Douglas McGregor proposed two theories - Theory X and Theory Y - about human motivation in the workplace. Theory X assumes employees dislike work and need close supervision, while Theory Y assumes employees can be self-motivated and exercise autonomy. Victor Vroom later developed Expectancy Theory, which proposes that motivation depends on the expectation that effort will lead to good performance and rewards. Motivation equals valence (preference for a reward) multiplied by expectancy (belief that actions will lead to outcomes) multiplied by instrumentality (belief that good performance will lead to rewards).
Expectancy theory is a mental process regarding the selection of choices. It’s a motivation theory first proposed by Victor Vroom of the Yale school of management. It;s pros and con.
The expectancy theory was proposed by Victor Vroom of Yale School of Management in 1964. Vroom stresses and focuses on outcomes, and not on needs unlike Maslow and Herzberg. The theory states that the intensity of a tendency to perform in a particular manner is dependent on the intensity of an expectation that the performance will be followed by a definite outcome and on the appeal of the outcome to the individual.
The Expectancy theory states that employee’s motivation is an outcome of how much an individual wants a reward (Valence), the assessment that the likelihood that the effort will lead to expected performance (Expectancy) and the belief that the performance will lead to reward (Instrumentality). In short, Valence is the significance associated by an individual about the expected outcome. It is an expected and not the actual satisfaction that an employee expects to receive after achieving the goals. Expectancy is the faith that better efforts will result in better performance. Expectancy is influenced by factors such as possession of appropriate skills for performing the job, availability of right resources, availability of crucial information and getting the required support for completing the job.
Instrumentality is the faith that if you perform well, then a valid outcome will be there. Instrumentality is affected by factors such as believe in the people who decide who receives what outcome, the simplicity of the process deciding who gets what outcome, and clarity of relationship between performance and outcomes. Thus, the expectancy theory concentrates on the following three relationships:
• Effort-performance relationship: What is the likelihood that the individual’s effort be recognized in his performance appraisal?
• Performance-reward relationship: It talks about the extent to which the employee believes that getting a good performance appraisal leads to organizational rewards.
• Rewards-personal goals relationship: It is all about the attractiveness or appeal of the potential reward to the individual.
Vroom was of view that employees consciously decide whether to perform or not at the job. This decision solely depended on the employee’s motivation level which in turn depends on three factors of expectancy, valence and instrumentality.
Expectancy theory is a mental process regarding the selection of choices. It’s a motivation theory first proposed by Victor Vroom of the Yale school of management. It;s pros and con.
The expectancy theory was proposed by Victor Vroom of Yale School of Management in 1964. Vroom stresses and focuses on outcomes, and not on needs unlike Maslow and Herzberg. The theory states that the intensity of a tendency to perform in a particular manner is dependent on the intensity of an expectation that the performance will be followed by a definite outcome and on the appeal of the outcome to the individual.
The Expectancy theory states that employee’s motivation is an outcome of how much an individual wants a reward (Valence), the assessment that the likelihood that the effort will lead to expected performance (Expectancy) and the belief that the performance will lead to reward (Instrumentality). In short, Valence is the significance associated by an individual about the expected outcome. It is an expected and not the actual satisfaction that an employee expects to receive after achieving the goals. Expectancy is the faith that better efforts will result in better performance. Expectancy is influenced by factors such as possession of appropriate skills for performing the job, availability of right resources, availability of crucial information and getting the required support for completing the job.
Instrumentality is the faith that if you perform well, then a valid outcome will be there. Instrumentality is affected by factors such as believe in the people who decide who receives what outcome, the simplicity of the process deciding who gets what outcome, and clarity of relationship between performance and outcomes. Thus, the expectancy theory concentrates on the following three relationships:
• Effort-performance relationship: What is the likelihood that the individual’s effort be recognized in his performance appraisal?
• Performance-reward relationship: It talks about the extent to which the employee believes that getting a good performance appraisal leads to organizational rewards.
• Rewards-personal goals relationship: It is all about the attractiveness or appeal of the potential reward to the individual.
Vroom was of view that employees consciously decide whether to perform or not at the job. This decision solely depended on the employee’s motivation level which in turn depends on three factors of expectancy, valence and instrumentality.
Expectancy theory is a mental process regarding the selection of choices. It’s a motivation theory first proposed by Victor Vroom of the Yale school of management.
It;s pros and con.
Victor H. Vroom
Is a business school professor at the Yale School of Management.
He holds a PhD from University of Michigan.
Vroom's primary research was on the expectancy theory of motivation, which attempts to explain why individuals choose to follow certain courses of action in organizations, particularly in decision-making and leadership
His most well-known books are Work and Motivation, Leadership and Decision Making and The New Leadership.
Expectancy Theory
Expectancy theory proposes that a individual will decide to behave or act in a certain way because they are motivated to select a specific behaviour over other behaviours due to what they expect the result of that selected behaviour will be.
In essence, the motivation of the behaviour selection is determined by the desirability of the outcome. However, at the core of the theory is the cognitive process of how an individual processes the different motivational elements. This is done before making the ultimate choice. The outcome is not the sole determining factor in making the decision of how to behave.
Expectancy theory is about the mental processes regarding choice, or choosing. It explains the processes that an individual undergoes to make choices. In the study of organizational behavior, expectancy theory is a motivation theory first proposed by Victor Vroom of the Yale School of Management.
Expectancy Theory
This theory emphasizes the needs for organizations to relate rewards directly to performance and
to ensure that the rewards provided are those rewards deserved and wanted by the recipients.
Victor H. Vroom defines motivation as a process governing choices among alternative forms of
voluntary activities, a process controlled by the individual. The individual makes choices based on
estimates of how well the expected results of a given behaviour are going to match up with or
eventually lead to the desired results. Motivation is a product of the individual’s expectancy that a
certain effort will lead to the intended performance, the instrumentality of this performance to
achieving a certain result, and the desirability of this result for the individual, known as valence.
Difference from the content theories of Maslow,Alderfer,Herzberg and McClelland
Vroom’s expectancy theory differs from the content theories of Maslow, Alderfer, Herzberg, and
McClelland in that Vroom’s expectancy theory does not provide specific suggestions on what
motivates organization members. Instead, Vroom’s theory provides a process of cognitive variables
that reflects individual differences in work motivation.
Need theories of motivation (Alderfer, 1972; Herzberg, 1968; Maslow, 1970; McClelland, 1976)
attempt to explain what motivates people in the workplace. Expectancy theory is more concerned
with the cognitive antecedents that go into motivation and the way they relate to each other.
Frederick herzberg’s two factor theory of motivation critiquekdore
ounder of this two factor theory is Fredrick Herzberg. He conducted a study on about 200 accountants and engineers because of their growing importance in the business world, from different industries in the Pittsburgh area of America. He asked mainly two questions, what turned you on & what turned you off. Then he realized two types of factors which affect to this matter. One set of factors are those which, if absent, cause dissatisfaction. And the other set of factors are those which, if present, serve to motivate the individual to superior effort and performance. its advantages & disadvantages
Expectancy theory is a mental process regarding the selection of choices. It’s a motivation theory first proposed by Victor Vroom of the Yale school of management.
It;s pros and con.
Victor H. Vroom
Is a business school professor at the Yale School of Management.
He holds a PhD from University of Michigan.
Vroom's primary research was on the expectancy theory of motivation, which attempts to explain why individuals choose to follow certain courses of action in organizations, particularly in decision-making and leadership
His most well-known books are Work and Motivation, Leadership and Decision Making and The New Leadership.
Expectancy Theory
Expectancy theory proposes that a individual will decide to behave or act in a certain way because they are motivated to select a specific behaviour over other behaviours due to what they expect the result of that selected behaviour will be.
In essence, the motivation of the behaviour selection is determined by the desirability of the outcome. However, at the core of the theory is the cognitive process of how an individual processes the different motivational elements. This is done before making the ultimate choice. The outcome is not the sole determining factor in making the decision of how to behave.
Expectancy theory is about the mental processes regarding choice, or choosing. It explains the processes that an individual undergoes to make choices. In the study of organizational behavior, expectancy theory is a motivation theory first proposed by Victor Vroom of the Yale School of Management.
Expectancy Theory
This theory emphasizes the needs for organizations to relate rewards directly to performance and
to ensure that the rewards provided are those rewards deserved and wanted by the recipients.
Victor H. Vroom defines motivation as a process governing choices among alternative forms of
voluntary activities, a process controlled by the individual. The individual makes choices based on
estimates of how well the expected results of a given behaviour are going to match up with or
eventually lead to the desired results. Motivation is a product of the individual’s expectancy that a
certain effort will lead to the intended performance, the instrumentality of this performance to
achieving a certain result, and the desirability of this result for the individual, known as valence.
Difference from the content theories of Maslow,Alderfer,Herzberg and McClelland
Vroom’s expectancy theory differs from the content theories of Maslow, Alderfer, Herzberg, and
McClelland in that Vroom’s expectancy theory does not provide specific suggestions on what
motivates organization members. Instead, Vroom’s theory provides a process of cognitive variables
that reflects individual differences in work motivation.
Need theories of motivation (Alderfer, 1972; Herzberg, 1968; Maslow, 1970; McClelland, 1976)
attempt to explain what motivates people in the workplace. Expectancy theory is more concerned
with the cognitive antecedents that go into motivation and the way they relate to each other.
Frederick herzberg’s two factor theory of motivation critiquekdore
ounder of this two factor theory is Fredrick Herzberg. He conducted a study on about 200 accountants and engineers because of their growing importance in the business world, from different industries in the Pittsburgh area of America. He asked mainly two questions, what turned you on & what turned you off. Then he realized two types of factors which affect to this matter. One set of factors are those which, if absent, cause dissatisfaction. And the other set of factors are those which, if present, serve to motivate the individual to superior effort and performance. its advantages & disadvantages
Theories of Motivation - Overview of the Content Theories of Motivation Monica P
(MST) Advanced Administration and Supervision in Educational Practices
(class report(s)/discussion(s))
DISCLAIMER: I do not claim ownership of the photos, videos, templates, and etc used in this slideshow
Motivation is an action that stimulates an individual to take a course of action, which will result in an attainment of goals, or satisfaction of certain material or psychological needs of the individual. Motivation is a powerful tool in the hands of leaders. It can persuade convince and propel people to act.
Cognitive Process Theories of MotivationFew of us would deny th.docxmonicafrancis71118
Cognitive Process Theories of Motivation
Few of us would deny that our conscious thoughts play a role in how we
behave. A second group of motivation theories, called cognitive process theories,
recognizes this and argues that motivation is based on a person’s thoughts and
beliefs (or cognitions). These theories are sometimes referred to as process theo-
ries because they attempt to explain the sequence of thoughts and decisions that
energize, direct, and control behavior.
Cognitive motivation theories have direct relevance to HRD. Most HRD
programs include attempts to change employee behavior by influencing their
thoughts, beliefs, and attitudes. Learning, which lies at the heart of HRD, is
often seen as a cognitive process (learning is discussed in Chapter 3). We can
do a better job of designing and implementing HRD programs if we understand
how employees’ thoughts and beliefs affect their behavior. In the following sec-
tion, we briefly review four cognitive theories of motivation: expectancy theory,
goal-setting theory, social learning theory, and equity theory. Each theory has
relevance for the practice of HRD.
Expectancy Theory. Expectancy theory, first proposed by Victor Vroom, assumes
that motivation is a conscious choice process.57 According to this theory, people
choose to put their effort into activities they believe they can perform that will
produce desired outcomes. Expectancy theory argues that decisions about which
activities to engage in are based on the combination of three sets of beliefs: expec-
tancy, instrumentality, and valence.
Expectancy beliefs reflect an individual’s judgment of whether applying (or
increasing) effort to a task will result in its successful accomplishment. Stated
another way, people with high expectancy believe that increased effort will lead
to better performance, but people with low expectancy do not believe that their
efforts, no matter how great, will affect their performance. All things being equal,
people should engage in tasks for which they have high expectancy beliefs.
The second belief, instrumentality, is a judgment about the connection the
individual perceives (if any) between task performance and possible outcomes.
Making an instrumentality judgment entails asking the question, “If I perform
this task successfully, is it likely to get me something I want (or something I
don’t want)?” Instrumentality ranges from strongly positive (the individual is cer-
tain that performing a task will lead to a particular outcome), through zero (the
individual is certain there is no relationship between performing the task and the
occurrence of a particular outcome), to strongly negative (the individual is cer-
tain that performing a certain task will prevent a particular outcome from
occurring).
The third belief important to expectancy theory is valence. Valence refers to the
value the person places on a particular outcome. Valence judgments range from
strongl.
A short notes on these
1.Maslow’s Hierarchy Needs Model
2. Herzberg’s Two Factor Theory Of Motivation
3. Theory X and Theory Y
4. McClelland’s Theory of Needs
5. Alderfer’s Erg Theory
6. Reinforcement Theory
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
motivation theory
1.
2. A.Douglas McGregor’s Theory
‘X’and Theory ‘Y’
Introduction:
• Created and developed by Douglas mcGregor
(1960’s).
• Used in human resources,organisation behavior
analysis and organisational development.
• Pertains to human motivation.
• Describe two different attitudes towards workforce
motivation.
3. 1.Theory ‘X’
Pessimistic assumptions.
Impediment to employee morale and productivity.
Assumptions:
This theory is based on the following fundamental
assumptions:
Employees are:
lazy and will avoide work.
In need of close supervision.
Employees:
Have little ambition without incentive programes.
Avoide responcibilities.
Need to be driven through control system.
4. Manager Adopting Theory ‘X’ Believes:
Every thing ends in blame.
In blamingwithout evaluating the situation.
That it is the their job to structure the work
and energise the employee.
In authoritarian style basedon the threat of
punishment.
5. Theory ‘Y’:
Positive assumptions.
More positive view of workers and the possiblities
that creat enthusiasm.
Assumptions:
This theory is based of following assumptions:
Employees are:
Self motivated andanxious to accept greater
responsibility.
Employee:
Exercise self-control,self-direction,autonomy and
empowerment.
Exercise creativity and become forward looking.
6. Manager Adopting Theory ‘Y’ Believes:
People want to do well at work.
The employees are a pool of unused
creativity.
That the satisfaction of doing a job is in
itself motivating.
8. Conclusion:
These theories help future generations
understand the changing dynamics of
human behavior.
Represent two unrealistic extremes.
Guiding principles of management
9. B.Vroom’s expectancy theory:
It is one of the motivation theory
It says that individual have different sets
of goals and can be motivated if they
have certain expectations.
It is about the choice ,it explains the
processes that an individual undergoes
to make choices.
First proposed by ‘Victor Vroom’ of the
‘Yale School of Management’
10. Continuous:
This say that an employee at work will
be motivated to exert a high level of
effort.
When he believes that effort will lead
to a good performance measurement
that ultimately leads to organizational
rewards.
Like bonus,promotion,which will
satisfy his personal goals.
11. Continuous:
Vroom introduces three variables
withinthe expectancy theory which are:
1. Expectancy.
2. Instrumentality.
3. valence
Motivation=Valence x Expectancy x instrumentality
12. Valence:
Strength of a person’s preference for an
outcome or reward .
Example:
If an employee wants promotion,it has high valence.
It is an expression for a desire for achieving a goal.
It arises from internal self and is conditioned by
experiences.
13. Expectancy:
Strength of belief that particular action
will lead to a particular outcome.
This expactency of performance may be
thought of in term of probabilities ranging
from 0 to 1.
14. Instrumentality:
It si the belief that you perform well that
a valued outcome will received.
This reward come in the form of pay
increase,promtion.
Instrumentality is low when the reward is
given for all performances given.