SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Dr. Parag Moon
Senior resident,
Dept. of Neurology
GMC, Kota
 CNS tumors can primarily be divided into
 Primary -originates in the brain (solitary, nodular)
 Secondary-made up of cells that have spread (metastasized)
to the brain from somewhere else in the body.
 Multiple in number, prior h/o cancer , edema +, located at
gray white interface.
 May lodge into
- Brain parenchyma – most common area of metastases
- Leptomeninges – pia mater & arachnoid mater
- Dural space
 Tumors of Neuroepithelial Tissue
 Tumors of Cranial and Spinal Nerves
 Tumors of Meninges
 Lymphomas and Hematopoietic
Neoplasm
 Germ Cell Tumor
 Tumors of Sellar Regions (pituitary
/craniopharyngioma)
 Metastatic Tumors
 Many grading systems (e.g., Kernohan, St.
Anne-Mayo, and Ringertz systems)
 Most of these grading systems share an
assessment of nuclear abnormalities,
mitoses, endothelial proliferation, and
necrosis
 WHO grade I – low proliferative potential.
Possible cure with surgery alone
 WHO grade II – infiltrating, but low in mitotic
activity. Can recur and progress to other
grades
 WHO grade III – Histologic evidence of
malignancy (mitotic activity), infiltrative,
anaplastic
 WHO grade IV – mitotically active, necrosis,
rapid pre and post-surgical progression
Cell of origin can be
1. Astrocytes
2. Oligodendrocytes
3. Ependymal cells
4. Mixed
 Identified by glial fibrillary acidic protein
(GFAP) and S100
 Gliomas-Most common (80%) primary
malignant brain tumours.
 Gliobastoma accounts for 54%.
 Most common is astrocytoma (including
gliobastoma)-76%.
 Slight male preponderance.
 More common in whites.
 Exposure to ionizing radiations is the only
definite risk factor
 They are common in;
 NF type I (15 – 20% develop LGGs)
 NF type II
 Tuberous sclerosis
 Li-Fraumeni syndrome
 Environmental exposure to Nitrites/Nitrates
(nitrosamines/amides)
 Radiofrequency radiation.
 Electromagnetic field radiation(EMF)
 Allergies/IgE levels association
 Vit. E and C consumption.
 Head trauma
 Tobacco, alcohol consumption
 p53 gene mutation (a consistent finding)
 1p/19q mutations in tumours transforming
to high grade
Genetics
 Well circumscribed both grossly and
radiologically.
 More common in cerebellum, third ventricle,
hypothalamus, optic nerve, spinal cord,
dorsal brainstem.
 Cerebellar-large fluid filled cyst with
enhancing nodule.
 Hyothalamus, optic nerve- solid tumours.
 Outcome excellent (80% 20-year survival)
 Biphasic pattern- compact pilocytic areas
with interspersed microcytic, loose and
spongy areas.
 Rosenthal fibres
 Mulberry shaped eosinophilic granular
inclusion
 Pilomyxoid astrocytoma-variant, more
aggressive, affects children younger than 3
years
Fig 2.4B: Axial T1 Wtd. MRIFig 2.4A: Axial T2 Wtd. MRI Fig 2.4C: Post-Contrast Axial T1 Wtd. MRI
A large cystic tumor (yellow arrow) with a mural enhancing nodule (red arrow) is seen within the left cerebellar
hemisphere.
DIAGNOSIS: PILOCYTIC ASTROCYTOMA
• Grade I Astrocytoma (WHO Classification)
• Children and young adults
• Imaging Features: cyst within enhancing tumor nodule.
 Well differentiated, low grade, simply
astrocytoma.
 Median age at diagnosis-35 years.
 Brainstem gliomas-childhood
 Ill defined non enhancing cerebral masses.
 Grossly poorly circumscribed.
 Lacks mitotic activity, microvascular
proliferation and necrosis
 Low MIB(Ki-67) proliferative index.
 90%-mutation in IDH1 and IDH2 encoding for
isocitrate dehydrogenase in citric acid cycle.
 IDH1 mutation-prognostic significance
 50%- loss of 17p and mutation in TP53.
Axial T1 Wtd. MRIAxial Flair MRI Post-Contrast Axial T1 Wtd. MRI
Non-enhancing tumor (arrow) involving the right temporal lobe.
GRADE II ASTROCYTOMA (LOW GRADE)
• Children and young adults
• Imaging Features: Non-enhancing tumors. Calcification can be seen.
 Mean age- fouth or fifth decade
 Some contrast enhancement on MRI.
 More cellular than grade II
 Presence of mitotic figures.
 High Ki67/MIB index
 High incidence of progression to GBM
 High frequency of TP53, IDH1, IDH2, RB, PTEN
 EFGR mutation-worse prognosis.
 Relative survival at 2 years-40% and at 5 years-
27%
Fig 2.2B: Axial T1 Wtd. MRIFig 2.2A: Axial Flair MRI Fig 2.2C: Post-Contrast Axial T1 Wtd. MRI Fig 2.2D: Post Contrast Coronal T1 Wtd. MRI
An ill-defined non-enhancing tumor (yellow arrows) is seen in the left parietal lobe with spotty areas of
enhancement (red arrows).
DIAGNOSIS: Anaplastic Astrocytoma
• Grade III Astrocytoma (WHO Classification)
• Usually seen between 40 – 60 years of age
• Imaging Features: Ill-defined non-enhancing tumor with or without
feeble enhancement.
 Previously known as glioblastoma multiforme
 Peak age of onset is 50-60yrs.
 Common in deep white matter, basal ganglia,
thalamus, rarely in cerebellum
 Grossly may appear circumscribed
 Microscopic infiltrates widely, often to other
hemisphere via corpus callosum.
 Multifocal
 Extracranial metastasis rare.
 Survival 1-1.5 yrs after treatment.
 Central yellow or white zone of necrosis and
hemorrhage surrounded by hyperemic ring of
endothelial hyperplasia.
 Surrounded by edematous brain (mixture of
vasogenic edema, tumour infiltrates and
gliosis)
 TP53, IDH1 and IDH2 mutation less common
in primary.
 30-40% have EFGR mutation
 MGMT mutation- favorable prognosis.
 Primary GBM
◦ Develops de novo from
glial cells
◦ Accounts for > 90% of
biopsied or resected cases
◦ Clinical history of 6 months
◦ Occurs in older patients
(median age: 60 years)
◦ EFGR mutation
 Secondary GBM
◦ Develops from low-grade or
anaplastic astrocytoma
 ~ 70% of lower grade
gliomas develop into
advanced disease within
5-10 years of diagnosis
◦ Comprises < 5% of GBM
cases
◦ Occurs in younger patients
(median age: 45 years)
◦ TP53, IDH1, IDH2
Fig 2.1B: Axial T1 Weighted
(Wtd.) MRI
Fig 2.1A: Axial Flair MRI Fig 2.1C: Post-Contrast Axial T1
Wtd. MRIAn irregular enhancing ring lesion (arrow) is seen involving the left parietal lobe. Tumor is associated with
edema (E) best noticed on FLAIR image (A).
DIAGNOSIS: GLIOBLASTOMA
E
• Grade IV Astrocytoma (WHO Classification)
• Older Patient
•Imaging Features: Tumor with irregular peripheral enhancement with
central necrosis.
 Average age of diagnosis-26 yrs.
 Involve cerebral cortex and overlying
meninges most common in temporal lobe.
 Bizzare giant cells
 Xanthomatous cells-foamy lipid filled
astrocytes seen in 1/4th cases.
 15-20% have malignant transformation.
 Survival 81% at 5 yrs and 70% at 10 yrs.
large well defined cystic mass in right temporo-parieto-occipital
region with mild vasogenic oedema and mass effects. Post-contrast rim
like enhancement of the cystic mass, with enhancing mural nodule
 Associated with tuberous sclerosis
 Gross- elongated, sausage like or lobulated
 Candle guttering-identical smaller masses on
walls of ventricle.
 Rich vascularity
 Pseudo-rosettes
 Hydrocephalus
 TSC1 and TSC2
 Inhibitors of mTOR found effective.
Hypo- to isointense to gray matter on T1, heterogeneously hyperintense
on FLAIR , T2 punctate hypointensities corresponding to calcium with
avid contrast enhancement.
 Seen in young to middle aged adults.
 Most common in frontal lobe
 Histopath- uniform round nuclei, bland
chromatin, perinuclear halo-Fried egg
 Rich branching capillary network-Chicken
wire
 50-80%-loss of 1p and 19q
 Favorable response to chemotherapy
 IDH1 and IDH2 mutation in grade II (84%) and
grade III (94%).
Hypointense on T1 hyperintense on T2 with no contrast enhancement
mass in rt. Frontal lobe.
 Most difficult to define
 Survival between astrocytoma and
oligodendroglioma.
 Usually grade and treated as
oligodendroglioma.
 Most common in first decade.
 Age<3 years have worse prognosis
 Children-infratentorial
 Adult-spinal
 Well circumscribed mass that compresses and
not infiltrates surrounding parenchyma
 May seed subarachnoid space in 5%
 Perivascular rosettes
 22q deletion in NF2 mutation-spinal
ependymoma.
 Seen in filum terminale
 More common in adults
 Thin collagenous capsule
 Prognosis excellent if capsule intact
 May metastasize to lungs
Hypointense mass on T1 and hyperintense with some hypointense signal
within due to hemorrhage within on T2
 Seen in adults
 Small and incidental
 Glistening pearly white lobulated
intraventricular proteburance
 Most often in fourth ventricle
 May cause hydrocephalus
 Low proliferative index
 Presenting symptoms determined by
 Tumour’s size,
 Location
 Rate of growth
 Classically (17%) starts in early morning and
disappears soon after pt. gets up
 Initially mild, becomes progressively more
severe, frequent and of longer duration
 Worse with Valsalva manoeuvre
 Associated with nausea,vomiting
 Forsyth, Posner(1993) showed tension-type
headache(77%), migraine-like headache
(9%),14% had mixture of headaches could not
be easily classified
 Forsyth (1993)- commonest headache site
was frontal region (68%) seen primarily in
supratentorial tumours or with raised ICT.
 73% of patients with infratentorial tumours
had frontal, temporal or parietal headaches
and 24% had nuchal and occipital.
 Related to size of tumour and amount of
midline shift.
 Produced due to traction on pain-sensitive
structures such as blood vessels, dura or
obstruction of CSF pathways
Recommendation Level
A patient with new onset or recurrent headache
uncharacteristic for that patient should also be
imaged, particularly if there are focal neurological
symptoms and signs.
III
Other symptoms
 Limb weakness
 Language disturbances
 Apraxia, agnosia
 Amnesia
 Depression
 Seizures- most common partial motor often
with secondary generalization
 Plateau waves- paroxysmal neurological
symptoms on standing
◦ A discrete or diffuse hypodense to isodense mass
lesion
◦ Minimal or no enhancement (except in 15 – 30%
patients)
◦ Calcifications
(Oligodendrogliomas/Oligoastrocytomas)
◦ Cystic changes (any histologic type)
◦ Hypo- to Iso-intense on T1WI
◦ Hyperintense on T2WI
◦ Minimal- to NO gadolinium enhancement
 (25 – 50% oligodendrogliomas are somewhat enhanced)
◦ No significant mass effect
◦ Tendency to invade & reside in white matter
 Oligodendrogliomas expands along gyri
◦ Calcifications (20% lesions)
 T1-weighted MRI with contrast may
underestimate the extent of an LGG
 The true extent is shown on the T2-
weighted sequences,
 Diffusion tensor MRI used as a marker of
glioma infiltration
 Reduced NAA peaks
 Increased choline peak
 Increased choline/creatinine ratio
 Choline/creatinine peak>3:1 predicts high
grade tumour.
Malignant Transformation:
LGG transformation ranges from 17% to 73% in
clinical studies
Risk of progression increases with tumour
burden
Growth rate of ≥ 8 mm per year  Median
survival of 5.16 years
Growth rate ≤ 8 mm/year  median survival of
≥ 15 years
Residual tumour after surgery is an important
determinant
Observation:
 Advantages:
 No surgical morbidity
 Lesser cost of follow up treatment
 Disadvantages:
 Loss of histological diagnosis
 Loss to follow up (quite frequent than reported)
 Risk of increased malignant transformation
 Risk of increasing tumour burden/neurodeficits
 Supportive treatment
 Antiepileptics- leviteracetam preferred.
Prophylactic antiepileptics not recommended.
 Enzyme inducers avoided.
 Steroids- Dexamethasone most commonly
used.
 Usual dose 8-16mg daily dose.
Surgical intervention:
 Open resection
 Open/stereotactic biopsy
 Guided by patient’s clinical status, location of tumour &
surgeon’s preference
 Goals of surgery:
 Establishing a diagnosis
 Symptoms alleviation
 Decompression
 Tumour cytoreduction
Biopsy:
 Open/Image guided or stereotactic (if available)
 Indicated in high risk patients or when open surgery is
declined/deferred
 Advantages:
 Minimally invasive
 Early identification of histologic type
 Disadvantages:
 Morbidity/mortality with open biopsy
 Image guided biopsy may sample wrong site
 Stereotactic biopsy may be too small for a diagnosis
Surgical Resection:
 It is the principle mode of treatment in the following;
 Whenever possible
 Mass effect
 Raised ICT
 Steroid resistant edema
 Threat of herniation
 CSF flow obstruction
 Seizure control
 Smaller tumours are less aggressive & better surgical
candidates
Surgery has limited role in following;
 Disseminated tumours
 Multifocal tumours
 Eloquent location
Extent of Resection:
◦ Recent evidence favouring early extensive resection
◦ Good life expectancy
◦ Influencing malignant transformation
◦ Progression free survival & overall survival both
improves
 Radiation for Pilocytic astrocytoma after surgery may be
reserved until recurrence or deep lesions
 Fractionated radiation of up to 45-60 Gy (more
focussed, more good)
 Hyperfraction protocol
 Provided to T2 abnormality and margin of 1.5 to 2 cm
 In sharply demarcated tumour 0.5cm margin suffice
 Adjvunt to surgery
 Malignant transformation may be treated with radiation
 Steriotactic radiosurgery-useful in well circumscribed
tumour.
 Brachytherapy
Chemotherapy:
 PCV (Procarbazine, Lomustine, Vincristine) may have a
role in stabilising tumour growth
 Temozolomide may have a role for progressive
astrocytoma
 Oligodendroglioma- chemosensitive
 Recurrence of anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma
multiforme
 Methylating agent
 Principal mechanism is causing damage to DNA
of tumour cell, leading to cell death
 Taken orally, rapidly absorbed
 Penetrates the blood-brain barrier
 TMZ 75 mg/m2 PO QD for 6 weeks, then 150-
200 mg/m2 PO QD on Days 1-5 every 28 days
for 6 cycles
 Used with radiotherapy
 No consensus
 Low dose temozolomide (+/- procarbazine)
 Carboplatin
 BCNU/CCNU
 Bevacizumab (+/- Irinotecan)
 EFGR inhibitors (geftinib)
 PDGFR inhibitors (imatinib)
 Clinical trials if possible
 BCNU(carmustine)-
infused wafers
 Implanted to tumour
bed at time of surgery
 Chemotherapy
released to
surrounding brain
tissue over a period of
2 to 3 weeks
 Clinical trials showed
survival benefit
 Prognosis
◦ Extremely young patients<3yrs or patients > 50 y
◦ Large tumours that enhance
◦ Short clinical history
◦ Absent of mental changes
◦ Cerebellar location
◦ High grade
◦ Completeness of surgical lesion
◦ Evidence of progression on imaging studies
 Clinical course is by no means benign as is manifested
by histology & radiologic appearance
 Aggressive early resection advised but NOT on the
expense of patient’s quality of life
 Diagnosis purely on the basis of radiology has a failure
rate of up to 50%
 Early histologic evidence of the diagnosis is paramount
both for the surgeon & the patient
 Chemo-radiotherapy can be delayed until recurrence
or progression in low grade gliomas.
Thanks
 Clinical practice guidelines for management
of gliomas: Clinical oncological society of
Australia; Aug2009.
 Malignant Gliomas in Adults;Patrick Y. Wen,
Santosh Kesari:N Engl J Med 2008; 359:492-
507
 Guidelines on management of low-grade
gliomas: report of an EFNS–EANO* Task
Force; European Journal of Neurology 2010,
17: 1124–1133
 High Grade Gliomas: Pathogenesis,
Management And Prognosis;ACNR :VOLUME
12 NUMBER 4 ;SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2012
 Practical Guidelines for the Treatment of
Malignant Gliomas;Marc C., Patty A., WJM,
February 1998-Vol 168, No. 2

More Related Content

What's hot

MEDULLOBLASTOMA
MEDULLOBLASTOMAMEDULLOBLASTOMA
MEDULLOBLASTOMA
suresh Bishokarma
 
Approach to the patients with brain metastases
Approach to the patients with brain metastasesApproach to the patients with brain metastases
Approach to the patients with brain metastases
Venkata pradeep babu koyyala
 
Brain Tumors
Brain TumorsBrain Tumors
Brain Tumors
Drhardik Patel
 
Overview of brain tumors
Overview of brain tumorsOverview of brain tumors
Overview of brain tumors
DrAyush Garg
 
Brain metastasis - Simplified
Brain metastasis - SimplifiedBrain metastasis - Simplified
Brain metastasis - Simplified
suresh Bishokarma
 
Low Grade Gliomas
Low  Grade  GliomasLow  Grade  Gliomas
Low Grade Gliomas
Arnab Bose
 
Glioblastoma Multiforme.Dr NG NeuroEdu
Glioblastoma Multiforme.Dr NG NeuroEduGlioblastoma Multiforme.Dr NG NeuroEdu
Glioblastoma Multiforme.Dr NG NeuroEduslneurosurgery
 
HIGH GRADE GLIOMA MANAGEMENT
HIGH GRADE GLIOMA MANAGEMENTHIGH GRADE GLIOMA MANAGEMENT
HIGH GRADE GLIOMA MANAGEMENT
Nabeel Yahiya
 
Radiation for Glioblastoma
Radiation for GlioblastomaRadiation for Glioblastoma
Radiation for Glioblastoma
Robert J Miller MD
 
High grade glioma kiran
High grade glioma  kiranHigh grade glioma  kiran
High grade glioma kiran
Kiran Ramakrishna
 
2021 WHO Classification of brain tumours.pptx
2021 WHO Classification of brain tumours.pptx2021 WHO Classification of brain tumours.pptx
2021 WHO Classification of brain tumours.pptx
RejoyceAnto
 
Brain Metastases: An Overview
Brain Metastases: An OverviewBrain Metastases: An Overview
Brain Metastases: An Overview
Bita Fakhri
 
Management of brain metastases
Management of brain metastasesManagement of brain metastases
Management of brain metastases
Shreya Singh
 
High Grade Glioma
High Grade GliomaHigh Grade Glioma
High Grade Glioma
DrAyush Garg
 
Brain stem gliomas
Brain stem gliomasBrain stem gliomas
Brain stem gliomas
Dr Himanshu Soni
 
Cns tumors
Cns tumorsCns tumors
Cns tumors
test
 
Meningioma final
Meningioma finalMeningioma final
Meningioma final
DrAyush Garg
 

What's hot (20)

MEDULLOBLASTOMA
MEDULLOBLASTOMAMEDULLOBLASTOMA
MEDULLOBLASTOMA
 
Approach to the patients with brain metastases
Approach to the patients with brain metastasesApproach to the patients with brain metastases
Approach to the patients with brain metastases
 
Glioblastoma Multiforme
Glioblastoma MultiformeGlioblastoma Multiforme
Glioblastoma Multiforme
 
Brain Tumors
Brain TumorsBrain Tumors
Brain Tumors
 
Overview of brain tumors
Overview of brain tumorsOverview of brain tumors
Overview of brain tumors
 
Brain metastasis - Simplified
Brain metastasis - SimplifiedBrain metastasis - Simplified
Brain metastasis - Simplified
 
Low Grade Gliomas
Low  Grade  GliomasLow  Grade  Gliomas
Low Grade Gliomas
 
Glioblastoma Multiforme.Dr NG NeuroEdu
Glioblastoma Multiforme.Dr NG NeuroEduGlioblastoma Multiforme.Dr NG NeuroEdu
Glioblastoma Multiforme.Dr NG NeuroEdu
 
HIGH GRADE GLIOMA MANAGEMENT
HIGH GRADE GLIOMA MANAGEMENTHIGH GRADE GLIOMA MANAGEMENT
HIGH GRADE GLIOMA MANAGEMENT
 
Radiation for Glioblastoma
Radiation for GlioblastomaRadiation for Glioblastoma
Radiation for Glioblastoma
 
High grade glioma kiran
High grade glioma  kiranHigh grade glioma  kiran
High grade glioma kiran
 
2021 WHO Classification of brain tumours.pptx
2021 WHO Classification of brain tumours.pptx2021 WHO Classification of brain tumours.pptx
2021 WHO Classification of brain tumours.pptx
 
Brain Metastases: An Overview
Brain Metastases: An OverviewBrain Metastases: An Overview
Brain Metastases: An Overview
 
Management of brain metastases
Management of brain metastasesManagement of brain metastases
Management of brain metastases
 
High Grade Glioma
High Grade GliomaHigh Grade Glioma
High Grade Glioma
 
Glioblastoma
GlioblastomaGlioblastoma
Glioblastoma
 
Brain stem gliomas
Brain stem gliomasBrain stem gliomas
Brain stem gliomas
 
Medulloblastomas
MedulloblastomasMedulloblastomas
Medulloblastomas
 
Cns tumors
Cns tumorsCns tumors
Cns tumors
 
Meningioma final
Meningioma finalMeningioma final
Meningioma final
 

Viewers also liked

Classification of brain tumors AND MANAGEMENT OG LOW GRADE GLIOMA
Classification of brain tumors AND MANAGEMENT OG LOW GRADE GLIOMAClassification of brain tumors AND MANAGEMENT OG LOW GRADE GLIOMA
Classification of brain tumors AND MANAGEMENT OG LOW GRADE GLIOMA
radiation oncology
 
High grade glioma, standard of care & new advances..
High grade glioma, standard of care & new advances.. High grade glioma, standard of care & new advances..
High grade glioma, standard of care & new advances..
Osama Elzaafarany, MD.
 
Recent advances in Glioblastoma Multiforme Management
Recent advances in Glioblastoma Multiforme ManagementRecent advances in Glioblastoma Multiforme Management
Recent advances in Glioblastoma Multiforme Management
Rajesh Balakrishnan
 
Low grade glioma evidence based management
Low grade glioma evidence based managementLow grade glioma evidence based management
Low grade glioma evidence based management
Gaurav Kumar
 
Brain tumour patient forum Kerrie McDonald Research development and early pha...
Brain tumour patient forum Kerrie McDonald Research development and early pha...Brain tumour patient forum Kerrie McDonald Research development and early pha...
Brain tumour patient forum Kerrie McDonald Research development and early pha...
Cure Brain Cancer Foundation
 
Osteomyelitis
OsteomyelitisOsteomyelitis
Osteomyelitispunita85
 
Glioblastoma Presentation
Glioblastoma PresentationGlioblastoma Presentation
Glioblastoma Presentation
Student Wilsonsbiologylab
 
Neuro-Oncology for the Radiation Oncologist - Gliomas
Neuro-Oncology for the Radiation Oncologist - GliomasNeuro-Oncology for the Radiation Oncologist - Gliomas
Neuro-Oncology for the Radiation Oncologist - Gliomas
Emil Lou, M.D., Ph.D, FACP
 
Glioblastoma multiforme
Glioblastoma multiformeGlioblastoma multiforme
Glioblastoma multiforme
Anderson Burbano
 
Glioblastoma vibhay
Glioblastoma vibhayGlioblastoma vibhay
Glioblastoma vibhay
Vibhay Pareek
 
Acute and Chronic Osteomyelitis - Infection of Bone
Acute and Chronic Osteomyelitis - Infection of BoneAcute and Chronic Osteomyelitis - Infection of Bone
Acute and Chronic Osteomyelitis - Infection of Bone
Rahul Singh
 

Viewers also liked (13)

Classification of brain tumors AND MANAGEMENT OG LOW GRADE GLIOMA
Classification of brain tumors AND MANAGEMENT OG LOW GRADE GLIOMAClassification of brain tumors AND MANAGEMENT OG LOW GRADE GLIOMA
Classification of brain tumors AND MANAGEMENT OG LOW GRADE GLIOMA
 
High grade glioma, standard of care & new advances..
High grade glioma, standard of care & new advances.. High grade glioma, standard of care & new advances..
High grade glioma, standard of care & new advances..
 
Recent advances in Glioblastoma Multiforme Management
Recent advances in Glioblastoma Multiforme ManagementRecent advances in Glioblastoma Multiforme Management
Recent advances in Glioblastoma Multiforme Management
 
Low grade glioma evidence based management
Low grade glioma evidence based managementLow grade glioma evidence based management
Low grade glioma evidence based management
 
Brain tumour patient forum Kerrie McDonald Research development and early pha...
Brain tumour patient forum Kerrie McDonald Research development and early pha...Brain tumour patient forum Kerrie McDonald Research development and early pha...
Brain tumour patient forum Kerrie McDonald Research development and early pha...
 
Osteomyelitis
OsteomyelitisOsteomyelitis
Osteomyelitis
 
Glioblastoma Presentation
Glioblastoma PresentationGlioblastoma Presentation
Glioblastoma Presentation
 
Osteomyelitis
OsteomyelitisOsteomyelitis
Osteomyelitis
 
Neuro-Oncology for the Radiation Oncologist - Gliomas
Neuro-Oncology for the Radiation Oncologist - GliomasNeuro-Oncology for the Radiation Oncologist - Gliomas
Neuro-Oncology for the Radiation Oncologist - Gliomas
 
Glioblastoma multiforme
Glioblastoma multiformeGlioblastoma multiforme
Glioblastoma multiforme
 
Glioblastoma vibhay
Glioblastoma vibhayGlioblastoma vibhay
Glioblastoma vibhay
 
Glioblastoma Multiforme
Glioblastoma MultiformeGlioblastoma Multiforme
Glioblastoma Multiforme
 
Acute and Chronic Osteomyelitis - Infection of Bone
Acute and Chronic Osteomyelitis - Infection of BoneAcute and Chronic Osteomyelitis - Infection of Bone
Acute and Chronic Osteomyelitis - Infection of Bone
 

Similar to Essentials of gliomas

Pineal region tumors
Pineal region tumorsPineal region tumors
Pineal region tumors
Govind Gaikwad
 
Brain spinal tumors
Brain spinal tumorsBrain spinal tumors
Brain spinal tumors
Man B Paudyal
 
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 6
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 6Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 6
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 6
Surgical Neurology International
 
Cns tumors bikash
Cns tumors  bikashCns tumors  bikash
Cns tumors bikash
Bikash Praharaj
 
IMAGING OF INFRATENTORIAL BRAIN TUMORS.pptx
IMAGING OF INFRATENTORIAL BRAIN TUMORS.pptxIMAGING OF INFRATENTORIAL BRAIN TUMORS.pptx
IMAGING OF INFRATENTORIAL BRAIN TUMORS.pptx
Arya Anish
 
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 8
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 8Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 8
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 8
Surgical Neurology International
 
Pediatric brain tumors
Pediatric brain tumorsPediatric brain tumors
Pediatric brain tumors
Prashant Pote
 
Spinal tumour lecture - copy
Spinal tumour   lecture - copySpinal tumour   lecture - copy
Spinal tumour lecture - copy
wasek_bd
 
Brain tumours part2
Brain tumours part2Brain tumours part2
Brain tumours part2
Vrishit Saraswat
 
Spinal cord lesions and its radiological imaging finding.
Spinal cord lesions and its radiological imaging finding.Spinal cord lesions and its radiological imaging finding.
Spinal cord lesions and its radiological imaging finding.
Navneet Ranjan
 
Parapharyngeal swellings
Parapharyngeal swellingsParapharyngeal swellings
Parapharyngeal swellings
Mai Hatem
 
Management of gliomas
Management of gliomasManagement of gliomas
Management of gliomas
Jasmeet Tuteja
 
CNS tumors and Neuroblastomas
CNS tumors and NeuroblastomasCNS tumors and Neuroblastomas
CNS tumors and NeuroblastomasSariu Ali
 
Neuroblatoma
NeuroblatomaNeuroblatoma
Neuroblatoma
MD RADIODIAGNOSIS
 
Brain tumors in children with Updates- Pranav
Brain tumors in children with Updates- PranavBrain tumors in children with Updates- Pranav
Brain tumors in children with Updates- Pranav
Pranav S
 
Imaging in pediatric brain tumors
Imaging in pediatric brain tumorsImaging in pediatric brain tumors
Imaging in pediatric brain tumors
Dr.Suhas Basavaiah
 
Intracranial neoplasm
Intracranial neoplasmIntracranial neoplasm
Intracranial neoplasm
Milan Silwal
 
CT Scan: Glioblastoma Multiforme
CT Scan: Glioblastoma MultiformeCT Scan: Glioblastoma Multiforme
CT Scan: Glioblastoma Multiformegueste19bfb0
 

Similar to Essentials of gliomas (20)

Pineal region tumors
Pineal region tumorsPineal region tumors
Pineal region tumors
 
Brain spinal tumors
Brain spinal tumorsBrain spinal tumors
Brain spinal tumors
 
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 6
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 6Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 6
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 6
 
Cns tumors bikash
Cns tumors  bikashCns tumors  bikash
Cns tumors bikash
 
IMAGING OF INFRATENTORIAL BRAIN TUMORS.pptx
IMAGING OF INFRATENTORIAL BRAIN TUMORS.pptxIMAGING OF INFRATENTORIAL BRAIN TUMORS.pptx
IMAGING OF INFRATENTORIAL BRAIN TUMORS.pptx
 
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 6
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 6Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 6
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 6
 
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 8
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 8Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 8
Harbor UCLA Neuro-Radiology Case 8
 
Pediatric brain tumors
Pediatric brain tumorsPediatric brain tumors
Pediatric brain tumors
 
Spinal tumour lecture - copy
Spinal tumour   lecture - copySpinal tumour   lecture - copy
Spinal tumour lecture - copy
 
Brain tumours part2
Brain tumours part2Brain tumours part2
Brain tumours part2
 
Spinal cord lesions and its radiological imaging finding.
Spinal cord lesions and its radiological imaging finding.Spinal cord lesions and its radiological imaging finding.
Spinal cord lesions and its radiological imaging finding.
 
Parapharyngeal swellings
Parapharyngeal swellingsParapharyngeal swellings
Parapharyngeal swellings
 
Management of gliomas
Management of gliomasManagement of gliomas
Management of gliomas
 
CNS tumors and Neuroblastomas
CNS tumors and NeuroblastomasCNS tumors and Neuroblastomas
CNS tumors and Neuroblastomas
 
Neuroblatoma
NeuroblatomaNeuroblatoma
Neuroblatoma
 
Brain tumors in children with Updates- Pranav
Brain tumors in children with Updates- PranavBrain tumors in children with Updates- Pranav
Brain tumors in children with Updates- Pranav
 
Imaging in pediatric brain tumors
Imaging in pediatric brain tumorsImaging in pediatric brain tumors
Imaging in pediatric brain tumors
 
Intracranial neoplasm
Intracranial neoplasmIntracranial neoplasm
Intracranial neoplasm
 
CT Scan: Glioblastoma Multiforme
CT Scan: Glioblastoma MultiformeCT Scan: Glioblastoma Multiforme
CT Scan: Glioblastoma Multiforme
 
CT:Glioblastoma Multiforme
CT:Glioblastoma MultiformeCT:Glioblastoma Multiforme
CT:Glioblastoma Multiforme
 

More from NeurologyKota

CONCEPT OF NODOPATHIES AND PARANODOPATHIES.pptx
CONCEPT OF NODOPATHIES AND PARANODOPATHIES.pptxCONCEPT OF NODOPATHIES AND PARANODOPATHIES.pptx
CONCEPT OF NODOPATHIES AND PARANODOPATHIES.pptx
NeurologyKota
 
NEUROLOGICAL SCALES FOR ASSESSMENT OF CONSCIOUSNESS.pptx
NEUROLOGICAL SCALES FOR ASSESSMENT OF CONSCIOUSNESS.pptxNEUROLOGICAL SCALES FOR ASSESSMENT OF CONSCIOUSNESS.pptx
NEUROLOGICAL SCALES FOR ASSESSMENT OF CONSCIOUSNESS.pptx
NeurologyKota
 
LOCALISATION OF LESION CAUSING COMA.pptx
LOCALISATION OF LESION CAUSING COMA.pptxLOCALISATION OF LESION CAUSING COMA.pptx
LOCALISATION OF LESION CAUSING COMA.pptx
NeurologyKota
 
TREADMILL For_BRAIN_Dr Bharat Bhushan sir.pptx
TREADMILL For_BRAIN_Dr Bharat Bhushan sir.pptxTREADMILL For_BRAIN_Dr Bharat Bhushan sir.pptx
TREADMILL For_BRAIN_Dr Bharat Bhushan sir.pptx
NeurologyKota
 
REMOTE ROBOTIC.pptx
REMOTE ROBOTIC.pptxREMOTE ROBOTIC.pptx
REMOTE ROBOTIC.pptx
NeurologyKota
 
DUAL AND TRIPLE ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY FOR SECONDARY STROKE [Autosaved].pptx
DUAL AND TRIPLE ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY FOR SECONDARY STROKE [Autosaved].pptxDUAL AND TRIPLE ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY FOR SECONDARY STROKE [Autosaved].pptx
DUAL AND TRIPLE ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY FOR SECONDARY STROKE [Autosaved].pptx
NeurologyKota
 
SMART WEARABLE DEVICES IN NEUROLOGY new.pptx
SMART WEARABLE DEVICES IN NEUROLOGY new.pptxSMART WEARABLE DEVICES IN NEUROLOGY new.pptx
SMART WEARABLE DEVICES IN NEUROLOGY new.pptx
NeurologyKota
 
ASSESSMENT OF AUTONOMIC FUNCTION TEST.pptx
ASSESSMENT OF AUTONOMIC FUNCTION TEST.pptxASSESSMENT OF AUTONOMIC FUNCTION TEST.pptx
ASSESSMENT OF AUTONOMIC FUNCTION TEST.pptx
NeurologyKota
 
TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER (1).pptx
TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER (1).pptxTRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER (1).pptx
TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER (1).pptx
NeurologyKota
 
INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE IN YOUNG ADULTS.pptx
INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE IN YOUNG ADULTS.pptxINTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE IN YOUNG ADULTS.pptx
INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE IN YOUNG ADULTS.pptx
NeurologyKota
 
CAROTID WEB.pptx
CAROTID WEB.pptxCAROTID WEB.pptx
CAROTID WEB.pptx
NeurologyKota
 
CNS IRIS.pptx
CNS IRIS.pptxCNS IRIS.pptx
CNS IRIS.pptx
NeurologyKota
 
EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY  EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
NeurologyKota
 
Domain Assessment in Dementia.pptx
Domain Assessment in Dementia.pptxDomain Assessment in Dementia.pptx
Domain Assessment in Dementia.pptx
NeurologyKota
 
Young Onset Dementia.pptx
Young Onset Dementia.pptxYoung Onset Dementia.pptx
Young Onset Dementia.pptx
NeurologyKota
 
ENCEPHALOPATHY
ENCEPHALOPATHY ENCEPHALOPATHY
ENCEPHALOPATHY
NeurologyKota
 
NEWER INSIGHT IN FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER
NEWER INSIGHT IN FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER NEWER INSIGHT IN FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER
NEWER INSIGHT IN FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER
NeurologyKota
 
Hyperthermic syndrome in ICU and their management.pptx
Hyperthermic syndrome in ICU and their management.pptxHyperthermic syndrome in ICU and their management.pptx
Hyperthermic syndrome in ICU and their management.pptx
NeurologyKota
 
Entrapment Syndromes of Lower Limb.pptx
Entrapment Syndromes of Lower Limb.pptxEntrapment Syndromes of Lower Limb.pptx
Entrapment Syndromes of Lower Limb.pptx
NeurologyKota
 
MOG and IgG-4 related Neurological manifestation.pptx
MOG and IgG-4 related Neurological manifestation.pptxMOG and IgG-4 related Neurological manifestation.pptx
MOG and IgG-4 related Neurological manifestation.pptx
NeurologyKota
 

More from NeurologyKota (20)

CONCEPT OF NODOPATHIES AND PARANODOPATHIES.pptx
CONCEPT OF NODOPATHIES AND PARANODOPATHIES.pptxCONCEPT OF NODOPATHIES AND PARANODOPATHIES.pptx
CONCEPT OF NODOPATHIES AND PARANODOPATHIES.pptx
 
NEUROLOGICAL SCALES FOR ASSESSMENT OF CONSCIOUSNESS.pptx
NEUROLOGICAL SCALES FOR ASSESSMENT OF CONSCIOUSNESS.pptxNEUROLOGICAL SCALES FOR ASSESSMENT OF CONSCIOUSNESS.pptx
NEUROLOGICAL SCALES FOR ASSESSMENT OF CONSCIOUSNESS.pptx
 
LOCALISATION OF LESION CAUSING COMA.pptx
LOCALISATION OF LESION CAUSING COMA.pptxLOCALISATION OF LESION CAUSING COMA.pptx
LOCALISATION OF LESION CAUSING COMA.pptx
 
TREADMILL For_BRAIN_Dr Bharat Bhushan sir.pptx
TREADMILL For_BRAIN_Dr Bharat Bhushan sir.pptxTREADMILL For_BRAIN_Dr Bharat Bhushan sir.pptx
TREADMILL For_BRAIN_Dr Bharat Bhushan sir.pptx
 
REMOTE ROBOTIC.pptx
REMOTE ROBOTIC.pptxREMOTE ROBOTIC.pptx
REMOTE ROBOTIC.pptx
 
DUAL AND TRIPLE ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY FOR SECONDARY STROKE [Autosaved].pptx
DUAL AND TRIPLE ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY FOR SECONDARY STROKE [Autosaved].pptxDUAL AND TRIPLE ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY FOR SECONDARY STROKE [Autosaved].pptx
DUAL AND TRIPLE ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY FOR SECONDARY STROKE [Autosaved].pptx
 
SMART WEARABLE DEVICES IN NEUROLOGY new.pptx
SMART WEARABLE DEVICES IN NEUROLOGY new.pptxSMART WEARABLE DEVICES IN NEUROLOGY new.pptx
SMART WEARABLE DEVICES IN NEUROLOGY new.pptx
 
ASSESSMENT OF AUTONOMIC FUNCTION TEST.pptx
ASSESSMENT OF AUTONOMIC FUNCTION TEST.pptxASSESSMENT OF AUTONOMIC FUNCTION TEST.pptx
ASSESSMENT OF AUTONOMIC FUNCTION TEST.pptx
 
TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER (1).pptx
TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER (1).pptxTRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER (1).pptx
TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER (1).pptx
 
INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE IN YOUNG ADULTS.pptx
INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE IN YOUNG ADULTS.pptxINTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE IN YOUNG ADULTS.pptx
INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE IN YOUNG ADULTS.pptx
 
CAROTID WEB.pptx
CAROTID WEB.pptxCAROTID WEB.pptx
CAROTID WEB.pptx
 
CNS IRIS.pptx
CNS IRIS.pptxCNS IRIS.pptx
CNS IRIS.pptx
 
EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY  EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
 
Domain Assessment in Dementia.pptx
Domain Assessment in Dementia.pptxDomain Assessment in Dementia.pptx
Domain Assessment in Dementia.pptx
 
Young Onset Dementia.pptx
Young Onset Dementia.pptxYoung Onset Dementia.pptx
Young Onset Dementia.pptx
 
ENCEPHALOPATHY
ENCEPHALOPATHY ENCEPHALOPATHY
ENCEPHALOPATHY
 
NEWER INSIGHT IN FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER
NEWER INSIGHT IN FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER NEWER INSIGHT IN FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER
NEWER INSIGHT IN FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER
 
Hyperthermic syndrome in ICU and their management.pptx
Hyperthermic syndrome in ICU and their management.pptxHyperthermic syndrome in ICU and their management.pptx
Hyperthermic syndrome in ICU and their management.pptx
 
Entrapment Syndromes of Lower Limb.pptx
Entrapment Syndromes of Lower Limb.pptxEntrapment Syndromes of Lower Limb.pptx
Entrapment Syndromes of Lower Limb.pptx
 
MOG and IgG-4 related Neurological manifestation.pptx
MOG and IgG-4 related Neurological manifestation.pptxMOG and IgG-4 related Neurological manifestation.pptx
MOG and IgG-4 related Neurological manifestation.pptx
 

Essentials of gliomas

  • 1. Dr. Parag Moon Senior resident, Dept. of Neurology GMC, Kota
  • 2.  CNS tumors can primarily be divided into  Primary -originates in the brain (solitary, nodular)  Secondary-made up of cells that have spread (metastasized) to the brain from somewhere else in the body.  Multiple in number, prior h/o cancer , edema +, located at gray white interface.  May lodge into - Brain parenchyma – most common area of metastases - Leptomeninges – pia mater & arachnoid mater - Dural space
  • 3.  Tumors of Neuroepithelial Tissue  Tumors of Cranial and Spinal Nerves  Tumors of Meninges  Lymphomas and Hematopoietic Neoplasm  Germ Cell Tumor  Tumors of Sellar Regions (pituitary /craniopharyngioma)  Metastatic Tumors
  • 4.  Many grading systems (e.g., Kernohan, St. Anne-Mayo, and Ringertz systems)  Most of these grading systems share an assessment of nuclear abnormalities, mitoses, endothelial proliferation, and necrosis
  • 5.  WHO grade I – low proliferative potential. Possible cure with surgery alone  WHO grade II – infiltrating, but low in mitotic activity. Can recur and progress to other grades  WHO grade III – Histologic evidence of malignancy (mitotic activity), infiltrative, anaplastic  WHO grade IV – mitotically active, necrosis, rapid pre and post-surgical progression
  • 6. Cell of origin can be 1. Astrocytes 2. Oligodendrocytes 3. Ependymal cells 4. Mixed  Identified by glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and S100
  • 7.  Gliomas-Most common (80%) primary malignant brain tumours.  Gliobastoma accounts for 54%.  Most common is astrocytoma (including gliobastoma)-76%.  Slight male preponderance.  More common in whites.
  • 8.  Exposure to ionizing radiations is the only definite risk factor  They are common in;  NF type I (15 – 20% develop LGGs)  NF type II  Tuberous sclerosis  Li-Fraumeni syndrome  Environmental exposure to Nitrites/Nitrates (nitrosamines/amides)  Radiofrequency radiation.  Electromagnetic field radiation(EMF)
  • 9.  Allergies/IgE levels association  Vit. E and C consumption.  Head trauma  Tobacco, alcohol consumption  p53 gene mutation (a consistent finding)  1p/19q mutations in tumours transforming to high grade
  • 11.  Well circumscribed both grossly and radiologically.  More common in cerebellum, third ventricle, hypothalamus, optic nerve, spinal cord, dorsal brainstem.  Cerebellar-large fluid filled cyst with enhancing nodule.  Hyothalamus, optic nerve- solid tumours.  Outcome excellent (80% 20-year survival)
  • 12.  Biphasic pattern- compact pilocytic areas with interspersed microcytic, loose and spongy areas.  Rosenthal fibres  Mulberry shaped eosinophilic granular inclusion  Pilomyxoid astrocytoma-variant, more aggressive, affects children younger than 3 years
  • 13. Fig 2.4B: Axial T1 Wtd. MRIFig 2.4A: Axial T2 Wtd. MRI Fig 2.4C: Post-Contrast Axial T1 Wtd. MRI A large cystic tumor (yellow arrow) with a mural enhancing nodule (red arrow) is seen within the left cerebellar hemisphere. DIAGNOSIS: PILOCYTIC ASTROCYTOMA • Grade I Astrocytoma (WHO Classification) • Children and young adults • Imaging Features: cyst within enhancing tumor nodule.
  • 14.  Well differentiated, low grade, simply astrocytoma.  Median age at diagnosis-35 years.  Brainstem gliomas-childhood  Ill defined non enhancing cerebral masses.  Grossly poorly circumscribed.  Lacks mitotic activity, microvascular proliferation and necrosis  Low MIB(Ki-67) proliferative index.
  • 15.  90%-mutation in IDH1 and IDH2 encoding for isocitrate dehydrogenase in citric acid cycle.  IDH1 mutation-prognostic significance  50%- loss of 17p and mutation in TP53.
  • 16. Axial T1 Wtd. MRIAxial Flair MRI Post-Contrast Axial T1 Wtd. MRI Non-enhancing tumor (arrow) involving the right temporal lobe. GRADE II ASTROCYTOMA (LOW GRADE) • Children and young adults • Imaging Features: Non-enhancing tumors. Calcification can be seen.
  • 17.  Mean age- fouth or fifth decade  Some contrast enhancement on MRI.  More cellular than grade II  Presence of mitotic figures.  High Ki67/MIB index  High incidence of progression to GBM  High frequency of TP53, IDH1, IDH2, RB, PTEN  EFGR mutation-worse prognosis.  Relative survival at 2 years-40% and at 5 years- 27%
  • 18. Fig 2.2B: Axial T1 Wtd. MRIFig 2.2A: Axial Flair MRI Fig 2.2C: Post-Contrast Axial T1 Wtd. MRI Fig 2.2D: Post Contrast Coronal T1 Wtd. MRI An ill-defined non-enhancing tumor (yellow arrows) is seen in the left parietal lobe with spotty areas of enhancement (red arrows). DIAGNOSIS: Anaplastic Astrocytoma • Grade III Astrocytoma (WHO Classification) • Usually seen between 40 – 60 years of age • Imaging Features: Ill-defined non-enhancing tumor with or without feeble enhancement.
  • 19.  Previously known as glioblastoma multiforme  Peak age of onset is 50-60yrs.  Common in deep white matter, basal ganglia, thalamus, rarely in cerebellum  Grossly may appear circumscribed  Microscopic infiltrates widely, often to other hemisphere via corpus callosum.  Multifocal  Extracranial metastasis rare.  Survival 1-1.5 yrs after treatment.
  • 20.  Central yellow or white zone of necrosis and hemorrhage surrounded by hyperemic ring of endothelial hyperplasia.  Surrounded by edematous brain (mixture of vasogenic edema, tumour infiltrates and gliosis)  TP53, IDH1 and IDH2 mutation less common in primary.  30-40% have EFGR mutation  MGMT mutation- favorable prognosis.
  • 21.  Primary GBM ◦ Develops de novo from glial cells ◦ Accounts for > 90% of biopsied or resected cases ◦ Clinical history of 6 months ◦ Occurs in older patients (median age: 60 years) ◦ EFGR mutation  Secondary GBM ◦ Develops from low-grade or anaplastic astrocytoma  ~ 70% of lower grade gliomas develop into advanced disease within 5-10 years of diagnosis ◦ Comprises < 5% of GBM cases ◦ Occurs in younger patients (median age: 45 years) ◦ TP53, IDH1, IDH2
  • 22. Fig 2.1B: Axial T1 Weighted (Wtd.) MRI Fig 2.1A: Axial Flair MRI Fig 2.1C: Post-Contrast Axial T1 Wtd. MRIAn irregular enhancing ring lesion (arrow) is seen involving the left parietal lobe. Tumor is associated with edema (E) best noticed on FLAIR image (A). DIAGNOSIS: GLIOBLASTOMA E • Grade IV Astrocytoma (WHO Classification) • Older Patient •Imaging Features: Tumor with irregular peripheral enhancement with central necrosis.
  • 23.  Average age of diagnosis-26 yrs.  Involve cerebral cortex and overlying meninges most common in temporal lobe.  Bizzare giant cells  Xanthomatous cells-foamy lipid filled astrocytes seen in 1/4th cases.  15-20% have malignant transformation.  Survival 81% at 5 yrs and 70% at 10 yrs.
  • 24. large well defined cystic mass in right temporo-parieto-occipital region with mild vasogenic oedema and mass effects. Post-contrast rim like enhancement of the cystic mass, with enhancing mural nodule
  • 25.  Associated with tuberous sclerosis  Gross- elongated, sausage like or lobulated  Candle guttering-identical smaller masses on walls of ventricle.  Rich vascularity  Pseudo-rosettes  Hydrocephalus  TSC1 and TSC2  Inhibitors of mTOR found effective.
  • 26. Hypo- to isointense to gray matter on T1, heterogeneously hyperintense on FLAIR , T2 punctate hypointensities corresponding to calcium with avid contrast enhancement.
  • 27.  Seen in young to middle aged adults.  Most common in frontal lobe  Histopath- uniform round nuclei, bland chromatin, perinuclear halo-Fried egg  Rich branching capillary network-Chicken wire  50-80%-loss of 1p and 19q  Favorable response to chemotherapy  IDH1 and IDH2 mutation in grade II (84%) and grade III (94%).
  • 28. Hypointense on T1 hyperintense on T2 with no contrast enhancement mass in rt. Frontal lobe.
  • 29.  Most difficult to define  Survival between astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma.  Usually grade and treated as oligodendroglioma.
  • 30.  Most common in first decade.  Age<3 years have worse prognosis  Children-infratentorial  Adult-spinal  Well circumscribed mass that compresses and not infiltrates surrounding parenchyma  May seed subarachnoid space in 5%  Perivascular rosettes  22q deletion in NF2 mutation-spinal ependymoma.
  • 31.
  • 32.  Seen in filum terminale  More common in adults  Thin collagenous capsule  Prognosis excellent if capsule intact  May metastasize to lungs
  • 33. Hypointense mass on T1 and hyperintense with some hypointense signal within due to hemorrhage within on T2
  • 34.  Seen in adults  Small and incidental  Glistening pearly white lobulated intraventricular proteburance  Most often in fourth ventricle  May cause hydrocephalus  Low proliferative index
  • 35.  Presenting symptoms determined by  Tumour’s size,  Location  Rate of growth
  • 36.  Classically (17%) starts in early morning and disappears soon after pt. gets up  Initially mild, becomes progressively more severe, frequent and of longer duration  Worse with Valsalva manoeuvre  Associated with nausea,vomiting  Forsyth, Posner(1993) showed tension-type headache(77%), migraine-like headache (9%),14% had mixture of headaches could not be easily classified
  • 37.  Forsyth (1993)- commonest headache site was frontal region (68%) seen primarily in supratentorial tumours or with raised ICT.  73% of patients with infratentorial tumours had frontal, temporal or parietal headaches and 24% had nuchal and occipital.  Related to size of tumour and amount of midline shift.  Produced due to traction on pain-sensitive structures such as blood vessels, dura or obstruction of CSF pathways
  • 38. Recommendation Level A patient with new onset or recurrent headache uncharacteristic for that patient should also be imaged, particularly if there are focal neurological symptoms and signs. III
  • 39. Other symptoms  Limb weakness  Language disturbances  Apraxia, agnosia  Amnesia  Depression  Seizures- most common partial motor often with secondary generalization  Plateau waves- paroxysmal neurological symptoms on standing
  • 40.
  • 41. ◦ A discrete or diffuse hypodense to isodense mass lesion ◦ Minimal or no enhancement (except in 15 – 30% patients) ◦ Calcifications (Oligodendrogliomas/Oligoastrocytomas) ◦ Cystic changes (any histologic type)
  • 42.
  • 43. ◦ Hypo- to Iso-intense on T1WI ◦ Hyperintense on T2WI ◦ Minimal- to NO gadolinium enhancement  (25 – 50% oligodendrogliomas are somewhat enhanced) ◦ No significant mass effect ◦ Tendency to invade & reside in white matter  Oligodendrogliomas expands along gyri ◦ Calcifications (20% lesions)
  • 44.
  • 45.  T1-weighted MRI with contrast may underestimate the extent of an LGG  The true extent is shown on the T2- weighted sequences,  Diffusion tensor MRI used as a marker of glioma infiltration
  • 46.  Reduced NAA peaks  Increased choline peak  Increased choline/creatinine ratio  Choline/creatinine peak>3:1 predicts high grade tumour.
  • 47.
  • 48. Malignant Transformation: LGG transformation ranges from 17% to 73% in clinical studies Risk of progression increases with tumour burden Growth rate of ≥ 8 mm per year  Median survival of 5.16 years Growth rate ≤ 8 mm/year  median survival of ≥ 15 years Residual tumour after surgery is an important determinant
  • 49. Observation:  Advantages:  No surgical morbidity  Lesser cost of follow up treatment  Disadvantages:  Loss of histological diagnosis  Loss to follow up (quite frequent than reported)  Risk of increased malignant transformation  Risk of increasing tumour burden/neurodeficits
  • 50.  Supportive treatment  Antiepileptics- leviteracetam preferred. Prophylactic antiepileptics not recommended.  Enzyme inducers avoided.  Steroids- Dexamethasone most commonly used.  Usual dose 8-16mg daily dose.
  • 51. Surgical intervention:  Open resection  Open/stereotactic biopsy  Guided by patient’s clinical status, location of tumour & surgeon’s preference  Goals of surgery:  Establishing a diagnosis  Symptoms alleviation  Decompression  Tumour cytoreduction
  • 52. Biopsy:  Open/Image guided or stereotactic (if available)  Indicated in high risk patients or when open surgery is declined/deferred  Advantages:  Minimally invasive  Early identification of histologic type  Disadvantages:  Morbidity/mortality with open biopsy  Image guided biopsy may sample wrong site  Stereotactic biopsy may be too small for a diagnosis
  • 53. Surgical Resection:  It is the principle mode of treatment in the following;  Whenever possible  Mass effect  Raised ICT  Steroid resistant edema  Threat of herniation  CSF flow obstruction  Seizure control  Smaller tumours are less aggressive & better surgical candidates
  • 54. Surgery has limited role in following;  Disseminated tumours  Multifocal tumours  Eloquent location Extent of Resection: ◦ Recent evidence favouring early extensive resection ◦ Good life expectancy ◦ Influencing malignant transformation ◦ Progression free survival & overall survival both improves
  • 55.  Radiation for Pilocytic astrocytoma after surgery may be reserved until recurrence or deep lesions  Fractionated radiation of up to 45-60 Gy (more focussed, more good)  Hyperfraction protocol  Provided to T2 abnormality and margin of 1.5 to 2 cm  In sharply demarcated tumour 0.5cm margin suffice  Adjvunt to surgery  Malignant transformation may be treated with radiation  Steriotactic radiosurgery-useful in well circumscribed tumour.  Brachytherapy
  • 56. Chemotherapy:  PCV (Procarbazine, Lomustine, Vincristine) may have a role in stabilising tumour growth  Temozolomide may have a role for progressive astrocytoma  Oligodendroglioma- chemosensitive  Recurrence of anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme
  • 57.  Methylating agent  Principal mechanism is causing damage to DNA of tumour cell, leading to cell death  Taken orally, rapidly absorbed  Penetrates the blood-brain barrier  TMZ 75 mg/m2 PO QD for 6 weeks, then 150- 200 mg/m2 PO QD on Days 1-5 every 28 days for 6 cycles  Used with radiotherapy
  • 58.  No consensus  Low dose temozolomide (+/- procarbazine)  Carboplatin  BCNU/CCNU  Bevacizumab (+/- Irinotecan)  EFGR inhibitors (geftinib)  PDGFR inhibitors (imatinib)  Clinical trials if possible
  • 59.  BCNU(carmustine)- infused wafers  Implanted to tumour bed at time of surgery  Chemotherapy released to surrounding brain tissue over a period of 2 to 3 weeks  Clinical trials showed survival benefit
  • 60.  Prognosis ◦ Extremely young patients<3yrs or patients > 50 y ◦ Large tumours that enhance ◦ Short clinical history ◦ Absent of mental changes ◦ Cerebellar location ◦ High grade ◦ Completeness of surgical lesion ◦ Evidence of progression on imaging studies
  • 61.  Clinical course is by no means benign as is manifested by histology & radiologic appearance  Aggressive early resection advised but NOT on the expense of patient’s quality of life  Diagnosis purely on the basis of radiology has a failure rate of up to 50%  Early histologic evidence of the diagnosis is paramount both for the surgeon & the patient  Chemo-radiotherapy can be delayed until recurrence or progression in low grade gliomas.
  • 63.  Clinical practice guidelines for management of gliomas: Clinical oncological society of Australia; Aug2009.  Malignant Gliomas in Adults;Patrick Y. Wen, Santosh Kesari:N Engl J Med 2008; 359:492- 507  Guidelines on management of low-grade gliomas: report of an EFNS–EANO* Task Force; European Journal of Neurology 2010, 17: 1124–1133
  • 64.  High Grade Gliomas: Pathogenesis, Management And Prognosis;ACNR :VOLUME 12 NUMBER 4 ;SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2012  Practical Guidelines for the Treatment of Malignant Gliomas;Marc C., Patty A., WJM, February 1998-Vol 168, No. 2