Rubrics are scoring methods used to describe a student's performance on various criteria from excellent to poor. They are used to assess performances such as processes, products, oral communication, and written work. When creating rubrics, teachers should define appropriate criteria that are definable, observable, distinct from each other, and able to support descriptions along a continuum of quality. The descriptions of performance levels should be clear, distinguish among levels, and center the target performance level. Rubrics help provide students with clear guidelines to improve their work.
This document provides guidance on designing effective rubrics for assessing student performance. It discusses that rubrics should have specific indicators for clearly defined criteria. Rubrics establish performance levels on a scale and describe the characteristics of each level. Benefits of rubrics include providing clear assessment standards for students and feedback. When designing rubrics, the document recommends limiting criteria to key areas, using concrete language, and involving students.
This document provides guidance on designing effective rubrics for assessing student performance. It defines what a rubric is and compares rubrics to checklists. Rubrics can be holistic, assessing the overall quality of work, or analytic, assessing various criteria separately. The document recommends determining clear criteria and descriptors, involving students, limiting criteria to key aspects, using concrete language and examples, and pilot testing rubrics. Rubrics should be task-specific and altered based on experience to improve clarity and usefulness for students.
This document discusses different types of objective tests that can be used to assess student learning, including selection, arrangement, matching, multiple choice, alternate response, key list, interpretative exercises, and essay tests. It provides examples for each type and describes their characteristics. The types vary in their structure and format, from arranging terms in order, to matching items, to answering multiple choice or true/false questions. The document emphasizes that teachers should choose the test type based on the learning outcomes being assessed and time available.
Scoring rubrics are descriptive schemes developed by teachers or evaluators to guide analysis of student work. They describe levels of quality expected for a task and can be used to evaluate a variety of projects and activities. When developing a rubric, teachers identify the key criteria for assessment, such as quality, creativity, accuracy, and aesthetics. Rubrics support evaluation by examining the extent criteria are met and provide feedback to help students improve. Rubrics are an appropriate technique for grading essays and can also be used to evaluate group activities, projects, and presentations.
Teachers assess learners for several key reasons: to monitor and aid learners' progress, provide learners with evidence of their progress to boost motivation, monitor their own performance to plan future work, and provide information to parents, colleagues, and school authorities. Assessment serves placement, formative, diagnostic, and summative roles: placement determines students' starting points, formative monitors progress during instruction, diagnostic identifies weaknesses, and summative determines mastery at the end. Assessment can be for learning during instruction, of learning to measure achievement, or as learning to further student self-assessment.
This document discusses different grading systems used in education. It describes norm-referenced and criterion-referenced grading systems. A norm-referenced system evaluates students relative to other students' performance, while a criterion-referenced system evaluates students based on an absolute standard or criteria. The document also provides examples of reporting grades using percentages, numbers, letters, and descriptions for tertiary education. It outlines the grading system used in Philippine public elementary and secondary schools according to DepEd Order 33, including features such as minimum performance standards, assessment categories, and promotion policies.
This document provides an overview of rubrics, including their definition, purpose, advantages, and types. A rubric is defined as a set of criteria and performance levels used to evaluate student work. The main purposes of rubrics are to communicate expectations to students and assess completed work. Advantages include being objective, providing feedback, and clarifying expectations. There are two main types of rubrics: holistic rubrics that provide one overall score, and analytic rubrics that score each criterion separately. The document provides examples of both types of rubrics and discusses how to create and use rubrics effectively.
Performance-based tests assess what students know and are able to do by having them complete tasks or solve problems. Rubrics are used to score performance-based tests by listing the criteria for the task and describing varying levels of quality. Exemplars are examples that show the characteristics of high-quality work. Performance tasks require students to apply their knowledge and skills to complete an activity. Procedures for performance-based tests involve using rubrics, exemplars, and having students complete performance tasks.
This document provides guidance on designing effective rubrics for assessing student performance. It discusses that rubrics should have specific indicators for clearly defined criteria. Rubrics establish performance levels on a scale and describe the characteristics of each level. Benefits of rubrics include providing clear assessment standards for students and feedback. When designing rubrics, the document recommends limiting criteria to key areas, using concrete language, and involving students.
This document provides guidance on designing effective rubrics for assessing student performance. It defines what a rubric is and compares rubrics to checklists. Rubrics can be holistic, assessing the overall quality of work, or analytic, assessing various criteria separately. The document recommends determining clear criteria and descriptors, involving students, limiting criteria to key aspects, using concrete language and examples, and pilot testing rubrics. Rubrics should be task-specific and altered based on experience to improve clarity and usefulness for students.
This document discusses different types of objective tests that can be used to assess student learning, including selection, arrangement, matching, multiple choice, alternate response, key list, interpretative exercises, and essay tests. It provides examples for each type and describes their characteristics. The types vary in their structure and format, from arranging terms in order, to matching items, to answering multiple choice or true/false questions. The document emphasizes that teachers should choose the test type based on the learning outcomes being assessed and time available.
Scoring rubrics are descriptive schemes developed by teachers or evaluators to guide analysis of student work. They describe levels of quality expected for a task and can be used to evaluate a variety of projects and activities. When developing a rubric, teachers identify the key criteria for assessment, such as quality, creativity, accuracy, and aesthetics. Rubrics support evaluation by examining the extent criteria are met and provide feedback to help students improve. Rubrics are an appropriate technique for grading essays and can also be used to evaluate group activities, projects, and presentations.
Teachers assess learners for several key reasons: to monitor and aid learners' progress, provide learners with evidence of their progress to boost motivation, monitor their own performance to plan future work, and provide information to parents, colleagues, and school authorities. Assessment serves placement, formative, diagnostic, and summative roles: placement determines students' starting points, formative monitors progress during instruction, diagnostic identifies weaknesses, and summative determines mastery at the end. Assessment can be for learning during instruction, of learning to measure achievement, or as learning to further student self-assessment.
This document discusses different grading systems used in education. It describes norm-referenced and criterion-referenced grading systems. A norm-referenced system evaluates students relative to other students' performance, while a criterion-referenced system evaluates students based on an absolute standard or criteria. The document also provides examples of reporting grades using percentages, numbers, letters, and descriptions for tertiary education. It outlines the grading system used in Philippine public elementary and secondary schools according to DepEd Order 33, including features such as minimum performance standards, assessment categories, and promotion policies.
This document provides an overview of rubrics, including their definition, purpose, advantages, and types. A rubric is defined as a set of criteria and performance levels used to evaluate student work. The main purposes of rubrics are to communicate expectations to students and assess completed work. Advantages include being objective, providing feedback, and clarifying expectations. There are two main types of rubrics: holistic rubrics that provide one overall score, and analytic rubrics that score each criterion separately. The document provides examples of both types of rubrics and discusses how to create and use rubrics effectively.
Performance-based tests assess what students know and are able to do by having them complete tasks or solve problems. Rubrics are used to score performance-based tests by listing the criteria for the task and describing varying levels of quality. Exemplars are examples that show the characteristics of high-quality work. Performance tasks require students to apply their knowledge and skills to complete an activity. Procedures for performance-based tests involve using rubrics, exemplars, and having students complete performance tasks.
Is it possible to explain why the student outputs is as they are through an assessment of the processes which they did in order to arrive at the final product?
YES, through Process oriented, performance-based assessment
Portfolios are purposeful collections of student work that exhibit their progress and achievement. They include student participation in selecting contents and self-reflection. Using portfolios for assessment matches real teaching and learning, has clear goals, and gives a profile of learner abilities and growth over time. It assesses a variety of skills and develops independent, active learners. Effective portfolios contain essential elements like a cover letter, table of contents, entries with dates and reflections, and criteria for assessing contents. Teachers guide students through the process, which involves identifying goals, introducing the concept, specifying content, and providing presentation guidelines. Students are supported through conferences and encouraged to engage in self-reflection and assessment.
This document discusses performance assessment as a way to measure students' achievements, work habits, behavior, and attitudes. It defines performance assessment as the direct observation and rating of a student's actual performance on a task according to pre-established criteria. Performance tests require students to demonstrate skills by performing or producing something, rather than just answering questions. They allow teachers to observe outcomes like work habits that standard tests may miss. The document provides examples of performance tests and discusses how to design them, including developing rubrics with explicit criteria and performance levels to assess students' mastery. It notes advantages of rubrics like providing a clear profile of student performance and increasing the validity, reliability, and fairness of scoring.
1. The document discusses assessing affective learning outcomes, which relate to non-cognitive variables like attitudes, interests, and values.
2. It defines key affective concepts like the affective domain, levels of affective learning, and methods of assessing affective outcomes.
3. The importance of assessing the affective domain is explained, such as its ability to predict future behavior and help teachers teach more effectively.
Traditionally examination was the purpose of learning. However, our conception of learning is changing and it is being front ended. Now assessment is also being treated as learning. This presentation deals with assessment, feedback and assurance of learning.
classroom observation and type of observersSiwar Bdioui
Classroom observation involves a person sitting in on class sessions to record both the teacher's practices and student actions. The purposes of observation include providing feedback to teachers and training future teachers. Key aspects to observe include the instructor's words and actions, student engagement, and the interaction between teachers and students. There are different types of observers, including participant observers who interact closely in the classroom, non-participant observers who do not participate but have a planned structured approach, and structured versus non-structured approaches to recording observations.
A portfolio is a collection of a student's work that is selected and organized to show student learning progress over time or showcase a student's best work. A portfolio can contain classwork, assessments, reflections, and other materials. It provides advantages as an assessment tool by allowing students to develop reflective skills and giving teachers documentation of student learning. However, portfolios also have disadvantages such as being time-consuming to create and store. There are different types of portfolios, including working, documentary, and showcase portfolios, that serve different purposes and contain various materials. Effective portfolio assessment involves collaboration between teachers, students, and parents using clear criteria.
This document discusses different types of assessment and evaluation tools used in education. It describes diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments and their purposes. Diagnostic assessments identify student strengths and weaknesses at the start of instruction. Formative assessments evaluate student learning throughout instruction to help students improve. Summative assessments make judgments about student achievement at the end of a learning period. The document also outlines specific tools like observations, checklists, interviews, and projects that can be used for assessment and evaluation.
Different types of Test
Why do We give tests?
Kinds of tests
Other categories of tests
Two Types of Test (Questions)
Subjective Test Samples
Essay
Types of Essay Items
Matching type
Completion Type
Process oriented performance-based assessmentrenarch
Performance assessment involves observing and judging a student's demonstration of skills or competencies through tasks like creating a product, responding to a prompt, or giving a presentation. It emphasizes a student's ability to apply their knowledge and skills to produce their own work. Performance assessments typically require sustained effort over multiple days and involve explaining, justifying, and defending ideas. They rely on trained evaluators to score student work using pre-specified criteria and standards. While performance assessments integrate assessment with learning and provide formative feedback, they can be difficult to score reliably and require significant time from teachers and students.
(1) The document discusses assessment competencies for teachers, including choosing appropriate assessment methods, administering and interpreting various assessments, using results for instructional decisions, developing valid grading procedures, and communicating results.
(2) It also outlines several standards for teachers related to choosing, developing, interpreting and using assessment results for decision making, grading, and communicating.
(3) The document discusses the concepts of assessment literacy and alternative forms of assessment like performance and portfolio assessments. It provides definitions and characteristics of these approaches.
The document discusses the important elements of rubrics for assessing student learning, which include criteria, levels of performance, and descriptors. Criteria are the traits or dimensions used to judge student responses. Levels of performance establish a scale to rate each criterion. Descriptors spell out the expected performance at each level for each criterion. Guidelines for developing rubrics include identifying desired qualities, choosing an analytical or holistic rubric type, and defining lowest performance standards. Tips include collaborating with colleagues, gathering sample rubrics, keeping rubrics short and simple, focusing on different skills per item, and student learning development.
The document provides information about effective testing in 3 main areas:
1. It defines what a test is and discusses the different uses of tests for various stakeholders like teachers, students, parents and administrators.
2. It describes the different types of tests categorized by mode of response, administration, scoring, and what is being measured.
3. It outlines the key steps in effective test preparation for both teachers in constructing good tests and students in preparing for exams. This includes considering validity, reliability, appropriateness and other factors.
Criterion-referenced assessment measures student performance against a fixed set of learning standards to determine if students have mastered specific skills or knowledge. It has pros like testing students only on defined goals and allowing teachers to reteach unmastered standards, but can be difficult to set standards boundaries. Criterion-referenced assessment differs from norm-referenced assessment in that the former provides information on an individual's performance on objectives, while the latter compares performance to others in a known group.
Rubrics for Educational Assessment.pptxshaziazamir1
Rubric is "a scoring guide used to evaluate the quality of students' constructed responses". Put simply, it is a set of criteria for grading assignments.
Performance-based assessment involves students demonstrating their knowledge and skills through tasks and projects that are meaningful. It provides teachers insight into how students understand and apply their learning. There are various types of performance-based assessment, including individual/group projects, portfolios, performances, and journals. Projects require creativity, critical thinking and collaboration. Portfolios document learning over time through curated work samples. Performances allow students to demonstrate skills through acts like routines. Journals record reflections. Advantages include promoting collaboration, student-centered learning, and knowledge retention. Disadvantages can include potential cheating and high time/cost requirements.
This presentation clarifies what formative assessment is. The purpose and intention of formative assessment on improving student learning is emphasized. The different techniques on conducting formative assessment inside the classroom are provided.
This document discusses formative and summative assessment. Formative assessment is used to monitor student progress and modify instruction, while summative assessment evaluates learning at the end of a period. The goals of formative assessment are to establish student strengths and weaknesses and improve teaching and learning. Summative assessment goals include providing grades and measuring growth against standards. Both types of assessment should be used for a balanced system to fully understand student achievement.
This document provides biographical information about Karen G. Johnson, including her education, publications, presentations, and roles at Shippensburg University. It lists her educational background, including degrees from the University of Southern Mississippi, Pennsylvania State University, and Liberty University. It also extensively lists her publications such as book chapters, journal articles, and conference presentations. The document establishes Karen G. Johnson as an expert in the field of writing with a focus on tutoring, basic writing, and assessment.
Is it possible to explain why the student outputs is as they are through an assessment of the processes which they did in order to arrive at the final product?
YES, through Process oriented, performance-based assessment
Portfolios are purposeful collections of student work that exhibit their progress and achievement. They include student participation in selecting contents and self-reflection. Using portfolios for assessment matches real teaching and learning, has clear goals, and gives a profile of learner abilities and growth over time. It assesses a variety of skills and develops independent, active learners. Effective portfolios contain essential elements like a cover letter, table of contents, entries with dates and reflections, and criteria for assessing contents. Teachers guide students through the process, which involves identifying goals, introducing the concept, specifying content, and providing presentation guidelines. Students are supported through conferences and encouraged to engage in self-reflection and assessment.
This document discusses performance assessment as a way to measure students' achievements, work habits, behavior, and attitudes. It defines performance assessment as the direct observation and rating of a student's actual performance on a task according to pre-established criteria. Performance tests require students to demonstrate skills by performing or producing something, rather than just answering questions. They allow teachers to observe outcomes like work habits that standard tests may miss. The document provides examples of performance tests and discusses how to design them, including developing rubrics with explicit criteria and performance levels to assess students' mastery. It notes advantages of rubrics like providing a clear profile of student performance and increasing the validity, reliability, and fairness of scoring.
1. The document discusses assessing affective learning outcomes, which relate to non-cognitive variables like attitudes, interests, and values.
2. It defines key affective concepts like the affective domain, levels of affective learning, and methods of assessing affective outcomes.
3. The importance of assessing the affective domain is explained, such as its ability to predict future behavior and help teachers teach more effectively.
Traditionally examination was the purpose of learning. However, our conception of learning is changing and it is being front ended. Now assessment is also being treated as learning. This presentation deals with assessment, feedback and assurance of learning.
classroom observation and type of observersSiwar Bdioui
Classroom observation involves a person sitting in on class sessions to record both the teacher's practices and student actions. The purposes of observation include providing feedback to teachers and training future teachers. Key aspects to observe include the instructor's words and actions, student engagement, and the interaction between teachers and students. There are different types of observers, including participant observers who interact closely in the classroom, non-participant observers who do not participate but have a planned structured approach, and structured versus non-structured approaches to recording observations.
A portfolio is a collection of a student's work that is selected and organized to show student learning progress over time or showcase a student's best work. A portfolio can contain classwork, assessments, reflections, and other materials. It provides advantages as an assessment tool by allowing students to develop reflective skills and giving teachers documentation of student learning. However, portfolios also have disadvantages such as being time-consuming to create and store. There are different types of portfolios, including working, documentary, and showcase portfolios, that serve different purposes and contain various materials. Effective portfolio assessment involves collaboration between teachers, students, and parents using clear criteria.
This document discusses different types of assessment and evaluation tools used in education. It describes diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments and their purposes. Diagnostic assessments identify student strengths and weaknesses at the start of instruction. Formative assessments evaluate student learning throughout instruction to help students improve. Summative assessments make judgments about student achievement at the end of a learning period. The document also outlines specific tools like observations, checklists, interviews, and projects that can be used for assessment and evaluation.
Different types of Test
Why do We give tests?
Kinds of tests
Other categories of tests
Two Types of Test (Questions)
Subjective Test Samples
Essay
Types of Essay Items
Matching type
Completion Type
Process oriented performance-based assessmentrenarch
Performance assessment involves observing and judging a student's demonstration of skills or competencies through tasks like creating a product, responding to a prompt, or giving a presentation. It emphasizes a student's ability to apply their knowledge and skills to produce their own work. Performance assessments typically require sustained effort over multiple days and involve explaining, justifying, and defending ideas. They rely on trained evaluators to score student work using pre-specified criteria and standards. While performance assessments integrate assessment with learning and provide formative feedback, they can be difficult to score reliably and require significant time from teachers and students.
(1) The document discusses assessment competencies for teachers, including choosing appropriate assessment methods, administering and interpreting various assessments, using results for instructional decisions, developing valid grading procedures, and communicating results.
(2) It also outlines several standards for teachers related to choosing, developing, interpreting and using assessment results for decision making, grading, and communicating.
(3) The document discusses the concepts of assessment literacy and alternative forms of assessment like performance and portfolio assessments. It provides definitions and characteristics of these approaches.
The document discusses the important elements of rubrics for assessing student learning, which include criteria, levels of performance, and descriptors. Criteria are the traits or dimensions used to judge student responses. Levels of performance establish a scale to rate each criterion. Descriptors spell out the expected performance at each level for each criterion. Guidelines for developing rubrics include identifying desired qualities, choosing an analytical or holistic rubric type, and defining lowest performance standards. Tips include collaborating with colleagues, gathering sample rubrics, keeping rubrics short and simple, focusing on different skills per item, and student learning development.
The document provides information about effective testing in 3 main areas:
1. It defines what a test is and discusses the different uses of tests for various stakeholders like teachers, students, parents and administrators.
2. It describes the different types of tests categorized by mode of response, administration, scoring, and what is being measured.
3. It outlines the key steps in effective test preparation for both teachers in constructing good tests and students in preparing for exams. This includes considering validity, reliability, appropriateness and other factors.
Criterion-referenced assessment measures student performance against a fixed set of learning standards to determine if students have mastered specific skills or knowledge. It has pros like testing students only on defined goals and allowing teachers to reteach unmastered standards, but can be difficult to set standards boundaries. Criterion-referenced assessment differs from norm-referenced assessment in that the former provides information on an individual's performance on objectives, while the latter compares performance to others in a known group.
Rubrics for Educational Assessment.pptxshaziazamir1
Rubric is "a scoring guide used to evaluate the quality of students' constructed responses". Put simply, it is a set of criteria for grading assignments.
Performance-based assessment involves students demonstrating their knowledge and skills through tasks and projects that are meaningful. It provides teachers insight into how students understand and apply their learning. There are various types of performance-based assessment, including individual/group projects, portfolios, performances, and journals. Projects require creativity, critical thinking and collaboration. Portfolios document learning over time through curated work samples. Performances allow students to demonstrate skills through acts like routines. Journals record reflections. Advantages include promoting collaboration, student-centered learning, and knowledge retention. Disadvantages can include potential cheating and high time/cost requirements.
This presentation clarifies what formative assessment is. The purpose and intention of formative assessment on improving student learning is emphasized. The different techniques on conducting formative assessment inside the classroom are provided.
This document discusses formative and summative assessment. Formative assessment is used to monitor student progress and modify instruction, while summative assessment evaluates learning at the end of a period. The goals of formative assessment are to establish student strengths and weaknesses and improve teaching and learning. Summative assessment goals include providing grades and measuring growth against standards. Both types of assessment should be used for a balanced system to fully understand student achievement.
This document provides biographical information about Karen G. Johnson, including her education, publications, presentations, and roles at Shippensburg University. It lists her educational background, including degrees from the University of Southern Mississippi, Pennsylvania State University, and Liberty University. It also extensively lists her publications such as book chapters, journal articles, and conference presentations. The document establishes Karen G. Johnson as an expert in the field of writing with a focus on tutoring, basic writing, and assessment.
Developing Essential (Power) Standards With RbtJerrie Brown
The document discusses the development of essential standards in North Carolina using Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. It outlines criteria for identifying priority standards and describes how standards can be written as objectives using verbs to specify cognitive processes. Tables show how standards have been organized based on knowledge dimensions and cognitive process levels to ensure emphasis on higher-order thinking.
The document discusses the origins and definitions of the term "rubric" in education. Originally, a rubric referred to decorative text or instructions written in red ink on medieval documents. In modern education, a rubric has come to refer to an assessment tool such as a scoring guide or set of criteria used to evaluate student performance or assign grades. The term was first used in this new educational sense in the mid-1990s. Rubrics can help make scoring more objective and consistent, provide students with clear expectations, and offer feedback to improve instruction.
A Comparison Of The Performance Of Analytic Vs. Holistic Scoring Rubrics To A...Richard Hogue
This document compares the performance of holistic and analytic scoring rubrics for assessing L2 (second language) writing ability. It discusses how holistic rubrics provide a single overall score while analytic rubrics score different components of writing separately. The study investigated which type of rubric better separated examinees by writing proficiency level using Rasch analysis of writing samples from an English placement exam. Results suggested the analytic rubric may be better for diagnostic and placement purposes as it distinguished examinees across a wider range of writing abilities, while the holistic rubric categories were underused.
Qualities of a Well-Written Peer Review ReportReggie Cruz
This document summarizes a seminar on writing peer-reviewed journal articles. It defines peer review as experts in a field commenting on others' work to ensure quality. Key qualities of a good peer review report are identified, including using objective standards, being positive and motivating, and going beyond standards to help authors improve. A developmental approach is advocated to avoid confrontation and encourage open dialogue between reviewers and authors. The presenter is introduced as an experienced educator and researcher who has published works and presented on related topics.
The document provides information about culturally responsive teaching (CRT). It begins by stating the workshop objectives, which are to understand how students differ by culture/race and class, define and describe CRT and how it respects student differences, and utilize strategies to increase achievement for subgroups. It then discusses why CRT is important and what CRT is and is not. Several key strategies for CRT are outlined, including establishing inclusion norms, developing positive attitudes, enhancing meaning, and engendering competence. The document concludes by discussing applying an action research process to address underperformance by minority males in a teacher's class.
This annotated bibliography summarizes research on student learning outcomes and language proficiency assessment. It describes several master's theses and reports that studied using discrete-point tests and rubrics to assess language placement and proficiency. It also reviews literature on how to provide effective feedback to students, the options for language assessment, and frameworks for understanding raters' processes in evaluating writing. The bibliography examines issues around evaluating programs and establishing common standards across institutions.
The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of "rubric" in language testing and assessment and to highlight the parts of a rubric through various dimensions. Moreover, it sets forth in creating awareness of the effective use of rubrics in measuring multiple dimensions of students' learning and in reflecting robustness of this critical assessment process.
Dynamic assessment of academic writing: macro-Theme and hyper-ThemePrithvi Shrestha
This document discusses a study that explored using dynamic assessment to enhance students' academic writing development. Dynamic assessment is based on Vygotsky's sociocultural theory and involves assessing students within mediated learning interactions. The study analyzed students' writing assignments using systemic functional linguistics to examine macro-themes and hyper-themes. The findings showed that the dynamic assessment approach helped both students improve these elements of their writing and perceive the process more positively compared to traditional assessment.
A Study Of Discourse Markers In EFL Students On Argumentative TextStacy Taylor
This document summarizes a study on the use of discourse markers (DMs) in argumentative writing by English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. It finds that there are 30 types of DMs used across different text types. The DMs serve four main functions: contrastive markers, inferential markers, elaborative markers, and additional subclasses markers. Examples from student writing are provided to illustrate the types and functions of DMs. The study aims to help teachers understand students' use of DMs to improve writing instruction and the development of coherence and cohesion in student writing.
This document discusses essay tests as an assessment method. It defines essay tests as requiring students to compose responses in paragraphs about a given subject. Essay tests can measure complex learning outcomes like analysis, synthesis and evaluation. There are two types: restricted response requires students to focus on specific details, while extended response allows freedom in content and length. Scoring essay tests reliably can be challenging due to subjectivity, but setting clear criteria and removing identifying information can help. The document outlines best practices for creating and grading essay test questions.
1-2 pages Required ReadingsRavitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2.docxteresehearn
1-2 pages
Required Readings
Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2016). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Epilogue, “Revisiting Critically, Reflexivity, Collaboration, and Rigor” (pp. 383–392)
Chapter 10, “Crafting Qualitative Research Proposals” (pp. 299–342)
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Chapter 14, “Personal Reflections on Responsive Interviewing” (pp. 234–242)
Required Media
Bald, L. (2016). A qualitative doctoral candidate experience [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Lewis, C. (2016). A qualitative doctoral candidate experience [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review the readings from the Ravitch and Carl and Rubin and Rubin and consider reflecting on your experiences in qualitative research throughout this course.
Review the media programs related to The Qualitative Dissertation Experience: A Doctoral Candidate Experience and consider the experience of other doctoral candidates through this qualitative research process.
Explain what social change means to you as a Walden doctoral candidate. What experiences from the course most influenced your understanding?
Explain what in qualitative research you would like to know more about as a result of taking this course.
Reflect on your problem statement and the next steps for developing a research topic for your dissertation or doctoral study. Include an explanation of whether you would choose a qualitative approach, why or why not.
PLEASE USE REQUIRED READINGS AND CITATIONS. THANK YOU
.
The document contains daily lesson logs for a Practical Research 2 class over several weeks. It includes topics covered each day, learning competencies and objectives, learning resources, and methods of instruction and assessment. Some of the topics covered include course introduction, identifying inquiry and stating problems, learning from others/reviewing literature, and understanding data collection. Learning activities included group work, presentations, analyses, and workshops. Assessments included outputs, recitation, and worksheets. The logs were prepared and checked by the teacher and school administrators.
This document discusses rubric development. It defines rubrics and their purposes, which include providing clear expectations and feedback to students. Good rubrics are well-defined using specific language, context-specific, ordered, and related to learning standards. There are two main types of rubrics: analytic rubrics evaluate each criterion separately while holistic rubrics provide an overall score. The document outlines strategies for creating rubrics such as reflecting on learning objectives and outcomes, listing criteria, and applying a rubric format. Rubrics should be shared with and explained to students in advance.
The document discusses programs run by the Philippines Department of Health (DOH) related to family planning. It describes the DOH's Family Health Office, which operates health programs to improve family health. These include the National Safe Motherhood Program, Family Planning Program, Child Health Program, and others. It provides details on objectives, components, and services offered by the National Safe Motherhood Program and National Family Planning Program, which aim to improve maternal and child health and allow individuals to plan family size.
ORTHOPEDIC NURSING: CARE OF THE CLIENT WITH MUSCULO-SKELETAL DISORDERRommel Luis III Israel
The document discusses orthopedic nursing and provides information on musculoskeletal anatomy and physiology. It describes the three types of muscles, tendons, ligaments, bones, joints, and other musculoskeletal structures. It then covers assessment of the musculoskeletal system through history, physical examination including gait, posture, and range of motion. Common laboratory procedures used to assess the musculoskeletal system are also outlined such as bone marrow aspiration, arthroscopy, bone scan, and DXA scan. The nursing management of common musculoskeletal problems like pain, impaired mobility, and self-care deficits are summarized. Modalities used including traction and casting are described. Finally, common musculoskeletal conditions like osteoporosis are briefly discussed.
This document discusses common laboratory procedures used to evaluate alterations in the endocrine system. It describes assays that measure hormone levels in the blood, including stimulation and suppression tests. It provides examples of how thyroid hormone levels can indicate hypo- or hyperthyroidism. Tests are also described for radioactive iodine uptake, thyroid scans, basal metabolic rate, fasting blood glucose, oral glucose tolerance, and glycosylated hemoglobin A1C. The purpose, procedure, and interpretation of results are covered for each test.
This document provides information about end of life care. It discusses key aspects of end of life care including physical and psychological manifestations at the end of life, the goals of end of life care which are to provide comfort, improve quality of remaining life, and ensure a dignified death. It also discusses variables that can affect end of life care like cultural and spiritual needs as well as nursing management of end of life care.
This document discusses cirrhosis of the liver, liver cancer, and hepatitis. It provides information on the causes of cirrhosis including alcohol, viral hepatitis, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Symptoms of cirrhosis include jaundice, fatigue, bruising, and abdominal swelling. The complications of cirrhosis are also examined, such as bleeding from varices and hepatic encephalopathy. Treatment focuses on preventing further liver damage, managing complications through medications and procedures, and potentially liver transplantation for severe cases.
This document discusses the components and process of nursing diagnosis. It begins by outlining the 5 components of the nursing process: assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation. It then focuses on the diagnostic phase, explaining the differences between medical and nursing diagnosis. It provides details on the types of nursing diagnoses according to client status, and how nursing diagnoses are formulated using NANDA terminology and diagnostic statement structures. Factors involved in analyzing data, determining strengths, and prioritizing diagnoses are also summarized.
The document discusses acute and chronic renal failure. It defines the key functions of the kidney system and describes important lab values used to assess renal function such as BUN and creatinine. It distinguishes between the different types and causes of acute renal failure including pre-renal, intra-renal, and post-renal. Medical management focuses on fluid balance, electrolyte control, and removing any obstructions. Chronic renal failure is typically irreversible and results from long-standing kidney damage from conditions like diabetes or hypertension.
The document discusses disorders of the liver, gallbladder, and pancreas. It provides information on the functions of the liver and describes conditions such as jaundice, cirrhosis, hepatitis, liver tumors, and their signs and symptoms. Gallbladder disorders like cholelithiasis and cholecystitis are covered. Pancreatitis, both acute and chronic, as well as pancreatic cancer, are explained in terms of pathophysiology, assessment findings, and treatment. Nursing management is also addressed for various conditions.
This document discusses evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing. It defines EBP as integrating the best research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values and needs. The document outlines the history of EBP beginning in the 1980s and its focus on improving patient outcomes. It also discusses the skills needed for EBP, including critical thinking, information literacy, and communication skills. The five key steps of the EBP process are also summarized: formulating a clinical question, gathering evidence, appraising evidence, integrating evidence with expertise and patient preferences, and evaluating the practice change.
The Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) was established in 1976 to provide routine childhood immunizations against six diseases: tuberculosis, polio, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and measles. The program aims to reduce child mortality from vaccine-preventable diseases and has specific goals around immunizing children, maintaining polio-free status, eliminating measles, and controlling other diseases. The EPI follows principles of targeting eligible populations, focusing on epidemiology, and providing immunization as a basic health service. It utilizes a cold chain system to store and transport vaccines according to their temperature sensitivities.
The document discusses critical care nursing in the Philippines. It describes how critical care nursing deals with life-threatening illnesses and injuries. It outlines the responsibilities of critical care nurses to provide optimal care for critically ill patients and their families. It also discusses the development of critical care practice in the Philippines and the role of the Critical Care Nurses of the Philippines organization in promoting education and professional development in the field.
This document discusses various topics related to medication administration including:
- Types of medications and their purposes
- Therapeutic actions and effects of drugs
- Different types of doctors' orders and parts of prescriptions
- Routes of drug administration including their advantages and disadvantages
- The 11 rights of drug administration and importance of proper attitude when administering medications
The document provides information to help understand proper medication administration procedures and guidelines.
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...TechSoup
Whether you're new to SEO or looking to refine your existing strategies, this webinar will provide you with actionable insights and practical tips to elevate your nonprofit's online presence.
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...EduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher, Director of Education and Skills at the OECD presents at the launch of PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Minds, Creative Schools on 18 June 2024.
This presentation was provided by Rebecca Benner, Ph.D., of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
2. RUBRICS
It is a scoring method used to describe a
student’s performance
It articulates gradations of quality foreach
criterion, from excellent to poor
Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
3. PURPOSE OF RUBRICS
THE MAIN PURPOSE:
- to assess
performancesReference:
Brookhart, Susan M. (2013). How To Create And Use Rubrics For Formative Assessment And Grading. Retrieved
March 9, 2020, from http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/112001/chapters/What-Are-Rubrics-and-Why-Are-
They-Important%C2%A2.aspx.
4. TYPES OF PERFORMANCES THAT CAN BE
ASSESSED WITH RUBRICS
Reference:
Brookhart, Susan M. (2013). How To Create And Use Rubrics For Formative Assessment And Grading. Retrieved
March 9, 2020, from http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/112001/chapters/What-Are-Rubrics-and-Why-Are-
They-Important%C2%A2.aspx.
TYPES OF PERFORMANCE EXAMPLE
PROCESSES
• Physical skills
• Use of equipment
• Oral communication
• Work habits
• Playing a musical instrument
• Doing a forward roll
• Preparing a slide for the
microscope
• Making a speech to the class
• Reading aloud
• Conversing in a foreign language
• Working independently
5. TYPES OF PERFORMANCES THAT CAN BE
ASSESSED WITH RUBRICS
Reference:
Brookhart, Susan M. (2013). How To Create And Use Rubrics For Formative Assessment And Grading. Retrieved
March 9, 2020, from http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/112001/chapters/What-Are-Rubrics-and-Why-Are-
They-Important%C2%A2.aspx.
TYPES OF PERFORMANCE EXAMPLE
PRODUCTS
• Constructed objects
• Written essays, themes, reports,
term papers
• Other academic products that
demonstrate understanding of
concepts
• Wooden bookshelf
• Set of welds
• Handmade apron
• Watercolor painting
• Laboratory report
• Term paper on theatrical conventions in
Shakespeare's day
• Written analysis of the effects of the Marshall
Plan
• Model or diagram of a structure (atom, flower,
planetary system, etc.)
• Concept map
6. SUGGESTED STEPS IN CREATING RUBRIC
1. SURVEY MODELS
Show students example of good and not-so-
good work
Identify the characteristics that make the good
ones good and the bad ones bad
Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
7. SUGGESTED STEPS IN CREATING RUBRIC
2. DEFINE CRITERIA
From the discussionS if the models, identify
the aualities that define good work
Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
8. SUGGESTED STEPS IN CREATING RUBRIC
3. AGREE ON THE LEVELS OF QUALITY
Describe the best and worst levels of quality
Fill in the middle levels based on your
knowledge of common problems and the
discussion of not-so-good work
Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
9. SUGGESTED STEPS IN CREATING RUBRIC
4. PRACTICE ON MODELS
Using the agreed criteria and levels of quality,
evaluate the models presented in step 1
together with the student
Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
10. SUGGESTED STEPS IN CREATING RUBRIC
5. USE SELF AND PEER ASSESSMENT
Give students their task
As they work, stop them occasionally for self
and peer assessment
Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
11. SUGGESTED STEPS IN CREATING RUBRIC
6. REVISE
Always give students time to revise their work
based on the feedback they get in step 5
Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
12. SUGGESTED STEPS IN CREATING RUBRIC
7. USE TEACHER ASSESSMENT
Usethe same rubrics students used to assess
their work yourselfq
Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
14. DESIRED CHARACTERISTICS OF CRITERIA
FOR CLASSROOM RUBRICS
Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
CHARACTERISTICS
The criteria are: EXPLANATION
Appropriate Each criterion represents an
aspect of a standard, curricular
goal, or instructional goal or
objective that students are
intended to learn
15. Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
CHARACTERISTICS
The criteria are: EXPLANATION
Definable Each criterion has a clear,
agreed-upon meaning that both
students and teachers
understand.
DESIRED CHARACTERISTICS OF CRITERIA
FOR CLASSROOM RUBRICS
16. Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
CHARACTERISTICS
The criteria are: EXPLANATION
Observable Each criterion describes a quality
in the performance that can be
perceived (seen or heard,
usually) by someone other than
the person performing.
DESIRED CHARACTERISTICS OF CRITERIA
FOR CLASSROOM RUBRICS
17. Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
CHARACTERISTICS
The criteria are: EXPLANATION
Distinct from one another Each criterion identifies a
separate aspect of the learning
outcomes the performance is
intended to assess
DESIRED CHARACTERISTICS OF CRITERIA
FOR CLASSROOM RUBRICS
18. Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
CHARACTERISTICS
The criteria are: EXPLANATION
Complete All the criteria together describe
the whole of the learning
outcomes the performance is
intended to assess
DESIRED CHARACTERISTICS OF CRITERIA
FOR CLASSROOM RUBRICS
19. Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
CHARACTERISTICS
The criteria are: EXPLANATION
Able to support descriptions
along a continuum of quality
Each criterion can be described
over a range of performance
level
DESIRED CHARACTERISTICS OF CRITERIA
FOR CLASSROOM RUBRICS
20. ORAL READING FLUENCY RUBRIC
Name: ______________________________ Date: ________
1 2 3 4
Expression No expression
A little
expression
Same
expression
Lots of
expression
Phrasing No expression
A little
expression
Same
phrasing
Very good
phrasing
Speed
Way too slow
or way too
fast
A little bit
too slow or a
little bit too
fast
Almost
perfect but
still needs
practice
Just right!
Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
Example of CRITERIA for classroom Rubric
22. Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
CHARACTERISTICS
The descriptions of levels of
performance are:
EXPLANATION
Descriptive Performance is described in terms
of what is observed in the work
DESIRED CHARACTERISTICS OF DESCRIPTION OF
LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE FOR CLASSROOM
RUBRICS
23. Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
CHARACTERISTICS
The descriptions of levels of
performance are:
EXPLANATION
Clear Both students and teachers
understand what the descriptions
mean
DESIRED CHARACTERISTICS OF DESCRIPTION OF
LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE FOR CLASSROOM
RUBRICS
24. Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
CHARACTERISTICS
The descriptions of levels of
performance are:
EXPLANATION
Cover the whole range of
performance
Performance is described from one
extreme of the continuum of
quality to another for each
criterion
DESIRED CHARACTERISTICS OF DESCRIPTION OF
LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE FOR CLASSROOM
RUBRICS
25. Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
CHARACTERISTICS
The descriptions of levels of
performance are:
EXPLANATION
Distinguish among levels Performance descriptions are
different enough from level to
level that work can be categorized
unambiguously. It should be
possible to match examples of
work to performance descriptions
at each level.
DESIRED CHARACTERISTICS OF DESCRIPTION OF
LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE FOR CLASSROOM
RUBRICS
26. Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
CHARACTERISTICS
The descriptions of levels of
performance are:
EXPLANATION
Center the target
performance (acceptable,
mastery, passing) at the
appropriate level
The description of performance at
the level expected by the
standard, curriculum goal, or
lesson objective is placed at the
intended level on the rubric.
DESIRED CHARACTERISTICS OF DESCRIPTION OF
LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE FOR CLASSROOM
RUBRICS
27. Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
CHARACTERISTICS
The descriptions of levels of
performance are:
EXPLANATION
Feature parallel descriptions
from level to level
Performance description at each
level of the continuum for a given
standard describe different quality
levels for the same aspects of the
work.
DESIRED CHARACTERISTICS OF DESCRIPTION OF
LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE FOR CLASSROOM
RUBRICS
28. BOOK TALK RUBRIC
Name: ______________________________ Date: ________
CRITERIA
Did I get my
audience’s
attention?
Creative
beginning Boring No beginning
Did I tell what
kind of book?
Tells exactly
what type of
book it is
Not sure, not
clear
Didn’t mention it
Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
Example of DESCRIPTIONS OF LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE for classroom Rubric
Q. U. A. L. I. T. Y
29. BOOK TALK RUBRIC
Name: ______________________________ Date: ________
CRITERIA
Did I tell
something about
the main
character?
Included facts
about the
character
Slid over
character
Did not tell
anything about
the main
character
Did I mention the
setting?
Tells when and
where story takes
place
Not sure, not
clear
Didn’t mention
setting.
Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
Example of DESCRIPTIONS OF LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE for classroom Rubric
Q. U. A. L. I. T. Y
30. BOOK TALK RUBRIC
Name: ______________________________ Date: ________
CRITERIA
Did I tell one
interesting part?
Made it sound
interesting, I
want to buy it
Told part and
skipped on to
something else
Forgot to do it.
Did I tell who
might like this
book?
Did tell Skipped over it Forgot to tell
Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
Example of DESCRIPTIONS OF LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE for classroom Rubric
Q. U. A. L. I. T. Y
31. BOOK TALK RUBRIC
Name: ______________________________ Date: ________
CRITERIA
How did I look?
Hair combed
neat, clean
clothes, smiled,
looked up, happy
Lazy look Just-got-out-of-
bed look, head
down
How did I sound? Clear, strong,
cheerful voice
No expression in
voice
Difficult to
understand- 6-
inch voice or
screeching
Reference: Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017). Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd
ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar Publishing.
Example of DESCRIPTIONS OF LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE for classroom Rubric
Q. U. A. L. I. T. Y
32. References
Brookhart, Susan M. (2013). How To Create And Use Rubrics For
Formative Assessment And Grading. Retrieved March 9, 2020, from
http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/112001/chapters/What-
Are-Rubrics-and-Why-Are-They-Important%C2%A2.aspx.
Navarro, Rosita L., Santos, Rosita G., & Corpuz, Brenda B. (2017).
Assessment Of Learning 1 (3rd ed.). Quezon City: Lori Mar
Publishing.