This document contains a field study report on scoring rubrics. It includes an introduction stating the goal of examining different types of scoring rubrics used by resource teachers. It then provides a sample scoring rubric used to rate the field study performance. Several interview questions on the use of scoring rubrics are listed. The document concludes with sections for analysis, reflections, and includes examples of analytic and holistic rubrics developed by the student for assessing a paragraph and cooperative learning activity.
Philippine Copyright 2014
All Rights Reserved. Portions of this manuscript may be reproduced with proper referencing and due acknowledgement of the authors.
ask permission before copying the contents :)
FS6 Episode 4: The Teacher in the CommunityJamaica Olazo
Prepared by: Ms. JAMAICA OLAZO
Want to ask a copy on this, just reach me on my fb account:
https://www.facebook.com/jamFeb25
DON'T FORGET TO HIT LIKE or LEAVE A COMMENT BELOW.
Thanks :)
My Concrete Experience
My Observations
My Affirmed Concepts
My Reflections
My Future Applications
Prepared by: Ms. JAMAICA OLAZO
Want to ask a copy on this, just reach me on my fb account:
https://www.facebook.com/jamFeb25
DON'T FORGET TO HIT LIKE or LEAVE A COMMENT BELOW.
Thanks :)
My Concrete Experience
My Observations
My Affirmed Concepts
My Reflections
My Future Applications
Philippine Copyright 2014
All Rights Reserved. Portions of this manuscript may be reproduced with proper referencing and due acknowledgement of the authors.
ask permission before copying the contents :)
FS6 Episode 4: The Teacher in the CommunityJamaica Olazo
Prepared by: Ms. JAMAICA OLAZO
Want to ask a copy on this, just reach me on my fb account:
https://www.facebook.com/jamFeb25
DON'T FORGET TO HIT LIKE or LEAVE A COMMENT BELOW.
Thanks :)
My Concrete Experience
My Observations
My Affirmed Concepts
My Reflections
My Future Applications
Prepared by: Ms. JAMAICA OLAZO
Want to ask a copy on this, just reach me on my fb account:
https://www.facebook.com/jamFeb25
DON'T FORGET TO HIT LIKE or LEAVE A COMMENT BELOW.
Thanks :)
My Concrete Experience
My Observations
My Affirmed Concepts
My Reflections
My Future Applications
FS6 Episode 3: The Teacher in a School SettingJamaica Olazo
My Concrete Experience
My Observations
My Affirmed Concepts
My Reflections
My Future Applications
Prepared by: Ms. JAMAICA OLAZO
Want to ask a copy on this, just reach me on my fb account:
https://www.facebook.com/jamFeb25
DON'T FORGET TO HIT LIKE or LEAVE A COMMENT BELOW.
Thanks :)
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
Field study 5 - 4 Format
1. F i e l d S t u d y 5
ON SCORING RUBRICS
Name of FS Student
Course Year & Section
Resource Teacher 1 ___________________________ Signature _____________ Date_______
Resource Teacher 2 ___________________________ Signature _____________ Date_______
Resource Teacher 3 ___________________________ Signature _____________ Date_______
Cooperating School
My Target
In this episode, I must be able to examine different types of scoring rubrics used by my
resource Teachers and relate them to assessment of student learning.
My Performance (How Will I Be Rated)
Field Study 3 – Technology in the Learning Environment
Tasks
Exemplary
4
Superior
3
Satisfactory
2
Unsatisfactory
1
Observation/
Documentation:
All tasks were
done with
outstanding
quality; work
exceeds
expectation
All or nearly all
Tasks were done
with high quality
Nearly all tasks
were done with
acceptable
quality
Fewer than half of
tasks were done; or
most objectives met
but with poor
quality
4 3 2 1
My Analysis Analysis
Question were
answered
completely; in
depth answers;
thoroughly
grounded on
theories
exemplary
grammar and
Analysis
questions were
answered
completely
Clear connection
with theories
Grammar and
spelling are
Analysis
Questions were
Not answered
completely.
Vaguely related
To the theories
Grammar and
spelling
`Analysis questions
were not answered.
Grammar and
spelling
unsatisfactory.
Episode 4
2. F i e l d S t u d y 5
Transmutation of score to grade/rating
Score Grade Score Grade
20 - 1.0 - 99 12-13 - 2.50 - 81
18-19 - 1.25 - 96 11 - 2.75 - 78
17 - 1.5 - 93 10 - 3.00 - 75
16 - 1.75 - 90 8-9 - 3.5 - 72 and
15 - 2.00 - 87 7-below - 5.00 - below
14 - 2.25 - 84
spelling superior. acceptable.
4 3 2 1
My Reflection Reflection
statements are
profound and
clear, supported
by experiences
from the
episode.
Reflection
statements are
clear, but not
clearly supported
by experiences
from the
episode.
Reflection
statements are
shallow;
supported by the
experiences from
the episode
Reflection
statements are
unclear shallow and
are not supported
by experiences
from the episode.
4 3 2 1
My Portfolio Portfolio is
complete, clear,
well organized
and all
supporting
documentation
are located in
sections clearly
designated.
Portfolio is
complete, clear,
well organized
and most
supporting
documentation
are available
and/or in logical
and clearly
marked
locations.
Portfolio is
incomplete
supporting
documentation is
organized but is
lacking.
Portfolio has many
lacking
component’s;
unorganized and
unclear’
4 3 2 1
Submission
Before deadline On the deadline A day after the
deadline
Two days or more
after the deadline
4 3 2 1
Over-all Score
Rating:
(Based on
Transmutation)
_______________________________ _____________________
Signature of FS Teacher Date
above Printed Name
3. F i e l d S t u d y 5
My Map
My Tools
Interview of my Resource Teachers
I will ask the following questions:
1. Where do you use the scoring rubrics? (Student outputs or products and student activities)
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
1. Review “Scoring Rubrics in Assessment of Learning 2, 2007, by
Santos, R. pp.37-44.
6. I will reflect on all information gathered.
5. I will analyze information from my interview and research.
4. If there are no scoring rubrics available, I will research on samples
of scoring rubrics for student papers, cooperative learning activities,
group projects, performances and the like.
3. Request my Resource teachers for a copy (for to photocopy) of the
scoring rubrics that the school uses for group projects, student
papers, cooperative learning activities.
2. Interview at least 2 Resource Teachers on their use of scoring
rubrics in assessing learning.
4. F i e l d S t u d y 5
2. What help have scoring rubrics given you? When there were no scoring rubrics yet, what did
you use?
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
3. What difficulties have you met in the use of scoring rubrics?
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
4. Do you make use of holistic and analytic rubrics? How do they differ?
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
5. Which is easier to use- analytic or holistic?
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
6. Were you involved in the making of the scoring rubrics? How do you make one? Which is
easier to construct- analytic or holistic?
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
5. F i e l d S t u d y 5
Research
I will research on the following:
Types of rubrics
When to use rubrics
How to construct the two types of rubrics
Advantages and disadvantages of scoring rubrics
6. F i e l d S t u d y 5
My Analysis
1. What benefits have scoring rubrics brought to the teaching-learning process?
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
2. How are scoring rubrics related to portfolio assessment?
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
3. To get the most from scoring rubrics, what should be observed in the making and use of
scoring rubrics?
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
My Reflections
Reflect on this: Scoring Rubrics: Boon or Bane?
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
7. F i e l d S t u d y 5
My Portfolio
Come up with one scoring rubric for a student product (e. g. paragraph or theme written) and
another for a student such as a cooperative learning activity.
Scoring Rubric for Paragraph Writing
8. F i e l d S t u d y 5
Scoring Rubric for Cooperative Learning Activity