This document discusses improving the methodology for entering ship's force planned maintenance system (PMS) items into the shipyard scheduling database. The current process duplicates existing systems and results in significant workload. Only PMS items meeting specific criteria, such as requiring dry dock work or affecting major ship systems, will require entry. The assistant project team will identify qualifying items and provide others to nuclear and non-nuclear test codes for review. This aims to reduce workload while ensuring critical PMS items are integrated.
Dynamic Scheduling for Shutdowns and TurnaroundsEJ (Ted) Lister
Learn how dynamic scheduling for industry shutdowns and turnarounds can help you achieve a safer, more reliable and cost-effective optimized process outage.
Dynamic Scheduling for Shutdowns and TurnaroundsEJ (Ted) Lister
Learn how dynamic scheduling for industry shutdowns and turnarounds can help you achieve a safer, more reliable and cost-effective optimized process outage.
Favorite Delay Analysis Methodologies Town Hall SEIChris Carson
Presentation from a Town Hall session to discuss favorite forensic schedule analysis methodologies, based on the Forensic Analysis Recommended Practice from AACE International. The Best Practices and Guidelines for Schedule Impact Analysis project is discussing methods.
How to build a credible performance measurement baseline (v5)Glen Alleman
Having the EV numbers all lined up is a necessary but not sufficient condition for program success. Elements of the Performance Measurement Baseline must be Credible to increase the Probability of Program Success.
Building tune ups for commercial buildingsBetterBricks
A building tune-up is a periodic (every 2-3 years) process intended to identify and implement cost effective operational improvements that will improve a building’s energy performance, given current operating conditions and occupant needs. Changes resulting from a building tune-up usually require minimal investments and can be accomplished through simple equipment adjustments or reprogramming of controls
Computer Aided Process Planning (CAPP): concepts; traditional and CAPP; automated
process planning: process planning, general methodology of group technology, code
structures of variant and generative process planning methods, AI in process planning,
process planning software.
Flexible Manufacturing Systems (FMS): Introduction, types, concepts, need and
advantages of FMS - cellular and FMS - JIT and GT applied to FMS.
Favorite Delay Analysis Methodologies Town Hall SEIChris Carson
Presentation from a Town Hall session to discuss favorite forensic schedule analysis methodologies, based on the Forensic Analysis Recommended Practice from AACE International. The Best Practices and Guidelines for Schedule Impact Analysis project is discussing methods.
How to build a credible performance measurement baseline (v5)Glen Alleman
Having the EV numbers all lined up is a necessary but not sufficient condition for program success. Elements of the Performance Measurement Baseline must be Credible to increase the Probability of Program Success.
Building tune ups for commercial buildingsBetterBricks
A building tune-up is a periodic (every 2-3 years) process intended to identify and implement cost effective operational improvements that will improve a building’s energy performance, given current operating conditions and occupant needs. Changes resulting from a building tune-up usually require minimal investments and can be accomplished through simple equipment adjustments or reprogramming of controls
Computer Aided Process Planning (CAPP): concepts; traditional and CAPP; automated
process planning: process planning, general methodology of group technology, code
structures of variant and generative process planning methods, AI in process planning,
process planning software.
Flexible Manufacturing Systems (FMS): Introduction, types, concepts, need and
advantages of FMS - cellular and FMS - JIT and GT applied to FMS.
Mitigation And Performance Recovery Using Earned ValueChris Carson
This paper discusses the practical use of Earned Value metrics and calculations in monitoring and controlling schedule slippage, and, more importantly, in identifying appropriate mitigation plans to regain time.
Hyperspring Implementation of BWROG EP/SAG CONTE 2019GSE Systems, Inc.
GSE subsidiary Hyperspring presentation given at CONTE 2019. The presentation was on the implementation of the BWR owners group emergency operating procedures and severe accident guidelines and was given by Hyperspring's Rick Shindel
2. Purpose of Initiative
• Improve methodology for entry of Ship’s Force
PMS items into the shipyard scheduling
database.
3. What problem are we trying to solve?
• The current process duplicates the existing • For many PMS items, there is no value
SF PMS management system. added to including them into the master
• Current requirements result in significant integrated schedule (MIS).
churn in the SFZMs schedule. • Expectations for entry of PMS items into
• Volume of PMS items in the SFZMs the AWP to develop a line item/cu phase
schedule creates a significant are inordinately cumbersome and require
administrative burden to manage, taking significant effort when work around
time away from more critical items. methods exist that would significantly
• Mismanaged PMS items in the schedule reduce the required effort.
skew the graphs and make them poor • Shipboard Work Center Supervisors are
management tools for senior leadership unfamiliar with the work package during
on the ship. the initial stages of availability planning
• Volume of PMS items entered significantly and do not have access to or co-location
adds to the load of the APT and takes their with the shipyard which provides for a
time away from more critical planning significant challenge when asking them to
aspects. develop their PMS plan.
• Artificial scheduling constraints remove
the requisite flexibility for PMS item
scheduling and accomplishment.
4. What won’t change?
• The intent of this proposal is not to remove the
requirement for entry of SF PMS items into the
Master Integrated Schedule (MIS).
• There is no intent to change the method for RPPY
maintained PMS items entry into the BAWP.
• PMS Items to be accomplished by the shipyard
will continue to be addressed via the BAWP or
AWP.
• SF PMS items that meet specific criteria will be
entered into the shipyard scheduling database.
5. Process Recommendations
• PMS items to be accomplished by Ship’s Force will not require a JSN
(AWP Line Item) to be entered into the shipyard scheduling
database. Some SF PMS actions will continue to require JSNs (e.g.
requires parts, etc.). NOTE: Other more efficient methodology for
accomplishing this task will be discussed below.
• Only those PMS items that meet specified criteria (identified below)
will require entry into the shipyard scheduling database.
• The APT will assume the responsibility for initial review of the cyclic
and quarterly schedules to identify which PMS actions meet the
specified criteria.
• The Nuclear and Non-Nuclear Test codes will be provided a list of
PMS items that were identified as not meeting the below criteria
for a cursory review at the line item level.
6. Criteria for PMS Integration
• Requires a specific plant/ship’s condition. (e.g.
accomplish in dry dock)
• Effects a major distributed system (e.g. CHT,
Firemain, etc.)
• Is on a component or affects a component that
has other work being performed on it.
• Is required to support a test program (e.g. startup
PMS, pre-requisite item , etc.)
• PMS action cannot be fully completed (e.g. any
retests that can’t be accomplished in conjunction
with the PMS may require a test line item)