The document outlines a process for systematically evaluating materials by first identifying requirements, then analyzing selected materials against those requirements using objective and subjective criteria. Materials are scored on a scale based on how well they match desired features, with the highest-scoring materials that match the most important criteria being selected. The evaluation process aims to match needs with available solutions in a way that saves effort and possible reveals existing materials that fulfill requirements.

1. Materials Evaluation made by group 751

3. Materials development

7. Content

14. Methodology

17. Other Criteria

18. Follow the steps A checklist for materials evaluation Answerthe A questions first to identify your requirements Analyse the materials you have selected by answering the questions B.

19. Compare the A and B findings How? Award the points

20. 0 = does not match the desired features 1 = partly matches the desired features 2 = closely matches the desired features Look for the widest spread of desired features and concentrations in the areas you consider most important

21. Make your choice and use your findings to prepare any documentation needed for defending your decision

22. The evaluation process is best seen as a matching exercise: matching your analyzed needs with available solutions Conclusion The evaluation process should be systematic It can save a lot of duplication of effort by possibly revealing materials that can provide all or part of your materials needs We observed the materials evaluation as one way of exploiting a course design

23. foryour attention!