- Students from five classes participated in an Erasmus+ project from 2015-2017 focused on flipped learning and ICT. They completed various tasks to improve their digital skills, intercultural awareness, and language skills. - An evaluation of student work found that while language and study skills improved for most students, some did not properly cite sources or consistently acknowledge the project. Student motivation remained high overall. - Key outcomes included strengthened language ability, social skills, and use of ICT. However, some students failed to include logos or reference the project name in their work products.

1. 2015 – 2017
Erasmus+ KA2 Project
MULTIDISCIPLINARY FLIPPED LEARNING WITH ICT
FLwICT

2.  Five classes worked on the project (two second year classes, three third year classes)
 Out of these classes twenty students were chosen to make up the National group
 All of the students of each class got involved in the following tasks
First Year- First Semester
Improving Digital Skills
First Year- First Semester
Improving Intercultural Awareness
October 2015
Creating the project logo
February 2016
Preparing a presentation about the culture
December 2015
Preparation a digital postcard- Making an e-
guide about how to make a movie- Preparing a
video about the students’ own school
March 2016
Preparing an e-guide about the culture
January 2016
Preparing a presentation about Cyberbullying
April 2016
Preparing a presentation about the custom and
etiquette
May 2016
General evaluation of the students’ products
 Five students-in-charge uploaded the whole works on the e-twinning platform
 The coordinator teacher of the project provided with the upload of the students’ works
on face group because the Italian law forbids the registration of a minor on a social
network.

3. 46 students worked on the preparation of the project logo. They mainly used computer program
for designing it and they succeeded in making interesting works. Students’ motivation and
engagement were high. They enjoyed co-creating and sharing ideas. Few students got average
performance degree in different items
38 students worked on the preparation of a digital postcard, making an e-guide about how to
make a movie and preparing a video about the students’ own school. Results show important
improvement in language and study skills but few students used the logos of Erasmus+, NA and
the name of the project while building up their works and took care about mentioning the sources.
Moreover students’ motivation reached high level while co-operation was not so successful.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
He/she used
the computer
program for
designing the
logo properly
He/she
designed really
creative logo
He/she did the
work selflessly He/she
cooperated
with other
students
His/her
motivation is
high
He/she studied
consistently and
productively
He/she
completed the
work on time
He/she
published the
work on the e-
twinning
without any
problems
He/she
published the
work on face
group
3 8
3
3 4
4
3
22
27
20
16 16
15
16
21
11
23
27 26
27
27
5
Graphic 1 - October 2015: Creating the project logo
POOR AVERAGE ABOVE AVERAGE SUPERIOR
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
He/she used
the logos of
Erasmus + and
NA correctly
He/she used
the name of
the project
He/she
defined the
sources
He/she
improved
language skills
His/she took
care to use
proper English
language
He/she
researched
enough
He/she
cooperated
with other
students
His/her
motivation is
high
He/she
studied
consistently
and
pproductively
He/she
completed the
work on time
He/she
published the
work on the e-
twinning
without any
problems
He/she
published the
work on face
group
2
1
1
2
4
4 5
23
23 21
17 18
23
17 16
1
1
14 14
12
4
19
14
21
1
Graphic 2 - December 2015: Preparation a digital postcard - Making an e-guide about how to make a movie -
Preparing a video about the students'own school
AVERAGE ABOVE AVERAGE SUPERIOR

4. The 6 students achieved the most positive performance degree in almost all items except the one
concerning the use of the name of the project while building up their works. The third column in
the graphic, instead, shows the lack of documenting sources: mentioning the sources was
important to show they did a proper research, that their sources were reliable and to allow reader
to track them down.
Of the 4 students involved in this activity only one mastered all the items accurately, the other
three were able to carry out their performances very well but they didn’t care about citing the
sources.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
He/she used
the logos of
Erasmus + and
NA correctly
He/she used
the name of
the project
He/she
defined the
sources
He/she
improved
language skills
His/she took
care to use
proper English
language
He/she
researched
enough
He/she
cooperated
with other
students
His/her
motivation is
high
He/she
studied
consistently
and
pproductively
He/she
completed the
work on time
He/she
published the
work on the e-
twinning
without any
problems
He/she
published the
work on face
group
6
3
6 6 6 6
6
6
6
Graphic 3 - January 2016: Preparing a presentation about Cyberbullyng (only for students who attended the meeting in Italy)
AVERAGE ABOVE AVERAGE SUPERIOR
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
He/she used
the logos of
Erasmus + and
NA correctly
He/she used
the name of
the project
He/she
defined the
sources
He/she
improved
language skills
His/she took
care to use
proper English
language
He/she
researched
enough
He/she
cooperated
with other
students
His/her
motivation is
high
He/she
studied
consistently
and
pproductively
He/she
completed the
work on time
He/she
published the
work on the e-
twinning
without any
problems
He/she
published the
work on face
group
3
4
1
4 4 4 4
4
4
4
Graphic 4 - February 2016: Preparing a presentation about the culture (only for students who attended the meeting in Spain
AVERAGE ABOVE AVERAGE SUPERIOR

5. 18 students worked on this item. The results show that 5 students achieved a high performance
degree as they mastered all the items very well. Anyway the rest of the students improved their
language and study skills, completed the work on time but they paid little attention to use the
name of the project and to cite the sources.
Of the 4 students involved in this activity two mastered all the items accurately, the other two
were able to carry out their performances very well but they didn’t care about citing the sources.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
He/she used
the logos of
Erasmus + and
NA correctly
He/she used
the name of
the project
He/she
defined the
sources
He/she
improved
language skills
His/she took
care to use
proper English
language
He/she
researched
enough
He/she
cooperated
with other
students
His/her
motivation is
high
He/she
studied
consistently
and
pproductively
He/she
completed the
work on time
He/she
published the
work on the e-
twinning
without any
problems
He/she
published the
work on face
group
2
2
2
15
5
3
16
18
16
17 18
18
18
Graphic 5 - March 2016: Preparing an e-guide about the culture
AVERAGE ABOVE AVERAGE SUPERIOR
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
He/she used
the logos of
Erasmus + and
NA correctly
He/she used
the name of
the project
He/she
defined the
sources
He/she
improved
language skills
His/she took
care to use
proper English
language
He/she
researched
enough
He/she
cooperated
with other
students
His/her
motivation is
high
He/she
studied
consistently
and
pproductively
He/she
completed the
work on time
He/she
published the
work on the e-
twinning
without any
problems
He/she
published the
work on face
group
3 3
2
4 4 4 4
4
4
4
Graphic 6 - April 2016: Preparing a presentation about the custom and etiquette (only for students who attended the meeting in Latvia)
AVERAGE ABOVE AVERAGE SUPERIOR

6. The results of this students’ performance assessment allow us to summarize the following key
points:
 Improvement in language and study skills: students improved their English by using it in
building up their works and communicating; students improved their method of learning
(researching, analyzing, synthesizing, using maps,…)
 Improvement in social skills: communicating, interacting, co-operating, sharing
 Using ICT while making their activities
 Very high students’ motivation
 Few students used the logos of Erasmus+ and NA on their works
 Few students used the name of the project on their works
 General lack of attention to define the sources on their works