Download to read offline
Question 3
- 1. Question 3. WhatHave You Learnt From Your Audience Feedback? LUCY OLLIER
- 2. Most people foundthe topic of our documentary interesting which gives us a positive outlook on the topic of hair in which we chose. I learnt that a topic of documentary should be interesting in order to engage a wider audience.
- 3. We got arange of different responses from this question which demonstrates that people have a different outlook on their idea of entertaining. What may be entertaining to one person might not be for another.
- 4. From this feedback,the sound seemed to be an issue within the documentary. I have since learnt that the sound needs to be correct in the way that the music bed needs to be quieter and the dialogue from interviews needs to be louder. I am aware of how to edit this on premier.
- 5. From these resultswe can see that we met our goal of creating a documentary which is similar to professional ones as we followed codes and conventions so that the documentary can be recognised as being that genre.
- 6. From these results,it is clear that our print advert was relatively eye catching and that some of the audience were interested in it. This is important as it is used to advertise the main product. This could be improved by better editing skills.
- 7. The audience feltthat all three products which we created fit well as a package. This is important because the radio and print adverts are used to advertise the main product. We linked them by using the same narrator, the same slogan and the same title. We also used sound bites from the documentary within the radio advert.
- 8. The majority ofthe audience said that they would watch the full documentary but some said they didn’t. From this feedback we could have tried to make our documentary more interesting by including a wider range of interviewees and vox pops in order to make everyone want to watch the full 30 minutes.
- 9. From this wefound that the mise en scene was relevant to the theme of hair as there were hair products in the backgrounds of interviews. To improve this, we could have interviewed students in a more suitable area and made hairdressers wear relevant clothing during interviews.
- 10. Everyone thought thatthe people interviewed were relevant to the theme of the documentary so nothing in this area would need improving. We interviewed hairdressers and students but we could have interviewed a barber as well to make it more varied.
- 11. Most people wereinterested in the documentary and it kept them entertained although some people weren’t interested. To improve this, we could have included a wider range of footage to make the documentary more intriguing.
- 12. Overall, people didthink the quality of footage was good but some thought it could be improved. To improve on this we could have checked that the camera was in focus and ensured that the tripod was in correct condition.
- 13. These results showthat the time and channel for the programme is convenient for the audience. I feel that this should not be changed as ITV2 is a fitting channel to watch the documentary on based on the topic.
- 14. The majority ofpeople feel that the products are of a good standard which means that they look professional due to us following codes and conventions. This does not need to be improved as the audience is happy with the final outcome.
- 15. Most people enjoyedthe interviews which assures us that they were of a good quality and that the people who we interviewed were exciting, interesting and relevant. I believe that we did the interviews well as these were the main focus of the documentary.
- 16. I believe thatto improve the documentary, more cut aways could have been included to make it more interesting and quality of footage could have been a better quality in regards to some of it being blurry and out of focus.