This document describes a comparative analysis project that evaluated whether a rapid qualitative analysis approach could deliver findings more quickly than a traditional in-depth analysis method. The rapid analysis used summary templates to analyze data within a short timeframe, while the in-depth analysis used coding and the Framework method. The results found that rapid analysis was much faster for data management but took longer for interpretation. Both methods produced similar key issues and recommendations, but the in-depth analysis provided more specific, context-informed findings. The document reflects on the applications and limitations of rapid qualitative analysis approaches.