Abstract: Research on Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic robotics Finger mechanisms is being carried out
to accommodate a variety of tasks such as grasping and manipulation of objects in the field of industrial
applications, service robots, and rehabilitation robots. The first step in realizing a fully functional of
anthropomorphic robotics Finger mechanisms is kinematic modeling. In this paper, a Kinematic Model of
Anthropomorphic robotics Finger mechanism is proposed based on the biological equivalent of human hand
where each links interconnect at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and distal
interphalangeal (DIP) joints respectively. The Kinematic modeling was carried out using Denavit Hartenburg
(DH) algorithm for the proposed of Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic robotics Finger mechanisms.
Index Terms— Anthropomorphic robot Finger, Modeling, Robotics, Simulation
This document discusses forward and inverse kinematics examples of different types of robot manipulators including 2R, 3R, and 3P manipulators. It provides examples of solving forward and inverse kinematics for specific manipulator types, including:
1) PUMA robot with both concurrent and non-concurrent wrists. The inverse kinematics is solved to find the joint positions given the end effector position and orientation.
2) SCARA manipulator with RRP pairs as arms. The forward and inverse position calculations are demonstrated.
3) Cylindrical and spherical robots with 3 DOF non-concurrent wrists. The procedures for obtaining the inverse kinematics solutions are described.
4
This document discusses redundancy in robotics. It defines a kinematically redundant robot as having more degrees of freedom than needed to place an end effector in a desired location. For example, a robot with more than six degrees of freedom can be redundant for tasks in three-dimensional space which only require six degrees. Redundancy allows for multiple feasible inverse kinematics solutions and can be used to achieve additional objectives like avoiding obstacles or singularities. However, redundant robots are also more complex, expensive, and difficult to control.
The document discusses forward kinematics, which is finding the position and orientation of the end effector given the joint angles of a robot. It covers different types of robot joints and configurations. It introduces the Denavit-Hartenberg coordinate system for defining the relationship between successive links of a robot. The document also discusses forward kinematic calculations, inverse kinematics, robot workspaces, and trajectory planning.
The document discusses the kinematic modeling of robot manipulators. It introduces the forward and inverse kinematic problems and describes how the Denavit-Hartenberg convention is used to assign reference frames to each link of a robotic arm. This convention specifies assigning frames using four parameters - link offset (d), joint angle (θ), link length (a), and link twist (α). Together these parameters define the homogeneous transformation between adjacent links via rotation and translation operations, allowing the complete forward kinematic model to be described with minimal parameters.
This document provides an overview of basic joints, kinematics concepts, and coordinate frame transformations using matrices. It defines spherical, revolute, and prismatic joints. It also defines forward and inverse kinematics. The document then reviews dot products, matrix operations, and basic transformations including translation, rotation, and combining them into homogeneous transformations using 4x4 matrices.
The document discusses different methods for representing 3D rotations and orientations, including rotation matrices, Euler angles, and quaternions. It explains that quaternions represent a rotation as a combination of a scalar and vector, and describe how to perform operations like rotation, composition, and normalization using quaternions. Quaternions use fewer parameters than rotation matrices but more easily represent arbitrary rotations and can be interpolated for smooth animation.
1. The document describes a 2 link planar manipulator with 2 rotational joints and specifies the link lengths and coordinate frames.
2. It covers the forward kinematics to find the endpoint using homogeneous transformations by composing individual coordinate transforms between frames.
3. As an example, it shows the coordinate transforms between Frame 0 to Frame 1 which is a rotation of 30 degrees and translation of (1,1) and between Frame 1 to Frame 2 which is a rotation of 60 degrees and translation of (1/2,√3/2).
This document discusses forward and inverse kinematics examples of different types of robot manipulators including 2R, 3R, and 3P manipulators. It provides examples of solving forward and inverse kinematics for specific manipulator types, including:
1) PUMA robot with both concurrent and non-concurrent wrists. The inverse kinematics is solved to find the joint positions given the end effector position and orientation.
2) SCARA manipulator with RRP pairs as arms. The forward and inverse position calculations are demonstrated.
3) Cylindrical and spherical robots with 3 DOF non-concurrent wrists. The procedures for obtaining the inverse kinematics solutions are described.
4
This document discusses redundancy in robotics. It defines a kinematically redundant robot as having more degrees of freedom than needed to place an end effector in a desired location. For example, a robot with more than six degrees of freedom can be redundant for tasks in three-dimensional space which only require six degrees. Redundancy allows for multiple feasible inverse kinematics solutions and can be used to achieve additional objectives like avoiding obstacles or singularities. However, redundant robots are also more complex, expensive, and difficult to control.
The document discusses forward kinematics, which is finding the position and orientation of the end effector given the joint angles of a robot. It covers different types of robot joints and configurations. It introduces the Denavit-Hartenberg coordinate system for defining the relationship between successive links of a robot. The document also discusses forward kinematic calculations, inverse kinematics, robot workspaces, and trajectory planning.
The document discusses the kinematic modeling of robot manipulators. It introduces the forward and inverse kinematic problems and describes how the Denavit-Hartenberg convention is used to assign reference frames to each link of a robotic arm. This convention specifies assigning frames using four parameters - link offset (d), joint angle (θ), link length (a), and link twist (α). Together these parameters define the homogeneous transformation between adjacent links via rotation and translation operations, allowing the complete forward kinematic model to be described with minimal parameters.
This document provides an overview of basic joints, kinematics concepts, and coordinate frame transformations using matrices. It defines spherical, revolute, and prismatic joints. It also defines forward and inverse kinematics. The document then reviews dot products, matrix operations, and basic transformations including translation, rotation, and combining them into homogeneous transformations using 4x4 matrices.
The document discusses different methods for representing 3D rotations and orientations, including rotation matrices, Euler angles, and quaternions. It explains that quaternions represent a rotation as a combination of a scalar and vector, and describe how to perform operations like rotation, composition, and normalization using quaternions. Quaternions use fewer parameters than rotation matrices but more easily represent arbitrary rotations and can be interpolated for smooth animation.
1. The document describes a 2 link planar manipulator with 2 rotational joints and specifies the link lengths and coordinate frames.
2. It covers the forward kinematics to find the endpoint using homogeneous transformations by composing individual coordinate transforms between frames.
3. As an example, it shows the coordinate transforms between Frame 0 to Frame 1 which is a rotation of 30 degrees and translation of (1,1) and between Frame 1 to Frame 2 which is a rotation of 60 degrees and translation of (1/2,√3/2).
1. The document discusses differential kinematics and how it can be used to examine the pose velocities of robot frames. It also covers Jacobians and how they map between joint and Cartesian space velocities.
2. Specific topics covered include differential transformations, screw velocity matrices, relating velocities in different frames, determining Jacobians for serial and parallel robots, and examining robot singularities.
3. Singularities occur when the mechanism loses mobility in certain directions and joint rates will increase near these configurations. Workarounds include tooling design, changing to joint space control near singularities, and carefully planning paths.
Robot forward and inverse kinematics research using matlab by d.sivasamySiva Samy
The document discusses developing forward and inverse kinematic models of a Scorbot era 5u plus industrial robot using MATLAB. It begins by introducing the Denavit-Hartenberg parameters for representing robot kinematics. Then it describes modeling the specific Scorbot era 5u plus robot in MATLAB, including defining its link lengths and joint ranges using DH parameters. Forward kinematics analysis is performed by varying the joint angles to find the end effector position and orientation. Validation is done by comparing the results to a commercial robot simulator and LabVIEW. Inverse kinematics analysis is also developed to determine required joint angles to achieve a desired end effector pose.
This document discusses forward and inverse kinematics, including:
1. Forward kinematics determines the position of the robot hand given joint variables, while inverse kinematics calculates joint variables for a desired hand position.
2. Homogeneous transformation matrices are used to represent frames, points, vectors and transformations in space.
3. Standard robot coordinate systems include Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical coordinates. Forward and inverse kinematics equations are provided for position analysis in each system.
This document discusses robot kinematics and various representations used to describe the position and orientation of objects in 3D space. It introduces the homogeneous transformation matrix which uses rotation and translation operators to relate coordinate frames. Different coordinate systems like Cartesian, cylindrical and spherical are covered. It also discusses Euler angles, Denavit-Hartenberg parameters and their rules for assigning coordinates to define the kinematic structure of a robot.
This document provides an introduction to robot kinematics. It discusses the basic joints used in robotics including revolute, spherical, and prismatic joints. It covers forward and inverse kinematics problems. Key concepts explained include homogeneous transformations using 4x4 matrices to represent rotations and translations between coordinate frames, and rotation matrices for transforming between 3D coordinate systems. Examples are provided for finding the homogeneous transformation matrix between different robot link frames.
Digital signatures are often used to implement electronic signatures, a broader term that refers to any electronic data that carries the intent of a signature, but not all electronic signatures use digital signatures. In some countries, including the United States, India, and members of the European Union, electronic signatures have legal significance.
The document discusses various kinematic problems in robotics including forward kinematics, inverse kinematics, and Denavit-Hartenberg notation. Forward kinematics determines the pose of the end-effector given the joint angles, while inverse kinematics determines the required joint angles to achieve a desired end-effector pose. Denavit-Hartenberg notation provides a systematic way to describe the geometry of robot links and joints. The document also covers numerical solutions to inverse kinematics for robots without closed-form solutions and kinematics of special robot types like under-actuated and redundant manipulators.
The document discusses representing position and orientation of robotic systems using coordinate frames and homogeneous transformations. It introduces coordinate frames and describes how to represent position as a point and orientation as a set of axes. Rotations between frames can be represented by rotation matrices, and transformations between frames are described using homogeneous coordinates. Euler angles provide a method to represent orientation using three angles but require careful consideration of axis sequences due to non-commutativity of rotations.
1. The document discusses forward kinematics of robot manipulators. It defines key concepts like links, joints, Denavit-Hartenberg parameters, and homogeneous transformation matrices.
2. The forward kinematics problem is solved by assigning coordinate frames to each link and determining the transformation between frames using link variables and homogeneous transformations.
3. The position and orientation of the end effector is determined by multiplying the homogeneous transformation matrices representing each link transformation.
The document discusses dynamic modeling of robot manipulators using the Euler-Lagrange approach. It introduces dynamic models and the direct and inverse problems. The Euler-Lagrange approach is then explained in detail. It involves computing the kinetic and potential energies of each link based on the link masses, centers of mass, moments of inertia, and joint velocities and positions. This allows deriving the dynamic equations of motion for the manipulator.
This document discusses robot kinematics and position analysis. It covers forward and inverse kinematics, including determining the position of a robot's hand given joint variables or calculating joint variables for a desired hand position. Different coordinate systems for representing robot positions are described, including Cartesian, cylindrical and spherical coordinates. The Denavit-Hartenberg representation for modeling robot kinematics is introduced, allowing the modeling of any robot configuration using transformation matrices.
1) The Denavit-Hartenberg (D-H) convention establishes a unified approach for assigning coordinate frames to the links of a robot manipulator. It defines a transformation matrix to relate adjacent coordinate frames based on four successive transformations.
2) The D-H parameters (α, a, d, θ) are used to describe the geometry and kinematic properties of the robot. Forward kinematics uses the transformation matrices to determine the end effector pose from the joint parameters.
3) The forward kinematics solution can be obtained by calculating the homogeneous transformation matrix relating the tool frame to the base frame as the product of individual transformation matrices. This determines the position and orientation of the end effector.
1. Trajectories for robotic arms can include via points that the arm passes close to but not necessarily through. Both position and orientation of the arm need to be interpolated along the trajectory.
2. Transitions between straight line segments of a trajectory involve constant acceleration curves like parabolas. The trajectory is planned to satisfy constraints like initial and final positions, velocities, and times.
3. Rotational transitions between orientations are found similarly by defining equivalent axes of rotation and making the rotation a linear function of time along the transition.
This document summarizes robot motion analysis and kinematics. It discusses the historical perspective of robots, definitions of robots, basic robot components, robot configurations, types of joints and kinematics. It also covers topics such as transformations, rotation matrices, homogeneous transformations, and inverse kinematics of one and two link manipulators. The document provides examples and references on these topics.
1. Robot kinematics is the analytical study of robot motion without considering forces or moments. It involves representing a robot as a series of rigid links connected by joints and determining the relationship between joint positions and the end effector position and orientation.
2. There are two main kinematic tasks: direct kinematics, which determines the end effector pose given joint positions, and inverse kinematics, which determines required joint positions to achieve a desired end effector pose.
3. Direct kinematics involves matrix multiplications to transform between reference frames. Inverse kinematics is more difficult and involves solving nonlinear equations, which may have multiple or no solutions. Simplifications like decoupling subproblems can help.
This document provides an overview of the MATLAB Robotics Toolbox. It describes that the toolbox contains functions for studying robot kinematics, dynamics, trajectory generation, visualization and simulation for arm-type robots. It also contains functions for mobile robots and computer vision. The document provides instructions on how to download, install and use the toolbox to define robots, perform forward and inverse kinematics, calculate Jacobians and trajectories, and simulate robot dynamics.
A manipulator is a series of linked segments connected by actuated joints that can manipulate objects without direct contact. The Jacobian inverse allows computation of the joint velocities required to achieve a desired end effector velocity as long as the Jacobian matrix is square and non-singular. The Jacobian inverse has applications in robotics such as handling materials, surgery, space and underwater exploration, and entertainment.
The document discusses manipulator Jacobians in robotics. A manipulator Jacobian is a matrix that is used to transform the velocity of robot joints into the velocity of the end effector. It has an upper half that describes the linear velocity of the end effector and a lower half that describes the angular velocity. The Jacobian allows the relationship between joint velocities and end effector velocities to be expressed mathematically. Examples are given to demonstrate how to calculate the Jacobian for specific robot manipulators.
The document discusses manipulator kinematics, which refers to the position and orientation of a robot's end effector as a function of time, without regard to forces or mass. It describes different methods for representing an end effector's position, including joint space and world space methods. The key difference between forward and backward transformations is that forward transformation maps from joint space to world space, while backward transformation maps from world space to joint space. Accuracy refers to how well a robot can reach a desired location, while repeatability refers to how well it can return to a previously taught point.
Position analysis and dimensional synthesisPreetshah1212
This document provides an overview of position analysis and dimensional synthesis for kinematics of machines. It discusses topics such as position and displacement, dimensional synthesis, function generation, path generation, motion generation, limiting conditions like toggle positions and transmission angles, and both graphical and algebraic methods for position analysis including vector loops and the use of complex numbers. The key steps of graphical position analysis and the algebraic algorithm using Freudenstein's equation are described.
Human Arm Inverse Kinematic Solution Based Geometric Relations and Optimizati...Waqas Tariq
Kinematics for robotic systems with many degrees of freedom (DOF) and high redundancy are still an open issue. Namely, computation time in robotic applications is often too high to reach good solution, for parts of the kinematic chain; the problem of inverse kinematics is not linear, as rotations are involved. This means that analytical solutions are only available in limited situations. In all other cases, alternative methods will have to be an employed.The most-used alternative is numerical solutions optimization. This paper presents a strategy based on combine’s analytical solutions with nonlinear optimization algorithm solutions to solution the IKP. A analytical solutions is used to reduce the size of problem from seven variable of joint angle to single variable and nonlinear optimization algorithm was used to find approximate solution which make the computation time is very small
This work presents the kinematics model of an RA-
02 (a 4 DOF) robotic arm. The direct kinematic problem is
addressed using both the Denavit-Hartenberg (DH) convention
and the product of exponential formula, which is based on the
screw theory. By comparing the results of both approaches, it
turns out that they provide identical solutions for the
manipulator kinematics. Furthermore, an algebraic solution of
the inverse kinematics problem based on trigonometric
formulas is also provided. Finally, simulation results for the
kinematics model using the Matlab program based on the DH
convention are presented. Since the two approaches are
identical, the product of exponential formula is supposed to
produce same simulation results on the robotic arm studied.
Keywords-Robotics; DH convention; product of exponentials;
kinematics; simulations
1. The document discusses differential kinematics and how it can be used to examine the pose velocities of robot frames. It also covers Jacobians and how they map between joint and Cartesian space velocities.
2. Specific topics covered include differential transformations, screw velocity matrices, relating velocities in different frames, determining Jacobians for serial and parallel robots, and examining robot singularities.
3. Singularities occur when the mechanism loses mobility in certain directions and joint rates will increase near these configurations. Workarounds include tooling design, changing to joint space control near singularities, and carefully planning paths.
Robot forward and inverse kinematics research using matlab by d.sivasamySiva Samy
The document discusses developing forward and inverse kinematic models of a Scorbot era 5u plus industrial robot using MATLAB. It begins by introducing the Denavit-Hartenberg parameters for representing robot kinematics. Then it describes modeling the specific Scorbot era 5u plus robot in MATLAB, including defining its link lengths and joint ranges using DH parameters. Forward kinematics analysis is performed by varying the joint angles to find the end effector position and orientation. Validation is done by comparing the results to a commercial robot simulator and LabVIEW. Inverse kinematics analysis is also developed to determine required joint angles to achieve a desired end effector pose.
This document discusses forward and inverse kinematics, including:
1. Forward kinematics determines the position of the robot hand given joint variables, while inverse kinematics calculates joint variables for a desired hand position.
2. Homogeneous transformation matrices are used to represent frames, points, vectors and transformations in space.
3. Standard robot coordinate systems include Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical coordinates. Forward and inverse kinematics equations are provided for position analysis in each system.
This document discusses robot kinematics and various representations used to describe the position and orientation of objects in 3D space. It introduces the homogeneous transformation matrix which uses rotation and translation operators to relate coordinate frames. Different coordinate systems like Cartesian, cylindrical and spherical are covered. It also discusses Euler angles, Denavit-Hartenberg parameters and their rules for assigning coordinates to define the kinematic structure of a robot.
This document provides an introduction to robot kinematics. It discusses the basic joints used in robotics including revolute, spherical, and prismatic joints. It covers forward and inverse kinematics problems. Key concepts explained include homogeneous transformations using 4x4 matrices to represent rotations and translations between coordinate frames, and rotation matrices for transforming between 3D coordinate systems. Examples are provided for finding the homogeneous transformation matrix between different robot link frames.
Digital signatures are often used to implement electronic signatures, a broader term that refers to any electronic data that carries the intent of a signature, but not all electronic signatures use digital signatures. In some countries, including the United States, India, and members of the European Union, electronic signatures have legal significance.
The document discusses various kinematic problems in robotics including forward kinematics, inverse kinematics, and Denavit-Hartenberg notation. Forward kinematics determines the pose of the end-effector given the joint angles, while inverse kinematics determines the required joint angles to achieve a desired end-effector pose. Denavit-Hartenberg notation provides a systematic way to describe the geometry of robot links and joints. The document also covers numerical solutions to inverse kinematics for robots without closed-form solutions and kinematics of special robot types like under-actuated and redundant manipulators.
The document discusses representing position and orientation of robotic systems using coordinate frames and homogeneous transformations. It introduces coordinate frames and describes how to represent position as a point and orientation as a set of axes. Rotations between frames can be represented by rotation matrices, and transformations between frames are described using homogeneous coordinates. Euler angles provide a method to represent orientation using three angles but require careful consideration of axis sequences due to non-commutativity of rotations.
1. The document discusses forward kinematics of robot manipulators. It defines key concepts like links, joints, Denavit-Hartenberg parameters, and homogeneous transformation matrices.
2. The forward kinematics problem is solved by assigning coordinate frames to each link and determining the transformation between frames using link variables and homogeneous transformations.
3. The position and orientation of the end effector is determined by multiplying the homogeneous transformation matrices representing each link transformation.
The document discusses dynamic modeling of robot manipulators using the Euler-Lagrange approach. It introduces dynamic models and the direct and inverse problems. The Euler-Lagrange approach is then explained in detail. It involves computing the kinetic and potential energies of each link based on the link masses, centers of mass, moments of inertia, and joint velocities and positions. This allows deriving the dynamic equations of motion for the manipulator.
This document discusses robot kinematics and position analysis. It covers forward and inverse kinematics, including determining the position of a robot's hand given joint variables or calculating joint variables for a desired hand position. Different coordinate systems for representing robot positions are described, including Cartesian, cylindrical and spherical coordinates. The Denavit-Hartenberg representation for modeling robot kinematics is introduced, allowing the modeling of any robot configuration using transformation matrices.
1) The Denavit-Hartenberg (D-H) convention establishes a unified approach for assigning coordinate frames to the links of a robot manipulator. It defines a transformation matrix to relate adjacent coordinate frames based on four successive transformations.
2) The D-H parameters (α, a, d, θ) are used to describe the geometry and kinematic properties of the robot. Forward kinematics uses the transformation matrices to determine the end effector pose from the joint parameters.
3) The forward kinematics solution can be obtained by calculating the homogeneous transformation matrix relating the tool frame to the base frame as the product of individual transformation matrices. This determines the position and orientation of the end effector.
1. Trajectories for robotic arms can include via points that the arm passes close to but not necessarily through. Both position and orientation of the arm need to be interpolated along the trajectory.
2. Transitions between straight line segments of a trajectory involve constant acceleration curves like parabolas. The trajectory is planned to satisfy constraints like initial and final positions, velocities, and times.
3. Rotational transitions between orientations are found similarly by defining equivalent axes of rotation and making the rotation a linear function of time along the transition.
This document summarizes robot motion analysis and kinematics. It discusses the historical perspective of robots, definitions of robots, basic robot components, robot configurations, types of joints and kinematics. It also covers topics such as transformations, rotation matrices, homogeneous transformations, and inverse kinematics of one and two link manipulators. The document provides examples and references on these topics.
1. Robot kinematics is the analytical study of robot motion without considering forces or moments. It involves representing a robot as a series of rigid links connected by joints and determining the relationship between joint positions and the end effector position and orientation.
2. There are two main kinematic tasks: direct kinematics, which determines the end effector pose given joint positions, and inverse kinematics, which determines required joint positions to achieve a desired end effector pose.
3. Direct kinematics involves matrix multiplications to transform between reference frames. Inverse kinematics is more difficult and involves solving nonlinear equations, which may have multiple or no solutions. Simplifications like decoupling subproblems can help.
This document provides an overview of the MATLAB Robotics Toolbox. It describes that the toolbox contains functions for studying robot kinematics, dynamics, trajectory generation, visualization and simulation for arm-type robots. It also contains functions for mobile robots and computer vision. The document provides instructions on how to download, install and use the toolbox to define robots, perform forward and inverse kinematics, calculate Jacobians and trajectories, and simulate robot dynamics.
A manipulator is a series of linked segments connected by actuated joints that can manipulate objects without direct contact. The Jacobian inverse allows computation of the joint velocities required to achieve a desired end effector velocity as long as the Jacobian matrix is square and non-singular. The Jacobian inverse has applications in robotics such as handling materials, surgery, space and underwater exploration, and entertainment.
The document discusses manipulator Jacobians in robotics. A manipulator Jacobian is a matrix that is used to transform the velocity of robot joints into the velocity of the end effector. It has an upper half that describes the linear velocity of the end effector and a lower half that describes the angular velocity. The Jacobian allows the relationship between joint velocities and end effector velocities to be expressed mathematically. Examples are given to demonstrate how to calculate the Jacobian for specific robot manipulators.
The document discusses manipulator kinematics, which refers to the position and orientation of a robot's end effector as a function of time, without regard to forces or mass. It describes different methods for representing an end effector's position, including joint space and world space methods. The key difference between forward and backward transformations is that forward transformation maps from joint space to world space, while backward transformation maps from world space to joint space. Accuracy refers to how well a robot can reach a desired location, while repeatability refers to how well it can return to a previously taught point.
Position analysis and dimensional synthesisPreetshah1212
This document provides an overview of position analysis and dimensional synthesis for kinematics of machines. It discusses topics such as position and displacement, dimensional synthesis, function generation, path generation, motion generation, limiting conditions like toggle positions and transmission angles, and both graphical and algebraic methods for position analysis including vector loops and the use of complex numbers. The key steps of graphical position analysis and the algebraic algorithm using Freudenstein's equation are described.
Human Arm Inverse Kinematic Solution Based Geometric Relations and Optimizati...Waqas Tariq
Kinematics for robotic systems with many degrees of freedom (DOF) and high redundancy are still an open issue. Namely, computation time in robotic applications is often too high to reach good solution, for parts of the kinematic chain; the problem of inverse kinematics is not linear, as rotations are involved. This means that analytical solutions are only available in limited situations. In all other cases, alternative methods will have to be an employed.The most-used alternative is numerical solutions optimization. This paper presents a strategy based on combine’s analytical solutions with nonlinear optimization algorithm solutions to solution the IKP. A analytical solutions is used to reduce the size of problem from seven variable of joint angle to single variable and nonlinear optimization algorithm was used to find approximate solution which make the computation time is very small
This work presents the kinematics model of an RA-
02 (a 4 DOF) robotic arm. The direct kinematic problem is
addressed using both the Denavit-Hartenberg (DH) convention
and the product of exponential formula, which is based on the
screw theory. By comparing the results of both approaches, it
turns out that they provide identical solutions for the
manipulator kinematics. Furthermore, an algebraic solution of
the inverse kinematics problem based on trigonometric
formulas is also provided. Finally, simulation results for the
kinematics model using the Matlab program based on the DH
convention are presented. Since the two approaches are
identical, the product of exponential formula is supposed to
produce same simulation results on the robotic arm studied.
Keywords-Robotics; DH convention; product of exponentials;
kinematics; simulations
Abstract— To be able to control a robot manipulator as.docxaryan532920
Abstract— To be able to control a robot manipulator as required
by its operation, it is important to consider the kinematic model in
design of the control algorithm. In robotics, the kinematic
descriptions of manipulators and their assigned tasks are utilized to
set up the fundamental equations for dynamics and control.. The
objective of this paper is to derive the complete forward kinematic
model (analytical and numerical) of a 6 DOF robotic arm (LR Mate
200iC from Fanuc Robotics) and validate it with the data provided by
robot’s software.
Keywords — forward kinematic, Denavit-Hartenberg parameters,
Robotic Toolbox
I. INTRODUCTION
Kinematics is the science of geometry in motion. It is
restricted to a pure geometrical description of motion by
means of position, orientation, and their time derivatives. In
robotics, the kinematic descriptions of manipulators and their
assigned tasks are utilized to set up the fundamental equations
for dynamics and control [1]. These non-linear equations are
used to map the joint parameters to the configuration of the
robot system. The Denavit and Hartenberg notation [2],[3]
gives us a standard methodology to write the kinematic
equations of a manipulator. This is especially useful for serial
manipulators where a matrix is used to represent the pose
(position and orientation) of one body with respect to another.
There are two important aspects in kinematic analysis of
robots: the Forward Kinematics problem and the Inverse
Kinematics problem. Forward kinematics refers to the use of
the kinematic equations of a robot to compute the position of
the end-effector from specified values for the joint parameters
Inverse kinematics refers to the use of the kinematics equations
of a robot to determine the joint parameters that provide a
desired position of the end-effector.
The purpose of this paper is to obtain the forward
kinematic analysis for the Fanuc LR Mate 200iC Robot, to
make model of robot using Robotic Toolbox® for MATLAB®
and validate it with the data provided by robot’s software. The
information can be use in the future design and production of
Daniel Constantin is with Military Technical Academy, Bucharest,
Romania; 39-49 George Cosbuc Blv., 050141, phone +40213354660; fax:
+40213355763; e-mail: [email protected]
Marin Lupoae is with Military Technical Academy, Bucharest, Romania;
e-mail: [email protected]
Cătălin Baciu is with Military Technical Academy, Bucharest, Romania;
e-mail: [email protected]
Dan-Ilie Buliga is with Military Technical Academy, Bucharest, Romania;
e-mail: [email protected]
the robot to make it faster and more accurate postwar period
for the defensive works executed in different countries around
the globe.
II. THEORETICAL ASPECTS
The forward kinematics problem is concerned with the
relationship between the individual joints of the robot
manipulator and the position and orientation of the tool or end-
effector.
A s ...
Forward and Inverse Kinematic Analysis of Robotic ManipulatorsIRJET Journal
The document discusses forward and inverse kinematic analysis of 5 DOF and 6 DOF robotic manipulators. It presents the Denavit-Hartenberg (DH) parameter modeling approach to determine the homogeneous transformation matrices between links to solve the forward kinematics. The inverse kinematics is solved by multiplying the inverse of the transformation matrices and equating the end effector positions and orientations. Results for 5 DOF manipulator show the joint values that provide different end effector positions and orientations.
Forward and Inverse Kinematic Analysis of Robotic ManipulatorsIRJET Journal
The document discusses forward and inverse kinematic analysis of 5 DOF and 6 DOF robotic manipulators. It presents the Denavit-Hartenberg parameters to model the link lengths, twist angles, offsets etc. of the manipulators. Forward kinematics is used to calculate the position and orientation of the end effector given the joint angles, while inverse kinematics is used to determine the required joint angles to achieve a desired end effector pose. Results for a 5 DOF manipulator using forward and inverse kinematic equations are presented.
Insect inspired hexapod robot for terrain navigationeSAT Journals
Abstract The aim of this paper is to build a sixlegged walking robot that is capable of basicmobility tasks such as walking forward, backward, rotating in place and raising orlowering the body height. The legs will be of a modular design and will have threedegrees of freedom each. This robot will serve as a platform onto which additionalsensory components could be added, or which could be programmed to performincreasingly complex motions. This report discusses the components that make up ourfinal design.In this paper we have selected ahexapod robot; we are focusing &developingmainly on efficient navigation method indifferent terrain using opposite gait of locomotion, which will make it faster and at sametime energy efficient to navigate and negotiate difficult terrain.This paper discuss the Features, development, and implementation of the Hexapod robot Index Terms:Biologically inspired, Gait Generation,Legged hexapod, Navigation.
This document describes robot kinematics and the forward kinematics of a 2-link robot. It introduces Denavit-Hartenberg parameters for describing robot links and joints. A 2-link robot is modeled using these parameters and its forward kinematics are computed using homogeneous transformations. The robot and its kinematics can be visualized using MATLAB.
Solution of Inverse Kinematics for SCARA Manipulator Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuz...ijsc
Solution of inverse kinematic equations is complex problem, the complexity comes from the nonlinearity of joint space and Cartesian space mapping and having multiple solution. In this work, four adaptive neurofuzzy networks ANFIS are implemented to solve the inverse kinematics of 4-DOF SCARA manipulator. The implementation of ANFIS is easy, and the simulation of it shows that it is very fast and give acceptable error.
Inverse Kinematics Analysis for Manipulator Robot with Wrist Offset Based On ...Waqas Tariq
This paper presents an algorithm to solve the inverse kinematics for a six degree of freedom (6 DOF) manipulator robot with wrist offset. This type of robot has a complex inverse kinematics, which needs a long time for such calculation. The proposed algorithm starts from find the wrist point by vectors computation then compute the first three joint angles and after that compute the wrist angles by analytic solution. This algorithm is tested for the TQ MA2000 manipulator robot as case study. The obtained results was compared with results of rotational vector algorithm where both algorithms have the same accuracy but the proposed algorithm saving round about 99.6% of the computation time required by the rotational vector algorithm, which leads to used this algorithm in real time robot control.
IJRET : International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology is an international peer reviewed, online journal published by eSAT Publishing House for the enhancement of research in various disciplines of Engineering and Technology. The aim and scope of the journal is to provide an academic medium and an important reference for the advancement and dissemination of research results that support high-level learning, teaching and research in the fields of Engineering and Technology. We bring together Scientists, Academician, Field Engineers, Scholars and Students of related fields of Engineering and Technology.
A New Method For Solving Kinematics Model Of An RA-02IJERA Editor
The kinematics miniature are established for a 4 DOF robotic arm. Denavit-Hartenberg (DH) convention and the
product of exponential formula are used for solving kinematic problem based on screw theory. For acquiring
simple matrix for inverse kinematics a new simple method is derived by solving problems like robot base
movement, actuator restoration. Simulations are done by using MATlab programming for the kinematics
exemplary.
Research on The Control of Joint Robot TrajectoryIJRESJOURNAL
ABSTRACT: This paper relates to a Robot that belongs to the category of Joint Robot.In the article,we analyze the path planning and control system of the robot,specifically speaking,it involves the interpolation of the robot trajectory, the analysis of the inverse kinematics, the introduction of the method to reduce the trajectory error, the optimization of the trajectory and in the end, the corresponding control system is designed according to the relevant parameters. This research project first introduces the importance of the robot, and then analyzes the whole process of the robot from the grasping pin, the screw to they are delivered to the designated position,finally, the process is introduced in detail, and the simulation result is displayed.
Solution of Inverse Kinematics for SCARA Manipulator Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuz...ijsc
Solution of inverse kinematic equations is complex problem, the complexity comes from the nonlinearity of joint space and Cartesian space mapping and having multiple solution. In this work, four adaptive neurofuzzy networks ANFIS are implemented to solve the inverse kinematics of 4-DOF SCARA manipulator. The implementation of ANFIS is easy, and the simulation of it shows that it is very fast and give acceptable
error.
FORWARD KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF A ROBOTIC MANIPULATOR WITH TRIANGULAR PRISM STR...IAEME Publication
To control robot manipulators as per the requirement, it is important to consider its kinematic model. In robotics, we use the kinematic relations of manipulators to set up the fundamental equations for dynamics and control. The objective of this paper is to introduce triangular prism structured manipulator and derive the forward kinematic model using Denavit-Hartenberg representation.
This document presents an inverse kinematics solution method for an 11 degree-of-freedom biped robot. It describes the mechanical design of the biped robot, which consists of 5 links per leg connected by revolute joints, as well as a link for the torso. It then establishes a kinematic model using Denavit-Hartenberg parameters to define the coordinate frames of each link. The document proposes an inverse kinematics approach that views each leg in reverse order to derive closed-form solutions for the joint angles based on the desired end effector position and orientation. Geometric relationships are used to formulate equations to solve for the hip, knee, and ankle joint angles of each leg given the position of the foot.
Inverse Kinematics Solution for Biped RobotIOSR Journals
This document presents an inverse kinematics solution method for an 11 degree-of-freedom biped robot. It describes the mechanical design of the biped robot, which consists of 5 links per leg connected by revolute joints, as well as a link for the torso. It then establishes a kinematic model using Denavit-Hartenberg parameters to define the coordinate frames of each link. The document proposes an inverse kinematics approach that views each leg in reverse order to derive closed-form solutions for the joint angles based on the desired end effector position and orientation. Geometric relationships are used to formulate equations to solve for the hip, knee, and ankle joint angles of each leg given the position of the foot.
The document describes the forward kinematics analysis of a 6 degree of freedom arc welding robot. It discusses assigning coordinate frames to each link using the Denavit-Hartenberg convention. The forward kinematics problem is to determine the position and orientation of the end effector given the joint variable values. The methodology develops a kinematic model in Matlab using the link transformations. For example joint values, the model outputs the end effector position and orientation as represented by a homogeneous transformation matrix. The analysis can determine the end effector pose for any given joint configuration.
This document describes the design and analysis of a planar positioning stage based on a redundantly actuated parallel linkage. The positioning stage has three degrees of freedom (x-y-θ) and uses a 3-PRPR linkage with six actuators. The document analyzes the kinematics and workspace of the linkage. It describes the procedure for static analysis to calculate the actuated joint torques. The positioning stage could enable high-precision motion with a compact design and improved stiffness compared to serial linkages. It is proposed for potential use in micro-scale applications.
This document describes the design and analysis of a planar positioning stage based on a redundantly actuated parallel linkage with six degrees of freedom (three translations and three rotations). The kinematics and workspace analysis of the linkage are presented. A static analysis method to calculate the actuator torques required for a given end-effector force and trajectory is also described. MATLAB programs were developed to analyze the workspace and perform the static analysis. The results show that the redundant actuation can help improve the workspace characteristics and prevent singular configurations compared to non-redundant parallel manipulators. The stage design has potential applications in micro-positioning.
This document presents the forward and inverse kinematic analysis and dynamic analysis of a 2 degree of freedom robotic arm manipulator. It includes:
- Deriving the forward kinematics equations relating joint angles to end effector position.
- Determining the inverse kinematics and discussing issues like multiple solutions and singularities.
- Analyzing the manipulator performance in terms of condition number, mobility index, and singular configurations.
- Modeling the dynamics using Lagrangian and Newton-Euler approaches and deriving the equations of motion relating joint torques to accelerations.
Similar to Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic Robotics Finger Mechanisms (20)
This document provides a technical review of secure banking using RSA and AES encryption methodologies. It discusses how RSA and AES are commonly used encryption standards for secure data transmission between ATMs and bank servers. The document first provides background on ATM security measures and risks of attacks. It then reviews related work analyzing encryption techniques. The document proposes using a one-time password in addition to a PIN for ATM authentication. It concludes that implementing encryption standards like RSA and AES can make transactions more secure and build trust in online banking.
This document analyzes the performance of various modulation schemes for achieving energy efficient communication over fading channels in wireless sensor networks. It finds that for long transmission distances, low-order modulations like BPSK are optimal due to their lower SNR requirements. However, as transmission distance decreases, higher-order modulations like 16-QAM and 64-QAM become more optimal since they can transmit more bits per symbol, outweighing their higher SNR needs. Simulations show lifetime extensions up to 550% are possible in short-range networks by using higher-order modulations instead of just BPSK. The optimal modulation depends on transmission distance and balancing the energy used by electronic components versus power amplifiers.
This document provides a review of mobility management techniques in vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs). It discusses three modes of communication in VANETs: vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I), vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), and hybrid vehicle (HV) communication. For each communication mode, different mobility management schemes are required due to their unique characteristics. The document also discusses mobility management challenges in VANETs and outlines some open research issues in improving mobility management for seamless communication in these dynamic networks.
This document provides a review of different techniques for segmenting brain MRI images to detect tumors. It compares the K-means and Fuzzy C-means clustering algorithms. K-means is an exclusive clustering algorithm that groups data points into distinct clusters, while Fuzzy C-means is an overlapping clustering algorithm that allows data points to belong to multiple clusters. The document finds that Fuzzy C-means requires more time for brain tumor detection compared to other methods like hierarchical clustering or K-means. It also reviews related work applying these clustering algorithms to segment brain MRI images.
1) The document simulates and compares the performance of AODV and DSDV routing protocols in a mobile ad hoc network under three conditions: when users are fixed, when users move towards the base station, and when users move away from the base station.
2) The results show that both protocols have higher packet delivery and lower packet loss when users are either fixed or moving towards the base station, since signal strength is better in those scenarios. Performance degrades when users move away from the base station due to weaker signals.
3) AODV generally has better performance than DSDV, with higher throughput and packet delivery rates observed across the different user mobility conditions.
This document describes the design and implementation of 4-bit QPSK and 256-bit QAM modulation techniques using MATLAB. It compares the two techniques based on SNR, BER, and efficiency. The key steps of implementing each technique in MATLAB are outlined, including generating random bits, modulation, adding noise, and measuring BER. Simulation results show scatter plots and eye diagrams of the modulated signals. A table compares the results, showing that 256-bit QAM provides better performance than 4-bit QPSK. The document concludes that QAM modulation is more effective for digital transmission systems.
The document proposes a hybrid technique using Anisotropic Scale Invariant Feature Transform (A-SIFT) and Robust Ensemble Support Vector Machine (RESVM) to accurately identify faces in images. A-SIFT improves upon traditional SIFT by applying anisotropic scaling to extract richer directional keypoints. Keypoints are processed with RESVM and hypothesis testing to increase accuracy above 95% by repeatedly reprocessing images until the threshold is met. The technique was tested on similar and different facial images and achieved better results than SIFT in retrieval time and reduced keypoints.
This document studies the effects of dielectric superstrate thickness on microstrip patch antenna parameters. Three types of probes-fed patch antennas (rectangular, circular, and square) were designed to operate at 2.4 GHz using Arlondiclad 880 substrate. The antennas were tested with and without an Arlondiclad 880 superstrate of varying thicknesses. It was found that adding a superstrate slightly degraded performance by lowering the resonant frequency and increasing return loss and VSWR, while decreasing bandwidth and gain. Specifically, increasing the superstrate thickness or dielectric constant resulted in greater changes to the antenna parameters.
This document describes a wireless environment monitoring system that utilizes soil energy as a sustainable power source for wireless sensors. The system uses a microbial fuel cell to generate electricity from the microbial activity in soil. Two microbial fuel cells were created using different soil types and various additives to produce different current and voltage outputs. An electronic circuit was designed on a printed circuit board with components like a microcontroller and ZigBee transceiver. Sensors for temperature and humidity were connected to the circuit to monitor the environment wirelessly. The system provides a low-cost way to power remote sensors without needing battery replacement and avoids the high costs of wiring a power source.
1) The document proposes a model for a frequency tunable inverted-F antenna that uses ferrite material.
2) The resonant frequency of the antenna can be significantly shifted from 2.41GHz to 3.15GHz, a 31% shift, by increasing the static magnetic field placed on the ferrite material.
3) Altering the permeability of the ferrite allows tuning of the antenna's resonant frequency without changing the physical dimensions, providing flexibility to operate over a wide frequency range.
This document summarizes a research paper that presents a speech enhancement method using stationary wavelet transform. The method first classifies speech into voiced, unvoiced, and silence regions based on short-time energy. It then applies different thresholding techniques to the wavelet coefficients of each region - modified hard thresholding for voiced speech, semi-soft thresholding for unvoiced speech, and setting coefficients to zero for silence. Experimental results using speech from the TIMIT database corrupted with white Gaussian noise at various SNR levels show improved performance over other popular denoising methods.
This document reviews the design of an energy-optimized wireless sensor node that encrypts data for transmission. It discusses how sensing schemes that group nodes into clusters and transmit aggregated data can reduce energy consumption compared to individual node transmissions. The proposed node design calculates the minimum transmission power needed based on received signal strength and uses a periodic sleep/wake cycle to optimize energy when not sensing or transmitting. It aims to encrypt data at both the node and network level to further optimize energy usage for wireless communication.
This document discusses group consumption modes. It analyzes factors that impact group consumption, including external environmental factors like technological developments enabling new forms of online and offline interactions, as well as internal motivational factors at both the group and individual level. The document then proposes that group consumption modes can be divided into four types based on two dimensions: vertical (group relationship intensity) and horizontal (consumption action period). These four types are instrument-oriented, information-oriented, enjoyment-oriented, and relationship-oriented consumption modes. Finally, the document notes that consumption modes are dynamic and can evolve over time.
The document summarizes a study of different microstrip patch antenna configurations with slotted ground planes. Three antenna designs were proposed and their performance evaluated through simulation: a conventional square patch, an elliptical patch, and a star-shaped patch. All antennas were mounted on an FR4 substrate. The effects of adding different slot patterns to the ground plane on resonance frequency, bandwidth, gain and efficiency were analyzed parametrically. Key findings were that reshaping the patch and adding slots increased bandwidth and shifted resonance frequency. The elliptical and star patches in particular performed better than the conventional design. Three antenna configurations were selected for fabrication and measurement based on the simulations: a conventional patch with a slot under the patch, an elliptical patch with slots
1) The document describes a study conducted to improve call drop rates in a GSM network through RF optimization.
2) Drive testing was performed before and after optimization using TEMS software to record network parameters like RxLevel, RxQuality, and events.
3) Analysis found call drops were occurring due to issues like handover failures between sectors, interference from adjacent channels, and overshooting due to antenna tilt.
4) Corrective actions taken included defining neighbors between sectors, adjusting frequencies to reduce interference, and lowering the mechanical tilt of an antenna.
5) Post-optimization drive testing showed improvements in RxLevel, RxQuality, and a reduction in dropped calls.
This document describes the design of an intelligent autonomous wheeled robot that uses RF transmission for communication. The robot has two modes - automatic mode where it can make its own decisions, and user control mode where a user can control it remotely. It is designed using a microcontroller and can perform tasks like object recognition using computer vision and color detection in MATLAB, as well as wall painting using pneumatic systems. The robot's movement is controlled by DC motors and it uses sensors like ultrasonic sensors and gas sensors to navigate autonomously. RF transmission allows communication between the robot and a remote control unit. The overall aim is to develop a low-cost robotic system for industrial applications like material handling.
This document reviews cryptography techniques to secure the Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing protocol in mobile ad-hoc networks. It discusses various types of attacks on AODV like impersonation, denial of service, eavesdropping, black hole attacks, wormhole attacks, and Sybil attacks. It then proposes using the RC6 cryptography algorithm to secure AODV by encrypting data packets and detecting and removing malicious nodes launching black hole attacks. Simulation results show that after applying RC6, the packet delivery ratio and throughput of AODV increase while delay decreases, improving the security and performance of the network under attack.
The document describes a proposed modification to the conventional Booth multiplier that aims to increase its speed by applying concepts from Vedic mathematics. Specifically, it utilizes the Urdhva Tiryakbhyam formula to generate all partial products concurrently rather than sequentially. The proposed 8x8 bit multiplier was coded in VHDL, simulated, and found to have a path delay 44.35% lower than a conventional Booth multiplier, demonstrating its potential for higher speed.
This document discusses image deblurring techniques. It begins by introducing image restoration and focusing on image deblurring. It then discusses challenges with image deblurring being an ill-posed problem. It reviews existing approaches to screen image deconvolution including estimating point spread functions and iteratively estimating blur kernels and sharp images. The document also discusses handling spatially variant blur and summarizes the relationship between the proposed method and previous work for different blur types. It proposes using color filters in the aperture to exploit parallax cues for segmentation and blur estimation. Finally, it proposes moving the image sensor circularly during exposure to prevent high frequency attenuation from motion blur.
This document describes modeling an adaptive controller for an aircraft roll control system using PID, fuzzy-PID, and genetic algorithm. It begins by introducing the aircraft roll control system and motivation for developing an adaptive controller to minimize errors from noisy analog sensor signals. It then provides the mathematical model of aircraft roll dynamics and describes modeling the real-time flight control system in MATLAB/Simulink. The document evaluates PID, fuzzy-PID, and PID-GA (genetic algorithm) controllers for aircraft roll control and finds that the PID-GA controller delivers the best performance.
Introduction- e - waste – definition - sources of e-waste– hazardous substances in e-waste - effects of e-waste on environment and human health- need for e-waste management– e-waste handling rules - waste minimization techniques for managing e-waste – recycling of e-waste - disposal treatment methods of e- waste – mechanism of extraction of precious metal from leaching solution-global Scenario of E-waste – E-waste in India- case studies.
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODELgerogepatton
As digital technology becomes more deeply embedded in power systems, protecting the communication
networks of Smart Grids (SG) has emerged as a critical concern. Distributed Network Protocol 3 (DNP3)
represents a multi-tiered application layer protocol extensively utilized in Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition (SCADA)-based smart grids to facilitate real-time data gathering and control functionalities.
Robust Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are necessary for early threat detection and mitigation because
of the interconnection of these networks, which makes them vulnerable to a variety of cyberattacks. To
solve this issue, this paper develops a hybrid Deep Learning (DL) model specifically designed for intrusion
detection in smart grids. The proposed approach is a combination of the Convolutional Neural Network
(CNN) and the Long-Short-Term Memory algorithms (LSTM). We employed a recent intrusion detection
dataset (DNP3), which focuses on unauthorized commands and Denial of Service (DoS) cyberattacks, to
train and test our model. The results of our experiments show that our CNN-LSTM method is much better
at finding smart grid intrusions than other deep learning algorithms used for classification. In addition,
our proposed approach improves accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, achieving a high detection
accuracy rate of 99.50%.
Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapte...University of Maribor
Slides from talk presenting:
Aleš Zamuda: Presentation of IEEE Slovenia CIS (Computational Intelligence Society) Chapter and Networking.
Presentation at IcETRAN 2024 session:
"Inter-Society Networking Panel GRSS/MTT-S/CIS
Panel Session: Promoting Connection and Cooperation"
IEEE Slovenia GRSS
IEEE Serbia and Montenegro MTT-S
IEEE Slovenia CIS
11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC AND COMPUTING ENGINEERING
3-6 June 2024, Niš, Serbia
Using recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) for pavements is crucial to achieving sustainability. Implementing RCA for new pavement can minimize carbon footprint, conserve natural resources, reduce harmful emissions, and lower life cycle costs. Compared to natural aggregate (NA), RCA pavement has fewer comprehensive studies and sustainability assessments.
Comparative analysis between traditional aquaponics and reconstructed aquapon...bijceesjournal
The aquaponic system of planting is a method that does not require soil usage. It is a method that only needs water, fish, lava rocks (a substitute for soil), and plants. Aquaponic systems are sustainable and environmentally friendly. Its use not only helps to plant in small spaces but also helps reduce artificial chemical use and minimizes excess water use, as aquaponics consumes 90% less water than soil-based gardening. The study applied a descriptive and experimental design to assess and compare conventional and reconstructed aquaponic methods for reproducing tomatoes. The researchers created an observation checklist to determine the significant factors of the study. The study aims to determine the significant difference between traditional aquaponics and reconstructed aquaponics systems propagating tomatoes in terms of height, weight, girth, and number of fruits. The reconstructed aquaponics system’s higher growth yield results in a much more nourished crop than the traditional aquaponics system. It is superior in its number of fruits, height, weight, and girth measurement. Moreover, the reconstructed aquaponics system is proven to eliminate all the hindrances present in the traditional aquaponics system, which are overcrowding of fish, algae growth, pest problems, contaminated water, and dead fish.
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming PipelinesChristina Lin
Traditionally, dealing with real-time data pipelines has involved significant overhead, even for straightforward tasks like data transformation or masking. However, in this talk, we’ll venture into the dynamic realm of WebAssembly (WASM) and discover how it can revolutionize the creation of stateless streaming pipelines within a Kafka (Redpanda) broker. These pipelines are adept at managing low-latency, high-data-volume scenarios.
Electric vehicle and photovoltaic advanced roles in enhancing the financial p...IJECEIAES
Climate change's impact on the planet forced the United Nations and governments to promote green energies and electric transportation. The deployments of photovoltaic (PV) and electric vehicle (EV) systems gained stronger momentum due to their numerous advantages over fossil fuel types. The advantages go beyond sustainability to reach financial support and stability. The work in this paper introduces the hybrid system between PV and EV to support industrial and commercial plants. This paper covers the theoretical framework of the proposed hybrid system including the required equation to complete the cost analysis when PV and EV are present. In addition, the proposed design diagram which sets the priorities and requirements of the system is presented. The proposed approach allows setup to advance their power stability, especially during power outages. The presented information supports researchers and plant owners to complete the necessary analysis while promoting the deployment of clean energy. The result of a case study that represents a dairy milk farmer supports the theoretical works and highlights its advanced benefits to existing plants. The short return on investment of the proposed approach supports the paper's novelty approach for the sustainable electrical system. In addition, the proposed system allows for an isolated power setup without the need for a transmission line which enhances the safety of the electrical network
Electric vehicle and photovoltaic advanced roles in enhancing the financial p...
Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic Robotics Finger Mechanisms
1. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE)
e-ISSN: 2278-1684 Volume 6, Issue 1 (Mar. - Apr. 2013), PP 66-72
www.iosrjournals.org
www.iosrjournals.org 66 | Page
Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic Robotics Finger
Mechanisms
Abdul Haseeb Zaidy1
, Wasim Akram2
, P. Tauseef Ahmad 3
, Mohd. Parvez4
1
(Research Scholar, Mechanical Engg. Department,AFSET Dhauj Faridabad , India
2
(Research Scholar, Mechanical Engg. Department,AFSET Dhauj Faridabad , India
3
(Research Scholar, Mechanical Engg. Department,AFSET Dhauj Faridabad , India
4
(Research Scholar, Mechanical Engg. Department,AFSET Dhauj Faridabad , India
Abstract: Research on Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic robotics Finger mechanisms is being carried out
to accommodate a variety of tasks such as grasping and manipulation of objects in the field of industrial
applications, service robots, and rehabilitation robots. The first step in realizing a fully functional of
anthropomorphic robotics Finger mechanisms is kinematic modeling. In this paper, a Kinematic Model of
Anthropomorphic robotics Finger mechanism is proposed based on the biological equivalent of human hand
where each links interconnect at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and distal
interphalangeal (DIP) joints respectively. The Kinematic modeling was carried out using Denavit Hartenburg
(DH) algorithm for the proposed of Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic robotics Finger mechanisms.
Index Terms— Anthropomorphic robot Finger, Modeling, Robotics, Simulation
I. Introduction
Among the vast applications of robotics, robotic assistance in human daily life and has been the major
factor that contributes to its development. The focus on the anthropomorphism robotic limbs is currently
undergoing a very rapid development. The creation of a multifingered anthropomorphic robotic hand is a
challenge that demands innovative integration of mechanical, electronics, control and embedded software
designs.
II. Literature Review -
The normal human hand has a set of hand which includes palm and fingers. There are five fingers in each
hand, where each finger has three different phalanxes: Proximal, Middle and Distal Phalanxes. These three
phalanxes are separated by two joints, called the Interphalangeal joints (IP joints). The IP joints function like
hinges for bending and straightening the fingers and the thumb. The IP joint closest to the palm is called the
Metacarpals joint (MCP). Next to the MCP joint is the Proximal IP joint (PIP) which is in between the Proximal
and Middle Phalanx of a finger. The joint at the end of the finger is called the Distal IP joint (DIP). Both PIP
and DIP joints have one Degree of Freedom (DOF) owing to rotational movement [7]. The thumb is a complex
physical structure among the fingers and only has one IP joint between the two thumb phalanxes. Except for the
thumb, the other four fingers (index, middle, ring and pinky) have similar structures in terms of kinematics and
dynamics features. Average range of motion among the four fingers for flexion-extension movement is 650 at
the DIP joint, 1000 at the PIP joint and 800 at the MCP joint while the abduction-adduction angles for the
index finger has been measured as 200 at the MCP joint[7,8]. Figure 1 illustrates the structure of a human
finger.
Fig.1: Structure of Human Finger
2. Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic robotics Finger mechanisms
www.iosrjournals.org 67 | Page
III. KINEMATIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ADJACENT LINKS
In 1955, Denavit and Hartenberg[1] published a paper in the ASME journal of applied mechanics that
was later used to represent and model space mechanism and to derive their eq. o motion. The DH model of
representation is a very simple way of modeling space mechanism links and joints that can be used for any space
mechanism configuration, regardless of its sequence or complexity. It can also be used to represent
transformation in any coordinates such as Cartesian, cylindrical, spherical, Euler and RPY.[2,3,4,5,6]
Kinematic modeling of space mechanism describe by D-H Notation. There are four D-H parameters-
two link parameters (ai , αi) and two joint parameters (di,θi)- are defined as:
(a) Link Length (ai) –Distance measured along xi-axis from the point of intersection of xi-axis with zi-1 axis to
the origin of frame {i}, that is , distance CD.
(b) Link twist (αi) – angle between zi-1 and zi axes measured about xi axes in the right hand sense.
(c) Joint distance (di)- distance measured along zi-1 from the origin of frame{i-1} (point B) to the intersection
of xi axis with zi-1 axis (point C) that is, distance BC
(d) Joint angle (θi)- angle between xi-1 and xi axes measured about the zi-1 axis in the right hand sense.
This notation is presented in this section and followed throughout the text Denavit and Hartenberg
Representation.
First, we need to define a representation of position and orientation (pose) of one body relative to
another, in the form of our transformation matrix. There are any number of general ways to do this, and several
accepted conventions for doing this. In serial robotics, the Denavit and Hartenberg representation is the
standard for position kinematics. In the Denavit and Hartenberg (D&H) convention, a general transformation
between two bodies is defined as the product of four basic transformations: a rotation about the initial z axis
by q, a translation along the initial z axis by d, a translation along the new x axis by a, and a rotation about the
new x axis by a.
Notice now that we are able to define the general pose of one body with respect to another with only 4
parameters, q, d, a, and a instead of 6 which we would expect.[7] This is due to a careful choice for attaching
these frames in the D-H convention and shown here.
Consider two general space mechanism links connected with joints as shown fig.2 here.
Fig.2: Joint-Link Parameters
IV. Matlab Programming
In order to obtain eq. (2), the symbolic operations have to be performed in MATLAB. For that the
following commands are used;
>syms bi thi8 ai ali;
>tbm=[1,0,0,0;0,1,0,0;0,1,bi;0,0,0,1];
>tthm=[cos(thi0,-sin(thi),0,0;sin(thi),cos(thi),0,0;0,0,1,0;0,0,0,1];
>tam=[1,0,0,ai;0,1,0,0;0,0,1,0;0,0,0,1];
>talm=[1,0,0,0;0,cos(ali),-sin(ali),0;0,sin(ali),cos(ali),0;0,0,0,1];
>tim=tbm*tthm*tam8talm
Tim=
[cos(thi),sin(thi)*cos(ali),in(thi)*sin(ali), cos(thi)*ai]
[sin(thi),cos(thi)*cos(ali)-cos(thi)*sin(ali), sin(thi)*ai]
3. Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic robotics Finger mechanisms
www.iosrjournals.org 68 | Page
[ 0, sin(ali), os(ali), bi]
[ 0, 0, 0, 1]
Where command „syms‟ are used to define the symbolic variables,‟bi‟ „thi,‟ „ai,‟ and „ali‟ for the DH parameter
bi, θi, ai, and αi respectively. Moreover,the notations,‟tbm,‟ „tthm,‟ and „talm‟ are used to represent thye
matrices Tb,Tθ ,Ta and Tα, given by eqs.(2),respectively.finally, the resultant matrix Ti, denoted as‟tim‟ in the
MATLAB environment, is evaluated above, which matches with eq.(2).[10]
V. MODELING OF FINGER MECHANISM
The convention outlined above does not result in a unique attachment of frames to links because
alternative choices are available. For example: Joint axes i have two choices for direction to point zi-axis, one
pointing upward (as in fig.2) and other pointing downward. To minimize such options and get a consistent set of
frames, an algorithm 1.1 is presented below to assign frames to all links of a space mechanism.
Algorithm 1.1
This algorithm assigns frames and determines the DH-parameters for each link of an n-DOF
manipulator .Both, the first link 0 and the last link n, are connected to only one other link and, thus, have more
arbitrariness in frame assignment. For this reason, the first (frame{0})and the last (frame{n}) frames are
assigned after assigning frames to intermediate links, link 1 to link(n-1).The displacement of each joint-link is
measured with respect to a frame; therefore the zero position of each link needs to be clearly defined. The zero
position for a revolute joint is when the joint angle θ is zero, while for a prismatic joint it is when the joint
displacement is minimal; it may or may not be zero. When all the joints are in zero position, the manipulator is
said to be in home position. Thus, the home position of an n-DOF manipulator is the position where the n x 1
vector of joint variables is equal to the zero vector, that is ,qi=0 for i=1,2,……,n.
Before assigning frames, the zero position of each joint, that is, the home position of the manipulator
must be decided. The frames are then assigned imagining the manipulator in home position. Because of
mechanical constraints, the range of joint motion possible is restricted and, in some cases, this may result in a
home position that is unreachable. In such cases, the home position is redefined by changing the initial
manipulator joint positions and/or frame assignments. The new home position can be obtained by adding a
constant value to the joint angle in case of revolute joint and to the joint displacement in case of prismatic joint.
This shifting of the home position is illustrated in design project, 6- DOF space mechanism.
The algorithm is divided into four parts. The first segment gives steps for labeling scheme and the
second one describes the steps for frame assignment to intermediate links 1 to (n-1). The third and fourth
segments give steps for frame {0} and frame {n} assignment, respectively.
Step 0 Identify and number the joints starting with base and ending with end-effector. Number the links from 0
to n starting with immobile base as 0 and ending with last link as n.
Step 1 Align axis zi with axis of joint (i+1)for i= 0,1,……,n-1.
Assigning frames to intermediate links- link 1 to link (n-1) For each link repeat steps 2and3.
Step 2 The xi-axis is fixed perpendicular to both zi-1 –and zi-axes and points away from zi-1. The origin of
frame {i} is located at the intersection of zi- and xi-axes. Three situations are possible:
Case (1) if zi-1-axes intersect; choose the origin at the point or their intersection. The xi-axis will
be perpendicular to the plane containing zi-1-and zi-axes. This will give ai to be zero.
Case (2) If zi-1-and zi-axes are parallel or lie in parallel planes then their common normal is not
uniquely defined. If joint t is revolute then xi –axis is chosen along that common normal, which passes through
origin of frame {i-1}. This will fix the origin and make di zero .if joint I is prismatic, xi-axis is located distal end
of the link i.
Case(3) if Zi-1 and zi-axis coincide ,the origin lies on the common axis. if joint I is revolute, origin is
located to coincide with origin of frame{i-1} and xi-axis coincide with xi-1 axis coincide with xi-1 axis to cause
di to be zero. if joint I is prismatic, xi-axis to cause di to be 0. If joint I is prismatic, xi-axis is chosen parallel to
xi-1 axis to make ai to be 0. The origin is located at distal end of link i.
Step3 the yi-axis has no choice and is fixed to right –handed orthonormal coordinate frame {i}. Assigning
frame to link 09, the immobile base-frame {0}
Step4 The frame {0} location is arbitrary. Its choice is made based on simplification of the model and
some convenient reference in workspace. The x0-axis, which is perpendicular to z0-axis, is chosen to be parallel
to xi-axis in the home position to make θ1=0. The origin of frame {0} is located based on type of joint 1. If joint
1 is revolute, the origin of frame {0} can be chosen at a convenient reference such as, floor, work table, and so
on, giving a constant value for parameter d1 zero.
If joint 1 is prismatic, parallel x0-and x1-axes will makeθ1to be zero and origin of frame {0} is placed
arbitrarily.
Step 5 The yo-axis completes the right-handed orthonormal coordinate frame {0}.
4. Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic robotics Finger mechanisms
www.iosrjournals.org 69 | Page
Link n, the end-effector, frame assignment – frame {n}
Stape 6 The origin of frame {n} is chosen at the tip of the manipulator, that is, a convenient point on the last
link (the end -effecrtor). This point is called the tool point and the frame {n} is the tool frame.
Step 7 The zn-axis is fixed along the direction of zn-1-axus and pointing away from the link n. It is the
direction of approach.
Step 8 If joint n is prismatic; take xn parallel to xn-1-axis. If joint n is revolute, the choice of xn is similar to
step 4, that is, xn is perpendicular to both zn-1-and zn-axes. Xn direction is the normal direction. The yn –axis is
chosen to complete the right –handed orthonormal frame {n}. The yn – axis is the “orientation” or “sliding”
direction,[9]
IV. Result And Discussion
Fig. 3 shows the model of the proposed Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic robotics Finger
mechanism. In Fig. 3, the fingers are assumed to be index, middle, ring and little fingers.
Fig.3: Model of a MFRH
The finger has 3 active joints. DIP joint has connection with PIP joint. The thumb is designed by
having 2 active joints. The joint of each link of MFRH model is a frame to determine the kinematic derivation.
Fig. 4 shows that the finger has four frames with three joints. The first frame also known as the base
frame is x0, y0, z0 and the subsequent frames are assigned as per the figure starting with x1, y1, z1 and ending
with x4, y4, z4. The forward kinematic solution of a finger will be assigned using homogenous matrix.
Fig.4:Single Finger Model
Forward Kinematic
Forward Kinematic is used to determine the position and orientation of MFRH to determine the
position and orientation of the robot hand relative to the robot base coordinate system. The derivation of forward
kinematic equation based on Table 1
5. Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic robotics Finger mechanisms
www.iosrjournals.org 70 | Page
Hence, the forward kinematic for the fingers of robot hand are given by:
We assume that,
6. Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic robotics Finger mechanisms
www.iosrjournals.org 71 | Page
7. Kinematic Model of Anthropomorphic robotics Finger mechanisms
www.iosrjournals.org 72 | Page
Thus, this completes the kinematic modeling of anthropomorphic robot Finger mechanisms. These equations are
used in the simulation of the design of anthropomorphic robot Finger mechanisms. The results of the simulation
shall be communicated in the next publication.
V. Conclusion
The kinematic modeling plays an important role in simulation of anthropomorphic robot Finger
mechanisms. In this paper, the complete derivation of the kinematic modeling of anthropomorphic robot Finger
mechanisms was carried out to enable subsequent simulation work. The results will be published in future.
Other work such as development of control algorithm and development of anthropomorphic robot Finger
mechanisms will be addressed in the next phase of study.
References
[1]. Denavit, j.,R.S. Hartenberg.” A kinematic Notation for Lower –Pair Mechanisms Based on Matrices.” ASME Journal of Applied
Mechanics, June 1955, 215-221.
[2]. Paul Richard P., “Robot Manipulator, mathematics, Programming, and control,” MIT Press, Cambridge ,Mass., 1981.
[3]. Craig, John J., Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Contorl, 2d Edition, Addison Wesley, 1989.
[4]. Shahinpoor, Mohsen, A robot Engineering Textbook, Harper &Row, Publishers,1987.
[5]. Koren, Yoram, Robotics for Engineers, McGraw-Hill, 1985.
[6]. Fu, K.S., R.C. Gonzalez and C.S.G.Lee, Robotics: Control, Sensing, Vision, and Inteliangence, McGraw-Hill, 1987
[7]. Neil A. Davidoff, Andris Freivalds (August4, 1993). “A graphic model of the human hand using CATIA”. Department of Industrial
and Management Systems Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
[8]. Jung Won Kang, Hyun Seok Hong, Bong Sung Kim , Myung Jin Chung, “Work Assistive Mobile Robots Assisting the Disabled in a
Real Manufacturing Environment”, International Journal of Assistive Robotics and Mechtronics, Volume 8 Number 3, September
2007.
[9]. S.C. Jacobsen, E.K. Inversen, D.F. Knutti, R. T. Johnson and K.B. Biggers, “Design of the Utah/MIT Dexterous Hand, Proceedings
of the 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 1520-1532, 1986.
[10]. Matlab, 2002,MATLAB- The language of computing, version 6.5, Release 13.