This document discusses the three major research paradigms in educational research: quantitative research, qualitative research, and mixed research. Quantitative research uses the confirmatory scientific method and collects numerical data to test hypotheses. Qualitative research uses the exploratory scientific method and collects non-numerical data to explore phenomena and generate hypotheses. Mixed research combines quantitative and qualitative methods to provide complex explanations. The document compares key characteristics of each paradigm, such as their views of human behavior, research objectives, and types of data collected.
This document provides an overview of ethnography research. It defines ethnography as describing a group or culture through observation and conversation. The main purposes of ethnography are to obtain a deep understanding of people and their culture in a natural context. Data is typically collected through interviews, observations, and documents in an unstructured way. Ethnography research aims to understand human behavior in everyday contexts rather than experimental conditions. It emphasizes naturalism, understanding, discovery, and challenges assumptions. The document also outlines some advantages and disadvantages of ethnography as well as important ethical considerations around informed consent, privacy, and harm.
This document discusses various methods for conducting content analysis of documents, including both manual and automated techniques. It describes advantages and disadvantages of different approaches such as human coding, dictionary-based methods, and supervised machine learning. Examples of document types, coding units, and content categories are also provided to illustrate how to design and implement a content analysis study.
This presentation slide was prepared by Niroj Dahal for second contact session for M Phil students at Nepal Open University (http://nou.edu.np/), Faculty of Social Science and Education.
This presentation outlines the key aspects of case study research design. It discusses the importance of context, the use of theory for building or testing explanations, and research methodology. Primary and secondary data sources are examined, including interviews, documents, observations and questionnaires. The composition of case studies is explained as focusing on research questions, theoretical propositions, units of analysis, logic and evaluation. Multiple methods and longitudinal data collection can be used. Case studies are useful for exploratory, descriptive and explanatory research aimed at understanding how and why phenomena occur.
This document discusses mixed methods research. It defines mixed methods research as integrating both quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis within a single study. The document outlines the basic characteristics, types of designs, steps, and advantages and disadvantages of mixed methods research. It discusses when mixed methods is appropriate and reasons for using it, such as to explain findings or address questions at different levels. The four main mixed methods designs are explanatory, exploratory, embedded, and triangulation designs.
Quantitative Methods of Research-Intro to research
Once a researcher has written the research question, the next step is to determine the appropriate research methodology necessary to study the question. The three main types of research design methods are qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods.
Quantitative research involves the systematic collection and analysis of data.
Grounded theory methodology is a qualitative research method that aims to generate or discover a theory grounded in data from the field. It is an iterative process where the analyst becomes more grounded in the data and develops richer concepts and models. There are two major schools of grounded theory - the Glaserian school emphasizes emerging theory from neutral questions, while the Straussian school structures questions and coding more rigorously. Key aspects of grounded theory include theoretical sampling, validating findings through quotations, and achieving reliability through techniques like triangulation and audit trails.
This document provides an overview of ethnography research. It defines ethnography as describing a group or culture through observation and conversation. The main purposes of ethnography are to obtain a deep understanding of people and their culture in a natural context. Data is typically collected through interviews, observations, and documents in an unstructured way. Ethnography research aims to understand human behavior in everyday contexts rather than experimental conditions. It emphasizes naturalism, understanding, discovery, and challenges assumptions. The document also outlines some advantages and disadvantages of ethnography as well as important ethical considerations around informed consent, privacy, and harm.
This document discusses various methods for conducting content analysis of documents, including both manual and automated techniques. It describes advantages and disadvantages of different approaches such as human coding, dictionary-based methods, and supervised machine learning. Examples of document types, coding units, and content categories are also provided to illustrate how to design and implement a content analysis study.
This presentation slide was prepared by Niroj Dahal for second contact session for M Phil students at Nepal Open University (http://nou.edu.np/), Faculty of Social Science and Education.
This presentation outlines the key aspects of case study research design. It discusses the importance of context, the use of theory for building or testing explanations, and research methodology. Primary and secondary data sources are examined, including interviews, documents, observations and questionnaires. The composition of case studies is explained as focusing on research questions, theoretical propositions, units of analysis, logic and evaluation. Multiple methods and longitudinal data collection can be used. Case studies are useful for exploratory, descriptive and explanatory research aimed at understanding how and why phenomena occur.
This document discusses mixed methods research. It defines mixed methods research as integrating both quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis within a single study. The document outlines the basic characteristics, types of designs, steps, and advantages and disadvantages of mixed methods research. It discusses when mixed methods is appropriate and reasons for using it, such as to explain findings or address questions at different levels. The four main mixed methods designs are explanatory, exploratory, embedded, and triangulation designs.
Quantitative Methods of Research-Intro to research
Once a researcher has written the research question, the next step is to determine the appropriate research methodology necessary to study the question. The three main types of research design methods are qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods.
Quantitative research involves the systematic collection and analysis of data.
Grounded theory methodology is a qualitative research method that aims to generate or discover a theory grounded in data from the field. It is an iterative process where the analyst becomes more grounded in the data and develops richer concepts and models. There are two major schools of grounded theory - the Glaserian school emphasizes emerging theory from neutral questions, while the Straussian school structures questions and coding more rigorously. Key aspects of grounded theory include theoretical sampling, validating findings through quotations, and achieving reliability through techniques like triangulation and audit trails.
This document provides an overview of qualitative data analysis. It discusses that qualitative data analysis involves coding texts, identifying patterns, and reducing qualitative data into quantitative codes. It also outlines several stages of qualitative analysis including familiarization with data, transcription, organization, coding, identifying themes, recoding, developing categories, exploring relationships between categories, and developing theories. Finally, it discusses challenges of qualitative analysis including placing raw data into logical categories and communicating interpretations to others.
Writing Qualitative Research Reports PowerPointCharita Alston
This document provides guidance on writing qualitative research papers. It discusses that qualitative research is not complete until the report is written, with the researcher analyzing data through reflective steps of writing. The report increases understanding of social phenomena through quotes as evidence for themes. Special challenges include fewer competent referees and journals accepting qualitative papers, which tend to be longer. Sections include introduction, literature review, methods on data collection and analysis, findings using text rather than tables, discussion of limitations and implications, and conclusions. The methods section details the study context and participants, and analytic plan. The results prioritize the story to tell through representative quotations. The discussion links findings to previous research and next steps.
Mixed method research involves using both quantitative and qualitative methods in a single study. There are four basic designs: convergent parallel design, explanatory sequential design, exploratory sequential design, and embedded design. The convergent design collects both types of data simultaneously and merges the results, while the sequential designs implement the methods in phases to build on each other. The embedded design incorporates one method within a study using the other method predominantly. Key decisions in choosing a design are the level of interaction between methods, priority, timing, and mixing strategies.
This document compares and contrasts quantitative and qualitative research. Quantitative research aims to precisely measure and test hypotheses using experimental, quasi-experimental, or non-experimental designs with large sample sizes. The variables are clearly defined, the problem is deductively reasoned, and all aspects are carefully planned. Qualitative research seeks an in-depth understanding of human behavior using small sample sizes in phenomenological, grounded theory, ethnographic, or case study designs. The problem is inductively reasoned and emerges during the study, while variables are loosely defined. It collects rich narrative data through immersion in the subject matter to develop theories rather than test them.
Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods DesignThiyagu K
A Research Design is simply a structural framework of various research methods as well as techniques that are utilized by a researcher. This presentation slides explain the resign design of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method design.
The document discusses different types of research designs used in conducting research studies. It begins by defining research design and its purpose, which is to obtain answers to research questions and minimize variance. The key types of research designs covered are experimental, quasi-experimental, descriptive, and correlational designs. Experimental design aims to test causal relationships through manipulation of independent variables. Descriptive design observes and measures variables without manipulation to understand characteristics and trends. Correlational design examines relationships between non-manipulated variables. The document provides examples and comparisons of when each design is most applicable.
Case study research involves an in-depth examination of a bounded system or multiple systems over time through detailed data collection from multiple sources. It provides an in-depth understanding of a case or comparison of several cases. Case studies can be single instrumental studies exploring a single issue, collective studies exploring an issue through multiple cases, or intrinsic studies analyzing a unique case itself. Data collection involves multiple sources like observations, interviews, documents and artifacts. Data is analyzed through holistic, embedded, thematic, cross-case or within-case analysis to interpret the meaning of the case(s).
This document outlines the scientific method and its key steps. It discusses that scientific investigations are systematic processes aimed at developing general knowledge through empirical evidence and controlled experiments. The main steps of the scientific method include selecting a research topic, reviewing literature, developing hypotheses, determining a research design and data collection methods, collecting and analyzing data, and communicating findings. One challenge discussed is conducting scientific research on human subjects, as human behavior is complex, variable between individuals, and difficult to measure accurately due to psychological and external factors.
This document discusses qualitative research methods for data collection. It describes three main qualitative data collection techniques: participant observation, in-depth interviews, and focus group interviews. Participant observation involves the researcher observing participant behavior and interactions over time to understand their culture and meanings. In-depth interviews allow participants to describe their experiences. Focus groups are interviews with 6-12 participants who discuss their common experiences. The document outlines the steps and considerations for each technique.
This document discusses mixed method research design. It defines mixed methods research as collecting and analyzing both quantitative and qualitative data within a single or series of studies. It outlines the basic characteristics of mixed methods research, including collecting both types of data, considering priority and sequence, and matching analysis to design. The document then discusses various aspects of mixed methods research such as when to conduct it, reasons for using it, types of designs, steps to carry out a mixed methods study, and criteria for evaluating it. It also notes some strengths as being able to describe findings easily but some weaknesses as taking more time.
This document provides an overview of case study research methods. It defines case study research as an in-depth exploration of a bounded system or case over time through detailed data collection from multiple sources. The document outlines the purposes, characteristics, types, advantages, and criticisms of case study research. It also discusses data collection techniques and implications for teaching.
This document discusses quantitative data collection methods in research. It defines a sample as the group studied, population as the overall group, and notes a sample should be representative. It also outlines probability sampling methods like random and stratified sampling and non-probability methods like quota and convenience sampling. Finally, it lists common quantitative data collection techniques like questionnaires, experiments, and online surveys and provides a reference for further information.
A PRESENTATION ON RESEARCH METHODS: SELECTION OF A RESEARCH TOPIC, FORMULATING A HYPOTHESIS, PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES IN RESEARCH, QUANTITATIVE VS QUALITATIVE DEBATE & SELECTION OF A RESEARCH METHOD
This document discusses ontology, which is the philosophical study of the nature of being and existence. It outlines several essential ontological dichotomies, such as universals and particulars, substance and accident, and idealism and materialism. It then defines several ontological concepts, including subject, individual, phenomenon, essence, quality, motion, development, system, structure, whole, part, content, form, cause, and effect. The document also briefly discusses epistemology, the philosophical study of knowledge, outlining its main areas of focus and some methods of cognition.
Historical Research is the systematic and objective evaluation and synthesis of evidence in order to establish facts and draw conclusions about past events.
In the Educational research, two approaches are used. Quantitative & qualitative. Qualitative Research is much different than the quantitative. The details of the qualitative research are discussed in this presentation.
The document discusses various unobtrusive research methods including content analysis, conversation analysis, semiotics, hermeneutics, and discourse analysis. It provides examples of each method including analyzing newspaper crime coverage, interpreting signs and symbols, and understanding historical context. The document also notes potential drawbacks to unobtrusive methods.
Biography
Basic Assumptions
Human Needs
Burden of Freedom
Character Orientations
Personality Disorders
Psychotherapy
Methods of Investigation
Critique of Fromm
Concept of Humanity
Qualitative and quantitative methods of researchJordan Cruz
The document compares and contrasts qualitative and quantitative research methods. It discusses that qualitative research aims to understand social interactions through smaller, non-randomly selected samples, while quantitative research seeks to test hypotheses and make predictions using larger, randomly selected samples and specific variables. It also outlines the different types of data collected, forms of analysis, roles of researchers, and final reporting structures between the two methods.
Quantitative and qualitative research methods differ in important ways. Quantitative research uses statistical analysis of numeric data from standardized instruments, while qualitative research relies on descriptive analysis of text or image data collected from a small number of individuals. The two approaches also differ in how the research problem is identified, how literature is reviewed, how data is collected and analyzed, and how findings are reported. Common quantitative designs include experimental, correlational, and survey designs, while qualitative designs include grounded theory, ethnographic, narrative, and action research designs. The best approach depends on matching the research questions and goals.
Qualitative research aims to understand people's experiences and interpretations of the world. It provides rich, detailed descriptions through methods like interviews, observations, and written responses. The researcher immerses themselves in the topic to understand perspectives without assumptions. Main types include case studies, grounded theory, phenomenology, and ethnography. Data collection involves interactions, written responses, and observations. Analysis begins during data collection to guide further inquiry. The process moves from specific to general understanding through a funnel or inductive approach. Validity is increased through triangulation of multiple data sources, types, and collection methods. Strengths include understanding context, but it is time consuming and results may not generalize. Mixed methods combine qualitative and quantitative approaches at different stages of
This document provides an overview of qualitative data analysis. It discusses that qualitative data analysis involves coding texts, identifying patterns, and reducing qualitative data into quantitative codes. It also outlines several stages of qualitative analysis including familiarization with data, transcription, organization, coding, identifying themes, recoding, developing categories, exploring relationships between categories, and developing theories. Finally, it discusses challenges of qualitative analysis including placing raw data into logical categories and communicating interpretations to others.
Writing Qualitative Research Reports PowerPointCharita Alston
This document provides guidance on writing qualitative research papers. It discusses that qualitative research is not complete until the report is written, with the researcher analyzing data through reflective steps of writing. The report increases understanding of social phenomena through quotes as evidence for themes. Special challenges include fewer competent referees and journals accepting qualitative papers, which tend to be longer. Sections include introduction, literature review, methods on data collection and analysis, findings using text rather than tables, discussion of limitations and implications, and conclusions. The methods section details the study context and participants, and analytic plan. The results prioritize the story to tell through representative quotations. The discussion links findings to previous research and next steps.
Mixed method research involves using both quantitative and qualitative methods in a single study. There are four basic designs: convergent parallel design, explanatory sequential design, exploratory sequential design, and embedded design. The convergent design collects both types of data simultaneously and merges the results, while the sequential designs implement the methods in phases to build on each other. The embedded design incorporates one method within a study using the other method predominantly. Key decisions in choosing a design are the level of interaction between methods, priority, timing, and mixing strategies.
This document compares and contrasts quantitative and qualitative research. Quantitative research aims to precisely measure and test hypotheses using experimental, quasi-experimental, or non-experimental designs with large sample sizes. The variables are clearly defined, the problem is deductively reasoned, and all aspects are carefully planned. Qualitative research seeks an in-depth understanding of human behavior using small sample sizes in phenomenological, grounded theory, ethnographic, or case study designs. The problem is inductively reasoned and emerges during the study, while variables are loosely defined. It collects rich narrative data through immersion in the subject matter to develop theories rather than test them.
Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods DesignThiyagu K
A Research Design is simply a structural framework of various research methods as well as techniques that are utilized by a researcher. This presentation slides explain the resign design of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method design.
The document discusses different types of research designs used in conducting research studies. It begins by defining research design and its purpose, which is to obtain answers to research questions and minimize variance. The key types of research designs covered are experimental, quasi-experimental, descriptive, and correlational designs. Experimental design aims to test causal relationships through manipulation of independent variables. Descriptive design observes and measures variables without manipulation to understand characteristics and trends. Correlational design examines relationships between non-manipulated variables. The document provides examples and comparisons of when each design is most applicable.
Case study research involves an in-depth examination of a bounded system or multiple systems over time through detailed data collection from multiple sources. It provides an in-depth understanding of a case or comparison of several cases. Case studies can be single instrumental studies exploring a single issue, collective studies exploring an issue through multiple cases, or intrinsic studies analyzing a unique case itself. Data collection involves multiple sources like observations, interviews, documents and artifacts. Data is analyzed through holistic, embedded, thematic, cross-case or within-case analysis to interpret the meaning of the case(s).
This document outlines the scientific method and its key steps. It discusses that scientific investigations are systematic processes aimed at developing general knowledge through empirical evidence and controlled experiments. The main steps of the scientific method include selecting a research topic, reviewing literature, developing hypotheses, determining a research design and data collection methods, collecting and analyzing data, and communicating findings. One challenge discussed is conducting scientific research on human subjects, as human behavior is complex, variable between individuals, and difficult to measure accurately due to psychological and external factors.
This document discusses qualitative research methods for data collection. It describes three main qualitative data collection techniques: participant observation, in-depth interviews, and focus group interviews. Participant observation involves the researcher observing participant behavior and interactions over time to understand their culture and meanings. In-depth interviews allow participants to describe their experiences. Focus groups are interviews with 6-12 participants who discuss their common experiences. The document outlines the steps and considerations for each technique.
This document discusses mixed method research design. It defines mixed methods research as collecting and analyzing both quantitative and qualitative data within a single or series of studies. It outlines the basic characteristics of mixed methods research, including collecting both types of data, considering priority and sequence, and matching analysis to design. The document then discusses various aspects of mixed methods research such as when to conduct it, reasons for using it, types of designs, steps to carry out a mixed methods study, and criteria for evaluating it. It also notes some strengths as being able to describe findings easily but some weaknesses as taking more time.
This document provides an overview of case study research methods. It defines case study research as an in-depth exploration of a bounded system or case over time through detailed data collection from multiple sources. The document outlines the purposes, characteristics, types, advantages, and criticisms of case study research. It also discusses data collection techniques and implications for teaching.
This document discusses quantitative data collection methods in research. It defines a sample as the group studied, population as the overall group, and notes a sample should be representative. It also outlines probability sampling methods like random and stratified sampling and non-probability methods like quota and convenience sampling. Finally, it lists common quantitative data collection techniques like questionnaires, experiments, and online surveys and provides a reference for further information.
A PRESENTATION ON RESEARCH METHODS: SELECTION OF A RESEARCH TOPIC, FORMULATING A HYPOTHESIS, PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES IN RESEARCH, QUANTITATIVE VS QUALITATIVE DEBATE & SELECTION OF A RESEARCH METHOD
This document discusses ontology, which is the philosophical study of the nature of being and existence. It outlines several essential ontological dichotomies, such as universals and particulars, substance and accident, and idealism and materialism. It then defines several ontological concepts, including subject, individual, phenomenon, essence, quality, motion, development, system, structure, whole, part, content, form, cause, and effect. The document also briefly discusses epistemology, the philosophical study of knowledge, outlining its main areas of focus and some methods of cognition.
Historical Research is the systematic and objective evaluation and synthesis of evidence in order to establish facts and draw conclusions about past events.
In the Educational research, two approaches are used. Quantitative & qualitative. Qualitative Research is much different than the quantitative. The details of the qualitative research are discussed in this presentation.
The document discusses various unobtrusive research methods including content analysis, conversation analysis, semiotics, hermeneutics, and discourse analysis. It provides examples of each method including analyzing newspaper crime coverage, interpreting signs and symbols, and understanding historical context. The document also notes potential drawbacks to unobtrusive methods.
Biography
Basic Assumptions
Human Needs
Burden of Freedom
Character Orientations
Personality Disorders
Psychotherapy
Methods of Investigation
Critique of Fromm
Concept of Humanity
Qualitative and quantitative methods of researchJordan Cruz
The document compares and contrasts qualitative and quantitative research methods. It discusses that qualitative research aims to understand social interactions through smaller, non-randomly selected samples, while quantitative research seeks to test hypotheses and make predictions using larger, randomly selected samples and specific variables. It also outlines the different types of data collected, forms of analysis, roles of researchers, and final reporting structures between the two methods.
Quantitative and qualitative research methods differ in important ways. Quantitative research uses statistical analysis of numeric data from standardized instruments, while qualitative research relies on descriptive analysis of text or image data collected from a small number of individuals. The two approaches also differ in how the research problem is identified, how literature is reviewed, how data is collected and analyzed, and how findings are reported. Common quantitative designs include experimental, correlational, and survey designs, while qualitative designs include grounded theory, ethnographic, narrative, and action research designs. The best approach depends on matching the research questions and goals.
Qualitative research aims to understand people's experiences and interpretations of the world. It provides rich, detailed descriptions through methods like interviews, observations, and written responses. The researcher immerses themselves in the topic to understand perspectives without assumptions. Main types include case studies, grounded theory, phenomenology, and ethnography. Data collection involves interactions, written responses, and observations. Analysis begins during data collection to guide further inquiry. The process moves from specific to general understanding through a funnel or inductive approach. Validity is increased through triangulation of multiple data sources, types, and collection methods. Strengths include understanding context, but it is time consuming and results may not generalize. Mixed methods combine qualitative and quantitative approaches at different stages of
This document provides an introduction to qualitative and quantitative research techniques for humanitarian needs assessments. It discusses data sources, types of data including quantitative and qualitative information, data collection techniques, and key resources. The main points are:
- Both primary and secondary data from various sources are needed to understand the scale and nature of impact on affected populations.
- Quantitative data provides numeric information on magnitude and scale, while qualitative data helps explain how and why impacts occurred.
- During initial rapid assessments, most data comes from secondary sources due to limited field access, but primary data collection becomes more important over time.
This document outlines the key elements of quantitative research including hypothesis testing, variables, sampling methods, measurement, validity and reliability, statistical analysis, and causal relationships. Quantitative research aims to systematically test hypotheses through precise standardized measurement and statistical analysis of numerical data. Variables are defined, data is collected from samples using standardized tools and procedures, and results are analyzed using statistical techniques to determine relationships between variables and test hypotheses. The goal is to explain phenomena through objective and replicable quantitative analysis.
This document provides an overview of quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. It defines qualitative research as interpretive research conducted in natural settings to understand meanings that people assign to phenomena. Key qualitative methods discussed include interviews, focus groups, observation, and document analysis. The document also outlines characteristics of qualitative research and issues of credibility. Finally, it discusses how specific qualitative methods like ethnography and case studies could be applied to questions related to educational technology and learning outcomes.
This chapter discusses experiments in research. It outlines the seven steps to a well-planned experiment: specifying treatment levels and variables, controlling the environment, choosing an experimental design, selecting and assigning participants, pilot testing and revising, collecting data, and analyzing data. Experiments allow researchers to manipulate independent variables and use control groups to help establish causal relationships between variables. However, they also have disadvantages like artificiality and limited generalizability. The chapter covers threats to internal validity like history, maturation, and regression as well as threats to external validity like reactivity. It provides examples of experiments in product placement and participant assignment.
Presentation delivered by Daisy Abbott, Glasgow School of Art at the Still Game to Learn event organised by College Development Network, 9th December, 2016.
This document discusses quantitative and qualitative research approaches. It outlines the key objectives, features and limitations of each. Quantitative research aims to measure predetermined variables and examine relationships statistically, using methods like surveys and experiments. It focuses on objectivity and generalizability. Qualitative research explores phenomena through flexible, interactive methods like interviews to understand experiences. It provides contextual understanding but findings may not generalize. The document advocates sometimes combining both approaches to overcome individual limitations.
- The researcher analyzed survey data from 200 Muslim government officers regarding their concern for halal products. Officers were grouped by level of management: top, middle, supervisor.
- A chi-square test found no significant relationship between level of management and concern for halal products. The calculated chi-square value of 0.79 was less than the critical value of 9.49, so the null hypothesis that there is no difference was accepted.
- In summary, the level of management (top, middle, supervisor) did not have an effect on officers' reported concern for halal products based on this analysis of the survey data.
The document discusses quantitative and qualitative research methods. It defines both approaches and identifies their distinguishing and similar characteristics across six steps of the research process: identifying a research problem, reviewing literature, specifying a purpose, collecting data, analyzing/interpreting data, and reporting/evaluating. The document also outlines various research design types commonly used in quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods studies.
The document provides guidance on reviewing literature for research. It discusses that literature review helps determine current knowledge on a topic, identifies gaps, and provides a basis for new studies. It recommends reviewing both theoretical and empirical sources within the scope of the research problem. It also outlines the organization of a research article and tips for reading, analyzing, and writing a literature review.
Qualitative research focuses on data that cannot be expressed numerically and aims to develop new concepts through description and interpretation. There are several types of qualitative research including ethnography, grounded theory, and interpretative phenomenological analysis. Data collection methods involve interviews, focus groups, observation, and reviewing documents. Qualitative analysis involves interpreting responses to uncover implied meanings and identify important themes through constant comparison of data. Constant comparison involves open coding, progressive focusing, and summarizing interpretations. Keeping organized records is also important for qualitative analysis.
difference between the qualitative and quantitative researcher, variables, co...laraib asif
This document summarizes the key differences between qualitative and quantitative research methods. Qualitative research aims to understand human behaviors and contexts through inductive analysis like interviews and observations, while quantitative research tests hypotheses through deductive analysis using numerical data and statistics. Some key differences include sample sizes (smaller for qualitative), data collection techniques (open-ended for qualitative vs. standardized for quantitative), and generalizability of findings (qualitative explores specific contexts while quantitative seeks broader application). The document also discusses mixed methods research, which combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to leverage their respective strengths.
This document provides guidance on developing a strong research proposal. It discusses the key components of a proposal, including a problem statement, research questions, definitions, delimitations, literature review, research design, methodology, and bibliography. High-quality proposals keep the research project focused and prevent unnecessary work. The proposal should provide a clear, detailed plan for how the researcher will solve the stated problem. Careful preparation and adherence to requirements are important for approval and successful research.
Sociological research aims to understand society through objective and ethical methods. There are two main types of research: quantitative methods using statistical data, and qualitative methods using interviews and discussions. Sociologists use four approaches: literature reviews, experiments, surveys, and field observations. Literature reviews analyze existing materials while experiments test hypotheses by manipulating variables and measuring outcomes. Surveys ask standardized questions of populations and field observations involve documenting social behaviors.
Experimental and quasi experimental researchNova Isnawati
This document discusses experimental and quasi-experimental research methods. Experimental research methods aim to test the effect of a treatment in uncontrolled conditions and allow strict control of variables. Quasi-experimental designs involve selecting groups to test a variable without random assignment and cannot fully control external factors. Both methods are useful in social sciences where random assignment is difficult. Experimental research advantages include control over external factors, while disadvantages include potential lack of randomization. Quasi-experiments reduce time/resources compared to experiments but cannot account for pre-existing influences as well.
This document discusses quasi-experimental research designs. It defines quasi-experiments as resembling true experiments but lacking full control, such as random assignment. It describes various quasi-experimental designs including one group pre-test post-test, non-equivalent control group, interrupted time series, and time series with non-equivalent controls. Examples are provided of each design along with threats to validity. Common uses of quasi-experiments are discussed as well as advantages such as being able to be conducted in natural settings.
This document provides an overview and introduction to managerial finance. It defines finance and identifies its three main areas as financial markets, financial services, and managerial finance. It also outlines seven key learning goals, such as defining finance and describing the role of the financial manager. The document discusses different business organizations, the relationship between finance, economics, and accounting. It emphasizes that the goal of a firm is to maximize shareholder wealth and examines ideas like EVA and stakeholder theory. The agency problem between managers and owners is also introduced.
05 chap 4 research methodology and design(1)ELIMENG
This chapter discusses the research methodology and design used in the study. It begins by explaining the importance of understanding the philosophical assumptions that underpin research. The research design is described as a descriptive and interpretive case study analyzed through qualitative methods. Data collection methods included questionnaires, participant observation, interviews, and member checking. The chapter then explores the interpretive research paradigm in more detail and discusses how this paradigm frames the study. It provides an overview of the key characteristics of interpretivism, including the nature of reality, knowledge, and the relationship between the researcher and participants.
This chapter discusses the research methodology and design used in the study. It begins by explaining the importance of understanding the philosophical assumptions that underpin research. The interpretive paradigm is identified as the framework for the study. The research design is a descriptive and interpretive case study analyzed through qualitative methods. Data collection methods include questionnaires, participant observation, interviews, and document analysis. The chapter also discusses the research paradigms of positivism, interpretivism, and critical postmodernism and explains that elements of both objectivist and constructivist worldviews are used in the study.
This chapter discusses the research methodology and design used in the study. It begins by explaining the importance of understanding the philosophical assumptions that underpin research. The research design is described as a descriptive and interpretive case study analyzed through qualitative methods. Data collection methods included questionnaires, participant observation, interviews, and member checking. The chapter then explores the interpretive research paradigm in more detail and discusses how this paradigm frames the study. It provides an overview of the key characteristics of interpretivism, including the nature of reality, knowledge, and the relationship between the researcher and participants.
This document provides an overview of qualitative research, outlining some of its key features and philosophical underpinnings. It discusses how qualitative research focuses on understanding people's experiences and interpretations of the world. The document then contrasts qualitative research with quantitative research, noting that qualitative research rejects the positivist model used in natural sciences. It explores some of the philosophical debates around different research paradigms, such as objectivism and interpretivism. Finally, it discusses Thomas Kuhn's work on paradigms and how some researchers believe this helped spur a paradigm shift towards qualitative research in the social sciences.
This document provides an overview of 22 qualitative data analysis methods: Typology, Grounded Theory, Analytic Induction, Logical Analysis, Quasi-Statistics, Narrative Event Analysis, Domain Analysis, Taxonomic Analysis, Thematic Analysis, Metaphorical Analysis, Hermeneutical Analysis, Content Analysis, Conversation Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Semiotic Analysis, Phenomenology, Heuristic Inquiry, Ethnography, Case Study Research, Historical Analysis, Action Research, and Feminist Research. Each method is briefly defined and includes a reference for further information. The document aims to help students, practitioners, and academics with their qualitative research projects.
Here is an in-depth presentation that overviews twenty two (22) qualitative data methods that can be used in marketing research. For more great FREE resources, join us on facebook today at www.facebook.comb2bwhiteboard.
Or visit our website: www.b2bwhiteboard.com
Assessing the quality of qualitative research in entrepreneurshipBabak Zarrin Panah
This document discusses criteria for assessing the quality of qualitative research in three main sections:
1. It outlines traditional scientific research criteria focused on credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability as well as critical realism criteria.
2. It then discusses social construction and constructivist criteria including authenticity criteria focused on fairness, ontological authenticity, educative authenticity, catalytic authenticity and tactical authenticity.
3. Finally, it addresses postmodern criteria for qualitative studies with a subjectivist approach, noting that authenticity is achieved when readers see the researcher has genuinely observed and participated in everyday life through thick descriptions that bring the culture alive.
Research Dilemmas Paradigms, Methods and MethodologyJairo Gomez
The document discusses issues faced by early career researchers, including confusion created by textbooks and articles that present research methodology as either qualitative or quantitative. It argues that discussions should include mixed methods and address the perceived dichotomy. The document then defines and discusses various research paradigms, including positivist/postpositivist, interpretivist/constructivist, transformative, and pragmatic. It explores how paradigms relate to methodology and methods, noting that certain paradigms are commonly associated with either qualitative or quantitative approaches.
The document discusses issues faced by early career researchers regarding research paradigms, methods, and methodology. It argues that while research textbooks and articles often present qualitative and quantitative research as dichotomous, the literature supports mixed methods. The authors review literature on this topic and provide definitions of key terms like paradigm to assist early career researchers in navigating these debates and making informed decisions about their own research.
Lecture definitional terms in research methodsjamesuren
The document discusses key concepts in qualitative research methods for designing a study. It outlines several important considerations for qualitative research design, including using an interpretive framework, collecting data in a natural setting, using multiple sources of data and complex reasoning, developing multiple perspectives, allowing for an emergent design, and providing a reflexive and holistic account. The goal of qualitative research is to learn the meanings that participants hold about the issue being studied from their perspectives.
This document discusses research paradigms in qualitative research. It defines a paradigm as a framework or set of beliefs that guide research. The key paradigms discussed are positivist, constructivist, transformative, and pragmatic. The document explores the basic components of a paradigm including ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology. It examines the characteristics and assumptions of different paradigms such as the positivist view that there is a single observable reality, and the constructivist view that realities are socially constructed. The document also discusses types of paradigms for social theory analysis including functionalist, interpretive, radical humanist, and radical structuralist.
The positivist approach relies on quantitative methods like experiments and statistical analysis to test hypotheses and discover generalizable truths. It assumes an objective reality can be observed and measured. The interpretivist approach uses qualitative methods like interviews and case studies to understand phenomena within their specific contexts. It sees reality as socially constructed and allows for multiple perspectives. Both approaches agree research aims to generate new knowledge but diverge on their methods and philosophical assumptions.
A Review And Evaluation Of Prominent Theories Of WritingLisa Riley
This study reviewed and evaluated three prominent theories of writing: cognitive process theory, social cognitive theory, and sociocultural theory. The researchers applied Dudley-Brown's theory evaluation criteria to assess the theories on several dimensions, including accuracy, consistency, fruitfulness, and sociocultural utility. They found that while each theory provided a unique perspective, the social cognitive theory was the most complete as it incorporated both cognitive processes and social influences on writing. However, more research is still needed on applying these theories to agricultural communications.
Mixedmethods basics: Systematic, integrated mixed methods and textbooks, NVIVOWendy Olsen
I define mixed methods and show that systematic mixed methods can be well organised, with transparent data coding and case-wise data held carefully for hypothesis testing. I list the relevant textbooks. I challenge the schism idea that qualitative methods are intrinsically opposed to what is usually done with quantitative methods. I show how an integrated approach can be begun, giving examples. Suitable to professional researchers, those doing focus groups, and those wanting more background for their qualitative research to come from quantitative data.
This document discusses the research methodology used in a study. It begins by introducing the key components of research methodology: philosophy, strategy, and instruments. It then discusses the two major research philosophies - positivism and interpretivism. The document considers both approaches and rationale for an interpretivist philosophy to understand group adoption of information systems. Both quantitative and qualitative methods are used, including a survey instrument and case studies. The purpose is to have a rigorous yet relevant approach to answering the research question.
This document discusses the differences between theoretical frameworks and conceptual frameworks in research. It begins by providing examples of three students conducting research on street children but approaching it from different disciplinary perspectives of sociology, psychology, and education, and thus having different theoretical/conceptual frameworks.
It then defines key terms like theory, concept, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. It argues that a theoretical framework typically guides deductive research through existing theories and literature, while a conceptual framework may emerge through inductive research to develop a conceptual model from the data. Examples are provided to illustrate the distinction between theoretical and conceptual frameworks.
This document provides an overview of basic concepts in qualitative research. It defines qualitative research as aiming to understand people's experiences and perspectives through in-depth analysis of words and images rather than statistics. Key differences from quantitative research are discussed, such as qualitative research seeking to reveal multiple realities rather than one objective reality. The document also outlines common qualitative research paradigms like interpretivism and types of qualitative studies.
This document discusses the quantitative-qualitative debate regarding mixed methods research. It argues that quantitative and qualitative methods are based on different paradigms with differing views of reality. Specifically, quantitative methods assume an objective reality while qualitative methods see multiple subjective realities. Because of these differing views, the methods do not actually study the same phenomena. The document reviews arguments for combining methods but finds them inadequate as they do not address the underlying paradigmatic differences. It concludes that while methods cannot be combined for validation, they can be used complementarily to gain different perspectives.
Logical issues in Social Scientific Approach of Communication ResearchQingjiang (Q. J.) Yao
This document summarizes key concepts in logic and scientific reasoning as they relate to approaches in social scientific communication research. It discusses the importance of conceptual analysis and explication of concepts. It outlines two approaches of reasoning - deduction and induction - and examples of models that use each. It suggests that social scientific research could benefit from more emphasis on inductive approaches and careful conceptualization to establish validity and reliability.
Similar to Cuantitative,Qualitative and mixed Research (20)
Este documento presenta las normas APA para la presentación de textos académicos. Explica que las normas APA establecen requisitos específicos para el contenido, estilo, citación y referenciación de fuentes. Luego, detalla aspectos formales como el formato, tipo de letra y márgenes requeridos, y ofrece ejemplos de cómo realizar citas textuales, de parafraseo y referencias bibliográficas de acuerdo con las normas APA.
This document outlines the general structure of a research proposal. It lists 12 sections that should be included in a proposal, such as an introduction, problem statement, objectives, methodology, timeline, and budget. It also provides a sample timeline chart and budget table. Additional resources on research proposal elements are provided at the end.
1) Phileas Fogg is an eccentric yet wealthy British man who lives a very rigid daily routine in London. He makes a bet with his fellow members at the Reform Club that he can circumnavigate the world in 80 days.
2) Accompanied by his new French servant Jean Passepartout, Fogg departs London immediately to embark on his journey.
3) A detective named Fix believes Fogg is the culprit who recently robbed the Bank of England. He follows Fogg to Suez in hopes of arresting him once he receives a warrant in Bombay.
The document discusses observation as a research tool for collecting data. It defines observation and describes its importance in the fields of education and research. There are different types of observations, including participant and non-participant observation. Characteristics of good observations include being systematic, focused on relevant details, and recorded in an organized way. Observational variables and advantages like efficiency and flexibility are outlined, as well as potential disadvantages like reactivity. Students are assigned to observe a university setting, record their observations, and present their findings to the class.
Observational research involves watching people in their natural environments and recording their behaviors without interfering. There are two main types of observational research - direct observation, where subjects know they are being watched, and unobtrusive observation, where subjects are unaware. Direct observation can involve continuously monitoring subjects or recording how they allocate their time, while risks include subjects changing their natural behaviors due to awareness. Unobtrusive observation poses ethical issues around informed consent but can provide insights into behaviors not uncovered through other methods like surveys. Researchers must carefully consider guidelines around objectivity, specificity, and ethics when conducting observational research.
Chapter 2 Identifying a Research ProblemJairo Gomez
This chapter discusses identifying a research problem and question. It explains that a research problem is the topic being studied, whether descriptively or experimentally. Good research questions are specific, clear, refer to the problem, note any interventions, and identify participants. The chapter provides examples of research problems and questions and discusses narrowing a topic and developing questions that clarify the research approach.
This survey from the Education Sciences Faculty at the University of the Amazon aims to identify problematic educational situations observed in the classroom. Students are asked to describe issues they've witnessed regarding their peers' learning, behavior, attitudes, technology use, attention, motivation, performance, family relationships, and relationships with teachers. They are also asked to select the most relevant problem worth investigating and explain their choice.
This document summarizes a pedagogical research class that was held on September 25th, 2013. The teacher surprised students with a creative puzzle activity to reinforce concepts about research paradigms, methods, and methodology from a previous reading. Students were organized into groups and had to find their groupmates using puzzle pieces. They then used the completed puzzle to answer a question and discuss their answers with other groups. The activity helped students strengthen their understanding of the subject material in an engaging way. The teacher concluded by providing guidance for upcoming student presentations.
The document defines ethnographic method as a qualitative research design used to explore cultural phenomena. It aims to represent the knowledge and meanings in the lives of a cultural group through field studies or case reports. As a research method, ethnography is used in anthropology, political and social studies, education and other disciplines to study different cultures. Key ethnographic research methods include observation, interviewing cultural subjects, and collecting and analyzing cultural artifacts.
This document discusses naturalistic observation as a research method. Naturalistic observation involves observing behaviors as they occur in natural settings without intervention. It allows researchers to study behaviors that cannot be studied in a lab. Advantages include observing subjects in a natural context, but disadvantages include subjects behaving differently when observed and different interpretations by different observers. Data collection methods for naturalistic observation include tallying behaviors, taking narrative notes, and recording audio/video. Naturalistic observation is useful for generating hypotheses, though bias must be controlled for. Researchers sample behaviors to ensure data represents overall behavior through techniques like time and situation sampling. Grounded theory and case studies are also discussed.
Causal Comparative or (ex-post fact) ResearchJairo Gomez
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
This document discusses correlational studies, which examine relationships between two or more variables without determining cause and effect. Correlational studies can be used to explore predictive relationships or examine how factors relate. The document provides an example of a correlational study that looked for relationships between student grades and their classification as a "morning person" or "evening person". The study found a modest correlation between morningness and grades in early morning classes but not later classes. However, the study did not determine whether being a morning person causes better early grades.
Experimental and quasi experimental methodsJairo Gomez
The experimental method involves systematic observation, measurement, formulation and testing of hypotheses through experimentation. It consists of four stages: observation to collect data, developing hypotheses from the observations, explaining the hypotheses mathematically, and experiments to confirm or refute the hypotheses. The quasi-experimental method is similar but lacks random assignment to conditions and a control group for comparison. It is used in education research when manipulating variables is not possible. Examples include evaluating driver education programs, crime prevention programs, and investigating factors that influence student subject preferences.
This document discusses and compares qualitative and quantitative research methods. It defines qualitative research as objective description of phenomena qualities, while quantitative research collects and analyzes quantitative data. Quantitative methods are based on positivism and determine causal relationships through collected data. Types of quantitative methods include experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-experimental. Qualitative methods are inductive and add experiences, attitudes, and beliefs through description of situations, events, people, interactions, and behaviors. The key differences between qualitative and quantitative methods are that qualitative is subjective and process-oriented while quantitative is objective and result-oriented.
The document discusses the rise of transformative paradigm methods between 1980-1990 based on sociological and psychological theories. It focuses on social justice and marginalized groups. The transformative paradigm uses diverse qualitative and mixed methods to describe contextual and historical factors, especially as they relate to oppression. Example methods mentioned include action research.
Last Wednesday evening, Professor Silvia Lucia Molina Higuera held the second class of Pedagogical Research I with twelve students. The class began with instructions about reflecting on the movie "Sherlock Holmes" and discussing the Pedagogical Portfolio. The movie was then projected but could not be finished due to time constraints. Students were assigned homework to write a one page, single spaced reflective text in either English or Spanish relating the movie to the Pedagogical Research I course, depending on whether their name began with letters A-M or N-Z, respectively.
This document provides an overview and table of contents for the book "Writers at Work: The Paragraph" by Jill Singleton. It introduces the book's purpose of teaching readers how to write effective paragraphs and outlines the book's contents. The book is divided into 9 chapters that cover various paragraph writing topics and walking readers through the writing process. Each chapter also includes exercises and self-checks to help readers practice and improve their paragraph writing skills.
This document provides an overview of sociolinguistics and discusses key concepts from seminal researchers in the field. It summarizes Basil Bernstein's theory of restricted and elaborated codes, explaining how working-class children may be disadvantaged by their habitual use of restricted code. It also summarizes Shirley Brice Heath's research comparing literacy practices and bedtime stories in three American communities, finding that middle-class children were better prepared for school due to experiences that mirrored classroom activities. The document concludes that the work of Bernstein and Heath suggests social class is fundamentally important in education, as schooling privileges certain literacy practices and types of knowledge associated with middle-class communities.
The document outlines tasks for a workshop on pedagogical research methods. Students are instructed to read about research paradigms, methods, and methodologies and answer 11 questions. They are asked to define key terms, list research tools, evaluate the suggested research process, and determine if specific approaches are paradigms, methodologies, or methods. The workshop is for an English language teaching program at the University of the Amazonia on September 17th, 2013.
This document contains the notes and instructions from a university Pedagogical Research I class. It outlines the topics to be covered, including research paradigms, methodologies, methods, and data collection tools. It also includes assignments - students must answer questions about a reading on research dilemmas and paradigms, and prepare oral reports on various research-related topics in assigned groups. Guidelines are provided for the oral reports, which should be no more than 20 minutes and include an activity to check understanding. The presentations will be evaluated on several criteria such as fluency, clarity, and inclusion of an activity.
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AIVladimir Iglovikov, Ph.D.
Presented by Vladimir Iglovikov:
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglovikov/
- https://x.com/viglovikov
- https://www.instagram.com/ternaus/
This presentation delves into the journey of Albumentations.ai, a highly successful open-source library for data augmentation.
Created out of a necessity for superior performance in Kaggle competitions, Albumentations has grown to become a widely used tool among data scientists and machine learning practitioners.
This case study covers various aspects, including:
People: The contributors and community that have supported Albumentations.
Metrics: The success indicators such as downloads, daily active users, GitHub stars, and financial contributions.
Challenges: The hurdles in monetizing open-source projects and measuring user engagement.
Development Practices: Best practices for creating, maintaining, and scaling open-source libraries, including code hygiene, CI/CD, and fast iteration.
Community Building: Strategies for making adoption easy, iterating quickly, and fostering a vibrant, engaged community.
Marketing: Both online and offline marketing tactics, focusing on real, impactful interactions and collaborations.
Mental Health: Maintaining balance and not feeling pressured by user demands.
Key insights include the importance of automation, making the adoption process seamless, and leveraging offline interactions for marketing. The presentation also emphasizes the need for continuous small improvements and building a friendly, inclusive community that contributes to the project's growth.
Vladimir Iglovikov brings his extensive experience as a Kaggle Grandmaster, ex-Staff ML Engineer at Lyft, sharing valuable lessons and practical advice for anyone looking to enhance the adoption of their open-source projects.
Explore more about Albumentations and join the community at:
GitHub: https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations
Website: https://albumentations.ai/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/100504475
Twitter: https://x.com/albumentations
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMESafe Software
In this second installment of our Essentials of Automations webinar series, we’ll explore the landscape of triggers and actions, guiding you through the nuances of authoring and adapting workspaces for seamless automations. Gain an understanding of the full spectrum of triggers and actions available in FME, empowering you to enhance your workspaces for efficient automation.
We’ll kick things off by showcasing the most commonly used event-based triggers, introducing you to various automation workflows like manual triggers, schedules, directory watchers, and more. Plus, see how these elements play out in real scenarios.
Whether you’re tweaking your current setup or building from the ground up, this session will arm you with the tools and insights needed to transform your FME usage into a powerhouse of productivity. Join us to discover effective strategies that simplify complex processes, enhancing your productivity and transforming your data management practices with FME. Let’s turn complexity into clarity and make your workspaces work wonders!
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technologies, XML continues to play a vital role in structuring, storing, and transporting data across diverse systems. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present new methodologies for enhancing XML development workflows, introducing efficiency, automation, and intelligent capabilities. This presentation will outline the scope and perspective of utilizing AI in XML development. The potential benefits and the possible pitfalls will be highlighted, providing a balanced view of the subject.
We will explore the capabilities of AI in understanding XML markup languages and autonomously creating structured XML content. Additionally, we will examine the capacity of AI to enrich plain text with appropriate XML markup. Practical examples and methodological guidelines will be provided to elucidate how AI can be effectively prompted to interpret and generate accurate XML markup.
Further emphasis will be placed on the role of AI in developing XSLT, or schemas such as XSD and Schematron. We will address the techniques and strategies adopted to create prompts for generating code, explaining code, or refactoring the code, and the results achieved.
The discussion will extend to how AI can be used to transform XML content. In particular, the focus will be on the use of AI XPath extension functions in XSLT, Schematron, Schematron Quick Fixes, or for XML content refactoring.
The presentation aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of AI usage in XML development, providing attendees with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions. Whether you’re at the early stages of adopting AI or considering integrating it in advanced XML development, this presentation will cover all levels of expertise.
By highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of integrating AI with XML development tools and languages, the presentation seeks to inspire thoughtful conversation around the future of XML development. We’ll not only delve into the technical aspects of AI-powered XML development but also discuss practical implications and possible future directions.
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxdanishmna97
Pakdata Cf is a groundbreaking system designed to streamline and facilitate access to CNIC information. This innovative platform leverages advanced technology to provide users with efficient and secure access to their CNIC details.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 6. In this session, we will cover Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI webinar offers an in-depth exploration of leveraging cutting-edge technologies for test automation within the UiPath platform. Attendees will delve into the integration of generative AI, a test automation solution, with Open AI advanced natural language processing capabilities.
Throughout the session, participants will discover how this synergy empowers testers to automate repetitive tasks, enhance testing accuracy, and expedite the software testing life cycle. Topics covered include the seamless integration process, practical use cases, and the benefits of harnessing AI-driven automation for UiPath testing initiatives. By attending this webinar, testers, and automation professionals can gain valuable insights into harnessing the power of AI to optimize their test automation workflows within the UiPath ecosystem, ultimately driving efficiency and quality in software development processes.
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into integrating generative AI.
2. Understanding how this integration enhances test automation within the UiPath platform
3. Practical demonstrations
4. Exploration of real-world use cases illustrating the benefits of AI-driven test automation for UiPath
Topics covered:
What is generative AI
Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath integration with generative AI
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Introducing Milvus Lite: Easy-to-Install, Easy-to-Use vector database for you...Zilliz
Join us to introduce Milvus Lite, a vector database that can run on notebooks and laptops, share the same API with Milvus, and integrate with every popular GenAI framework. This webinar is perfect for developers seeking easy-to-use, well-integrated vector databases for their GenAI apps.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 5. In this session, we will cover CI/CD with devops.
Topics covered:
CI/CD with in UiPath
End-to-end overview of CI/CD pipeline with Azure devops
Speaker:
Lyndsey Byblow, Test Suite Sales Engineer @ UiPath, Inc.
In his public lecture, Christian Timmerer provides insights into the fascinating history of video streaming, starting from its humble beginnings before YouTube to the groundbreaking technologies that now dominate platforms like Netflix and ORF ON. Timmerer also presents provocative contributions of his own that have significantly influenced the industry. He concludes by looking at future challenges and invites the audience to join in a discussion.
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...SOFTTECHHUB
The choice of an operating system plays a pivotal role in shaping our computing experience. For decades, Microsoft's Windows has dominated the market, offering a familiar and widely adopted platform for personal and professional use. However, as technological advancements continue to push the boundaries of innovation, alternative operating systems have emerged, challenging the status quo and offering users a fresh perspective on computing.
One such alternative that has garnered significant attention and acclaim is Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, a sleek, powerful, and user-friendly Linux distribution that promises to redefine the way we interact with our devices. With its focus on performance, security, and customization, Nitrux Linux presents a compelling case for those seeking to break free from the constraints of proprietary software and embrace the freedom and flexibility of open-source computing.
“An Outlook of the Ongoing and Future Relationship between Blockchain Technologies and Process-aware Information Systems.” Invited talk at the joint workshop on Blockchain for Information Systems (BC4IS) and Blockchain for Trusted Data Sharing (B4TDS), co-located with with the 36th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), 3 June 2024, Limassol, Cyprus.
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalizationZilliz
Mike Del Balso, CEO & Co-Founder at Tecton, presents "Full RAG," a novel approach to AI recommendation systems, aiming to push beyond the limitations of traditional models through a deep integration of contextual insights and real-time data, leveraging the Retrieval-Augmented Generation architecture. This talk will outline Full RAG's potential to significantly enhance personalization, address engineering challenges such as data management and model training, and introduce data enrichment with reranking as a key solution. Attendees will gain crucial insights into the importance of hyperpersonalization in AI, the capabilities of Full RAG for advanced personalization, and strategies for managing complex data integrations for deploying cutting-edge AI solutions.
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysKari Kakkonen
My slides at Nordic Testing Days 6.6.2024
Climate impact / sustainability of software testing discussed on the talk. ICT and testing must carry their part of global responsibility to help with the climat warming. We can minimize the carbon footprint but we can also have a carbon handprint, a positive impact on the climate. Quality characteristics can be added with sustainability, and then measured continuously. Test environments can be used less, and in smaller scale and on demand. Test techniques can be used in optimizing or minimizing number of tests. Test automation can be used to speed up testing.
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slackshyamraj55
Discover the seamless integration of RPA (Robotic Process Automation), COMPOSER, and APM with AWS IDP enhanced with Slack notifications. Explore how these technologies converge to streamline workflows, optimize performance, and ensure secure access, all while leveraging the power of AWS IDP and real-time communication via Slack notifications.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdfMalak Abu Hammad
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
Dr. Sean Tan, Head of Data Science, Changi Airport Group
Discover how Changi Airport Group (CAG) leverages graph technologies and generative AI to revolutionize their search capabilities. This session delves into the unique search needs of CAG’s diverse passengers and customers, showcasing how graph data structures enhance the accuracy and relevance of AI-generated search results, mitigating the risk of “hallucinations” and improving the overall customer journey.
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionAggregage
Join Maher Hanafi, VP of Engineering at Betterworks, in this new session where he'll share a practical framework to transform Gen AI prototypes into impactful products! He'll delve into the complexities of data collection and management, model selection and optimization, and ensuring security, scalability, and responsible use.
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Cuantitative,Qualitative and mixed Research
1. 29
Chapter 2
Quantitative,Qualitative,
and Mixed Research
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
To be able to
Describe the characteristics of quantitative research.
List and explain the different types of variables used in quantitative research.
Explain the difference between experimental and nonexperimental quantitative research.
Explain the concept of a correlation coefficient.
Describe the characteristics of qualitative research.
List and explain the differences among the different types of qualitative research introduced
in this chapter.
Describe the characteristics of mixed research.
Explain when each of the three major research paradigms (quantitative,
qualitative,and mixed) would be appropriate to use.
Visit the study site for an
interactive concept map.
2. 30
This chapter is about the three major research paradigms in educational
research. Each of these paradigms tends to bring a slightly different view
or perspective to what we study. It seems appropriate to start this chapter
with an age-old poem (written by the Persian poet/philosopher Rumi)
that tells us that different perspectives can all have truth value and that,
when we put those perspectives together, we can come away with a fuller
picture of what we are studying. We use the poem to support our view
of the importance of using all three major research paradigms in
educational research.
Elephant in the Dark
Some Hindus have an elephant to show.
No one here has ever seen an elephant.
They bring it at night to a dark room.
One by one, we go in the dark and come out
saying how we experience the animal.
One of us happens to touch the trunk.
“A water-pipe kind of creature.”
Another, the ear. “A very strong, always moving
back and forth, fan-animal.”
Another, the leg. “I find it still,
like a column on a temple.”
Another touches the curved back.
“A leathery throne.”
Another, the cleverest, feels the tusk.
“A rounded sword made of porcelain.”
He’s proud of his description.
Each of us touches one place
and understands the whole in that way.
The palm and the fingers feeling in the dark are
how the senses explore the reality of the elephant.
If each of us held a candle there,
and if we went in together,
we could see it.
Source: From Jelaluddin Rumi, The Essential Rumi, trans. & ed. by Coleman Barks, 1995, San Francisco CA: Castle Books, 1995. p. 252.
Coleman Barks.
RESEARCH IN REAL LIFE Paradigms and Perspectives
3. Aresearch paradigm is a perspective about research held by a community of
researchers that is based on a set of shared assumptions, concepts, values, and prac-
tices.Moresimply,itisanapproachtothinkingaboutanddoingresearch.Inthischapter
we introduce you to the three major educational research paradigms or approaches: quantita-
tive research, qualitative research, and mixed research. Mixed research also is commonly called
mixedmethodsresearch,butweusethesimplertermmixedresearch.Notonlyisthelabelmixed
researchsimplerthanthelabelmixedmethodsresearch,butitalsoismoreaccuratebecausethe
quantitative,qualitative,and mixed research debates are about much more than just methods.
Quantitativeresearchwasthegenerallyacceptedresearchparadigmineducationalresearchuntil
the early 1980s, when the “paradigm wars” between advocates of quantitative and qualitative
researchreacheda new peak (Guba,1990;Tashakkori& Teddlie,1998).During the 1980s,many
quantitative and qualitative researchers argued that their approach was superior.Some of these
researchers were“purists,”in the sense that they argued that the two approaches could not be
used together because of differences in the worldviews or philosophies associated with the two
approaches.
Thiseither-orposition(i.e.,onemustusequantitativeorqualitativeresearchbutnotboth)
is called the incompatibility thesis. The problem with the incompatibility thesis is its failure
to recognize that creative and thoughtful mixing of assumptions, ideas, and methods can be
veryhelpfulandoffersathirdparadigm.Themixingof ideasandapproacheshasbeenpresent
throughout history because mixing or combining builds upon what we know and offers new
ways to understand and study our world.In short,in addition to quantitative and quantitative
research,mixed research offers an exciting way of conducting educational research.
Exhibit 2.1 shows one of the leading figures in the paradigm dialogue that had become a
worldwide phenomenon by the 1990s and continues to play an important part in educational
research today.
Chapter 2: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research 31
Research
paradigm
A perspective held
by a community of
researchers that is
based on a set of
shared
assumptions,
concepts, values,
and practices
Incompatibility
thesis
The proposition
that one cannot
mix quantitative
and qualitative
research
During the 1970s, 1980s, and early 1990s, Egon Guba helped initiate the “paradigm
dialogue” between quantitative research and the “new” research paradigm of qualita-
tive research. Guba emphasized that research paradigms are characterized by their
distinctive ontology—“What is the nature of the knowable? Or what is the nature
of reality?”; epistemology—“What is the relationship between the knower (the inquirer)
and the known (or knowable)?” or What is the paradigm’s theory of knowledge; and
methodology—“How should the inquirer go about finding out knowledge?” or, more
specifically, What methods should be used in research? (quotes are from Guba, 1990).
Later, two more dimensions of paradigms were added: axiology—What is the role of val-
ues in the inquiry process? and rhetoric—What kind of language and communication
should be used in research? The differences between quantitative, qualitative, and mixed
research on these and additional dimensions are found in Table 2.1 and in the section
“Characteristics of the Three Research Paradigms.” Guba was author of many important books, chapters, and arti-
cles on qualitative research and evaluation (e.g., Guba; Guba & Lincoln, 1989, 1992; Lincoln & Guba, 1985).
(Continued)
EXHIBIT 2.1 Egon G. Guba (1924–2008)
4. 32 PA R T I: IN T RO D U C TI O N
Pragmatism
Philosophical
position that what
works is what is
important or “valid”
FIGURE 2.1 The research
continuum
Qualitative
Research
Mixed
Research
Quantitative
Research
(Continued)
Exhibit definitions:
• Ontology—the branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of reality and truth
• Epistemology—the branch of philosophy dealing with knowledge and its justification
• Methodology—the identification, study, and justification of research methods
• Axiology—the branch of philosophy dealing with values and ethics
• Rhetoric—the art or science of language and oral and written communication
Starting in the 1990s, many researchers rejected the incompatibility thesis and started
advocating the pragmatic position that says that both quantitative and qualitative research
are very important and often should be thoughtfully mixed in single research studies.
According to pragmatism,what is ultimately important is what works in practice and what
promotes social justice.Pragmatism is focused on the ends that we desire.According to prag-
matism, your research design should be planned and conducted based on what will best help
you answer your research questions;the result is pragmatic knowledge. Pragmatism says that
theoriesorprogramsoractionsthataredemonstratedtoworkforparticulargroupsof people
aretheonesthatweshouldviewascurrentlybeingthemostvalidforthosepeople.Wespecif-
icallycallourversionof pragmatism“dialecticalpragmatism”becauseaphilosophyformixed
research should carefully listen to ideas, assumptions, and approaches found in qualitative
and quantitative research and in any other relevant domain (e.g.,perspectives found in dif-
ferentacademicdisciplines,viewpointsof differentstakeholderandsocialgroups).Theword
dialectical is intended to imply a dynamic back-and-forth listening to multiple perspectives.
Although mixed research is still the “new kid on the block,” the list of researchers identify-
ing with this approach is increasing rapidly.
You can see in Figure 2.1 that the three major research approaches can be viewed as
falling on a research continuum with qualitative research on the left side, quantitative
research on the right side,and mixed research in the center of the continuum.In other words,
research can be fully qualitative or mixed with an emphasis on qualitative, fully quantita-
tive or mixed with an emphasis on quantitative, or mixed with an equal emphasis on qual-
itative and quantitative.A particular research study would fall at a particular point on the
continuum.
Wenowcomparethecharacteristicsortenetsof thethreeresearchparadigmsintheirpure
forms. Later in the chapter, we introduce you to some ideas and terminology associated with
each of the research paradigms.
5. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE
THREE RESEARCH PARADIGMS
Pure quantitative research relies on the collection of quantitative data (i.e., numerical data)
and follows the other characteristics of the quantitative research paradigm shown in Table 2.1.
Pure qualitative research relies on the collection of qualitative data (i.e., nonnumerical data
suchaswordsandpictures)andfollowstheothercharacteristicsof thequalitativeresearchpar-
adigm shown in Table 2.1.Mixed research involves the mixing of quantitative and qualitative
researchmethods,approaches,orotherparadigmcharacteristics.Theexactmixturethatiscon-
sideredappropriatewilldependontheresearchquestionsandthesituationalandpracticalissues
facing a researcher.All three research paradigms are important as we attempt to solve the man-
ifold and complex problems facing us in the field of education.Take a moment now to examine
Table 2.1 and then read the following discussion of the key differences among the three
approaches.
First, the quantitative research approach primarily follows the confirmatory scientific
method (discussed in Chapter 1) because its focus is on hypothesis testing and theory testing.
Quantitative researchers consider it to be of primary importance to state one’s hypotheses and
then test those hypotheses with empirical data to see if they are supported.On the other hand,
qualitative research primarily follows the exploratory scientific method (also discussed in
Chapter1).Qualitativeresearchisusedtodescribewhatisseenlocallyandsometimestocome
up with or generate new hypotheses and theories. Qualitative research is used when little is
known about a topic or phenomenon and when one wants to discover or learn more about it.
It is commonly used to understand people’s experiences and to express their perspectives.
Researchersadvocatingmixedresearcharguethatthatitisimportanttouseboththeexploratory
and the confirmatory methods in one’s research (Johnson & Onwuegbuzie,2004).
Most researchers use inductive and deductive reasoning when they conduct research.For
example, they use inductive reasoning when they search for patterns in their particular data,
whentheymakegeneralizations(e.g.,fromsamplestopopulations),andwhentheymakeinfer-
ences as to the best explanation.Ultimately,the logic of confirmation is inductive because we
do not get conclusive proof from empirical research (see principle of evidence in Chapter 1).
Researchers use deductive reasoning when they deduce from their hypotheses the observable
consequencesthatshouldoccurwithnewempiricaldataiftheirhypothesesaretrue.Researchers
also use deductive reasoning if they conclude that a theory is false. If they draw this conclu-
sion, they will then move on to generate and test new ideas and new theories.
Quantitative and qualitative research are also distinguished by different views of human
behavior. In quantitative research, it is assumed that cognition and behavior are highly pre-
dictable and explainable.Traditionally,the assumption of determinism,which means that all
eventsarefullydeterminedbyoneormorecauses,wasmadeinquantitativeresearch(Salmon,
2007).For example,the process by which children learn to read is determined by one or more
causes.Becausequantitativeresearchhasnotidentifiedanyuniversalorunerringlawsof human
behavior, most contemporary quantitative researchers search for probabilistic causes
(Humphreys, 1989). A probabilistic statement might go like this: “Adolescents who become
involved with drugs and alcohol are more likely to drop out of high school than are adolescents
who do not become involved with drugs and alcohol.” The point is that most quantitative
researcherstrytoidentifycause-and-effectrelationshipsthatenablethemtomakeprobabilistic
predictions and generalizations.
Chapter 2: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research 33
Quantitative
research
Research that relies
primarily on the
collection of
quantitative data
Mixed research
Research that
involves the mixing
of quantitative and
qualitative methods
or other paradigm
characteristics
Determinism
All events have
causes.
Probabilistic
causes
Causes that usually
produce an
outcome
Qualitative
research
Research that relies
primarily on the
collection of
qualitative data
6. 34 PA R T I: IN T RO D U C TI O N
TABLE 2.1 Emphases of Quantitative, Mixed, and Qualitative Research
Quantitative Research Mixed Research Qualitative Research
Scientific method Confirmatory or
“top-down”
The researcher tests
hypotheses and theory
with data.
Confirmatory and exploratory Exploratory or“bottom-up”
The researcher generates or
constructs knowledge,hypotheses,
and grounded theory from data
collected during fieldwork.
Ontology (i.e.,nature of
reality/truth)
Objective,material,
structural,agreed-upon
Pluralism; appreciation of objective,subjective,
and intersubjective reality and their
interrelations
Subjective,mental,personal,and
constructed
Epistemology (i.e.,
theory of knowledge)
Scientific realism; search
for Truth; justification by
empirical confirmation of
hypotheses; universal
scientific standards
Dialectical pragmatism; pragmatic
justification (what works for whom in specific
contexts); mixture of universal (e.g.,always be
ethical) and community-specific needs-based
standards
Relativism; individual and group
justification; varying standards
View of human thought
and behavior
Regular and predictable Dynamic,complex,and partially predictable
Multiple influences include
environment/nurture,biology/nature,
freewill/agency,and chance/fortuity.
Situational,social,contextual,
personal,and unpredictable
Most common research
objectives
Quantitative/numerical
description,causal
explanation,and prediction
Multiple objectives; provide complex and fuller
explanation and understanding; understand
multiple perspectives
Qualitative/subjective description,
empathetic understanding,and
exploration
Interest Identify general scientific
laws; inform national
policy.
Connect theory and practice; understand
multiple causation,nomothetic (i.e.,general)
causation,and idiographic (i.e.,particular,
individual) causation; connect national and
local interests and policy.
Understand and appreciate
particular groups and individuals;
inform local policy.
“Focus” Narrow-angle lens,testing
specific hypotheses
Multilens focus Wide-angle and“deep-angle”lens,
examining the breadth and depth of
phenomena to learn more about
them
Nature of observation Study behavior under
controlled conditions;
isolate the causal effect of
single variables.
Study multiple contexts,perspectives,or
conditions; study multiple factors as they
operate together.
Study groups and individuals in
natural settings; attempt to
understand insiders’ views,
meanings,and perspectives.
Form of data collected Collect quantitative data
based on precise
measurement using
structured and validated
data-collection
instruments.
Collect multiple kinds of data. Collect qualitative data such as in-
depth interviews,participant
observation,field notes,and open-
ended questions.The researcher is
the primary data-collection
instrument.
Nature of data Variables Mixture of variables,words,categories,and
images
Words,images,categories
Data analysis Identify statistical
relationships among
variables.
Quantitative and qualitative analysis used
separately and in combination.
Use descriptive data; search for
patterns,themes,and holistic
features; and appreciate
difference/variation.
7. On the other hand, qualitative researchers often view human behavior as being fluid,
dynamic,and changing over time and place,and they usually are not interested in generalizing
beyond the particular people who are studied.In qualitative research,different groups are said
toconstructtheirdifferentrealitiesorperspectives,andthesesocialconstructions,reciprocally,
influence how they“see”or understand their worlds, what they see as normal and abnormal,
and how they should act.
Mixed researchers see positive value in both the quantitative and the qualitative views of
human behavior. They view the use of only quantitative research or only qualitative research
as limiting and incomplete for many research problems.As can be seen by examining the mid-
dle column in Table 2.1, mixed researchers use a combination of quantitative and qualitative
concepts and approaches to understand the world more fully.
Quantitative research often uses what might be called a“narrow-angle lens”because the
focus is on only one or a few causal factors at the same time.Quantitative researchers attempt
to hold constant the factors that are not being studied.This is often accomplished under labo-
ratory conditions in which an experimenter randomly assigns participants to groups,manip-
ulates only one factor, and then examines the outcome. For example, a researcher might first
randomlyassignresearchvolunteerstotwogroups.Randomassignmentmakesthetwogroups
verysimilar.Thentheresearchermightexposeonegrouptoanewteachingmethodandanother
grouptoadifferentteachingmethod,treatingthetwogroupssimilarlyduringthestudyexcept
for the research-manipulated difference in teaching method. The researcher then examines
which group learns the most and attributes the difference in learning to the teaching method
received.The researcher is able to make a causal attribution because the two groups were sim-
ilaratthestartof theexperimentandtheonlyfactortheydifferedonwaswhichteachingmethod
they received.
Qualitativeresearchusesawide-anddeep-anglelens,examininghumanchoiceandbehav-
ior as it occurs naturally in all of its detail.Qualitative researchers do not want to intervene in
the natural flow of behavior.Qualitative researchers study behavior naturalistically and holis-
tically. They try to understand multiple dimensions and layers of reality, such as the types of
people in a group, how they think, how they interact, what kinds of agreements or norms are
present,andhowthesedimensionscometogetherholisticallytodescribethegroup.Forexample,
perhaps a qualitative researcher wants to study the social climate and culture of a highly suc-
cessful school.The researcher would spend a great deal of time studying the many aspects of
the school to come up with an analysis of how the school operates and for whom and why it is
successful.Dependingontheresearchquestions,aresearcherusingthemixedapproachwould
Chapter 2: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research 35
Results Generalizable findings
providing representation of
objective outsider
viewpoint of populations
Provision of “subjective insider”and“objective
outsider”viewpoints; presentation and
integration of multiple dimensions and
perspectives
Particularistic findings; provision of
insider viewpoints
Form of final report Formal statistical report
(e.g.,with correlations,
comparisons of means,and
reporting of statistical
significance of findings)
Mixture of numbers and narrative Informal narrative report with
contextual description and direct
quotations from research
participants
8. spend part of his or her time in each of the different focus modes, moving back and forth
between wide-angle,narrow-angle,and deep-angle viewpoints.
Quantitative researchers attempt to operate under the assumption of objectivity. They
assume that there is a reality to be observed and that rational observers who look at the same
phenomenon will basically agree on its existence and its characteristics.They try to remain as
neutral or value-free as they can,and they attempt to avoid human bias whenever possible.In
a sense,quantitative researchers attempt to study the phenomena that are of interest to them
“fromadistance.”Forexample,standardizedquestionnairesandotherquantitativemeasuring
tools are often used to measure carefully what is observed. In experiments, researchers fre-
quentlyuserandomassignmenttoplaceparticipantsintodifferentgroupstoeliminatethepos-
sibility of human bias while constructing the comparison groups.In judging results,statistical
criteria are used to form many conclusions.
Qualitative researchers generally contend that“reality is socially constructed”(e.g.,Guba
& Lincoln, 1989).For example, social behavior follows socially constructed norms.Language
also has an important influence on our views of the world.For example,it has been suggested
thattheInuit“see”manytypesof snow,whereastheaverageAmericanprobablyonlyseesafew
types.Inuits’local languages might allow them to see distinctions that you do not notice; this
idea is known as the linguistic-relativity hypothesis.
Qualitative researchers argue that it is important to “get close” to their objects of study
through participant observation so that they can experience for themselves the subjective
dimensions of the phenomena they study. In qualitative research, the researcher is said to be
the“instrument of data collection.”Rather than using a standardized instrument or measur-
ing device, the qualitative researcher asks the questions, collects the data, makes interpreta-
tions, and records what is observed.The qualitative researcher constantly tries to understand
the people he or she is observing from the participants’ or “natives’” or “actors’” viewpoints.
This is the concept of“empathetic understanding.”The famous sociologist MaxWeber,writing
in the early 20th century,called this idea of understanding something from the other person’s
viewpoint verstehen (Weber,1968).This is expressed in anAmerican idiom as“putting your-
self into someone else’s shoes.”It is important to remember that qualitative research is focused
onunderstandingthe“insider’sperspective”of peopleandtheirculturesandthisrequiresdirect
personal and often participatory contact.
Accordingtomixedresearch,itisimportanttounderstandboththesubjective(individual),
intersubjective(language-based,discursive,cultural),and objective(materialandcausal)real-
ities in our world.Although it is important not to influence or bias what you are observing,it
alsoisimportanttounderstandtheinsiders’meaningsandviewpoints.Forexample,if youwere
studyingthecultureof thesnake-handlingchurchesintheareawhereAlabama,Tennessee,and
Georgia come together, it might be helpful to collect quantitative data by having the church
membersfilloutstandardizedinstrumentsmeasuringtheirpersonalityanddemographicchar-
acteristics.Itwouldalsobeessentialtocollectqualitativedatathroughin-depthpersonalinter-
viewsandcloseobservationsof thememberstogainabetterunderstanding(fromtheinsiders’
perspectives) of the snake-handling culture.In short,the mixing of methods would add very
useful and complementary information.
Quantitative research generally reduces measurement to numbers.In survey research,for
example, attitudes are usually measured by using rating scales. The following 5-point agree-
ment scale is an example:
36 PA R T I: IN T RO D U C TI O N
Linguistic-
relativity
hypothesis
The idea that
people see and
understand the
world through the
lens of their local
language. People’s
thoughts are bound
by their language.
Verstehen
Method of
empathetic
understanding of
others’ viewpoints,
meanings,
intentions, and
cultural beliefs
9. Strongly Strongly
Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree
1 2 3 4 5
Theinterviewerorquestionnaireprovidesastatement,andtherespondentsreplywithone
of thefiveallowableresponsecategories.Afterallrespondentshaveprovidedtheiranswers,the
researcher typically calculates and reports an average for the group of respondents.Let us say,
for example,that a researcher asks a group of teachers for their degree of agreement with the
following statement:“Teachers need more training in the area of child psychopathology.”The
researcher might then calculate the average response for the whole group,which might be 4.15
basedona5-pointscale.Theresearchermightalsodeterminewhethertheratingsvarybyyears
of teaching experience.Perhaps the average agreement for new teachers is 4.5,and the average
for teachers with 5 or more years of experience is 3.9.As you might guess,quantitative data are
usually analyzed by using statistical analysis programs on a computer.
On the other hand, qualitative researchers do not usually collect data in the form of
numbers.Rather,they conduct observations and in-depth interviews,and the data are usually
in the form of words. For example, a qualitative researcher might conduct a focus group dis-
cussion with six or seven new teachers to discuss the adequacy of their undergraduate educa-
tional programs in preparing them to deal with real-world problems that they face in schools.
The facilitator of the focus group would probably videotape the group and tape-record what
was said.Later,the recording would be transcribed into words,which would then be analyzed
by using the techniques of qualitative data analysis (see Chapter 19).Also,when a qualitative
researcher enters the field and makes observations,the researcher will write down what he or
shesees,aswellasrelevantinsightsandthoughts.Thedataareagainintheformof words.During
qualitative data analysis,the researcher will try to identify categories that describe what hap-
pened, as well as general themes appearing again and again in the data. The mixed research
approach would use a variety of data collection and analysis approaches.
Finally, qualitative, mixed, and quantitative research reports tend to differ. Quantitative
reports are commonly reported in journal articles ranging from 5 to 15 pages. The reports
include many numbers and results of statistical significance testing (to be explained later).In
contrast,qualitativeresearchreportsaregenerallylonger,andtheyarewritteninnarrativeform,
describing what was found,especially from the insider perspectives of the people in the group
being studied.This report is more interpretative,as the researcher attempts to understand and
portray the lives and experiences and language of the research participants.Qualitative jour-
nal articles are frequently 20–25 pages long, and the results of qualitative research are often
published in the form of books or monographs rather than journal articles. Mixed research
might follow the quantitative style or the qualitative style or,more frequently,might use a mix-
ture of the styles.
Chapter 2: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research 37
2.1 What are the key features of quantitative and qualitative research?
2.2 What are the key features of mixed methods research?
R E V I E W
Q U E S T I O N S
10. QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS:
EXPERIMENTAL AND NONEXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
You now know some of the characteristics of quantitative,qualitative,and mixed research.We
next introduce some of the different methods of quantitative research. Before we do that,
however,you need to know about variables,because quantitative researchers usually describe
the world by using variables and they attempt to explain and predict aspects of the world by
demonstratingtherelationshipsamong variables.Youcan see asummaryof thetypesof vari-
ables in Table 2.2.
Variables
A variable is a condition or characteristic that can take on different values or categories.
A much-studied educational variable is intelligence,which varies from low to high for different
people.Age is another variable that varies from low to high (e.g.,from 1 minute old to 130 years
old or so).Another variable is gender,which is either male or female.To better understand the
concept of a variable, it is helpful to compare it with a constant, its opposite.A constant is a
single value or category of a variable. Here’s the idea: The variable gender is a marker for two
constants: male and female.The category (i.e., constant) male is a marker for only one thing;
38 PA R T I: IN T RO D U C TI O N
Quantitative
research
Research that relies
primarily on the
collection of
quantitative data
TABLE 2.2 Common Types of Variables Classified by Level of Measurement and by Role of Variable
Variable Type Key Characteristic Example
Level of Measurement
Categorical variable A variable that is made up of different types or
categories of a phenomenon
The variable gender is made up of the categories of
male and female.
Quantitative variable A variable that varies in degree or amount of a
phenomenon
The variable annual income varies from zero income
to a very high income level.
Role Taken by the Variable
Independent variable
(symbolized as IV)
A variable that is presumed to cause changes to occur
in another variable; a causal variable
Amount of studying (IV) affects test grades (DV).
Dependent variable
(symbolized as DV)
A variable that changes because of another variable;
the effect or outcome variable
Amount of studying (IV) affects test grades (DV).
Mediating variable (also
called an intervening
variable)
A variable that comes in between other variables,
helping to delineate the process through which
variables affect one another
Amount of studying (IV) leads to input and
organization of knowledge in long-term memory
(mediating variable),which affects test grades (DV).
Moderator variable A variable that delineates how a relationship of
interest changes under different conditions or
circumstances
Perhaps the relationship between studying (IV) and
test grades (DV) changes according to the different
levels of use of a drug such as Ritalin (moderator).
Extraneous variable A variable that may compete with the independent
variable in explaining an outcome
Perhaps an observed relationship between coffee
drinking (IV) and cancer (DV) is actually due to
smoking cigarettes
Variable
A condition or
characteristic that
can take on
different values or
categories
Constant
A single value or
category of a
variable
11. itisoneof thetwoconstantsformingthevariablecalledgender.Gendervaries,butmaledoesnot
vary.Therefore,gender is a variable,and male is a constant.In the case of the variable age,all of
the ages make up the values (i.e.,constants) of the variable,and each value (e.g.,13 years old) is
a constant.If you are still having a hard time with the distinction between a variable and a con-
stant, think of it like this:A variable is like a set of things,and a constant is one of those things.
The variables that we just used, age and gender, are actually different types of variables.
Age is a quantitative variable,and gender is a categorical variable.A quantitative variable is
a variable that varies in degree or amount.It usually involves numbers.A categorical variable
isavariablethatvariesintypeorkind.Itusuallyinvolvesdifferentgroups.Agetakesonnumbers
(e.g., number of years old), and gender takes on two types or kinds (male and female). Now
consider the variable annual income. How does it vary? It varies in amount, ranging from no
income at all to some very large amount of income. Therefore, income is a quantitative vari-
able. If you think about how much money you made last year,you can determine your value on
thevariableannualincome.Nowthinkaboutthevariablereligion.Howdoesthisvariablevary?
It varies in kind or type.For instance,it can take on any of the categories standing for the dif-
ferent world religions (e.g.,Christianity,Judaism,Islam).For practice identifying quantitative
and categorical variables,take a look at the examples in Table 2.3.
Chapter 2: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research 39
See Journal Article 2.1
on the study site.
Quantitative
variable
Variable that varies
in degree or
amount
Categorical
variable
Variable that varies
by type or kind
TABLE 2.3 Examples of Quantitative and Categorical Variables
Quantitative Variables Categorical Variables
Height Gender
Weight Religion
Temperature Ethnicity
Annual income Method of therapy
Most aptitude tests College major
Most achievement tests Political party identification
School size Type of school
Class size Marital status of parents
Self-esteem level Student retention (retained or not)
Grade point average Type of teacher expectation
Teacher-pupil ratio Native language
Time spent on homework Teaching method
Age Personality type
Anxiety level Learning style
Job satisfaction score Type of feedback
Number of behavioral outbursts Computer use (or not)
Reading performance Type of reading instruction
Spelling accuracy Inclusion (or not)
Number of performance errors Problem-solving strategy used
Rate of cognitive processing Memory strategy used
Dropout rate Social class
12. Yetanothercategorizationschemeforvariablesistospeakof independentanddependent
variables.An independent variable is a variable that is presumed to cause a change to occur
inanothervariable.Sometimestheindependentvariableismanipulatedbytheresearcher(i.e.,
the researcher determines the value of the independent variable); at other times,the indepen-
dent variable is studied by the researcher but is not directly manipulated (i.e., the researcher
studieswhathappenswhenanindependentvariablechangesnaturally).Theindependentvari-
able is an antecedent variable because it must come before another variable if it is to produce
a change in it.A dependent variable is the variable that is presumed to be influenced by one
or more independent variables.The dependent variable is the variable that is“dependent on”
the independent (i.e., antecedent) variable(s).A cause-and-effect relationship between an
independent variable and a dependent variable is present when changes in the independent
variabletendtocausechangesinthedependentvariable.Sometimesresearcherscallthedepen-
dentvariableanoutcomevariableoraresponsevariablebecauseitisusedtomeasuretheeffect
of one or more independent variables.
Here is a simple example of a cause-and-effect relationship.Think about the U.S.Surgeon
General’swarningprintedoncigarettepackages:“SmokingCausesLungCancer,HeartDisease,
Emphysema, and May Complicate Pregnancy.”Can you identify the independent and depen-
dentvariablesinthisrelationship?Itissmokingthatispresumedtocauselungcancerandsev-
eralotherdiseases.(Youshouldbeawarethatextensiveresearchbeyondsimplyobservingthat
smoking and lung cancer were associated was conducted to establish that the link between
smokingandcancerwascausal.)Inthisexample,smokingistheindependentvariable(theval-
ues corresponding to the number of cigarettes smoked a day), and presence of lung cancer is
the dependent variable (the values being lung cancer present and lung cancer not present).
Forshorthand,wecoulduseIVtostandforindependentvariableandDVtostandfordepen-
dent variable.We also sometimes use an arrow:IV DV.The arrow means“tends to cause
changes in” or “affects.” In words, this says that the researcher believes “changes in the inde-
pendent variable tend to cause changes in the dependent variable.” In the smoking example,
we write Smoking Onset of Lung Cancer.
Another type of variable is an intervening variable (also commonly called a mediating
or mediator variable).An intervening or mediating variable occurs between two other vari-
ables in a causal chain (Kenny,Kashy,& Bolger,1998).In the case X Y,we have only an inde-
pendent variable and a dependent variable. In the case X I Y, we have an intervening
variable(I)occurringbetweenthetwoothervariables.Inthecaseof smoking,perhapsaninter-
vening variable is the development of damaged lung cells. In other words, smoking tends to
lead to the development of damaged lung cells,which tends to lead to lung cancer.It is helpful
toidentifyinterveningvariablesbecausethesevariablesmayhelpexplaintheprocessbywhich
an independent variable leads to changes in a dependent variable.
As another example,let X stand for teaching approach (perhaps the levels of this variable
arelecturemethodandcooperativegroupmethod),andletYstandfortestscoreonclassexam
(varying from 0 to 100 percent correct). Research may show that X Y; that is, test scores
depend on which teaching approach is used. In this case, an intervening variable might be
studentmotivation(varyingfromlowmotivationtohighmotivation).Therefore,thefullcausal
chain is X I Y, where X is teaching approach, I is student motivation, and Y is students’
test scores; that is,teaching method student motivation student test scores.
The next type of variable is a moderator variable.A moderator variable is a variable that
changes(i.e.,moderates)therelationshipbetweenothervariables.It’savariablethatdelineates
40 PA R T I: IN T RO D U C TI O N
Independent
variable
A variable that is
presumed to cause
a change in another
variable
Dependent
variable
A variable that is
presumed to be
influenced by one
or more
independent
variables
Cause-and-effect
relationship
Relationship in
which one variable
affects another
variable
Intervening or
mediating
variable
A variable that
occurs between two
other variables in a
causal chain; it’s a
mediating variable.
Moderator
variable
A variable that
changes the
relationship
between other
variables
13. howarelationshipchangesunderdifferentconditionsorcontextsorfordifferentkindsof people.
For example,you might analyze a set of research data and find that there is little or no differ-
encebetweentheperformancescoresof studentswhoaretaughtbyusingthelectureapproach
and the students who are taught by using the cooperative learning approach.On further analy-
sis, however, you might learn that cooperative learning works better for extroverted students
and that lecture works better for introverted students. In this example, personality type is a
moderator variable: The relationship between teaching approach and performance scores
depends on the personality type of the student. One thing we commonly find in research on
teaching is that what works well depends on the type of student.As you can see,it is helpful to
know the important moderator variables so that you can adjust your teaching accordingly.
Experimental Research
The purpose of experimental research is to determine cause-and-effect relationships.The
experimental research method enables us to identify causal relationships because it allows us
toobserve,undercontrolledconditions,theeffectsof systematicallychangingoneormorevari-
ables.Specifically,inexperimentalresearch,theresearchermanipulatestheindependentvari-
able, actively intervening in the world,and then observes what happens.Thus,manipulation,
an intervention studied by an experimenter,is the key defining characteristic of experimental
research. The use of manipulation in studying cause-and-effect relationships is based on the
activity theory of causation (Collingwood,1940; Cook & Shadish,1994).Active manipulation
is involved only in experimental research.Because of this (and because of experimental con-
trol), experimental research provides the strongest evidence of all the research methods about
the existence of cause-and-effect relationships.
In a simple experiment,a researcher will systematically vary an independent variable and
assessitseffectsonadependentvariable.Forexample,perhapsaneducationalresearcherwants
todeterminetheeffectof anewteachingapproachonreadingachievement.Theresearchercould
performthenewteachingapproachwithonegroupof participantsandperformthetraditional
teaching approach with another group of participants.After the treatment, the experimenter
would determine which group showed the greater amount of learning (reading achievement).
If the group receiving the new teaching approach showed the greater gain,then the researcher
would tentatively conclude that the new approach is better than the traditional approach.
Althoughthetypeof experimentjustdescribedissometimesdone,thereisapotentialprob-
lem with it.What if the two groups of students differed on variables,such as vocabulary,read-
ingability,and/orage?Morespecifically,whatif thestudentsinthenewteachingapproachgroup
happened to be older,had better vocabularies,and were better readers than the students in the
traditional teaching approach group? Furthermore,suppose the students with better vocabu-
laries,whowereolder,andwhowerebetterreadersalsotendedtolearnmorequicklythanother
students.If this were the case,then it is likely that the students in the new teaching approach
group would have learned faster regardless of the teaching approach.In this example,the vari-
ables age,vocabulary,and reading ability are called extraneous variables.
Extraneousvariablesarevariablesotherthantheindependentvariableof interest(e.g.,
teaching approach) that may be related to the outcome.When extraneous variables are not
controlled for or dealt with in some way,an outside reviewer of the research study may come
up with competing explanations for the research findings. The reviewer might argue that
the outcome is due to a particular extraneous variable rather than to the independent variable.
Chapter 2: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research 41
Experimental
research
Research in which
the researcher
manipulates the
independent
variable and is
interested in
showing cause and
effect
Manipulation
An intervention
studied by an
experimenter
Extraneous
variable
A variable that may
compete with the
independent
variable in
explaining the
outcome
14. These competing explanations for the relationship between an independent and a depen-
dent variable are sometimes called alternative explanations or rival hypotheses. In our
example, the researcher cannot know whether the students in the new teaching approach
performed better because of the teaching approach or because they had better vocabular-
ies, were older, or were better readers. All these factors are said to be confounded; that is,
these factors are entangled with the independent variable, and the researcher can’t state
which is the most important factor.Sometimes we use the term confounding variables to
refer to extraneous variables that were not controlled for by the researcher and are the rea-
son a particular result occurred.
Because the presence of extraneous variables makes the interpretation of research find-
ingsdifficult,theeffectiveresearcherattemptstocontrolthemwheneverpossible.Thebestway
to control for extraneous variables in an experiment like the one above is to randomly assign
research participants to the groups to be compared.Random assignment helps ensure that the
people in the groups to be compared are similar before the intervention or manipulation.For
example,if theresearcherwantstorandomlyassign30peopletotwogroups,thentheresearcher
might put 30 slips of paper,each with one name on it,into a hat and randomly pull out 15 slips.
The15namesthatarepulledoutwillbecomeoneof thetwogroups,andthe15namesremain-
ing in the hat will become the other group.When this is done,the only differences between the
groupswillbeduetochance.Inotherwords,thepeopleinthegroupswillbesimilaratthestart
of theexperiment.Aftermakingthegroupssimilar,theresearcheradministersthelevelsof the
independent variable, making the groups different only on this variable. Perhaps teaching
method is the independent variable, and the levels are cooperative learning and lecture. The
administrationof theindependentvariable,ormanipulation,wouldinvolveexposingonegroup
to cooperative learning and the other group to lecture.Then if the two groups become differ-
ent after the manipulation,the researcher can conclude that the difference was due to the inde-
pendent variable.
In summary,(1) the experimenter uses random assignment to make the groups similar;
(2) the experimenter does something different with the groups; and (3) if the groups then
become different,the experimenter concludes that the difference was due to what the experi-
menterdid(i.e.,itwasduetotheindependentvariable).Inlaterchapters,wewillintroduceyou
to additional methods that are used to control for extraneous variables when one is not able to
use random assignment. For now, remember that random assignment to groups is the most
effective way to make the groups similar and therefore control for extraneous variables.
Nonexperimental Research
In nonexperimental research, there is no manipulation of an independent variable.
Therealsoisnorandomassignmenttogroupsbytheresearcher—youwilllearninlaterchap-
ters that random assignment is only possible in the strongest of the various experimental
designs.As a result of these two deficiencies (no manipulation and no random assignment),
evidence gathered in support of cause-and-effect relationships in nonexperimental research
is severely limited and much weaker than evidence gathered in experimental research (espe-
cially experimental research designs that include random assignment).If you want to study
cause and effect, you should try to conduct an experiment, but sometimes this is not feasi-
ble.When important causal research questions need to be answered and an experiment can-
not be done,research must still be conducted.In research,we try to do the best we can,and
42 PA R T I: IN T RO D U C TI O N
Confounding
variable
An extraneous
variable that was
not controlled for
and is the reason a
particular
“confounded” result
is observed
Nonexperimental
research
Research in which
the independent
variable is not
manipulated and
there is no random
assignment to
groups
15. sometimes this means that we must use weaker research methods.For example, during the
1960s, extensive research linking cigarette smoking to lung cancer was conducted.
Experimental research with humans was not possible because it would have been unethical.
Therefore,inadditiontoexperimentalresearchwithlaboratoryanimals,medicalresearchers
relied on nonexperimental research methods for their extensive study of humans.
One type of nonexperimental research is sometimes called causal-comparative research.
Incausal-comparativeresearch,theresearcherstudiestherelationshipbetweenoneormore
categoricalindependentvariablesandoneormorequantitativedependentvariables.Inthemost
basic case,there are a single categorical independent variable and a single quantitative depen-
dent variable.Because the independent variable is categorical (e.g.,males vs.females,parents
vs.nonparents,orpublicschoolteachersvs.privateschoolteachers),thedifferentgroups’aver-
age scores on a dependent variable are compared to determine whether a relationship is pre-
sentbetweentheindependentanddependentvariables.Forexample,if theindependentvariable
is student retention (and the categories of the variable are retained in the first grade and not
retained in the first grade) and the dependent variable is level of achievement,then the retained
students’averageachievementwouldbecomparedtothenonretainedstudents’averageachieve-
ment. (Which group do you think would have higher achievements on average:the retained or
the nonretained students?)
Despitethepresenceof thewordcausalincludedinthetermcausal-comparativeresearch,
keepinmindthatcausal-comparativeresearchisanonexperimentalresearchmethod,which
meansthat thereisnomanipulationof anindependentvariable byaresearcher.Furthermore,
techniques of controlling for extraneous variables are more limited than in experimental
research (in which random assignment may be possible). Because of the lack of manipula-
tion and weaker techniques of controlling for extraneous variables,it is much more difficult
to make statements about cause and effect in causal-comparative research than in experi-
mental research. Do not be misled by the word causal in the name of this type of research,
and remember that well-designed experimental research is virtually always better for deter-
mining cause and effect,
An example of causal-comparative research is a study entitled “Gender Differences in
MathematicsAchievementandOtherVariablesAmongUniversityStudents”(Rech,1996).Rech
compared the average performance levels of males with the average performance levels of
females in intermediate algebra and college algebra courses at a large urban commuter uni-
versity. In the intermediate algebra course, Rech found that females did slightly better than
males.The average percentage correct for females was 75 percent,and the average percentage
correct for males was 73.8 percent.In the college algebra course,the difference in female and
maleperformancewasevensmaller(74.3percentversus73.9percent).Thedatawerecollected
from more than 2,300 research participants over six semesters.
It was mentioned earlier that the basic case of causal-comparative research involves a
single categorical independent variable and a single quantitative dependent variable. To
design a basic causal-comparative study as an exercise, look at Table 2.3 and find a cate-
gorical variable that can serve as your independent variable (i.e., one that you would not
manipulate) and a quantitative variable that can be your dependent variable.As an example,
we can select retention as the independent variable and self-esteem as a dependent vari-
able.We hypothesize that student retention (retained versus nonretained) has an influence
on self-esteem. More specifically, we predict that, on average, retained students will have
lower self-esteem than nonretained students.We would have to go to a school and collect
Chapter 2: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research 43
Causal-
comparative
research
A form of
nonexperimental
research in which
the primary
independent
variable of interest
is a categorical
variable
16. data if we actually wanted to conduct a research study to see whether there is any support
for this hypothesis.
Another nonexperimental research method is called correlational research.As in causal-
comparative research, there is no manipulation of an independent variable in correlational
research.Incorrelationalresearch,theresearcherstudiestherelationshipbetweenoneormore
quantitative independent variables and one or more quantitative dependent variables; that is,
in correlational research, the independent and dependent variables are quantitative. In this
chapter,we introduce the basic case in which the researcher has a single quantitative indepen-
dentvariableandasinglequantitativedependentvariable.Tounderstandhowtostudytherela-
tionship between two variables when both variables are quantitative, you need a basic
understanding of a correlation coefficient.
A correlation coefficient is a numerical index that provides information about the
strengthanddirectionof therelationshipbetweentwovariables.Itprovidesinformationabout
how two variables are associated. More specifically, a correlation coefficient is a number that
can range from −1 to 1, with zero standing for no correlation at all. If the number is greater
than zero,there is a positive correlation.If the number is less than zero,there is a negative cor-
relation. If the number is equal to zero,then there is no correlation between the two variables
beingcorrelated.If thenumberisequalto+1.00orequalto–1.00,thecorrelationiscalledper-
fect; that is,it is as strong as possible.Now we provide an explanation of these points.
A positivecorrelationispresent whenscoreson twovariablestendtomove in the same
direction.For example,consider the variables high school GPA and SAT (the college entrance
exam). How do you think scores on these two variables are related? A diagram of this rela-
tionship is shown in Figure 2.2a.As you can see there,the students who have high GPAs tend
also to have high scores on the SAT,and students who have low GPAs tend to have low scores
on the SAT.That’s the relationship.We say that GPA and SAT are positively correlated because
as SAT scores increase,GPAs also tend to increase (i.e.,the variables move in the same direc-
tion). Because of this relationship,researchers can use SAT scores to help make predictions
about GPAs. However, because the correlation is not perfect, the prediction is also far from
perfect.
Anegativecorrelationispresentwhenthescoresontwovariablestendtomoveinoppo-
site directions—as one variable goes up, the other tends to go down, and vice versa. For
example, consider these variables: amount of daily cholesterol consumption and life
expectancy.Howdoyouthinkthesevariablesarerelated?Doyouthinktherelationshipmeets
thedefinitionof anegativecorrelation?Adiagramof thisrelationshipisshowninFigure2.2b.
Youcanseethatasdailycholesterolconsumptionincreases,lifeexpectancytendstodecrease.
That is, the variables move in opposite directions. Therefore, researchers can use informa-
tionaboutcholesterolconsumptiontohelppredictlifeexpectancies.Highvaluesononevari-
able are associated with low values on the other variable and vice versa.This is what we mean
by a negative correlation.
At this point,you know the difference between a positive correlation (the variables move
in the same direction) and a negative correlation (the variables move in opposite directions).
Thereis,however,onemorepointaboutacorrelationcoefficientthatyouneedtoknow.Inaddi-
tion to the direction of a correlation (positive or negative),we are interested in the strength of
the correlation.By strength, we mean“How strong is the relationship?”Remember this point:
Zero means no relationship at all,and +1.00 and −1.00 mean that the relationship is as strong
as possible.
44 PA R T I: IN T RO D U C TI O N
Correlational
research
A form of
nonexperimental
research in which
the primary
independent
variable of interest
is a quantitative
variable
Correlation
coefficient
A numerical index
that indicates the
strength and
direction of the
relationship
between two
variables
Positive
correlation
The situation when
scores on two
variables tend to
move in the same
direction
Negative
correlation
The situation when
scores on two
variables tend to
move in opposite
directions
17. The higher the number (the negative sign is ignored),the stronger the relationship is.For
example,if you have a correlation of −.5,then ignore the negative sign and you have .5,which
shows the strength of the correlation. Therefore, a correlation of −.5 and a correlation of +.5
havethesamestrength.Theonlydifferencebetweenthetwoisthedirectionof therelationship
(−.5 is a negative correlation,and +.5 is a positive correlation).When you are interested in its
strength,it does not matter whether a correlation is positive or negative.The strength of a cor-
relation operates like this: Zero stands for no correlation at all (i.e., it is the smallest possible
strength), and +1.00 and −1.00 are as strong as a correlation can ever be. That is, +1.00 and
−1.00 are equally strong; in research jargon, we say that both +1.00 and −1.00 are perfect
correlations. The only difference between +1.00 and −1.00 is the direction of the relationship,
not the strength.You can see some diagrams of correlations of different strengths and direc-
tions in Figure 2.3.
If you found the previous paragraph a little hard to understand,here is a different way to
determine how strong a correlation is. Simply check to see how far away the number is from
zero.The farther the number is from zero,the stronger the correlation is.A correlation of .9 is
stronger than a correlation of .2 because it is farther from zero.Likewise,a correlation of −.9 is
stronger than a correlation of −.2 because it,too,is farther from zero.Now for a trick question.
Which correlation do you believe is stronger: −.90 or +.80? The answer is −.90 because −.90 is
farther from zero than +.80.(I think you’ve got it!)
This is only a brief introduction to the idea of a correlation coefficient.You will become
more comfortable with the concept the more you use it, and we will be using the concept
often in later chapters. For now, you should clearly understand that you can have positive
and negative correlations or no correlation at all and that some correlations are stronger
than other correlations. You have learned more already than you thought you would,
haven’t you?
Chapter 2: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research 45
FIGURE 2.2 Examples of positive and negative correlation
(a) Positive Correlation
4
3
2
1
0
Low High
SAT Score
HighSchoolGPA
(b) Negative Correlation
Very
High
Very
HighCholesterol Consumption
LifeExpectancy
Very
Low
Very
Low
18. 46 PA R T I: IN T RO D U C TI O N
FIGURE 2.3 Correlations of different
strengths and directions
r = 1.00 r = −1.00
r = −.75r = .75
(a) Perfect Correlations
(b) Large or Strong Correlations
(c) Small or Weak Correlations
r = .30 r = −.30
r = 0
(d) No Correlation
19. In the most basic form of correlational research, the researcher examines the correla-
tion between two quantitative variables. For example, perhaps an educational psychologist
has a theory stating that global self-esteem (which is a relatively stable personality trait)
shouldpredictclassperformance.Morespecifically,theeducationalpsychologistpredictsthat
students entering a particular history class with high self-esteem will tend to do better than
students entering the class with low self-esteem and vice versa. To test this hypothesis, the
researcher could collect the relevant data and calculate the correlation between self-esteem
and performance on the class examinations.We would expect a positive correlation (i.e.,the
higher the self-esteem, the higher the performance on the history exam). In our hypotheti-
cal example,let’s say that the correlation was +.5.That is a medium-size positive correlation,
and it would support our hypothesis of a positive correlation.
In our example of self-esteem and class performance,the researcher would be able to say
virtually nothing about cause and effect based on the correlation of .5.About all that one can
claim is that there is a relationship between self-esteem and class performance:The higher the
self-esteem,the better the class performance.This is the same problem that we experienced in
the basic case of causal-comparative research in which there is one independent variable and
one dependent variable.
Therearethreekeyproblemswiththebasic(two-variable)casesof correlationalandcausal-
comparative research described in this chapter:
1. There is no manipulation of the independent variable by the researcher.
2. It can be difficult to determine the temporal order of the variables (i.e.,which of the variables
occurs first).
3. There are usually too many other reasons why we might observe the relationship (i.e.,the cor-
relation or the difference between groups); that is,there are usually too many extraneous vari-
ables that are left unexplained and act as rival or alternative explanations for why something
occurs in the world.
Remember this important point:You must not jump to a conclusion about cause and effect
in a nonexperimental research study in which the researcher has examined only the relation-
shipbetweentwovariables,suchasexaminingacorrelationcoefficientincorrelationalresearch
or comparing two group means in causal-comparative research.Simply finding a relationship
between self-esteem and class performance (correlational research) or between gender and
classperformance(causal-comparativeresearch)isnotsufficientevidenceforconcludingthat
the relationship is causal.Therefore,you must not jump to that conclusion.We will discuss the
issue of cause and effect more in later chapters.We will also show how you can obtain some
evidence of cause and effect using nonexperimental research by improving on the basic cases
of correlational and causal-comparative research discussed in this chapter.We contend that
the terms correlational and causal-comparative are not very useful for educational research
(Johnson,2001);wethinkitisbettertofocusonweakandstrongernonexperimentalresearch
and to learn what factors make nonexperimental quantitative research weak or stronger with
regard to cause and effect. For now, make sure you remember this key point: Experimental
research with random assignment is the single best research method for determining cause-
and-effect relationships,and nonexperimental research methods (i.e.,correlational and causal-
comparative) are much weaker.
Chapter 2: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research 47
20. 48 PA R T I: IN T RO D U C TI O N
2.3 What is the difference between a categorical variable and a quantitative variable? Think of an
example of each.
2.4 Why is experimental research more effective than nonexperimental research when a researcher
is interested in studying cause and effect?
2.5 What are the three main problems with the simple cases of causal-comparative and correla-
tional research?
2.6 What are two variables that you believe are positively correlated?
2.7 What are two variables that you believe are negatively correlated?
R E V I E W
Q U E S T I O N S
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS
As you saw in Table 2.1, qualitative research is based on qualitative data and tends to follow
the exploratory mode of the scientific method.In this book,we will be discussing five specific
types of qualitative research: phenomenology, ethnography, case study, grounded theory, and
historicalresearch.Chapters14and15providedetaileddiscussionsofthesefivekindsofresearch;
nowweintroduceyoutothekeyideasof eachof theseresearchmethodstoforeshadowourlater,
in-depth discussions of these methods.
Phenomenology
The first major type of qualitative research is phenomenology.When conducting a phe-
nomenological research study,a researcher attempts to understand how one or more individ-
uals experience a phenomenon.For example,you might conduct a phenomenological study of
elementary school students who have lost a parent to understand better how schoolchildren
experience bereavement. The key element of a phenomenological research study is that the
researcherattemptstounderstandhowpeopleexperienceaphenomenonfromtheperson’sown
perspectives.Your goal is to enter the inner world of each participant to understand his or her
perspectives and experiences.Phenomenological researchers have studied many phenomena,
such as what it is like to participate in a religious group that handles serpents as part of the
worship service (Williamson,Pollio,& Hood,2000),the experience of grief (Bailley,Dunham,
& Kral,2000),the experience of learning to become a music teacher (Devries,2000),the expe-
rience of living with alcoholism (Smith, 1998), the meaning of age for young and old adults
(Adams-Price, Henley, & Hale, 1998), and elementary school children’s experiences of stress
(Omizo & Omizo,1990).
Ethnography
Ethnography is one of the most popular approaches to qualitative research in education.
The word ethnography literally means “writing about people.” When ethnographers conduct
research,they are interested in describing the culture of a group of people and learning what it
is like to be a member of the group from the perspective of the members of that group.That is,
theyareinterestedindocumentingthingslikethesharedattitudes,values,norms,practices,pat-
ternsof interaction,perspectives,andlanguageof agroupof people.Theymayalsobeinterested
Qualitative
research
Research that relies
primarily on the
collection of
qualitative data
Ethnography
A form of
qualitative research
focused on
discovering and
describing the
culture of a group
of people
Culture
The shared
attitudes, values,
norms, practices,
patterns of
interaction,
perspectives, and
language of a
group of people
Phenomenology
A form of
qualitative research
in which the
researcher attempts
to understand how
one or more
individuals
experience a
phenomenon
21. inthematerialthingsthatthegroupmembersproduceoruse,suchasclothingstyles,ethnicfoods,
andarchitecturalstyles.Ethnographerstrytouseholisticdescriptions;thatis,theytrytodescribe
howthemembersofagroupinteractandhowtheycometogethertomakeupthegroupasawhole.
Inotherwords,thegroupismorethanjustthesumof itsparts.Justafewof themanygroupsthat
ethnographershavestudiedrecentlyareagroupofpanhandlerslivingonthestreetsofWashington,
D.C.(Lankenau,1999),men with mental retardation living in a group home (Croft,1999),black
andwhitesororitymembers(Berkowitz&Padavic,1999),studentsinaU.S.historyclass(Keedy,
Fleming,Gentry,&Wheat,1998),sixth-grade students in science classes (Solot &Arluke,1997),
karaoke bar performers (Drew, 1997), Puerto Rican American parents with children in special
education(Harry,1992),andagroupofNativeAmericanstudentswhohaddroppedoutofschool
(Deyhle,1992).In all of these studies,the researchers were interested in describing some aspect
of the culture of the people in the study.
Case Study Research
In case study research,the researcher provides a detailed account of one or more cases.
Althoughcasestudyresearchusuallyreliesonqualitativedata,multiplemethodsarealsoused.
Case study research can be used to address exploratory,descriptive,and explanatory research
questions (Stake, 1995; Yin, 1994). Case study research is more varied than phenomenology,
which focuses on individuals’ experience of some phenomenon; ethnography, which focuses
on some aspect of culture; or grounded theory, which focuses on developing an explanatory
theory.What all pure case studies do have in common, however, is a focus on each case as a
whole unit (i.e.,case study research is holistic) as it exists in its real-life context.For example,
in“BuildingLearningOrganizationsinEngineeringCultures,”Ford,Voyer,andWilkinson(2000)
examinedhowaspecificorganizationchangedovertimeintoalearningorganization.Although
their focus was on a single case, other organizations might be able to learn from the experi-
ences of Ford and colleagues. In “The Journey Through College of Seven Gifted Females:
Influences on Their Career Related Decisions,”Grant (2000) examined in detail the personal,
social,andacademicexperiencesof sevenpeople.Afteranalyzingeachcase,Grantmadecross-
case comparisons,searching for similarities and differences.
Grounded Theory
Groundedtheoryresearchisaqualitativeapproachtogeneratinganddevelopingatheory
from the data you collect in a research study.You will recall from Chapter 1 that a theory is an
explanationof howandwhysomethingoperates.Wewillexplainthedetailsof groundedtheory
in Chapter 14; for now,remember that grounded theory is an inductive approach for generat-
ing theories or explanations. One example of a grounded theory is found in “An Analysis of
FactorsThatContributetoParent-SchoolConflictinSpecialEducation”byLakeandBillingsley
(2000).Lake and Billingsley wanted to explain why conflict takes place between the parents of
childreninspecialeducationprogramsandschoolofficials.LakeandBillingsleyconductedin-
depth interviews (lasting an average of 1 hour) with parents, principals, special education
program directors,and mediators.They identified several factors as contributing to the esca-
lation of parent-school conflict.The primary or core factor was a discrepancy in views about
thechild’sneeds.Theotherfactorswerelackof knowledge(e.g.,lackof problem-solvingknowl-
edge), disagreements over service delivery,the presence of constraints (e.g.,such as the lack of
Chapter 2: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research 49
See Journal Article 2.2
on the study site.
Holistic
description
The description of
how members of a
group interact and
how they come
together to make
up the group as a
whole
Case study
research
A form of
qualitative research
that is focused on
providing a
detailed account of
one or more cases
Grounded theory
research
A qualitative
approach to
generating and
developing a theory
from the data that
the researcher
collects
22. funds to deliver services), differences in how a child is valued, unilateral use of power, poor
communication, and lack of trust. In addition to discussing what factors lead to conflict, the
authors discussed how conflict can be reduced and how it can be prevented.As you can see,the
authorsgeneratedatentativeexplanationaboutconflictbasedontheirdata.Tostrengthentheir
explanation,theywouldneedtodeveloptheirtheoryfurtherandtestitwithnewempiricaldata
(which would result in a mixed research approach).
Historical Research
The last general type of research used by educational researchers and discussed in this
chapter is historical research, or research about people, places, and events in the past. This
type of research is sometimes called narrative research because it studies“the text of history,”
anditoftenpresentsitsresultsthroughstoriesornarratives.Althoughmanyhistoricalresearch
studies are best classified as mixed (e.g.,when quantitative and qualitative data are used),we
place this type of research under the heading of qualitative research because,generally speak-
ing, the data tend to be qualitative and the approach to the use of evidence and the forming of
arguments is closer to that of qualitative research than to quantitative research.As you know,
historical research is done so that researchers can better understand events that have already
occurred.
Educational historians have been able to find historical data that lend themselves to data
analysis and have studied how various educational phenomena operated in the past. For
example,educationalresearchersdocumentthehistoryof educationandimportanteventsthat
occurred in the past,study trends in education occurring over time,study the multiple factors
that led to certain events in the past,and study how things operated in the past (e.g.,different
teaching practices and the different outcomes that resulted from those practices).They might
also study the origin of current practices and document any changes over time.Historiography
is the word historians sometimes use to mean“research methods.”As you will learn in Chapter
15,historiography involves the posing of questions,the collection of authentic source materi-
als, the analysis and interpretation of those materials,and the composition of the results into
a final report. Historical research, like the other methods of research, has an important place
in education.
50 PA R T I: IN T RO D U C TI O N
Historical
research
Research about
people, places, and
events in the past
See Journal Article 2.3
on the study site.
2.8 What are the different types of qualitative research, and what is the defining feature of each
of these?
R E V I E W
Q U E S T I O N
MIXED RESEARCH
(OR MIXED METHODS RESEARCH)
In mixed research,the researcher uses a mixture or combination of quantitative and qualita-
tive methods, approaches, or concepts in a single research study or in a set of related studies.
Thequalitativeandquantitativepartsofaresearchstudymightbeconductedconcurrently(con-
ducting both parts at roughly the same time) or sequentially (conducting one part first and the
23. other second) to address a research question or a set of related questions.For example,let’s say
that you are interested in studying the phenomenon of living with dyslexia for high school
students.Youmightdecidefirsttoconductaqualitative(exploratory)componentofyourresearch
studybyconductingopen-endedorunstructuredinterviewswith10or20highschoolstudents
who have dyslexia so that you can directly hear from these students in their own words what it
is like to live with dyslexia. On the basis of the data from this phase of your overall study and
fromyourreadingofthecurrentresearchliterature,youconstructaclosed-endedandmorestruc-
turedquestionnaire.Next,inthequantitativephaseof yourstudy,youaskanothergroupof high
school students with dyslexia to rate how descriptive each of the characteristics on the struc-
turedquestionnaireisof them.Forthisquantitativephaseof yourstudy,youmightselectasam-
ple of students with dyslexia from several high schools and have these students fill out your
questionnaire.Youthenanalyzeyourquestionnairedataandwriteupyour“integrated”findings
from the qualitative and quantitative parts of your research study.In this example,the qualita-
tive phase was used to explore the words,categories,and dimensions to include in a structured
questionnaire.Then you started testing (or validating) how well the questionnaire operated in
the quantitative phase.Together,the qualitative and quantitative approaches produced a supe-
rior questionnaire.
The Advantages of Mixed Research
We view the use of multiple perspectives,theories,and research methods as a strength in
educationalresearch.Infact,weviewthequantitativeandqualitativeresearchmethodsascom-
plementary.When mixing research or when you read and evaluate research that involved mix-
ing, be sure to consider the fundamental principle of mixed research,which says that it is
wise to collect multiple sets of data using different research methods, epistemologies, and
approaches in such a way that the resulting mixture or combination has complementary
strengths and nonoverlapping weaknesses (Johnson & Turner, 2003). The idea of comple-
mentary strengths here means that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.The mixed
approach helps improve the quality of research because the different research approaches have
different strengths and different weaknesses.
By combining two (or more) research methods with different strengths and weaknesses in
a research study, you can make it less likely that you will miss something important or make a
mistake.The famous qualitative researchers Lincoln and Guba (1985) explained this idea using
the metaphor of fish nets.Perhaps a fisherman has several fishing nets,each with one or more
holes.To come up with one good net,the fisherman decides to overlap the different fishing nets,
forming one overall net.All the nets have holes in them;however,when the nets are put together,
therewillprobablynolongerbeaholeintheoverallnet.Inthecaseofresearchmethods,anexper-
imentalresearchstudymightdemonstratecausalitywell,butitmightbelimitedinrealismbecause
of the confines of the research laboratory. On the other hand, an ethnographic research study
might not demonstrate causality especially well,but it can be done in the field,which enables a
researcher to observe behavior as it naturally takes place and therefore increases realism.When
both methods are used,causality is strong,and realism is no longer a big problem.Although it is
often not practical to use more than one research method or strategy in a single research study,
youshouldbeawareofthepotentialbenefitofusingmultiplemethodsandstrategies.Furthermore,
even if a researcher does not use multiple approaches or methods in a single research study,the
relevantsetof publishedresearchstudieswillusuallyincluderesearchbasedonseveraldifferent
Chapter 2: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research 51
Mixed research
Research that
involves the mixing
of quantitative and
qualitative methods
or other paradigm
characteristics
Fundamental
principle of mixed
research
Advises researchers
to thoughtfully and
strategically mix or
combine qualitative
and quantitative
research methods,
approaches,
procedures,
concepts, and other
paradigm
characteristics in a
way that produces
an overall design
with
complementary
strengths (broadly
viewed) and
nonoverlapping
weaknesses.
Complementary
strengths
The whole is
greater than the
sum of its parts.
24. 52 PA R T I: IN T RO D U C TI O N
researchmethods.Theresearchliteratureisthereforemixedmethod.Asaresult,themixedmethod
(or mixed fishing net) advantage will be gained in the overall area of research.
2.9 What is mixed research, and what is an example of this kind of research?
R E V I E W
Q U E S T I O N
OUR RESEARCH TYPOLOGY
The forms of research that we have covered in this chapter are shown in Figure 2.4.We will
discuss each of these types of research in later chapters.It is important to understand that all
of the major types of research that we discuss in this textbook have value! It is not uncom-
mon for an educational researcher to use several different types of research at different times.
A researcher should always select the appropriate research method on the basis of a consid-
eration of the research question(s) of interest,the objective(s) of the research,time and cost
constraints, available populations, the possibility (or not) of the manipulation of an inde-
pendent variable,and the availability of data.Sometimes a researcher will use more than one
research approach within a single study. However, even if researchers never used more than
one method in a single study,published research literature would still tend to include articles
based on different approaches and methods because of the diversity of the researchers work-
ing in the area.
When a research finding has been demonstrated by using more than one type of research,
one can place more confidence in it.We say that a finding has been corroborated if the same
resultisfoundbyusingdifferenttypesof research.Conversely,if differentdatasourcesortypes
of researchresultinconflictinginformation,thenadditionalresearchwillbeneededtoexplore
the nature of the phenomenon more completely and to determine the source of conflict.That
is,if differenttypesof researchresultindifferentfindings,thentheresearchershouldstudythe
FIGURE 2.4 Research typology (Later chapters will add a third level to this typology.)
1
Quantitative
research
2
Mixed
research
3
Qualitative
research
a
Experimental
a
Phenomenology
b
Ethnography
d
Grounded
theory
c
Case
study
e
Historical
b
Nonexperimental
Level 1: Methodological
Paradigm
Level 2: Research
Method
25. Chapter 2: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research 53
phenomenoninmoredepthtodeterminetheexactreasonfortheconflictingfindings.Theworld
is a complex and ever-changing place.As we study it,it is helpful to be equipped with the best
methods and approaches currently available.You will probably find that some methods and
approaches we discuss will fit your style or personality better than others. However, we hope
that you will keep an open mind as you learn about all of the kinds of research.All the research
methods can be useful if used properly.
2.10 What are the three research paradigms in education, and what are the major types of research
in each of these paradigms? (Hint: See Figure 2.4.)
R E V I E W
Q U E S T I O N
SUMMARY
The three major research traditions in educational research are qualitative research,quantitative research,and mixed
research.All three of these traditions are important and have value.Qualitative research tends to use the exploratory
scientific method to generate hypotheses and develop understandings about particular people, places, and groups
(e.g., in case studies, ethnography, phenomenology, and historical research).Qualitative researchers typically are not
interestedinmakinggeneralizations.Anexceptiontothislackof interestingeneralizingisfoundinthegroundedtheory
approach to qualitative research.Qualitative research is discovery oriented and is conducted in natural settings.On the
other hand,quantitative research is typically done under more tightly controlled conditions and tends to use the con-
firmatory scientific method,focusing on hypothesis testing and theory testing.Quantitative researchers hope to find
common patterns in thought and behavior and to generalize broadly.Mixed research involves mixing and combining
qualitative and quantitative research in single research studies.It is based on the philosophy of pragmatism (i.e.,what
works is what should be considered to be important in answering research questions). In this chapter, two quantita-
tive research types or methods were introduced (experimental and nonexperimental research), five types of qualita-
tive research were introduced (phenomenology,ethnography,case study,grounded theory,and historical),and mixed
research (which mixes or combines qualitative and quantitative research approaches in single research studies) was
introduced. In later chapters, we elaborate on each part of the research typology (i.e., our classification of the differ-
ent types of research) shown in Figure 2.4.
KEY TERMS
case study research (p.49)
categorical variable (p.39)
causal-comparative research (p.43)
cause-and-effect relationship (p.40)
complementary strengths (p.51)
confounding variable (p.42)
constant (p.38)
correlation coefficient (p.44)
correlational research (p.44)
culture (p.48)
dependent variable (p.40)
determinism (p.33)
ethnography (p.48)
experimental research (p.41)
extraneous variable (p.41)
fundamentalprincipleof mixedresearch
(p.51)
grounded theory research (p.49)
historical research (p.50)
holistic description (p.49)
incompatibility thesis (p.31)
independent variable (p.40)
intervening variable (p.40)
linguistic-relativity hypothesis (p.36)
manipulation (p.41)
mediating variable (p.40)
mixed research (pp.33,51)
26. 54 PA R T I: IN T RO D U C TI O N
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. Which of the three research paradigms do you like the most? Explain why?
2. If you find a statistical relationship between two variables (e.g., income and education, or gender and grades, or time
spent studying and grades) in a nonexperimental research study, should you confidently conclude that one variable is the
cause of the other variable?
3. What is an example of a positive correlation? What is an example of a negative correlation?
4. Following are several research questions.For each, list the research method that you believe would be most appropriate to use
in answering the question.
a. How do individuals experience the phenomenon of being one of only a few minority students in a predominantly homoge-
neous high school?
b. What is the effect of a new teaching technique on elementary school students’arithmetic performance?
c. Does cognitive therapy or behavioral therapy work better for treating childhood depression?
d. What is the culture of the band at a high school in your local community?
e. What is the relationship between the GRE and student performance in graduate school?
f. Do males and females have different performance levels in high school English classes?
g. Does the student-to-teacher ratio have an effect on elementary students’level of performance in the classroom?
h. What was it like being a middle school student in 1921 in the four-room school (where primary through high school were
taught) in Great Bridge,Virginia (which is located in the city of Chesapeake)?
i. Was John Dewey an effective schoolteacher?
j. Do students perform better on an academics test when they are exposed to a cooperative learning style or a lecture style of
teaching?
RESEARCH EXERCISES
1. Go to this book’s companion website or to a database on the website of your university library and locate a qualitative research
article,a quantitative research article,or a mixed methods research article.Briefly summarize the purpose of the research and
the methodology (i.e.,how it attempted to answer the research questions).Explain why you classified your article as a qualita-
tive, a quantitative,or a mixed research study.
2. Read the quantitative research study on the companion website and write a two-page (typed,double-spaced) summary of the
article.Organize your paper into the following three sections:
(1) Purpose:What was the research study about? What did the researchers hope to learn?
(2) Methods: How did the researchers carry out their research study? What did they actually do?
moderator variable (p.40)
negative correlation (p.44)
nonexperimental research (p.42)
phenomenology (p.48)
positive correlation (p.44)
pragmatism (p.32)
probabilistic causes (p.33)
qualitative research (pp.33,48)
quantitative research (pp.33,38)
quantitative variable (p.39)
research paradigm (p.31)
variable (p.38)
verstehen (p.36)
27. (3) Results:What were the key findings of the research study? Don’t worry about the technical jargon in the research article.Just
try to understand and clearly communicate the main ideas of the article.
3. Readthequalitativeresearchstudyonthecompanionwebsiteandwriteatwo-pagesummaryof thearticle.Organizeyourpaper
into the three sections described in Exercise 2 (purpose,methods,and results).
4. Readthemixedresearchstudyonthecompanionwebsiteandwriteatwo-pagesummaryof thearticle.Organizeyourpaperinto
the three sections described in Exercise 2 (purpose,methods,and results).
ACTION RESEARCH JOURNALING
Insight:Actionresearchersusuallyfollowthemixedresearchparadigmbecausetheyliketoselectwhatworksbestfrom
both qualitative and quantitative research.
1. What paradigm(s) do you like to operate from? Why?
2. What philosophical and practical assumptions do you think you tend to operate from? First,
what do you mean by the word reality, and do you think that reality is singular or plural?
(These are some of yourontological assumptions.) Second,do you think there is one best way
to gain knowledge or multiple ways,and what do you mean by“warranted or justified knowl-
edge”? (These are some of your epistemological assumptions.) Third,what research methods
discussed in this chapter do you think might be useful in learning about your world?
(This is one of your methodological assumptions.)
RELEVANT INTERNET SITES
Chapter 2: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research 55
See Journal Article 2.4
on the study site.
Quantitative research book materials and links.Go to Research
Methods, Design, and Analysis textbook website (under the
Website Gallery section).
http://www.pearsonhighered.com/educator/product/Research-
Methods-Design-and-Analysis/9780205701650.page
Qualitative research links
http://www.qualitativeresearch.uga.edu/QualPage/
Correlation coefficients
http://glass.ed.asu.edu/stats/lesson4/
Mixed research links
http://www.fiu.edu/~bridges/
STUDENT STUDY SITE
Visit the Student Study Site at www.sagepub.com/bjohnson4e/ for these additional learning tools:
Video Links
Self Quizzes
E-Flashcards
Learning Objectives
Full-text SAGE journal articles
Interactive Concept Maps
Web Resources
SPSS Exercises and Data Set
28. 56 PA R T I: IN T RO D U C TI O N
RECOMMENDED READING
Baron,R.M.,& Kenny,D.A.(1986).The moderator-mediator
variable distinction in social psychological research:
Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6),
1173–1182.
Christensen,L.B.(2007).Experimentalmethodology(10thed.).
Boston,MA:Allyn & Bacon.
Johnson, R. B. (2001). Toward a new classification of
nonexperimental quantitative research. Educational
Researcher, 30(2),3–13.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods
research: A research paradigm whose time has come.
Educational Researcher, 33(7),14–26.(Also available online
at http://aera.net/publications/?id=338)
Johnson,R.B.,Onwuegbuzie,A.J.,&Turner,L.A.(2007).Toward
a definition of mixed methods research.Journal of Mixed
Methods Research,1, 112–133.
Patton,M.Q.(2002).Qualitativeresearchandevaluationmethods
(3rd ed.).Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991).Measurement, design,
andanalysis:Anintegratedapproach.Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum.
Tashakkori,A.,&Teddlie,C.(Eds.).(2003).Handbookof mixed
methods in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.