This document discusses CrossMark, a service from CrossRef that helps readers determine the current status and version of scholarly journal articles. CrossMark places a logo on published articles that links to information about corrections, updates, and which version is being maintained by the publisher. The service aims to address library and researcher concerns about version control and tracking post-publication changes for articles across different search tools and formats. CrossMark also has the potential to provide additional publication record information like funding sources and peer review details. An early pilot of the CrossMark service involved 9 publishers and over 36,000 article records.
General criteria for high quality open access journalsIna Smith
Access the recording at http://webinar.assaf.org.za/playback/presentation/0.9.0/playback.html?meetingId=64bc87cc9da0731f5d8fc426bf700e593aeddd92-1479448454255
Monitoring & evaluating the usage of your Open Access JournalIna Smith
This document discusses various tools for monitoring and evaluating the usage of open access journals, including general tools like Google Analytics, platform-specific tools from SciELO SA, and journal-specific tools used by the South African Journal of Science. It provides information on tracking metrics like downloads, citations, social media engagement, and collaboration with authors and institutions to increase a journal's reach and measure its impact.
This document discusses how to identify and avoid "predatory journals" that charge publication fees but provide minimal peer review services. It provides guidance from Tufts University, the British Medical Journal, and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine on evaluating journals. Key recommendations include checking if a journal is listed on the Directory of Open Access Journals or indexed in databases, whether the publisher belongs to organizations like OASPA that promote standards, and ensuring the editorial board consists of recognizable experts in the field. Visitors to a journal's website should look for signs of professionalism and transparency regarding practices and fees.
ResearchGate, SciHub, and Beyond: Sharing Scholarly Work LegallyErin Owens
The document discusses various platforms for sharing scholarly work, including disciplinary repositories, institutional repositories, and scholarly collaborative networks. It outlines recent lawsuits against SciHub and restrictions placed on ResearchGate by publishers. Key challenges addressed are determining author rights based on publishing contracts and balancing open access with publisher business models. The presentation provides guidance on legally sharing work through repositories, negotiating publishing agreements, and avoiding problematic sites like SciHub. It emphasizes working with libraries for assistance navigating author rights and sharing options.
Lars Bjørnshauge's presentation to the National Scholarly Editor's Forum of South Africa, Cape Town, 30th July 2014. Questionable publishing practices are not a phenomenon limited to open access publishers. In this presentation, Lars explores the phenomenon of questionable publishing practices, sometimes referred to as predatory publishers. The slides explore some thoughts on guidelines for transparency and what DOAJ is doing in this area. It includes tips on how to spot a questionable publisher in 5 minutes!
There are currently approximately 28,000 journals publishing 1.5 million papers annually. Although the majority of new journals are legitimate, the credentials of some are questionable. Such journals and publishers are referred to as 'predatory'. They commonly send spam emails to potential authors, solicit submissions and request payment of article processing charges, but lack academic rigour or credibility. This presentation will look at examples of publishers, publications and provide practical tips to identify and avoid predatory publishers.
What is meant by ‘predatory publisher’? Who is preyed on and by whom? What are the consequences of this publishing phenomenon? The Director of the US ISSN Center will draw on the experience of the ISSN Network and National Library of Medicine (NLM) to explore these issues. Criteria for inclusion in NLM’s indexes and the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), as well as criteria for denying or revoking an ISSN, will be outlined. Statistics on the ubiquity and longevity of these publications, their impact on ISSN and NLM, and the role of librarians will be discussed.
The document provides an overview of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). It discusses DOAJ's mission to make open access journals more attractive publishing channels. It describes who benefits from DOAJ, including researchers, funders, libraries, and publishers. It outlines DOAJ's application review process, efforts to identify questionable journals, and strategies for collaboration and sustainability.
General criteria for high quality open access journalsIna Smith
Access the recording at http://webinar.assaf.org.za/playback/presentation/0.9.0/playback.html?meetingId=64bc87cc9da0731f5d8fc426bf700e593aeddd92-1479448454255
Monitoring & evaluating the usage of your Open Access JournalIna Smith
This document discusses various tools for monitoring and evaluating the usage of open access journals, including general tools like Google Analytics, platform-specific tools from SciELO SA, and journal-specific tools used by the South African Journal of Science. It provides information on tracking metrics like downloads, citations, social media engagement, and collaboration with authors and institutions to increase a journal's reach and measure its impact.
This document discusses how to identify and avoid "predatory journals" that charge publication fees but provide minimal peer review services. It provides guidance from Tufts University, the British Medical Journal, and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine on evaluating journals. Key recommendations include checking if a journal is listed on the Directory of Open Access Journals or indexed in databases, whether the publisher belongs to organizations like OASPA that promote standards, and ensuring the editorial board consists of recognizable experts in the field. Visitors to a journal's website should look for signs of professionalism and transparency regarding practices and fees.
ResearchGate, SciHub, and Beyond: Sharing Scholarly Work LegallyErin Owens
The document discusses various platforms for sharing scholarly work, including disciplinary repositories, institutional repositories, and scholarly collaborative networks. It outlines recent lawsuits against SciHub and restrictions placed on ResearchGate by publishers. Key challenges addressed are determining author rights based on publishing contracts and balancing open access with publisher business models. The presentation provides guidance on legally sharing work through repositories, negotiating publishing agreements, and avoiding problematic sites like SciHub. It emphasizes working with libraries for assistance navigating author rights and sharing options.
Lars Bjørnshauge's presentation to the National Scholarly Editor's Forum of South Africa, Cape Town, 30th July 2014. Questionable publishing practices are not a phenomenon limited to open access publishers. In this presentation, Lars explores the phenomenon of questionable publishing practices, sometimes referred to as predatory publishers. The slides explore some thoughts on guidelines for transparency and what DOAJ is doing in this area. It includes tips on how to spot a questionable publisher in 5 minutes!
There are currently approximately 28,000 journals publishing 1.5 million papers annually. Although the majority of new journals are legitimate, the credentials of some are questionable. Such journals and publishers are referred to as 'predatory'. They commonly send spam emails to potential authors, solicit submissions and request payment of article processing charges, but lack academic rigour or credibility. This presentation will look at examples of publishers, publications and provide practical tips to identify and avoid predatory publishers.
What is meant by ‘predatory publisher’? Who is preyed on and by whom? What are the consequences of this publishing phenomenon? The Director of the US ISSN Center will draw on the experience of the ISSN Network and National Library of Medicine (NLM) to explore these issues. Criteria for inclusion in NLM’s indexes and the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), as well as criteria for denying or revoking an ISSN, will be outlined. Statistics on the ubiquity and longevity of these publications, their impact on ISSN and NLM, and the role of librarians will be discussed.
The document provides an overview of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). It discusses DOAJ's mission to make open access journals more attractive publishing channels. It describes who benefits from DOAJ, including researchers, funders, libraries, and publishers. It outlines DOAJ's application review process, efforts to identify questionable journals, and strategies for collaboration and sustainability.
Predatory publishers aim to exploit the open-access model by publishing counterfeit journals and charging publication fees without providing proper editorial and publishing services. They often target inexperienced researchers. Jeffrey Beall, who coined the term "predatory open access publishing," warns that these publishers use deception to appear legitimate and entrap researchers into submitting work and paying fees. The number of predatory publishers has grown rapidly since 2011. Researchers should carefully vet journals and publishers to avoid predatory practices by checking for full contact details, legitimate editorial boards, transparent fee policies, and signs the operation may intend to deceive authors.
This document summarizes a library instruction session on research databases and search strategies. It discusses constructing effective search strategies using Boolean operators, truncation, adjacency, and subject headings. It also reviews background databases and subject specific databases for researching Latinx populations in the United States, including Academic Search Complete, SocINDEX, and America: History & Life. Tips are provided for searching, evaluating results, and obtaining full-text articles through interlibrary loan if needed.
1) The Prospect working group collaborating on a common API to enable text and data mining across publishers through content negotiation and licensing verification.
2) CrossRef metadata services like search, funding data through FundRef, and a proposed click-through licensing service for text mining.
3) Tools and services for small publishers around DOIs, archiving, and identifying member needs and interests.
Predatory publishing: pitfalls for the unwary. 25 Oct 2013Simon Huggard
Presentation given at the Library Research Forum, La Trobe University, 25 October 2013. Discusses issues with predatory publishers and what to check. Discusses open access publishing in an institutional digital repository
Predatory publishing: what it is and how to avoid itUQSCADS
There are currently approximately 28,000 journals publishing 1.5 million papers annually. Although the majority of new journals are legitimate, the credentials of some are questionable. Such journals and publishers are referred to as 'predatory'. They commonly send spam emails to potential authors, solicit submissions and request payment of article processing charges, but lack academic rigor or credibility.
This presentation provides researchers with
an insight into predatory behaviors and and how they can avoid them.
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Scholarly PublishingErin Owens
Learn more about how all of us can help to further equity, diversity, and inclusion in scholarship with the choices that we make as authors, reviewers, and readers.
This document discusses predatory publishing and provides context and examples. It begins by defining predatory publishing as journals that exploit the open-access model by publishing counterfeit journals and lacking transparency. It then discusses the history, including librarian Jeffrey Beall first noticing spam solicitations in 2009 and coining the term "predatory publisher" in 2010. Examples of predatory journals, bogus metrics, and questionable peer review processes are shown. Finally, it discusses initiatives like Think Check Submit that provide checklists to help researchers identify trusted journals and avoid predatory publishers.
This document summarizes a presentation about questionable publishers from the perspective of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). The presentation discusses that while there are issues with quality in both subscription and open access journals, the problem is often portrayed as solely an open access issue. In reality, the percentage of low-quality journals is comparable between models. Blacklists aim to avoid questionable journals with low publishing or scientific quality, but DOAJ takes a thorough, evidence-based approach to investigating suspicious cases before exclusion.
An introduction to the library, research methods and citations for nursing students at Saint Francis College.
Watch a video presentation on YouTube: http://youtu.be/imHsW7qaTqo
The role of DOAJ in quality assurance of OA publishingClara Armengou
This presentation discusses assessing the quality of open access publishing and research. It covers several topics:
1. It examines different ways of measuring quality, including indexing services, DOAJ criteria for publishing practices and open access, and citation metrics.
2. It addresses common misunderstandings about open access, and provides examples of copyright and licensing statements from Chinese journals.
3. It notes limitations of using citations, journal impact factors, or where research is published to assess scientific quality, stating that quality can only be assessed at the article level.
Finding Insights in Article-Level Metrics for Research EvaluationRichard Cave
The use of Article-Level Metrics (ALMs) as an indicator of an article’s quality and impact has dramatically increased in the last year. Publishers continue to add ALMs to research articles and new organizations have been created to aggregate ALMs across multiple fields including usage, citations, and social media. Using ALMs, researchers, librarians, funders, and the general public are able to gain insight into research articles that are the most widely read and used. PLOS launched ALM Reports (http://almreports.plos.org/) which allow users to view ALMs for any set of PLOS articles and visualize the data results. This allows users to quickly explore and compare ALMs for a large number of articles by searching for papers published by researchers at their institutions, for papers funded by specific funding agencies, or by searching on generic terms within an article. The application can be used to access up-to-date information on research papers, to view data on the downstream impact of the research, and to measure evidence of wider engagement with the research. These insights provide a powerful way to evaluate impact of research across many articles in a single view.
A presentation, made by Lars to the Asian Council of Science Editors, on the problems facing academic publishing and what DOAJ is doing to push a change towards greater openness
This document discusses assessing the quality of scholarly publishing and research. It begins by outlining some of the advantages of open access publishing, including increased citations and readership. It then examines methods for assessing research quality, including peer review and citation analysis. However, it notes several flaws with relying solely on citations and journal impact factors to determine quality. Specifically, it shows data that the majority of papers published in high impact journals receive fewer citations than the journal's impact factor. The document thus argues for the need for alternative metrics and a multidimensional approach to research assessment.
Online Journal Management using Open Journal Systems (OJS)Ina Smith
This document provides an overview of using Open Journal Systems (OJS) for online journal management. OJS is an open source journal management and publishing system that allows journals to accept submissions, peer review, edit and publish articles online. It has benefits such as being locally controlled, providing online submission and management tools, and building capacity for journals with fewer resources. The document discusses implementation of OJS, training, and continued support available through organizations like ASSAf and PKP. It also covers topics like registering with indexes, rights management, analytics and measuring impact.
The document discusses assessing the quality of open access journals. It begins by addressing misconceptions that open access journals are lower quality than subscription journals. In reality, the percentage of high quality journals is about the same for open access and subscription journals. The quality of a journal can be assessed based on the quality of publishing and quality of the science. Quality of publishing looks at factors like peer review processes, editorial boards, and transparency. Quality of the science focuses more on the individual article level rather than journal-level metrics like impact factors. Overall impact factors are an imperfect measure and do not necessarily reflect the quality of individual articles or journals overall.
This document discusses predatory publishing, which involves dishonest publishers exploiting the open-access model by publishing counterfeit journals to dupe researchers into paying publication fees without providing expected services like peer review or visibility. It provides tips to help researchers identify predatory publishers, such as checking tools like Beall's list or asking colleagues about journal quality and impact. Various types of deceptive publishing practices are described, and criteria for evaluating publishers' legitimacy are outlined.
Introduction to the Directory of Open Access journalsIna Smith
The document provides an introduction and overview of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). It discusses what the DOAJ is, defines open access, and outlines the mission and goals of promoting open access scholarly journals. It also describes the application and evaluation process for journals to be included in the DOAJ, and lists the required information journals must provide, such as editorial details, aims and scope, peer review process, and digital archiving policies.
Predatory publishers aim to exploit the open-access model by publishing counterfeit journals and charging publication fees without providing proper editorial and publishing services. They often target inexperienced researchers. Jeffrey Beall, who coined the term "predatory open access publishing," warns that these publishers use deception to appear legitimate and entrap researchers into submitting work and paying fees. The number of predatory publishers has grown rapidly since 2011. Researchers should carefully vet journals and publishers to avoid predatory practices by checking for full contact details, legitimate editorial boards, transparent fee policies, and signs the operation may intend to deceive authors.
This document summarizes a library instruction session on research databases and search strategies. It discusses constructing effective search strategies using Boolean operators, truncation, adjacency, and subject headings. It also reviews background databases and subject specific databases for researching Latinx populations in the United States, including Academic Search Complete, SocINDEX, and America: History & Life. Tips are provided for searching, evaluating results, and obtaining full-text articles through interlibrary loan if needed.
1) The Prospect working group collaborating on a common API to enable text and data mining across publishers through content negotiation and licensing verification.
2) CrossRef metadata services like search, funding data through FundRef, and a proposed click-through licensing service for text mining.
3) Tools and services for small publishers around DOIs, archiving, and identifying member needs and interests.
Predatory publishing: pitfalls for the unwary. 25 Oct 2013Simon Huggard
Presentation given at the Library Research Forum, La Trobe University, 25 October 2013. Discusses issues with predatory publishers and what to check. Discusses open access publishing in an institutional digital repository
Predatory publishing: what it is and how to avoid itUQSCADS
There are currently approximately 28,000 journals publishing 1.5 million papers annually. Although the majority of new journals are legitimate, the credentials of some are questionable. Such journals and publishers are referred to as 'predatory'. They commonly send spam emails to potential authors, solicit submissions and request payment of article processing charges, but lack academic rigor or credibility.
This presentation provides researchers with
an insight into predatory behaviors and and how they can avoid them.
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Scholarly PublishingErin Owens
Learn more about how all of us can help to further equity, diversity, and inclusion in scholarship with the choices that we make as authors, reviewers, and readers.
This document discusses predatory publishing and provides context and examples. It begins by defining predatory publishing as journals that exploit the open-access model by publishing counterfeit journals and lacking transparency. It then discusses the history, including librarian Jeffrey Beall first noticing spam solicitations in 2009 and coining the term "predatory publisher" in 2010. Examples of predatory journals, bogus metrics, and questionable peer review processes are shown. Finally, it discusses initiatives like Think Check Submit that provide checklists to help researchers identify trusted journals and avoid predatory publishers.
This document summarizes a presentation about questionable publishers from the perspective of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). The presentation discusses that while there are issues with quality in both subscription and open access journals, the problem is often portrayed as solely an open access issue. In reality, the percentage of low-quality journals is comparable between models. Blacklists aim to avoid questionable journals with low publishing or scientific quality, but DOAJ takes a thorough, evidence-based approach to investigating suspicious cases before exclusion.
An introduction to the library, research methods and citations for nursing students at Saint Francis College.
Watch a video presentation on YouTube: http://youtu.be/imHsW7qaTqo
The role of DOAJ in quality assurance of OA publishingClara Armengou
This presentation discusses assessing the quality of open access publishing and research. It covers several topics:
1. It examines different ways of measuring quality, including indexing services, DOAJ criteria for publishing practices and open access, and citation metrics.
2. It addresses common misunderstandings about open access, and provides examples of copyright and licensing statements from Chinese journals.
3. It notes limitations of using citations, journal impact factors, or where research is published to assess scientific quality, stating that quality can only be assessed at the article level.
Finding Insights in Article-Level Metrics for Research EvaluationRichard Cave
The use of Article-Level Metrics (ALMs) as an indicator of an article’s quality and impact has dramatically increased in the last year. Publishers continue to add ALMs to research articles and new organizations have been created to aggregate ALMs across multiple fields including usage, citations, and social media. Using ALMs, researchers, librarians, funders, and the general public are able to gain insight into research articles that are the most widely read and used. PLOS launched ALM Reports (http://almreports.plos.org/) which allow users to view ALMs for any set of PLOS articles and visualize the data results. This allows users to quickly explore and compare ALMs for a large number of articles by searching for papers published by researchers at their institutions, for papers funded by specific funding agencies, or by searching on generic terms within an article. The application can be used to access up-to-date information on research papers, to view data on the downstream impact of the research, and to measure evidence of wider engagement with the research. These insights provide a powerful way to evaluate impact of research across many articles in a single view.
A presentation, made by Lars to the Asian Council of Science Editors, on the problems facing academic publishing and what DOAJ is doing to push a change towards greater openness
This document discusses assessing the quality of scholarly publishing and research. It begins by outlining some of the advantages of open access publishing, including increased citations and readership. It then examines methods for assessing research quality, including peer review and citation analysis. However, it notes several flaws with relying solely on citations and journal impact factors to determine quality. Specifically, it shows data that the majority of papers published in high impact journals receive fewer citations than the journal's impact factor. The document thus argues for the need for alternative metrics and a multidimensional approach to research assessment.
Online Journal Management using Open Journal Systems (OJS)Ina Smith
This document provides an overview of using Open Journal Systems (OJS) for online journal management. OJS is an open source journal management and publishing system that allows journals to accept submissions, peer review, edit and publish articles online. It has benefits such as being locally controlled, providing online submission and management tools, and building capacity for journals with fewer resources. The document discusses implementation of OJS, training, and continued support available through organizations like ASSAf and PKP. It also covers topics like registering with indexes, rights management, analytics and measuring impact.
The document discusses assessing the quality of open access journals. It begins by addressing misconceptions that open access journals are lower quality than subscription journals. In reality, the percentage of high quality journals is about the same for open access and subscription journals. The quality of a journal can be assessed based on the quality of publishing and quality of the science. Quality of publishing looks at factors like peer review processes, editorial boards, and transparency. Quality of the science focuses more on the individual article level rather than journal-level metrics like impact factors. Overall impact factors are an imperfect measure and do not necessarily reflect the quality of individual articles or journals overall.
This document discusses predatory publishing, which involves dishonest publishers exploiting the open-access model by publishing counterfeit journals to dupe researchers into paying publication fees without providing expected services like peer review or visibility. It provides tips to help researchers identify predatory publishers, such as checking tools like Beall's list or asking colleagues about journal quality and impact. Various types of deceptive publishing practices are described, and criteria for evaluating publishers' legitimacy are outlined.
Introduction to the Directory of Open Access journalsIna Smith
The document provides an introduction and overview of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). It discusses what the DOAJ is, defines open access, and outlines the mission and goals of promoting open access scholarly journals. It also describes the application and evaluation process for journals to be included in the DOAJ, and lists the required information journals must provide, such as editorial details, aims and scope, peer review process, and digital archiving policies.
A short PPT going over some of the basic tips on using an iPad, like how to bookmark something, how to copy and paste, how to change some settings, etc.
This document provides tips for creating strong and memorable passwords, such as substituting numbers and symbols for letters in common words, combining unrelated words, using the first letter of phrases, and using quotes, references or clues to derive a password. Suggestions include passwords like M!nnes0t@, DonkeyTrainPDF, tbasihw based on a Monty Python quote, and Wita$voau$ based on a line from Monty Python and the Holy Grail. The document advises writing down a clue if the full password is hard to remember.
This is a presentation I'll be doing for the Twin Cities Media Alliance. I'll be presenting at public libraries around the Twin Cities metro on apps you can use for your business or organization.
Academic libraries play an important role in supporting research in three key areas:
1. They facilitate literature searches through discovery services, subject databases, and remote access to subscribed resources. They also guide researchers on open access publishing and predatory journals.
2. They provide information literacy instruction and reference services to help researchers effectively find and evaluate information.
3. They assist researchers in managing their research profiles and outputs to increase visibility and track citations. This includes guidance on ORCID, Google Scholar, and Scopus profiles as well as publishing and citation metrics.
The document provides guidance on smart research through online tools. It discusses literature search tools and platforms, reference management tools, where to publish research, managing research profiles, and measuring citation impact. It also discusses research data management tools, including the research data lifecycle, FAIR principles, stages of data management, funding agency requirements, data management plans, best practices, and managing sensitive data. The key topics covered are literature searching, reference management, publishing research, profiling research, measuring impact, and managing research data.
Role of libraries in research and scholarly communicationNikesh Narayanan
Libraries play an important role in supporting research through facilitating literature searches, providing information literacy and reference services, and guiding researchers in publishing and managing their research profiles. Libraries can help researchers efficiently search across disjointed information sources through federated search software or web-scale discovery tools which provide a single search interface. Libraries also help connect researchers to open access resources and guide them on where and how to publish their research findings.
This document discusses various ways to maximize the impact of scholarly research publications. It covers journal impact metrics like the impact factor, h-index, and altmetrics. It also discusses open access publishing options like institutional repositories, gold open access journals, and article processing charges. Strategies suggested for maximizing impact include co-publishing internationally, targeting high impact journals, setting up profiles on Google Scholar and ORCID, and utilizing social media and repositories to promote publications.
This document discusses citation metrics and summarization tools like Scopus and Web of Science. It provides an overview of Scopus and Web of Science, describing their coverage, features, and subscriptions. It then outlines a multi-step process to assess the scholarly impact of an academic department using Scopus, including defining search criteria, exporting results, and requesting author profile merges. Finally, it briefly introduces altmetrics and additional tools to supplement traditional citation metrics.
This document provides an overview of a webinar on getting published and increasing the chances of success. The webinar will include a presentation on choosing publishing venues, preparing manuscripts, and submitting papers for peer review. It will also feature an open Q&A session. Presenters will discuss challenges facing researchers from developing countries and how to identify predatory journals. The webinar aims to provide guidance to researchers throughout the research cycle.
This document provides an overview of the academic publishing process. It discusses conducting publishable research, writing papers, choosing journals, adhering to guidelines, preparing submissions, managing peer review, handling revisions, acceptance and rejection. Key steps include refining research questions, conducting thorough literature reviews, using appropriate methodologies, writing for the intended journal, addressing reviewer feedback, and considering alternative journals for rejected papers. The roles and responsibilities of authors and publishers are also outlined.
CrossRef DOIs for African Journal Partnership JournalsCrossref
This document discusses CrossRef and the services it provides to scholarly publishers and journals. CrossRef is a not-for-profit organization that provides Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) and linking services to over 5,000 member publications. It summarizes CrossRef's reference linking, metadata, and plagiarism checking services. It also provides information for African journals on how to get CrossRef DOIs and participate in CrossRef programs and services.
This webinar will give an overview of Crossref and it’s network of member publishers, along with information on Crossref best practices and the services it's members can make use of. Many of these services have specific relevance to OA content, and the webinar will touch on these, as well as looking into specific aspects of the Crossref metadata that can help dissemination and discoverability of OA content.
Crossref will be joined by two guest speakers - Frontiers will talk about their OA workflows and how Crossref services integrate with these, and James MacGregor from PKP will show participants the Crossref Export/Registration Plugin which journals can enable to deposit DOIs with Crossref and to help them participate in other Crossref services.
This document provides information about journal clubs and academic journals. It discusses the history of journal clubs, how to select and present articles in a journal club. It also covers different types of academic journals, how they are indexed and ranked. Key metrics for evaluating journals are discussed, including impact factor, eigenfactor score, and SJR. Predatory journals are defined and tips are provided to identify them. Different types of research articles are outlined. The use of impact factor to evaluate individual studies is critiqued. Ways to improve citation of one's own work are suggested.
IJESC journal meets the requirements on how to publish your research paper in international journals. This journal will make you easier to publish your article more quickly.
This document discusses several studies and expert opinions on the reliability of Wikipedia as a source of information. A 2005 study found that Wikipedia articles contained slightly more factual errors than Britannica articles, though both contained errors. Librarians found Wikipedia to have good coverage of current events but warned that sole reliance on it limits research. Academics noted Wikipedia can provide a good starting point but has inherent reliability issues due to potential bias and inaccuracies in cited sources. Conclusions drawn were that Wikipedia provides a good first approximation for topics but should not be the only source used in research.
Early Career Tactics to Increase Scholarly ImpactElaine Lasda
Workshp for Ph.D. candidates, postdocs and faculy on how bilbiometrics, altmetrics, open access, ORCID, and other resources enable greater visibility of research output.
Project Transfer is a voluntary code of practice endorsed by 36 publishers to provide best practices for transferring journals between publishers. It aims to minimize disruptions to access during transfers. An alerting service notifies subscribers like librarians about upcoming transfers. The service was recently upgraded to be more robust and searchable. Surveys found publishers and librarians still encounter issues during some transfers. Future work may expand the code of practice and increase its formality. Participation and awareness of Transfer remains important.
This document discusses five major criteria for evaluating the quality and reliability of websites: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It provides examples and explanations of each criterion. Accuracy refers to whether the information is factually correct since anyone can publish online without editing. Authority examines whether the author is qualified and credentials are provided. Objectivity considers potential biases in the content. Currency looks at how recently the site was updated. Coverage assesses what topics are included and at what depth. The document aims to help readers develop skills for critically analyzing websites.
Jay patel Open Access TIPPA Midwest presentation june 2013Jay Patel
From closed to Open Access
This document summarizes how open access publishing is changing the way research is disseminated. It provides a brief history of scholarly publishing, outlines the benefits and limitations of traditional closed access models, and defines open access. Open access provides free online access to peer-reviewed research and is growing due to funder and institutional mandates. While it increases access and sharing, open access faces challenges around quality control and funding publication fees. The future may see greater open access support and alternative models like preprint servers and fluid embedded papers.
The document discusses using Wikipedia to improve science outreach and communication. It provides examples of how researchers can contribute to Wikipedia by writing overview articles on their fields of research, providing detailed explanations of concepts, and ensuring articles have updated references. The document outlines things for researchers to consider when contributing, such as audience and language. It also provides tips for writing for Wikipedia, including following syntax conventions and writing in a factual tone.
Similar to CrossMark Demo at the MLA May 2012 (20)
Crossref LIVE: The Benefits of Open Infrastructure (APAC time zones) - 29th O...Crossref
In November 2020, Crossref formally adopted the “Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure” (POSI). POSI is a list of sixteen commitments that will now guide the board, staff, and Crossref’s development as an organisation into the future.
This webinar took place on the 29th October at 03:00 PM AEST (UTC+10) and covered:
- What are the Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI) and why are they needed?
- Why POSI is important for Crossref and how it will help realise the Research Nexus
- Open metadata and infrastructure services from Crossref
Presented in English by Cameron Neylon, Professor of Research Communications, Centre for Culture and Technology, at Curtin University, Amanda Bartell, Head of Member Experience at Crossref, and Vanessa Fairhurst, Community Engagement Manager at Crossref.
Crossref LIVE Chinese网络研讨会——Crossref简介 – 14 Oct 2021 Crossref
Crossref使研究成果易于查找、引用、链接、评估以及重复利用。我们是一个非营利性会员组织,其存在是为了使学术交流变得更好。
施普林格·自然旗下Atlantis Press图书部门编辑总监、Crossref大使党冉女士将与万方数据的郭晓峰女士携手介绍Crossref的概况,主要包括:
Crossref的简要历史
我们的会员
数字对象唯一标识符(DOI)和元数据的重要性
加入Crossref的好处
如何加入并开始工作
本次网络研讨会与新会员、出版商、研究人员、图书馆员、编辑以及任何想了解如何与Crossref合作的人有关。
本次网络研讨会将以中文进行,包括提问时间共持续60分钟。
----
Presented on the 14th October 2021, Ran Dang, Editorial Director of Atlantis Press Books, Springer Nature and Crossref Ambassador, together with Guo Xiaofeng of WanFang Data, provide an overview of Crossref including:
A brief history of Crossref
Our membership
Persistent identifiers (DOI) and the importance of metadata
The benefits of joining Crossref
How to join and get started
This webinar is relevant for new members, publishers, researchers, librarians, editors, and anyone who would like to know more about how to work with Crossref.
The webinar is presented in Chinese and lasts 60 minutes including time for questions.
En este webinario veremos una descripción general de nuestro servicio Crossmark, que incluye:
Qué es Crossmark
Cómo usar el servicio
La importancia de mantener el contenido actualizado
Cómo encontrar más ayuda y soporte
Working with ROR as a Crossref member: what you need to knowCrossref
Webinar focusing on the importance of ROR and how to implement that as a Crossref member.
Covers:
What is ROR?
Why is Crossref supporting ROR?
Publisher use cases for ROR (from Hindawi)
How to become a ROR adopter
Discussion/Q&A
A recording of the presentation is available on the Crossref YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9Mtqb64OEk
Преимущества и варианты использования метаданных в Crossref / The Value and ...Crossref
Онлайн-трансляция организована при поддержке НЭИКОН в рамках Специального мероприятия “Научная информация и научные ресурсы в условиях локдауна 2020-2021”.
Во время трансляции будут обсуждаться следующие вопросы:
регистрация контента в Crossref;
важность метаданных для Crossref: качество и количество;
как улучшить метаданные?
где получить помощь и поддержку.
------
The webinar was held on September 17, 2021 at 10.00 (Moscow time UTC+3).
This online event was organized in collaboration with NEICON and takes place within the framework of the wider conference “Scientific information and scientific resources in the conditions of the lockdown 2020-2021”.
During the webinar we cover:
- Content Registration at Crossref
- The importance of Crossref metadata: Quality and Quantity
- How to improve your metadata
- Where to find further help and support
The webinar lasts approximately 60 minutes including time for questions. Presented in Russian.
Seminario web ‘Similarity Check’, en españolCrossref
Similarity Check es una herramienta de Turnitin que ayuda a los editores a detectar plagio mediante la comparación de documentos con una gran base de datos de más de 70 mil millones de páginas web y 135 millones de artículos. Los editores pueden cargar documentos en iThenticate para obtener un informe de similitud que analiza las coincidencias y les ayuda a determinar si existe plagio o no. Cualquier editor puede participar pagando una tarifa administrativa y tarifas de verificación de documentos.
Crossref LIVE Indonesia: One Search Platform (Drs. Muhammad Syarif Bando pres...Crossref
Indonesia One Search merupakan portal satu pintu untuk mencari koleksi publik yang dimiliki perpustakaan dan lembaga penyedia lainnya di Indonesia. Saat ini telah terkumpul lebih dari 10 juta judul koleksi seperti buku, tesis, jurnal, video, gambar, dan dokumen teks lengkap dari berbagai perpustakaan yang tergabung. Indonesia One Search terus dikembangkan untuk menambah fitur seperti ekstraksi teks penuh, analisis konten, de
Crossref LIVE Indonesia: The Future of Indonesian Journal Policy (with Dr. Lu...Crossref
Dr. Lukman provides an overview of journal publishing in Indonesia. Presented in Bahasa Indonesian.
This webinar was presented as part of the Crossref LIVE Indonesia webinar series from the 13th - 15th July 2021.
Crossref LIVE Indonesia: The Value and Use of Crossref Metadata, CRLIVE-ID 15...Crossref
This webinar was presented in English by Crossref staff Vanessa Fairhurst and Ginny Hendricks on the 15th July 2021 as part of a series of Crossref LIVE Indonesia webinars.
This webinar covers:
- A quick re-cap of content registration
- What metadata you can send to Crossref
- How your metadata is used in Crossref tools and services and in the wider academic community
- How you can use our Participation Reports tool to assess and improve your metadata records at Crossref
The content is relevant for Crossref members, particularly new members, and anyone who would like to know more about how to work with Crossref and how we fit into the wider scholarly community.
Crossref LIVE Indonesia: Content Registration at Crossref, CRLIVE-ID 14 July ...Crossref
This webinar was presented in English by Crossref staff Vanessa Fairhurst and Amanda Bartell on the 14th July 2021 as part of a series of Crossref LIVE Indonesia webinars.
This webinar covers:
- What is a DOI
- What do we mean by metadata
- Different content types you can register at Crossref
- Different ways for you to register your content at Crossref (including a demo of the web deposit form and OJS Crossref plug-in)
- How to make corrections or additions to your metadata
- What happens if content moves to a different publisher
The content is relevant for Crossref members, particularly new members, and anyone who would like to know more about how to work with Crossref and how we fit into the wider scholarly community.
Crossref LIVE Indonesia: An Introduction to Crossref, CRLIVE-ID 13 July 2021Crossref
This webinar was presented by Crossref staff Vanessa Fairhurst and Rachael Lammey on the 13th July 2021 as part of a series of Crossref LIVE Indonesia webinars.
This webinar covers:
- A brief history of Crossref
- Who are our members
- How to join Crossref
- Persistent identifiers (DOI) and related metadata
- What are the benefits of joining Crossref?
- Why publishers (and other organizations) around the world join Crossref
The content is relevant for Crossref members, particularly new members, and anyone who would like to know more about how to work with Crossref and how we fit into the wider scholarly community.
Crossref İçerik Kaydı Webinarı, Türkçe | Content Registration at Crossref , ...Crossref
Content Registration at Crossref. Webinar held on Tuesday, June 8th at 14:00 Turkey (UTC+3).
Presented by Crossref Turkish Ambassador Haydar Oruç, the webinar included an overview of how to register content at Crossref and the importance and use of scholarly metadata.
Agenda:
- Content registration tools
- Importance of accurate, comprehensive and up-to-date metadata
- How to update and fix metadata records
- Ways to get further help and support
Webinar held on 8 June 2021
------
"Çapraz Referans İçerik Kaydı". Webinar 8 Haziran Salı günü Türkiye saati ile 14:00'te (UTC+3) gerçekleştirildi.
Crossref Türkiye Büyükelçisi Haydar Oruç'un yapacağı sunumda; Crossref'e içeriğin nasıl kaydedileceği, bilimsel metadatanın önemi ve kullanımı hakkında genel bir bakış sunulacak ve konular aşağıdaki gibi olacaktır:
- İçerik kaydetme araçları
- Doğru, kapsamlı ve güncel üst verinin önemi
- Meta veri kayıtları nasıl güncellenir ve düzeltilir
- Daha fazla yardım ve destek almanın yolları
Web semineri, Crossref ile nasıl çalışılacağını öğrenmek ve Crossref içeriğini daha geniş akademik toplulukla, özellikle Crossref üyeleriyle (özellikle yeni üyeler) alakalı hale getirmek isteyen herkese açıktır.
Los Metadatos Para la Comunidad de InvestigacionCrossref
Los miembros del equipo de la comunidad Crossref presentarán un taller para discutir:
• Introducción a Crossref
• DOI y registro de contenido
• Los metadatos para la comunidad de investigación
تسجيل المحتوي مع كروس رف – ندوة عبر الانترنت باللغة العربية | Content Registr...Crossref
This webinar was held on Wednesday 17 March 2021 at 14.00 UAE (UTC+4).
Mohamad Mostafa, Publishing Editor at Knowledge E and Crossref Ambassador, provided an overview of how to register content with Crossref including:
- Tools for registering content
- The importance of accurate, comprehensive and up-to-date metadata
- How to make updates and corrections to metadata records
- The importance of conflict and resolution reports
- Ways to get further help and support
This webinar content is relevant for Crossref members, publishing service providers, researchers, librarians, editors, and anyone who would like to know more about how to work with Crossref.
سيقوم محمد مصطفي، محرر النشر لدي نوليدچ إي وسفير كروس رف بتقديم نظرة شاملة حول كيفية تسجيل المحتوى لدى كروس رف تتضمن النقاط التالية:
- أدوات تسجيل المحتوى
- أهمية ان تكون البيانات الوصفية دقيقة، شاملة وحديثة
- كيفية إجراء تحديت وتصحيح للبيانات الوصفية المسجلة سابقًا
- أهمية تقارير المشاركة والتضارب
- طرق طلب المزيد من المساعدة والدعم
المحتوي مناسب لأعضاء كروس رف، ومقدمو خدمات النشر، والباحثين، وأمناء المكتبات والمحررين وكل من لديه الرغبة في معرفة المزيد حول كيفية العمل مع كروس رف.
Presented by Vanessa Fairhurst, Paul Davis and Rachael Lammey on March 3rd 2021.
The webinar covers how to create and correctly display a DOI, the importance of metadata and the various tools for content registration including the web deposit form, Metadata Manager and OJS plug-ins.
This document provides an overview of CrossMark, a CrossRef initiative to help readers determine if a scholarly work has been updated. CrossMark uses a logo to identify publisher-maintained versions of content. Clicking the logo tells the reader if there have been any updates and directs them to the publisher's version. It can also display additional publication record information like funding sources, conflicts of interest, or peer review details. The CrossMark pilot launched in summer 2011 and is being implemented more widely, with marketing support and training webinars for publishers.
Participation reports webinar December 2020Crossref
During this webinar we’ll take you on a tour of our Participation Reports, which give Crossref members and the wider scholarly community a clear, visual snapshot of the metadata that each one of our members is registering with Crossref.
Registering richer metadata makes your content more useful and more discoverable to researchers and the wider scholarly community. This webinar was held on 8th December 2020.
Participation reports webinar November 2020Crossref
During this webinar we’ll take you on a tour of our Participation Reports, which give Crossref members and the wider scholarly community a clear, visual snapshot of the metadata that each one of our members is registering with Crossref.
Registering richer metadata makes your content more useful and more discoverable to researchers and the wider scholarly community. This webinar was held on 18 November 2020,
Introduction to Crossmark/Crossmark: O que é e como usarCrossref
"Crossmark: O que é e como usar" – O webinário será apresentado em português (do Brasil) - 14 de Outubro de 2020.
O Crossmark oferece às revistas uma forma padronizada de comunicar importantes atualizações no conteúdo e garantir que as informações do artigo divulgado são atuais e seguras.
A apresentação mostrará o que é necessário para implementar o Crossmark, requisitos técnicos e, claro, oportunidade para sanar dúvidas.
O conteúdo é interessante para quem é membro da Crossref, empresas de serviços editoriais, pesquisadores, bibliotecários, agências de fomento e membros de comitês editoriais de periódicos científicos.
A apresentação ficará por conta dos embaixadores da Crossref no Brasil, Bruna Erlandsson e Edilson Damasio.
****
"Crossmark: What it is and how to use it" - The webinar will be presented in Brazilian Portuguese - October 14, 2020.
Crossmark provides publishers with a standardized way of communicating important updates to content and ensuring that the information in the published article is current and secure.
The presentation will show what is needed to implement the Crossmark, technical requirements and the opportunity to answer questions.
The content is interesting for those who are members of Crossref, publishing services companies, researchers, librarians, funding agencies and members of editorial committees of scientific journals.
The presentation will provided by Crossref ambassadors in Brazil, Bruna Erlandsson and Edilson Damasio.
Webinar held 6 October 2020.
The webinar is relevant for new and existing Crossref members, publishers, editors, researchers, service
providers, hosting platforms, funders, librarians; really anyone interested in finding out a bit more about what
Crossref is and does.
This webinar covers:
• How to register content with Crossref
• How to make updates to your metadata in order to make changes, corrections, or to add more detail
• Participation reports
• Additional services and where to find help.
Sessions presented in English by Crossref staff.
Fueling AI with Great Data with Airbyte WebinarZilliz
This talk will focus on how to collect data from a variety of sources, leveraging this data for RAG and other GenAI use cases, and finally charting your course to productionalization.
zkStudyClub - LatticeFold: A Lattice-based Folding Scheme and its Application...Alex Pruden
Folding is a recent technique for building efficient recursive SNARKs. Several elegant folding protocols have been proposed, such as Nova, Supernova, Hypernova, Protostar, and others. However, all of them rely on an additively homomorphic commitment scheme based on discrete log, and are therefore not post-quantum secure. In this work we present LatticeFold, the first lattice-based folding protocol based on the Module SIS problem. This folding protocol naturally leads to an efficient recursive lattice-based SNARK and an efficient PCD scheme. LatticeFold supports folding low-degree relations, such as R1CS, as well as high-degree relations, such as CCS. The key challenge is to construct a secure folding protocol that works with the Ajtai commitment scheme. The difficulty, is ensuring that extracted witnesses are low norm through many rounds of folding. We present a novel technique using the sumcheck protocol to ensure that extracted witnesses are always low norm no matter how many rounds of folding are used. Our evaluation of the final proof system suggests that it is as performant as Hypernova, while providing post-quantum security.
Paper Link: https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/257
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/temporal-event-neural-networks-a-more-efficient-alternative-to-the-transformer-a-presentation-from-brainchip/
Chris Jones, Director of Product Management at BrainChip , presents the “Temporal Event Neural Networks: A More Efficient Alternative to the Transformer” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
The expansion of AI services necessitates enhanced computational capabilities on edge devices. Temporal Event Neural Networks (TENNs), developed by BrainChip, represent a novel and highly efficient state-space network. TENNs demonstrate exceptional proficiency in handling multi-dimensional streaming data, facilitating advancements in object detection, action recognition, speech enhancement and language model/sequence generation. Through the utilization of polynomial-based continuous convolutions, TENNs streamline models, expedite training processes and significantly diminish memory requirements, achieving notable reductions of up to 50x in parameters and 5,000x in energy consumption compared to prevailing methodologies like transformers.
Integration with BrainChip’s Akida neuromorphic hardware IP further enhances TENNs’ capabilities, enabling the realization of highly capable, portable and passively cooled edge devices. This presentation delves into the technical innovations underlying TENNs, presents real-world benchmarks, and elucidates how this cutting-edge approach is positioned to revolutionize edge AI across diverse applications.
Freshworks Rethinks NoSQL for Rapid Scaling & Cost-EfficiencyScyllaDB
Freshworks creates AI-boosted business software that helps employees work more efficiently and effectively. Managing data across multiple RDBMS and NoSQL databases was already a challenge at their current scale. To prepare for 10X growth, they knew it was time to rethink their database strategy. Learn how they architected a solution that would simplify scaling while keeping costs under control.
"$10 thousand per minute of downtime: architecture, queues, streaming and fin...Fwdays
Direct losses from downtime in 1 minute = $5-$10 thousand dollars. Reputation is priceless.
As part of the talk, we will consider the architectural strategies necessary for the development of highly loaded fintech solutions. We will focus on using queues and streaming to efficiently work and manage large amounts of data in real-time and to minimize latency.
We will focus special attention on the architectural patterns used in the design of the fintech system, microservices and event-driven architecture, which ensure scalability, fault tolerance, and consistency of the entire system.
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity serverAntonios Katsarakis
This slide deck presents DLHT, a concurrent in-memory hashtable. Despite efforts to optimize hashtables, that go as far as sacrificing core functionality, state-of-the-art designs still incur multiple memory accesses per request and block request processing in three cases. First, most hashtables block while waiting for data to be retrieved from memory. Second, open-addressing designs, which represent the current state-of-the-art, either cannot free index slots on deletes or must block all requests to do so. Third, index resizes block every request until all objects are copied to the new index. Defying folklore wisdom, DLHT forgoes open-addressing and adopts a fully-featured and memory-aware closed-addressing design based on bounded cache-line-chaining. This design offers lock-free index operations and deletes that free slots instantly, (2) completes most requests with a single memory access, (3) utilizes software prefetching to hide memory latencies, and (4) employs a novel non-blocking and parallel resizing. In a commodity server and a memory-resident workload, DLHT surpasses 1.6B requests per second and provides 3.5x (12x) the throughput of the state-of-the-art closed-addressing (open-addressing) resizable hashtable on Gets (Deletes).
"Frontline Battles with DDoS: Best practices and Lessons Learned", Igor IvaniukFwdays
At this talk we will discuss DDoS protection tools and best practices, discuss network architectures and what AWS has to offer. Also, we will look into one of the largest DDoS attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure that happened in February 2022. We'll see, what techniques helped to keep the web resources available for Ukrainians and how AWS improved DDoS protection for all customers based on Ukraine experience
The Microsoft 365 Migration Tutorial For Beginner.pptxoperationspcvita
This presentation will help you understand the power of Microsoft 365. However, we have mentioned every productivity app included in Office 365. Additionally, we have suggested the migration situation related to Office 365 and how we can help you.
You can also read: https://www.systoolsgroup.com/updates/office-365-tenant-to-tenant-migration-step-by-step-complete-guide/
Monitoring and Managing Anomaly Detection on OpenShift.pdfTosin Akinosho
Monitoring and Managing Anomaly Detection on OpenShift
Overview
Dive into the world of anomaly detection on edge devices with our comprehensive hands-on tutorial. This SlideShare presentation will guide you through the entire process, from data collection and model training to edge deployment and real-time monitoring. Perfect for those looking to implement robust anomaly detection systems on resource-constrained IoT/edge devices.
Key Topics Covered
1. Introduction to Anomaly Detection
- Understand the fundamentals of anomaly detection and its importance in identifying unusual behavior or failures in systems.
2. Understanding Edge (IoT)
- Learn about edge computing and IoT, and how they enable real-time data processing and decision-making at the source.
3. What is ArgoCD?
- Discover ArgoCD, a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes, and its role in deploying applications on edge devices.
4. Deployment Using ArgoCD for Edge Devices
- Step-by-step guide on deploying anomaly detection models on edge devices using ArgoCD.
5. Introduction to Apache Kafka and S3
- Explore Apache Kafka for real-time data streaming and Amazon S3 for scalable storage solutions.
6. Viewing Kafka Messages in the Data Lake
- Learn how to view and analyze Kafka messages stored in a data lake for better insights.
7. What is Prometheus?
- Get to know Prometheus, an open-source monitoring and alerting toolkit, and its application in monitoring edge devices.
8. Monitoring Application Metrics with Prometheus
- Detailed instructions on setting up Prometheus to monitor the performance and health of your anomaly detection system.
9. What is Camel K?
- Introduction to Camel K, a lightweight integration framework built on Apache Camel, designed for Kubernetes.
10. Configuring Camel K Integrations for Data Pipelines
- Learn how to configure Camel K for seamless data pipeline integrations in your anomaly detection workflow.
11. What is a Jupyter Notebook?
- Overview of Jupyter Notebooks, an open-source web application for creating and sharing documents with live code, equations, visualizations, and narrative text.
12. Jupyter Notebooks with Code Examples
- Hands-on examples and code snippets in Jupyter Notebooks to help you implement and test anomaly detection models.
Conversational agents, or chatbots, are increasingly used to access all sorts of services using natural language. While open-domain chatbots - like ChatGPT - can converse on any topic, task-oriented chatbots - the focus of this paper - are designed for specific tasks, like booking a flight, obtaining customer support, or setting an appointment. Like any other software, task-oriented chatbots need to be properly tested, usually by defining and executing test scenarios (i.e., sequences of user-chatbot interactions). However, there is currently a lack of methods to quantify the completeness and strength of such test scenarios, which can lead to low-quality tests, and hence to buggy chatbots.
To fill this gap, we propose adapting mutation testing (MuT) for task-oriented chatbots. To this end, we introduce a set of mutation operators that emulate faults in chatbot designs, an architecture that enables MuT on chatbots built using heterogeneous technologies, and a practical realisation as an Eclipse plugin. Moreover, we evaluate the applicability, effectiveness and efficiency of our approach on open-source chatbots, with promising results.
What is an RPA CoE? Session 1 – CoE VisionDianaGray10
In the first session, we will review the organization's vision and how this has an impact on the COE Structure.
Topics covered:
• The role of a steering committee
• How do the organization’s priorities determine CoE Structure?
Speaker:
Chris Bolin, Senior Intelligent Automation Architect Anika Systems
Must Know Postgres Extension for DBA and Developer during MigrationMydbops
Mydbops Opensource Database Meetup 16
Topic: Must-Know PostgreSQL Extensions for Developers and DBAs During Migration
Speaker: Deepak Mahto, Founder of DataCloudGaze Consulting
Date & Time: 8th June | 10 AM - 1 PM IST
Venue: Bangalore International Centre, Bangalore
Abstract: Discover how PostgreSQL extensions can be your secret weapon! This talk explores how key extensions enhance database capabilities and streamline the migration process for users moving from other relational databases like Oracle.
Key Takeaways:
* Learn about crucial extensions like oracle_fdw, pgtt, and pg_audit that ease migration complexities.
* Gain valuable strategies for implementing these extensions in PostgreSQL to achieve license freedom.
* Discover how these key extensions can empower both developers and DBAs during the migration process.
* Don't miss this chance to gain practical knowledge from an industry expert and stay updated on the latest open-source database trends.
Mydbops Managed Services specializes in taking the pain out of database management while optimizing performance. Since 2015, we have been providing top-notch support and assistance for the top three open-source databases: MySQL, MongoDB, and PostgreSQL.
Our team offers a wide range of services, including assistance, support, consulting, 24/7 operations, and expertise in all relevant technologies. We help organizations improve their database's performance, scalability, efficiency, and availability.
Contact us: info@mydbops.com
Visit: https://www.mydbops.com/
Follow us on LinkedIn: https://in.linkedin.com/company/mydbops
For more details and updates, please follow up the below links.
Meetup Page : https://www.meetup.com/mydbops-databa...
Twitter: https://twitter.com/mydbopsofficial
Blogs: https://www.mydbops.com/blog/
Facebook(Meta): https://www.facebook.com/mydbops/
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoptionTatiana Kojar
Manage and optimize your license adoption and consumption with SAM4U, an SAP free customer software asset management tool.
SAM4U, an SAP complimentary software asset management tool for customers, delivers a detailed and well-structured overview of license inventory and usage with a user-friendly interface. We offer a hosted, cost-effective, and performance-optimized SAM4U setup in the Skybuffer Cloud environment. You retain ownership of the system and data, while we manage the ABAP 7.58 infrastructure, ensuring fixed Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and exceptional services through the SAP Fiori interface.
Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)Jakub Marek
An English 🇬🇧 translation of a presentation to the speech I gave about the main changes brought by CCS TSI 2023 at the biggest Czech conference on Communications and signalling systems on Railways, which was held in Clarion Hotel Olomouc from 7th to 9th November 2023 (konferenceszt.cz). Attended by around 500 participants and 200 on-line followers.
The original Czech 🇨🇿 version of the presentation can be found here: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/hlavni-novinky-souvisejici-s-ccs-tsi-2023-2023-1695/269688092 .
The videorecording (in Czech) from the presentation is available here: https://youtu.be/WzjJWm4IyPk?si=SImb06tuXGb30BEH .
This talk will cover ScyllaDB Architecture from the cluster-level view and zoom in on data distribution and internal node architecture. In the process, we will learn the secret sauce used to get ScyllaDB's high availability and superior performance. We will also touch on the upcoming changes to ScyllaDB architecture, moving to strongly consistent metadata and tablets.
Essentials of Automations: Exploring Attributes & Automation ParametersSafe Software
Building automations in FME Flow can save time, money, and help businesses scale by eliminating data silos and providing data to stakeholders in real-time. One essential component to orchestrating complex automations is the use of attributes & automation parameters (both formerly known as “keys”). In fact, it’s unlikely you’ll ever build an Automation without using these components, but what exactly are they?
Attributes & automation parameters enable the automation author to pass data values from one automation component to the next. During this webinar, our FME Flow Specialists will cover leveraging the three types of these output attributes & parameters in FME Flow: Event, Custom, and Automation. As a bonus, they’ll also be making use of the Split-Merge Block functionality.
You’ll leave this webinar with a better understanding of how to maximize the potential of automations by making use of attributes & automation parameters, with the ultimate goal of setting your enterprise integration workflows up on autopilot.
Leveraging the Graph for Clinical Trials and Standards
CrossMark Demo at the MLA May 2012
1.
2. IN SEATTLE
21 May 2012
Medical Libraries Association
Carol Anne Meyer
@meyercarol
Carol Anne Meyer
Business Development &
Marketing
@meyercarol
3. “The Web is by nature an interactive environment,
yet online journals are mostly static, befitting their
traditional role as a never-changing scholarly record.”
4.
5.
6.
7. How Does a
Researcher Know
• Author name
• Affiliation
• How many times something has
been cited
• On a reputable web site (publisher
or journal brand)
• Ratings, Comments
9. Library Concerns
• Users not always clear which version of a
document they are reading.
10. Library Concerns
• Users not always clear which version of a
document they are reading.
• Google and Google Scholar search results
return multiple versions.
11. Library Concerns
• Users not always clear which version of a
document they are reading.
• Google and Google Scholar search results
return multiple versions.
• Librarians do not have time to track post-
publication changes at the article level.
12. Library Concerns
• Users not always clear which version of a
document they are reading.
• Google and Google Scholar search results
return multiple versions.
• Librarians do not have time to track post-
publication changes at the article level.
• Readers might cite “incorrect” versions
instead of the maintained Version of Record
13. Library Concerns
• Users not always clear which version of a
document they are reading.
• Google and Google Scholar search results
return multiple versions.
• Librarians do not have time to track post-
publication changes at the article level.
• Readers might cite “incorrect” versions
instead of the maintained Version of Record
• Researchers complain that Google does not
return up-to-date versions of their own
articles.
14. Library Concerns
• Users not always clear which version of a
document they are reading.
• Google and Google Scholar search results
return multiple versions.
• Librarians do not have time to track post-
publication changes at the article level.
• Readers might cite “incorrect” versions
instead of the maintained Version of Record
• Researchers complain that Google does not
return up-to-date versions of their own
articles.
• Usage statistics don’t reflect true resource
15. Specific Correction Problems
Mentioned
• Interlibrary loan
• Downloaded PDFs
• Printed articles.
Lack of awareness of corrections or updates particularly
problematic in medicine and related fields.
45. How does
help?
• Reader easily sees current status &
whether changes have been made.
46. How does
help?
• Reader easily sees current status &
whether changes have been made.
• Clicking the logo tells you
47. How does
help?
• Reader easily sees current status &
whether changes have been made.
• Clicking the logo tells you
• Whether there have been any
corrections
48. How does
help?
• Reader easily sees current status &
whether changes have been made.
• Clicking the logo tells you
• Whether there have been any
corrections
• If this instance is being maintained by
the publisher
49. How does
help?
• Reader easily sees current status &
whether changes have been made.
• Clicking the logo tells you
• Whether there have been any
corrections
• If this instance is being maintained by
the publisher
• Where the publisher-maintained version
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57. What kind of Publication Record
information could be available?
58. What kind of Publication Record
information could be available?
• Funding disclosures--FundRef
59. What kind of Publication Record
information could be available?
• Funding disclosures--FundRef
• Conflict of interest statements
60. What kind of Publication Record
information could be available?
• Funding disclosures--FundRef
• Conflict of interest statements
• Publication history (submission, revision and accepted dates)
61. What kind of Publication Record
information could be available?
• Funding disclosures--FundRef
• Conflict of interest statements
• Publication history (submission, revision and accepted dates)
• Location of data deposits or registries
62. What kind of Publication Record
information could be available?
• Funding disclosures--FundRef
• Conflict of interest statements
• Publication history (submission, revision and accepted dates)
• Location of data deposits or registries
• Peer review process used
63. What kind of Publication Record
information could be available?
• Funding disclosures--FundRef
• Conflict of interest statements
• Publication history (submission, revision and accepted dates)
• Location of data deposits or registries
• Peer review process used
• CrossCheck plagiarism screening process
64. What kind of Publication Record
information could be available?
• Funding disclosures--FundRef
• Conflict of interest statements
• Publication history (submission, revision and accepted dates)
• Location of data deposits or registries
• Peer review process used
• CrossCheck plagiarism screening process
• License types
65. What kind of Publication Record
information could be available?
• Funding disclosures--FundRef
• Conflict of interest statements
• Publication history (submission, revision and accepted dates)
• Location of data deposits or registries
• Peer review process used
• CrossCheck plagiarism screening process
• License types
• and more...
72. Now!
Pilot running since summer
2011
Opening to all CrossRef
Members April 2012.
73. 9 Publishers
• Elsevier
• International Union of
Crystallography •American Institute of Physics
• Oxford University Press (AIP)
(OUP) •World Bank
• The Royal Society •The Rockefeller University
• Vilnius Gediminas Technical Press
University
• Wiley-Blackwell
•Scholar Science Journals
The idea that journals should be published and preserved in amber doesn’t work in a web world.\n
The way we are communicating corrections to readers is archaic. This is a real photo of a correction notice for a book from a bulletin board!\n
Retractions are on the rise. \n
It’s time for the idea of a “final version” of an article to rest in peace.\n
\n
on point 3: They do teach patrons the importance of such notifications and where to look for them. \n
on point 3: They do teach patrons the importance of such notifications and where to look for them. \n
on point 3: They do teach patrons the importance of such notifications and where to look for them. \n
on point 3: They do teach patrons the importance of such notifications and where to look for them. \n
on point 3: They do teach patrons the importance of such notifications and where to look for them. \n
on point 3: They do teach patrons the importance of such notifications and where to look for them. \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
While most publishers are responsible about notifying readers of changes, they all handle them in a different way. It may not be easy for researchers to find corrections and other changes. \nFor example, in this article from The Royal Society, the correction is noted to the right of the article. \nSalvatore Federico and T. Christian Gasser, “Nonlinear elasticity of biological tissues with statistical fibre orientation,” J. R. Soc. Interface, June 6, 2010 7 (47) 955-966; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0502\n\n\n\n
In this article, the correction is noted under the “referred to by” heading below the bibliographic metadata for the article. \nChek Kim Loi, Moyra Sweetnam Evans, “Cultural differences in the organization of research article introductions from the field of educational psychology: English and Chinese,” J. Pragmatics, 42 (10) (2010) 2814–2825, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.010 \n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
Which leads to a second problem, which is that there is often more than one version of an article available. Here we have an article from the Journal of Surgical Research which was retracted because it was found to contain plagiarised material. On the publisher’s site it’s flagged pretty clearly as retracted up here in the article title...\n
If you search for this article in Google Scholar, however, the publisher’s site isn’t the first to appear - in fact it’s the fourth listing\n
The first result is an information sharing site for doctors where someone has posted the abstract, and here there’s no mention of the retraction....\n
The second is PubMed, and the retraction has made it on to the Pub Med copy, although it’s not as obvious as it is on the publisher’s site - it’s not part of the article title but a separate link below.\n
But what if you’d come across the abstract somewhere else? Maybe through CiteULike, where again there’s no mention of the retraction. \n
<wait for slide to load!> Or there could well be a copy in the author&#x2019;s institutional repository... \nWith all of these options there&#x2019;s a reasonable chance that the reader isn&#x2019;t necessarily going to see the correction or retraction that the publisher has issued. \n
<wait for slide to load!> Or there could well be a copy in the author&#x2019;s institutional repository... \nWith all of these options there&#x2019;s a reasonable chance that the reader isn&#x2019;t necessarily going to see the correction or retraction that the publisher has issued. \n
<wait for slide to load!> Or there could well be a copy in the author&#x2019;s institutional repository... \nWith all of these options there&#x2019;s a reasonable chance that the reader isn&#x2019;t necessarily going to see the correction or retraction that the publisher has issued. \n
<wait for slide to load!> Or there could well be a copy in the author&#x2019;s institutional repository... \nWith all of these options there&#x2019;s a reasonable chance that the reader isn&#x2019;t necessarily going to see the correction or retraction that the publisher has issued. \n
<wait for slide to load!> Or there could well be a copy in the author&#x2019;s institutional repository... \nWith all of these options there&#x2019;s a reasonable chance that the reader isn&#x2019;t necessarily going to see the correction or retraction that the publisher has issued. \n
As we have seen the web can host multiple versions an article or other scholarly content. For example, scholarly documents can be found on a journal or aggregator site or on author home page, institutional repository, or subject repository. Some of these documents are the published versions, sometimes called the &#x201C;version of record&#x201D; and some of them may be preprints or other versions. \nThese multiple versions can exist no matter what the access rules are for the documents. They can be open access or by subscription. In either case, CrossMark can help identify updates or other changes. \n\n
\n
For example, this paper displayed in Mendeley. \nUse Rachael&#x2019;s examples of a medical paper that has been retracted for this audience. \n<Show examples of multiple copies of the same article from different sources. Then show an example of the article at the publishers&#x2019; site. You can use these examples, or substitute your own.>\nMendeley\n\n
Is also available in the Directory of Open Access Journals. ...\n
..and on the publisher&#x2019;s web site. Even when the publisher allows this kind of distribution, it makes it even more difficult to track down important changes.\n\nCrossMark is a service being introduced by CrossRef (that&#x2019;s the organization that provides Digital Object Identifiers&#x2014;DOIs&#x2014;and allows publishers to link their references together). CrossMark will allow you to quickly identify a published version of a scholarly document and to see if that document has had any updates. \n\n\n \n
It is being funded by publishers, which means there is no cost to researchers or libraries. \n\nEven after an article or other scholarly content has been published, occasionally further changes may be made. These changes could include\n\n
It is being funded by publishers, which means there is no cost to researchers or libraries. \n\nEven after an article or other scholarly content has been published, occasionally further changes may be made. These changes could include\n\n
&#x221E;editions (for example for books)\n&#x221E;versions (for example, reference entries, data sets) \n\n
&#x221E;editions (for example for books)\n&#x221E;versions (for example, reference entries, data sets) \n\n
&#x221E;editions (for example for books)\n&#x221E;versions (for example, reference entries, data sets) \n\n
&#x221E;editions (for example for books)\n&#x221E;versions (for example, reference entries, data sets) \n\n
&#x221E;editions (for example for books)\n&#x221E;versions (for example, reference entries, data sets) \n\n
&#x221E;editions (for example for books)\n&#x221E;versions (for example, reference entries, data sets) \n\n
&#x221E;editions (for example for books)\n&#x221E;versions (for example, reference entries, data sets) \n\n
&#x221E;editions (for example for books)\n&#x221E;versions (for example, reference entries, data sets) \n\n
&#x221E;editions (for example for books)\n&#x221E;versions (for example, reference entries, data sets) \n\n
&#x221E;editions (for example for books)\n&#x221E;versions (for example, reference entries, data sets) \n\n
&#x221E;editions (for example for books)\n&#x221E;versions (for example, reference entries, data sets) \n\n
Scholarly publishers have a duty to keep the scholarly record sound and free from fraudulent or incorrect research by updating the status of the documents that they publish when those documents undergo changes that could change the interpretation or crediting of the work. In practice, publishers can only update the copies of the work that they control and are responsible for. \nCrossMark is a service that is designed to\n \n * Allow the reader to easily determine the current status of a\n scholarly document and whether any changes have been made.\n \n* Display important, non-bibliographic publication record information highlighted by the publisher that helps readers evaluate the content. We&#x2019;ll see some examples in a moment.\n\nWhen you see the CrossMark logo, you know that you are looking at a published document, and that the publisher has made a commitment to keep the content up to date. When you click on a CrossMark logo, you can see if it is current or if there have been updates. \n\n\n
Scholarly publishers have a duty to keep the scholarly record sound and free from fraudulent or incorrect research by updating the status of the documents that they publish when those documents undergo changes that could change the interpretation or crediting of the work. In practice, publishers can only update the copies of the work that they control and are responsible for. \nCrossMark is a service that is designed to\n \n * Allow the reader to easily determine the current status of a\n scholarly document and whether any changes have been made.\n \n* Display important, non-bibliographic publication record information highlighted by the publisher that helps readers evaluate the content. We&#x2019;ll see some examples in a moment.\n\nWhen you see the CrossMark logo, you know that you are looking at a published document, and that the publisher has made a commitment to keep the content up to date. When you click on a CrossMark logo, you can see if it is current or if there have been updates. \n\n\n
Scholarly publishers have a duty to keep the scholarly record sound and free from fraudulent or incorrect research by updating the status of the documents that they publish when those documents undergo changes that could change the interpretation or crediting of the work. In practice, publishers can only update the copies of the work that they control and are responsible for. \nCrossMark is a service that is designed to\n \n * Allow the reader to easily determine the current status of a\n scholarly document and whether any changes have been made.\n \n* Display important, non-bibliographic publication record information highlighted by the publisher that helps readers evaluate the content. We&#x2019;ll see some examples in a moment.\n\nWhen you see the CrossMark logo, you know that you are looking at a published document, and that the publisher has made a commitment to keep the content up to date. When you click on a CrossMark logo, you can see if it is current or if there have been updates. \n\n\n
Scholarly publishers have a duty to keep the scholarly record sound and free from fraudulent or incorrect research by updating the status of the documents that they publish when those documents undergo changes that could change the interpretation or crediting of the work. In practice, publishers can only update the copies of the work that they control and are responsible for. \nCrossMark is a service that is designed to\n \n * Allow the reader to easily determine the current status of a\n scholarly document and whether any changes have been made.\n \n* Display important, non-bibliographic publication record information highlighted by the publisher that helps readers evaluate the content. We&#x2019;ll see some examples in a moment.\n\nWhen you see the CrossMark logo, you know that you are looking at a published document, and that the publisher has made a commitment to keep the content up to date. When you click on a CrossMark logo, you can see if it is current or if there have been updates. \n\n\n
Scholarly publishers have a duty to keep the scholarly record sound and free from fraudulent or incorrect research by updating the status of the documents that they publish when those documents undergo changes that could change the interpretation or crediting of the work. In practice, publishers can only update the copies of the work that they control and are responsible for. \nCrossMark is a service that is designed to\n \n * Allow the reader to easily determine the current status of a\n scholarly document and whether any changes have been made.\n \n* Display important, non-bibliographic publication record information highlighted by the publisher that helps readers evaluate the content. We&#x2019;ll see some examples in a moment.\n\nWhen you see the CrossMark logo, you know that you are looking at a published document, and that the publisher has made a commitment to keep the content up to date. When you click on a CrossMark logo, you can see if it is current or if there have been updates. \n\n\n
Scholarly publishers have a duty to keep the scholarly record sound and free from fraudulent or incorrect research by updating the status of the documents that they publish when those documents undergo changes that could change the interpretation or crediting of the work. In practice, publishers can only update the copies of the work that they control and are responsible for. \nCrossMark is a service that is designed to\n \n * Allow the reader to easily determine the current status of a\n scholarly document and whether any changes have been made.\n \n* Display important, non-bibliographic publication record information highlighted by the publisher that helps readers evaluate the content. We&#x2019;ll see some examples in a moment.\n\nWhen you see the CrossMark logo, you know that you are looking at a published document, and that the publisher has made a commitment to keep the content up to date. When you click on a CrossMark logo, you can see if it is current or if there have been updates. \n\n\n
Let&#x2019;s look at an example. As I&#x2019;m sure you know, researchers frequently download PDF versions of articles. Quite a long period may elapse before they look at them again. It is possible that a correction or other change could be issued after the researcher downloaded the document. \n\nHere is a fictitious example.\n\nAll I have to do is click on the CrossMark logo and I get a popup box telling me whether this article is up to date. \n\n
You can easily see that this document has an update&#x2014;-in fact, it has been retracted. I can click the CrossRef DOI to go to the retraction notice. \n\n[click the retraction DOI]\nhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5555/24242424x \n\n
http://psychoceramics.labs.crossref.org/10.5555-24242424x.html \n\nOf course, a retraction is a rare event, as it should be. In fact, most scholarly articles never have any kind of corrections.\n\n
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0108767310044892\n\nYou can see that CrossMark logos can appear on both PDFs and HTML documents and as long as the user is connected to the internet, they work the same. \n\n<Click on the slide to bring up a live internet connection, then hover over the CrossMark logo>\n\nOn an HTML page, when you hover over the CrossMark logo, you get a message that tells you to click to get status information and verify authenticity. \n\n<Click on the CrossMark logo>\n\n\n\n
In this case, you can see that the document is current, and no updates are available. This will be the result most of the time, but it&#x2019;s worth clicking on that logo every time you look at a document to make sure nothing has changed. \n\nDo you see the &#x201C;Record&#x201D; tab of this popup box? \n\n<Click on the record tab>\n\n
The Record tab gives additional publication record information about the content\nthat help readers evaluate the work. In this example, you can see\noptional data about the content type, the copyright statement, the peer review process, and publication history. \n\n<scroll down>\n\n
Some organizations are experimenting with using the Record tab for threaded publication information to highlight related research. \n
Some organizations are experimenting with using the Record tab for threaded publication information to highlight related research. \n
Some organizations are experimenting with using the Record tab for threaded publication information to highlight related research. \n
Some organizations are experimenting with using the Record tab for threaded publication information to highlight related research. \n
Some organizations are experimenting with using the Record tab for threaded publication information to highlight related research. \n
Some organizations are experimenting with using the Record tab for threaded publication information to highlight related research. \n
Some organizations are experimenting with using the Record tab for threaded publication information to highlight related research. \n
Some organizations are experimenting with using the Record tab for threaded publication information to highlight related research. \n
That&#x2019;s really all there is to using the CrossMark service.\n\n\n
That&#x2019;s really all there is to using the CrossMark service.\n\n\n
And the schedule for CrossMark - we&#x2019;ve got a number of publishers working with us on the pilot at the moment, and we extended that with a soft launch in April. \n
And the schedule for CrossMark - we&#x2019;ve got a number of publishers working with us on the pilot at the moment, and we extended that with a soft launch in April. \n
And the schedule for CrossMark - we&#x2019;ve got a number of publishers working with us on the pilot at the moment, and we extended that with a soft launch in April. \n
\n
...the first of the pilot participants to have CrossMark live was VGTU and you can see CrossMarks on their journal Business Theory and Practice. \n
The Royal Society has implemented CrossMark on their journal Proceedings B, going back to the start of 2011. \n
...and an example I showed earlier - the international union of crystallography who have so far deposited quite a large amount of CrossMark data. This example is showing the CrossMark on a full text article. \nLive PDFs on a sample issue now live on the pilot site too. \n
CrossMark is running on ten journals on Elsevier&#x2019;s Science Direct. \n
...and on two titles from Oxford Journals\n
CrossMark data will be freely available and machine readable and query-able, so could potentially be used in search results to flag content that has status verification and possible additional information, although this is something that we haven&#x2019;t discussed at any length with the search engines just yet. We have had some conversations with librarians about using CrossMark data to populate link resolvers by pulling back relevant information, and also with other third parties such as bibliographic management systems who might be able to pull status updates into users reference lists and personal libraries. While this screen is a mock-up a major search engine has committed to incorporating CrossMark. \n
We&#x2019;ve also got marketing materials for the service, with a dedicated CrossMark microsite for publishers, librarians and researchers which launched last week. We will be making a variety of banner ads available to members to help explain CrossMark to your readers and there are also sections for librarians and researchers to explain what CrossMark is and why it&#x2019;s such a valuable tool. \n
\n
\n
So remember, to cite with certainty, click the CrossMark logo once, click it twice, click it every time. \n