Reconstructing Historicism
Paper No: 2 (Literary Theory)
Enrollment No: 2069112220170004
Course: M.Phil
Submitted to: Department of English
MKBU
Submitted by: Dipti Vaghela
What is Reconstructing Historicism?
• It is a literary theory based on the idea that
literature should be studied and interpreted
within the context of both the history of the
author and the history of the critic.
• It is new inside to look history through new
type of theory or angel.
• This term introduced by Stephen Greenblatt in
1980. Afterwards it goes on spreading during
the same decade.
• He wrote in his book, context is replaced by
co-text and non-literary text from the same
time period.
• It means we have to observed that time
through non-literary texts also.
It is new inside as compare to old way
of looking literary texts
Generally in old period, we were
looking just esthetics value of the works like,
-themes
-characters
-plot
-moral, etc.
But, now a days we are looking
through many other glasses of various
theories. So, that we call new historicism.
Michel Foucault
• His theory of collective cultural knowledge,
documents in order to understand that
particular time.
• Its aims at interpreting a literary text as an
expression of or reaction to the power-
structures of the surrounding society.
• For example ‘The Purpose’ by T.P. Kailasam.
• A tempest and The tempest.
Deals with these many words
• Circulation
• Context
• Hegemony
• Ideology
• History
• Power
Examples of power structure
• Every government and society talk about poor
or marginalized people. In literature also
people like Bakha in Untouchable, Gangu in
Two leaves and a Bud, Munoo in Coolie,
Velutha in The God of small things and many
other always suffer.
Relationship to other Movements
• It is related to Cultural studies, which is a
broader movement in the humanities and
social science.
• It emphasizes that individual experience is
culturally specific, rather than universal.
• So, after all these both are inter related.
Camille Pagalia
• The New historicism coming out of Berkeley.
• New historicism is “a refuse of English majors
without critical talent or broad learning in
history or political science, lack of historical
sense”.
Conclusion
• Thus, New historicism is nothing but the word
of the past replaced the world of the past.
• Or the aim is not to represent the past as it
really was, but to present a new reality by re-
situating it.
• Thus, after all we can’t conclude anything that
which is truth about history because it is only
spoken by survivors.
Work Cited
Waugh, Patricia. "Reconstructing Historicism."
Literary theory and criticism. n.d. 386-403.
Thanks for listening

New historicism

  • 1.
    Reconstructing Historicism Paper No:2 (Literary Theory) Enrollment No: 2069112220170004 Course: M.Phil Submitted to: Department of English MKBU Submitted by: Dipti Vaghela
  • 2.
    What is ReconstructingHistoricism? • It is a literary theory based on the idea that literature should be studied and interpreted within the context of both the history of the author and the history of the critic. • It is new inside to look history through new type of theory or angel.
  • 3.
    • This termintroduced by Stephen Greenblatt in 1980. Afterwards it goes on spreading during the same decade. • He wrote in his book, context is replaced by co-text and non-literary text from the same time period. • It means we have to observed that time through non-literary texts also.
  • 4.
    It is newinside as compare to old way of looking literary texts Generally in old period, we were looking just esthetics value of the works like, -themes -characters -plot -moral, etc. But, now a days we are looking through many other glasses of various theories. So, that we call new historicism.
  • 5.
    Michel Foucault • Histheory of collective cultural knowledge, documents in order to understand that particular time. • Its aims at interpreting a literary text as an expression of or reaction to the power- structures of the surrounding society. • For example ‘The Purpose’ by T.P. Kailasam. • A tempest and The tempest.
  • 6.
    Deals with thesemany words • Circulation • Context • Hegemony • Ideology • History • Power
  • 7.
    Examples of powerstructure • Every government and society talk about poor or marginalized people. In literature also people like Bakha in Untouchable, Gangu in Two leaves and a Bud, Munoo in Coolie, Velutha in The God of small things and many other always suffer.
  • 8.
    Relationship to otherMovements • It is related to Cultural studies, which is a broader movement in the humanities and social science. • It emphasizes that individual experience is culturally specific, rather than universal. • So, after all these both are inter related.
  • 9.
    Camille Pagalia • TheNew historicism coming out of Berkeley. • New historicism is “a refuse of English majors without critical talent or broad learning in history or political science, lack of historical sense”.
  • 10.
    Conclusion • Thus, Newhistoricism is nothing but the word of the past replaced the world of the past. • Or the aim is not to represent the past as it really was, but to present a new reality by re- situating it. • Thus, after all we can’t conclude anything that which is truth about history because it is only spoken by survivors.
  • 11.
    Work Cited Waugh, Patricia."Reconstructing Historicism." Literary theory and criticism. n.d. 386-403.
  • 12.