SlideShare a Scribd company logo
CT Cervical Spine
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
OSR
Anatomy
The cervical spine is the upper part of the spine extending from
the skull base to the thorax.
It normally consists of seven vertebrae.
Its main function is to support the skull and maintain the relative
positions of the brain and spinal cord.
The normal cervical spine is curved - convex in front and concave
at the back (cervical lordosis)
Of the seven cervical vertebrae, C1 (atlas) and C2 (axis) have very
distinct anatomical features and are called atypical vertebra.
C3 through C6 have typical anatomy (typical vertebra), while C7
looks very similar.
Gross anatomy (typical vertebra)
• Small, oval-sized vertebral bodies
• Relatively wide vertebral arch with large vertebral foramen
• Relatively long, bifid (except for C7) inferiorly pointing spinous
processes
• Transverse foramina protecting the vertebral arteries and veins
Anterior components of the typical cervical vertebra :
•Body
•Pedicle
•Tranverse process
•Inferior articular process
Posterior components of the typical cervical vertebra :
•Lamina
•Bifid spinous process
•Superior articular process
•Inferior articular process
First cervical vertebra C1- Atlas.
 It is an atypical cervical vertebra with unique features.
 It articulates with the dens of the axis and the occiput
 The atlas is composed of an anterior arch and a posterior arch,
paired lateral masses, and paired transverse processes.
 It has the dens of the axis sit where a centrum (body) of a typical
vertebra would be.
 The transverse ligament holds the dens of the axis against the
anterior arch of the atlas and divides its vertebral canal into two
parts.
 The anterior 1/3 is occupied by the dens. The posterior 2/3
contains the spinal cord
Second cervical vertebra C2- Axis
It is an atypical cervical vertebra with unique features and important
relations that make it easily recognisable.
Its most prominent feature is the odontoid process, which is
embryologically the body of the atlas (C1) .
It plays an important role in rotation of the head with the majority of
movement occurring around the dens and at the atlanto-axial joint.
Indications for CT cervical spine
The most common indication for CT C-spine is suspicion of C-spine
trauma in case of MVA.
Other indications
 Persistent pain or radiculopathy, with > 6 weeks of conservative
therapy and inadequate response to treatment
 New or progressive neurologic symptoms or deficits, e.g. motor
or sensory loss attributable to cervical pathology.
 Fracture evaluation for suspected or known fracture
Injuries related to C1 vertebra
Craniocervical Dissociation.
i. Atlanto-occipital dissociation injuries
ii. Atlanto-axial subluxation
Occipital Condyle Injuries.
Fractures of the Atlas.
i. Type I: isolated posterior arch fracture
ii. Type II: isolated anterior arch fracture
iii. Type III (Jefferson fracture): anterior and posterior
arch fractures
iv. Type IV: comminuted lateral mass fracture
Atlanto-occipital dissociation injuries are severe and include both
atlanto-occipital dislocations and atlanto-occipital subluxations.
The key to the diagnosis, in addition to visualising gross disruption of
the normal alignment of the atlanto-occipital joint, hinges on using a
number of lines.
1. Basion-dens interval (BDI) >10 mm in adults
2. Basion-axial interval (BAI) >12 mm in adults
3. Powers ratio >1 (insensitive to a vertical distraction injury or
posterior dissociation)
4. Atlantodental interval (ADI)
>3 mm in adult males
>2.5 mm in adult females
Normal intervals of the
craniocervical junction.
Midsagittal half-space volume-
rendered CT image shows the
Atlantodental interval (solid line),
Basion-dens interval (double-
headed arrow),
Posterior axial line (dashed line),
Basion-to–posterior axial line
interval (dotted line),
C1–C2 spinolaminar distance
(parallel lines).
Volume-rendered CT image
shows the normal relationship of
an occipital condyle and the
lateral mass of C1, with close
apposition, and the nearly
equidistant intervals (solid lines)
along all points in the midsagittal
plane of the joint.
Volume-rendered CT image of a
patient with atlanto-occipital
dissociation after an MVC shows
The “V sign” of cranially divergent
predental lines (solid lines),
A widened basion-dens interval
(double-headed arrow),
The posterior axial line (dashed
line),
A widened basion-to–posterior axial
line interval (dotted line),
And a widened C1–C2 spinolaminar
interval (parallel lines).
(c) Coronal volume-rendered CT image of a 26-year-old man with craniocervical
distraction after a motorcycle collision shows bilateral widening of the atlanto-occipital
joints (AO) and the atlantoaxial joints (AA).
(d) Volume-rendered CT image of a 23-year-old man with craniocervical distraction after
a motorcycle collision shows the occipital condyles (OC) dissociated from the lateral
masses of the atlas and shifted anteriorly.
Midsagittal volume-rendered CT image
of a 23-year-old man shows a marked
widening (solid lines) of the atlanto-
occipital articulation, with anterior
translation of the condyles and skull
base.
Atlanto-axial subluxation is a disorder of C1-C2 causing impairment in
rotation of the neck. It may be associated with dislocation of the
lateral mass of C1 on C2.
There are several ways in which a subluxation can occur:
Anteroposterior subluxation
Vertical subluxation
Lateral subluxation
Rotatory subluxation
Rotatory subluxation, known as atlantoaxial rotatory fixation
(AARF) is characterised into four different types :
Type I: the atlas is rotated on the odontoid with no anterior
displacement
Type II: the atlas is rotated on one lateral articular process with 3 to 5
mm of anterior displacement
Type III: comprises a rotation of the atlas on both lateral articular
processes with anterior displacement greater than 5 mm
Type IV: characterised by rotation and posterior displacement of the
atlas
Fielding and
Hawkins
classification of
atlantoaxial
rotatory
subluxation
Volume-rendered CT
image of a 45-year-old
patient after an MVC
shows a widened
atlantodental interval
(solid line) secondary to a
transverse ligament injury.
McRae line is a radiographic line drawn on a lateral skull radiograph
or midsagittal section of CT or MRI, joining the basion and opisthion.
Normal position of the tip of dens is 5mm below this line. If the tip
of the dens migrates above this line it indicates the presence of
basilar invagination (atlanto-axial impaction).
Chamberlain line is a line joining the back of hard palate with
the opisthion on a lateral view of the craniocervical junction.
It helps to recognise basilar invagination which is said to be
present if the tip of the dens is >3 mm above this line.
The digastric (or biventer) line has been described and used to
evaluate basilar invagination on coronal recontructed CT image.
The digastric line is drawn between right and left digastric grooves.
The tip of the odontoid process and atlanto-occipital joint normally
project 11 mm and 12 mm below this line respectively. Basilar
invagination is present when atlanto-occipital joint projects at or
above this line.
The bimastoid line has been described and used to evaluate
basilar invagination on frontal skull plain film and coronal
reconstructed CT image.
The bimastoid line is drawn between the inferior tips of the of
mastoid processes bilaterally. The tip of the odontoid process of
C2 normally projects less than or equal to 10 mm above this line.
Basilar invagination is present when the tip of the odontoid
process projects above 10 mm.
Occipital Condyle Fractures
Anderson and Montesano introduced the most widely used
radiologic classification system for occipital condyle fractures,
describing three different patterns of injury:
Type I: comminution impaction injury resulting from axial
loading with minimal or no fracture displacement- Stable
Type II: skull base fracture extending through the occipital
condyle- Stable
Type III: alar ligament avulsion fracture- Unstable
Fractures may be unilateral with minimal distraction, may be
bilateral, or may extend in a ring like configuration along the anterior
foramen magnum, with bilaterality increasing the likelihood of
instability.
Approximately 75% of occipital condyle fractures are type III injuries.
Occipital condyle fractures in
three patients. (a) Coronal
multiplanar reformatted CT
image of a 24-year-old man
after a motorcycle collision
shows a right type I condylar
fracture (arrows) resulting
from impaction of the condyle
against the right lateral mass
of C1.
(b) Off-axial MIP image of a 52-year-old man after an MVC shows a type II
right occipital condyle fracture associated with a skull base fracture (arrows).
(c) Coronal MIP image of an 18-year-old man with severe polytrauma after an
MVC shows an avulsion fragment off the right occipital condyle (type III
occipital condyle fracture).
Fractures of the Atlas
Atlas fractures account for 25% of craniocervical injuries. As many as
44% of atlas fractures have associated fractures of the axis.
Type I: Isolated posterior arches ----Stable
Type II: Isolated anterior arch ----Stable
Type III: Bilateral posterior arch with bilateral or unilateral anterior
arch (“Jefferson burst”)---- Stability Depends on integrity of
transverse ligament.
Type IV: Lateral mass ----Stable
Type V: Transversely oriented anterior arch fractures (avulsion of
longus colli or atlantoaxial ligament)
Fractures of the atlas in three patients. (a) Off-axial MIP image of a 27-year-old woman
after an MVC shows bilateral posterior arch fractures (TYPE 1) . Head rotation within the
physiologic range results in asymmetry of the lateral atlantodental intervals.
(b) Off-axial MIP image of a 49-year-old woman after an MVC shows a three-part
Jefferson fracture of the atlas (TYPE 3) . A congenital cleft (arrow) is incidentally
depicted anteriorly at the foramen transversarium. The cleft is distinguished from a
fracture by its smooth sclerotic appearance and because ring fractures should occur in
at least two parts.
(c) Off-axial MIP image of a 50-year-old
female pedestrian who was struck by a
motor vehicle shows unilateral fractures of
the left anterior and posterior arches, with
separation of the lateral mass (TYPE 4).
Injuries related to C2 vertebra
Hangman fracture
Odontoid fracture
Hangman fracture, also known as traumatic spondylolisthesis of the
axis, is a fracture which involves the pars interarticularis of C2 on
both sides, and is a result of hyperextension and distraction.
Levine and Edwards classification is used to classify hangman
fractures of C2.
Type I: fracture with <3 mm antero-posterior deviation
no angular deviation
Type II: fracture with >3 mm antero-posterior deviation
significant angular deviation
disruption of posterior longitudinal ligament
Type IIa: the fracture line is horizontal/oblique (instead of vertical)
significant angular deviation without anterior translation
Type III: type I with bilateral facet joint dislocation
Hangman fracture (a) Off-axial MIP image of an 18-year-old patient after a fall from
an all-terrain vehicle shows a type I hangman fracture with bilateral fractures of the
pars interarticularis.
(b) Sagittal half-space slab volume-rendered CT image of an 18-year-old patient
(same patient as in a) shows no translation or angulation of C2.
Hangman fracture
(c) Sagittal volume-rendered CT image of a 27-year-old woman with a type II
hangman fracture after an MVC shows anterior translation and angulation of C2. The
patient also had bilateral posterior arch fractures from hyperextension.
(d) Off-axial MIP image of a 62-year-old woman with an atypical type II hangman
fracture after an MVC shows a pars fracture on the right and an oblique fracture
through the posterolateral vertebral body.
(f) Sagittal volume-rendered CT image
of a 26-year-old woman with a type IIa
hangman fracture after an MVC shows
a pars interarticularis fracture with
anterior angulation of the body of C2
but no anterior translation.
Sagittal volume-rendered CT
image of a 30-year-old
woman with a type III
hangman fracture after an
MVC shows marked anterior
translation of C2 with facet
fracture-dislocation.
Nonodontoid nonhangman fracture.
Coronal MIP image of a 73-year-old
man after an MVC shows a
nonodontoid nonhangman fracture
involving the right lateral mass of C2.
Odontoid process fracture
Also known as the peg or dens fracture, occurs where there is a
fracture through the odontoid process of C2.
The Anderson and D'Alonzo classification is the most commonly
used classification of fractures of the odontoid process of C2.
Type I
Rare
Fracture of the upper part of the odontoid peg
Above the level of the transverse band of the cruciform ligament
Usually considered stable
Type II
Most common
Fracture at the base of the odontoid
Below the level of the transverse band of the cruciform ligament
Unstable
High risk of non-union
Type III
Through the odontoid and into the lateral masses of C2
Relatively stable if not excessively displaced
Best prognosis for healing because of the larger surface area of the
fracture
(a)Coronal multiplanar reformatted CT image of a 51-year-old man after a
motorcycle collision shows an oblique fracture of the odontoid tip (type
I odontoid fracture).
(b) Coronal volume-rendered CT image of a 24-year-old patient after a
rollover MVC shows a type II odontoid fracture.
(c) Sagittal MIP image of an 86-year-old patient after a fall from standing
shows a type IIa odontoid fracture with posterior displacement, posterior
angulation, and comminution.
(d) Coronal multiplanar reformatted CT image of a 78-year-old patient
involved in an MVC shows a type III dens fracture (arrows).
Variants
Os odontoideum
Persistent ossiculum terminale
Os odontoideum is an anatomic variant of the odontoid
process of C2 and needs to be differentiated from persistent
ossiculum terminale and from a type 2 odontoid fracture.
It can be associated with atlantoaxial instability.
Although it was originally thought to be a congenital lesion due to a
failure of the centre of ossification of the dens to fuse with the body
of C2, it may actually represent an unremembered and/or
unrecognised fracture through the dens growth plate before the age
of 5 or 6.
There may be associated instability and chronic symptoms.
Ossiculum terminale appears as a secondary ossification
centre of the dens between 3-6 years and normally fuses by 12
years.
Failure of fusion results in a persistent ossiculum terminale and is
considered a normal anatomical variant of the axis.
It lies above the transverse alar ligament and is therefore
considered to be stable and it very rarely causes symptoms.
Coronal bone window CT image
shows
Ossiculum terminale
Injuries of the Subaxial Cervical Spine
Subaxial injuries account for 65% of cervical spine fractures and
75% of dislocations .
Two scoring systems have been developed that specifically
incorporate multidetector CT for sub axial injuries:
1.The cervical spine Subaxial Injury Classification and Scoring
(SLIC) system.
2.The cervical spine injury severity score.
(SLIC system is more acceptable and easy)
The SLIC system, which was introduced in 2007 by Vaccaro et al
The SLIC system is made up of three separately graded
components, each representing major independent predictors of
outcome.
The three components of SLIC are
(a) Morphologic findings of bone spinal column disruption,
(b) The integrity of the discoligamentous complex, and
(c) Neurologic status.
The three scores for these three components are summed to give
the SLIC score (total score). Combined scores of 5 or more
indicate the need for surgical intervention. Injuries with scores of
3 or less can be managed without surgery, and scores of 4 are
indeterminate
SLIC Morphology Score
The SLIC morphology score describes the structural integrity and
relationships of vertebrae at an injured motion segment, with higher
scores corresponding with worse outcomes and an increased need
for surgery.
Morphology can be characterized with CT alone, and complete
discoligamentous injury can also usually be diagnosed with a high
degree of specificity in more-severe cases.
Compression (Score of 1) and Burst (Score of 2).—
Compression and burst fractures are characterized by loss of
vertebral body height without evidence of distraction or translation,
regardless of whether focal kyphosis is present.
Compression burst fracture.
Sagittal half-space slab
volume-rendered CT image of
a 23-year-old man after an
MVC shows a burst fracture of
C7 without associated facet
distraction.
Distraction (Score of 3)
Distractive injuries of the subaxial cervical spine are characterized by
dissociation in the vertical axis. Distraction may occur anteriorly as a
result of hyperextension or posteriorly from hyperflexion.
Hyperflexion injuries range from facet subluxation, with decreased
apposition or diastasis of the articular surfaces.
Facets are considered subluxated when there is less than 50%
overlap of the articular surfaces or more than 2 mm of diastasis.
Associated findings include
(a)posterior disk space widening with angulation greater than 11° and
(b) focal kyphotic deformity.
Flexion-distraction injuries in two patients. (a) Oblique volume-rendered CT
image of a 39-year-old woman after an MVC shows bilateral C5-C6 facet
distraction (arrows).
(b) Sagittal volume-rendered CT image of a 39-year-old woman (same
patient as in a) shows C5-C6 kyphotic angulation and posterior disk space
widening.
(c) Sagittal volume-rendered CT image of a 43-year-old woman who fell a
short distance and landed on her head shows perched facets (arrow) at C5-
C6, with focal kyphotic deformity.
(d) Oblique volume-rendered CT image of a 43-year-old woman (same patient
as in c) shows interspinous widening (*) associated with the C5-C6 facet
perch (arrow).
Hyperextension—Extension-type distraction injury is synonymous
with the term hyperextension dislocation and results from
disruption of the anterior longitudinal ligament and intervertebral
disk.
These injuries manifest with “extension teardrop” fracture, an
avulsed fragment of the anterior inferior corner of the involved
vertebral body, in 65% of cases, most commonly at C2.
Extension teardrop fracture is characteristically a thin fracture
fragment greater in the horizontal than the vertical dimension, is
often associated with anterior disk space widening.
Other stigmata of hyperextension injury such as facial trauma and
compression fractures of the facets, laminae, and spinous processes
may be seen
Extension-distraction injury.
Sagittal multiplanar
reformatted CT image of a 61-
year-old patient after a fall
from standing shows a
“hyperextension teardrop”
fracture (arrow) off the anterior
inferior lip of C2, with
associated posterior spinous
process fractures of C6-T1.
Translation or Rotation (Score of 4)—
Translation or rotation is demonstrated by vertebral offset in the
horizontal axis and may occur with or without fracture.
A pure translation of one vertebra relative to another may occur
when discoligamentous structures are disrupted bilaterally, or
rotation may occur when an intact facet serves as a pivot point.
Translation or rotation injuries can result from unilateral or
bilateral facet dislocations or fracture-dislocations.
A horizontal distance of 3.5 mm between the posterior aspects of
the rostral and caudal vertebral body at any given motion segment
is used as a cutoff for translational injury .
Unilateral locked facets usually cause less than 50% anterior
translation of the rostral vertebral body, whereas bilateral facet
dislocations result in 50% or more translation.
Translation injuries. (a) Coronal
posterior volume-rendered CT
image of an 85-year-old patient
after an MVC shows bilateral
locked facets (arrows) at C5-
C6.
(b) Sagittal volume-rendered CT
image of a 24-year-old patient who
was an unrestrained backseat
passenger in an MVC shows locked
facets at C5 (white arrow) on C6 (black
arrow), with greater than 50%
translation of the C5 vertebral body.
Translation injuries: Rotation-translation injury in a 61-year-old patient who was an
unrestrained driver in an MVC. (a) Axial MIP image shows left C6 pedicle and laminar
fractures (arrows), with separation of the lateral mass (*). (b) Multiplanar reformatted CT
image through the midsagittal plane of the spine below the injured segment shows off-
center spinous processes of C2 through C6 (arrow). (c) Sagittal half-space slab volume-
rendered CT image shows less than 50% anterior translation of the C6 vertebral body,
with rotated vertebral bodies at and above the injured level (arrow).
Translation injuries: flexion teardrop
injury in a 27-year-old woman who
was a victim of assault. (a) Sagittal
half-space slab volume-rendered CT
image shows the flexion teardrop
injury pattern, with the classic findings
of a triangular fragment (arrow) off the
anterior inferior C6 vertebral body and
posterior translation of the vertebral
body and posterior elements, resulting
in facet widening (*).
(b) Axial MIP image shows a sagittal
fracture line (arrow) through the C6
vertebral body posterior to the teardrop
fragment.
SLIC Discoligamentous Complex Score
The term discoligamentous complex refers to
(a) The anterior longitudinal ligament, intervertebral disk, and
posterior longitudinal ligament anteriorly and
(b) The ligamentum flavum, facet capsules, interspinous ligament,
and supraspinous ligament posteriorly.
Abnormal bone relationships at CT are the primary way that
discoligamentous complex injuries are diagnosed initially.
SLIC Neurology Score
Clay-shoveler fracture
Clay-shoveler fractures are fractures of the spinous process of a
lower cervical vertebra.
Often these injuries are unrecognised at the time and only found
incidentally years later when the cervical spine is imaged for other
reasons.
Acutely they tend to be associated with :
Motor vehicle accidents
Sudden muscle contraction
Direct blows to the spine
Sagittal CT image of a patient
with neck pain after lifting a
heavy object.
Shows fracture of spinous
process of C7 vertebra.
Vertebral Anomalies
Hemivertebra
Hemivertebra is a type of vertebral anomaly and results from a lack of
formation of one half of a vertebral body. It is a common cause of congenital
scoliosis.
It falls under the spectrum of segmentation anomalies and can involve one or
multiple levels.
A hemivertebra acts as a wedge within the vertebral column, resulting in
curvature away from the side on which it is present.
Types of hemivertebra
On the basis of attachment
•Fully segmental (free)
• not attached to either vertebra above or below
• most concerning
•Semi segmental: half segment is fused with vertebra above or below with no
intervening intervertebral disc
•Non segemental
• not separated from (i.e. connected to) either level above or below
• causes less of a concern
•Incarcerated
• joined by pedicles to levels above and below
• causes less of a concern
On the basis of orientation
1. Dorsal hemivertebra: classically results in kyphosis
2. Lateral hemivertebra: classically results in scoliosis
3. Ventral hemivertebra (extremely rare): results in lordosis
This case shows a semi-segmental
left thoracic hemivertebra.
Block vertebra
Block vertebra is a type of vertebral anomaly where there is a failure
of separation of two or more adjacent vertebral bodies.
1. Combined vertebrae may be of normal height, short, or tall
2. Disc space is frequently rudimentary or absent
3. The "wasp-waist sign" is seen in congenital block vertebra
CT scan revealed block vertebra on C5 and
C6 vertebral level (arrowheads)
Butterfly vertebra
Butterfly vertebra is a type of vertebral anomaly that results from the
failure of fusion of the lateral halves of the vertebral body because of
persistent notochordal tissue between them.
There is widening of the affected vertebral body. The bodies above
and below the butterfly vertebra adapt to the altered intervertebral
discs on either side by showing concavities along the adjacent
endplates.
Some bone bridging may occur across the defect which usually
happens in the thoracic or lumbar segments of the spine.
Arcuate foramen
The arcuate foramen (foramen arcuale atlantis, ponticulus posticus or
posterior ponticle, or Kimerle anomaly) is a frequently encountered
normal variant of the atlas.
It develops by calcification of the posterior atlanto-occipital
membrane. The atlantic portion (V3) of the vertebral arteries pass
through this foramen.
Incidence is ~8% (range 1-15%) and it is more common in females. It
has a variable morphology, can be complete or incomplete and may
be unilateral or bilateral.
The arcuate foramen is contained within the circle annotation.
Other Conditions involving Cervical Spine
Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is typically an entity
seen in patients of Asian descent, although it is seen in all ethnic groups.
Location
cervical: 75%
thoracic: 15%
lumbar: 10%
Types of OPLL
type 1 : continuous (ossification of several vertebral segments)
type 2 : segmental (several segments are affected, ossification is disrupted)
type 3 : mixed (mix of 1 and 2)
type 4 : localised (circumscribed, only one or two segments)
Sagittal bone window CT showing OPLL
Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis
Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), also referred to as Forestier
disease, is a common condition characterised by bony proliferation at sites of
tendinous and ligamentous insertion of the spine affecting elderly individuals.
On imaging, it is typically characterised by the flowing ossification of the anterior
longitudinal ligament , The cervical and thoracic spines, in particular, are
affected.
DISH most commonly affects the elderly, especially 6th to 7th decades.
Imaging:- Florid, flowing ossification is noted along the anterior or anterolateral
aspects of at least four contiguous vertebrae, so-called flowing ossifications
Disc spaces are usually well preserved
Ankylosis is more commonly seen in the thoracic than in the cervical or lumbar
spine.
There is calcification of anterior longitudinal ligament resulting in an irregular melting candle
wax like calcified mass anterior to the C3 to T4 vertebrae, with normal appearing intervertebral
disc spaces.
Rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune multisystemic
inflammatory disease which affects many organs but predominantly attacks
the synovial tissues and joints.
The cervical spine is frequently involved in RA ( in approximately 50% of
patients), whereas a thoracic and lumbar involvement are rare. Findings
include:
1. Erosion of the dens
2. Atlantoaxial subluxation
3. Atlantoaxial impaction (cranial settling): cephalad migration of C2
4. Erosion and fusion of uncovertebral (apophyseal joints ) and facet joints
5. Osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures
6. Erosion of spinous processes
Sagittal bone window CT image shows Severe degenerative change at the atlanto-dens
articulation with erosions.
Limitations of Multidetector CT
Although multidetector CT is often sufficient for making the binary
determination of whether surgery is necessary or not, important
determinants of management, including disk herniations,
ligamentum flavum infolding, cord swelling, contusion or
hemorrhage, and epidural hematoma, are not well evaluated with
CT but are clearly depicted at MR imaging.
CT Cervical Spine

More Related Content

What's hot

ANATOMY OF MRI SPINE
ANATOMY OF MRI SPINEANATOMY OF MRI SPINE
ANATOMY OF MRI SPINE
Kanhu Charan
 
Perfusion MRI (DSC and DCE perfusion techniques) for radiology residents
Perfusion MRI (DSC and DCE perfusion techniques) for radiology residentsPerfusion MRI (DSC and DCE perfusion techniques) for radiology residents
Perfusion MRI (DSC and DCE perfusion techniques) for radiology residents
Riham Dessouky
 
Normal Anatomy of Buccal mucosa and cancer
 Normal Anatomy of  Buccal mucosa and cancer Normal Anatomy of  Buccal mucosa and cancer
Normal Anatomy of Buccal mucosa and cancer
Kanhu Charan
 
Imaging of spinal trauma
Imaging of spinal traumaImaging of spinal trauma
Imaging of spinal traumaVishal Sankpal
 
Presentation2.pptx wrist joint.
Presentation2.pptx wrist joint.Presentation2.pptx wrist joint.
Presentation2.pptx wrist joint.Abdellah Nazeer
 
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the shoulder joint.
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the shoulder joint.Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the shoulder joint.
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the shoulder joint.
Abdellah Nazeer
 
X ray c-spine
X ray c-spine X ray c-spine
X ray c-spine
Rajaoct
 
Spine radiography
Spine radiographySpine radiography
Spine radiography
Dr. Muhammad Bin Zulfiqar
 
MRI KNEE JOINT ANATOMY
MRI KNEE JOINT ANATOMYMRI KNEE JOINT ANATOMY
MRI KNEE JOINT ANATOMY
Nikhil Bansal
 
Imaging in Skull base
Imaging in Skull baseImaging in Skull base
Imaging in Skull base
Rakesh Ca
 
Imaging neurology spotters
Imaging   neurology spottersImaging   neurology spotters
Imaging neurology spotters
NeurologyKota
 
MRI of the shoulder
MRI of the shoulderMRI of the shoulder
MRI of the shoulder
Thorsang Chayovan
 
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the chest.
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the chest.Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the chest.
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the chest.Abdellah Nazeer
 
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the neck.
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the neck.Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the neck.
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the neck.Abdellah Nazeer
 
cvj radiology BY DR GAURAV CHAUHAN
cvj radiology BY DR GAURAV CHAUHANcvj radiology BY DR GAURAV CHAUHAN
cvj radiology BY DR GAURAV CHAUHAN
Gaurav Chauhan
 
Radiological imaging of mediastinal masses
Radiological imaging of mediastinal massesRadiological imaging of mediastinal masses
Radiological imaging of mediastinal masses
Pankaj Kaira
 
Presentation1.pptx ankle joint..
Presentation1.pptx ankle joint..Presentation1.pptx ankle joint..
Presentation1.pptx ankle joint..Abdellah Nazeer
 
CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION ANATOMY, CRANIOMETRY, ANAMOLIES AND RADIOLOGY dr sum...
CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION ANATOMY, CRANIOMETRY, ANAMOLIES AND RADIOLOGY dr sum...CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION ANATOMY, CRANIOMETRY, ANAMOLIES AND RADIOLOGY dr sum...
CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION ANATOMY, CRANIOMETRY, ANAMOLIES AND RADIOLOGY dr sum...
SUMIT KUMAR
 
Larynx anatomy ct and mri
Larynx anatomy ct and mriLarynx anatomy ct and mri
Larynx anatomy ct and mri
Anish Choudhary
 

What's hot (20)

ANATOMY OF MRI SPINE
ANATOMY OF MRI SPINEANATOMY OF MRI SPINE
ANATOMY OF MRI SPINE
 
Perfusion MRI (DSC and DCE perfusion techniques) for radiology residents
Perfusion MRI (DSC and DCE perfusion techniques) for radiology residentsPerfusion MRI (DSC and DCE perfusion techniques) for radiology residents
Perfusion MRI (DSC and DCE perfusion techniques) for radiology residents
 
Normal Anatomy of Buccal mucosa and cancer
 Normal Anatomy of  Buccal mucosa and cancer Normal Anatomy of  Buccal mucosa and cancer
Normal Anatomy of Buccal mucosa and cancer
 
Imaging of spinal trauma
Imaging of spinal traumaImaging of spinal trauma
Imaging of spinal trauma
 
Presentation2.pptx wrist joint.
Presentation2.pptx wrist joint.Presentation2.pptx wrist joint.
Presentation2.pptx wrist joint.
 
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the shoulder joint.
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the shoulder joint.Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the shoulder joint.
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the shoulder joint.
 
X ray c-spine
X ray c-spine X ray c-spine
X ray c-spine
 
Spine radiography
Spine radiographySpine radiography
Spine radiography
 
MRI KNEE JOINT ANATOMY
MRI KNEE JOINT ANATOMYMRI KNEE JOINT ANATOMY
MRI KNEE JOINT ANATOMY
 
Imaging in Skull base
Imaging in Skull baseImaging in Skull base
Imaging in Skull base
 
Imaging neurology spotters
Imaging   neurology spottersImaging   neurology spotters
Imaging neurology spotters
 
MRI of the shoulder
MRI of the shoulderMRI of the shoulder
MRI of the shoulder
 
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the chest.
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the chest.Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the chest.
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the chest.
 
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the neck.
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the neck.Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the neck.
Presentation1.pptx, radiological anatomy of the neck.
 
cvj radiology BY DR GAURAV CHAUHAN
cvj radiology BY DR GAURAV CHAUHANcvj radiology BY DR GAURAV CHAUHAN
cvj radiology BY DR GAURAV CHAUHAN
 
Radiological imaging of mediastinal masses
Radiological imaging of mediastinal massesRadiological imaging of mediastinal masses
Radiological imaging of mediastinal masses
 
Presentation1.pptx ankle joint..
Presentation1.pptx ankle joint..Presentation1.pptx ankle joint..
Presentation1.pptx ankle joint..
 
CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION ANATOMY, CRANIOMETRY, ANAMOLIES AND RADIOLOGY dr sum...
CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION ANATOMY, CRANIOMETRY, ANAMOLIES AND RADIOLOGY dr sum...CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION ANATOMY, CRANIOMETRY, ANAMOLIES AND RADIOLOGY dr sum...
CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION ANATOMY, CRANIOMETRY, ANAMOLIES AND RADIOLOGY dr sum...
 
Knee mri
Knee mriKnee mri
Knee mri
 
Larynx anatomy ct and mri
Larynx anatomy ct and mriLarynx anatomy ct and mri
Larynx anatomy ct and mri
 

Similar to CT Cervical Spine

Ct spine fractures ppt
Ct spine fractures pptCt spine fractures ppt
Ct spine fractures ppt
BipulBorthakur
 
Cervical spine trauma
Cervical spine traumaCervical spine trauma
Cervical spine trauma
Dr. Soe Moe Htoo
 
Radiological Investigations of spinal Trauma.pptx
Radiological Investigations of spinal Trauma.pptxRadiological Investigations of spinal Trauma.pptx
Radiological Investigations of spinal Trauma.pptx
ssusere6b07d
 
26. acetabular fractures anatomy, evaluation and classification - muhammad...
26. acetabular fractures   anatomy, evaluation and classification  - muhammad...26. acetabular fractures   anatomy, evaluation and classification  - muhammad...
26. acetabular fractures anatomy, evaluation and classification - muhammad...
Muhammad Abdelghani
 
MRI in Tibial Fractures
MRI in Tibial FracturesMRI in Tibial Fractures
MRI in Tibial Fractures
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
CVJ.Ghty.24thoct2010.ppt sms medical college
CVJ.Ghty.24thoct2010.ppt sms medical collegeCVJ.Ghty.24thoct2010.ppt sms medical college
CVJ.Ghty.24thoct2010.ppt sms medical college
dineshdandia
 
Cervical spine fractures muhamma
Cervical spine fractures muhammaCervical spine fractures muhamma
Cervical spine fractures muhamma
Dr. Muhammad Bin Zulfiqar
 
Fracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdle
Fracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdleFracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdle
Fracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdle
omar ababneh
 
CVJ Anatomy
CVJ AnatomyCVJ Anatomy
CVJ Anatomy
heman4ss
 
Presentation1, artifact and pitfalls of the knee, hip and ankle joints.
Presentation1, artifact and pitfalls of the knee, hip and ankle joints.Presentation1, artifact and pitfalls of the knee, hip and ankle joints.
Presentation1, artifact and pitfalls of the knee, hip and ankle joints.
Abdellah Nazeer
 
Chapter 9-spine
Chapter 9-spineChapter 9-spine
Chapter 9-spineTran Dat
 
Imaging in Fractures and Dislocations-- An Introduction Dr. Muhammad Bin Zulf...
Imaging in Fractures and Dislocations-- An Introduction Dr. Muhammad Bin Zulf...Imaging in Fractures and Dislocations-- An Introduction Dr. Muhammad Bin Zulf...
Imaging in Fractures and Dislocations-- An Introduction Dr. Muhammad Bin Zulf...
Dr. Muhammad Bin Zulfiqar
 
MRI Knee trauma
MRI Knee traumaMRI Knee trauma
MRI Knee trauma
Dr. Mohit Goel
 
Mri knee trauma
Mri knee traumaMri knee trauma
Mri knee trauma
Anish Choudhary
 
Acetabular fracture
Acetabular fractureAcetabular fracture
Acetabular fracture
Harjot Gurudatta
 
SCI ABDALLAH.ppt
SCI ABDALLAH.pptSCI ABDALLAH.ppt
SCI ABDALLAH.ppt
JustineNDeodatus
 
Applied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spine
Applied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spineApplied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spine
Applied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spine
Kshitij Chaudhary
 
Acetabular fractures.ppt
Acetabular fractures.pptAcetabular fractures.ppt
Acetabular fractures.ppt
AryanSharma409632
 

Similar to CT Cervical Spine (20)

Ct spine fractures ppt
Ct spine fractures pptCt spine fractures ppt
Ct spine fractures ppt
 
Cervical spine trauma
Cervical spine traumaCervical spine trauma
Cervical spine trauma
 
Radiological Investigations of spinal Trauma.pptx
Radiological Investigations of spinal Trauma.pptxRadiological Investigations of spinal Trauma.pptx
Radiological Investigations of spinal Trauma.pptx
 
26. acetabular fractures anatomy, evaluation and classification - muhammad...
26. acetabular fractures   anatomy, evaluation and classification  - muhammad...26. acetabular fractures   anatomy, evaluation and classification  - muhammad...
26. acetabular fractures anatomy, evaluation and classification - muhammad...
 
MRI in Tibial Fractures
MRI in Tibial FracturesMRI in Tibial Fractures
MRI in Tibial Fractures
 
Cervical spine fractures muhamma
Cervical spine fractures muhammaCervical spine fractures muhamma
Cervical spine fractures muhamma
 
CVJ.Ghty.24thoct2010.ppt sms medical college
CVJ.Ghty.24thoct2010.ppt sms medical collegeCVJ.Ghty.24thoct2010.ppt sms medical college
CVJ.Ghty.24thoct2010.ppt sms medical college
 
Cervical spine fractures muhamma
Cervical spine fractures muhammaCervical spine fractures muhamma
Cervical spine fractures muhamma
 
Fracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdle
Fracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdleFracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdle
Fracture and dislocation of the shoulder girdle
 
CVJ Anatomy
CVJ AnatomyCVJ Anatomy
CVJ Anatomy
 
Presentation1, artifact and pitfalls of the knee, hip and ankle joints.
Presentation1, artifact and pitfalls of the knee, hip and ankle joints.Presentation1, artifact and pitfalls of the knee, hip and ankle joints.
Presentation1, artifact and pitfalls of the knee, hip and ankle joints.
 
Imaging in fractures
Imaging in fracturesImaging in fractures
Imaging in fractures
 
Chapter 9-spine
Chapter 9-spineChapter 9-spine
Chapter 9-spine
 
Imaging in Fractures and Dislocations-- An Introduction Dr. Muhammad Bin Zulf...
Imaging in Fractures and Dislocations-- An Introduction Dr. Muhammad Bin Zulf...Imaging in Fractures and Dislocations-- An Introduction Dr. Muhammad Bin Zulf...
Imaging in Fractures and Dislocations-- An Introduction Dr. Muhammad Bin Zulf...
 
MRI Knee trauma
MRI Knee traumaMRI Knee trauma
MRI Knee trauma
 
Mri knee trauma
Mri knee traumaMri knee trauma
Mri knee trauma
 
Acetabular fracture
Acetabular fractureAcetabular fracture
Acetabular fracture
 
SCI ABDALLAH.ppt
SCI ABDALLAH.pptSCI ABDALLAH.ppt
SCI ABDALLAH.ppt
 
Applied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spine
Applied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spineApplied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spine
Applied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spine
 
Acetabular fractures.ppt
Acetabular fractures.pptAcetabular fractures.ppt
Acetabular fractures.ppt
 

More from Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani

USG of Aorta and Coeliac axis
USG of Aorta and Coeliac axisUSG of Aorta and Coeliac axis
USG of Aorta and Coeliac axis
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
TACE- Transarterial Chemoembolisation
TACE- Transarterial Chemoembolisation TACE- Transarterial Chemoembolisation
TACE- Transarterial Chemoembolisation
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
Retrograde Pyelography
Retrograde PyelographyRetrograde Pyelography
Retrograde Pyelography
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
Imaging of Renal Tumors
Imaging of Renal TumorsImaging of Renal Tumors
Imaging of Renal Tumors
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
Renal isotope scan
Renal isotope scanRenal isotope scan
Renal isotope scan
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
Post Processing of CT Thorax
Post Processing of CT ThoraxPost Processing of CT Thorax
Post Processing of CT Thorax
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
Imaging of Obstructive jaundice
Imaging of Obstructive jaundiceImaging of Obstructive jaundice
Imaging of Obstructive jaundice
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
HIDA Scan
HIDA ScanHIDA Scan
MRI in CVA
MRI in CVAMRI in CVA
CT Urography
CT UrographyCT Urography
CT Imaging of CA Esophagus
CT Imaging of CA EsophagusCT Imaging of CA Esophagus
CT Imaging of CA Esophagus
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
CT - Lung Carcinoma
CT - Lung CarcinomaCT - Lung Carcinoma
CT - Lung Carcinoma
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
Biliary drainage
Biliary drainageBiliary drainage
Biliary drainage
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
Liver cirrhosis USG
Liver cirrhosis USGLiver cirrhosis USG
Liver cirrhosis USG
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
Basics of Renal Doppler
Basics of Renal DopplerBasics of Renal Doppler
Basics of Renal Doppler
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
Renal Angiography
Renal AngiographyRenal Angiography
Renal Angiography
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
Imaging of Large Bowel Polyp
Imaging of Large Bowel PolypImaging of Large Bowel Polyp
Imaging of Large Bowel Polyp
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
Esophageal stent
Esophageal stentEsophageal stent
Esophageal stent
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 
CTV and MRV
CTV and MRVCTV and MRV
CT Pulmonary Angiography
CT Pulmonary AngiographyCT Pulmonary Angiography
CT Pulmonary Angiography
Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani
 

More from Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani (20)

USG of Aorta and Coeliac axis
USG of Aorta and Coeliac axisUSG of Aorta and Coeliac axis
USG of Aorta and Coeliac axis
 
TACE- Transarterial Chemoembolisation
TACE- Transarterial Chemoembolisation TACE- Transarterial Chemoembolisation
TACE- Transarterial Chemoembolisation
 
Retrograde Pyelography
Retrograde PyelographyRetrograde Pyelography
Retrograde Pyelography
 
Imaging of Renal Tumors
Imaging of Renal TumorsImaging of Renal Tumors
Imaging of Renal Tumors
 
Renal isotope scan
Renal isotope scanRenal isotope scan
Renal isotope scan
 
Post Processing of CT Thorax
Post Processing of CT ThoraxPost Processing of CT Thorax
Post Processing of CT Thorax
 
Imaging of Obstructive jaundice
Imaging of Obstructive jaundiceImaging of Obstructive jaundice
Imaging of Obstructive jaundice
 
HIDA Scan
HIDA ScanHIDA Scan
HIDA Scan
 
MRI in CVA
MRI in CVAMRI in CVA
MRI in CVA
 
CT Urography
CT UrographyCT Urography
CT Urography
 
CT Imaging of CA Esophagus
CT Imaging of CA EsophagusCT Imaging of CA Esophagus
CT Imaging of CA Esophagus
 
CT - Lung Carcinoma
CT - Lung CarcinomaCT - Lung Carcinoma
CT - Lung Carcinoma
 
Biliary drainage
Biliary drainageBiliary drainage
Biliary drainage
 
Liver cirrhosis USG
Liver cirrhosis USGLiver cirrhosis USG
Liver cirrhosis USG
 
Basics of Renal Doppler
Basics of Renal DopplerBasics of Renal Doppler
Basics of Renal Doppler
 
Renal Angiography
Renal AngiographyRenal Angiography
Renal Angiography
 
Imaging of Large Bowel Polyp
Imaging of Large Bowel PolypImaging of Large Bowel Polyp
Imaging of Large Bowel Polyp
 
Esophageal stent
Esophageal stentEsophageal stent
Esophageal stent
 
CTV and MRV
CTV and MRVCTV and MRV
CTV and MRV
 
CT Pulmonary Angiography
CT Pulmonary AngiographyCT Pulmonary Angiography
CT Pulmonary Angiography
 

Recently uploaded

2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
Sandy Millin
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
TechSoup
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
beazzy04
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
EugeneSaldivar
 
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9  .docxAcetabularia Information For Class 9  .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
vaibhavrinwa19
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
MIRIAMSALINAS13
 
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
Levi Shapiro
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
Jisc
 
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptxThe Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
DhatriParmar
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup
 
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
Jisc
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
siemaillard
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
EverAndrsGuerraGuerr
 
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdfAdversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Po-Chuan Chen
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
Special education needs
 
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxFrancesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
EduSkills OECD
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Mohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Balvir Singh
 
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkIntroduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
TechSoup
 

Recently uploaded (20)

2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
 
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9  .docxAcetabularia Information For Class 9  .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
 
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptxThe Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
 
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
 
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdfAdversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
 
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxFrancesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
 
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkIntroduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
 

CT Cervical Spine

  • 1. CT Cervical Spine Dr. Yash Kumar Achantani OSR
  • 2. Anatomy The cervical spine is the upper part of the spine extending from the skull base to the thorax. It normally consists of seven vertebrae. Its main function is to support the skull and maintain the relative positions of the brain and spinal cord. The normal cervical spine is curved - convex in front and concave at the back (cervical lordosis)
  • 3. Of the seven cervical vertebrae, C1 (atlas) and C2 (axis) have very distinct anatomical features and are called atypical vertebra. C3 through C6 have typical anatomy (typical vertebra), while C7 looks very similar. Gross anatomy (typical vertebra) • Small, oval-sized vertebral bodies • Relatively wide vertebral arch with large vertebral foramen • Relatively long, bifid (except for C7) inferiorly pointing spinous processes • Transverse foramina protecting the vertebral arteries and veins
  • 4. Anterior components of the typical cervical vertebra : •Body •Pedicle •Tranverse process •Inferior articular process
  • 5. Posterior components of the typical cervical vertebra : •Lamina •Bifid spinous process •Superior articular process •Inferior articular process
  • 6.
  • 7. First cervical vertebra C1- Atlas.  It is an atypical cervical vertebra with unique features.  It articulates with the dens of the axis and the occiput  The atlas is composed of an anterior arch and a posterior arch, paired lateral masses, and paired transverse processes.  It has the dens of the axis sit where a centrum (body) of a typical vertebra would be.  The transverse ligament holds the dens of the axis against the anterior arch of the atlas and divides its vertebral canal into two parts.  The anterior 1/3 is occupied by the dens. The posterior 2/3 contains the spinal cord
  • 8.
  • 9. Second cervical vertebra C2- Axis It is an atypical cervical vertebra with unique features and important relations that make it easily recognisable. Its most prominent feature is the odontoid process, which is embryologically the body of the atlas (C1) . It plays an important role in rotation of the head with the majority of movement occurring around the dens and at the atlanto-axial joint.
  • 10.
  • 11. Indications for CT cervical spine The most common indication for CT C-spine is suspicion of C-spine trauma in case of MVA. Other indications  Persistent pain or radiculopathy, with > 6 weeks of conservative therapy and inadequate response to treatment  New or progressive neurologic symptoms or deficits, e.g. motor or sensory loss attributable to cervical pathology.  Fracture evaluation for suspected or known fracture
  • 12.
  • 13. Injuries related to C1 vertebra Craniocervical Dissociation. i. Atlanto-occipital dissociation injuries ii. Atlanto-axial subluxation Occipital Condyle Injuries. Fractures of the Atlas. i. Type I: isolated posterior arch fracture ii. Type II: isolated anterior arch fracture iii. Type III (Jefferson fracture): anterior and posterior arch fractures iv. Type IV: comminuted lateral mass fracture
  • 14. Atlanto-occipital dissociation injuries are severe and include both atlanto-occipital dislocations and atlanto-occipital subluxations. The key to the diagnosis, in addition to visualising gross disruption of the normal alignment of the atlanto-occipital joint, hinges on using a number of lines. 1. Basion-dens interval (BDI) >10 mm in adults 2. Basion-axial interval (BAI) >12 mm in adults 3. Powers ratio >1 (insensitive to a vertical distraction injury or posterior dissociation) 4. Atlantodental interval (ADI) >3 mm in adult males >2.5 mm in adult females
  • 15.
  • 16. Normal intervals of the craniocervical junction. Midsagittal half-space volume- rendered CT image shows the Atlantodental interval (solid line), Basion-dens interval (double- headed arrow), Posterior axial line (dashed line), Basion-to–posterior axial line interval (dotted line), C1–C2 spinolaminar distance (parallel lines).
  • 17. Volume-rendered CT image shows the normal relationship of an occipital condyle and the lateral mass of C1, with close apposition, and the nearly equidistant intervals (solid lines) along all points in the midsagittal plane of the joint.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22. Volume-rendered CT image of a patient with atlanto-occipital dissociation after an MVC shows The “V sign” of cranially divergent predental lines (solid lines), A widened basion-dens interval (double-headed arrow), The posterior axial line (dashed line), A widened basion-to–posterior axial line interval (dotted line), And a widened C1–C2 spinolaminar interval (parallel lines).
  • 23. (c) Coronal volume-rendered CT image of a 26-year-old man with craniocervical distraction after a motorcycle collision shows bilateral widening of the atlanto-occipital joints (AO) and the atlantoaxial joints (AA). (d) Volume-rendered CT image of a 23-year-old man with craniocervical distraction after a motorcycle collision shows the occipital condyles (OC) dissociated from the lateral masses of the atlas and shifted anteriorly.
  • 24. Midsagittal volume-rendered CT image of a 23-year-old man shows a marked widening (solid lines) of the atlanto- occipital articulation, with anterior translation of the condyles and skull base.
  • 25. Atlanto-axial subluxation is a disorder of C1-C2 causing impairment in rotation of the neck. It may be associated with dislocation of the lateral mass of C1 on C2. There are several ways in which a subluxation can occur: Anteroposterior subluxation Vertical subluxation Lateral subluxation Rotatory subluxation
  • 26. Rotatory subluxation, known as atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF) is characterised into four different types : Type I: the atlas is rotated on the odontoid with no anterior displacement Type II: the atlas is rotated on one lateral articular process with 3 to 5 mm of anterior displacement Type III: comprises a rotation of the atlas on both lateral articular processes with anterior displacement greater than 5 mm Type IV: characterised by rotation and posterior displacement of the atlas
  • 28. Volume-rendered CT image of a 45-year-old patient after an MVC shows a widened atlantodental interval (solid line) secondary to a transverse ligament injury.
  • 29. McRae line is a radiographic line drawn on a lateral skull radiograph or midsagittal section of CT or MRI, joining the basion and opisthion. Normal position of the tip of dens is 5mm below this line. If the tip of the dens migrates above this line it indicates the presence of basilar invagination (atlanto-axial impaction).
  • 30.
  • 31. Chamberlain line is a line joining the back of hard palate with the opisthion on a lateral view of the craniocervical junction. It helps to recognise basilar invagination which is said to be present if the tip of the dens is >3 mm above this line.
  • 32.
  • 33. The digastric (or biventer) line has been described and used to evaluate basilar invagination on coronal recontructed CT image. The digastric line is drawn between right and left digastric grooves. The tip of the odontoid process and atlanto-occipital joint normally project 11 mm and 12 mm below this line respectively. Basilar invagination is present when atlanto-occipital joint projects at or above this line.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36. The bimastoid line has been described and used to evaluate basilar invagination on frontal skull plain film and coronal reconstructed CT image. The bimastoid line is drawn between the inferior tips of the of mastoid processes bilaterally. The tip of the odontoid process of C2 normally projects less than or equal to 10 mm above this line. Basilar invagination is present when the tip of the odontoid process projects above 10 mm.
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39. Occipital Condyle Fractures Anderson and Montesano introduced the most widely used radiologic classification system for occipital condyle fractures, describing three different patterns of injury: Type I: comminution impaction injury resulting from axial loading with minimal or no fracture displacement- Stable Type II: skull base fracture extending through the occipital condyle- Stable Type III: alar ligament avulsion fracture- Unstable
  • 40. Fractures may be unilateral with minimal distraction, may be bilateral, or may extend in a ring like configuration along the anterior foramen magnum, with bilaterality increasing the likelihood of instability. Approximately 75% of occipital condyle fractures are type III injuries.
  • 41. Occipital condyle fractures in three patients. (a) Coronal multiplanar reformatted CT image of a 24-year-old man after a motorcycle collision shows a right type I condylar fracture (arrows) resulting from impaction of the condyle against the right lateral mass of C1.
  • 42. (b) Off-axial MIP image of a 52-year-old man after an MVC shows a type II right occipital condyle fracture associated with a skull base fracture (arrows). (c) Coronal MIP image of an 18-year-old man with severe polytrauma after an MVC shows an avulsion fragment off the right occipital condyle (type III occipital condyle fracture).
  • 43. Fractures of the Atlas Atlas fractures account for 25% of craniocervical injuries. As many as 44% of atlas fractures have associated fractures of the axis. Type I: Isolated posterior arches ----Stable Type II: Isolated anterior arch ----Stable
  • 44. Type III: Bilateral posterior arch with bilateral or unilateral anterior arch (“Jefferson burst”)---- Stability Depends on integrity of transverse ligament. Type IV: Lateral mass ----Stable Type V: Transversely oriented anterior arch fractures (avulsion of longus colli or atlantoaxial ligament)
  • 45. Fractures of the atlas in three patients. (a) Off-axial MIP image of a 27-year-old woman after an MVC shows bilateral posterior arch fractures (TYPE 1) . Head rotation within the physiologic range results in asymmetry of the lateral atlantodental intervals.
  • 46. (b) Off-axial MIP image of a 49-year-old woman after an MVC shows a three-part Jefferson fracture of the atlas (TYPE 3) . A congenital cleft (arrow) is incidentally depicted anteriorly at the foramen transversarium. The cleft is distinguished from a fracture by its smooth sclerotic appearance and because ring fractures should occur in at least two parts.
  • 47. (c) Off-axial MIP image of a 50-year-old female pedestrian who was struck by a motor vehicle shows unilateral fractures of the left anterior and posterior arches, with separation of the lateral mass (TYPE 4).
  • 48. Injuries related to C2 vertebra Hangman fracture Odontoid fracture
  • 49. Hangman fracture, also known as traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis, is a fracture which involves the pars interarticularis of C2 on both sides, and is a result of hyperextension and distraction. Levine and Edwards classification is used to classify hangman fractures of C2. Type I: fracture with <3 mm antero-posterior deviation no angular deviation Type II: fracture with >3 mm antero-posterior deviation significant angular deviation disruption of posterior longitudinal ligament Type IIa: the fracture line is horizontal/oblique (instead of vertical) significant angular deviation without anterior translation Type III: type I with bilateral facet joint dislocation
  • 50. Hangman fracture (a) Off-axial MIP image of an 18-year-old patient after a fall from an all-terrain vehicle shows a type I hangman fracture with bilateral fractures of the pars interarticularis. (b) Sagittal half-space slab volume-rendered CT image of an 18-year-old patient (same patient as in a) shows no translation or angulation of C2.
  • 51. Hangman fracture (c) Sagittal volume-rendered CT image of a 27-year-old woman with a type II hangman fracture after an MVC shows anterior translation and angulation of C2. The patient also had bilateral posterior arch fractures from hyperextension. (d) Off-axial MIP image of a 62-year-old woman with an atypical type II hangman fracture after an MVC shows a pars fracture on the right and an oblique fracture through the posterolateral vertebral body.
  • 52. (f) Sagittal volume-rendered CT image of a 26-year-old woman with a type IIa hangman fracture after an MVC shows a pars interarticularis fracture with anterior angulation of the body of C2 but no anterior translation.
  • 53. Sagittal volume-rendered CT image of a 30-year-old woman with a type III hangman fracture after an MVC shows marked anterior translation of C2 with facet fracture-dislocation.
  • 54. Nonodontoid nonhangman fracture. Coronal MIP image of a 73-year-old man after an MVC shows a nonodontoid nonhangman fracture involving the right lateral mass of C2.
  • 55. Odontoid process fracture Also known as the peg or dens fracture, occurs where there is a fracture through the odontoid process of C2. The Anderson and D'Alonzo classification is the most commonly used classification of fractures of the odontoid process of C2. Type I Rare Fracture of the upper part of the odontoid peg Above the level of the transverse band of the cruciform ligament Usually considered stable
  • 56. Type II Most common Fracture at the base of the odontoid Below the level of the transverse band of the cruciform ligament Unstable High risk of non-union Type III Through the odontoid and into the lateral masses of C2 Relatively stable if not excessively displaced Best prognosis for healing because of the larger surface area of the fracture
  • 57.
  • 58. (a)Coronal multiplanar reformatted CT image of a 51-year-old man after a motorcycle collision shows an oblique fracture of the odontoid tip (type I odontoid fracture). (b) Coronal volume-rendered CT image of a 24-year-old patient after a rollover MVC shows a type II odontoid fracture.
  • 59. (c) Sagittal MIP image of an 86-year-old patient after a fall from standing shows a type IIa odontoid fracture with posterior displacement, posterior angulation, and comminution. (d) Coronal multiplanar reformatted CT image of a 78-year-old patient involved in an MVC shows a type III dens fracture (arrows).
  • 61. Os odontoideum is an anatomic variant of the odontoid process of C2 and needs to be differentiated from persistent ossiculum terminale and from a type 2 odontoid fracture. It can be associated with atlantoaxial instability. Although it was originally thought to be a congenital lesion due to a failure of the centre of ossification of the dens to fuse with the body of C2, it may actually represent an unremembered and/or unrecognised fracture through the dens growth plate before the age of 5 or 6. There may be associated instability and chronic symptoms.
  • 62.
  • 63.
  • 64. Ossiculum terminale appears as a secondary ossification centre of the dens between 3-6 years and normally fuses by 12 years. Failure of fusion results in a persistent ossiculum terminale and is considered a normal anatomical variant of the axis. It lies above the transverse alar ligament and is therefore considered to be stable and it very rarely causes symptoms.
  • 65.
  • 66. Coronal bone window CT image shows Ossiculum terminale
  • 67. Injuries of the Subaxial Cervical Spine Subaxial injuries account for 65% of cervical spine fractures and 75% of dislocations . Two scoring systems have been developed that specifically incorporate multidetector CT for sub axial injuries: 1.The cervical spine Subaxial Injury Classification and Scoring (SLIC) system. 2.The cervical spine injury severity score. (SLIC system is more acceptable and easy)
  • 68. The SLIC system, which was introduced in 2007 by Vaccaro et al The SLIC system is made up of three separately graded components, each representing major independent predictors of outcome. The three components of SLIC are (a) Morphologic findings of bone spinal column disruption, (b) The integrity of the discoligamentous complex, and (c) Neurologic status. The three scores for these three components are summed to give the SLIC score (total score). Combined scores of 5 or more indicate the need for surgical intervention. Injuries with scores of 3 or less can be managed without surgery, and scores of 4 are indeterminate
  • 69. SLIC Morphology Score The SLIC morphology score describes the structural integrity and relationships of vertebrae at an injured motion segment, with higher scores corresponding with worse outcomes and an increased need for surgery. Morphology can be characterized with CT alone, and complete discoligamentous injury can also usually be diagnosed with a high degree of specificity in more-severe cases.
  • 70.
  • 71. Compression (Score of 1) and Burst (Score of 2).— Compression and burst fractures are characterized by loss of vertebral body height without evidence of distraction or translation, regardless of whether focal kyphosis is present.
  • 72. Compression burst fracture. Sagittal half-space slab volume-rendered CT image of a 23-year-old man after an MVC shows a burst fracture of C7 without associated facet distraction.
  • 73. Distraction (Score of 3) Distractive injuries of the subaxial cervical spine are characterized by dissociation in the vertical axis. Distraction may occur anteriorly as a result of hyperextension or posteriorly from hyperflexion. Hyperflexion injuries range from facet subluxation, with decreased apposition or diastasis of the articular surfaces. Facets are considered subluxated when there is less than 50% overlap of the articular surfaces or more than 2 mm of diastasis.
  • 74. Associated findings include (a)posterior disk space widening with angulation greater than 11° and (b) focal kyphotic deformity.
  • 75. Flexion-distraction injuries in two patients. (a) Oblique volume-rendered CT image of a 39-year-old woman after an MVC shows bilateral C5-C6 facet distraction (arrows). (b) Sagittal volume-rendered CT image of a 39-year-old woman (same patient as in a) shows C5-C6 kyphotic angulation and posterior disk space widening.
  • 76. (c) Sagittal volume-rendered CT image of a 43-year-old woman who fell a short distance and landed on her head shows perched facets (arrow) at C5- C6, with focal kyphotic deformity. (d) Oblique volume-rendered CT image of a 43-year-old woman (same patient as in c) shows interspinous widening (*) associated with the C5-C6 facet perch (arrow).
  • 77. Hyperextension—Extension-type distraction injury is synonymous with the term hyperextension dislocation and results from disruption of the anterior longitudinal ligament and intervertebral disk. These injuries manifest with “extension teardrop” fracture, an avulsed fragment of the anterior inferior corner of the involved vertebral body, in 65% of cases, most commonly at C2. Extension teardrop fracture is characteristically a thin fracture fragment greater in the horizontal than the vertical dimension, is often associated with anterior disk space widening. Other stigmata of hyperextension injury such as facial trauma and compression fractures of the facets, laminae, and spinous processes may be seen
  • 78. Extension-distraction injury. Sagittal multiplanar reformatted CT image of a 61- year-old patient after a fall from standing shows a “hyperextension teardrop” fracture (arrow) off the anterior inferior lip of C2, with associated posterior spinous process fractures of C6-T1.
  • 79. Translation or Rotation (Score of 4)— Translation or rotation is demonstrated by vertebral offset in the horizontal axis and may occur with or without fracture. A pure translation of one vertebra relative to another may occur when discoligamentous structures are disrupted bilaterally, or rotation may occur when an intact facet serves as a pivot point. Translation or rotation injuries can result from unilateral or bilateral facet dislocations or fracture-dislocations. A horizontal distance of 3.5 mm between the posterior aspects of the rostral and caudal vertebral body at any given motion segment is used as a cutoff for translational injury .
  • 80. Unilateral locked facets usually cause less than 50% anterior translation of the rostral vertebral body, whereas bilateral facet dislocations result in 50% or more translation.
  • 81. Translation injuries. (a) Coronal posterior volume-rendered CT image of an 85-year-old patient after an MVC shows bilateral locked facets (arrows) at C5- C6.
  • 82. (b) Sagittal volume-rendered CT image of a 24-year-old patient who was an unrestrained backseat passenger in an MVC shows locked facets at C5 (white arrow) on C6 (black arrow), with greater than 50% translation of the C5 vertebral body.
  • 83. Translation injuries: Rotation-translation injury in a 61-year-old patient who was an unrestrained driver in an MVC. (a) Axial MIP image shows left C6 pedicle and laminar fractures (arrows), with separation of the lateral mass (*). (b) Multiplanar reformatted CT image through the midsagittal plane of the spine below the injured segment shows off- center spinous processes of C2 through C6 (arrow). (c) Sagittal half-space slab volume- rendered CT image shows less than 50% anterior translation of the C6 vertebral body, with rotated vertebral bodies at and above the injured level (arrow).
  • 84. Translation injuries: flexion teardrop injury in a 27-year-old woman who was a victim of assault. (a) Sagittal half-space slab volume-rendered CT image shows the flexion teardrop injury pattern, with the classic findings of a triangular fragment (arrow) off the anterior inferior C6 vertebral body and posterior translation of the vertebral body and posterior elements, resulting in facet widening (*).
  • 85. (b) Axial MIP image shows a sagittal fracture line (arrow) through the C6 vertebral body posterior to the teardrop fragment.
  • 86. SLIC Discoligamentous Complex Score The term discoligamentous complex refers to (a) The anterior longitudinal ligament, intervertebral disk, and posterior longitudinal ligament anteriorly and (b) The ligamentum flavum, facet capsules, interspinous ligament, and supraspinous ligament posteriorly. Abnormal bone relationships at CT are the primary way that discoligamentous complex injuries are diagnosed initially.
  • 87.
  • 89.
  • 90. Clay-shoveler fracture Clay-shoveler fractures are fractures of the spinous process of a lower cervical vertebra. Often these injuries are unrecognised at the time and only found incidentally years later when the cervical spine is imaged for other reasons. Acutely they tend to be associated with : Motor vehicle accidents Sudden muscle contraction Direct blows to the spine
  • 91. Sagittal CT image of a patient with neck pain after lifting a heavy object. Shows fracture of spinous process of C7 vertebra.
  • 92.
  • 93.
  • 95. Hemivertebra Hemivertebra is a type of vertebral anomaly and results from a lack of formation of one half of a vertebral body. It is a common cause of congenital scoliosis. It falls under the spectrum of segmentation anomalies and can involve one or multiple levels. A hemivertebra acts as a wedge within the vertebral column, resulting in curvature away from the side on which it is present.
  • 96. Types of hemivertebra On the basis of attachment •Fully segmental (free) • not attached to either vertebra above or below • most concerning •Semi segmental: half segment is fused with vertebra above or below with no intervening intervertebral disc •Non segemental • not separated from (i.e. connected to) either level above or below • causes less of a concern •Incarcerated • joined by pedicles to levels above and below • causes less of a concern
  • 97. On the basis of orientation 1. Dorsal hemivertebra: classically results in kyphosis 2. Lateral hemivertebra: classically results in scoliosis 3. Ventral hemivertebra (extremely rare): results in lordosis
  • 98. This case shows a semi-segmental left thoracic hemivertebra.
  • 99. Block vertebra Block vertebra is a type of vertebral anomaly where there is a failure of separation of two or more adjacent vertebral bodies. 1. Combined vertebrae may be of normal height, short, or tall 2. Disc space is frequently rudimentary or absent 3. The "wasp-waist sign" is seen in congenital block vertebra
  • 100. CT scan revealed block vertebra on C5 and C6 vertebral level (arrowheads)
  • 101. Butterfly vertebra Butterfly vertebra is a type of vertebral anomaly that results from the failure of fusion of the lateral halves of the vertebral body because of persistent notochordal tissue between them. There is widening of the affected vertebral body. The bodies above and below the butterfly vertebra adapt to the altered intervertebral discs on either side by showing concavities along the adjacent endplates. Some bone bridging may occur across the defect which usually happens in the thoracic or lumbar segments of the spine.
  • 102.
  • 103. Arcuate foramen The arcuate foramen (foramen arcuale atlantis, ponticulus posticus or posterior ponticle, or Kimerle anomaly) is a frequently encountered normal variant of the atlas. It develops by calcification of the posterior atlanto-occipital membrane. The atlantic portion (V3) of the vertebral arteries pass through this foramen. Incidence is ~8% (range 1-15%) and it is more common in females. It has a variable morphology, can be complete or incomplete and may be unilateral or bilateral.
  • 104. The arcuate foramen is contained within the circle annotation.
  • 105. Other Conditions involving Cervical Spine
  • 106. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is typically an entity seen in patients of Asian descent, although it is seen in all ethnic groups. Location cervical: 75% thoracic: 15% lumbar: 10% Types of OPLL type 1 : continuous (ossification of several vertebral segments) type 2 : segmental (several segments are affected, ossification is disrupted) type 3 : mixed (mix of 1 and 2) type 4 : localised (circumscribed, only one or two segments)
  • 107. Sagittal bone window CT showing OPLL
  • 108. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), also referred to as Forestier disease, is a common condition characterised by bony proliferation at sites of tendinous and ligamentous insertion of the spine affecting elderly individuals. On imaging, it is typically characterised by the flowing ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament , The cervical and thoracic spines, in particular, are affected. DISH most commonly affects the elderly, especially 6th to 7th decades. Imaging:- Florid, flowing ossification is noted along the anterior or anterolateral aspects of at least four contiguous vertebrae, so-called flowing ossifications Disc spaces are usually well preserved Ankylosis is more commonly seen in the thoracic than in the cervical or lumbar spine.
  • 109. There is calcification of anterior longitudinal ligament resulting in an irregular melting candle wax like calcified mass anterior to the C3 to T4 vertebrae, with normal appearing intervertebral disc spaces.
  • 110. Rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune multisystemic inflammatory disease which affects many organs but predominantly attacks the synovial tissues and joints. The cervical spine is frequently involved in RA ( in approximately 50% of patients), whereas a thoracic and lumbar involvement are rare. Findings include: 1. Erosion of the dens 2. Atlantoaxial subluxation 3. Atlantoaxial impaction (cranial settling): cephalad migration of C2 4. Erosion and fusion of uncovertebral (apophyseal joints ) and facet joints 5. Osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures 6. Erosion of spinous processes
  • 111. Sagittal bone window CT image shows Severe degenerative change at the atlanto-dens articulation with erosions.
  • 112. Limitations of Multidetector CT Although multidetector CT is often sufficient for making the binary determination of whether surgery is necessary or not, important determinants of management, including disk herniations, ligamentum flavum infolding, cord swelling, contusion or hemorrhage, and epidural hematoma, are not well evaluated with CT but are clearly depicted at MR imaging.