This document compares the performance of two routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks: Destination Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) and Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV). It presents the results of simulations run using the ns-2 network simulator. The simulations varied the number of nodes, pause time (mobility rate), and number of data sources. The performance metrics measured were packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, and normalized routing load. The results showed that AODV had higher packet delivery ratios and lower routing loads than DSDV. However, AODV experienced higher delays than DSDV due to its on-demand route discovery process. DSDV performed better in low
The Effects of Speed on the Performance of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-hoc...Narendra Singh Yadav
Mobile ad hoc network is a collection of mobile nodes communicating through wireless channels without any existing network infrastructure or centralized administration. Because of the limited transmission range of wireless network interfaces, multiple "hops" may be needed to exchange data across the network. Consequently, many routing algorithms have come into existence to satisfy the needs of communications in such networks. Researchers have conducted many simulations comparing the performance of these routing protocols under various conditions and constraints. One question that arises is whether speed of nodes affects the relative performance of routing protocols being studied. This paper addresses the question by simulating two routing protocols AODV and DSDV. Protocols were simulated using the ns-2 and were compared in terms of packet delivery fraction, normalized routing load and average delay, while varying number of nodes, and speed.
Abstract— A MANETs is a self-configuring network is a collection of mobile hosts that are connected via a wireless link. Opportunistic data forwarding has drawn much attention in the research community of multihop wireless networks. Opportunistic data forwarding is the lack of an efficient, lightweight proactive routing scheme with strong source routing capability. In this project proposed to a lightweight proactive source routing (PSR) protocol. PSR can be maintained at different network topology information than distance vector (DV), link state (LS), optimized link State routing (OLSR), then reactive source routing [e.g., dynamic source routing (DSR)]. In this project concentrate on reducing the overhead at the base line protocols, then testing to the better data transportation. Network Simulator (NS-2) help in testing and implementing to this project for effectively reduced to the overhead in the data transportation.
Comparative Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols and Cluster Head Selection Te...IJERA Editor
Mobile Ad-hoc Network is a kind of wireless network. It is a backbone of new generation advanced communication technology. MANET is an ideal applicant for rescue and emergency situation due to its independence of connected devices of fixed wires. This paper represents a work on trust based system in MANET cluster that can be used to improve the performance of the network even in the existence of not trusted nodes. In the cluster architecture, cluster head and gateway nodes form a communication for routing among neighbouring clusters. But selection of cluster head is the important problem in dynamic Ad-hoc network because cluster head work as coordinator in clustered architecture. In this work, some values have used correspond to the threshold values of forward packet and dropped packet of each node within the network cluster. These values have been used dynamically updated every time and the node is selected as cluster head. In this technique of selecting the node as cluster head, the node which has maximum trusted value is elected as cluster head and this information is updated in every node’s trusted table. After implementation of our desired work, the proposed Dynamic Trust Evaluation of Cluster Head (DTE-CH) technique is analysed with traditional routing protocols and traditional clustering technique viz. Highest Degree Algorithm. The simulation is done by using network simulator software on the basis of different performance metrics throughput, packet delivery ratio, routing overhead, packet drop, average end to end delay and remain energy. Simulation result presents that proposed DTE-CH technique improves the performance of network as compare to most suitable existing AODV MANET protocol based technique as well as traditional highest degree clustering technique.
Comparatively analysis of AODV and DSR in MAC layer for Ad Hoc Environmentijsrd.com
In Wireless Adhoc Network is a group of wireless mobile nodes is an autonomous system of mobile nodes connected by wireless links. Every node operates as an end system and as a router to forward packets. In this paper mainly focused on Mac layer because this layer is most important for the data communication using control the packet loss and we worked on the comparison based performance of wimax802.16 and wireless802.11 networks using Ad hoc on- demand Distance Vector Routing Protocol and Dynamic Source Routing Protocol. In this paper we used the different maximum speed for the network. And this comparison based on unicast On-demand routing procedure and our simulation for mobile ad hoc networks discover and maintain only needed the design and follows the idea that each node by sending routing packets whenever a communication is requested and compared various parameter packet delivery ratio, normalized routing load and e-e delay. These simulations are carried out using the Network simulator version-2. The results presented in this work illustrate the importance in carefully evaluating and implementing routing protocols in an ad hoc environment.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
The Effects of Speed on the Performance of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-hoc...Narendra Singh Yadav
Mobile ad hoc network is a collection of mobile nodes communicating through wireless channels without any existing network infrastructure or centralized administration. Because of the limited transmission range of wireless network interfaces, multiple "hops" may be needed to exchange data across the network. Consequently, many routing algorithms have come into existence to satisfy the needs of communications in such networks. Researchers have conducted many simulations comparing the performance of these routing protocols under various conditions and constraints. One question that arises is whether speed of nodes affects the relative performance of routing protocols being studied. This paper addresses the question by simulating two routing protocols AODV and DSDV. Protocols were simulated using the ns-2 and were compared in terms of packet delivery fraction, normalized routing load and average delay, while varying number of nodes, and speed.
Abstract— A MANETs is a self-configuring network is a collection of mobile hosts that are connected via a wireless link. Opportunistic data forwarding has drawn much attention in the research community of multihop wireless networks. Opportunistic data forwarding is the lack of an efficient, lightweight proactive routing scheme with strong source routing capability. In this project proposed to a lightweight proactive source routing (PSR) protocol. PSR can be maintained at different network topology information than distance vector (DV), link state (LS), optimized link State routing (OLSR), then reactive source routing [e.g., dynamic source routing (DSR)]. In this project concentrate on reducing the overhead at the base line protocols, then testing to the better data transportation. Network Simulator (NS-2) help in testing and implementing to this project for effectively reduced to the overhead in the data transportation.
Comparative Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols and Cluster Head Selection Te...IJERA Editor
Mobile Ad-hoc Network is a kind of wireless network. It is a backbone of new generation advanced communication technology. MANET is an ideal applicant for rescue and emergency situation due to its independence of connected devices of fixed wires. This paper represents a work on trust based system in MANET cluster that can be used to improve the performance of the network even in the existence of not trusted nodes. In the cluster architecture, cluster head and gateway nodes form a communication for routing among neighbouring clusters. But selection of cluster head is the important problem in dynamic Ad-hoc network because cluster head work as coordinator in clustered architecture. In this work, some values have used correspond to the threshold values of forward packet and dropped packet of each node within the network cluster. These values have been used dynamically updated every time and the node is selected as cluster head. In this technique of selecting the node as cluster head, the node which has maximum trusted value is elected as cluster head and this information is updated in every node’s trusted table. After implementation of our desired work, the proposed Dynamic Trust Evaluation of Cluster Head (DTE-CH) technique is analysed with traditional routing protocols and traditional clustering technique viz. Highest Degree Algorithm. The simulation is done by using network simulator software on the basis of different performance metrics throughput, packet delivery ratio, routing overhead, packet drop, average end to end delay and remain energy. Simulation result presents that proposed DTE-CH technique improves the performance of network as compare to most suitable existing AODV MANET protocol based technique as well as traditional highest degree clustering technique.
Comparatively analysis of AODV and DSR in MAC layer for Ad Hoc Environmentijsrd.com
In Wireless Adhoc Network is a group of wireless mobile nodes is an autonomous system of mobile nodes connected by wireless links. Every node operates as an end system and as a router to forward packets. In this paper mainly focused on Mac layer because this layer is most important for the data communication using control the packet loss and we worked on the comparison based performance of wimax802.16 and wireless802.11 networks using Ad hoc on- demand Distance Vector Routing Protocol and Dynamic Source Routing Protocol. In this paper we used the different maximum speed for the network. And this comparison based on unicast On-demand routing procedure and our simulation for mobile ad hoc networks discover and maintain only needed the design and follows the idea that each node by sending routing packets whenever a communication is requested and compared various parameter packet delivery ratio, normalized routing load and e-e delay. These simulations are carried out using the Network simulator version-2. The results presented in this work illustrate the importance in carefully evaluating and implementing routing protocols in an ad hoc environment.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
Prediction Algorithm for Mobile Ad Hoc Network Connection BreaksIJCNCJournal
A Mobile Ad-Hoc Network (MANET) is a decentralized network of mobile node that are connected to an arbitrary topology via wireless connections. The breakdown of the connecting links between adjacent nodes will probably lead to the loss of the transferred data packets. In this research, we proposed an algorithm for link prediction (LP) to enhance the link break provision of the ad hoc on-demand remote protocol (AODV). The proposed algorithm is called the AODV Link Break Prediction (AODVLBP). The AODVLBP prevents link breaks by the use of a predictive measure of the changing signal. The AODVLBP was evaluated using the network simulator version 2.35 (NS2) and compared with the AODV Link prediction (AODVLP) and the AODV routing protocols. The simulation results reveal the effectiveness of AODVLBP in improving network performance in terms of average end-to-end delay, packet delivery ratio, packet overhead ratio, and packet drop-neighbour break.
Influence of Clustering on the Performance of MobileAd Hoc Networks (MANETs)Narendra Singh Yadav
Clustering is an important research area for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) as it increases the capacity of network, reduces the routing overhead and makes the network more scalable in the presence of both high mobility and a large number of mobile nodes. Routing protocols based on flat topology are not scalable because of their built-in characteristics. However, clustering cause overhead which consumes considerable bandwidth, drain mobile nodes energy quickly, likely cause congestion, collision and data delay in larger networks. This paper uses an implementation of the Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), an flat architecture based and the Cluster Based Routing Protocol (CBRP), a cluster architecture based routing protocol to examine the influence of clustering on the performance of mobile ad hoc networks. This paper evaluates channel utilization and control overhead as a function of number of nodes per sq. km to show the effect of clustering. Simulation results show that in high mobility scenarios, CBRP outperforms DSR. CBRP scales well with increasing number of nodes.
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF AODV, DSDV AND AOMDV USING WIMAX IN NS-2IAEME Publication
WiMAX (IEEE 802.16) technology empowers ubiquitous delivery of wireless broadband facility for fixed and mobile users. WiMAX standard describes numerous physical and MAC layer characteristics. Here, an attempt is made to implement some of these physical and MAC layer structures including the mobility extension 802.16e. NS2 (Network Simulator-2) is chosen as the simulator to implement these features as NS2 provides suitable library to simulate network scenario. The performance of the simulated module is analyzed by running AODV, DSDV and AOMDV routing protocols on a wired-cum-wireless WiMAX scenario. The throughput for each routing protocol is calculated for varying number of mobile nodes or subscriber stations.
IJCER (www.ijceronline.com) International Journal of computational Engineeri...ijceronline
Call for paper 2012, hard copy of Certificate, research paper publishing, where to publish research paper,
journal publishing, how to publish research paper, Call For research paper, international journal, publishing a paper, IJCER, journal of science and technology, how to get a research paper published, publishing a paper, publishing of journal, publishing of research paper, research and review articles, IJCER Journal, How to publish your research paper, publish research paper, open access engineering journal, Engineering journal, Mathematics journal, Physics journal, Chemistry journal, Computer Engineering, Computer Science journal, how to submit your paper, peer review journal, indexed journal, research and review articles, engineering journal, www.ijceronline.com, research journals,
yahoo journals, bing journals, International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, Google journals, hard copy of Certificate,
journal of engineering, online Submission
IJERA (International journal of Engineering Research and Applications) is International online, ... peer reviewed journal. For more detail or submit your article, please visit www.ijera.com
Destination Aware APU Strategy for Geographic Routing in MANETEditor IJCATR
In this paper, we have explained the Enhanced Adaptive Position Update strategy for geographic routing in mobile ad hoc
network In Adaptive Position Update strategy, there are two techniques: Mobility prediction rule and On-demand learning rule. Proposed
system is based on the destination aware routing in which path to transfer the data over the network is based on the distance from highly
stable node to the destination node. Results of the proposed system are compared with Periodic Beaconing on the basis of packet delivery
ratio, beacon overhead, energy consumption. Experiment results show a high improvement in results on the parameters energy
consumption, packet delivery ratio and beacon overhead. Proposed work is implemented on the NS2 (Network Simulator) Environment
to perform experiments.
Tree Based Proactive Source Routing Protocol for MANETspaperpublications3
bstract: A mobile adhoc network (MANET) is a wireless communication network and the node that does not lie within the direct transmission range of each other depends on the intermediate nodes to forward data. Opportunistic data forwarding has not been widely utilized in mobile adhoc networks (MANETs) and the main reason is the lack of an efficient lightweight proactive routing scheme with strong source routing capability. PSR protocol facilitates opportunistic data forwarding in MANETs. In PSR, each node maintains a breadth-first search spanning tree of the network rooted at it-self. This information is periodically exchanged among neighboring nodes for updated network topology information. Here added a Mobile sink to reduce the overhead in case of number of child node increases and also to reduce the delay.
IMPROVED NETWORK CONNECTIVITY IN MANETSIJCNCJournal
The growth in wireless communication technologies has resulted in a considerable amount of
attention given to mobile adhoc networks. All mobile hosts in an adhoc network are embedded with
packet forwarding capabilities. It is decentralized and is independent of infrastructure. Since mobile
hosts in an adhoc network usually move freely, the topology of the network changes dynamically and
disconnection occurs frequently. These characteristics require the routing protocols to find an
alternative path towards the destination for data transfer. The existing on-demand routing protocols
does the alternative path establishment only after the disconnection of links in the existing path. The
data sent by the source during alternate path establishment period will be lost leading to incomplete
data transfer. The network traffic will therefore increase considerably. This problem can be overcome
by establishing an alternative path when the existing path is more likely to be broken, by sending a
warning message to the source indicating the likelihood of disconnection. In this paper an attempt has
been made to analyze a protocol that improves the network connectivity by preempting the alternative
path before the existing link gets failed by monitoring the signal strength and ‘age of the path’.
BETTER SCALABLE ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR HYBRID WIRELESS MESH NETWORKcscpconf
There are many routing approaches have been borrowed from mobile ad hoc network to achieve routing solutions in wireless mesh network. WMN was developed for reliable data communication and load balancing. AODV provides loop-free routes even while repairing broken links. This paper have been proposed an improved hierarchical AODV routing protocol
(IH-AODV), which exhibits better scalability and performance in the network. This IH-AODV protocol has been proposed for improvement in the scaling potential of AODV. MAODV allows
each node in the network to send out multicast data packets, used for multicast traffic. The wireless mesh network architecture provides reduction in installation cost, large scale
deployment, reliability and self management. It is mainly focused on implementing military or specialized civilian applications. Two protocols MAODV and IH-AODV were simulated using NS2 package. Simulation results will demonstrate that, IH-AODV scales well for large network
and other metrics are also better than or comparable to MAODV in hybrid WMNs.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
Experiment of Routing Protocol AODV (AdHoc On-demand Distance Vector)IJMER
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) is Peer reviewed, online Journal. It serves as an international archival forum of scholarly research related to engineering and science education.
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) covers all the fields of engineering and science: Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Computer Engineering, Agricultural Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Thermodynamics, Structural Engineering, Control Engineering, Robotics, Mechatronics, Fluid Mechanics, Nanotechnology, Simulators, Web-based Learning, Remote Laboratories, Engineering Design Methods, Education Research, Students' Satisfaction and Motivation, Global Projects, and Assessment…. And many more.
Study of Attacks and Routing Protocol in Wireless Networkijsrd.com
Wireless mesh networks (WMNs) are attractive as a new communication paradigm. Ad hoc routing protocols for WMNs are classified into: (1) proactive, (2) reactive, and (3) hybrid approaches. In general, proactive routing is more suitable for a stationary network, while reactive routing is better for a mobile network with a high mobility. In many applications, a node in WMN is mobile but it can fluctuate between being mobile. Wireless mesh networks is an emergent research area, which is becoming important due to the growing amount of nodes in a network.
A Survey on Cross Layer Routing Protocol with Quality of ServiceIJSRD
Wireless is playing the wide role in today’s industrial application. Central idea of this paper is to enhance quality of service (QoS) for multimedia transmission over ad-hoc network. This paper describes the operational of different QoS routing protocols, their properties and various parameters advantages and disadvantages. Also describes the use of QoS in Cross layer routing protocol. Finally, it concludes by study of all these cross layer QoS routing protocols.
Performance Comparison of Different Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Net...ijtsrd
Wireless sensor network is a wireless network consisting of small nodes with sensing, computation, and wireless communication capabilities. One of the most important issues in Wireless sensor networks WSNs is collecting and processing data perceived from the environment and sending that data to be processed and evaluated. Routing data towards the destination node is a fundamental task in WSNs. The data exchange is supported by multihop communications. Routing protocols are in charge of discovering and maintaining the routes in the networks. In this research work, the performance of the different routing protocols in wireless sensor network based on air pollution area is derived. Sensor nodes are deployed in two types of scenario grid and random. And, simulation result outcomes are evaluated using the different routing protocols like Ad hoc On Demand Distance Vector AODV Destination Sequenced Distance Vector Routing DSDV and Dynamic Source Routing DSR in two scenarios. This system is implemented in Network Simulator NS2 . The main focus of this paper is to evaluate the performance of the different routing protocols in random scenarios. The comparison between three different routing protocols is simulated between 10, 50 and 100 nodes. Khaing Khaing Maw "Performance Comparison of Different Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Network in Air Pollution Area" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-5 , August 2019, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd26760.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/engineering/electronics-and-communication-engineering/26760/performance-comparison-of-different-routing-protocols-for-wireless-sensor-network-in-air-pollution-area/khaing-khaing-maw
Prediction Algorithm for Mobile Ad Hoc Network Connection BreaksIJCNCJournal
A Mobile Ad-Hoc Network (MANET) is a decentralized network of mobile node that are connected to an arbitrary topology via wireless connections. The breakdown of the connecting links between adjacent nodes will probably lead to the loss of the transferred data packets. In this research, we proposed an algorithm for link prediction (LP) to enhance the link break provision of the ad hoc on-demand remote protocol (AODV). The proposed algorithm is called the AODV Link Break Prediction (AODVLBP). The AODVLBP prevents link breaks by the use of a predictive measure of the changing signal. The AODVLBP was evaluated using the network simulator version 2.35 (NS2) and compared with the AODV Link prediction (AODVLP) and the AODV routing protocols. The simulation results reveal the effectiveness of AODVLBP in improving network performance in terms of average end-to-end delay, packet delivery ratio, packet overhead ratio, and packet drop-neighbour break.
Influence of Clustering on the Performance of MobileAd Hoc Networks (MANETs)Narendra Singh Yadav
Clustering is an important research area for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) as it increases the capacity of network, reduces the routing overhead and makes the network more scalable in the presence of both high mobility and a large number of mobile nodes. Routing protocols based on flat topology are not scalable because of their built-in characteristics. However, clustering cause overhead which consumes considerable bandwidth, drain mobile nodes energy quickly, likely cause congestion, collision and data delay in larger networks. This paper uses an implementation of the Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), an flat architecture based and the Cluster Based Routing Protocol (CBRP), a cluster architecture based routing protocol to examine the influence of clustering on the performance of mobile ad hoc networks. This paper evaluates channel utilization and control overhead as a function of number of nodes per sq. km to show the effect of clustering. Simulation results show that in high mobility scenarios, CBRP outperforms DSR. CBRP scales well with increasing number of nodes.
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF AODV, DSDV AND AOMDV USING WIMAX IN NS-2IAEME Publication
WiMAX (IEEE 802.16) technology empowers ubiquitous delivery of wireless broadband facility for fixed and mobile users. WiMAX standard describes numerous physical and MAC layer characteristics. Here, an attempt is made to implement some of these physical and MAC layer structures including the mobility extension 802.16e. NS2 (Network Simulator-2) is chosen as the simulator to implement these features as NS2 provides suitable library to simulate network scenario. The performance of the simulated module is analyzed by running AODV, DSDV and AOMDV routing protocols on a wired-cum-wireless WiMAX scenario. The throughput for each routing protocol is calculated for varying number of mobile nodes or subscriber stations.
IJCER (www.ijceronline.com) International Journal of computational Engineeri...ijceronline
Call for paper 2012, hard copy of Certificate, research paper publishing, where to publish research paper,
journal publishing, how to publish research paper, Call For research paper, international journal, publishing a paper, IJCER, journal of science and technology, how to get a research paper published, publishing a paper, publishing of journal, publishing of research paper, research and review articles, IJCER Journal, How to publish your research paper, publish research paper, open access engineering journal, Engineering journal, Mathematics journal, Physics journal, Chemistry journal, Computer Engineering, Computer Science journal, how to submit your paper, peer review journal, indexed journal, research and review articles, engineering journal, www.ijceronline.com, research journals,
yahoo journals, bing journals, International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, Google journals, hard copy of Certificate,
journal of engineering, online Submission
IJERA (International journal of Engineering Research and Applications) is International online, ... peer reviewed journal. For more detail or submit your article, please visit www.ijera.com
Destination Aware APU Strategy for Geographic Routing in MANETEditor IJCATR
In this paper, we have explained the Enhanced Adaptive Position Update strategy for geographic routing in mobile ad hoc
network In Adaptive Position Update strategy, there are two techniques: Mobility prediction rule and On-demand learning rule. Proposed
system is based on the destination aware routing in which path to transfer the data over the network is based on the distance from highly
stable node to the destination node. Results of the proposed system are compared with Periodic Beaconing on the basis of packet delivery
ratio, beacon overhead, energy consumption. Experiment results show a high improvement in results on the parameters energy
consumption, packet delivery ratio and beacon overhead. Proposed work is implemented on the NS2 (Network Simulator) Environment
to perform experiments.
Tree Based Proactive Source Routing Protocol for MANETspaperpublications3
bstract: A mobile adhoc network (MANET) is a wireless communication network and the node that does not lie within the direct transmission range of each other depends on the intermediate nodes to forward data. Opportunistic data forwarding has not been widely utilized in mobile adhoc networks (MANETs) and the main reason is the lack of an efficient lightweight proactive routing scheme with strong source routing capability. PSR protocol facilitates opportunistic data forwarding in MANETs. In PSR, each node maintains a breadth-first search spanning tree of the network rooted at it-self. This information is periodically exchanged among neighboring nodes for updated network topology information. Here added a Mobile sink to reduce the overhead in case of number of child node increases and also to reduce the delay.
IMPROVED NETWORK CONNECTIVITY IN MANETSIJCNCJournal
The growth in wireless communication technologies has resulted in a considerable amount of
attention given to mobile adhoc networks. All mobile hosts in an adhoc network are embedded with
packet forwarding capabilities. It is decentralized and is independent of infrastructure. Since mobile
hosts in an adhoc network usually move freely, the topology of the network changes dynamically and
disconnection occurs frequently. These characteristics require the routing protocols to find an
alternative path towards the destination for data transfer. The existing on-demand routing protocols
does the alternative path establishment only after the disconnection of links in the existing path. The
data sent by the source during alternate path establishment period will be lost leading to incomplete
data transfer. The network traffic will therefore increase considerably. This problem can be overcome
by establishing an alternative path when the existing path is more likely to be broken, by sending a
warning message to the source indicating the likelihood of disconnection. In this paper an attempt has
been made to analyze a protocol that improves the network connectivity by preempting the alternative
path before the existing link gets failed by monitoring the signal strength and ‘age of the path’.
BETTER SCALABLE ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR HYBRID WIRELESS MESH NETWORKcscpconf
There are many routing approaches have been borrowed from mobile ad hoc network to achieve routing solutions in wireless mesh network. WMN was developed for reliable data communication and load balancing. AODV provides loop-free routes even while repairing broken links. This paper have been proposed an improved hierarchical AODV routing protocol
(IH-AODV), which exhibits better scalability and performance in the network. This IH-AODV protocol has been proposed for improvement in the scaling potential of AODV. MAODV allows
each node in the network to send out multicast data packets, used for multicast traffic. The wireless mesh network architecture provides reduction in installation cost, large scale
deployment, reliability and self management. It is mainly focused on implementing military or specialized civilian applications. Two protocols MAODV and IH-AODV were simulated using NS2 package. Simulation results will demonstrate that, IH-AODV scales well for large network
and other metrics are also better than or comparable to MAODV in hybrid WMNs.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
Experiment of Routing Protocol AODV (AdHoc On-demand Distance Vector)IJMER
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) is Peer reviewed, online Journal. It serves as an international archival forum of scholarly research related to engineering and science education.
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) covers all the fields of engineering and science: Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Computer Engineering, Agricultural Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Thermodynamics, Structural Engineering, Control Engineering, Robotics, Mechatronics, Fluid Mechanics, Nanotechnology, Simulators, Web-based Learning, Remote Laboratories, Engineering Design Methods, Education Research, Students' Satisfaction and Motivation, Global Projects, and Assessment…. And many more.
Study of Attacks and Routing Protocol in Wireless Networkijsrd.com
Wireless mesh networks (WMNs) are attractive as a new communication paradigm. Ad hoc routing protocols for WMNs are classified into: (1) proactive, (2) reactive, and (3) hybrid approaches. In general, proactive routing is more suitable for a stationary network, while reactive routing is better for a mobile network with a high mobility. In many applications, a node in WMN is mobile but it can fluctuate between being mobile. Wireless mesh networks is an emergent research area, which is becoming important due to the growing amount of nodes in a network.
A Survey on Cross Layer Routing Protocol with Quality of ServiceIJSRD
Wireless is playing the wide role in today’s industrial application. Central idea of this paper is to enhance quality of service (QoS) for multimedia transmission over ad-hoc network. This paper describes the operational of different QoS routing protocols, their properties and various parameters advantages and disadvantages. Also describes the use of QoS in Cross layer routing protocol. Finally, it concludes by study of all these cross layer QoS routing protocols.
Performance Comparison of Different Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Net...ijtsrd
Wireless sensor network is a wireless network consisting of small nodes with sensing, computation, and wireless communication capabilities. One of the most important issues in Wireless sensor networks WSNs is collecting and processing data perceived from the environment and sending that data to be processed and evaluated. Routing data towards the destination node is a fundamental task in WSNs. The data exchange is supported by multihop communications. Routing protocols are in charge of discovering and maintaining the routes in the networks. In this research work, the performance of the different routing protocols in wireless sensor network based on air pollution area is derived. Sensor nodes are deployed in two types of scenario grid and random. And, simulation result outcomes are evaluated using the different routing protocols like Ad hoc On Demand Distance Vector AODV Destination Sequenced Distance Vector Routing DSDV and Dynamic Source Routing DSR in two scenarios. This system is implemented in Network Simulator NS2 . The main focus of this paper is to evaluate the performance of the different routing protocols in random scenarios. The comparison between three different routing protocols is simulated between 10, 50 and 100 nodes. Khaing Khaing Maw "Performance Comparison of Different Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Network in Air Pollution Area" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-5 , August 2019, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd26760.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/engineering/electronics-and-communication-engineering/26760/performance-comparison-of-different-routing-protocols-for-wireless-sensor-network-in-air-pollution-area/khaing-khaing-maw
Improved aodv based on energy strength and dropping ratioIJLT EMAS
Wireless Sensor Networks are the latest trends in the
market due to the demand for communication and networking
among the wireless network devices. The routing protocols are
used in the Wireless Sensor Networks for efficient
communication of data between sensor nodes. The designs of
routing protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks are very concern
because they are influenced by many challenging factors. To
design the networks, the factors needed to be considered are the
coverage area, mobility, energy power consumption,
communication capabilities etc.. Broadcasting is an inevitable
operation in the route discovery phase of AODV protocol. A
probability based AODV is proposed, it uses nodes remaining
energy and threshold random delay to generate the
rebroadcasting of route request packet. The route request packet
of AODV is modified to gather nodes remaining energy strength.
The performance of probability based AODV is compared with
AODV over packet delivery fraction, normalized routing
overhead, delay and average acquisition latency.
NS-2 based simulator is used to evaluate the performance of
routing protocol.
A Survey of Enhanced Routing Protocols for Manetspijans
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) form a class of dynamic multi-hop networks consisting of a set of
mobile nodes that intercommunicate on shared wireless channels. MANETs are self-organizing and selfconfiguring multi-hop wireless networks, where the network structure changes dynamically due to the node
mobility. There exists no fixed topology due to the mobility of nodes, interference, multipath propagation
and path loss. Hence efficient dynamic routing protocols are required for these networks to function
properly. Many routing protocols have been developed to accomplish this task. In this paper we survey
various new routing protocols that have been developed as extensions or advanced versions of previously
existing routing protocols for MANETs such as DSR, AODV, OLSR etc.
T HE I MPACT OF TCP C ONGESTION W INDOW S IZE ON THE P ERFORMANCE E VA...ijwmn
A mobile ad hoc network (MANET) is a temporary coll
ection of mobile nodes randomly moved within a
limited terrain area. The nodes are connected to fo
rm a wireless network without use any communication
infrastructure. Because of the limiting resources o
f MANET nodes, multiple hops
scheme is proposed for
data exchange
across the network. Varieties of mobile ad hoc rout
ing protocols have been developed to
support the multi-hop scheme of ad hoc networks. A
popular Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
provides a reliable connection in a computer networ
k environment; it sets its congestion window size i
n
response to the behavior of the network to achieve
the best performance. This work aims to investigate
and
compare the MANET protocol
performance, such as DSDV, AODV and DSR in terms of
network
throughput, average routing load, the packet delive
ry ratio (PDR), and average end-to-end delay by
varying the maximum congestion window size. Our si
mulation has been implemented using a well-known
NS-2.35 network simulator. The simulated results sh
ow that the demonstrates of the concepts of MANET
routing protocols with respect to TCP congestion wi
ndow size in MANET environment
To improve the QoS in MANETs through analysis between reactive and proactive ...CSEIJJournal
A Mobile Ad hoc NETwork (MANET), is a self-configuring infra structure less network of mobile devices
connected by wireless links. ad hoc is Latin and means "for this purpose". Each device in a MANET is free
to move independently in any direction, and will therefore change its links to other devices frequently. Each
must forward traffic unrelated to its own use, and therefore be a router. The primary challenge in building
a MANET is equipping each device to continuously maintain the information required to properly route
traffic. QOS is defined as a set of service requirements to be met by the network while transporting a
packet stream from source to destination. Intrinsic to the notion of QOS is an agreement or a guarantee by
the network to provide a set of measurable pre-specified service attributes to the user in terms of delay,
jitter, available bandwidth, packet loss, and so on. The analysis is mainly between proactive or table-driven
protocols like OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing) viz DSDV (Destination Sequenced Distance Vector) &
CGSR (Cluster Head Gateway Switch Routing) and reactive or source initiated routing protocols viz
AODV (Ad hoc on Demand distance Vector) & DSR (Dynamic Source Routing). The QoS analysis of the
above said protocols is simulated on NS2 and results are shown thereby.
An Effective and Scalable AODV for Wireless Ad hoc Sensor Networksijcnes
Appropriate routing protocol in data transfer is a challenging problem of network in terms of lower end-to-end delay in delivery of data packets with improving packet delivery ratio and lower overhead as well. In this paper we explain an effective and scalable AODV (called as AODV-ES) for Wireless Ad hoc Sensor Networks (WASN) by using third party reply model, n-hop local ring and time-to-live based local recovery. Our goal is to reduce time delay for delivery of the data packets, routing overhead and improve the data packet delivery ratio. The resulting algorithm AODV-ES is then simulated by NS-2 under Linux operating system. The performance of routing protocol is evaluated under various mobility rates and found that the proposed routing protocol is better than AODV.
IJERA (International journal of Engineering Research and Applications) is International online, ... peer reviewed journal. For more detail or submit your article, please visit www.ijera.com
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
PERFORMANCE ESTIMATION OF ADHOC ROUTING PROTOCOLS WITH NS2 SIMULATORIAEME Publication
A mobile adhoc network is a collection of wireless mobile nodes dynamically creating a temporary network without usage of any prevailing network infrastructure or consolidated management. Several routing protocols like Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), Adhoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) and Destination Sequenced Distance-Vector (DSDV) have been implemented. In this paper, an attempt has been made to compare the performance of two prominent on-demand reactive routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks: DSR and AODV, along with the traditional proactive DSDV protocol. A simulation model with MAC and physical layer models is used to study interlayer interactions and their performance inferences. The On-demand protocols, AODV and DSR perform better than the table-driven DSDV protocol. Although DSR and AODV share similar on-demand performance, the differences in the protocol mechanics can lead to significant performance differentials. A variation of workload and scenarios, as characterized by mobility, load and size of the ad hoc network were simulated. The performance analysis is evaluated by means of varying network load, mobility, and network size. These simulations are conceded out based on the Rice Monarch Project that has made considerable additions to the NS-2 network simulator to track adhoc simulations
PERFORMANCE ESTIMATION OF ADHOC ROUTING PROTOCOLS WITH NS2 SIMULATORIAEME Publication
A mobile adhoc network is a collection of wireless mobile nodes dynamically creating a temporary network without usage of any prevailing network infrastructure or consolidated management. Several routing protocols like Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), Adhoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) and Destination Sequenced Distance-Vector (DSDV) have been implemented. In this paper, an attempt has been made to compare the performance of two prominent on-demand reactive routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks: DSR and AODV, along with the traditional proactive DSDV protocol. A simulation model with MAC and physical layer models is used to study interlayer interactions and their performance inferences. The On-demand protocols, AODV and DSR perform better than the table-driven DSDV protocol. Although DSR and AODV share similar on-demand performance, the differences in the protocol mechanics can lead to significant performance differentials. A variation of workload and scenarios, as characterized by mobility, load and size of the ad hoc network were simulated. The performance analysis is evaluated by means of varying network load, mobility, and network size. These simulations are conceded out based on the Rice Monarch Project that has made considerable additions to the NS-2 network simulator to track adhoc simulations
Mobility is one of the basic features that define an ad hoc network, an asset that leaves the field
free for the nodes to move. The most important aspect of this kind of network turns into a great
disadvantage when it comes to commercial applications, take as an example: the automotive
networks that allow communication between a groups of vehicles. The ad hoc on-demand
distance vector (AODV) routing protocol, designed for mobile ad hoc networks, has two main
functions. First, it enables route establishment between a source and a destination node by
initiating a route discovery process. Second, it maintains the active routes, which means finding
alternative routes in a case of a link failure and deleting routes when they are no longer
desired. In a highly mobile network those are demanding tasks to be performed efficiently and
accurately. In this paper, we focused in the first point to enhance the local decision of each node
in the network by the quantification of the mobility of their neighbours. Quantification is made
around RSSI algorithm a well known distance estimation method.
Ad Hoc Networks are infrastructure less network in which nodes are connected by Multi-hop wireless links. Each node is acting as a router as it supports distributed routing. Routing challenges occurs as there are frequent path breaks due to the mobility. Various application domains include military applications, emergency search and rescue operations and collaborative computing. The existing protocols used are divided into proactive and on demand routing protocols. The various new routing algorithms are also designed to optimize the performance of a network in terms of various performance parameters. Dual reinforcement routing is learning based approach used for routing. This paper describes the implementation, mathematical evaluation and judging the performance of a network and analyze it to find the performance of a network.
Similar to Performance Comparison of AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Wireless Networks (20)
On the routing overhead in infrastructureless multihop wireless networksNarendra Singh Yadav
Routing in infrastructureless multihop wireless networks is a challenging task and has received a vast amount of attention from researchers. This has lead to development of many different routing protocols each having their own superiorities and pitfalls making it very difficult to decide on a better protocol under vulnerable scenarios in such networks. In this paper the performance of three routing protocols (DSR, AODV and CBRP) in terms of routing overhead in bytes and in packets is presented under growing density and varying mobility in different traffic conditions. The simulation results show that CBRP outperforms both DSR and AODV in all scenarios.
Mobile ad hoc network is a reconfigurable network of mobile nodes connected by multi-hop wireless links and capable of operating without any fixed infrastructure support. In order to facilitate communication within such self-creating, self-organizing and self administrating network, a dynamic routing protocol is needed. The primary goal of such an ad hoc network routing protocol is to discover and establish a correct and efficient route between a pair of nodes so that messages may be delivered in a timely manner. Route construction should be done with a minimum of overhead and bandwidth consumption. This paper examines two routing protocols, both on-demand source routing, for mobile ad hoc networks– the Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), an flat architecture based and the Cluster Based Routing Protocol (CBRP), a cluster architecture based and evaluates both routing protocols in terms of packet delivery fraction, normalized routing load, average end to end delay, throughput by varying number of nodes per sq. km, traffic sources and mobility. Simulation results show that in high
mobility (pause time 0s) scenarios, CBRP outperforms DSR. CBRP scales well with increasing number of nodes.
A Low Control Overhead Cluster Maintenance Scheme for Mobile Ad hoc NETworks ...Narendra Singh Yadav
Clustering is an important research area for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) as it increases the capacity of network, reduces the routing overhead and makes the network more scalable in the presence of both high mobility and a large number of mobile nodes. In clustering the clusterhead manage and store recent routing information. However the frequent change of clusterhead leads to loss of routing information stored, changes the route between two nodes, affects the performance of the routing protocol and makes the cluster structure unstable. Communication overhead in terms of exchanging messages is needed to elect a new clusterhead. The goal then would be to keep the clusterhead change as least as possible to make cluster structure more stable, to prevent loss of routing information which in turn improve the performance of routing protocol based on clustering. This can be achieved by an efficient cluster maintenance scheme. In this work, a novel clustering algorithm, namely Incremental Maintenance Clustering Scheme (IMS) is proposed for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. The goals are yielding low number of clusterhead and clustermember changes, maintaining stable clusters, minimizing the number of clustering overhead. Through simulations the performance of IMS is compared with that of least cluster change (LCC) and maintenance scheme of Cluster Based Routing Protocol (CBRP) in terms of the number of clusterhead changes, number of cluster-member changes and clustering overhead by varying mobility and speed. The simulation results demonstrate the superiority of IMS over LCC and
maintenance scheme of CBRP.
Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Ad-Hoc Source Routing ProtocolsNarendra Singh Yadav
Mobile ad hoc network is a reconfigurable network of mobile nodes connected by multi-hop wireless links and capable of operating without any fixed infrastructure support. In order to facilitate communication within such self-creating, self-organizing and self-administrating network, a dynamic routing protocol is needed. The primary goal of such an ad hoc network routing protocol is to discover and establish a correct and efficient route between a pair of nodes so that messages may be delivered in a timely manner. Route construction should be done with a minimum of overhead and bandwidth consumption. This paper examines two routing protocols, both on-demand source routing, for mobile ad hoc networks– the Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), an flat architecture based and the Cluster Based Routing Protocol (CBRP), a cluster architecture based and evaluates both routing protocols in terms of packet delivery fraction normalized routing load, average end to end delay by varying speed of nodes, traffic sources and mobility.
Performance Comparison and Analysis of Table-Driven and On-Demand Routing Pro...Narendra Singh Yadav
Mobile ad hoc network is a collection of mobile nodes communicating through wireless channels without any existing network infrastructure or centralized administration. Because of the limited transmission range of wireless network interfaces, multiple "hops" may be needed to exchange data across the network. In order to facilitate communication within the network, a routing protocol is used to discover routes between nodes. The primary goal of such an ad hoc network routing protocol is correct and efficient route establishment between a pair of nodes so that messages may be delivered in a timely manner. Route construction should be done with a minimum of overhead and bandwidth consumption. This paper examines two routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks– the Destination Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV), the table- driven protocol and the Ad hoc On- Demand Distance Vector routing (AODV), an On –Demand protocol and evaluates both protocols based on packet delivery fraction, normalized routing load, average delay and throughput while varying number of nodes, speed and pause time.
This compare and evaluate two routing protocols DSR and CBRP in ad hoc networks. DSR is based on flat topology and CBRP is of cluster based. Both are compared in different number of scenarios and their performances are compared in terms of pdf, channel utilization, nrl, average end to end delay and control overheads.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
Search and Society: Reimagining Information Access for Radical FuturesBhaskar Mitra
The field of Information retrieval (IR) is currently undergoing a transformative shift, at least partly due to the emerging applications of generative AI to information access. In this talk, we will deliberate on the sociotechnical implications of generative AI for information access. We will argue that there is both a critical necessity and an exciting opportunity for the IR community to re-center our research agendas on societal needs while dismantling the artificial separation between the work on fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in IR and the rest of IR research. Instead of adopting a reactionary strategy of trying to mitigate potential social harms from emerging technologies, the community should aim to proactively set the research agenda for the kinds of systems we should build inspired by diverse explicitly stated sociotechnical imaginaries. The sociotechnical imaginaries that underpin the design and development of information access technologies needs to be explicitly articulated, and we need to develop theories of change in context of these diverse perspectives. Our guiding future imaginaries must be informed by other academic fields, such as democratic theory and critical theory, and should be co-developed with social science scholars, legal scholars, civil rights and social justice activists, and artists, among others.
Let's dive deeper into the world of ODC! Ricardo Alves (OutSystems) will join us to tell all about the new Data Fabric. After that, Sezen de Bruijn (OutSystems) will get into the details on how to best design a sturdy architecture within ODC.
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
Builder.ai Founder Sachin Dev Duggal's Strategic Approach to Create an Innova...Ramesh Iyer
In today's fast-changing business world, Companies that adapt and embrace new ideas often need help to keep up with the competition. However, fostering a culture of innovation takes much work. It takes vision, leadership and willingness to take risks in the right proportion. Sachin Dev Duggal, co-founder of Builder.ai, has perfected the art of this balance, creating a company culture where creativity and growth are nurtured at each stage.
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Tobias Schneck
As AI technology is pushing into IT I was wondering myself, as an “infrastructure container kubernetes guy”, how get this fancy AI technology get managed from an infrastructure operational view? Is it possible to apply our lovely cloud native principals as well? What benefit’s both technologies could bring to each other?
Let me take this questions and provide you a short journey through existing deployment models and use cases for AI software. On practical examples, we discuss what cloud/on-premise strategy we may need for applying it to our own infrastructure to get it to work from an enterprise perspective. I want to give an overview about infrastructure requirements and technologies, what could be beneficial or limiting your AI use cases in an enterprise environment. An interactive Demo will give you some insides, what approaches I got already working for real.
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualityInflectra
In this insightful webinar, Inflectra explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming software development and testing. Discover how AI-powered tools are revolutionizing every stage of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), from design and prototyping to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
Learn about:
• The Future of Testing: How AI is shifting testing towards verification, analysis, and higher-level skills, while reducing repetitive tasks.
• Test Automation: How AI-powered test case generation, optimization, and self-healing tests are making testing more efficient and effective.
• Visual Testing: Explore the emerging capabilities of AI in visual testing and how it's set to revolutionize UI verification.
• Inflectra's AI Solutions: See demonstrations of Inflectra's cutting-edge AI tools like the ChatGPT plugin and Azure Open AI platform, designed to streamline your testing process.
Whether you're a developer, tester, or QA professional, this webinar will give you valuable insights into how AI is shaping the future of software delivery.
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...
Performance Comparison of AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Wireless Networks
1. 25
International Conference on Advanced Communication Systems, January 10 - 12, 2007, GCT, Coimbatore. ICACS - 2007
Performance Comparison of AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc
Wireless Networks
1
Narendra Singh Yadav 2
Dr. R.P.Yadav
1 Department of ECE, The Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur
Email: narensinghyadav@yahoo.com
2 Department of ECE, The Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur
Email : rpyadav@mnit.ac.in
ABSTRACT
An ad hoc network is a collection of mobile nodes
communicating through wireless channels without any existing
network infrastructure or centralized administration. Because of
the limited transmission range of wireless network interfaces,
multiple “hops” may be needed to exchange data across the
network. Consequently, many routing algorithms have come into
existence to satisfy the needs of communications in such networks.
This paper presents performance comparison of the three routing
protocols AODV and DSDV. Protocols were simulated using the
ns-2 and were compared in terms of packet delivery fraction,
normalized routing load and average delay, while varying number
of nodes, and pause time. Simulation revealed that although DSDV
perfectly scales to small networks with low node speeds, AODV is
preferred due to its more efficient use of bandwidth.
Keywords:
Ad-Hoc Wireless Networks, AODV, DSDV, Ns-2
I.INTRODUCTION
Advances in computer and telecommunication
industries have made wireless networks increasingly popular.
Basically, there are two types of systems for wireless networks.
One is the base-station (BS) oriented that is cellular (one hop)
networks [1]. In BS- oriented wireless networks the mobile hosts
communicate with base station. The presence of BS simplifies
routing and resource management as the routing decisions are made
in a centralized manner with more information about the destination
node. The BS- oriented wireless network has better performance
and is more reliable
The other is the ad hoc (multihop) wireless networks
[2]. Ad hoc wireless networks (formerly called packet radio
networks) are defined as mobile distributed multihop wireless
networks. In ad hoc wireless networks there is no predetermined
topology (pre existing fixed infrastructure) and no central control.
The nodes in ad hoc communicate without wired connections
among themselves by creating a network “on the fly”. The absence
of any central control makes the routing a complex.Ad hoc wireless
network topology is more desirable because of its low cost, ease
and speed of deployment and flexibility.
Routing is a core problem in networks for delivering
data from one node to another. Ad hoc wireless networks have
special limitations and properties [3]. Therefore, routing protocols
for wired networks cannot be directly used in ad hoc wireless
networks; routing protocols for ad hoc wireless networks need to
be designed and implemented separately.
Routing protocols for ad hoc wireless networks can be
classified into two main categories: Proactive or table driven routing
protocols and Reactive or on-demand routing protocols.
To judge the merit of a routing protocol, one needs
metrics- both quantitative and qualitative- with which to measure
its suitability and performance [3]. These metrics should be
independent of any given routing protocol.
Dozens of routing protocols have been introduced [4],
all of which typically perform well in some situations while having
significant weaknesses in other cases. So the open problem lies in
that no one single routing algorithm/ protocol is suitable for
heterogeneity of ad hoc networks [3]. And this limitation could
not be solved without advanced computer and wireless
communication technology development specially hardware
evolution.
The paper is organized as follows: in Section II, a brief
description of routing protocols discussed in this work are
presented, in Section III the parameters of simulation and the
scenario are shown, in Section IV the simulation results are plotted
and argued, in Section V some conclusions are discussed.
II.DESCRIPTIONOFPROTOCOLS
Destination Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV)
DSDV, an enhanced version of the distributed ellman-
Ford algorithm, belongs to the proactive or table driven family
where a correct route to any node in the network is always
maintained and updated [5].
In DSDV, each node maintains a routing table that
contains the shortest distance and the first node on the shortest
path to every other node in the network. A sequence number
created by the destination node tags each entry to prevent loops,
to counter the count –to-infinity problem and for faster
convergence.Thetablesareexchangedbetweenneighborsatregular
intervals to keep an up to date view of the network topology. The
tables are also forwarded if a node finds a significant change in
local topology. This exchange of table imposes a large overhead on
the whole network. To reduce this potential traffic, routing updates
are classified into two categories. The first is known as “full dump”
which includes all available routing information. This type of
updates should be used as infrequently as possible and only in the
2. 26
International Conference on Advanced Communication Systems, January 10 - 12, 2007, GCT, Coimbatore. ICACS - 2007
cases of complete topology change. In the cases of occasional
movements, smaller “incremental” updates are sent carrying only
information about changes since the last full dump. Each of these
updates should fit in a single Network Protocol Data Unit (NPDU),
and thus significantly decreasing the amount of traffic. Table
updates are initiated by a destination with a new sequence number
which is always greater than the previous one. Upon receiving an
updated table a node either updates its tables based on the received
information or holds it for some time to select the best metric
received from multiple versions of the same update from different
neighbors.
Ad hoc On-demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV)
AODV [6][7] is an improvement on the DSDV.AODV
uses an on- demand approach for finding routes. Since it is an on
- demand algorithm, a route is established only when it is required
by a source node for transmitting data packets and it maintains
these routes as long as they are needed by the sources.
AODV uses a destination sequence number, created by
the destination, to determine an up to date path to the destination.
A node updates its route information only if the destination
sequence number of the current received packet is greater than the
destination sequence number stored at the node. It indicates the
freshness of the route accepted by the source. To prevent multiple
broadcast of the same packet AODV uses broadcast identifier
number that ensure loop freedom since the intermediate nodes
only forward the first copy of the same packet and discard the
duplicate copies.
To find a path to the destination, the source broadcasts
a Route Request (RREQ) packet across the network. This RREQ
contains the source identifier, the destination identifier, the source
sequence number, the destination sequence number, the broadcast
identifier and the time to live field. Nodes that receives RREQ
either if they are the destination or if they have a fresh route to the
destination, can respond to the RREQ by unicasting a Route Reply
(RREP) back to the source node. Otherwise, the node rebroadcasts
the RREQ.
When a node forwards a RREQ packet to its neighbors,
it also records in its tables the node from which the first copy of
the request came. This information is used to construct the reverse
path for the RREP packet. AODV uses only symmetric links
because the route reply packet follows the reverse path of route
request packet. When a node receives a RREP packet, information
about the previous node from which the packet was received is
also stored in order to forward the data packets to this next node
as the next hop toward the destination. Once the source node
receives a RREP it can begin using the route to send data packets.
The source node rebroadcasts the RREQ if it does not
receive a RREP before the timer expires. It attempts discovery up
to some maximum number of attempts. If it does not discover a
route after this maximum number of attempts, the session is
aborted.
If the source moves then it can reinitiate route discovery
to the destination. If one of the intermediate nodes move then the
moved nodes neighbor realizes the link failure and sends a link
failure notification to its upstream neighbors and so on till it reaches
the source upon which the source can reinitiate route discovery if
needed.
III.SIMULATIONMODEL
For the purpose of a performance comparison detailed
performance simulations are performed for three main ad hoc
routing protocols i.e.AODV and DSDV. The simulations are done
using ns-2 [8].
The Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) of IEEE
802.11 for wireless LANs is used as the MAC layer protocol. An
unslotted carrier sense multiple access (CSMA) technique with
collision avoidance (CSMA/CA) is used to transmit the data
packets. The radio model uses characteristics similar to a
commercial radio interface, Lucent’s WaveLAN. WaveLAN is
modeled as a shared media radio with a nominal bit rate of 2 Mb/
s and a nominal radio range of 250m.
The protocols maintain a send buffer of 64 packets. It
contains all data packets waiting for a route, such as packets for
which route discovery has started, but no reply has arrived yet.
To prevent buffering of packets indefinitely, packets are dropped
if they wait in the send buffer for more than 30s.All packets (both
data and routing) sent by the routing layer are queued at the interface
queue until the MAC layer can transmit them. The interface queue
has a maximum size of 50 packets and is maintained as a priority
queue with two priori-ties each served in FIFO order. Routing
packets get higher priority than data packets.
Traffic Pattern
Continuous bit rate (CBR) traffic sources are used.
Only 512-byte data packets are used.All communication patterns
were peer-to-peer, and connections were started at times
uniformly distributed between 0 and 100 seconds. TCP sources
was avoided because TCP offers a conforming load to the
network, meaning that it changes the times at which it sends
packets based on its perception of the networks ability to carry
packets.
Traffic is generated using the following parameters:
Traffic Type : CBR
No of nodes : 50
No of sources: 15, 30, 45 sources
Rate: 4 packets per second for 15 and 30 sources, 3 packets per
sec for 45 sources
Movement Model
The node movement generator of ns-2 is used to
generate node movement scenarios. The parameters this
movement generator takes as input are number of nodes, pause
time, maximum speed, field configuration and simulation time.
The parameter, which is of primary importance, is pause time.
Pause time basically determines the mobility rate of the model,
as pause time increases the mobility rate decreases.
At the start of the simulations nodes are assigned some
random position within the specified field configuration, for pause
3. 27
International Conference on Advanced Communication Systems, January 10 - 12, 2007, GCT, Coimbatore. ICACS - 2007
time seconds nodes stay at that position and after that they make
a random movement to some other position. The movement speed
is uniformly distributed between 0 and maximum speed.
The following parameter values are used forgenerating
various mobility models:
Number of nodes: 50 nodes
Pause times: 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 seconds
Maximum speed: 20 m/s
Field configuration: 500 X 500
Simulation time: 100 seconds.
Performance Metrics
The following performance metrics are evaluated:
•Packet delivery ratio The ratio of the data packets delivered to
the destinations to those generated by the CBR sources.
•Averageend-to-enddelay Thisincludesallpossibledelayscaused
by buffering during route discovery latency, queuing at the interface
queue, retransmission delays at the MAC, and propagation and
transfer times.
•Normalized routing load the number of routing packets
“transmitted” per data packet “delivered” at the destination
IV.PERFORMANCERESULTS
The simulation results are shown in the following
section in the form of line graphs. Graphs show comparison
between the two protocols by varying different numbers of
sources on the basis of the above-mentioned metrics as a function
of pause time.
Packet Delivery Fraction
Figure 1 show a comparison between both the routing protocols
on the basis of packet delivery fraction using a different number of
traffic sources.
Packet delivery fraction of protocols for 15 sources
Packet delivery fraction of protocols for 30 sources
Packet delivery fraction of protocols for 45 sources
Fig. 1. Packet delivery fraction for the 50-node model with
various numbers of sources.
Both of the protocols deliver a greater percentage of the
originateddatapacketswhenthereislittlenodemobility,converging
to 100% delivery ration when there is no node motion.
The On-demand protocol, AODV performed
particularly well, delivering almost 100% of the data packets
regardless of the mobility rate. The packet delivery of AODV is
almost independent of the number of sources that is varying number
of sources does not effect AODV that much.
DSDV performance is worst when mobility is high.
This poor performance is because of the reason that DSDV is not
a On demand protocol and it keeps only one route per destination,
therefore lack of alternate routes and presence of stale routes in
the routing table when nodes are moving at higher rate leads to
packet drops. The packet delivery of DSDV protocol depends on
the number of sources, as it is obvious from figure 1.
Average end to end delay of protocols for 15 sources
Average end to end delay of protocols for 30 sources
4. 28
International Conference on Advanced Communication Systems, January 10 - 12, 2007, GCT, Coimbatore. ICACS - 2007
Average end to end delay of protocols for 45 sources
Fig. 2. Average End to End Delay for the 50-node model with
various numbers of sources
DSDV performed pretty stable and the delay kept
about 0.04 seconds when pause time increased from 0 seconds
to 100 second. The reason is that it is a table driven protocol, so
a node does not need to find a route before transmitting packets.
So the delay is quite stable.
For AODV the delay is much more then the DSDV. As
AODV is On-demand protocol, with an increased number of
sources and high mobility there are more link failures therefore
there are more route discoveries.AODV takes more time duringthe
route discovery process as first it finds the route hop by hop and
then it gets back to the source by back tracking that route.All this
leads to delays in the delivery of data packets.
Normalized Routing Load
Figure 3 show a comparison between both the routing
protocols on the basis of normalized routing load using a different
number of sources.
Normalized routing load of protocols for 15 sources
Normalized routing load of protocols for 30 sources
Normalized routing load of protocols for 45 sources
Fig 3. Normalized routing load for the 50-node model with
various numbers of sources
As DSDV is a table driven routing protocol its overhead
is almost the same with respect to node mobility.
In cases of AODV, as the pause time increases, route
stability increases, resulting in a decreased number of routing packet
routing packet transmissions, and therefore a decrease in the routing
overhead.Arelatively stable normalized routing load is a desirable
property for scalability of the protocols,
V.CONCLUSION
This paper compared the two ad hoc routing protocols.
AODV a On – Demand routing protocol, and DSDV a table driven
protocol.
Simulation results show that both of the protocols deliver
a greater percentage of the originated data packets when there is
little node mobility, converging to 100% delivery ration when
there is no node motion. The packet delivery of AODV almost
independent of the number of sources. DSDV generates less routing
load then AODV. AODV suffers from end to end delays. DSDV
packet delivery fraction is very low for high mobility scenarios.
REFERENCES
[1] T.S.Rappaport, “wireless communications- principles and
practice”, Second Edition, Pearson Education.
[2] C.Siva Ram and B.S.Manoj, “Ad hoc wireless networks:
Architectures and protocols”, second edition, Pearson education.
[3] S.Corson and J.Macher, “Mobile ad hoc networking
(MANET): Routing Protocol Performance issues and evaluation
considerations” Internet RFC 2501.
[4] E.M.Royer and C.K.Toh, “A review of current routing
protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks”, IEEE Personal
Communications Magazine, pp. 46-55, April 1999.
[5] C.E. Perkins & P. Bhagwat, Highly Dynamic Destination-
Sequenced Distance Vector Routing (DSDV) for Mobile
Computers, Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM’94, London, UK,
Sep. 1994, pp. 234-244.
[6] C.E. Perkins, E.M. Royer & S. Das, Ad Hoc On Demand
Distance Vector (AODV) Routing, IETF Internet draft, draft-ietf-
manet-aodv-08.txt, March 2001.
[7] C.E. Perkins & E.M. Royer, Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance
Vector Routing, Proceedings of the 2nd IEEEWorkshop on Mobile
Computing Systems andApplications, New Orleans, LA, February
1999, pp. 90- 100.
[8] K. Fall & K. Vardhan, The Network Simulator (ns-2)Available
Online: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns