The document discusses different types of claims that can be made in academic arguments. It defines a claim as the main argument of an essay that must be supported by evidence. Descriptive thesis statements that merely describe a text rather than make an argument are noted as insufficient. The document then provides examples of different types of arguable claims, including claims of fact, definition, cause, resemblance, value, and policy. It emphasizes that a good claim is specific, complex, and invites debate on the issue.
ony is used to contradict what one says and what one does, or what one ... Imagery is visually descriptive language using the 5 This answer is long Explanation: A met
It is a powerpoint presentation that discusses about the lesson or topic: Literary Devices. It also talks about the definition and different types and examples about the types of Literary Devices.
Page 1 of 4 Courtesy the Odegaard Writing & Research Ce.docxbunyansaturnina
Page 1 of 4
Courtesy the Odegaard Writing & Research Center
http://www.depts.washington.edu/owrc
Adapted from UW Expository Writing Program handouts
Claims, Claims, Claims
A claim persuades, argues, convinces, proves, or provocatively suggests something to a
reader who may or may not initially agree with you. What most non-academics mean by
argument is usually a polar opposition or heated debate: I win/you lose; you‟re a
Democrat/I‟m a Republican; I‟m for the death penalty/you‟re a bleeding-heart liberal
against the death penalty; I‟m pro-choice/you‟re against choice. Though academic
arguments can be just as heated and draw on political, social, cultural, or personal positions
and experiences, academic claims are different—often more complex, nuanced, specific, and
detailed. Most academic argument is bounded by what is considered debatable or up for
inquiry within a discipline, acknowledging that some questions are already settled (though
that too may end up being debatable).
The „rules‟ of academic argument exclude the following as support:
—Because it is my personal opinion
—Because my friends or relatives think so or most people think so
—Because it‟s always been, it‟s tradition
—Because it‟s obvious
—Because it‟s morally right
What a Claim Is
A claim is the main argument of an essay. It is probably the single most important part
of an academic paper. The complexity, effectiveness, and quality of the entire paper
hinges on the claim. If your claim is boring or obvious, the rest of the paper probably
will be too.
A claim defines your paper‟s goals, direction, scope, and exigence and is supported by
evidence, quotations, argumentation, expert opinion, statistics, and telling details.
A claim must be argumentative. When you make a claim, you are arguing for a certain
interpretation or understanding of your subject.
A good claim is specific. It makes a focused argument (MTV‟s popularity is waning
because it no longer plays music videos) rather than a general one (MTV sucks).
Why Descriptive Thesis Statements are NOT Arguable Claims
Following are examples of descriptive thesis statements students write in high school. Each
is drawn from the top-scoring AP English Language and Composition papers posted on the
College Board website:
“To be a writer, one must have an elite understanding of diction, syntax and tone.
These literary devices are utilized by writers, including Eudora Welty, as a method
for expressing the message that they wish to convey to readers.”
“In the excerpt from One Writer‟s Beginnings, Eudora Welty conveys a positive tone
toward her childhood experience. She accomplishes this through the use of
descriptive diction, impressionable images, and unusual syntax.”
“The two passages given describe the swamp in very different lights. Although they
are in some ways familiar, the styles of the authors of these paragraphs are very
different.”
Page 2 o.
ony is used to contradict what one says and what one does, or what one ... Imagery is visually descriptive language using the 5 This answer is long Explanation: A met
It is a powerpoint presentation that discusses about the lesson or topic: Literary Devices. It also talks about the definition and different types and examples about the types of Literary Devices.
Page 1 of 4 Courtesy the Odegaard Writing & Research Ce.docxbunyansaturnina
Page 1 of 4
Courtesy the Odegaard Writing & Research Center
http://www.depts.washington.edu/owrc
Adapted from UW Expository Writing Program handouts
Claims, Claims, Claims
A claim persuades, argues, convinces, proves, or provocatively suggests something to a
reader who may or may not initially agree with you. What most non-academics mean by
argument is usually a polar opposition or heated debate: I win/you lose; you‟re a
Democrat/I‟m a Republican; I‟m for the death penalty/you‟re a bleeding-heart liberal
against the death penalty; I‟m pro-choice/you‟re against choice. Though academic
arguments can be just as heated and draw on political, social, cultural, or personal positions
and experiences, academic claims are different—often more complex, nuanced, specific, and
detailed. Most academic argument is bounded by what is considered debatable or up for
inquiry within a discipline, acknowledging that some questions are already settled (though
that too may end up being debatable).
The „rules‟ of academic argument exclude the following as support:
—Because it is my personal opinion
—Because my friends or relatives think so or most people think so
—Because it‟s always been, it‟s tradition
—Because it‟s obvious
—Because it‟s morally right
What a Claim Is
A claim is the main argument of an essay. It is probably the single most important part
of an academic paper. The complexity, effectiveness, and quality of the entire paper
hinges on the claim. If your claim is boring or obvious, the rest of the paper probably
will be too.
A claim defines your paper‟s goals, direction, scope, and exigence and is supported by
evidence, quotations, argumentation, expert opinion, statistics, and telling details.
A claim must be argumentative. When you make a claim, you are arguing for a certain
interpretation or understanding of your subject.
A good claim is specific. It makes a focused argument (MTV‟s popularity is waning
because it no longer plays music videos) rather than a general one (MTV sucks).
Why Descriptive Thesis Statements are NOT Arguable Claims
Following are examples of descriptive thesis statements students write in high school. Each
is drawn from the top-scoring AP English Language and Composition papers posted on the
College Board website:
“To be a writer, one must have an elite understanding of diction, syntax and tone.
These literary devices are utilized by writers, including Eudora Welty, as a method
for expressing the message that they wish to convey to readers.”
“In the excerpt from One Writer‟s Beginnings, Eudora Welty conveys a positive tone
toward her childhood experience. She accomplishes this through the use of
descriptive diction, impressionable images, and unusual syntax.”
“The two passages given describe the swamp in very different lights. Although they
are in some ways familiar, the styles of the authors of these paragraphs are very
different.”
Page 2 o.
DEVELOPING A WORKING THESIS FOUR MODELSWhat are some ways to deLinaCovington707
DEVELOPING A WORKING THESIS: FOUR MODELS
What are some ways to develop a working thesis? We suggest four models that may help you organize the information you gather in response to the question guiding your inquiry.
◼ The Correcting-Misinterpretations Model
This model is used to correct writers whose arguments you believe have misconstrued one or more important aspects of an issue. The thesis typically takes the form of a factual claim. Consider this example and the words we have underlined:
Although scholars have addressed curriculum to explain low achievement in schools, they have failed to fully appreciate the impact of limited resources to fund up-to-date textbooks, quality teachers, and computers. Therefore, reform in schools must focus on economic need as well as curriculum.
The clause beginning with “Although” lays out the assumption that many scholars make, that curriculum explains low educational achievement; the clause beginning with “they have failed” identifies the error those scholars have made by ignoring the economic reasons for low achievement in schools. Notice that the structure of the sentence reinforces the author’s position. He explains what he sees as the faulty assumption in a subordinate clause and reserves the main clause for his own position. The two clauses indicate that different authors hold conflicting opinions. Note that the writer could have used a phrase such as “they [scholars] have understated the impact of limited resources” as a way to reframe the problem in his thesis. In crafting your thesis, choose words that signal to readers that you are correcting others’ ideas, or even misinterpretations, without being dismissive. One more thing: Although it is a common myth that a thesis can be phrased in a single sentence (a legacy of the five-paragraph theme, we suspect), this example shows that a thesis can be written in two (or more) sentences.
◼ The Filling-the-Gap Model
The gap model points to what other writers may have overlooked or ignored in discussing a given issue. The gap model typically makes a claim of value. Consider this student’s argument that discussions of cultural diversity in the United States are often framed in terms of black and white. Our underlining indicates the gap the writer has identified:
If America is truly a “melting pot” of cultures, as it is often called, then why is it that stories and events seem only to be in black and white? Why is it that when history courses are taught about the period of the civil rights movement, only the memoirs of African Americans are read, like those of Melba Pattillo Beals and Ida Mae Holland? Where are the works of Maxine Hong Kingston, who tells the story of alienation and segregation in schools through the eyes of a Chinese child? African Americans were denied the right to vote, and many other citizenship rights; but Chinese Americans were denied even the opportunity to become citizens. I am not diminishing the issue of discrimination against Afri ...
English 111 Evaluation Essay
An Argument Essay About Discrimination
The Critical Race Theory Essay example
Argumentative Essay On Memorials
Constructing An Argument Sample
Argumentative Essay On Empathy
Argumentative Essay On Privacy
What Makes An Effective Argument Ineffective?
Examples Of Ontological Argument
Argumentative Essay On Plagiarism
Argumentative Essay On Veganism
Argumentative Essay On Climate Change
Argumentative Essay On Evolution
Rhetoric and Argument Essays
Argument On Forensics
Argumentative Essay On Social Networking
Argument Essay On Equality
Examples Of Valid Arguments
Research Paper---A Clear Line of ReasoningHere is a model oumyrljjcpoarch
Research Paper---A Clear Line of Reasoning
Here is a model outline for a research paper on Latinos and low graduation rates put together by a student named Susana. While Susana was required to submit an essay outline before submitting her essay, I decided not to require an essay outline from you for your research assignment
As you review Susana, keep in mind that no matter your controversial topic, your line of reasoning as you begin to write your essay should be as clear as the one evident in the model outline she has created. When Susana writes her research essay, she will follow her outline to make sure her line of reasoning is clear and adheres to the required pattern of argumentation we appropriated from Aristotle and which was used by Cicero--this outline was given earlier in the semester.
Susana Zumbado
Professor Munoz
English 101
10 November 2016
Research Paper Outline
Main Claim:
In this essay I will argue that charter schools can solve the problem of the low high school graduation rates of Latino males.
I. Introduction
Opening general statement regarding Latinos in education.
Focused thesis statement regarding charter schools as an answer to low high school graduation rates among Latino males..
II. Historical or Intellectual Background
Brief history of Latinos in American history.
Brief history of Latinos in education and past failed attempts to improve Latino student graduation rates.
III. Support for Main Claim
First of all, charter schools have the freedom to implement innovative teaching strategies that take into consideration Latino male learning styles.
Secondly, charter schools have the flexibility to create small learning communities such as career academies for professions Latino males are interested in..
Finally, charter schools have the freedom to implement character formation programs that cultivate personal values necesary for academic success..
IV. Counterargument and Refutation
Critics of my view would argue that irresponsible parents and a home environment hostile to education are the problem and that public schools work just fine.
However, this view is wrong because it is rooted in cultural and racial stereotyping.
V. Conclusion
Repeat main claim
Closing statement regarding the need for justice and equality in education.
Checklist for Research Paper
I. Have you adhered to MLA format?
Make sure that your essay is formated according to the Modern Language Association's guidelines. The information at the top needs to be complete, and the spacing, centering and margins have to be correct. Refer to Hacker's A Pocket Style Manual for MLA guidelines.
II. Have you offered a general introduction and a clear claim?
Make sure that your opening paragraph starts with
a general introduction
and ends with
a clear claim
that needs to be supported by reasons and evidence in the rest of your essay. It should be not be ambiguous or vague or awkward--it should be crystal clear a ...
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docxmigdalialyle
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of informal fallacy arguments. This assignment allows you to examine common fallacies in everyday reasoning.
Using the types of arguments listed in the textbook chapter “Flimsy Structures,” respond to the following:
Draft two original fallacies. Do not identify the fallacies, allow your peers to determine what fallacy your example represents.
Next, using the Internet, respond to the following:
Research a third informal fallacy not already covered in the text.
Identify and define the fallacy. For example, appeal to tradition, false dichotomy, etc.
Provide a citation for your source.
Construct an original fallacy argument of that type.
Support your statements with examples and scholarly references.
Write your initial response in 1–2 paragraphs. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.
By
Sunday, October 7, 2012
, post your response to the appropriate
Discussion Area
. Through
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
, review and comment on at least two peers’ responses. Identify their fallacies and suggest ways in which they can refine their arguments.
Grading Criteria and Rubric
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Initial Discussion Response
16
Discussion Participation
16
Writing Craftsmanship and Ethical Scholarship
8
Total:
40
CHAPTER 12
Flimsy Structures
This chapter could have been titled “
Un
warranted Inferences.” The following are certain infamous reasons given to support arguments—infamous because they mimic real support. There are two basic replies to these inferences: “So what?” or “What else?”
Abusing arguments may be among the world’s older professions. Proper names for many types of abuse are in Latin. I’ll deal only with the seven deadliest: inconsistency,
ad hominem
attacks, appeal to pity, begging the questions,
post hoc ergo propter hoc
, appeal (only) to the many, and straw man.
INCONSISTENCY
Two main ways of being inconsistent come to mind:
1.
Offering reasons that are contradictory
. For example, arguing that most people who strive for success do so out of hunger for love and admiration they didn’t get when growing up; and in the same book arguing that most people strive for success because they can afford to take the risk of failure, having been given a lot of encouragement and attention as children. Since encouragement and attention are tantamount to love and admiration, this argument is foundering on inconsistency unless the arguer makes a careful distinction between the pairs of terms
love-admiration
and
encouragement-attention
to explain this disparity.
2.
Offering reasons that contradict the conclusion
. For example, we should conserve on fuel because many of the elderly poor are dying from lack of heat in the winter. Given that reason, the conclusion would appear to be the opposite: that we should expend more fuel, at least on the elderly poor (unless some fiend is advocating killing off the elderly poor).
Enjoy Being on the Lookout
You can .
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
2. A claim persuades, argues,
convinces, proves, or provocatively
suggests something to a reader who
may or may not initially agree with
you.
3. What most non-academics mean by argument is usually a
polar opposition or heated debate: I win/you lose; you‟re a
Democrat/I‟m a Republican; I‟m for the death
penalty/you‟re a bleeding-heart liberal against the death
penalty; I‟m pro-choice/you‟re against choice. Though
academic arguments can be just as heated and draw on
political, social, cultural, or personal positions and
experiences, academic claims are different—often more
complex, nuanced, specific, and detailed. Most academic
argument is bounded by what is considered debatable or up
for inquiry within a discipline, acknowledging that some
questions are already settled (though that too may end up
being debatable).
4. The „rules‟ of academic argument exclude the
following as support:
—Because it is my personal opinion
—Because my friends or relatives think so or
most people think so
—Because it‟s always been, it‟s tradition
—Because it‟s obvious
—Because it‟s morally right
5. A claim is the main argument of an essay. It is
probably the single most important part of an
academic paper. The complexity, effectiveness, and
quality of the entire paper hinges on the claim. If
your claim is boring or obvious, the rest of the paper
probably will be too.
A claim defines your paper‟s goals, direction, scope,
and exigence and is supported by evidence,
quotations, argumentation, expert opinion, statistics,
and telling details.
6. A claim must be argumentative. When you make a
claim, you are arguing for a certain interpretation
or understanding of your subject.
A good claim is specific. It makes a focused
argument (MTV‟s popularity is waning because it
no longer plays music videos) rather than a general
one (MTV sucks).
7. Following are examples of descriptive thesis
statements students write in high school. Each is
drawn from the top-scoring AP English Language
and Composition papers posted on the College
Board website:
8. “To be a writer, one must have an elite
understanding of diction, syntax and tone. These
literary devices are utilized by writers, including
Eudora Welty, as a method for expressing the
message that they wish to convey to readers.”
“In the excerpt from One Writer‟s Beginnings,
Eudora Welty conveys a positive tone toward her
childhood experience. She accomplishes this
through the use of descriptive diction,
impressionable images, and unusual syntax.”
9. “The two passages given describe the swamp in
very different lights. Although they are in some
ways familiar, the styles of the authors of these
paragraphs are very different.”
These are NOT argumentative claims because the
writers‟ strategy here is to create a thesis
statement that is DESCRIPTIVE. The writer is
describing some aspect of the main text, and that‟s
all their doing. It‟s like saying, “Shakespeare‟s
Romeo and Juliet is a play about two star crossed
lovers and two warring families.”
10. Descriptive theses do not investigate anything,
critique anything, or analyze anything. Descriptive
claims also do not invite support and argument
from outside of the central text nor do descriptive
papers apply what has been learned in the central
text to other texts.
11. Opinion Argument/Arguable Claim
Twinkies are delicious. Twinkies taste better than
other snack cakes because
of their texture, their
creamy filling, and their
golden appearance.
12. Opinion Argument/Arguable Claim
I like dance music. Dance music has become
popular for reasons that
have nothing to do with the
quality of the
music;rather, the clear, fast
beats respond to the need of
people on amphetamines to
move, and to move quickly.
13. Opinion Argument/Arguable Claim
I think Virginia Woolf is
better than James Joyce.
Virginia Woolf is a more
effective writer than James
Joyce because she does not
rely on elaborate
language devices that
ultimately confuse and
alienate the reader.
14. Opinion Argument/Arguable Claim
The governor is a bad man. The governor has
continually done the
community a disservice by
mishandling money,
focusing on frivolous causes,
and failing to listen to his
constituents.
15. —An argument is supported by evidence, which
can be debated/challenged. Opinion is
supported by more opinion (and ultimately you end
up with something along the lines of “Well, just
because, okay?”).
—A claim can be substantiated with research,
evidence, testimony, and academic reasoning.
16. —A claim is something more than statement and
support: an arguable claim also goes on to
address the “so what?” question, the implications
and why we should care in the first place.
—Remember that not all claims are created equal,
and though a claim may be arguable, the best
claims are focused, specific, complex, and relevant.
17. In arguing a claim, you should always consider
potential counterclaims and counterarguments.
For instance, in response to the above claim about
the Seahawks, someone might say: “You‟re wrong.
The Hawks defensive problems last year were a
result of poor coaching on the part of the defensive
coordinator.” This counterclaim denies the validity
of my claim. Usually, it‟s important to address
counterclaims in your writing.
18.
19. Did it happen? Is it true? Does it exist?
Claims of fact appear to be statements of
fact, but remember that your claim needs to
be argumentative, so you want to make a
claim about which not everyone would
agree. Some claims of fact are not arguable
(e.g. The earth orbits the sun).
20. Consider what it is that makes the following
claims arguable:
NASA and the US government have spent more than
30 billion dollars to fake the Apollo moon landings
and to perpetuate this hoax.
(A claim of fact made by Bill Kaysing in his self-
published We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty
Billion Dollar Swindle)
21. A digital divide (inequitable access to technology)
between students from wealthier school districts
and students from poorer ones has added to the
problem of educational success among students
from the lower socioeconomic classes and students
from ethnic minorities.
22. Categorical Arguments: is X a Y?—where you and your
audience agree on the meaning of Y
Example: Frying or baking starchy foods can create high
levels of a potentially cancer-causing chemical called
acrylamide, so those French fries that you had at lunch today
(X) may be carcinogenic (Y).
Explanation: When you make a categorical claim, it’s
important that the majority of your audience agrees on the
meaning of the category. In the example above, the meaning
of the category (Y) should be easily agreed upon by most; a
carcinogen is something that causes cancer. Whether or not a
specific item (starchy foods; X) belongs in that category,
however, is open for debate.
23. What is it? (Is X a Y?, where the meaning of Y is
contested)
Unlike a categorical claim, in a true claim of
definition, the arguer can assume that the audience
agrees on the meaning of a term (X) that is being
placed into a certain category (Y), but it is the
definition of the category (Y) that is controversial or
arguable.
24. Example: Zygotes and embryos are human beings.
Explanation: The definition of a zygote (a diploid cell
resulting from the fusion of two haploid gametes; a fertilized
ovum) has been vastly agreed upon by members of the
community of biological scientists. Unless you’re a biological
scientist, making claims of definition about the meaning of
the terms zygote or embryo are not good choices for
argumentative topics.
25. The definition that is being called into question in the
example above is the meaning (definition) of the term
“human being” or the meaning of the concept of “life.”
Rather than requiring the author to make a scientific
judgment, defining the meaning of the term human or
the concept of life is more of a moral or philosophical
question—one that is much better suited to a college-
freshman-level composition assignment. (Please note:
this example came from an argument about embryonic
stemcell research rather than the overly common topic
of abortion about which so many college freshmen are
fond of writing and so many college writing teachers are
tired of reading.)
26. What caused it?
Is there a disagreement about a cause related to
your issue? Claims of cause seek to argue a cause
and effect relationship. Again, remember that
your claim needs to be arguable. Making a claim
that cigarette smoking often leads to lung cancer
is a causal claim, but not really an arguable one
by today’s standards. Consider the following
examples of causal claims that are still (at least
somewhat) debated.
27. Example: The widespread prescription of
antidepressants is directly responsible for an
increase in teen suicide rates.
Example: The popularity of Barbie among grade-
school-aged girls has contributed to the unrealistic
standards for beauty and thinness among teen girls
and young women.
28. How is it like something else?
Compare your topic to something that you believe your
audience will relate to easily as a way for your
audience to better understand your argument. It’s
often a successful strategy to argue that a truth about
something that so closely resembles your topic must
also be true for your topic. Resemblance arguments
are most often developed as a sub-claim that supports
the overall claim or thesis of an argument. At times,
however, one might choose to develop a resemblance
claim as the primary claim or thesis of an argument.
29. Example: As one admires the complex purpose, parts,
and motion of a wristwatch, knowing that it is the
watchmaker who is responsible for its design, so too we
should, when admiring the vastly more complex
purpose, parts, and motion of the universe, understand
that it too has an intelligent maker. (a paraphrase of
William Paley’s argument for intelligent design, 1802)
30. Is it good or bad?
Making a claim of value requires that
you evaluate your topic or an aspect of
your topic. Is it good or bad?
valuable or not valuable? desirable or
undesirable? and, of course, why?
31. Example: Global warming is the most pressing challenge
facing the world today.
Example: The right to bear arms in the US is an
important one.
Example: Physician assisted suicide is immoral.
32. What should we do about it?
Claims of policy suggest a solution to a
problem that has been defined or
described by an argument.
33. Example: Increased tax dollars for education of
prisoners will result in a decrease in the number of
released prisoners who re-offend.
Example: The sale of assault weapons should be
banned in the U.S.