This document summarizes findings from time use surveys conducted in Finland. It finds that: 1) Response rates were higher for telephone interviews (62%) than face-to-face interviews (58%), but total non-response was lower for telephone interviews. 2) There were no significant differences in diary quality or number of activities reported between face-to-face and telephone interviews. 3) A light paper diary pilot survey had a very low response rate of 17.4% and differences compared to full surveys, suggesting interviewer assistance is needed for quality and response.