This presentation examines the role of migration in the sustainable development goals (SDGs), the importance of internal migration, remittances and the recognised seasonal employer (RSE) scheme.
Labour Migration and Development: Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals - Alan Winters
1. Labour Migration and Development:
Implementing the SDGs
L. Alan Winters
CEO of Migrating Out of Poverty
and Professor of Economics
University of Sussex
2. The Argument
• Internal Migration is important
– Especially for poverty alleviation
• International Migration generates huge gains
– Migrants and their households
• Remittances help households
– But remittance costs is a second order issue
• The big policy gains come from increasing
numbers of migrants
14th December 2015 IOM 2
3. The SDGs on Migration
• 8.8 Protect labour rights and promote safe and
secure working environments for all workers, including
migrant workers, in particular women migrants, and
those in precarious employment
• 10.7 Facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible
migration and mobility of people, including through the
implementation of planned and well-managed
migration policies
• 10.c By 2030, reduce to less than 3 per cent the
transaction costs of migrant remittances and eliminate
remittance corridors with costs higher than 5 per cent
14th December 2015 IOM 3
4. Internal Migration is Key
• Clearly part of the SDGs
• Four-fifths of migration is internal
• Essential part of development
– Urbanisation
– Exploiting natural resources (+ and -)
– Environmental pressures
• More relevant to the poorest than international
14th December 2015 IOM 4
5. Internal Migration Helps
• Mostly viewed very positively by migrants and
their households - livelihoods, life-styles
– Ethiopia: small income differences, but 84% felt
households with migrants were better off
– Ghana: 85% of migrant h’holds report
improvement; >80% of migrants find work -
mostly informal sector
– Domestic work, construction → vulnerabilities
• Policy involves making services available,
protecting rights, avoiding discrimination
14th December 2015 IOM 5
6. International Migration: Migrants
• Development as if people mattered, not space
– i.e. count the migrants’ welfare
• Income in Jamaica = $3,600
• Income of Jamaicans = $6,500
– 235 million live where differential ≥ 20%
14th December 2015 IOM 6
Source: Clemens and Pritchett (2008)
7. Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE)
• New Zealand, 9 Pacific Islands
• Agricultural Season
• Formally evaluated and declared to be
• Best Practice
– Domestically – labour, over-staying, crime
– Development – incomes, education, poverty
14th December 2015 IOM 7
8. • Labour markets/conditions
– Pastoral care
– No recruitment fees, market wages, minimum
remuneration, transport costs shared (and loans for
worker part)
– Work-ready pools
• New Zealand Evaluation - Successful
– Reliable work-force for affected sectors
– Productivity gains if workers return
– Over-staying 1% or less
– Negligible complaints of exploitation
14th December 2015 IOM 8
9. RSE: Development Effects
• Base-line pre-programme survey
• D-i-D, with propensity mapping for samples
• Semi-annual income:
+34-38% in Tonga +30-36% in Vanuatu
• Consumption +10% in T; +ve in V
• Poverty: -50% in T at $1 pd; -30% ($2 pd); -ve in V
• Also, subjective welfare, bank account use,
durable assets, schooling
14th December 2015 IOM 9
10. Remittances to households left behind
14th December 2015 IOM 10
• Typically cut poverty, foster investment
– Precise effects depends on who migrates
• Remittances transfer income
– Migrant loses income, family gains it
• Cutting remittance costs: nice, but second order
– Global weighted average costs < 6% (2015, Q2)
– SDG aims at, say, 4% → gain of 2%
– Remittances approx. $500 billion
→ maximum gain of $10 billion p.a.
11. International Migration Policy
• Value ≈ (whost-whome) cumulated, less costs
– Defines what people will pay to migrate
• If reduce costs, e.g. recognise qualifications or
manage agent fees, where will the surplus go?
– Economic rent to migrant? Excess training?
Queuing?
• The issue is the limited stock of places creates
scarcity rents that people compete for
• The big gain is to increase numbers, therefore …
14th December 2015 IOM 11
12. Indicators
• For international migration:
– Number of migrants;
– Number of residence/working visas and
naturalisations issued by host countries
– Average ‘excess income’ of migrants
• For internal migration:
– Share of urban population that are migrants
– Explicit recognition of migrants’ rights
14th December 2015 IOM 12
Three paragraphs mention migration/migrants (23, 25, 35) and three goals (8.8, 10.7 10.c). Only one of these mentions international explicitly (35) and one (10.c) implicitly by talking of remittance corridors.
Informal sector: recycling electronic waste, food businesses and manual work (kayayei).
POINT: even if not very attractive it is better than the alternative; especially in terms of prospects
Clemens and Pritchett Popn and Dev Review, September 2008, Income per Natural
2000 USA prices
Some differences between T and V
T – strong migration already
V – only 1.5% prior emigration
T RSE attracts poorer h’holds
V RSE attracts slightly richer (still poor tho’)