by E.K. Panyan, N. Karbo, F.K. Avornyo, A., Ayantunde, F. Kizito, K. Tengan
Presented at the Final Volta Basin Development Challenge Science Workshop, September 2013
Similar to Farm level best fit rainwater management strategies and soil improvement methods for seed and biomass yield in a maize soy bean intercrop (20)
Farm level best fit rainwater management strategies and soil improvement methods for seed and biomass yield in a maize soy bean intercrop
1. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
Farm level best fit rainwater management
strategies and soil improvement methods for
seed and biomass yield in a maize-soy bean
intercrop.
1
Panyan, E.K., 1
Karbo N., 1
Avornyo, F.K., 2
Ayantunde, A.,Kizito3
, F
and 1
Tengan, K.
1
Animal Research Institute, P.O. Box 52, Nyankpala near Tamale, Ghana
2
International Livestock Research Institute, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
3
International Water Management Institute, Accra, Ghana
2. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
PRESENTATION OUTLINE:
ο Key message
ο Objective of the study
ο Methodology
ο Results
ο Lessons
ο Conclusions
3. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
KEY MESSAGE:
ο Integrated rainwater management strategies can
close yield gabs on smallholder farms
ο In the event of scaling up, the internal and external
inputs become crucial and should be addressed
ο The PAR as a tool has the potential to build the
adaptive capacity of smallholder farmers
4. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
OBJECTIVE OF STUDY:
The main V2 project objective is to identify,
evaluate, adapt and disseminate best-fit integrated
rainwater management strategies targeted to
different biophysical and socio-economic domains
in the Volta basin in northern Ghana.
5. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
METHODOLOGY
Participatory Action Research:
ο Innovation Platforms to validate value chain commodities
and the problems identified from PRAs
ο IPs and researchers designed PAR protocol in workshop
ο Training of farmer experimenters and extension agents on
protocol
ο Farmer field cross visits
6. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
METHODOLOGY CONTD.
On-farm experimentation:
Study location and farmer engagement;
ο Two districts ( Lawra and Tolon)
ο Two communities per district (4 communities)
ο 32 Farmer experimenters (16 men 16 women) for all
locations
ο 5 Treatments per farmer with 3 replicates on 10m
x10m sub-plot
On-station experimentation
ο Experiment repeated with 2 additional treatments
(7 treatments).
7. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
Explanation of treatments applied on farmersβ
fields
Treatment Soil water management Soil fertility management
Tied ridges Contour bunds Organic
manure
Inorganic
fertilizer
1
2 β β
3 β β
4 β β β
5 β β β
All farmers sowed maize/soy bean intercrop
8. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
METHODOLOGY CONTD.
Measurements:
Dependent variables monitored;
ο Net grain yield(maize & soybean)
ο Crop residue yield (bulk dry matter)
Cost benefit analysis of interventions
Statistical analysis:
ο SAS was used to analyze the data and Student
Newman-Keuls used to separate the means with
p<0.05 being significant.
9. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
Results
Maize and soy seed and biomass, Treatments
Lawra and Tolon
10. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
RESULTS CONTD.
Maize and soy seed and biomass, communities
Lawra and Tolon
11. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
RESULTS CONTD.
MAIZE & SOY SEED AND BIOMASS LAWRA AND TOLON
12. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
RESULTS CONTD.
Maize and soy seed and biomass, gender
Lawra and Tolon
13. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
Treatments and average net profits
Treatments Average net profit
($) across sites
(N=28)
Average net profit
($) for Lawra site
(N=12)
Average net profit
($) for Tolon site
(N=16)
T1 -8.00 -64.00 32.00
T2 61.00 -19.00 123.00
T3 16.00 -59.00 73.00
T4 56.00 84.00 34.00
T5 116.00 62.00 156.00
N=Number of farmers used in computation
14. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
LESSONS LEARNED:
ο Farmer experimenters appeared more willing to put
interventions on poorer lands.
ο IPs are important in PAR for problem identification
and information sharing.
ο Farmers are motivated by increased yield to have a
voice in selection of treatments.
ο For the resource poor, good agronomic cultural
practices could be a means to achieving good yield.
15. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
CONCLUSIONS
ο Integrated rainwater management strategies at
farm level have potential to close yield gabs with
food security outcomes.
ο Colossal plant biomass generated has potential to
address livestock dry season feed needs and
sustain crop-livestock systems.
ο Where economic decisions are paramount
Rainwater management strategies may require site-
specific recommendations.
16. Andes β’ Ganges β’ Limpopo β’ Mekong β’ Nile β’ Volta
THANK YOU!