Introduction to Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT)Nathan Thompson
These slides are from a short workshop I taught at the 2015 Conference for the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing (IACAT, www.iacat.org). Interested in CAT? I'd love to hear from you on LinkedIn, or visit www.assess.com to learn more.
A computer adaptive test (CAT) is an online test that adapts to each student's ability level. It selects test questions tailored to what a student knows based on their responses. This makes the test individualized, accurate, and efficient. The computer selects progressively harder questions if a student answers correctly, and easier ones if they answer incorrectly, until it can precisely measure their proficiency level. This provides a more accurate assessment than a traditional paper test by ensuring questions are neither too hard nor too easy for each student.
- Traditional tests have fixed forms with all examinees answering the same items, which is inefficient and leads to differences in precision.
- Computer adaptive testing (CAT) tailors the difficulty and number of items to each examinee based on their responses to previous questions. CAT aims to maximize precision by selecting subsequent questions based on the examinee's estimated ability level.
- CAT requires fewer items than traditional tests to arrive at equally accurate scores while providing a more personalized experience for each examinee.
Computer adaptive testing (CAT) is a form of computer-based test that adapts to the examinee's ability level by selecting subsequent test items based on the correctness of previous responses. CATs require fewer items than traditional tests to estimate a test-taker's ability level accurately. Key components of CAT include an item pool, entry level, item selection rule, scoring method, and termination criteria. Major advantages of CAT include increased precision, shorter test length, and a more positive experience for examinees. Many standardized tests now use CAT formats.
Creating an in-house computerized adaptive testing (CAT) program with ConcertoMizumoto Atsushi
This document discusses creating a computerized adaptive test (CAT) program using the Concerto platform. It describes constructing an item bank, calibrating items, specifying the CAT, and evaluating the CAT against a paper test. The evaluation found the CAT measured the same ability as the paper test using fewer items and with greater precision. User feedback suggested improving ability to predict other scores and providing better feedback. In summary, the author created a functioning CAT program and found it performed better than a paper test while identifying opportunities to enhance the user experience.
A CAT (computer adaptive test) is an individually tailored test that adapts to each student's ability level. It draws from a large bank of test items on the subject and selects increasingly difficult or easy questions based on whether the student answers correctly or incorrectly. This allows each student to be tested at an appropriate level and receive a customized exam assessing their true knowledge and abilities. The computer portion enables engaging multimedia questions and efficient scoring. A CAT provides more accurate, individualized and secure assessments that deliver fast results.
So, you've heard about adaptive testing, and wondering what it takes to develop a valid one? This presentation is made for you. It outlines a 5 step process, starting with feasibility studies and business case evaluation. More info at www.assess.com and http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=16&n=1.
The document discusses computer-based tests (CBT). It defines CBT as assessments taken on a computer that can be standalone or networked. There are two main types of CBT: linear tests that select random questions, and adaptive tests that select questions based on performance. Advantages of CBT include improved accessibility, richer data collection, streamlined administration and scoring processes, and maintained integrity. Disadvantages include an inability to write on screens and computer errors. The document also describes two CBT models: multi-stage tests and computerized adaptive tests.
Introduction to Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT)Nathan Thompson
These slides are from a short workshop I taught at the 2015 Conference for the International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing (IACAT, www.iacat.org). Interested in CAT? I'd love to hear from you on LinkedIn, or visit www.assess.com to learn more.
A computer adaptive test (CAT) is an online test that adapts to each student's ability level. It selects test questions tailored to what a student knows based on their responses. This makes the test individualized, accurate, and efficient. The computer selects progressively harder questions if a student answers correctly, and easier ones if they answer incorrectly, until it can precisely measure their proficiency level. This provides a more accurate assessment than a traditional paper test by ensuring questions are neither too hard nor too easy for each student.
- Traditional tests have fixed forms with all examinees answering the same items, which is inefficient and leads to differences in precision.
- Computer adaptive testing (CAT) tailors the difficulty and number of items to each examinee based on their responses to previous questions. CAT aims to maximize precision by selecting subsequent questions based on the examinee's estimated ability level.
- CAT requires fewer items than traditional tests to arrive at equally accurate scores while providing a more personalized experience for each examinee.
Computer adaptive testing (CAT) is a form of computer-based test that adapts to the examinee's ability level by selecting subsequent test items based on the correctness of previous responses. CATs require fewer items than traditional tests to estimate a test-taker's ability level accurately. Key components of CAT include an item pool, entry level, item selection rule, scoring method, and termination criteria. Major advantages of CAT include increased precision, shorter test length, and a more positive experience for examinees. Many standardized tests now use CAT formats.
Creating an in-house computerized adaptive testing (CAT) program with ConcertoMizumoto Atsushi
This document discusses creating a computerized adaptive test (CAT) program using the Concerto platform. It describes constructing an item bank, calibrating items, specifying the CAT, and evaluating the CAT against a paper test. The evaluation found the CAT measured the same ability as the paper test using fewer items and with greater precision. User feedback suggested improving ability to predict other scores and providing better feedback. In summary, the author created a functioning CAT program and found it performed better than a paper test while identifying opportunities to enhance the user experience.
A CAT (computer adaptive test) is an individually tailored test that adapts to each student's ability level. It draws from a large bank of test items on the subject and selects increasingly difficult or easy questions based on whether the student answers correctly or incorrectly. This allows each student to be tested at an appropriate level and receive a customized exam assessing their true knowledge and abilities. The computer portion enables engaging multimedia questions and efficient scoring. A CAT provides more accurate, individualized and secure assessments that deliver fast results.
So, you've heard about adaptive testing, and wondering what it takes to develop a valid one? This presentation is made for you. It outlines a 5 step process, starting with feasibility studies and business case evaluation. More info at www.assess.com and http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=16&n=1.
The document discusses computer-based tests (CBT). It defines CBT as assessments taken on a computer that can be standalone or networked. There are two main types of CBT: linear tests that select random questions, and adaptive tests that select questions based on performance. Advantages of CBT include improved accessibility, richer data collection, streamlined administration and scoring processes, and maintained integrity. Disadvantages include an inability to write on screens and computer errors. The document also describes two CBT models: multi-stage tests and computerized adaptive tests.
Towards a pattern recognition approach for transferring knowledge in acm v4 f...Thanh Tran
This document discusses using a User-Trained Agent (UTA) to transfer knowledge between knowledge workers in an Adaptive Case Management (ACM) system. The UTA uses pattern recognition to observe knowledge workers' activities and learn from them. It stores what it learns in a central knowledge base and can then suggest the best next actions for knowledge workers based on similar past cases. Using business ontologies and negative learning examples helps the UTA learn more quickly and provide recommendations with higher confidence levels. The UTA aims to continuously acquire, share, and improve organizational knowledge without requiring specialized training.
Caveon webinar series - smart items- using innovative item design to make you...Caveon Test Security
SmartItems are innovative item designs that generate variable item versions on-the-fly to improve test security and fairness. Dr. David Foster of Caveon answered questions about SmartItems from a webinar audience. He explained that SmartItems can be used for any item type or content area to measure a range of skills. While item difficulty may vary between versions, total test scores remain valid and comparable when combining performances. Caveon's item authoring and testing platforms integrate SmartItems, and their API allows other systems to do so as well with minimal coding.
The methods of exploratory testing has gained significant attention in industry and research in the last years. However, as many “buzzword" technologies, the introduction and application of exploratory testing is not straightforward. Exploratory testing it is not only black or white - scripted or exploratory - but also all shades of grey in between. Within the EASE industrial excellence center, we have executed an industrial workshop on exploratory testing, that helps providing understanding of how to choose feasible levels of exploration in exploratory testing. We will present the concepts of levels of exploration in exploratory testing, the outcomes of the workshop, along with relevant empirical research findings on exploratory testing.
This document summarizes a study on developing an expert system called W-CAT (Witty Cat) to analyze educational data and generate rules to provide feedback to instructors. It describes collecting student survey data on exam preparation activities and results. Association rule learning was used to generate rules from the data, such as students who viewed review videos performed poorly on exams. The study found the rules provided useful insights for instructors. Further development of W-CAT is ongoing to automate rule generation and provide human-readable explanations of results.
The document presents research on active learning strategies for robots that interact with human teachers. It found that classic active learning, which aims for query efficiency, can increase task difficulty and lead to slower, less accurate responses from teachers compared to more teacher-aware strategies. A hybrid strategy achieved intermediate results. The researchers conclude that considering the human perspective is important for active learning, as efficiency alone can undermine the interaction and learning.
A/B testing from basic concepts to advanced techniquesAnatoliy Vuets
This document outlines a presentation on A/B testing and statistical learning. It discusses A/B testing as a way to make inferences about populations based on experimental data. The key concepts covered include the null and alternative hypotheses (H0 and H1), significance levels, power, and common mistakes in A/B testing like early stopping and misinterpreting p-values. The presentation also discusses Bayesian approaches to A/B testing by setting prior distributions and updating beliefs based on experimental data and posteriors. It notes that while the frequentist framework is more mature, the Bayesian framework helps address practical issues that can occur with frequentist A/B testing.
Practical Language Testing Glenn Fulchertranslatoran
Practical LanguageTesting
Glenn Fulcher
Specifications for testing and teaching.
A sample detailed specification for a
reading test.
In this section we present an example of an architecture for a reading test. This includes
the test framework that presents the test purpose, the target test takers, the criterion
domain and the rationale for the test content. The architecture is annotated with explanations
in text boxes. This is a detailed test specification. The complexities of coding
in test specifications of this kind are usually necessary in the design and assembly of
high-stakes tests where it is essential to achieve parallel forms. There are problems with
this type of specification for use in classroom assessment, which we deal with in Section
4 below.
This document summarizes a study on developing an expert system called WittyCat to provide dynamic assessments of student exam quality. Survey data and course materials were collected and analyzed using association rule learning. Rules generated from a pilot study provided insights that helped instructors improve their teaching. The current state of WittyCat automates rule generation and seeks to explain conclusions. Contributions from additional course data and feedback are requested to evaluate WittyCat's assessments.
Measuring the impact of instant high quality feedback.Stephen Nutbrown
Measuring the impact of instant high quality feedback presented at the 5th International Assessment in Higher Education Conference. Stephen Nutbrown, Su Beesley & Colin Higgins, 2015.
Good unit tests are concise, focused on behavior rather than mechanics, and tell a story of intended usage through descriptive names and scenarios. Poor tests are overly procedural and verbose, lacking clarity. Effective testing requires considering tests as specifications that drive development by clearly expressing required functionality, rather than just verifying code works. Tests should focus on scenarios over individual operations and cut across code to demonstrate intended use.
Slides presenting preliminary overview of thesis work presented at the International Conference on Electronic Learning in the Workplace at Columbia University on June 11, 2010.
Statistical hypothesis testing in e commerceAnatoliy Vuets
Statistical hypothesis testing is used in e-commerce to help companies make the right decisions when analyzing data from A/B tests, ad-hoc analyses, and building models. A statistical test compares a null hypothesis (H0) to an alternative hypothesis (H1) using a sample of data. It estimates the probability of observing the sample if the null hypothesis is true. If this probability is low, the null hypothesis can be rejected in favor of the alternative. The key parameters of a statistical test are the significance level, which is the probability of falsely rejecting the null hypothesis, and power, which is the probability of correctly rejecting the null when the alternative is true. In e-commerce, increasing sample size or effect size can improve
Best Practices for the Academic User: Maximizing the Impact of Your Instituti...Qualtrics
To view the on-demand webinar for this presentation see the following link: https://success.qualtrics.com/academic-best-practices-watch.html
Qualtrics has changed the landscape for colleges and universities, introducing many features to help academic decision makers run more successful surveys.
Join Qualtrics and Jag Patel, Associate Director of Institutional Research at MIT, as we share best practices and tips for academic users.
Chaplin school of hospitality and tourism management interRAJU852744
The document describes an internship project to improve the speed, accuracy, reliability, cost effectiveness, and flow of processes at Jumbo Buffet, a 20-year-old Chinese-American buffet restaurant. The intern will analyze aspects of Jumbo Buffet over 10 weeks, including food/service quality, customer satisfaction, aging facilities, and make recommendations. Specifically, the intern aims to address noise from the aging air conditioning system, which negatively impacts customers and costs the restaurant potential business. Data will be collected on noise levels, customer complaints, occupancy, and other factors to inform solutions.
AUTOMATIC GENERATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF TEST DATA USING HARMONY SEARCH ALGOR...csandit
Software testing is the primary phase, which is performed during software development and it is
carried by a sequence of instructions of test inputs followed by expected output. The Harmony
Search (HS) algorithm is based on the improvisation process of music. In comparison to other
algorithms, the HSA has gain popularity and superiority in the field of evolutionary
computation. When musicians compose the harmony through different possible combinations of
the music, at that time the pitches are stored in the harmony memory and the optimization can
be done by adjusting the input pitches and generate the perfect harmony. The test case
generation process is used to identify test cases with resources and also identifies critical
domain requirements. In this paper, the role of Harmony search meta-heuristic search
technique is analyzed in generating random test data and optimized those test data. Test data
are generated and optimized by applying in a case study i.e. a withdrawal task in Bank ATM
through Harmony search. It is observed that this algorithm generates suitable test cases as well
as test data and gives brief details about the Harmony search method. It is used for test data
generation and optimization
- Contact Prometric or Pearson VUE to schedule an exam and find a testing location near you
- Provide two forms of ID on exam day, such as a driver's license and credit card
- Arrive at least 20 minutes early for check-in and allow the recommended time to complete the exam
- Bring only your ID; no notes or other materials are permitted in the testing center
The document describes a software called THE TESTPERFECTOR that allows users to create, scramble, and grade multiple choice exams easily. Some key features mentioned include scrambling questions and answers so no two students receive the same exam, statistical analysis of exam results, compatibility with Microsoft Word, and scanning of answer sheets without needing specialized equipment. The software aims to reduce cheating on exams while providing detailed feedback to help students improve.
This document discusses research methods for evaluating the effectiveness of training programs. It recommends:
1) Forming a hypothesis about a training method and conducting pre-tests and post-tests to evaluate it. This can be done with one group over time or by comparing a test group that receives the training to a control group.
2) Gathering feedback through evaluations to assess how the training impacted learning, behavior change, and business metrics. Four levels of evaluation are identified.
3) Analyzing the results using statistical tests like a t-test to determine if the training caused the observed changes rather than random variation. The results should then be communicated and used to improve future training programs.
1) Evidence-centered design (ECD) is a methodology for test design that emphasizes the role of evidentiary reasoning in assessment. It involves six models: student, evidence, task, presentation, assembly, and delivery.
2) The task model describes how evidence is collected through test tasks. Effective tasks elicit evidence relevant to the constructs being tested.
3) Describing tasks involves identifying the constructs being tested and the relationship between constructs and behaviors. It also describes task features that provide evidence for inferences about constructs.
Many students failed an introductory Java programming course. A study developed dashboards displaying students' online activity and predicted performance to provide weekly feedback. Students receiving dashboards completed more online tasks but did not have significantly higher pass rates or exam scores compared to the control group. The aim was to increase course success through personalized feedback on e-learning progress.
An Adaptive Evaluation System to Test Student Caliber using Item Response TheoryEditor IJMTER
Computational creativity research has produced many computational systems that are
described as creative [1]. A comprehensive literature survey reveals that although such systems are
labelled as creative, there is a distinct lack of evaluation of the Creativity of creative systems [1].
Nowadays, a number of online testing websites exist but the drawback of these tests is that every
student who gives a particular test will always be given the same set of questions irrespective of their
caliber. Thus, a student with a very high Intelligence Quotient (IQ) may be forced to answer basic
level questions and in the same way weaker students may be asked very challenging questions which
they cannot response. This method of testing results into a wastage of time for the high IQ students
and can be quite frustrating for the weaker students. This would never benefit a teacher to understand
a particular student’s caliber for the subject under Consideration. Each learner has different learning
status and therefore different test items should be used in their evaluation. This paper proposes an
Adaptive Evaluation System developed based on an Item Response Theory and would be created for
mobile end user keeping in mind the flexibility of students to attempt the test from anywhere. This
application would not only dynamically customize questions for students based on the previous
question he/she has answered but also by adjusting the degree of difficulty for test questions
depending on student ability, a teacher can acquire a valid & reliable measurement of student’s
competency.
Towards a pattern recognition approach for transferring knowledge in acm v4 f...Thanh Tran
This document discusses using a User-Trained Agent (UTA) to transfer knowledge between knowledge workers in an Adaptive Case Management (ACM) system. The UTA uses pattern recognition to observe knowledge workers' activities and learn from them. It stores what it learns in a central knowledge base and can then suggest the best next actions for knowledge workers based on similar past cases. Using business ontologies and negative learning examples helps the UTA learn more quickly and provide recommendations with higher confidence levels. The UTA aims to continuously acquire, share, and improve organizational knowledge without requiring specialized training.
Caveon webinar series - smart items- using innovative item design to make you...Caveon Test Security
SmartItems are innovative item designs that generate variable item versions on-the-fly to improve test security and fairness. Dr. David Foster of Caveon answered questions about SmartItems from a webinar audience. He explained that SmartItems can be used for any item type or content area to measure a range of skills. While item difficulty may vary between versions, total test scores remain valid and comparable when combining performances. Caveon's item authoring and testing platforms integrate SmartItems, and their API allows other systems to do so as well with minimal coding.
The methods of exploratory testing has gained significant attention in industry and research in the last years. However, as many “buzzword" technologies, the introduction and application of exploratory testing is not straightforward. Exploratory testing it is not only black or white - scripted or exploratory - but also all shades of grey in between. Within the EASE industrial excellence center, we have executed an industrial workshop on exploratory testing, that helps providing understanding of how to choose feasible levels of exploration in exploratory testing. We will present the concepts of levels of exploration in exploratory testing, the outcomes of the workshop, along with relevant empirical research findings on exploratory testing.
This document summarizes a study on developing an expert system called W-CAT (Witty Cat) to analyze educational data and generate rules to provide feedback to instructors. It describes collecting student survey data on exam preparation activities and results. Association rule learning was used to generate rules from the data, such as students who viewed review videos performed poorly on exams. The study found the rules provided useful insights for instructors. Further development of W-CAT is ongoing to automate rule generation and provide human-readable explanations of results.
The document presents research on active learning strategies for robots that interact with human teachers. It found that classic active learning, which aims for query efficiency, can increase task difficulty and lead to slower, less accurate responses from teachers compared to more teacher-aware strategies. A hybrid strategy achieved intermediate results. The researchers conclude that considering the human perspective is important for active learning, as efficiency alone can undermine the interaction and learning.
A/B testing from basic concepts to advanced techniquesAnatoliy Vuets
This document outlines a presentation on A/B testing and statistical learning. It discusses A/B testing as a way to make inferences about populations based on experimental data. The key concepts covered include the null and alternative hypotheses (H0 and H1), significance levels, power, and common mistakes in A/B testing like early stopping and misinterpreting p-values. The presentation also discusses Bayesian approaches to A/B testing by setting prior distributions and updating beliefs based on experimental data and posteriors. It notes that while the frequentist framework is more mature, the Bayesian framework helps address practical issues that can occur with frequentist A/B testing.
Practical Language Testing Glenn Fulchertranslatoran
Practical LanguageTesting
Glenn Fulcher
Specifications for testing and teaching.
A sample detailed specification for a
reading test.
In this section we present an example of an architecture for a reading test. This includes
the test framework that presents the test purpose, the target test takers, the criterion
domain and the rationale for the test content. The architecture is annotated with explanations
in text boxes. This is a detailed test specification. The complexities of coding
in test specifications of this kind are usually necessary in the design and assembly of
high-stakes tests where it is essential to achieve parallel forms. There are problems with
this type of specification for use in classroom assessment, which we deal with in Section
4 below.
This document summarizes a study on developing an expert system called WittyCat to provide dynamic assessments of student exam quality. Survey data and course materials were collected and analyzed using association rule learning. Rules generated from a pilot study provided insights that helped instructors improve their teaching. The current state of WittyCat automates rule generation and seeks to explain conclusions. Contributions from additional course data and feedback are requested to evaluate WittyCat's assessments.
Measuring the impact of instant high quality feedback.Stephen Nutbrown
Measuring the impact of instant high quality feedback presented at the 5th International Assessment in Higher Education Conference. Stephen Nutbrown, Su Beesley & Colin Higgins, 2015.
Good unit tests are concise, focused on behavior rather than mechanics, and tell a story of intended usage through descriptive names and scenarios. Poor tests are overly procedural and verbose, lacking clarity. Effective testing requires considering tests as specifications that drive development by clearly expressing required functionality, rather than just verifying code works. Tests should focus on scenarios over individual operations and cut across code to demonstrate intended use.
Slides presenting preliminary overview of thesis work presented at the International Conference on Electronic Learning in the Workplace at Columbia University on June 11, 2010.
Statistical hypothesis testing in e commerceAnatoliy Vuets
Statistical hypothesis testing is used in e-commerce to help companies make the right decisions when analyzing data from A/B tests, ad-hoc analyses, and building models. A statistical test compares a null hypothesis (H0) to an alternative hypothesis (H1) using a sample of data. It estimates the probability of observing the sample if the null hypothesis is true. If this probability is low, the null hypothesis can be rejected in favor of the alternative. The key parameters of a statistical test are the significance level, which is the probability of falsely rejecting the null hypothesis, and power, which is the probability of correctly rejecting the null when the alternative is true. In e-commerce, increasing sample size or effect size can improve
Best Practices for the Academic User: Maximizing the Impact of Your Instituti...Qualtrics
To view the on-demand webinar for this presentation see the following link: https://success.qualtrics.com/academic-best-practices-watch.html
Qualtrics has changed the landscape for colleges and universities, introducing many features to help academic decision makers run more successful surveys.
Join Qualtrics and Jag Patel, Associate Director of Institutional Research at MIT, as we share best practices and tips for academic users.
Chaplin school of hospitality and tourism management interRAJU852744
The document describes an internship project to improve the speed, accuracy, reliability, cost effectiveness, and flow of processes at Jumbo Buffet, a 20-year-old Chinese-American buffet restaurant. The intern will analyze aspects of Jumbo Buffet over 10 weeks, including food/service quality, customer satisfaction, aging facilities, and make recommendations. Specifically, the intern aims to address noise from the aging air conditioning system, which negatively impacts customers and costs the restaurant potential business. Data will be collected on noise levels, customer complaints, occupancy, and other factors to inform solutions.
AUTOMATIC GENERATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF TEST DATA USING HARMONY SEARCH ALGOR...csandit
Software testing is the primary phase, which is performed during software development and it is
carried by a sequence of instructions of test inputs followed by expected output. The Harmony
Search (HS) algorithm is based on the improvisation process of music. In comparison to other
algorithms, the HSA has gain popularity and superiority in the field of evolutionary
computation. When musicians compose the harmony through different possible combinations of
the music, at that time the pitches are stored in the harmony memory and the optimization can
be done by adjusting the input pitches and generate the perfect harmony. The test case
generation process is used to identify test cases with resources and also identifies critical
domain requirements. In this paper, the role of Harmony search meta-heuristic search
technique is analyzed in generating random test data and optimized those test data. Test data
are generated and optimized by applying in a case study i.e. a withdrawal task in Bank ATM
through Harmony search. It is observed that this algorithm generates suitable test cases as well
as test data and gives brief details about the Harmony search method. It is used for test data
generation and optimization
- Contact Prometric or Pearson VUE to schedule an exam and find a testing location near you
- Provide two forms of ID on exam day, such as a driver's license and credit card
- Arrive at least 20 minutes early for check-in and allow the recommended time to complete the exam
- Bring only your ID; no notes or other materials are permitted in the testing center
The document describes a software called THE TESTPERFECTOR that allows users to create, scramble, and grade multiple choice exams easily. Some key features mentioned include scrambling questions and answers so no two students receive the same exam, statistical analysis of exam results, compatibility with Microsoft Word, and scanning of answer sheets without needing specialized equipment. The software aims to reduce cheating on exams while providing detailed feedback to help students improve.
This document discusses research methods for evaluating the effectiveness of training programs. It recommends:
1) Forming a hypothesis about a training method and conducting pre-tests and post-tests to evaluate it. This can be done with one group over time or by comparing a test group that receives the training to a control group.
2) Gathering feedback through evaluations to assess how the training impacted learning, behavior change, and business metrics. Four levels of evaluation are identified.
3) Analyzing the results using statistical tests like a t-test to determine if the training caused the observed changes rather than random variation. The results should then be communicated and used to improve future training programs.
1) Evidence-centered design (ECD) is a methodology for test design that emphasizes the role of evidentiary reasoning in assessment. It involves six models: student, evidence, task, presentation, assembly, and delivery.
2) The task model describes how evidence is collected through test tasks. Effective tasks elicit evidence relevant to the constructs being tested.
3) Describing tasks involves identifying the constructs being tested and the relationship between constructs and behaviors. It also describes task features that provide evidence for inferences about constructs.
Many students failed an introductory Java programming course. A study developed dashboards displaying students' online activity and predicted performance to provide weekly feedback. Students receiving dashboards completed more online tasks but did not have significantly higher pass rates or exam scores compared to the control group. The aim was to increase course success through personalized feedback on e-learning progress.
An Adaptive Evaluation System to Test Student Caliber using Item Response TheoryEditor IJMTER
Computational creativity research has produced many computational systems that are
described as creative [1]. A comprehensive literature survey reveals that although such systems are
labelled as creative, there is a distinct lack of evaluation of the Creativity of creative systems [1].
Nowadays, a number of online testing websites exist but the drawback of these tests is that every
student who gives a particular test will always be given the same set of questions irrespective of their
caliber. Thus, a student with a very high Intelligence Quotient (IQ) may be forced to answer basic
level questions and in the same way weaker students may be asked very challenging questions which
they cannot response. This method of testing results into a wastage of time for the high IQ students
and can be quite frustrating for the weaker students. This would never benefit a teacher to understand
a particular student’s caliber for the subject under Consideration. Each learner has different learning
status and therefore different test items should be used in their evaluation. This paper proposes an
Adaptive Evaluation System developed based on an Item Response Theory and would be created for
mobile end user keeping in mind the flexibility of students to attempt the test from anywhere. This
application would not only dynamically customize questions for students based on the previous
question he/she has answered but also by adjusting the degree of difficulty for test questions
depending on student ability, a teacher can acquire a valid & reliable measurement of student’s
competency.
Quantitative techniques refer to scientific, mathematical, and statistical methods for solving complex business problems. These techniques include statistical methods like data collection, analysis, and forecasting as well as operations research techniques like linear programming. Quantitative techniques help organizations make data-driven decisions in areas like marketing, production, finance, personnel management, research and development, and economics. The document then provides details on specific quantitative techniques and the steps involved in marketing research.
Investigating learning strategies in a dispositional learning analytics conte...Bart Rienties
This document discusses a study analyzing how students use worked examples, tutored problem-solving, and untutored problem-solving in an online math tutorial system called SOWISO. The study examines how these learning modes relate to student performance and dispositions. Key findings include: (1) engagement with tutorials and mastery of content strongly predicts exam scores; (2) students frequently use worked examples and rarely use hints for tutored problem-solving; (3) adaptive dispositions correlate with timely preparation and less example use, while maladaptive dispositions correlate with less preparation and more example use.
This document provides information for the course "Introduction to Data Science" (ITEC-313) at Jazan University. The course is a required 3 credit hour course consisting of 2 hours of theory and 2 hours of lab per week. The course objectives are to describe data science and the needed skill sets, understand the data science process and how its components interact, carry out basic statistical modeling and analysis, and apply the data science process in a case study. Topics covered include data collection/integration, exploratory data analysis, predictive/descriptive modeling, and effective communication. The course aims to equip students with basic data science principles, concepts, techniques and tools. It will be assessed through assignments, exams, quizzes
This document discusses machine intelligence and machine learning. It covers topics such as behavior-based AI vs knowledge-based AI, supervised vs unsupervised learning, classification vs prediction, and decision tree induction for classification. Decision trees are built using an algorithm that selects the attribute that best splits the data at each step to create partitions. Pruning techniques are used to avoid overfitting.
Technology-based assessments-special education
New technologies remain competitive in driving efforts to make learning more efficient. Technology-based assessment in special education has made quite some advancement (Goldsmith & LeBlanc, 2004). First applications of computer technology assessment were for the scoring student's test forms. Currently, features incorporate self-administration, software control in presentation, response evaluation based on algorithms, prescription based on expert knowledge and direct links in assessment and change in instructions. The technology-based assessment uses electronic and software systems to evaluate individual children in an educational setting. Traditional assessments employ approaches of the computer.
Video-based computer assisted test enabled learning of language for the student automatically increasing the validity of measurements. Video segments incorporated movie elements of moral dilemma in problem-solving tests. Students viewing the video segments respond by simply touching the screen. Innovative approaches have created relevance in testing procedures. Misplaced students result into poor results and get prompted to drop out. Teachers not well trained contribute to the misplacement due to poor management of certain behaviors and learning differences. For effect, teachers must be able to analyze data produced by the assessment and develop a due course of action.
In addressing students with physical limitations use of voice recognition, handwriting interpreters, stylus tools, and touchscreen enables communication without the use of keys (Gierach, 2009). New software features allow students to perform comfortable pace of video segments on preferred language options. Computers are linked to videodisc enabling students to learn according to individual needs and skills. Latest technological features concern evaluation. Technological advancements assess social competence among students. The evaluator views students in a variety of context. Limitation in technology infrastructure, seen as the key barrier in this sort of assessment. Many district schools lack adequate high-speed broadband access necessary for this evaluation. Moreover, obsolesce in technology-based assessment erodes the capacity to provide quality services technology-based systems have a relatively short functional life.
Holistic assessments are the best in technology-based assessments. They incorporate software control in presentation, conceptual models or algorithms, decision-making based rules and expert knowledge (Redecker, & Johannessen, 2013). Proliferation technology helps students in the inclusion of speech recognition, electronic communication, personal computers, robotics and artificial intelligence. Trends in technology-based assessments have impacted lives of students with a disability. They achieve school improvement goals as well as tracking student growth and progress. Current assessment norms have embedded current stan ...
This document discusses explanations in data systems. It provides examples of explaining outliers in datasets and answers to database queries. It also covers representing explanations as attribute-value pairs or predicates, efficiently finding explanations using techniques like frequent itemsets or decision trees, and ranking explanations based on their influence. The document proposes research ideas around assisting data exploration by providing explanations for aggregate query results over ranges.
The Anatomy of a 21st Century Educator Simon Bates
The document discusses the potential of technology to transform education in the 21st century. It focuses on how student-generated content through tools like PeerWise, a web-based platform where students create and review multiple choice questions, can enhance learning through peer engagement and assessment. Analysis of PeerWise data found that students participated beyond minimum requirements, their question quality improved over time, and higher participation correlated with better learning as measured by standardized tests. The tool provides a model for leveraging student creativity to support learning at scale.
Learning analytics are more than measurementDragan Gasevic
Slides used for the keynote
Learning analytics are more than measurement
at
Policies for Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics Briefing
organized by http://www.laceproject.eu/
This document provides an overview of a virtual in-service training on item analysis using CITAS (Classical Item and Test Analysis Spreadsheet) conducted by Mr. Fritz M. Ferran. The training covered understanding classical test theory, fundamentals of item analysis including item difficulty, discrimination, validity and reliability. It also demonstrated how to perform item analysis using the CITAS software by transferring test data and keys to interpret the results.
This document provides information about a biometry course offered to third year biotechnology students. The 3 credit course aims to improve students' statistical and inferential skills needed to design experiments, analyze and interpret data, and draw valid conclusions. It will cover topics like experimental design, analysis of variance, single and multifactor experiments, assumptions of ANOVA, regression and correlation analysis, and use of statistical software. Assessment will include tests, assignments, a practical exam, and a final exam. Students are expected to actively participate in lectures, group work and software demonstrations.
The power of learning analytics for UCL: lessons learned from the Open Univer...Bart Rienties
Across the globe many institutions and organisations have high hopes that learning analytics can play a major role in helping their organisations remain fit-for-purpose, flexible, and innovative. Learning analytics applications in education are expected to provide institutions with opportunities to support learner progression, but more importantly in the near future provide personalised, rich learning on a large scale. In this seminar, we will discuss lessons learned from various learning analytics applications at the OU.
This document provides an overview of the incremental build model that Project Pluto will adopt to develop their software system. The incremental build model involves iterative development where requirements are broken into prioritized builds. Each build adds new capabilities and allows for frequent testing, demonstration of progress, and verification of work completed so far. This approach provides benefits like continuous integration and validation of the evolving product, frequent delivery of working functionality, and ability to make changes based on feedback.
IRJET - Automatic Attendance Provision using Image ProcessingIRJET Journal
The document proposes an automatic attendance system using image processing and face recognition techniques to identify students faces from video frames in order to automatically record attendance. It discusses issues with current manual attendance systems and outlines a proposed solution using motion sensors and face recognition algorithms to identify a minimum of 3 faces at a time and allow for easy deployment of the system. The system would help save time over manual methods and reduce errors by automatically recognizing student faces and recording attendance data.
This document discusses pre-calibration models and frameworks for automatically generating assessment items. It proposes a conceptual frame that defines cognitive task models, item forms, form-level characteristics, item models, primary content, item families, and secondary content. It then proposes a pre-calibration model that represents the generative process at different levels. As an illustration, it analyzes data from a summer math program that administered automatically generated math items to students. The analysis found good correlation with a calibration model and provided estimates of properties at different generative levels. The discussion notes that variation among generated instances is different than residual unmodeled variation, and evaluating generative properties supports item banking and refinement.
BANK INFORMATION SYSTEM DESIGN PROBLEM IN CENTRAL ELECTRONIC EDUCATION AND H...Novita Ajeng Primantari
This document discusses the design of an electronic bank information system for the Central Electronic Education and Human Resources Development Training center at the Ministry of Finance in Indonesia. The current system for managing test items (questions) at the center is manual and lacks standardization. The proposed new system would automate processes like question writing, review, analysis, and selection using a standardized format. It would also conduct both qualitative (theoretical) and quantitative (empirical) analysis of questions, including measuring difficulty level and ability to distinguish candidates. The system would be developed using Rapid Application Development and the Unified Modeling Language, and use ASP.NET, C#, and SQL Server. The goal is to help effectively manage the question bank and produce valid assessment
Data Clustering in Education for StudentsIRJET Journal
This document discusses using k-means clustering to analyze student behavior and performance based on factors like exam scores, assignments, tests, and attendance. The goal is to evaluate students accurately and help professors reduce failure rates and improve performance. It provides background on data clustering and how it can be applied in education. A proposed model is described that uses students' previous grades, quiz scores, assignment completion, lab performance, class test scores and attendance to predict their final grades. The k-means clustering algorithm is explained and results are presented showing how students were clustered into groups based on GPA and whether they passed or failed. The clustering aims to identify weaker students before exams to help improve their performance.
Similar to What makes a good adaptive testing program (20)
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...indexPub
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptHenry Hollis
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
2. www.twosigmas.com twitter.com/twosigmas_ facebook/twosigmaspage
Advantage of IRT based CAT
2
On a 40 question exam with dichotomous
scoring (wrong or right), the total number of
questions you might need to develop is
240
= 1.01 × 1012
.
On a well designed IRT based CAT, the total
number of questions you might need to
develop is
≈ 400.
3. www.twosigmas.com twitter.com/twosigmas_ facebook/twosigmaspage
Who is your market?
3
Students – Computer adaptive teaching/
learning? Blended learning with MOOCs?
Schools – Adaptive homework? Computer
based in school exams? Formative
assessment?
Exam Board – Professionalize organizations?
Corporations? Government organizations?
9. www.twosigmas.com twitter.com/twosigmas_ facebook/twosigmaspage
References:
9
• Baker, F. B. and Kim, S. (2004). Item Response Theory Parameter Estimation
Techniques, 2nd Edition, Revised and Expanded. New York, NY: CRC Press,
Taylor and Francis Group.
• Bao, Han, Dayton, C. Mitchell, & Hendrickson, Amy B. (2009). Differential Item
Functioning Amplification and Cancellation in a Reading Test. Practical
Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(19). Available online:
http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=14&n=19
• Bergstorm, B. A., Gershon, R.C., and Brown, W. L. (1993) Differential Item
Functioning vs. Differential Test Functioning. Paper Presented at the Annual
Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Atlanta, GA. April 12 -
16) Retrieved on February 20, 2011 from
http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED377227.pdf
• Birdsall, M (2011) Implementing Computer Adaptive Testing to Improve
Achievement Opportunities. Ofqual, Coventry. Online at:
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.ofqual.gov.uk/files/2011-06-
15-implementing-computer-adaptive-testing-to-improve-achievement-
opportunities.pdf
• Bowles, R. and Pommerich, M. (2001). An Examination of Item Review on a CAT
Using the Specific Information Item Selection Algorithm. Paper presented at the
Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Seattle, WA.
• Childs, Ruth A. & Andrew P. Jaciw (2003). Matrix sampling of items in large-scale
assessments. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(16). Retrieved
February 22, 2011 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=16
• de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. New
York, NY: The Guildfor Press.
• He, Q. (2010) Maintaining Standards in on Demand Testing Using Item Response
Theory. Ofqual, Coventry. Retrieved on February 10, 2011, from http://e-
assessment.org.uk/images/uploads/s-docs/Ofqual-10-4724-Maintaining-
standards.pdf
• Newton, Paul E. (2007) 'Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment',
Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14:2, 149 -170. Retrieved
February 20, 2011 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09695940701478321
• Pommerich, M., Segall, D.O., & Moreno, K.E. (2009). The nine lives of CAT-ASVAB:
Innovations and revelations. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC
Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. Retrieved on February 15, 2011
from www.psych.umn.edu/psylabs/CATCentral/
• Rudner, L. M. (2007). Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test®
computerized adaptive test. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC
Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. Retrieved January 10, 2010 from
www.psych.umn.edu/psylabs/CATCentral/
• Segall, D. O. and Moreno, K. E. (1999) Development of the CAT-ASVAB. In F.
Drasgow & J. B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.). Innovations in Computerized Assessment
(pp. 35—65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved on February
20, 2011 from http://www.danielsegall.com/catasvab.pdf
• van der Linden, W. J. and Glas, A. W. (eds.), (2010) Elements of Computer
Adaptive Testing: Statistics. Chapters 4, 10, 17, and page 349. London, UK:
Springer Science + Business Media LLC.
• Wise, L. L., Curran, L. T., & McBride, J. R. (1997). CAT-ASVAB Cost and Benefit
Analyses. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, & J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized
adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 227-236). Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
• Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Three Generations of DIF Analyses: Considering Where it Has
Been, Where it is Now, and Where it is Going. Language Assessment Quarterly,
4(2), 223-233, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Retrieved February 20,
2011 from http://educ.ubc.ca/faculty/zumbo/papers/Zumbo_LAQ_reprint.pdf