M. George Bush
M170281CE
 "Remediate" means to solve a problem, and "bio-remediate" means
to use biological organisms to solve an environmental problem such as
contaminated soil or groundwater.
 Bioremediation is a source control, risk reduction and pollution
prevention process.
 Bioremediation processes reduce the toxicity and migration potential
of organic compounds.
 Organic compounds are microbially converted to simpler compounds
 Uses naturally occurring microorganisms to break down hazardous
substances into less toxic or nontoxic substance
Microorganisms include:
 Bacteria (aerobic and anaerobic)
 Fungi
 Actinomycetes (filamentous bacteria)
 Microorganisms destroy organic contaminants in the course of using
the chemicals for their own growth and reproduction
 Organic chemicals provide: carbon, source of cell building material
electrons, source of energy
 Cells catalyze oxidation of organic chemicals (electron donors),
causing transfer of electrons from organic chemicals to some
electron acceptor
 In aerobic oxidation, acceptor is oxygen
 In anaerobic, acceptor is (with decreasing efficiency):
nitrate, manganese, iron.
 Microorganisms also need essential nutrients such as
nitrogen and phosphorus
 Microorganisms
 Toxicity
 Available soil water
 Oxygen
 Electron acceptors
 Redox potential
 PH
 Nutrients
 Temperature
 Water Solubility
The potential advantages of applying biodegradation principles to
the cleanup of contaminated sites include:
 Can be done on site.
 Keeps site disruption to a minimum (very important in beaches)
 Using a in situ Bioremediation the risk of being exposed to the
contaminant or pollutant is eliminated. As there is minimal
excavation , therefore contact is reduced.
• Eliminates transportation costs and liabilities
• The process of bioremediation is a natural biological process
therefore there is a minimal environmental impact from the
treatment processes.
• The costs should be lower than other systems with more expensive
input requirements.
The main disadvantages of bioremediation are :
• It does not suit all situations, it is site specific.
• The process of bioremediation is generally a slow process (several
months)
• All hazardous wastes cannot be degradated. Many metals destroy
and are highly toxic to microorganisms thus no biological
degradation can take place.
 In situ bioremediation
 Ex situ bioremediation
 It involves direct approach for the microbial degradation of
xenobiotics at the sites of pollution (soil, ground water).
There are 2 types of in situ bioremediation.
 intrinsic bioremediation
 accelerated bioremediation
Land Bioremediation
 Bioventing
 In situ biodegradation
 Biostimulation
 Biosparging
 Bioaugmentation
 Intrinsic bioremediation uses microorganisms already present in the
environment to biodegrade harmful contaminant.
 There is no human intervention involved in this type of bioremediation,
and since it is the cheapest means of bioremediation available, it is the
most commonly used.
 In accelerated bioremediation, either substrate or nutrients are
added to the environment to help break down the toxic spill by
making the microorganisms grow more rapidly.
 The most common in situ treatment and involves supplying air and
nutrients through wells to contaminated soil to stimulate the bacteria.
In situ biodegradation
 involves supplying oxygen and nutrients by circulating aqueous solutions
through contaminated soils to stimulate naturally occurring bacteria to
degrade organic contaminants.
Biostimulation
 fertilizers are added to a contaminated environment to stimulate the growth
of indigenous microorganisms that can degrade pollutants
Bioaugmentation
 bacteria are added to the contaminated environment to support
indigenous microbes with biodegradative processes
 involves the injection of air under pressure below the water table to
increase groundwater oxygen concentrations and enhance the rate of
biological degradation of contaminants by naturally occurring bacteria.
Introduction
 Wastewaters discharged by the industries are one of the major
causes of environmental pollution.
 Pulp and paper manufacturing is one of the oldest and largest
industry in India with an installed capacity of about three million
metric tones per annum finished product.
 An average about 300 m3 water is consumed per ton of paper
produced, the industry generates a huge volume of highly colored
and toxic effluents.
 About 500 different chlorinated organic compounds have been
identified in paper mill effluent.
 The high chemical diversity of these pollutants causes a variety of
clastogenic, carcinogenic, endocrinic and mutagenic effects on fishes
and other aquatic communities
 The most widely used biological treatment system is activated
sludge process. However, it also is ineffective in total removal of
colour and toxicity of the effluents .
 In view of these problems, recent research has been focused on
biotechnological approaches with white-rot fungi (WRF) due to their
powerful lignin-degrading enzyme system.
Contamination values
BOD(mg/l) 910
COD(mg/l) 2013
DO(mg/l) 0
electrical conductivity (Ms/cm) 12.10
Chloride(mg/l) 308
PH 6.5
TDS(ppt) 7.10
Total phenol(mg/l) 1.04
Salinity(ppt) 8.5
Colour(platinum–cobalt units) 2967.13
 Isolation of fungal strains and biochemical tests
 Immobilization of fungal consortium
 Analytical methods
 All the parameters showed marked decline during the 12h of
treatment.
 EC declined from initial value of 12.1 to 7.6 mS/cm (37.2% decrease)
 TDS declined from 7.1 to 4.2 ppt (41% decrease) in the 12 h.
 Salinity likewise declined from 8.5 to 5.2 ppt during the same period
(39% reduction).
 Concomitant with the decline in pH, there was also a steep decolorization
of the effluent to the extent of about 65%
 Earlier studies on decolorization of the paper mill effluents using
various fungal species have reported 70–90% decolorization in 2–10
days .
 The level of color reduction in the present study is better or at least
comparable to these reports. However, the most important aspect
of present study is that there was a very high reduction in the COD
of the effluent (89% in 4 days).
 Bioremediation, its Applications to Contaminated Sites in India,
Ministry of Environment & Forests.
 Piyush Malaviya a, V.S. Rathore- Bioremediation of pulp and paper
mill effluent by a novel fungal consortium isolated from polluted
soil.
 Kumar.A ,Bisht.B.S, Joshi.V.D , Dhewa.T , 2011,Review on
Bioremediation of Polluted Environment: A Management Tool,Int. J.
Env. Sci., Vol 1, No 6,

Soil bioremediation

  • 1.
  • 2.
     "Remediate" meansto solve a problem, and "bio-remediate" means to use biological organisms to solve an environmental problem such as contaminated soil or groundwater.
  • 3.
     Bioremediation isa source control, risk reduction and pollution prevention process.  Bioremediation processes reduce the toxicity and migration potential of organic compounds.  Organic compounds are microbially converted to simpler compounds
  • 4.
     Uses naturallyoccurring microorganisms to break down hazardous substances into less toxic or nontoxic substance
  • 5.
    Microorganisms include:  Bacteria(aerobic and anaerobic)  Fungi  Actinomycetes (filamentous bacteria)
  • 6.
     Microorganisms destroyorganic contaminants in the course of using the chemicals for their own growth and reproduction  Organic chemicals provide: carbon, source of cell building material electrons, source of energy  Cells catalyze oxidation of organic chemicals (electron donors), causing transfer of electrons from organic chemicals to some electron acceptor
  • 7.
     In aerobicoxidation, acceptor is oxygen  In anaerobic, acceptor is (with decreasing efficiency): nitrate, manganese, iron.  Microorganisms also need essential nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus
  • 8.
     Microorganisms  Toxicity Available soil water  Oxygen  Electron acceptors  Redox potential  PH  Nutrients  Temperature  Water Solubility
  • 10.
    The potential advantagesof applying biodegradation principles to the cleanup of contaminated sites include:  Can be done on site.  Keeps site disruption to a minimum (very important in beaches)  Using a in situ Bioremediation the risk of being exposed to the contaminant or pollutant is eliminated. As there is minimal excavation , therefore contact is reduced.
  • 11.
    • Eliminates transportationcosts and liabilities • The process of bioremediation is a natural biological process therefore there is a minimal environmental impact from the treatment processes. • The costs should be lower than other systems with more expensive input requirements.
  • 12.
    The main disadvantagesof bioremediation are : • It does not suit all situations, it is site specific. • The process of bioremediation is generally a slow process (several months) • All hazardous wastes cannot be degradated. Many metals destroy and are highly toxic to microorganisms thus no biological degradation can take place.
  • 13.
     In situbioremediation  Ex situ bioremediation
  • 14.
     It involvesdirect approach for the microbial degradation of xenobiotics at the sites of pollution (soil, ground water). There are 2 types of in situ bioremediation.  intrinsic bioremediation  accelerated bioremediation
  • 15.
    Land Bioremediation  Bioventing In situ biodegradation  Biostimulation  Biosparging  Bioaugmentation
  • 16.
     Intrinsic bioremediationuses microorganisms already present in the environment to biodegrade harmful contaminant.  There is no human intervention involved in this type of bioremediation, and since it is the cheapest means of bioremediation available, it is the most commonly used.
  • 17.
     In acceleratedbioremediation, either substrate or nutrients are added to the environment to help break down the toxic spill by making the microorganisms grow more rapidly.
  • 18.
     The mostcommon in situ treatment and involves supplying air and nutrients through wells to contaminated soil to stimulate the bacteria.
  • 19.
    In situ biodegradation involves supplying oxygen and nutrients by circulating aqueous solutions through contaminated soils to stimulate naturally occurring bacteria to degrade organic contaminants. Biostimulation  fertilizers are added to a contaminated environment to stimulate the growth of indigenous microorganisms that can degrade pollutants Bioaugmentation  bacteria are added to the contaminated environment to support indigenous microbes with biodegradative processes
  • 20.
     involves theinjection of air under pressure below the water table to increase groundwater oxygen concentrations and enhance the rate of biological degradation of contaminants by naturally occurring bacteria.
  • 22.
    Introduction  Wastewaters dischargedby the industries are one of the major causes of environmental pollution.  Pulp and paper manufacturing is one of the oldest and largest industry in India with an installed capacity of about three million metric tones per annum finished product.
  • 23.
     An averageabout 300 m3 water is consumed per ton of paper produced, the industry generates a huge volume of highly colored and toxic effluents.  About 500 different chlorinated organic compounds have been identified in paper mill effluent.  The high chemical diversity of these pollutants causes a variety of clastogenic, carcinogenic, endocrinic and mutagenic effects on fishes and other aquatic communities
  • 24.
     The mostwidely used biological treatment system is activated sludge process. However, it also is ineffective in total removal of colour and toxicity of the effluents .  In view of these problems, recent research has been focused on biotechnological approaches with white-rot fungi (WRF) due to their powerful lignin-degrading enzyme system.
  • 25.
    Contamination values BOD(mg/l) 910 COD(mg/l)2013 DO(mg/l) 0 electrical conductivity (Ms/cm) 12.10 Chloride(mg/l) 308 PH 6.5 TDS(ppt) 7.10 Total phenol(mg/l) 1.04 Salinity(ppt) 8.5 Colour(platinum–cobalt units) 2967.13
  • 26.
     Isolation offungal strains and biochemical tests  Immobilization of fungal consortium  Analytical methods
  • 27.
     All theparameters showed marked decline during the 12h of treatment.  EC declined from initial value of 12.1 to 7.6 mS/cm (37.2% decrease)  TDS declined from 7.1 to 4.2 ppt (41% decrease) in the 12 h.  Salinity likewise declined from 8.5 to 5.2 ppt during the same period (39% reduction).
  • 28.
     Concomitant withthe decline in pH, there was also a steep decolorization of the effluent to the extent of about 65%
  • 30.
     Earlier studieson decolorization of the paper mill effluents using various fungal species have reported 70–90% decolorization in 2–10 days .  The level of color reduction in the present study is better or at least comparable to these reports. However, the most important aspect of present study is that there was a very high reduction in the COD of the effluent (89% in 4 days).
  • 31.
     Bioremediation, itsApplications to Contaminated Sites in India, Ministry of Environment & Forests.  Piyush Malaviya a, V.S. Rathore- Bioremediation of pulp and paper mill effluent by a novel fungal consortium isolated from polluted soil.  Kumar.A ,Bisht.B.S, Joshi.V.D , Dhewa.T , 2011,Review on Bioremediation of Polluted Environment: A Management Tool,Int. J. Env. Sci., Vol 1, No 6,