This is a research project based on Performance checking of the Routing Protocols. This Presentation shows the basic knowledge of the Protocols use (AODV, DSDV and DSR) and in the end it shows the Result and Conclusion by comparing the graphs which are generated through out the work.

1. Performance Evaluation of AODV, DSDV and DSR
Routing Protocols
Submitted to: Submitted by:
Ms. Vartika Saxena Soham Gupta (9910103429)
Mrs. Ambalika Sarkar Ankush Mehta (9910103436)
Mr. Sanjeev Patel

2. Objective
The main objective of this project is to study and compare
the working of different routing protocols which are
AODV, DSDV and DSR. With the help of these protocols,
we do a comparative analysis to understand the quality of
communication between the different nodes
communicating in terms of No. of packets dropped,
throughput and various other factors. We are considering
node mobility, node density, node energy as input
parametes for doing the same.
The topology will be simulated using Network Simulator
(NS2). The simulation results show that the network using
routing protocol can provide quality of service support
and react dynamically to the network status changes with
low control overheads.

3. Output Parameters
1) Throughput
Ratio of received packets with sent packets.
2) Dropped packets
Total No of packets Dropped.

4. 3) Received Packets
Total number of packets received.
4) Jitter
A packet's delay varies with its position in the queues
of the routers along the path between source and
destination. This variation in delay is known as jitter.
5)Energy
Rate of energy consumption by nodes of different
protocols.

5. ROUTING PROTOCOLS
AODV(Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector Protocol)
 This is an On Demand Mechanism.
 Each node maintain its own routing table.
Source broadcast a route request which contains Source
IP address and Destination IP address.
Each node forwards the packet depending on the IP
address.

6. DSR (Dynamic Source Routing Protocol)
This is an On Demand Mechanism.
It uses Source routing which is a technique whereby
the sender of a packet can specify the route that a
packet should take through the network.
It uses Route discovery is in which suitable source
route by searching its Route Cache of routes
previously learned, but if no route is found in its
cache, it will initiate the Route Discovery protocol to
dynamically find a new route.
 Route maintenance

7. DSDV
( Destination Sequenced Distance Vector Protocol)
Reactive Protocol.
Maintains Routing table at each node.
Follows Bellman Fords algorithm.

8. NO. OF PACKETS DROPPED
• From Figure it is clear that the dropped packets for the AODV protocol
with 100 nodes is pretty much high. It shows high jumps at certain places
which means that the packets are frequently dropped.
•Packets dropped in AODV protocol with 50 nodes is less than the AODV
protocol with 100 nodes although it also shows certain amount of packet
drop at times.
•The packet drop for the AODV protocol with 10 nodes is very low.

9. NO. OF RECEIVED PACKETS
•For DSDV 100 nodes from Figure the no of received packets increases and
decreases in the starting time and after that it increases consistently.
•For DSDV 50 nodes, we find out from Figure that the no of received
packets increases gradually over time for some time but after that we see a
little fall in the same.
•For DSDV 10 nodes protocol, it is clear that no of received packets is
constantly increasing.

10. THROUGHPUT
•Figure shows that the throughput for AODV 100 nodes is constant, but in the end it
has a it has a higher and straight peak graph.
•Figure depicts that the throughput for AODV 50 nodes has no throughput in the
beginning but after that it rises with a straight peak and than remains constant for
some time. It also have a final straight peak towards the end.
•For AODV 10 nodes there is no throughput for a very long time but towards the end of
the graph we see a little throughput.

11. JITTER
•The graph shows that the initial jitter for AODV 10 nodes is at higher peaks and
than it is forming spikes from 10.0 to 150.0 seconds and has a little peak again at
30 seconds.
•For the DSDV 10 nodes the graph shows that the jitter is constantly increasing
and decreasing in the formation of spikes but is always lesser than AODV 10
nodes. http://icanbeatit.wordpress.com/2014/05/30/knowledge-management-
system/

12. Energy
 In this graph we can see that the DSR is constant in energy consumption.
 If we compare it with others (DSR) we see that AODV is consuming energy a
little more faster (but constantly) than DSR.
 And in DSDV we see that the energy consumption is much faster than the
other two. So DSR it most consistent in all three.

13. CONCLUSION
The table gives a comprehensive view of the
performance of the three protocols i.e. AODV, DSR
and DSDV and clearly shows that DSDV gives the
best performance.
Protocols DROPPED
PACKETS
RECEIVED
PACKETS
JITTER THROUGHPUT ENERGY
AODV Highest packet
drop
Most consistency Average
performance
Most consistency Average
consistent
DSDV packet drop
acceptable
Average
consistency
High
performance
Least consistency Least
consistent
DSR Least packet
drop
Least
consistency
Low
performance
Average
consistency
Most
consistent