Teachers should ensure tests have content validity by aligning test items to learning outcomes. A Table of Specifications (TOS) helps achieve this by specifying how learning outcomes will be assessed. The document discusses using a TOS to formulate test items that accurately measure intended learning outcomes based on time spent on each outcome. It provides examples of TOS and analyzes whether test items match what a TOS specifies.
This module will help you to —
• understand the genesis and importance of School Based Assessment,
• familiarize with learner-centred approaches for assessment,
• facilitate integration of teaching learning process with assessment procedures,
• develop context-based exemplars in the relevant subject areas for the purpose of assessment.
Competency assessment boot camp basics with tpcvitek
This is a presentation used to teach the basics of competency development and assessment. It demonstrates the use of the audience response system, Turning Point.
Teacher Leaders: Leading Change in Difficult Times
What will schools look like 20 years from now? What role should teacher leaders play in this process? Come hear a national presenter discuss lessons learned from the nations’ most rapidly improving schools. This presentation looks at moving to CCSS using high levels of rigor for student learning and preparing classrooms for high student engagement.
Presenter: Bobby Ashley - Jefferson, NC
Educational Psychology Developing Learners 8th Edition Ormrod Test Bankkynep
Full download http://alibabadownload.com/product/educational-psychology-developing-learners-8th-edition-ormrod-test-bank/
Educational Psychology Developing Learners 8th Edition Ormrod Test Bank
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
FS 5 - Episode 5
1. 5
My Learning Episode Overview
One mortal sin that teachers commit is giving tests that lack content validity.
This means that a number of teachers give tests which are not aligned to their learning
outcomes or objectives. This is contrary to outcomes-based education. The use of a
Table of Specifications (TOS) can help address the problem of tests lacking in content
validity.
My Intended Learning Outcomes
At the end of this Episode, you must be able to:
Construct a Table of Specifications
Apply OBE by formulating test items with content validity
My Performance Criteria
I will be rated along the following:
a. quality of my observations and documentations,
b. completeness and depth of my analysis,
c. depth and clarity of my classroom observation-based reflections,
d. completeness, organizations, clarity of my portfolio and
e. time of submission of my portfolio.
FS 5FIELD STUDY
LearningEpisode
TABLE OF SPECIFICATIONS (TOS)
CONTENT VALIDITY and OUTCOMES-
BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
2. My Learning Essentials
A Table of Specifications [TOS] is a table that specifies the learning outcomes/ lesson
objectives, the amount of time spent for each outcomes/ objective which will serve as
basis in determining the corresponding number of items.
TOS helps teachers align objectives, instruction, and assessment. It is sometimes
called a test blueprint. This strategy can be used for a variety of assessment method but
is most commonly associated with constructing traditional summative tests.
Aligning assessment tools and tasks to learning outcomes is a must in Outcomes-
Based Teaching- Learning.
A test or any assessment tool or task that matter possesses content validity only
when that assessment tool or task measures or assesses what it is supposed to
measure or assess. You are supposed to assess students’ ability to draw conclusions
based on given facts but your assessment tool and task make the students define a
conclusion. It is one thing to draw conclusion. It is another thing to define it.
The assessment task is not aligned to the learning outcome; therefore, it does not
possess content validity. The assessment task that has content validity is to ask the
students to draw conclusion from the facts that teacher gives.
Defining a conclusion is in the level of comprehension, perhaps even recall if definition
is simply memorized, while drawing
3. My Map
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Research My Learning Essentials.
Ask my Resource Teacher for a copy of her
TOS.
Surf the internet for more samples.
Study these samples of TOS.
Answer the LET-like test items.
Come up with my portfolio.
4. My LearningActivities
1. Study Sample TOS
I will study the sample of TOS below.
2nd
SemesterSY20__-20___
EDUC11 Table of Specification FINAL
Course CatalogNumber Assessmentof StudentLearning2 Periodical Examination
Course Title
TOTALRemembering Understanding Thinking
Declarative (Comprehending/
Applying )
( Analyzing/
Evaluating/
Creating ) # %
# % Item # # % Item # Item #
Authentic
Assessment:Basic
Concept 20 33.3% 1-4,7-
15,20-26
20
33%
Authentic
Assessment:
Advance
Application
10 17% 5,6,16-
19,27-30
10 17%
Discussof
Behavioral
Objective /
IntendedLearning
Outcomes
10 17% 31
10 17%
Portfolioon
Authentic
20 33% 32-35
20 33%
Assessment
TOTAL 20 33% 10 17% 30 50% 60 100.0%
Prepared by:
_____________________
Instructor
5. 2. Comparison of given TOS that I research on.
I will compare the given TOS with other TOS that I research on
My Analysis
1. For a TOS to ensure test content validity, what parts must it have?
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
2. Among the TOSs that you researched on, which is a better TOS? Why?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
6. 3. Can a teacher have a test with content validity even without making TOS?
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
4. Explain why the use of TOS enhances that content validity?
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
_
7. My Reflections
Read this conversation and reflect on teachers’ assessment practices. Write your
reflections here.
Did you have a similar experience? Reflect on it?
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
But we talked about Puerto Princesa
for – like 2 second last week. Why would she put that on the exam?”
“You know how teachers are… they’re always trying to trick you.”
“Yes, they find the most nit-picky little details to put on their
test and don’t even care if the information is important.”
“It’s just not fair. I studied everything we discussed in class about the
Philippines things she made a big deal about, like comparing the
Philippines And to think all she asked was ‘What’s the capital of
Singapore? Really? Grrr”
[Adapted from Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, Vol.18
No.3, February 2013]
8. Integrating Theoryand Practice
1. Here is a lesson objective/ intended learning outcome: “illustrate the law of
supply and demand with your original concrete example”. For content validity,
which test items is aligned?
A. Define the law of supply and demand and illustrate it with an example.
B. Illustrate the law of supply and demand with drawing.
C. Illustrate the law of supply and demand with concrete, original example.
D. Explain the law of supply and demand and illustrate it with a diagram.
2. Teacher Joji wrote this learning outcome; “To interpret a given quotation.” For
content validity which should she ask?
A. Interpret Nietsche’s statement: “He who has a why to live for can bear with
almost any how.”
B. Did you believe in Nietsche’s statement “He who has a why to live for can
bear with almost any how”?
C. What is true in Nietsche’s statement “He who has a why to live for can bear
with almost any how”?
D. Nietsche was an atheist. Do you believe that he can give this statement” He
who has a why to live for can bear with almost any how?
3. After teaching them the process of experimenting, Teacher Joe wanted his
students to be able set up an experiment to find an answer to a scientific
problem. Which will he ask his students to do?
A. Set up and experiment to find out if aerial plants can also live on land.
B. Can aerial plants also live on land? Research on experiment already
conducted. Present your finding in class.
C. Observe if aerial plants can survive when planted in soil. Note your
observations and present them in class.
9. D. Research on the answers to this scientific problem: Can aerial plans survive
when transferred in soil?
4. Here is an intended learning outcome of a Health teacher: “Identify skill-related
fitness and activities suitable for the individual”. Does her test item measure this
particular outcome and therefore has content validity?
Question
1. Identify the components of Physical Fitness under the skill-related activities.
A. Body composition C. Flexibility
B. Agility D. organic vigor
A. Yes, very much
B. Yes because it asks something about skill-related activities
C. No
D. No, the opinion have nothing to do with skill-related activities
5. In Teacher Lea’s Table of Specifications TOS, 60 percent of the 1st grading test
items are applying questions based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. A review of her test
shows that 50% are remembering items, 20% are analyzing questions and 30%
are applying questions. Does Teacher’s test coincide with her TOS?
A. No
B. No, her analyzing questions is supposed to be 60%
C. Yes
D. Yes, her applying question are also analyzing question, too.
10. My Learning Portfolio
Give an example of TOS that reflects levels of learning either by Bloom or Kendall and
Marzano.
Which TOS is better? Why?
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
11. ______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
My LearningRubric
FieldStudy5,Episode 5 – Table of Specification(TOS)ContentValidityand
Outcomes-BasedEducation(OBE)
Focusedon:
Constructinga Table of Specifications
ApplyingOBEbyformulatingtestitemswithcontentvalidity
Name of FS Student: ___________________________ Date Submitted: _______________
Year & Section: _______________________________ Course: ______________________
Learning Episodes
Exemplary
4
Superior
3
Satisfactory
2
Needs
Improvement
1
Learning activities
All episodeswere
done with
outstanding
quality;work
exceeds
expectations
4
All or nearlyall
episodeswere
done withhigh
quality.
3
Nearlyall episodes
were done with
acceptable
quality.
2
Fewerthanhalf of
episodesweredoe;
or most objectives
were metbutneed
improvement.
1
Analysis of the
Learning Episode
All questionsor
episodeswere
answered
completely;in
depthanswers;
thoroughly
groundedon
theories.Exemplary
grammar and
spelling.
4
Analysisquestions
were answered
completely.
Clearconnection
withtheories.
Grammar and
spellingare
superior.
3
Analysisquestions
were not
answered
completely.
Vaguelyrelatedto
the theories.
Grammar and
spelling
acceptable.
2
Analysisquestions
were notanswered.
Grammar and
spelling
unsatisfactory.
1
12. Reflections/Insights
Reflection
statementsare
profoundandclear,
supportedby
experiencesform
the learning
episodes.
4
Reflection
statementsare
clear,but not
clearlysupported
by experiences
fromthe learning
episodes.
3
Reflection
statementsare
shallow;
supportedby
experiencesfrom
the learning
episodes.
2
Reflection
statementsare
unclearand shallow
and are not
supportedby
experiencesfrom
the learning
episodes.
1
Learning Portfolio
Portfoliois
complete,clear,
well-organized;all
supporting
documentations
are locatedin
sectionsclearly
designated.
4
Portfoliois
complete,clear,
well-organized;
mostsupporting
documentations
are available and
logical andclearly
markedlocations.
3
Portfoliois
incomplete;
supporting
documentations
are organizedbut
are lacking.
2
Analysisquestions
were notanswered.
Grammar and
spelling
unsatisfactory.
1
Submission of
Learning Episodes
Submittedbefore
the deadline.
4
Submittedonthe
deadline.
3
Submittedaday
afterthe deadline
2
Submittedtwodays
or more after the
deadline.
1
COMMENTS Over-all score Rating:
(Based on
transmutation)
TRANSMUTATION OF SCORE TO GRADE/RATING
Score 20 19-18 17 16 15 14 13-12 11 10 9-8 7- below
Grade 1.0 1.25 1.5 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.5 5.00
99 96 93 90 87 84 81 78 75 72 71-below
Signature of FS Teacher Date