This document summarizes the key differences between qualitative and quantitative research methods. Qualitative research aims to understand human behaviors and contexts through inductive analysis like interviews and observations, while quantitative research tests hypotheses through deductive analysis using numerical data and statistics. Some key differences include sample sizes (smaller for qualitative), data collection techniques (open-ended for qualitative vs. standardized for quantitative), and generalizability of findings (qualitative explores specific contexts while quantitative seeks broader application). The document also discusses mixed methods research, which combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to leverage their respective strengths.
This presentation slide was prepared by Niroj Dahal for second contact session for M Phil students at Nepal Open University (http://nou.edu.np/), Faculty of Social Science and Education.
Ethnographic research is one of the many crucial research methodologies in educational research. This well-researched ppt gives a clear picture of the what, how, and why of the research design.
A presentation about the added value of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. It begins with a brief discussion of qualitative research and how it is distinct from yet shares basic principles with quantitative research, followed by a discussion of four important ways mixed methods -- integrating qualitative and quantitative -- adds value to our research efforts, and then a discussion of mixed methods research -- what it is, typologies, alternatives to typologies, and the use of diagrams.
Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods DesignThiyagu K
A Research Design is simply a structural framework of various research methods as well as techniques that are utilized by a researcher. This presentation slides explain the resign design of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method design.
Presentation on how to code qualitative data. We examine two approaches: inductive (emergent themes) and deductive coding (theory-based). There are some activities you can use. Feel free to use and share.
This presentation slide was prepared by Niroj Dahal for second contact session for M Phil students at Nepal Open University (http://nou.edu.np/), Faculty of Social Science and Education.
Ethnographic research is one of the many crucial research methodologies in educational research. This well-researched ppt gives a clear picture of the what, how, and why of the research design.
A presentation about the added value of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. It begins with a brief discussion of qualitative research and how it is distinct from yet shares basic principles with quantitative research, followed by a discussion of four important ways mixed methods -- integrating qualitative and quantitative -- adds value to our research efforts, and then a discussion of mixed methods research -- what it is, typologies, alternatives to typologies, and the use of diagrams.
Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods DesignThiyagu K
A Research Design is simply a structural framework of various research methods as well as techniques that are utilized by a researcher. This presentation slides explain the resign design of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method design.
Presentation on how to code qualitative data. We examine two approaches: inductive (emergent themes) and deductive coding (theory-based). There are some activities you can use. Feel free to use and share.
lecture presented by Fe Angela M. Verzosa at PLAI-Southern Tagalog Region Librarians Council Seminar-workshop on the theme, “Research in Librarianship : Capacity Building to Strengthen Research Culture”, held 7 October 2015, El Grande Residencia Hotel and Resort, Brgy. San Carlos, Lipa City
Introduction to quantitative and qualitative researchLiz FitzGerald
This presentation, delivered in an Open University CALRG Building Knowledge session, gives a preliminary introduction to both quantitative and qualitative research approaches. There has been widespread debate when considering the relative merits of quantitative and qualitative strategies for research. Positions taken by individual researchers vary considerably, from those who see the two strategies as entirely separate, polar opposites that are based upon alternative views of the world, to those who are happy to mix these strategies within their research projects. We consider the different strengths, weaknesses and suitability of different approaches and draw upon some examples to highlight their use within educational technology.
Research is the systematic and objective analysis and recording of controlled observations that may lead to the development of generalizations, principles, or theories, resulting in prediction and possible control of events .
Though there are similarities concerning qualitative and quantitative research methodologies, both have distinguishing
fundamental ontological and epistemological perspectives that are unique to their respective research design. When contemplating a
methodological approach in order to answer a research question, qualitative and quantitative methodologies are not mutually
exclusive. Though the characteristics of each methodology are distinct, their corresponding qualities add to their rigor, and both
methodologies have the capacity to inform one another in order to generate, test, and confirm theory. To illustrate this, a qualitative
collective case study and a quantitative survey research method are examined. The application of each design is considered to the
extent of their usefulness in attaining a comprehensive understanding of complex phenomena. Finally, implications for future
research are also offered.
CHAPTER 1 THE SELECTION OF A RESEARCH APPROACHResearch approacEstelaJeffery653
CHAPTER 1 THE SELECTION OF A RESEARCH APPROACH
Research approaches are plans and the procedures for research that span the steps from broad assumptions to detailed methods of data collection, analysis, and interpretation. This plan involves several decisions, and they need not be taken in the order in which they make sense to us and the order of their presentation here. The overall decision involves which approach should be used to study a topic. Informing this decision should be the philosophical assumptions the researcher brings to the study; procedures of inquiry (called research designs); and specific research methods of data collection, analysis, and interpretation. The selection of a research approach is also based on the nature of the research problem or issue being addressed, the researchers’ personal experiences, and the audiences for the study. Thus, in this book, research approaches, research designs, and research methods are three key terms that represent a perspective about research that presents information in a successive way from broad constructions of research to the narrow procedures of methods.
THE THREE APPROACHES TO RESEARCH
In this book, three research approaches are advanced: (a) qualitative, (b) quantitative, and (c) mixed methods. Unquestionably, the three approaches are not as discrete as they first appear. Qualitative and quantitative approaches should not be viewed as rigid, distinct categories, polar opposites, or dichotomies. Instead, they represent different ends on a continuum (Creswell, 2015; Newman & Benz, 1998). A study tends to be more qualitative than quantitative or vice versa. Mixed methods research resides in the middle of this continuum because it incorporates elements of both qualitative and quantitative approaches.
Often the distinction between qualitative research and quantitative research is framed in terms of using words (qualitative) rather than numbers (quantitative), or better yet, using closed-ended questions and responses (quantitative hypotheses) or open-ended questions and responses (qualitative interview questions). A more complete way to view the gradations of differences between them is in the basic philosophical assumptions researchers bring to the study, the types of research strategies used in the research (e.g., quantitative experiments or qualitative casestudies), and the specific methods employed in conducting these strategies (e.g., collecting data quantitatively on instruments versus collecting qualitative data through observing a setting). Moreover, there is a historical evolution to both approaches—with the quantitative approaches dominating the forms of research in the social sciences from the late 19th century up until the mid-20th century. During the latter half of the 20th century, interest in qualitative research increased and along with it, the development of mixed methods research. With this background, it should prove helpful to view definitions of these three key t ...
Qualitative Research Methods Essay
What Is The Generic Qualitative Approach? Essay
Qualitative Reflection
Qualitative Research Essay
Importance Of Qualitative Research
Qualitative Exploratory Essay
Qualitative Research Strategy
Qualitative Research Evaluation Essay
Qualitative Research Methods
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research Essay
Qualitative Research Questions
Qualitative Research
Essay on Qualitative and Quantitative Research
Methodology Qualitative And Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research Essay
The Goal Of Qualitative Research Essay
Essay On Qualitative Research
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
2. 2
Qualitative Research in Education
Assumptions of Qualitative Research
Difference between Qualitative & Quantitative Research
By
Laraib
(15061701-005)
M.Phil 1st
Supervised by
Dr. Syed Shafqat Ali shah
Department of Education
UNIVERSITY OF GUJRAT
Session 2015-2017
3. 3
Table of Contents
1 Introduction
..................................................................................................................................... 4
2 Quantitative Researches
.................................................................................................................................... .4
3 Qualitative Researches
..................................................................................................................................... 5
4 Summaries of Differences
..................................................................................................................................... 6
5 Mixed Method Approach
......................................................................................................................................7
6. Differences between Qualitative and Quantitative Inquiry
…………………………………………………………………………………………8
7. Difference Between Qualitative & Quantitative Research
…………………………………………………………………………………………10
8. References
…………………………………………………………………………………………11
4. 4
Assumptions in Qualitative Research
By Laraib M.Phil Scholar
1. Introduction
The motivation of quantitative and qualitative research in two different paradigms – the
positivism and constructionist or post-positivism, accounts to a great extent for their
controversial discussion. Quantitative research can be described as a cause-effect relationship,
searching for standardization, reproducibility, and measurability. Qualitative research aims at
understanding and interpreting behaviors’, contexts, and interrelations. At first sight, these two
approaches to the understanding of science seem to be competing and even incompatible; there
are many publications contributing to the elaboration of their differences. However, lately there
have been considerations that quantitative and qualitative methods are two sides of one coin and
can complement each other in certain research situations. This summary gives a short overview
of these two methodologies, their strengths and weaknesses in the explanation of social realities,
and finally discusses a new approach to science, namely the combination of both.
2. Quantitative Researches:
There are many explanations to quantitative research, yet Aliaga & Gunderson (2002) describe it
as explaining a phenomenon by collecting quantitative (numerical) data that are analyzed using
mathematically based methods such as statistics. A common misconception is that quantitative
data does not require data that is naturally available in quantitative form. Non-quantitative data
(such as beliefs and/or attitudes) can be transformed into quantitative form by using
measurement instruments such as Likert scales. Despite its limitations, quantitative methods
have been more prominent in social sciences traditionally due to the fact that natural sciences
and their standard methods were seen as a model in this field (Flick, 2006). Yet, perhaps it was
the Chicago school that gave rise to widespread use of qualitative research in social sciences;
however, this did not last too long as Columbia school disrupted this convention and laid the
foundations of today, where the debate is still not fully resolved. Today, quantitative research is
5. 5
often placed in opposition to qualitative research, still a legacy of “clashes of schools”, dating
back to early 1900s (Hamel, Dufour & Fortin, 1993). The incompatible worldviews underlying
quantitative and qualitative methods gave birth to this ‘paradigm war’. It is often argued that the
quantitative research is more realistic and objective as compared to the qualitative research and
the researchers’ consensus is to use quantitative methods if there is a hypothesis to test, using
deductive reasoning.
The main strength of quantitative research is that it is neutral and easily generalizable; however,
it is challenging to gauge the theoretical constructs (e.g. innovation) in social sciences and
proxying them with several variables usually undermines establishing causality.
3. Qualitative Researches:
The qualitative turn in social research took place during the 70`s as a countermovement to
quantification, the landmark of natural sciences (Mayring 2002). This turn addressed the critique
of quantitative methods and research strategies, often judged as too standardized in order to
reflect the facets of social reality. Instead of testing, measuring, and experimenting, qualitative
research aims at understanding the subject of study (Mayring 2002). Creswell defines qualitative
research as the process of understanding a social or human phenomenon, based on
methodological research traditions. Researchers aim at generating a complex, holistic view, at
analyzing and describing the standpoint of the subjects within a natural context (Creswell 1998).
Hoffmann-Riem even advocates to let the theoretical structure of the object of research emerge
from the research subjects (1980, p.343). In the meanwhile qualitative social research has turned
into an interdisciplinary point of reference for new qualitative approaches (Mayring 2002).
Several lines of research can be seen as the roots of qualitative methods. Aristotle is regarded as
their prime father; for him historic and evolutionary developments as well as inductive
approaches belong to the understanding of science. Further precursor of qualitative thinking is
Gianbattista Vico who sees the practical and the truth as non-universal, but dependant on time
and space. Hermeneutics, as the effort to develop a foundation for scientific text interpretation, is
as well seen as one of the originators of qualitative approaches (Mayring 2002).
The main strength of qualitative research is its ability to create knowledge about new
phenomenon and complex interrelations that have not yet been researched thoroughly or at all
(Seipel & Rieker 2003). In such cases it is per definition a suitable approach for theory building,
elaboration, and testing, where theory implies a reference to context. Adequate methods for data
6. 6
collection within a qualitatively-oriented research project are e.g. problem-centred or narrative
interviews, group discussions, semi-structured interviews, archival or content analysis. Most of
these are very time-consuming due to two reasons: 1) the emphasis of qualitative research
methods is on context and verbal access to data (Hoffmann-Riem 1980) and 2) the research
process is circular and interactive. An inevitable consequence is the rather small sampling when
compared to quantitative methods. The exploratory and explanatory character of qualitative
research becomes apparent through the flexibility of the approach, the personal involvement, and
the openness of the researcher to the research subjects and the research process. However,
according to Mayring (1990, p. 17) this does not imply that the research process is not controlled
and does not follow well-grounded rules. Very important to the process are the illustration of the
context, the intersubjective traceability of the interpretation, and the relevance of the results.
Qualitative research explicitly turns itself against reliability and validity, the quality criteria that
apply for quantitative research. It has been often critiqued to be lacking scholarly rigor (Gioia,
Corley & Hamilton 2012), which makes it necessary to clearly state what quality criteria apply
for this kind of research. However, up to now there is no unambiguous agreement in the
scientific community about a criteria “catalogue” for qualitative research.
4. Summaries of Differences:
A comparison of quantitative and qualitative research can be carried out on various levels, e.g.
application domain, prerequisites, research process, etc. The main differences between the two
approaches come from their underlying science models. These models differ in their
understanding of how phenomena should be studied. The aim for objective and precise
prediction characterizes the natural science model (quantitative), whereas thick descriptions of
incidents that advance the understanding of human behaviour distinguish the human science
model (qualitative).
This fundamental difference implies the remaining ones. Due to its precise and seeking for
objectivity nature, quantitative research focuses on the quantification of concepts and their
relationships via measurement. In contrast, qualitative research tries to understand qualities of
entities via text production and interpretation. Quantitative researchers study phenomena with a
distant and objective science stance from the outside; whereas qualitative researchers are
engaged in face-to-face interactions and role taking from the inside. The deductive nature of
quantitative research implies a rather selective approach, where a small number of key variables
7. 7
across many data points are researched. Qualitative research aims at a holistic view of
phenomena and more often deploys an inductive, exploratory approach.
The last two differences refer to the research process and its impact on the segment of social
reality that is studies. Due to a pre-structured and linear research process, quantitative methods
allow for a static image of that segment. Qualitative methods follow a more flexible, open-ended
and circular process, so they enable a dynamic view of the segment. Despite these fundamental
differences, both methodologies can be successfully combined into one research design.
5. Mixed Method Approach:
When comparing quantitative and qualitative research, Wilson (1982) argues for a balanced use
of both, considering the object or phenomenon of research and not relying upon philosophical
doctrines. The increasing popularity of mixed methods could be due to many factors, one of
them being the intention of utilizing the strengths of both qualitative and quantitative research.
Also, the interdisciplinary nature of mixed methods can address the increasing complexity of
social reality. Moreover, the insights gained from the combination of both qualitative and
quantitative research provide a better and expanded understanding of the research subject.
Finally, it could also be argued that mixed methods help to better understand, explain, or build
on the results from quantitative and qualitative approaches. Before discussing the different types
of mixed methods designs, it is helpful to discuss the several aspects that influence the design of
procedures for mixed methods study. These are timing, weighting, and mixing strategies
(Cresswell, 2002).Timing refers to the order of data collection. Data could be collected
sequentially or concurrently. Weighting refers to where the priority is given in collection of data,
either quantitative or qualitative. The strategy of deciding the weighting also depends on the
extent of treatment of one type of data and the use of primarily an inductive or deductive
approach. Mixing refers to either that the qualitative and quantitative data are actually merged. It
is possible to merge data at several stages such as during the collection or while doing the
analysis or finally during the interpretation stage. The primary aim here is to collect one form of
data and have the other form of data provide supportive information.
8. 8
6. Differences betweenQualitative and Quantitative Inquiry
Qualitative Examples from the
tools tests
Quantitative Examples from the
tools tests
Lower number of
respondents
Hondurasand Mali,
approximately12
clientsperindividual
tool and 6 focusgroups
Higher number of
respondents
In Hondurasand Mali
between72and 96
respondentswere
includedinthe Impact
Survey.
Open-ended questions
and probing yield
detailed information
that illuminates
nuances and highlights
diversity
Loan Use Strategies
OverTime tool
demonstratesthe
diversityandcomplexity
of howclientsvarytheir
loanactivitiesovertime
Specific questions
obtain predetermined
responsesto
standardized questions
Impact surveyresults
reportedthe percentof
clientswhobelieved
theirenterprise income
had increasedinthe last
yearand whether
significantlymore
clientsthannon-clients
reportedincreases
Data collection
techniques vary
Focusgroup discussions
and in-depthindividual
interviews
Relies on surveys as
the main method of
data collection
Impact Surveyand
ClientExitSurvey
Control group not
required
In Hondurasand Mali,
onlyparticipants'views
obtained
Control or comparison
groups required to
determine program
impact
Comparisongroups
were composedof
incomingclientswho
had notyet received
program services
More focused
geographically (limited
use ofvehicles)
Specificlocations
identifiedforspecial
characteristics;for
example,urbanvs.
rural,vendorsvs.
manufacturers
More dispersed
geographically (more
use ofvehicles)
In Mali,three
categoriesof
communities(towns,
large villages,small
villages)withthree
categoriesof clients
(one-year,two-year,
and incoming)
More varied
techniques in data
analysis
Simple contentanalysis
isappliedwiththe Loan
Use Strategies Over
Time and Client
Empowermenttools,
witha focus
on grouping
Relies on standardized
data analysis.
Use of Epi Infosoftware
to reportdescriptive
statistics(prevalence
and means) andto test
for statistically
significantdifferences
betweensamplegroups
More suitable when
time and resources are
limited
Interviewstookone to
twohours to conduct,
but fewerwere done
Relies on more
extensive interviewing
Impact Surveytakes45-
60 minuteswitheach
clientanddone with
9. 9
large number;Client
ExitSurveytakes25
minutes
Empowering and
participatory
Asksfor participants'
reflectionontheir
experience
Not empowering Areasof inquiryare
predetermined
Sampling depends on
what needs to be
learned
Clientsselectedbykey
variables;forexample,
gender,time in
program,type of loan
obtained
Sampling focus is on
probability and
"representativeness"
whatneedsto be
learned
Clientsselectedbykey
Considerableeffortto
randomlyselectclients
withinstratified
samplestoensure
“representativeness”of
resultsand
comparabilityof sample
groups
Provides information
on the application of
the program in a
specific context to a
specific population
In Honduras,the Loan
Use StrategiesOver
Time tool highlighted
differencesbetween
individualandvillage
bankclients
More likely provides
information on the
broad application of
the program
In Mali,stratified
samplesclarified
differencesbetween
rural andurban areas,
but responsesalso
pooledforgeneral
comparisonto
nonclientgroup
Explores causality Generateshypotheses Suggests causality Testshypotheses
(Patton, 1990;Gosling and Edwards, 1995; CarvalhoandWhite,1997)
7. Differences betweenQualitative & Quantitative Research
10. 10
Qualitative Methods Quantitative Methods
Methods include focus groups, in-depth
interviews, and reviews of documents for
types of themes
Surveys, structured interviews &
observations, and reviews of records or
documents for numeric information
Primarily inductive process used to
formulate theory or hypotheses
Primarily deductive process used to test pre-
specified concepts, constructs, and
hypotheses that make up a theory
More subjective: describes a problem or
condition from the point of view of those
experiencing it
More objective: provides observed effects
(interpreted by researchers) of a program on
a problem or condition
Text-based Number-based
More in-depth information on a few cases Less in-depth but more breadth of
information across a large number of cases
Unstructured or semi-structured response
options
Fixed response options
No statistical tests Statistical tests are used for analysis
Can be valid and reliable: largely depends
on skill and rigor of the researcher
Can be valid and reliable: largely depends
on the measurement device or instrument
used
Time expenditure lighter on the planning
end and heavier during the analysis phase
Time expenditure heavier on the planning
phase and lighter on the analysis phase
Less generalizable More generalizable
11. 11
8. References:
Aliaga, M. & Gunderson, B. (2002). Interactive statistics. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five
Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage..
Creswell, J.W. (2002), Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method
approaches. Chapter 11: Mixed methods procedures, pp. 208-227
Flick, U. (2006), An introduction to qualitative research (3 ed.). Chapter 3: Qualitative
and quantitative research, pp 32-43, London: Sage.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K.G., Hamilton, A.L. (2012), Seeking Qualitative Rigor in
Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods,
vol. 16 (1), p.15-Hamel, J., Dufour, S. & Fortin, D. (1993), Case Study Methods. Sage
Publication, Newbury Park, California.
Hoffmann-Riem, C. (1980), Die Sozialforschung in einer interpretativen Soziologie - Der
Datengewinn. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, vol. 32, p.339-
372.
Mayring, Ph. (2002), Einführung in die Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Anleitung zum
qualitativen Denken (5. ed.), p. 9-18, München: Psychologie-Verlags-Union.
The book is well-suited for prospective researchers and introduces the background,
developments, and methods of qualitative social research.
Seipel, Ch. & Rieker, P. (2003), Integrative Sozialforschung. Konzepte und Methoden
der qualitativen und quantitativen empirischen Forschung. Weinheim/München: Juventa.
Wilson, T. P. (1982). Qualitative oder quantitative Methoden in der Sozialforschung.
Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, vol. 34, p. 487-508.
13. 13
Variables in Qualitative Research
By Isma Baig M.Phil Scholar
1 Concept:
What is Concept?
Expresses an abstraction formed by generalization from particulars.” (Kerlinger)
Examples:
Scientific: weight, mass, energy, force, etc.
Emotions: happiness, sadness, fear, anxiety, etc.
2 Constructs:
What is a construct?
“It has the added meaning, however, of having been deliberately and consciously invented or
adopted for a special scientific purpose.” (Kerlinger)
Examples:
Intelligence
Concept: used theoretically
Construct: “defined and specified [so] that it can be measured and observed” (Kerlinger)
3 Constant:
What is Constant?
The value of a constant remains the same (fixed) during the study.
Examples:
Numerical Value, Grade, etc.
14. 14
4 Themes:
What is Theme?
Theme is underlying meaning of the story.It is a universal Truth.
Example:
Significant Statements, Valuable Lesson, Central idea etc.
5 Variables:
•What is a variable?
“A variable is a symbol to which numerals or values are assigned.” (Kerlinger)
Variable: any characteristic that can vary across individuals, groups, or objects.
For Example:
Height / Weight
Profession
Grade-point average (GPA) OR Percentage
Level of interest
test score, etc
15. 15
6. Types of Variables:
Quantitative Variables:
A variable that can be measured numerically is called a Quantitative Variable. Quantitative
variables have further two types of variables that are given below:
Discrete Variable:
A variable whose values are countable is called a Discrete Variable. For Example: Number of
children, Family Size, Number of books, School Enrollment etc.
Continuous Variable:
A variable that can take on any of a continuously ordered set of values within some specified
range is called a Continuous Variable. For Example: Age, Experience, Motivation, and
Achievement
16. 16
Qualitative or/ Categorical Variable:
A variable that cannot assume a numerical value but can be classified into two or more
nonnumeric categories is called a Qualitative or/ Categorical Variable.
TYPES OF VARIABLES By Method
VARIABLES
Independent Dependent Confounding
Control Moderator
Intervening
Extraneous
Organismic
The independent variable:
It is the factor that is measured, manipulated or selected by the experimenter to determine its
relationship to an observed phenomenon. It is a stimulus variable or input operates within a
person or within his environment to effect behavior. Independent variable may be called factor
and its variation is called levels.
The dependent variable:
The dependent variable is a response variable or output. The dependent variable is the factor that
is observed and measured to determine the effect of the independent variable; it is the factor that
appears, disappears, or varies as the researcher introduces, removes, or varies the independent
variables.
17. 17
Moderate variable:
It is the factor that is measured, manipulated or selected by the experimenter to discover whether
it modifies the relationship of the independent variable to an observed phenomenon. The term
moderate variable describes a special type of independent variable, a secondary independent
variable selected to determine if it affects the relationship between the study’s primary
independent variable and its dependent variable.
Control variable:
Control variables are factors controlled by the experimenter to cancel out or neutralized any
effect they might otherwise on the observed phenomena. A single study can not examine all of
the variables in a situation (situational variable) or in a person (dispositional variable); some
must be neutralized to guarantee that they will not exert differential or moderating effects on the
relationship between the independent variables and dependent variables.
Intervening variable:
An intervening variable is the factor that theoretically effects observed phenomena but can not be
seen, measured, or manipulated; its effects must be inferred from the effects of the independent
and moderate variable on the observed phenomena.
Consider the hypothesis:
Among students of the same age and intelligence, skill performance is directly related to the
number of practice trials, the relationship being particularly strong among boys, but also holding,
though less directly, among girls’. this hypothesis that indicates that practice increases learning,
involve several variables.
Independent variable: ………..number of practice trail
Dependent variable:…………...skill performance
Control variable:……………… age, intelligence
19. 19
References:
Aliaga, M. & Gunderson, B. (2002). Interactive statistics. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five
Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage..
Creswell, J.W. (2002), Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method
approaches. Chapter 11: Mixed methods procedures, pp. 208-227
Flick, U. (2006), An introduction to qualitative research (3 ed.). Chapter 3: Qualitative and
quantitative research, pp 32-43, London: Sage.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K.G., Hamilton, A.L. (2012), Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive
Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, vol. 16 (1),
p.15-Hamel, J., Dufour, S. & Fortin, D. (1993), Case Study Methods. Sage Publication,
Newbury Park, California.
Hoffmann-Riem, C. (1980), Die Sozialforschung in einer interpretativen Soziologie - Der
Datengewinn. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, vol. 32, p.339-372.
Mayring, Ph. (2002), Einführung in die Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Anleitung zum
qualitativen Denken (5. ed.), p. 9-18, München: Psychologie-Verlags-Union.
The book is well-suited for prospective researchers and introduces the background,
developments, and methods of qualitative social research.
Seipel, Ch. & Rieker, P. (2003), Integrative Sozialforschung. Konzepte und Methoden der
qualitativen und quantitativen empirischen Forschung. Weinheim/München: Juventa.
Wilson, T. P. (1982). Qualitative oder quantitative Methoden in der Sozialforschung. Kölner
Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, vol. 34, p. 487-508.
http://www.zeepedia.com/read.php%3Fvariables_and_types_of_variables_moderating_varia
bles_research_methods%26b%3D71%26c%3D6
http://kevnull.com/presentations/iasummit2006/Communicating%20Concepts%20Through%
20Comics.pdf
http://Understanding Comics, Scott McCloud .com.pk