ONLINE ASSIGNMENT ON 
CRITICAL PEDAGOGY 
Submitted to, 
Dr. Padmapriya. P.V. 
N.S.S Training College 
Pandalam 
Submitted by, 
Nidhina. P.K. 
Natural Science 
Roll No: 107 
N.S.S Training College 
Pandalam
INDEX 
Sl.No. Content Page No 
1 
2 
3 
4 
Introduction 
Content 
Conclusion 
References 
1 
2-5 
6 
7
INTRODUCTION 
Critical Pedagogy is a philosophy of education and social movement that 
combines education with critical theory. First described by Paulo Freire, it has 
since been developed by Henry Giroux and others as a praxis – oriented 
“educational movement guided by passion and principle, to help students 
develop consciousness of freedom recognize authoritarian tendencies, and 
connect knowledge to power and the ability to take constructive action.” Among 
its leading figures are Michael Apple, bell hooks Joe L.Kincheloe, Peter Mc 
Laran, Henery Giroux and Patti Lather. Critical pedagogy includes relation ship 
between teaching and learning. Its proponents claim that it is a continues process 
of what they call “unlearning” , “learning” and “relearning” , “reflection” , 
evacuation and the impact that these actions have on the students in particular 
students whom they believe have been historically and continue to be 
disenfranchised by what they call ‘ traditional schooling’ 
Teacher education is the integral part of education system. Education is an 
important means to shape the density of the country. Any change in the nature, 
purpose and quality in education demands a concomitant change in teacher 
education. Delores report (1996) visualizes learning as “the treasure with in”. 
According to the report, learning hoists “the heart beat of society”. ‘Learning to 
know’, learning to do, learning to live together, and learning to be constituting 
the four pillars of education.
CONTENT 
Education is primarily intended the skill and capacity among the students in 
addition to acquisition and expansion of knowledge. At present the educational 
practices are firmly rooted on the objective ways of evolving knowledge. The 
traditional teaching prevents interaction and differential thinking among the 
students. Teacher is considered the custodian of the knowledge and the 
classroom interactions are centered mostly on him. The students particularly 
listen and learn from an authority of knowledge. The student – student 
interaction is curtailed and very little time is given for teacher student dialogue. 
This instructional practice fails to promote the interface between students and 
teachers. 
Conventional teaching learning promotes the learning capacity knowledge 
dimensions but curtails the student initiative, intellectual growth, critical 
thinking and problem showing ability. Critical pedagogy as an alternative mode 
of teaching and learning provides analytical skills, reflective thinking and assists 
students to achieve critical judgment and collective consciousness. It facilitates 
collective decision making through open discussion and by encouraging and 
recognizing multiple view points. Critical pedagogy emphasizes teaching 
through dialogues, dialectical and practical analysis of issue and phenomenon’s 
related to life. Its approach is democratic and aims at achieving equality and 
justice through educational process. Grounded in the work of Paulo Friere ‘ 
pedagogy of the oppressed, critical pedagogy is concerned in the development of 
knowledge, autonomy, reflectivity, transformation, representation of reality and 
action for creating better leaving environment. It creates endless possibilities for 
teachers aid the students to explore and construct the knowledge. It is a 
challenge to any type of alienation, oppression, subordination and submission in 
learning process. Teachers and students share each other knowledge; Learning 
becomes pleasant, reciprocal, dialogical and participatory in nature. It acts
against the oppressive schooling structures and liberates the needs for knowledge 
building and critical problem solving. 
Critical pedagogy has its root in the critical theory of the Frankurt school, whose 
influence is evident in the emancipatory works of Paulo Freire, the most 
renowned critical educator. Their efforts to humanizing the pedagogy challenged 
inequality and oppression in the contemporary education system. Contemporary 
critical educators, such as Henry.A, Giroux, Bell Hooks and peter Mc Laren are 
critiques of education as oppression and social polarization of schooling. 
Critical pedagogy is particularly concerned with teaching learning practices that 
are designated to raise learner’s critical consciousness regarding oppressive 
social condition. It focuses on personal liberation through the development of 
critical consciousness which is positioned as the necessary first step of the larger 
collective political struggle to challenge and transform oppressive social 
conditions such as social liberation can be achieved in classroom where pupils 
get an opportunity to react upon their own situations, criticize them and opt for 
changing. It attempts to empower learners to critique and challenge oppression 
in social conditions and worked towards a more just society 
In critical pedagogy the three variables of education viz the learner, teacher and 
content together attempt to disrupt the effect of oppressive regines of power both 
in the classroom and in the larger society. Critical pedagogy focuses on 
reconfiguring the traditional teacher student relationship, were teacher is the 
achieve agent, the one who knows and the and the students are the passive 
recipients of teachers knowledge. Instead of the classroom a site where knew 
knowledge grounded in the experience of students and teachers alike, is 
produced through meaningful dialogue.
Joe.L.Kincheloe lists the following basic concerns of critical pedagogy. 
 All education is inherently political and all pedagogy must be aware of 
this condition. 
 A social and educational vision of injustice and equality should ground all 
education. 
 Issue of race, class, gender, religion and physical ability are all important 
domains of oppression and critical anti – hegemonic action 
 The alleviation of oppression and human suffering is a key dimension of 
educational purpose. 
 Schools must not hurt students – good schools don’t blame stuents for 
their failures 
 All positions including the critical pedagogy itself must be problematised 
and questioned. 
 Education must both promote emancipator change and the cultivation of 
the intellect - these goals should never be in conflict, they should be 
synergistic. 
 The politics of knowledge and the issues of epistemology are central to 
understanding the way power operates in educational institutions to 
perpetuate privilege and subjugate the marginalized. 
 Education often reflects the interest and the needs of new modes of 
colonialism and empire. Such dynamics must be exposed, Understood and 
acted upon a part of critical transformative praxis. 
Corresponding to the social constructivist perspectives, the present science 
curriculum focuses on the setting up on a community of scientific inquiry 
where the teacher represents the very powerful discourse of scientific culture 
and scientific way of viewing and dealing the world. This shared 
environment of knowledge constructions will certainly acknowledge the basic 
concepts of critical pedagogy. If the students are confronted with a critical
approach to teaching they are most likely to participate in the learning 
process with a critical perspective of their own. If students can able to 
connect what they learn in science classroom what they face in the outside 
world, they will gradually develop the power of challenging some social 
dominations in their society another way to promote critical pedagogy in 
classroom is issue based approach which sets a classroom that promote open 
dialogue, where students relay their options about scientific aspects of social 
issues. Because in critical pedagogy the subject for educational programme 
flow from learning own life situations, from the problems that lie at the heart 
of their concern
CONCLUSION 
No one can deny that teachers have a per found impact on students achievement. 
Constructivism was proposed by eminent scholars like John Dewey, Maria 
Montessori, Mahatma Gandhi, Piaget, and Vygotsky; by failed is penetrate the 
traditional pedagological practices till 1990s. Researchers like Driver, Navak, 
Posner and Van Glasefeld experimented on classroom constructivism and found 
its effects to help on students initiate for the construction of knowledge. The 
constructivist paradigm calls reform sin classroom interaction pattern, 
pedagogical strategies and instructional practices. The role of teacher is changed 
from transmitter of knowledge to facilitator and guide in the exploration of 
knowledge. The student role shift from passive receiver to one of knowledge 
creator. In constructivist classroom, students took initiative in the learning 
process and become scholar in designing experiments, tests, hypothesis and 
drawing conclusion to become a part of self created knowledge. Performance 
based participatory learning enabled classroom.
REFERENCE 
 Salvin, E. Robert.(2003). Educational Psychology: theory and practice (7th 
Ed.) New York: Allyn and Bacon. 
 Vygot sky.L.(1978). Mind in society. The Development of higher 
Psychological process. MA: Hardvard University Press. 
 Wilson .B (1996). Constructivist learning environments. Englewood 
cliffs, New Jersy: Educational Technology Publications. 
 Sharma .S (2006) constructivist approaches to learning and teaching 
.NewDelhi : NCERT 
 Dr. Sivarajan.K , Prof.Faziluddin .A (2009) Science Education (7th Ed). 
Calicut University, Central Co-operative stores.

Critical pedagogy

  • 1.
    ONLINE ASSIGNMENT ON CRITICAL PEDAGOGY Submitted to, Dr. Padmapriya. P.V. N.S.S Training College Pandalam Submitted by, Nidhina. P.K. Natural Science Roll No: 107 N.S.S Training College Pandalam
  • 2.
    INDEX Sl.No. ContentPage No 1 2 3 4 Introduction Content Conclusion References 1 2-5 6 7
  • 3.
    INTRODUCTION Critical Pedagogyis a philosophy of education and social movement that combines education with critical theory. First described by Paulo Freire, it has since been developed by Henry Giroux and others as a praxis – oriented “educational movement guided by passion and principle, to help students develop consciousness of freedom recognize authoritarian tendencies, and connect knowledge to power and the ability to take constructive action.” Among its leading figures are Michael Apple, bell hooks Joe L.Kincheloe, Peter Mc Laran, Henery Giroux and Patti Lather. Critical pedagogy includes relation ship between teaching and learning. Its proponents claim that it is a continues process of what they call “unlearning” , “learning” and “relearning” , “reflection” , evacuation and the impact that these actions have on the students in particular students whom they believe have been historically and continue to be disenfranchised by what they call ‘ traditional schooling’ Teacher education is the integral part of education system. Education is an important means to shape the density of the country. Any change in the nature, purpose and quality in education demands a concomitant change in teacher education. Delores report (1996) visualizes learning as “the treasure with in”. According to the report, learning hoists “the heart beat of society”. ‘Learning to know’, learning to do, learning to live together, and learning to be constituting the four pillars of education.
  • 4.
    CONTENT Education isprimarily intended the skill and capacity among the students in addition to acquisition and expansion of knowledge. At present the educational practices are firmly rooted on the objective ways of evolving knowledge. The traditional teaching prevents interaction and differential thinking among the students. Teacher is considered the custodian of the knowledge and the classroom interactions are centered mostly on him. The students particularly listen and learn from an authority of knowledge. The student – student interaction is curtailed and very little time is given for teacher student dialogue. This instructional practice fails to promote the interface between students and teachers. Conventional teaching learning promotes the learning capacity knowledge dimensions but curtails the student initiative, intellectual growth, critical thinking and problem showing ability. Critical pedagogy as an alternative mode of teaching and learning provides analytical skills, reflective thinking and assists students to achieve critical judgment and collective consciousness. It facilitates collective decision making through open discussion and by encouraging and recognizing multiple view points. Critical pedagogy emphasizes teaching through dialogues, dialectical and practical analysis of issue and phenomenon’s related to life. Its approach is democratic and aims at achieving equality and justice through educational process. Grounded in the work of Paulo Friere ‘ pedagogy of the oppressed, critical pedagogy is concerned in the development of knowledge, autonomy, reflectivity, transformation, representation of reality and action for creating better leaving environment. It creates endless possibilities for teachers aid the students to explore and construct the knowledge. It is a challenge to any type of alienation, oppression, subordination and submission in learning process. Teachers and students share each other knowledge; Learning becomes pleasant, reciprocal, dialogical and participatory in nature. It acts
  • 5.
    against the oppressiveschooling structures and liberates the needs for knowledge building and critical problem solving. Critical pedagogy has its root in the critical theory of the Frankurt school, whose influence is evident in the emancipatory works of Paulo Freire, the most renowned critical educator. Their efforts to humanizing the pedagogy challenged inequality and oppression in the contemporary education system. Contemporary critical educators, such as Henry.A, Giroux, Bell Hooks and peter Mc Laren are critiques of education as oppression and social polarization of schooling. Critical pedagogy is particularly concerned with teaching learning practices that are designated to raise learner’s critical consciousness regarding oppressive social condition. It focuses on personal liberation through the development of critical consciousness which is positioned as the necessary first step of the larger collective political struggle to challenge and transform oppressive social conditions such as social liberation can be achieved in classroom where pupils get an opportunity to react upon their own situations, criticize them and opt for changing. It attempts to empower learners to critique and challenge oppression in social conditions and worked towards a more just society In critical pedagogy the three variables of education viz the learner, teacher and content together attempt to disrupt the effect of oppressive regines of power both in the classroom and in the larger society. Critical pedagogy focuses on reconfiguring the traditional teacher student relationship, were teacher is the achieve agent, the one who knows and the and the students are the passive recipients of teachers knowledge. Instead of the classroom a site where knew knowledge grounded in the experience of students and teachers alike, is produced through meaningful dialogue.
  • 6.
    Joe.L.Kincheloe lists thefollowing basic concerns of critical pedagogy.  All education is inherently political and all pedagogy must be aware of this condition.  A social and educational vision of injustice and equality should ground all education.  Issue of race, class, gender, religion and physical ability are all important domains of oppression and critical anti – hegemonic action  The alleviation of oppression and human suffering is a key dimension of educational purpose.  Schools must not hurt students – good schools don’t blame stuents for their failures  All positions including the critical pedagogy itself must be problematised and questioned.  Education must both promote emancipator change and the cultivation of the intellect - these goals should never be in conflict, they should be synergistic.  The politics of knowledge and the issues of epistemology are central to understanding the way power operates in educational institutions to perpetuate privilege and subjugate the marginalized.  Education often reflects the interest and the needs of new modes of colonialism and empire. Such dynamics must be exposed, Understood and acted upon a part of critical transformative praxis. Corresponding to the social constructivist perspectives, the present science curriculum focuses on the setting up on a community of scientific inquiry where the teacher represents the very powerful discourse of scientific culture and scientific way of viewing and dealing the world. This shared environment of knowledge constructions will certainly acknowledge the basic concepts of critical pedagogy. If the students are confronted with a critical
  • 7.
    approach to teachingthey are most likely to participate in the learning process with a critical perspective of their own. If students can able to connect what they learn in science classroom what they face in the outside world, they will gradually develop the power of challenging some social dominations in their society another way to promote critical pedagogy in classroom is issue based approach which sets a classroom that promote open dialogue, where students relay their options about scientific aspects of social issues. Because in critical pedagogy the subject for educational programme flow from learning own life situations, from the problems that lie at the heart of their concern
  • 8.
    CONCLUSION No onecan deny that teachers have a per found impact on students achievement. Constructivism was proposed by eminent scholars like John Dewey, Maria Montessori, Mahatma Gandhi, Piaget, and Vygotsky; by failed is penetrate the traditional pedagological practices till 1990s. Researchers like Driver, Navak, Posner and Van Glasefeld experimented on classroom constructivism and found its effects to help on students initiate for the construction of knowledge. The constructivist paradigm calls reform sin classroom interaction pattern, pedagogical strategies and instructional practices. The role of teacher is changed from transmitter of knowledge to facilitator and guide in the exploration of knowledge. The student role shift from passive receiver to one of knowledge creator. In constructivist classroom, students took initiative in the learning process and become scholar in designing experiments, tests, hypothesis and drawing conclusion to become a part of self created knowledge. Performance based participatory learning enabled classroom.
  • 9.
    REFERENCE  Salvin,E. Robert.(2003). Educational Psychology: theory and practice (7th Ed.) New York: Allyn and Bacon.  Vygot sky.L.(1978). Mind in society. The Development of higher Psychological process. MA: Hardvard University Press.  Wilson .B (1996). Constructivist learning environments. Englewood cliffs, New Jersy: Educational Technology Publications.  Sharma .S (2006) constructivist approaches to learning and teaching .NewDelhi : NCERT  Dr. Sivarajan.K , Prof.Faziluddin .A (2009) Science Education (7th Ed). Calicut University, Central Co-operative stores.