1

Enterprise-wide BPR for a leading
Indian auto manufacturer.
The Assam Kaziranga University- School Of Business.
Business Challenge
2

 Mahindra Satyam was the Market Leader for

Decades.
 However, of late, there was tremendous
competition it faced in several product categories.
 REASON: Increasing Globalization, Entry of
foreign companies, Import of pre-used vehicles.
Mahindra Satyam’s Solution
3

 BPR program in 3 broad phases:
 LONG TERM BUSINESS STRATEGY Identifying new business opportunities and
capitalizing on them.
 Strategy to survive via Diversification and adaption
to growing changes.
 Mahindra Satyam was expected to leverage its
current capabilities in the new markets. A market
penetration strategy.
4



PROCESS CENTRIC ENTERPRISE (Phase I) Preparing to migrate into PCE wherein, each process
would be identified and a strategy to migrate shall be
constructed.
 Senior managers made responsible for all round
performance of these processes.
 Process goals identified and fixed.
 Process framework made to be owned by respective
senior managers.
 Strategies constructed in a way employees could
understand the need for change and its impact.
PROCESS CENTRIC ENTERPRISE (Phase II) Transformation phase wherein, each key business
5
process was redesigned and adopted.
 Strengths and weaknesses of each process
documented.
 Gap Analysis.
 Core Processes included:
 Business Planning.
 Product management.
 Order management.
 Customer management.
 Vendor management.
 This allowed Mahindra Satyam to gain significant
advantage over its competitors.


Benefits:
6

 Product Management Process- Product

development time reduced by 50% (72 months to
36 months). Launch delays eliminated.
 Order Management Process- Schedule adherence
for vehicle dispatch improved to 95%. Spare parts
got ordered and delivered 50% faster.
 Customer Management Process- Sales forecasting
improved to 70% and customer complaints
reduced to 50%.
 Vendor Management Process- Material cost
reduced by 6% and vendor development time
reduced by 30%.
7

Thank You. 

Mahindra Satyam- Business Process Re-engineering Case Study.

  • 1.
    1 Enterprise-wide BPR fora leading Indian auto manufacturer. The Assam Kaziranga University- School Of Business.
  • 2.
    Business Challenge 2  MahindraSatyam was the Market Leader for Decades.  However, of late, there was tremendous competition it faced in several product categories.  REASON: Increasing Globalization, Entry of foreign companies, Import of pre-used vehicles.
  • 3.
    Mahindra Satyam’s Solution 3 BPR program in 3 broad phases:  LONG TERM BUSINESS STRATEGY Identifying new business opportunities and capitalizing on them.  Strategy to survive via Diversification and adaption to growing changes.  Mahindra Satyam was expected to leverage its current capabilities in the new markets. A market penetration strategy.
  • 4.
    4  PROCESS CENTRIC ENTERPRISE(Phase I) Preparing to migrate into PCE wherein, each process would be identified and a strategy to migrate shall be constructed.  Senior managers made responsible for all round performance of these processes.  Process goals identified and fixed.  Process framework made to be owned by respective senior managers.  Strategies constructed in a way employees could understand the need for change and its impact.
  • 5.
    PROCESS CENTRIC ENTERPRISE(Phase II) Transformation phase wherein, each key business 5 process was redesigned and adopted.  Strengths and weaknesses of each process documented.  Gap Analysis.  Core Processes included:  Business Planning.  Product management.  Order management.  Customer management.  Vendor management.  This allowed Mahindra Satyam to gain significant advantage over its competitors. 
  • 6.
    Benefits: 6  Product ManagementProcess- Product development time reduced by 50% (72 months to 36 months). Launch delays eliminated.  Order Management Process- Schedule adherence for vehicle dispatch improved to 95%. Spare parts got ordered and delivered 50% faster.  Customer Management Process- Sales forecasting improved to 70% and customer complaints reduced to 50%.  Vendor Management Process- Material cost reduced by 6% and vendor development time reduced by 30%.
  • 7.