This document provides a summary of the history and evolution of science from ancient times to the present. It begins with early natural sciences and philosophers like Aristotle and progresses through major developments and shifts in paradigms. These include the scientific revolution of the 16th-17th centuries with figures like Copernicus, Galileo, Newton establishing modern science. It then discusses developments in the 19th century like Darwin's theory of evolution, germ theory, and advances in physics. The 20th century brought developments like relativity, quantum mechanics, and the growing role of science in technology and warfare. The document raises questions about the nature, goals, and social construction of science as well as critiques like those of Kuhn and Foucault regarding parad
Science for Change Agents, Innovators & Entrepreneurs. Day 1
A fast forward through history from Aristotle to Chaos Theory
The positivist dream
Relativity, Quantum Theory & Uncertainty
The Scientific Method (induction, deduction, repeatability, falsifiability)
Science becomes social science: Durkheim, Weber & Anthropology
Social Science: Explanation vs Understanding vs Liberation
Kuhn, paradigms and the sociology of science
Foucault and the Frankfurt School criticise science and its power
The Lenses and Methodologies of Social Science: Discourse analysis, semiotics, qualitative research, quantitative research, participant observation
MASTERCLASS FOR KAOS PILOTS, DENMARK
Unit 1 for the "Values in Science and Technology" module of the "Systems of Knowledge" course.
This unit covers the following topics:
- Ancient science
- The empirical approach in modern science
- Types of sciences - natural and social sciences, pure and applied sciences)
- Core characteristics of science
- The importance of scientific literacy
Science for Change Agents, Innovators & Entrepreneurs. Day 1
A fast forward through history from Aristotle to Chaos Theory
The positivist dream
Relativity, Quantum Theory & Uncertainty
The Scientific Method (induction, deduction, repeatability, falsifiability)
Science becomes social science: Durkheim, Weber & Anthropology
Social Science: Explanation vs Understanding vs Liberation
Kuhn, paradigms and the sociology of science
Foucault and the Frankfurt School criticise science and its power
The Lenses and Methodologies of Social Science: Discourse analysis, semiotics, qualitative research, quantitative research, participant observation
MASTERCLASS FOR KAOS PILOTS, DENMARK
Unit 1 for the "Values in Science and Technology" module of the "Systems of Knowledge" course.
This unit covers the following topics:
- Ancient science
- The empirical approach in modern science
- Types of sciences - natural and social sciences, pure and applied sciences)
- Core characteristics of science
- The importance of scientific literacy
The contemporary philosophy of science (epistemology) featuring K.Popper, T.Kuhn, I.Lakatos, P.Feyerabend, Hanson among others, has exercised a decisive critique to the dominant views of the positivist and neo-positivist model of knowledge and has in fact undermined its credibility.
Evolutionary epistemology versus faith and justified true belief: Does scien...William Hall
This presentation explores the basis for scientific rationality by testing our claims about the world against nature as described by Karl Popper's evolutionary epistemology versus accepting claims based on justified true belief. The presentation is particularly concerned to show the philosophical problems with religious fundamentalism.
The contemporary philosophy of science (epistemology) featuring K.Popper, T.Kuhn, I.Lakatos, P.Feyerabend, Hanson among others, has exercised a decisive critique to the dominant views of the positivist and neo-positivist model of knowledge and has in fact undermined its credibility.
Evolutionary epistemology versus faith and justified true belief: Does scien...William Hall
This presentation explores the basis for scientific rationality by testing our claims about the world against nature as described by Karl Popper's evolutionary epistemology versus accepting claims based on justified true belief. The presentation is particularly concerned to show the philosophical problems with religious fundamentalism.
A story engineering model for change-makers, innovators and intentional / social entrepreneurs. Its Work-In-Progress but coming along nicely. Given to a band of wonderful ethical entrepreneurs at Amherst College in August 2011 in partnership with Sansori.
Session on Impact Models, Business Models for Impact and Impact Measurement / Metrics design. Jakarta 2012. Features some sophisticated tools for social innovation.
Past civilisations have nurtured small populations of those trying to understand and manipulate nature to some advantage in materials, tools, weapons, food, and wealth. However, they never formed communities and lacked the means of recording, communicating, and sharing successes and failures. They also lacked a common framework/philosophy to qualify them as scientists, but that all began to change in the 16th Century. In this lecture we consider the progression to a philosophy of science, and the underlying principles and assumptions that now guide scientific inquiry.We also examines the nature of scientific knowledge, the methods of acquisition, evolution, and significance over past centuries, and reflect on the value to society.
In the struggle to solve problems, deliver understanding, and reveal the truth about our universe, science had to suffer and survive: ignorance, bigotry, established superstitions, and the ‘diktats’ of religions and politics, and latterly, falling education standards mired by social media. We chart that ‘scientific’ journey emphasising the importance of observation, experimentation, and the search for universal laws. Ultimately, this essentially Aristotelian perspective was challenged and overtaken by the rise of empiricism, which emphasised the importance of sensory experience and the limitations of human knowledge.
Science continues to evolve and provide us with the best truths attainable with our leading edge technologies of observation and experimentation. Today, it stands as the greatest and richest contributor to human knowledge, understanding, progress, and wellbeing. In turn, debates and controversies are ongoing, shaping the field and philosophy which remains essential for understanding the nature of scientific knowledge and the models it creates. But unlike any belief system, the answers and models furnishers by science are not certain and invariant, they tend to be stochastic and incomplete - ‘the best we can do’ at a given time.
Brief history of science from Aristotle, Galileo, Bacon, Descartes to Max Weber, Foucault
Theories of Science: Induction, deduction
Critical thinking of science
Essay about Sci-fI Films
Science Essay
Scientific Theory Essay
Evolution of Science Essay
My Love For Science
Essay about Life Science
My Passion For Science
Environmental Science Essay
Essay on Forensic Science
What Is Earth Science? Essay
"All life is biology. All biology is physiology. All physiology is chemistry. All chemistry is physics. All physics is math." Dr. Stephen Marquardt
Classical physics vs. quantum physic
Drug interactions vs. electromagnetic interactions
If there is science, it must be math
Phi, The Golden Number
God, Creation and Phi
Phi and the human body
Sound, vibration and form
Forms, patterns, geometries, ratios
The Impact of Modern Science and Technology Essay
Science Essay
Essay on History and Philosophy of Science
Reflection On Science And Technology
The Limits of Science Essays
Human Science And Natural Science
Scientific Theory Essay
Ethics in Science Essay
Essay on Science in Society
Essay on Teaching as an Art or a Science
Science As Product And Science
Science And Its Effect On Society Essay
Essay about The Importance of a Science Education
Value of Science Essay
Reflective Essay On Science
The Philosophy of Science Essay
Reflection Paper On Science And Science
Science: Friend or Foe? Essays
Environmental Science Essay
Evolution of Science Essay
Презентация по английскому языку _Научные открытия_.pptdomik011337
Science and motivation, what you want. When I was a kid I used to think that everything in life was possible, but now I dont think so. There are a lot of reasons to give up and to live. We, by ourselves decide our fate what to do and where. Once you start realising you are doing great, you wont be needing any more motivation or so. When I was a kid I had a dream to become an engineer, however I couldn't become one because of our school system. Youll say Im looking for reasons, but no. Our school really ruined everything in me.
Value of Science Essay
Essay on Science in Society
Reflective Essay On Science
Evolution of Science Essay
Science: Friend or Foe? Essays
Essay On Love Science
Essay on Science in Science Fiction
Environmental Science Essay
Science and Religion Essays
Science Is A Boon Or Bane?
Scientific Theory Essay
Scientific Method
Five Step Scientific Method
The Scientific Method Of Social Science Essay
Scientific Method Essay
Scientific Method in Real Life Essay
The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method Essay
Essay On Scientific Method
Scientific Method Essay
Essay Scientific Method
Scientific Method In Psychology
The Importance Of The Scientific Method
Essay On Scientific Method
Scientific Method
Scientific Method
Scientific Method
Essay History of the Scientific Method
Value of Science Essay
The Scientific Method Essay
scientific literacy Essay
Essay on Forensic Science
Computer Science Essay
Science Essay
Scientific Theory Essay
Environmental Science Essay
Science Honor Society Essay
Reflective Essay On Science
My Passion For Science
Essay about Life Science
Keynote for Conscious Life Expo introducing a revolutionary new framework that drives breakthroughs towards thriving in any human system. It's a comprehensive integration of science and wisdom focused on encouraging transformational change.
Presentation given at launch of Wisdompreneurs (Wisdom 2.0) community in San Francisco, Feb 2016 on the unique history of how business evolved into share-holder / casino capitalism from a core Christian / Western idea of the individual Self. Then we look at the changes in Operating System (O.S.) of human evolution and what the networked economy means for hierarchical / market-based corporations. We finish by looking at a potential paradigm shift in business when we place love / unity not separation at the heart of the concept of enterprise / business and look at examples (from the Quakers to B Corps) that show this to be a viable possibility.
How to use commercial innovation techniques - particularly strategic breakthrough innovation - in the public sector; and how to lead innovation in government and non-profits. Includes an introduction to Breakthrough Biodynamics. Taught at SciencePo Feb 2015
The latest neuroscience of the masculine and what it means to be a man. The difference between the brains of men and women, neuropeptides and hormones like dopamine and testosterone, what brings men to life and opportunities for brands to empower men.
A keynote to NHS Leadership Academy on how to lead for impact in complex systems and a networked reality. Includes insight on breakthrough innovation, the science of breakthrough, the neurobiology of breakthrough and our Breakthrough Innovation Engine.
3. TODAY
A FAST FORWARD THROUGH HISTORY, PARADIGMS AND COMPETING
SCHOOLS OF SCIENCE, STARTING OUT WITH ”NATURAL SCIENCE”,
PROVABILITY/REPEATABILITY, MOVING THROUGH VARIOUS SCHOOLS/
PHILOSOPHIES LIKE POSITIVISM, BEHAVIOURISM, ENDING UP WITH
QUANTUM PHYSICS AND CHAOS-THEORY. MOVING THROUGH SOCIAL
SCIENCE, PSYCHOLOGY, ETC.
A CHOICE OF LENSES AND METHODS
13. “The hunt for the origins of modern science has
long been a favourite occupation of historians. They
differ widely about the key moment which saw
science’s birth, tracing it to the philosophers of
Classical Greece, or celebrating the canonical
achievements of 17th-century heroes such as
Galileo, Bacon, Descartes, Boyle and Newton, or
insisting with great plausibility that until at least the
early 19th century, the typical institutions and
techniques of the natural sciences simply didn’t
exist. These different stories depend on widely
divergent versions of what distinguishes the
scientific enterprise, whether method, personnel,
hardware or expertise.”
SIMON SCHAFFER
15. “This year the world is witnessing
the most satisfying phenomenon
that astronomy has ever provided,
an event unique to this day,
changing our doubts into
certainties, and our hypotheses
into demonstrations.”
THE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
16. “Science originated from the
fusion of two old traditions, the
tradition of philosophical thinking
that began in ancient Greece and
the tradition of skilled crafts that
began even earlier and flourished
in medieval Europe. Philosophy
supplied the concepts for science,
and skilled crafts provided the
tools.”
FREEMAN DYSON
28. “Truth is sought for its own sake. And
those who are engaged upon the quest
for anything for its own sake are not
interested in other things. Finding the
truth is difficult, and the road to it is
rough.”
IBN AL-HAYTHAM
30. “There are and can be only two ways of
searching into and discovering truth.
The one flies from the senses and
particulars to the most general axioms,
and from these principles, the truth of
which it takes for settled and
immoveable, proceeds to judgment and
to the discovery of middle axioms. And
this way is now in fashion. The other
derives axioms from the senses and
particulars, rising by a gradual and
unbroken ascent, so that it arrives at the
most general axioms last of all. This is
the true way, but as yet untried.”
FRANCIS BACON
36. “We may regard the present state of the
universe as the effect of its past and the
cause of its future. An intellect which at
any given moment knew all of the forces
that animate nature and the mutual
positions of the beings that compose it,
if this intellect were vast enough to
submit the data to analysis, could
condense into a single formula the
movement of the greatest bodies of the
universe and that of the lightest atom;
for such an intellect nothing could be
uncertain and the future just like the
past would be present before its eyes.”
PIERRE SIMON LA PLACE
50. “In the long history of
humankind (and animal kind,
too) those who learned to
collaborate and improvise
most effectively have
prevailed.”
CHARLES DARWIN
52. “[I]t seems probable that most of
the grand underlying principles have
now been firmly established and
that further advances are to be
sought chiefly in the rigorous
application of these principles to all
the phenomena which come under
our notice…. An eminent physicist
has remarked that the future truths
of physical science are to be looked
for in the sixth place of decimals.”
ALBERT MICHELSON, 1894
62. “He is responsible for the
shameful backwardness of Soviet
biology and of genetics in
particular, for the dissemination
of pseudo-scientific views, for
adventurism, for the degradation
of learning, and for the
defamation, firing, arrest, even
death, of many genuine
scientists”
ANDREI SAKHAROV
78. PROCESS
FIND CURIOUS PHENOMENA / QUESTIONS
OBSERVE A LOT
MAKE UP A THEORY
DESIGN EXPERIMENT TO TEST THEORY
ANALYSE
TELL EVERYONE ABOUT IT
REPEAT (BY OTHERS)
79.
80. “Science is an inherent contradiction —
systematic wonder — applied to the
natural world. In its mundane form, the
methodical instinct prevails and the
result, an orderly procession of papers,
advances the perimeter of knowledge,
step by laborious step… Who knows
how many scientific revolutions have
been missed because their potential
inaugurators disregarded the whimsical,
the incidental, the inconvenient inside
the laboratory?”
THE GENERAL THEORY OF LOVE
81.
82. “Science is not formal logic - it needs
the free play of the mind in as great
a degree as any other creative art. It
is true that this is a gift which can
hardly be taught, but its growth can
be encouraged in those who already
possess it.”
MAX BORN
84. “The most beautiful experience
we can have is the mysterious -
the fundamental emotion which
stands at the cradle of true art
and true science.
EINSTEIN
85. “Science is the most exquisite tool that
we’ve developed for measuring that hard,
physical, material world. Then there is the
world of ideas which is inside our head. I
would say that both of these worlds are
equally real – they’re just real in different
ways.”
ALAN MOORE
102. “Science can (potentially at least)
explain everything because its
ways of trying to understand the
universe by asking questions of it
should not leave any areas off-
limits. The methods of openness,
inquiry, curiosity, theory building,
hypothesis testing and so on can
be adapted and developed to
explore and try to explain
anything.”
SUE BLACKMORE
113. “And God said: Let man have
dominion of the fish of the sea,
and over the fowl of the air.
and over the cattle, and over all
the earth, and over every
creeping thing that creepeth
over the earth.”
GENESIS 1, 26
119. “Which speaking, discoursing
subjects – which subjects of
experience and knowledge – do
you want to ‘diminish’ when you
say: ‘I who conduct this
discourse am conducting a
scientific discourse, and I am a
scientist’?”
FOUCAULT
134. “A new scientific truth does not
triumph by convincing its
opponents and making them see
the light, but rather because its
opponents eventually die, and a
new generation grows up that is
familiar with it.”
MAX PLANCK
145. “For is it not possible that science will create a
monster? Is it not possible that an objective
approach that frowns upon personal connections
between the entities examined will harm people,
turn them into miserable, unfriendly, self-
righteous mechanisms without charm or
humour? "Is it not possible," asks Kierkegaard,
"that my activity as an objective [or critico-
rational] observer of nature will weaken my
strength as a human being?" I suspect the
answer to many of these questions is affirmative
and I believe that a reform of the sciences that
makes them more anarchic and more subjective
is urgently needed.”
PAUL FEYERABEND
147. “It is a calamity that the use of
experiment has severed nature from man,
so that he is content to understand nature
merely through what artificial instruments
reveal and by so doing even restricts her
achievements...Microscopes and
telescopes, in actual fact, confuse man's
innate clarity of mind.”
GOETHE
151. “The fate of our times is
characterized by rationalization and
intellectualization and, above all, by
the 'disenchantment of the world.'
Precisely the ultimate and most
sublime values have retreated from
public life either into the
transcendental realm of mystic life or
into the brotherliness of direct and
personal human relations.”
MAX WEBER, 1918
162. “[Sociology is ] ... the science whose object is
to interpret the meaning of social action and
thereby give a causal explanation of the way
in which the action proceeds and the effects
which it produces. [Never] is the 'meaning'
thought of as somehow objectively 'correct'
or 'true' by some metaphysical criterion. This
is the difference between the empirical
sciences of action, such as sociology and
history, and any kind of a priori discipline,
such as jurisprudence, logic, ethics, or
aesthetics whose aim is to extract from their
subject-matter 'correct' or 'valid' meaning.”
MAX WEBER 1922
166. “Until we invent time-travel and
really get a handle on the multiverse,
science tells us little about history,
for example. Science may be able to
tell us why we like music, why
certain types of sound appeal more
than others, but not why Bach is the
best.”
A REALIST PHILOSOPHY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE:
EXPLANATION AND UNDERSTANDING
173. “The emancipation of human
beings from the circumstances
that enslave them.”
HORKHEIMER
174. “The means of communication, the
irresistible output of the
entertainment and information
industry carry with them prescribed
attitudes and habits, certain
intellectual and emotional reactions
which bind the consumers to the
producers and, through the latter to
the whole social system. The products
indoctrinate and manipulate; they
promote a false consciousness which
is immune against its falsehood...Thus
emerges a pattern of one-dimensional
thought and behavior.”
HERBERT MARCUSE
179. “The positivist thesis of unified
science, which assimilates all the
sciences to a natural-scientific model,
fails because of the intimate
relationship between the social
sciences and history, and the fact that
they are based on a situation-specific
understanding of meaning that can be
explicated only hermeneutically ...
access to a symbolically prestructured
reality cannot be gained by
observation alone.”
JURGEN HABERMAS
180. “No pedagogy which is truly
liberating can remain distant
from the oppressed by treating
them as unfortunates and by
presenting for their emulation
models from among the
oppressors. The oppressed must
be their own example in the
struggle for their redemption.”
PAULO FREIRE 1970
183. “'It is imperative that we give up the
idea of ultimate sources of
knowledge, and admit that all
knowledge is human; that it is mixed
with our errors, our prejudices, our
dreams, and our hopes; that all we
can do is to grope for truth even
though it is beyond our reach. There
is no authority beyond the reach of
criticism.”
KARL POPPER
185. “What man needs is not just the
persistent posing of ultimate
questions, but the sense of what is
feasible, what is possible, what is
correct, here and now. The
philosopher, of all people, must, I
think, be aware of the tension
between what he claims to achieve
and the reality in which he finds
himself.”
HANS-GEORG GADAMER
187. “In Aristotle’s words phronesis is a
‘true state, reasoned, and capable of
action with regard to things that are
good or bad for man.’ Phronesis goes
beyond both analytical, scientific
knowledge (episteme) and technical
knowledge or know-how (techne)
and involves judgments and decisions
made in the manner of a virtuoso
social and political actor.”
BENT FLYVBJERG
188. PHRONESIS
WHERE ARE WE GOING?
IS THIS DESIRABLE?
WHO GAINS AND WHO LOSES, AND BY
WHICH MECHANISMS OF POWER?
WHAT, IF ANYTHING, SHOULD WE DO
ABOUT IT?
191. INTENTION KNOWLEDGE TERMS LENSES
REDUCTIONISM
EXPLANATION OF NATURALISM / REALISM EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
KNOW ‘TRUTH’
WHAT IS PROOF INDUCTION /
DEDUCTION
PREDICT / CONTROL CORROBORATION OF EVIDENCE BASE
INSTRUMENTALISM
NATURE WHAT WORKS RCTS
SEMIOTICS
CONTEXT
APPRECIATE / UNDERSTANDING OF
HERMENEUTICS QUAL / QUANT
EMPATHISE HOW THINGS ARE
PO
DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
DECONSTRUCTION
CRITICISM OF WHY STRUCTURALISM
DISEMPOWER ‘ARCHEOLOGY’
THINGS ARE POST MODERNISM
CRITICAL THEORY
SYSTEMS / CYNEFIN
INSIGHT INTO HOW TO ACTION RESEARCH
IMPROVE EMANCIPATION
CHANGE THINGS CRITICAL
CONSCIOUSNESS
195. “We still have not seen much
movement on... the deep systemic
issues that cause the current cluster of
crisis symptoms to be reproduced time
and again. I believe that the most
important root issue of the current
crisis is our thinking: how we
collectively think.”
C OTTO SCHARMER
196. HOW WE THINK
LINEAR, REDUCTIONIST, MECHANISTIC
SEPARATE FROM NATURE / EACH OTHER
NATURE / PEOPLE THERE TO BE USED
EXIST TO COMPETE, CONSUME, PRODUCE
200. “There can be no scientific
study of society, either in its
conditions or its movements, if
it is separated into portions,
and its divisions are studied
apart.”
AUGUSTE COMTE
201. SYSTEMS
HAVE IDENTITIES WHICH RESIST CHANGE
RESPOND TO INTERVENTIONS
ATTEMPT TO SHAPE PEOPLE / PLACES
COMPLEX BEHAVIOUR
LEARN
SYMBOLIC EXCHANGES
211. “Can we talk about the wholeness of life?
Can one be aware of that wholeness if the
mind is fragmented? You can't be aware
of the whole if you are only looking
through a small hole.”
J KRISHNAMURTI
220. “No effect arises without cause, yet no
effect is predetermined, for its causes
are multiple and mutually affecting.
Hence there can be novelty as well as
order.”
JOANNA MACY
226. “Something hit me very hard once,
thinking about what one little man
could do. Think of the Queen Mary - the
whole ship goes by and then comes the
rudder. And there's a tiny thing at the
edge of the rudder called a trim tab.”
BUCKMINSTER FULLER
248. “You have to be a certain kind of complex system to
adapt, and you have to be a certain kind of complex
system to coevolve with other complex systems. We
have to understand what it means for complex
systems to come to know one another — in the
sense that when complex systems coevolve, each
sets the conditions of success for the others. I
suspect that there are emergent laws about how
such complex systems work, so that, in a global,
Gaia- like way, complex coevolving systems
mutually get themselves to the edge of chaos,
where they're poised in a balanced state. It's a very
pretty idea. It may be right, too.”
STUART KAUFMANN
255. “If biologists have ignored self-organization, it is not
because self-ordering is not pervasive and profound. It
is because we biologists have yet to understand how to
think about systems governed simultaneously by two
sources of order, Yet who seeing the snowflake, who
seeing simple lipid molecules cast adrift in water
forming themselves into cell-like hollow lipid vesicles,
who seeing the potential for the crystallization of life in
swarms of reacting molecules, who seeing the stunning
order for free in networks linking tens upon tens of
thousands of variables, can fail to entertain a central
thought: if ever we are to attain a final theory in
biology, we will surely, surely have to understand the
commingling of self-organization and selection. We will
have to see that we are the natural expressions of a
deeper order. Ultimately, we will discover in our creation
myth that we are expected after all.”
STUART KAUFFMAN
277. “Thinking more deeply about
institutions and complexity raises major
dilemmas for development
interventions. On the one hand, tackling
poverty, achieving social justice and
protecting the environment clearly
require institutional transformation. On
the other, institutions cannot be
effectively changed in a neatly planned,
top-down manner.”
JIM WOODHILL
278. “Don’t disturb complicated systems
that have been around for a very long
time. We don’t understand their logic…
Leave it the way we found it, regardless
of scientific ‘evidence’.”
N. NICHOLAS TALEB
279. REMEMBER
DYNAMIC, RICH INTERACTIONS
DIFFERENT PEOPLE, DIFFERENT LEVELS
FEEDBACK LOOPS
NON-LINEAR, UNPREDICTABLE
EMERGENT CHARACTERISTICS
SMALL CHANGES CAN HAVE LARGE IMPACTS
HISTORY CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE
283. “Often the only way to improve a
complex system is to probe its limits by
forcing it to fail in various ways.”
KEVIN KELLY
284. The Cynefin Model
Complex Complicated
Known causes and effects
Understandable root causes
Use good practice
Use emergent practice
Focus on co-operation
(harness principles)
Focus on collaboration
Sense. Analyze. Respond
Sense. Explore. Respond
Disorder
Chaotic Simple
Predictable causes and effects
Unknowable causes / effects
Use best-practice
Use new practice
Focus on co-ordination
Focus on co-creation
Explore. Sense. Respond Sense. Categorize. Respond
285. “Part of reinventing the sacred is to heal...injuries that
we hardly know we suffer. If we are members of a
universe in which emergence and ceaseless creativity
abound, if we take that creativity as a sense of God we
can share, the resulting sense of the sacredness of all of
life and the planet can help orient our lives beyond the
consumerism and commodification the industrialized
world now lives, heal the split between reason and faith,
heal the split between science and the humanities, heal
the want of spirituality, heal the wound derived from
the false reductionist belief that we live in a world of
fact without values, and help us jointly build a global
ethic. These are what is at stake in finding a new
scientific worldview that enables us to reinvent the
sacred.”
STUART KAUFFMAN