The document summarizes the responses to a 15 question questionnaire about a documentary. Key findings include: - 100% of respondents said they would watch the full documentary after 5 minutes and identified the target age group as 16-25. - Ratings for editing, voiceover, camerawork, mise-en-scene and music were mostly 4-5 out of 5. - Respondents felt the title, trailer, and print ad all effectively conveyed the documentary topic and linked together well. - Feedback was overwhelmingly positive, with most aspects rated highly and respondents expressing interest in watching the full film.

1. Question 3
Evaluation
Questionnaire analysis

2. Question 1
• The first question asked in our questionnaire was “after
watching the first 5 minutes of our documentary, are
you interested in watching the whole documentary?”
• From this question we received very good feedback as
every person who filled the questionnaire out (14
people) all of them said they would be interested in
watching the rest of the documentary. This shows us
that in the first 5 minutes we were able to show the
topic of the documentary effectively and make the sub-
topics appear interesting.

3. 100%
0%
Would you watch the rest of our documentary after watching the first 5 minutes?
Yes
No

4. Question 2
• The second question in our questionnaire was “What age group
would you say the documentary is aimed at?”
• This question gave us a broad range of responses however out of
the 14 people who answered the questionnaire 11 of these people
believed the target audience was for those aged between 16 and
25. One person thought that even those who were 15 would be
considered our target audience. Another respondent from our
questionnaire believed that someone up to the age of 35 could be
considered as our target audience. Generally though, the main
responses included those in their mid-teens up to mid-twenties.
This is the correct target audience for the documentary as it is
aimed at teenagers who have been looking for a job or even
teenagers who have a part time job and are on zero hour contracts.
The response to this question shows us that we have successfully
been able to portray who our target audience is through the first 5
minutes of the docume

5. 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
16-25 15+ up to 35
Who is our target audience?

6. Question 3
• The next question was “on a scale of 1-5, rate the following aspects of our
documentary (1 being least, 5 being the most)” The 5 aspects were editing,
voiceover, camerawork, mise-en-scene and music.
• For the first aspect (editing) we received a rating of 5 from 5 of the respondents.
With the lowest rating given being 3, the majority of respondents gave us a 4. This
range means that the editing on our documentary was of a high quality standard
and that there must have been few mistakes that made the overall documentary
look unprofessional. The second aspect that we asked our respondents to rate was
the voiceover. This was another aspect that we scored highly on with 9 people
giving us a 5 rating. This tells us that the voiceover was clear and easily understood
by the audience. This is good as if the voiceover is clear to understand then the
information that the voiceover tells the audience is understood, making the
documentary look more professional. The third aspect we asked the audience to
score us on was the camerawork in our documentary. The majority of respondents
(8) rated us 4 out of 5 with another 5 people saying our camerawork was a 5 out of
5. This shows us that we were able to get across our message about young people
in work by using a range of different shot types and camera movements. We were
then rated on the mise-en-scene, which was again rated highly with half of
respondents saying the mise-en-scene in our documentary was relevant and it
portrayed documentaries topic well. Finally the music in our title sequence was
also highly rated with 8 people rating it 5 out of 5.

7. 0
10
20
16-25 15+ up to 35
Who is our target
audience?
0% 0% 21%
43%
36%
Editing
1 out of 5 2 out of 5 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 5 out of 5
1 out of 52 out of 53 out of 54 out of 55 out of 5
0 0 1
4
9
Voiceover1
out
of 5
0%
2 out of 5
0%
3
out
of 5
7%
4 out of 5
57%
5 out of 5
36%
Camerawork
0%0%8%
38%54%
Mise-en-scene
1 out of 5
2 out of 5
3 out of 5
4 out of 5
5 out of 5 0 2 4 6 8 10
1 out of 5
2 out of 5
3 out of 5
4 out of 5
5 out of 5
Music

8. Question 4
• The fourth question asked “does the title sequence
connote the topic of the documentary? How?”
• All respondents said yes to this question and many
people gave reasons as to why they said this. Typical
responses included that the title sequence linked well
with the topic of the documentary, which was said
three times. Further responses included that the shot
types used had connotations of work and this allowed
the audience to instantly see the topic of the
documentary. Another response that was repeated by
a few people was that the music tied in nicely with the
topic.

9. 43%
28%
29%
Does our title sequence link well with the documentary topic?
Title sequence links well with topic
Music related well with the topic
Shot types used linked well

10. Question 5
• “Would you say the title links to the
documentary? Why?”
• All respondents said they believed the title linked
to the documentary with some saying that this
was due to the way we linked the title with a
shop name and that it has connotations of work.
This tells us that the title is effective in promoting
the topic of the documentary and that it ties in
nicely with the title sequence and sub-topics.

11. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Relates to the topic of work
Ties in nicley with sub-topics
Does our title relate to the topic of our documentary?

12. Question 6
• “After listening to the radio trailer, does this make you want to
watch the documentary? Why?”
• All but one of the people who answered our questionnaire said yes
to this question. The reasons given were mainly saying that the
radio trailer was informative as it gave a good amount of
information on what the documentary was on however, it didn’t
give too much away. Another reason people said they would watch
the documentary after hearing the radio advert is due to the
background music chosen and the voiceover being clear and easily
understood. The one person who said they would not watch the
documentary after listening to the radio advert said they wouldn’t
due to the background music used. This may tell us that the music
could be too loud and distract the audience from the voiceover.
However, it might just be that the one person who said no was not
a fan of the song choice.

13. Question 7
• “Is the voiceover for our radio trailer clear and
understandable?”
• One person said no to this question and
explained by saying that the music was too loud
and this made the voiceover become less easily
understood. However, 13 of the respondents said
that the voiceover was clear and easy to
understand. This tells us that the voiceover itself
was very clear however maybe the music bed
may have been too loud.

14. Question 8
• “What aspects of the radio trailer work well? Why?”
• In this question we gave the respondents a choice of
three things. These three things were split evenly with
9 people saying the soundbed worked well, 9 people
saying the voiceover was good and 9 people saying
that the clips from the interviews fit well with the radio
advert. This shows us that some people must have
circled more than one feature, telling us that overall
the radio trailer accurately advertises the documentary.

15. 34%
33%
33%
What aspects of our radio trailer worked well?
Soundbed
Clips from interviews
Voiceover

16. Question 9
• “On a scale of 1-5, how would you rate the radio trailer on the
following aspects?”
• The soundbed was the first thing we asked to be rated on and the
majority liked the soundbed as they rated it a 5. This tells us that
the music used in the background of the radio advert was relevant
to the topic of the documentary. Next was the editing in the radio
trailer and this was highly rated as 8 out of 14 people gave us a 5 for
the editing and the other 6 a 4. We were then rated on the voice
over which received another 8 5’s. This tells us that the voiceover
was clear and easily understood, giving the radio trailer a
professional vibe. Finally the respondents rated the use of clips
from the interview. This was highly rated as the typical response
was a 5. This shows us that the use of soundbites from the
documentary was effective as people were able to link the topic of
the documentary with radio advert, meaning it advertises the
documentary well.

17. 0% 0%
15%
39%
46%
Soundbed
1 out of 5 2 out of 5 3 out of 5 4 out of 5 5 out of 5
Editing
1 out of 5
2 out of 5
3 out of 5
4 out of 5
5 out of 5
0 2 4 6 8
1 out of 5
2 out of 5
3 out of 5
4 out of 5
5 out of 5
Voiceover
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 out of 5 2 out of 5 3 out of 5 4 out of 5 5 out of 5
Use of clips
34%
33%
33%
What aspects of our radio
trailer worked well?
Soundbed
Clips from interviews
Voiceover

18. Question 10
• “What could be improved in the print advert?”
• This question allowed a variety of responses, however
half of the people who answered our questionnaire
believed that nothing could of been improved in the
print advert. However, some people said that the
positioning and the font of our title could be improved.
Others said that the colours included on the print
advert could be brighter. This suggests that although
we did edit the image in Photoshop to make it brighter
and more appealing to the viewer, it could have done
better.

19. Question 11
• “What are the strengths and weaknesses of our print ad? Explain
your answer”
• For strengths the majority of people said that the image was the
strong point of the print advert as it stood out from the text and
filled the majority of the print advert. Other strengths includes the
text that was used on the print ad. This refers to the codes and
conventions as we were able to include the channel (logo) and the
date of when the documentary would be aired. Furthermore, other
audience feedback told us that the print advert was directly related
to the topic of the documentary and this acted as a strength.
Weaknesses included the title and the font used for the title. One
person also stated that the logo did not stand out enough from the
background and that it was “lost”. This suggests that we would
perhaps need to work on our colour scheme of the print advert.

20. Question 12
• “Does the print advert make you want to
watch our documentary?”
• All of the respondents said that from looking
at the print advert they are intrigued by the
documentary and would consider watching it.
Many people stated that it made the topic
look interesting and therefore they would
watch the documentary.

21. Question 13
• “Does the image on the print advert connote
the narrative of the documentary?”
• All of the people who answered our
questionnaire said that they believed the main
image of the print advert expressed the
narrative of the documentary. The explanation
for this was due to the front of a shop having
connotations of work and this was the central
theme of the documentary.

22. Question 14
• “Overall, how well would you say our 3
products work together? Do they link? Why?”
• Everyone said that they thought the 3
products linked well together. It was evident
that people thought this from the good
feedback throughout. Many people said that
the three products all showed the same
narrative.

23. Question 15
• “Did you learn anything from the documentary?”
• All 14 people said they had learnt something
from the documentary. The majority of people
said they had learnt about the number of people
of zero hour contracts and this had shocked
them. Others said that they had learnt the facts
and figures about working when young.
Furthermore, people stated that the sub-topic of
child labour was very intriguing and that they
were able to learn about what it was like for
children in the past.