbols. Humans identify meaning in speech acts with others. 3. Thought modifies each individual’s interpretation of symbols. Thought is a mental conversation that requires different points of view.
  • 7.
    Acts and SocialActs • In analyzing the phases of the act, Mead meant to call attention to the interplay between the internal processes and external manifestations exhibited in human behavior.
  • 8.
    Phases of Acts a.Impulse An act starts with an impulse, which occurs when our existing adjustment or line of activity is disturbed b. Perception We begin to name or designate objects and thus give our acts direction. c. Manipulation At this stage, we take concrete steps to reach our goal. d. Consummation Finally, the act ends with consummation, when our original adjustment or line of activity is restored.
  • 9.
    Types of Acts 1.Individual (Interaction with Self) -An act that involves only one individual. Thus, there exists no social component, simply a human being and an object or set of objects interacting. 2. Social act (Interaction with Others) In Mead’s words, a social act is one that involves the cooperation of more than one individual, and whose object as defined by the act is a social Object Social acts and symbolic interaction i. In order for people to engage in social interaction, and thus complete the social obj ect of a social act, they must first be able to interpret – assign meaning to one another’s acts. According to Mead, “meaning” is triadic.
  • 10.
    Meaning is Triadic i.When an individual acts (by making a verbal exchange or gesture) he or she: 1. Indicates to the other what he or she plans to do. 2. What the other is expected to do in return. 3. What social object they are creating.
  • 11.
    MEAD the relationship betweenself and society that individuals use language and significant symbols in their communication with others Symbolic interactionists are often less concerned with objective structure than with subjective meaning – how repeated, meaningful interactions among individuals come to define the makeup of ‘society
  • 12.
    BLUMER individuals act basedon the meanings objects have for them; interaction occurs within a particular social and cultural context in which physical and social objects (persons), as well as situations, must be defined or categorized based on individual meanings;  meanings emerge from interactions with other individuals and with society; and  meanings are continuously created and recreated through interpreting processes during interaction with others
  • 13.
    • Herbert Blumerwas actually a student of Mead, and he expanded on Mead's discussion of the self in relation to social behavior. Despite much of the groundwork being established by Mead, Blumer is traditionally known for being the brains behind the theory of symbolic interactionism. In fact, it was his work Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method that synthesized his contributions with those of Mead and Cooley and coined the term symbolic interaction. • Blumer argued that people's behavior is based on the meaning those behaviors have to them. Those meanings are based on and derived from interactions an individual has with others. It's important to note that these meanings are subject to change based on an individual's interpretation.
  • 14.
    •Human beings respondto things based on their subjective meanings •Meaning occurs through interaction between people. •Meaning is based on experience, an interpretative process.
  • 15.
    Cooley: “Looking GlassSelf” •Individuals think about: - how they appear to others - make a judgment about what others think of them -incorporate those ideas into perception of self •How do you interpret other’s reactions to you? Most learning takes place “face to face,” especially in primary groups What does “face to face” mean in the digital age? Families teach us about social expectations & how we excel Looking Glass Self
  • 16.
    “ I amnot what I think I am and I am not what you think I am; I am what I think you think I am.

Editor's Notes

  • #3 The inspiration for this theory came from Dewey (1981), which believed that human beings are best understood in a practical, interactive relation to their environment.
  • #4 The inspiration for this theory came from Dewey (1981), which believed that human beings are best understood in a practical, interactive relation to their environment.
  • #5 As we interact with the world, we change the way we behave It is how people navigate their interactions with others and assign meanings based on their interpretation of those interaction (social behaviour, collective behaviour of a group which is called macro level of a group of interaction)
  • #6 He discusses “self” which is dynamic organism that is a being of its own. The self is breakdown into 2 processes or phases. The I, the unorganized response of the self to the attitudes of others. The ME is the oragnized set of attitudes that the individual assumes in response (those prospectives of the self that the individual interpreted from others.
  • #7 Meaning states that humans act toward people and things according to the meanings that give to those people or things.
  • #8 The individual’s act does not consist merely of what may be observed by others, but also entails an internal process of control in which the individual directs conduct toward some goal or object.
  • #9 In other words, we might simply suggest that an act begins with a problem to be solved, a goal to be reached, something to be overcome by the human being in the Environment b.
  • #13 emphasized how the self emerges from an interactive process of joint action (Denzin, 1992). Blumer, like Mead, saw individuals as engaged in ‘mind action’: humans do not ponder on themselves and their relationships to others sometimes
  • #16 People use ‘the looking-glass self’: they take the role of the other, imagining how we look to another person. The self is a function of language, without talk there would be no self concept. People are part of a community, where our generalized other is the sum total of responses and expectations that we pick up from the people around us. We naturally give more weight to the views of significant others
  • #17 This means that we as individuals define how we perceive ourselves by how we think others perceive us. Example first day f high school