2. CONTENTS
Working Subjects of FLwICT Project’s First Year
Aim of Performance assessment of Students
Information About Graphics
Graphics of the Students Performance
September 2015 - Preparation of the project board
October 2015 - Creating the project logo
December 2015 - Preparation a digital postcard – Making an e-guide about how to
make a movie – Preparing a video about the students’ own school
January 2016 - Preparing a presentation about Cyberbullying
February 2016 - Preparing a presentation about the culture
March 2016 - Preparing an e-guide about the culture
April 2016 - Preparing a presentation about the custom and etiquette
Conclusions
3. WORKING SUBJECTS
• In 2015-2016 academic year, during the implementation process of Multidisciplinary
Flipped Learning with ICT Project’s first year, the students of Girne Secondary School
have studied about the subjects which are given below.
First Year - First Semester
Improving Digital Skills
First Year - Second Semester
Improving Intercultural Awareness
September 2015
Preparation of the project board
February 2016
Preparing a presentation about the culture
October 2015
Creating the project logo
March 2016
Preparing an e-guide about the culture
December 2015
Preparation a digital postcard – Making an e-guide
about how to make a movie – Preparing a video
about the students’s own school
Aprial 2016
Preparing a presentation about the custom
and etiquette
January 2016
Preparing a presentation about Cyberbullying
May 2016
General evaluation of student’s products
4. AIM OF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF
STUDENTS
• The goal of this performance assessment is to decide the level It can help
the teachers about which subjects to be given more special attention
while the students are working on the products.
• This assessment strategy can be used to monitor students’ English
language skills, as well as their competence in particular areas. of
competence of the students.
5. AIM OF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF
STUDENTS
• This performance assessment also provides useful information to assess
whether the students improved their language skills or not throughout the
first year of the project.
• It can help the teachers about which subjects to be given more special
attention while the students are working on the products.
6. INFORMATION ABOUT GRAPHICS
• At the end of May, the evaluation form, which was prepared in
order to assess the students’ all products was filled for each student
monthly.
• This year, 20 students of Miguel de Cervantes Secondary School
have participated in FLwICT project.
• The evaluations of our students’ performances are given in details
as graphics.
• The scale level for each item represents;
• 1 (Poor), 2 (Average), 3 (Above average) and 4 (Superior).
7. SEPTEMBER 2015
Preparation of the project board
0
5
10
15
20
He/she cooperated
with other students
His/her motivation is
high
He/she studied
consistently and
productively
He/she completed
the work on time
He/she did the work
selflessly
1
11
10 10
9
13
9
10 10 10
7
Superior
Above Average
Average
Poor
8. OCTOBER 2015
0
5
10
15
20
He/she used the
computer program for
designing the logo
properly
He/she designed
really creative logo
He/she did the work
selflessly
He/she cooperated
with other students
His/her motivation is
high
11
2 2
9
1
3
8
6
4
6
16
10
11
7
12
Superior
Above Average
Average
Poor
October 2015: Creating the project logo
9. OCTOBER 2015
0
5
10
15
20
He/she studied
consistently and
productively
He/she completed the
work on time
He/she published the work
on the e-twinning without
any problems
He/she published the work
on face group
7
3
1
4
4
11
5
4
5
8
15
5
8
Superior
Above
Average
Average
Poor
October 2015: Creating the project logo
10. DECEMBER 2015
0
5
10
15
20
He/she used the
logos of Erasmus+
and NA correctly
He/she used the
name of the project
He/she defined the
sources
He/she improved
language skills
He/she took care to
use proper English
language
He/she researched
enough
10
3
7
5
4
5
4
2 2
3
8
8
11
14
2
4
7
8
7
4
Superior
Above
Average
Average
Poor
December 2015: Preparation a digital postcard – Making an e-guide about
how to make a movie – Preparing a video about the students’ own school
11. DECEMBER 2015
December 2015: Preparation a digital postcard – Making an e-guide about
how to make a movie – Preparing a video about the students’ own school
0
5
10
15
20
He/she cooperated
with other students
His/her motivation
is high
He/she studied
consistently and
productively
He/she completed
the work on time
He/she published
the work on the e-
twinning without
any problems
He/she published
the work on face
group
8
22 2
4
8
2
10
12
10
10
2
6
8
6 6
10
2
10
Superior
Above
Average
Average
Poor
12. JANUARY 2016
January 2016: Preparing a presentation about Cyberbullying
0
1
2
3
4
He/she used the
logos of Erasmus+
and NA correctly
He/she used the
name of the project
He/she defined the
sources
He/she improved
language skills
He/she took care to
use proper English
language
He/she researched
enough
1
3
1
2
3
3
4
2
4
3
1
Superior
Above Average
Average
Poor
(only for students involved in the meeting in Italy)
13. JANUARY 2016
January 2016: Preparing a presentation about Cyberbullying
(only for students involved in the meeting in Italy)
0
1
2
3
4
He/she cooperated
with other students
His/her motivation is
high
He/she studied
consistently and
productively
He/she completed
the work on time
He/she published
the work on the e-
twinning without any
problems
He/she published
the work on face
group
3
4
1
1 1 1
4
3 3 3
Superior
Above
Average
Average
Poor
14. FEBRUARY 2016
February 2016: Preparing a presentation about the culture
(only for students involved in the meeting in Spain)
0
1
2
3
4
He/she used the
logos of Erasmus+
and NA correctly
He/she used the
name of the project
He/she defined the
sources
He/she improved
language skills
He/she took care to
use proper English
language
He/she researched
enough
3
1 1
3
4
1
4 4
3
Superior
Above
Average
Average
Poor
15. FEBRUARY 2016
February 2016: Preparing a presentation about the culture
(only for students involved in the meeting in Spain)
0
1
2
3
4
He/she cooperated
with other students
His/her motivation is
high
He/she studied
consistently and
productively
He/she completed
the work on time
He/she published
the work on the e-
twinning without any
problems
He/she published
the work on face
group
2
11
3
4 4 4
2
3
Superior
Above
Average
Average
Poor
16. MARCH 2016
March 2016: Preparing an e-guide about the culture
0
5
10
15
20
He/she used the
logos of Erasmus+
and NA correctly
He/she used the
name of the project
He/she defined the
sources
He/she improved
language skills
He/she took care to
use proper English
language
He/she researched
enough
1
7
1
13
2
1 1
4
19
17
19 19
16 Superior
Above
Average
Average
Poor
17. MARCH 2016
March 2016: Preparing an e-guide about the culture
0
5
10
15
20
He/she cooperated
with other students
His/her motivation is
high
He/she studied
consistently and
productively
He/she completed
the work on time
He/she published
the work on the e-
twinning without any
problems
He/she published
the work on face
group
1
20 20
1
1
1
9
6
1
19
10
11
19
Superior
Above Average
Average
Poor
18. APRIL 2016
April 2016: Preparing a presentation about the custom and etiquette
(only for students involved in the meeting in Latvia)
0
1
2
3
4
He/she used the
logos of Erasmus+
and NA correctly
He/she used the
name of the project
He/she defined the
sources
He/she improved
language skills
He/she took care to
use proper English
language
He/she researched
enough
2
2
2
4 4 4 4
2
Superior
Above
Average
Average
Poor
19. APRIL 2016
April 2016: Preparing a presentation about the custom and etiquette
(only for students involved in the meeting in Latvia)
0
1
2
3
4
He/she
cooperated with
other students
His/her motivation
is high
He/she studied
consistently and
productively
He/she completed
the work on time
He/she published
the work on the e-
twinning without
any problems
He/she published
the work on face
group
2
2
1 1
4
3 3
4
0
4
Superior
Above
Average
Average
Poor
20. CONCLUSIONS
1. The students have improved their English language skills
throughout the implementation processes of the project’s first year.
2. Mostly all students tried to use proper English while preparing
the works.
3. Mostly all students cooperated with each other while working on
the their responsibilities.
4. As shown in Graphics, most of the students’ motivation was
really high.
5. Mostly all students tried to use computer programs properly
especially while preparing presentations, logos and videos.
21. CONCLUSIONS
6. Mostly all students assumed the responsibilities on the area at
issue selflessly.
7. Mostly all students studied consistently and productively
during the first year of the project.
8. Many students tried to use the logos of Erasmus+ and NA on
their products correctly.
9. Many of the students used the name of the project on their
products.
.
22. CONCLUSIONS
10. Few students published their works on Face group successfully.
11. Most of the students didn’t pay enough attention to define the
sources on their products.
12. Mostly all students used the time efficiently. Most of the students
completed their products on time.
13. Most of the students couldn’t publish their products on e-
twinning platform without any problems
.
23. CONCLUSIONS
Summing up, we consider , in general, the implementation of the
project in our school has been very successful and profitable,
achieving the main goals defined.
Nevertheless, it can be said that the students must be more active
about publishing the products on Face group and e-Twinning
platform. And they have to paid more attention to define the
sources of their products.
24. PREPARED BY
JOSÉ LUIS LEÓN GONZÁLEZ
TECHNOLOGY TEACHER
MIGUEL DE CERVANTES SECONDARY SCHOOL
Seville/ SPAIN
