The document provides an overview of key events leading up to the American Civil War, including the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, Bleeding Kansas, the Dred Scott decision, and the election of 1860. It then discusses the formation of the Confederate States of America and early battles of the Civil War from 1861-1862, including Bull Run, Shiloh, the Peninsula Campaign, Second Bull Run, and Antietam. Key figures discussed include Abraham Lincoln, Jefferson Davis, Ulysses S. Grant, Robert E. Lee, and Stonewall Jackson.
Nationalism and Sectionalism (1815-1824)Tom Richey
After the War of 1812, Americans found themselves in a nationalistic mood, leading to the nearly-unanimous re-election of James Monroe as president in 1820. However, sectional controversies loomed over Henry Clay's economic development proposals and free and slave states debated Missouri's admission into the Union. By 1824, the nationalist spirit was on the wane as the first party system collapsed and sectional candidates vied for the presidency.
For more PowerPoint presentations and instructional materials, visit www.tomrichey.net!
The Missouri Compromise was the result of the first debate in Congress concerning the spread of slavery, occurring in 1819-1820. When Missouri applied for admission into the Union, many in Congress objected to Missouri's admission as a slave state, supporting the Tallmadge Amendment that would have made gradual emancipation a condition for admission. When the Senate and the House could not agree on whether to pass the bill with or without the Tallmadge Amendment (the slave states had more influence in the Senate), Henry Clay proposed a compromise that brought Missouri into the Union as a slave state on the condition that Maine also be brought in as a free state and that all territories in the Louisiana Purchase north of the 36˚30 parallel be closed to slavery.
While many congratulated Henry Clay on a job well done, Thomas Jefferson worried greatly from his retirement at Monticello. He believed that the Missouri debate would only be the first of several debates regarding slavery and its expansion. While an opponent of the idea of slavery in the abstract, he did not see a path toward a practical end of slavery in the immediate future. With Jefferson's predictions coming true and the period between 1820-1860 being filled with debates concerning slavery, historians have often placed the Missouri Compromise at the beginning of the Antebellum (Before the War) Period.
For more PowerPoints for history and government courses, visit my website: http://www.tomrichey.net
Nationalism and Sectionalism (1815-1824)Tom Richey
After the War of 1812, Americans found themselves in a nationalistic mood, leading to the nearly-unanimous re-election of James Monroe as president in 1820. However, sectional controversies loomed over Henry Clay's economic development proposals and free and slave states debated Missouri's admission into the Union. By 1824, the nationalist spirit was on the wane as the first party system collapsed and sectional candidates vied for the presidency.
For more PowerPoint presentations and instructional materials, visit www.tomrichey.net!
The Missouri Compromise was the result of the first debate in Congress concerning the spread of slavery, occurring in 1819-1820. When Missouri applied for admission into the Union, many in Congress objected to Missouri's admission as a slave state, supporting the Tallmadge Amendment that would have made gradual emancipation a condition for admission. When the Senate and the House could not agree on whether to pass the bill with or without the Tallmadge Amendment (the slave states had more influence in the Senate), Henry Clay proposed a compromise that brought Missouri into the Union as a slave state on the condition that Maine also be brought in as a free state and that all territories in the Louisiana Purchase north of the 36˚30 parallel be closed to slavery.
While many congratulated Henry Clay on a job well done, Thomas Jefferson worried greatly from his retirement at Monticello. He believed that the Missouri debate would only be the first of several debates regarding slavery and its expansion. While an opponent of the idea of slavery in the abstract, he did not see a path toward a practical end of slavery in the immediate future. With Jefferson's predictions coming true and the period between 1820-1860 being filled with debates concerning slavery, historians have often placed the Missouri Compromise at the beginning of the Antebellum (Before the War) Period.
For more PowerPoints for history and government courses, visit my website: http://www.tomrichey.net
The Civil War1861-1865The Secession CrisisDecember 186.docxmehek4
The Civil War
1861-1865
The Secession Crisis
December 1860-April 1861
Secession Before Fort Sumter
South Carolina- December 20, 1860
Mississippi- January 9, 1861
Florida- January 10, 1861
Alabama-January 11, 1861
Georgia- January 19, 1861
Louisiana- January 26, 1861
Texas- February 1, 1861
The Nature of the Confederacy:
A Jeffersonian Experiment?
Confederate Constitution modeled after US Constitution with some important changes
President limited to one six-year term
Prohibited protectionist tariff
Prohibited government investment in internal improvements
States have power to remove Confederate officials with jurisdiction only in their state
Explicitly mentions slavery
No general welfare clause
Explicitly a compact of states
Great Seal of the Confederacy
Confederate President Jefferson Davis
Born June 3, 1808 in Kentucky, moved to Mississippi as a youth
Graduated from West Point in 1824
Left the army to become a Cotton Planter
Reentered the army to fight in the Mexican War
Appointed Senator from Mississippi in 1847 as a Democrat
Secretary of War under President Pierce, returning to the Senate in 1857
Opposed seccession and called the day he had to resign from the Senate as “the saddest day in my life”
President of the Confederacy in February 1861
The Nature of the Confederacy:
A Nation Based on Slavery
Multiple Confederate Secession Ordinances cited slavery as the principle cause
Confederate Constitution explicitly references and protects slavery
The Confederate states sent agents into the other slave states trying to convince them to join them based on the slavery issue
Confederate Vice-President Alexander Stephens was open about the Confederacy’s being based on slavery and white supremacy
Confederate Vice-President Alexander Stephens
Born February 11, 1812 to a poor Georgia family
Became a Lawyer in 1834
Elected to the House of Representatives in 1843 as a Whig
Unionist during the early crises of the 1850s
Became a Democrat after the fall of the Whigs
Ran the Democratic effort in the House to pass the Pro-Slavery Kansas Lecompton Constitution in 1858
Critical of Souther extremists
Delegate to the George Secession Convention in 1860 and voted against it
Elected to the Confederate Congress and then to the Vice-Presidency, taking the oath of office in February 1861
March 1861, the Cornerstone Speech: “Our new government is founded ...; its foundations are laid, its corner–stone rests, upon the great truth that, the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery — subordination to the superior race — is his natural and normal condition....This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great, philosophical, and moral truth.”
President Buchanan and President-Elect Lincoln on Southern Secession
President Buchanan took the position that secession was unconstitutional, but he could do nothing about it.
However, when Secretary of War John B. Floyd sent arms south in preparation for secessio ...
Lincoln, War, and the Slaughter of the American Working Class.docxsmile790243
Lincoln, War, and the Slaughter of the American Working Class
The American Civil War 1861-1865
The American Civil War is still, without doubt, the most traumatic experience in American History. Far more so than the American Revolution, the World Wars, and 9/11.
New estimates put the number of soldier deaths at 750,000 or above. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/science/civil-war-toll-up-by-20-percent-in-new-estimate.html
This does not include the many civilian deaths through disease, starvation, heartbreak, etc.
About 22 million lived in the North and 9 million in the South at the time of the war. There was about a 3.5 to 2.5 ratio of deaths North to South, but this means that the South lost a greater percentage of its population.
About 36,000 African American soldiers were killed.
In the following slides, we’ll recount the seminal events leading up to the war.
2
We can go back to the very foundations of the United States when the Fugitive Slave Clause (Article 4, Section 2, Clause 3) and the 3/5th Clause (Article 1, Section 2. Par. 3) of the Constitution effectively legalized slavery without explicitly mentioning slavery.
Also, Amendment 10 “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” leaves the issue of slavery and other legal, commercial, and social matters up to the states.
Arguments and ill feelings regarding these issues began almost immediately, and tensions almost led to violence in 1820 when the Missouri Compromise staved off revolt and kept the balance between slave state and free state representation.
Texas independence from Mexico followed by its attempt to join the U.S. created tensions before and after the delayed admission in December of 1845, during the Polk Administration.
Polk’s (murderous?) manipulation of international politics led to massive gains in U.S. territory. He gave Mexico little chance to a avoid war that resulted in the loss of the that nations northern half, and he negotiated for the acquisition and consolidation of the Northwest, completing the U.S. march to the Pacific.
This created all kinds of problems for the slavery balance. The Wilmot Proviso, which might have solved the problem, though admittedly in the non-extentionist favor, was rejected. When California asked to join the Union as a free state, it engendered yet another crisis. Half of the state was below the Missouri Compromise line. There was a call in Congress to split California into one free and one slave state.
Then Clay (again) proposed a compromise that delayed secession, but may have ensured it at the same time.
Battle of San Jacinto
April 21, 1836
1845
O’Sullivan
Popularizes Term
Manifest Destiny
Clays Compromise 1850
California Enters Union as a Free State
Territories to Have No Restrictions on Slavery
Enforce Fugitive Slave Law
No Slaves in D.C.
Recall from the last presen ...
Lecture/presentation exploring the election of 1860, the secession of the Southern states, and the reasons the South thought their departure would be unopposed.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
3. Supposed to settle issue of slavery in new
western territories
Compromise favored the Anti-
Slave folks (Abolitionists)
It was not strictly followed
5. The Solution: 1. CA enters as a Free
State
2. NM has no
restrictions on
slavery (no duh,
they are under the
36º30’ anyways)
3. Slave Trade (NOT
slavery) is outlawed
in DC
4. Congress will pass
6. So, what’s the next Conflict?Let’s look at that Fugitive Slave
7. The Fugitive Slave Act of
1850
•It required ALL citizens to
help catch runaway slaves
•The Act actually convinced
more Northerners to oppose
slavery
•Northern juries refused to
convict those who broke the
law
8. Next Hot Button Issue . . .KANSAS AND NEBRASKA
Let the People decide the
slavery issue?
9. The Kansas-Nebraska
Act
Enter Stephen
A. Douglas of
Illinois
Both KS and NE
wanted in as
states
Both states are
above the 36º30’
line
Both states would
therefore be free
states
10. The Kansas-Nebraska
ActDouglas had money
tied up in the
RailroadHe also wanted to be
President in the near
futureHe figured he needed
Southern support for
that run
So, here is the idea Douglas comes
up with
Throw out the Missouri Compromise
Let the people decide the issue of
slavery for themselves (popular
11. The Kansas-Nebraska
ActHe figures that the
people moving into these
territories will not vote
for slavery
But, he’s allowed the
people to decide
which the South
would support
And he has done
away with the
unpopular and
ineffective Missouri
Compromise
12. Bleeding Kansas
In 1855, KS elects a pro-
slavery legislature with the
help of thousands of Border
Ruffians, people who crossed
the border just to vote
This government kept
anti-slavery people
out of office and they
had no voice
Then, the anti-slavery
folks formed another
government and
violence erupted
13. Bleeding Kansas
Unfortunately,
Congress was split
over the issue and
nothing was done to
stop the violence
Finally, troops were sent
in and order restored –
John Brown and his
family murdered 4 pro-
slavery folks in the
night but, there was
this on both sides
14. The Dred Scott
DecisionDred Scott was a slave
who was taken with his
family to free territory
and then back to the
South
He took his case to the Supreme
Court to argue that since he
lived in “free” territory, he
should be a free man
The Supreme Court ruled
against him.
15. Dred Scott
The Court, led by
slaveholder Roger B.
Taney, ruled against Dred
Scott for two reasons
First was that Dred Scott was not
considered a citizen (since he was a
slave) and therefore had no standing in
court (could not sue).
Second was that slaves were considered
property and only their owner could grant
freedom. The govn’t can’t just take away
your property
16. The Election of 1860
The
Republicans
(newly formed
and anti-
slavery)
nominated
Abraham
Lincoln
Northern
Democrats
(popular
sovereignty decides
slavery) nominated
Stephen Douglas
Pro-slavery
Southern
Democrats
nominated
John C.
BreckinridgeConstitutional Union Party (neutral on
slavery) nominated John Bell
17. The Election of 1860
Abraham Lincoln won
the election without
carrying a single
Southern state. He
wasn’t even on the
ballot for most of them!
He did win all Northern
states.
The writing was clearly on the
wall for the South. They could
not overcome Northern (anti-
slave) power.
18. Southern Reaction
On December 20,
1860, South
Carolina became
the first state to
secede from the
Union!
Lincoln and the Republicans
promised not to disturb
slavery, but many in the South
didn’t trust them.
19. Southern Reaction
The stage was set for the formation of
the Confederate States of America when
in February of 1861, TX, LA, MS, AL,
FL and GA joined SC.
Later that year, AR, TN, NC
and VA made it 11 states to
join the CSA.
21. The Confederate States of
AmericaWhich Is the real flag of
the CSA?
First flag
“Stars and Bars”
Second National
Flag
Third National
Flag
Battle
Flag
Navy Jack
“Rebel” Flag
22. The Confederate States of
America
The CSA claimed it had the
right to secede because of
States Rights
The federal government, in
their mind, had refused to
enforce the Fugitive Slave Act
and thus had given the CSA
states the right to leave the
Union.
On February 4, 1861,
representatives met in
Montgomery, AL to form a
new government and elected
Jefferson Davis as their
President
23. The Civil War Begins
Back in Charleston, the
new CSA threatened to
bombard Fort Sumter
South Carolina had
given the commander of
the fort orders to leave
the harbor just outside
of Charleston
President Lincoln refused to recall his
troops and SC troops bombarded the
installation on April 12, 1861. The Federal
fort was surrendered on the 14th
and the
Civil War had begun.
24. The Civil War (1861-1865)
Who’s In and Who’s
Out?
•The Border States of
Missouri, Kentucky,
Maryland and Delaware
stayed with the Union (some
•Because of this, Tennessee,
Arkansas, Virginia and North
Carolina all joined the
Confederacy
•Lincoln issued a call for troops
in response to Fort Sumter’s
surrender
25. The Civil War (1861-1865)
Missouri and Kentucky
•Protected Union farmland to the
North
•They helped control the MS and OH
Rivers
The Border
StatesThe Border States were Slave States
but Lincoln needed them too much
Maryland
•w/o it, DC would be surrounded by
the CSADelaware
•Protects the ports of Philadelphia
29. Union Advantages
The Union had larger
population
More troops means the UnionMore troops means the Union
can withstand more casualtiescan withstand more casualties
and overcome poor militaryand overcome poor military
leadershipleadershipThe Union had more
industry
This means moreThis means more
weapons andweapons and
ammunitionammunition Abraham Lincoln
Like him or not, theLike him or not, the
Union couldn’t haveUnion couldn’t have
won without hiswon without his
leadership.leadership.
30. Confederate Advantages
The CSA had a cause
Much like our Revolution,Much like our Revolution,
the people were fighting tothe people were fighting to
be free from an oppressivebe free from an oppressive
governmentgovernment
Military Leadership
The South had more trainedThe South had more trained
officers and more trainedofficers and more trained
troops who had just finishedtroops who had just finished
fighting against Mexicanfighting against Mexican
troopstroops
Plus, the CSA had “home fieldPlus, the CSA had “home field
advantage”advantage”
31. #1 Blockade the Confederate
CoastlineThis keeps the troopThis keeps the troop
movement slow and keeps themovement slow and keeps the
South from exporting cottonSouth from exporting cotton
The Civil War (1861-1865)
Union war plan – Anaconda Plan
33. #2 Control the Mississippi
River
This cuts off theThis cuts off the
“West” from the rest“West” from the rest
of the CSAof the CSA
The Civil War (1861-1865)
Union war plan
34. It was a simple one-part
planFight a “defensive” war. Make itFight a “defensive” war. Make it
difficult enough for the Union to takedifficult enough for the Union to take
them back, the Union would simplythem back, the Union would simply
get tired of fighting and recognize theget tired of fighting and recognize the
CSA as a new nation.CSA as a new nation.
The Civil War (1861-1865)
Confederate war plan
Besides, they didn’t have theBesides, they didn’t have the
troop numbers to go on thetroop numbers to go on the
“offensive.”“offensive.”
35. The Civil War (1861-1865)
Who were these two sides?
The Confederates were broken into two
major Armies
The Army of Tennessee
•This was the combination of the
Armies of Kentucky, Mississippi
and Tennessee
•was headed by a few different
Generals
•Fought mostly in the Western
Campaigns
The Army of Northern Virginia
•Eventually was headed by Robert
E. Lee
•Fought mostly in the Eastern
Campaigns
36. The Civil War (1861-1865)
Who were these two sides?
The Union was broken into two major
Armies as well
The Army of the
Tennessee
•Fought in the Western
Theater
•Most notably headed by
Generals Grant and
Sherman
The Army of the Potomac
•Lincoln’s main Army
•Fought mostly in the Eastern
Campaigns
•Headed by a bunch of men - finally
Grant
37. The Civil War (1861-1865)
Early Years (1861-1862)
Some Early Battles and their importance
Date
Who
Won?
Battle Significance
July
1861
CSA
First Bull
Run
or
Manassas
First major battle of Civil War
Both sides disorganized
Stonewall Jackson - Confederate
hero
CSA can’t capitalize on Union
retreat
April
1862
Union Shiloh
General Grant emerges as leader in
West
CSA wins 1st
day, but
reinforcements from Nashville help
Union pull it out
From here, the Union takes
Corinth, MS and Memphis – starts
38. The Civil War (1861-1865)
Early Years (1861-1862)
Some Early Battles and their importance
Date
Who
Won?
Battle Significance
Marc
h
1862
CSA
Peninsular
Campaign
McClellan wastes too much time
training and building his troops
Robert E. Lee takes command of
CSA troops – Army of Virginia
Union fails to capture Richmond
Augus
t
1862
CSA
2nd
Bull
Run or
Manassas
Stonewall Jackson / Lee vs John
Pope
Richmond safe for now
CSA pushes to 20 miles from DC
Sept.
Union
Antietam
Lee goes on the offensive to try to
get aid from England or France
with a win
McClellan had actually found Lee’s
39. Death
Tolls
Death
Tolls
Top 5 Battles in Terms of
Casualties
Date Death Toll Battle / Total
Sept. 17
1862
12,410
U
13,724
C
Antietam
26,134
May 8-19
1864
18,399
U 9,000
C
Spotsylvania
27,399
May 1-4
1863
17,278
U
12,821
C
Chancellorsv
ille
30,099
Sept 19-
20 1863
16,170
U
18,454
C
Chickamaug
a
34,624
July 1-3
1863
23,049
U
28,063
C
Gettysburg
51,112
40. Did You Know?Did You Know?
Dog Tags
came
from the
Civil WarBecause the death toll was so
high, soldiers printed their
names and addresses on
handkerchiefs or paper, which
they pinned to their clothing
before going into battle.
41. Civil War Firsts that you may not have
known!
These things occurred for
the first time during our
Civil War
Machine gun
Steel Ships
Submarine
Snorkel breathing device
Anti-aircraft fire
Cigarette Tax
Commissioned Army
Chaplains
Department of Justice
(CSA)
Electronically exploded
bombs
Medal of Honor
Naval Torpedoes
Black US Army
Officer
(Major M.R. Delaney)
Battle PhotographyBattle Photography
Repeating RiflesRepeating Rifles
““Taps”Taps”
Income TaxIncome Tax
US Secret ServiceUS Secret Service
Anesthesia forAnesthesia for
surgerysurgeryNO, YOU DIDN’T KNOW
According to
The Civil War: Strange and
Fascinating Facts
by Burke Davis
43. Lincoln and his
commanders
George Meade
He was the last real
Commander of the
Army of the Potomac
And Finally in 1864And Finally in 1864
Ulysses S. GrantUlysses S. Grant
Commander of Federal TroopsCommander of Federal Troops
44. Abraham Lincoln
The Great Emancipator
Early Views on Slavery
Remember that Lincoln and mostRemember that Lincoln and most
Republicans were for a gradual end toRepublicans were for a gradual end to
slavery.slavery.
His main concern was with theHis main concern was with the
Border States who still ownedBorder States who still owned
slaves.slaves.
As the war moved on, the NorthAs the war moved on, the North
saw slavery as helping thesaw slavery as helping the
Confederate cause.Confederate cause.
45. Abraham Lincoln
The Great Emancipator
The Times They are a Changin’
There was growing pressure fromThere was growing pressure from
Free Blacks and Abolitionists in theFree Blacks and Abolitionists in the
North.North.
Lincoln also needs a way to keepLincoln also needs a way to keep
England and France out of this war.England and France out of this war.
He also wanted the President toHe also wanted the President to
make a stand on slavery, not themake a stand on slavery, not the
Congress.Congress.
46. Abraham Lincoln
The Great Emancipator
The Emancipation Proclamation
After victory at Antietam, LincolnAfter victory at Antietam, Lincoln
announced his intention to free theannounced his intention to free the
slaves of the South. On January 1,slaves of the South. On January 1,
1863 he issued the Emancipation1863 he issued the Emancipation
Proclamation, stating:Proclamation, stating:
“. . . all persons held as slaves within
any state . . . in rebellion against the
United States, shall be then,
47. Emancipation Proclamation
What did it do?
DID IT FREE THE SLAVES IN
THE UNION?
NO! The Border States kept their
slaves because they weren’t “in
rebellion.”
DID IT FREE THE SLAVES IN
THE SOUTH?
NOT REALLY Remember, the
CSA isn’t listening to Lincoln
because they are “in rebellion”
DUH
48. Emancipation Proclamation
What did it do?
DID IT GIVE BLACKS AND
SLAVES HOPE?
YES, any slave who made it to
Union controlled territory was set
free and over 100,000 did just
that.
Furthermore, there were about
200,000 African Americans who
served in the Union Armies and
Navies.
49. You may have
seen this movie
which is about the
54th
Massachusetts
A regiment that
was All-Black
(except the
commanding
officers)
Many of them were killed leading
a failed Union raid of Fort
Wagner outside of Charleston, SC
50. Emancipation Proclamation
What did it do?
Slaves wouldn’t get freedom until
much laterIn the 13th
Amendment, slavery
was ended, but that was in 1865.
And yet, this may be Lincoln’s
most brilliant maneuver in the
Civil War?
YOU BET! England and France
couldn’t sell support of the CSA
to their own people who were
51. Without freeing a
single slave, Abraham
Lincoln had officially
changed the Civil War
into being about
ending slavery.
52. The Civil War (1861-1865)
Things are going good for the
Confederates, or are they?
Fredericksburg (December 1862)
The Confederates are outnumbered,
but easily defeat Ambrose Burnside.
He resigns after the loss.
Chancellorsville (May 1863)
Now, Lee takes on Joseph Hooker.
The CSA wins, but Stonewall Jackson
is wounded by his own men and dies
a week later. BIG LOSS
These help Lee feel he should invade the North – it may
bring in Britain and France
53. The Civil War (1861-1865)
The Blue Years (1863-1865)
Battles that begin the end and their
importance
Date
Who
Won?
Battle Significance
July
1863
Union Gettysburg
This was the heaviest loss in lives
of the Civil War (over 51,000)
Known for Pickett’s Charge – a
very costly military mistake
With this loss, Lee would never
be able to invade the North again
BIG TURNING POINT IN THE
WAR
May –
July Union Vicksburg
Grant lays siege on the town for a
month
Union victory gains control of the
MS River
54. The Civil War (1861-1865)
The Blue Years (1863-1865)
Battles that begin the end and their
importance
Date
Who
Won?
Battle Significance
July –
Sept
1864
Union Atlanta
Start point for Sherman’s March
to the Sea (Savannah) –
introducing the idea of Total War
Aug
1864
Union Mobile Bay
David Farragut leads Union Navy
into bay and finally gives Union
total control of the Gulf of Mexico
News of this victory helps Lincoln
win the 1864 election
1864-
1865
Union Petersburg
Grant attacks this important rail
center near Richmond for
months
Eventually forces retreat of Lee’s