This document discusses creating a computerized adaptive test (CAT) program using the Concerto platform. It describes constructing an item bank, calibrating items, specifying the CAT, and evaluating the CAT against a paper test. The evaluation found the CAT measured the same ability as the paper test using fewer items and with greater precision. User feedback suggested improving ability to predict other scores and providing better feedback. In summary, the author created a functioning CAT program and found it performed better than a paper test while identifying opportunities to enhance the user experience.

1. Creating an in-house
computerized adaptive testing
(CAT) program with Concerto
Atsushi, MIZUMOTO
(Kansai University)
2013/09/20
JLTA at Waseda University

2. Computerized Adaptive Testing

3. CAT needs
Item Response Theory

4. CTT vs. IRT
Aspect CTT IRT
Test score Ordinal scale Interval scale
Ability estimate Test-dependent Test-independent
Test result Person-dependent Person-independent
Measurement
target (Precision)
All test-takers Individuals
Equating/CAT Difficult Easy
Ohtomo (2009)

5. CAT Needs IRT
CAT
IRT
IRT
IRT

6. History of CAT Research
40 years
(Thomson & Weiss, 2011))
30 in LT
(Koyama, 2010))

7. Example of CAT

8. Example of CAT

9. CBT ≠ CAT

10. How CAT Works
http://www.j-cat.org/page/interpret

11. Advantages of CAT
•Tailored for individual test-takers
•Shorter test time
•More precision (= SE smaller)
•No need for random sampling
www.geocities.jp/kosugitti/labo/irtnote.pdf

12. Purposes
•Creating a CAT program
•Evaluation

13. Creating a CAT Program
•Choosing the CAT System
•Constructing an Item Bank (Pretest)
•Calibrating the Item Bank
•Determine Specifications & Feedback
•Administering the CAT

14. Creating a CAT Program
•Choosing the CAT System
•Constructing an Item Bank (Pretest)
•Calibrating the Item Bank
•Determine Specifications & Feedback
•Administering the CAT

15. Moodle Plugin
http://moodle2x.info

19. 1. Free account（150 test takers/month）
2. Amazon Machine Images（Free for a year）
3. Installing it on your own server

20. •Open-source
•Running R on a server (catR, RMySQL)
•HTML-based

21. Installation on a server
https://code.google.com/p/concerto-platform/wiki/installation4

22. Wiki (Resources)
https://code.google.com/p/concerto-platform/wiki/Resources?tm=6

23. Creating a CAT Program
•Choosing the CAT System
•Constructing an Item Bank (Pretest)
•Calibrating the Item Bank
•Determine Specifications & Feedback
•Administering the CAT

24. Creating a CAT Program
•Choosing the CAT System
•Constructing an Item Bank (Pretest)
•Calibrating the Item Bank
•Determine Specifications & Feedback
•Administering the CAT

25. Constructing an Item Bank
(Pretest)
•Vocabulary Test (Mizumoto, 2006)
http://www.mizumot.com/files/VocSizeMeasure.pdf
•Based on SVL 12,000
(Up to 8,000 level; 30 items for each level)
•716 university EFL learners

26. Sample Question
(1) 心の, 精神の
A.
essential
B.
creative
C.
loose
D.
mental

27. Creating a CAT Program
•Choosing the CAT System
•Constructing an Item Bank (Pretest)
•Calibrating the Item Bank
•Determine Specifications & Feedback
•Administering the CAT

28. Creating a CAT Program
•Choosing the CAT System
•Constructing an Item Bank (Pretest)
•Calibrating the Item Bank
•Determine Specifications & Feedback
•Administering the CAT

29. Calibrating the Item Bank
•240 items analyzed (Rasch model)
•150 items left for the item bank
•Calibrated with two parameter
logistic model (item difficulty & discrimination)
•Update the csv file to Concerto

30. Creating a CAT Program
•Choosing the CAT System
•Constructing an Item Bank (Pretest)
•Calibrating the Item Bank
•Determine Specifications & Feedback
•Administering the CAT

31. Creating a CAT Program
•Choosing the CAT System
•Constructing an Item Bank (Pretest)
•Calibrating the Item Bank
•Determine Specifications & Feedback
•Administering the CAT

32. Specifications of CAT
•Starting point
(parameters, initial ability, randmized/fixed）
•Ability estimation method
(empirical Bayes and others)
•Stopping rule
(Number of items/Standard error）
•Final ability estimation

33. Magis and Raîche (2012, p. 7)

34. How many items for what SE?
•Simulation with catR package
Magis, D., & Raîche, G. (2012).
http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i08

35. True Theta = 1, SE = 0.3
Stopping rule = 30 items

36. Concerto

37. http://langtest.jp/concerto/?tid=20

39. Feedback Page

40. Creating a CAT Program
•Choosing the CAT System
•Constructing an Item Bank (Pretest)
•Calibrating the Item Bank
•Determine Specifications & Feedback
•Administering the CAT

41. Creating a CAT Program
•Choosing the CAT System
•Constructing an Item Bank (Pretest)
•Calibrating the Item Bank
•Determine Specifications & Feedback
•Administering the CAT

42. 268 test takers
(university first year)
(1) CAT
(2) Paper-pencil version
(68 items) common person linking
(3) Questionnaire
“What did you think of
the CAT result?”

43. Evaluation
CAT vs. Paper-pencil

44. CAT Theta
0 1 2 3 4
-10123
0.92
-1 0 1 2 3
01234
Paper-pencil Theta
n = 268
Random
30Qs
Fixed
68Qs

45. -1 0 1 2 3
01234
Pape
n = 268
CAT
(30Qs)
M = 1.71
SD = 1.13
P-P
(68Qs)
M = 1.72
SD = 0.95

46. -1 0 1 2 3
01234
Pape
n = 268
CAT
(30Qs)
M = 1.71
SD = 1.13
P-P
(68Qs)
M = 1.72
SD = 0.95
Mean diff. = -0.02
95% CI [-0.07, 0.04]
d = 0.01
Power = .06

47. -1 0 1 2 3
01234
Pape
n = 268
CAT SE
(30Qs)
M = 0.39
SD = 0.11
P-P SE
(68Qs)
M = 1.71
SD = 1.13

48. -1 0 1 2 3
01234
Pape
n = 268
CAT SE
(30Qs)
M = 0.39
SD = 0.11
P-P SE
(68Qs)
M = 1.71
SD = 1.13
Mean diff. of SE
= -1.32
95% CI [-1.44, -1.19]
d = 1.65
Power = 0.99

49. Evaluation
CAT vs. Paper-pencil
Means: CAT = Paper-pencil
SEs: CAT < Paper-pencil
CAT measures the same ability
with much more precision
(with fewer items).

50. Evaluation
Questionnaire

51. Result of the Questionnaire
Frequency
Response
150 100 50 0 50 100 150
Very inaccurate Inaccurate Rather Inaccurate Rather accurate Accurate Very accurate

52. Feedback Page

53. Future Research
•More items in the item bank
•Better formula for predicting
other test scores
•Improved feedback
•Collaboration

54. Summary
•Created a CAT program
•Evaluation
(1) CAT better than Paper-pencil
(2) Feedback needs improvement.