In this slide contains Investigation, reason, case study of OOS.
Presented by: K Venkatsai Preasad. (Department of pharmaceutical analysis and quality assurance).
RIPER, anantapur.
Role of quality system and audits in pharmamaceuticalganpat420
Introduction
cGMP Regulations
Quality Assurance Function
Quality Systems Approach
Management Responsibilities
Resources
Manufacturing Operations
Evaluation Activities
Transitioning to Quality Systems Approach
Audit Checklist for Drug Industry
The document discusses quality management systems and the six system inspection model used by the FDA to ensure compliance with cGMP regulations. It describes each of the six systems - quality system, production system, facilities and equipment system, laboratory control system, materials system, and packaging and labeling system. For each system, it provides an overview and lists the relevant cGMP subparts that govern inspections of that system. The goal is to help pharmaceutical manufacturers implement quality systems to meet FDA requirements.
cGMP Guidelines According to Schedule MANKUSH JADHAV
This document provides an overview of cGMP guidelines according to Schedule M. It defines cGMP and outlines key areas that must be addressed including personnel, premises, equipment, standard operating procedures, raw materials, self inspections, master formula records, batch manufacturing records, warehousing, and validation. The guidelines ensure quality products are consistently produced and that quality is built into every step of the manufacturing process.
OOS and OOT investigation is always a challenging task. This slide may help for a better understanding of investigation procedure according to regulatory requrement.
This document discusses in-process quality control (IPQC) tests for ointments. It describes IPQC as the process of controlling quality parameters during manufacturing from raw materials to final packaging. It then lists and describes 11 common IPQC tests conducted on ointments, including tests for appearance, drug content, pH, sensitivity, spreadability, absorption rate, extrudability, sterility, viscosity, medicament release rate, and uniformity of weight. The tests are designed to ensure the quality, safety and efficacy of ointment products during production.
Role of quality system and audits in pharmamaceuticalganpat420
Introduction
cGMP Regulations
Quality Assurance Function
Quality Systems Approach
Management Responsibilities
Resources
Manufacturing Operations
Evaluation Activities
Transitioning to Quality Systems Approach
Audit Checklist for Drug Industry
The document discusses quality management systems and the six system inspection model used by the FDA to ensure compliance with cGMP regulations. It describes each of the six systems - quality system, production system, facilities and equipment system, laboratory control system, materials system, and packaging and labeling system. For each system, it provides an overview and lists the relevant cGMP subparts that govern inspections of that system. The goal is to help pharmaceutical manufacturers implement quality systems to meet FDA requirements.
cGMP Guidelines According to Schedule MANKUSH JADHAV
This document provides an overview of cGMP guidelines according to Schedule M. It defines cGMP and outlines key areas that must be addressed including personnel, premises, equipment, standard operating procedures, raw materials, self inspections, master formula records, batch manufacturing records, warehousing, and validation. The guidelines ensure quality products are consistently produced and that quality is built into every step of the manufacturing process.
OOS and OOT investigation is always a challenging task. This slide may help for a better understanding of investigation procedure according to regulatory requrement.
This document discusses in-process quality control (IPQC) tests for ointments. It describes IPQC as the process of controlling quality parameters during manufacturing from raw materials to final packaging. It then lists and describes 11 common IPQC tests conducted on ointments, including tests for appearance, drug content, pH, sensitivity, spreadability, absorption rate, extrudability, sterility, viscosity, medicament release rate, and uniformity of weight. The tests are designed to ensure the quality, safety and efficacy of ointment products during production.
NEW ERA OF DRUG PRODUCT: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGESganpat420
Abstract
Introduction
Global pharmaceutical industry
Indian pharmaceutical industry
Indian Pharmaceutical Market
Opportunities
Challenges
Conclusion
References
Auditing of Granulation Operation in Dry Production AreaPritam Kolge
Auditing of Granulation Operation in Dry Production Area.....
This topic comes under Audits and Regulatory Compliance....
This is useful for M.Pharm (Pharaceutical Quality Assurance) Students who studying in First year sem II....
This Presentation Contain following...
#Objectives
#Fundamentals of Granulation
#Reasons for Granulation
#Methods of Granulation
#Agglomeration
#Fundamentals and Audit of Dry Granulation
#Steps in Dry Granulation
#Fundamentals and Audit of Fluid Bed Granulation
#Scale-Up of Fluid bed Granulation
#High share granulation-Fundamentals, Audit and Scale-Up
#Overview and Comparison of Different Granulating Techniques
#Audit of Mixing and Blending, Wet granulation, Wet milling, Drying, Milling
#Conclusion
#References
Thanks For Help and Guidance of Mr. D.P.Mali Sir
USFDA guidelines on process validation a life cycle approachRx Ayush Sharma
The document summarizes the US FDA's 2011 guidance on process validation, which outlines a lifecycle approach. It discusses the three stages of process validation according to the guidance: (1) Process Design which defines the commercial process based on development, (2) Process Qualification which evaluates the process's capability for commercial manufacturing, and (3) Continued Process Verification which gains ongoing assurance that the process remains in control during routine production. The lifecycle approach integrates validation strategies from previous guidelines and emphasizes continual process improvement, understanding sources of variation, and controlling variation to ensure consistent quality.
This document provides information on aseptic processing technology and quality control testing for various sterile pharmaceutical dosage forms including ointments, suspensions, emulsions, and sterile solutions. It discusses cleanroom classifications, manufacturing processes, and in-process quality control tests for content uniformity, clarity, leakage, extractable volume, sterility, consistency, penetration, irritation potential, sedimentation, redispersibility, particle size, viscosity, and zeta potential.
Role of quality systems and audits in pharmaceutical manufacturing environmentMalay Pandya
By regulation, appropriate practice, and common sense, quality assurance (QA) is a critical function in the pharmaceutical manufacturing environment. The need for an independent unit to audit and comment on the appropriate application of standard operating procedures, master batch records, procedures approved in product applications, and the proper functioning of the quality control (QC) unit is paramount.
This helps assure that products are manufactured reliably, with adherence to approved specifications, and that current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) are maintained in conformance to regulation, both in the facility in general and the microenvironment of each product ’s manufacturing sequence.
This document provides information about vendor qualification procedures in the pharmaceutical industry. It begins with definitions of key terms like vendor and qualification. It then describes the types of vendors, including business-to-business and business-to-customer. It outlines a classification system for vendors from Category 1 to 4 based on risk. The document details the seven steps for vendor selection and qualification procedures for raw material and packaging material vendors. It provides guidance on inclusion of vendors in the approved vendor list and reasons for exclusion from the list, along with corrective actions.
Cleaning validation is important to ensure safety and prevent contamination during pharmaceutical production. It involves collecting data to prove cleaning procedures consistently remove residues to acceptable limits. Key aspects of validation include defining cleaning procedures, acceptance criteria, sampling methods, and analytical techniques. Validation should continue if procedures or products change. Overall, cleaning validation demonstrates equipment is suitably cleaned between batches to maintain quality as required by cGMP regulations.
Auditing of vendors and production departmentArpitSuralkar
This document outlines procedures for auditing vendors that produce capsules and sterile products. It discusses the benefits of vendor audits such as cost savings, process improvements, and risk reduction. The document describes the vendor selection process and provides a checklist for auditing vendors, which includes evaluating their premises, personnel, documentation, validation procedures, samples, stability studies, and drug recall processes. The goal of vendor audits is to inspect vendors' quality management systems and ensure they meet requirements for producing capsules and sterile medical products.
The document discusses current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) according to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It provides an overview of cGMP principles and requirements, including proper facilities and equipment design, documentation practices, and quality control. The document also summarizes key cGMP regulations and guidelines for manufacturing, processing, packaging, holding, testing, and distributing drug products. It outlines the important documents, facilities, equipment, production processes, and quality systems that must be in place to ensure consistent production of safe, effective pharmaceuticals.
Auditing of vendors and production departmentPRANJAY PATIL
The document discusses vendor audits in the pharmaceutical industry. It provides details on the objectives, parameters, and steps of conducting a vendor audit. The key points are:
- Vendor audits assess a vendor's quality management system, practices, documentation, and adherence to standards to ensure their products and services meet requirements.
- Important parameters reviewed include ISO certifications, manufacturing facilities, packaging and labeling standards, and data handling procedures.
- The goals are to evaluate quality control measures and management commitment to quality standards required by regulations.
- Conducting vendor audits helps reduce costs and risks by gaining insight into supplier processes and compliance.
The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) is responsible for protecting and promoting public health by ensuring the safety and effectiveness of human drugs. CDER oversees new drug development and reviews marketing applications, monitors drug safety after approval, and ensures quality in manufacturing. CDER's mission is to ensure that drugs are safe and effective for their intended use through activities like reviewing new drug applications, communicating drug information to health professionals and consumers, and facilitating innovation in drug development.
This document describes quality control tests performed on suppositories, including weight variation testing to ensure suppositories are uniformly sized, hardness testing to evaluate structural integrity, disintegration testing to assess dissolution rate, and drug content testing to verify active ingredient levels. Dissolution testing was also conducted using a basket apparatus to analyze drug release over time in vitro. Finally, short term stability studies were performed on promising formulations by storing samples at room temperature and refrigeration for 6 weeks and testing for drug content and dissolution profile.
An out of specification (OOS) occurs when analytical results fall outside established specification ranges. There are guidelines from organizations like MHRA, CDER, and PIC/S for handling OOS events. OOS can occur during stability studies, finished products, or raw materials due to laboratory errors, process issues, or sample homogeneity problems. Investigations follow a phased approach starting with the quality control laboratory and then involving manufacturing operations if needed. The fate of an OOS batch may include reprocessing, reworking, or destruction depending on the investigation conclusions.
SUPAC, BACPAC, Post Marketing SurveillanceMANIKANDAN V
This document discusses various guidelines related to product development and technology transfer in the pharmaceutical industry. It covers SUPAC, BACPAC, and post-marketing surveillance. SUPAC provides guidance for scale-up and post-approval changes, categorizing changes into different levels based on their potential impact. BACPAC guidance addresses post-approval changes for bulk active pharmaceutical ingredients. Post-marketing surveillance involves monitoring adverse drug events after approval to ensure ongoing safety and effectiveness.
The document is a presentation on post-approval changes to bulk active chemicals. It discusses FDA guidance called BACPAC (Bulk Active Chemicals & Post Approval Changes) which provides recommendations for post-approval changes to drug substance synthesis, including site, scale and equipment changes as well as specification and manufacturing process changes. The guidance covers assessing equivalence after changes and determining the appropriate reporting category based on the potential effects of changes.
This document discusses supplemental new drug applications (SNDA) which are submitted to the FDA for approval of changes to approved drugs. It defines what types of changes require an SNDA, including manufacturing changes, formulation changes, and labeling changes. It categorizes changes as major, moderate, or minor based on their potential impact on quality, safety, or efficacy. Major changes require prior approval, moderate changes require 30 days' notice, and minor changes are reported annually. Examples are provided for each category of change.
This document provides guidelines for developing specifications for new drug substances and products according to ICH Q6A. It discusses universal and specific tests/criteria that should be included for drug substances and products, such as identification, description, assay, impurities, dissolution, disintegration, content uniformity, and microbial limits. The document gives acceptance criteria and justification for key tests like dissolution, discussing how to set Q values and limits based on biobatch results and BCS classification. It also provides guidance on other tests for oral liquids, parenterals and solid dosage forms.
in this slide contains introduction, types, classification, review team, requirement of protocol and process of Investigated New Drug Application (IND).
Presented by: RAVI SHANKAR D (Department of pharmaceutical analysis and quality assurance),
RIPER, anantapur.
NEW ERA OF DRUG PRODUCT: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGESganpat420
Abstract
Introduction
Global pharmaceutical industry
Indian pharmaceutical industry
Indian Pharmaceutical Market
Opportunities
Challenges
Conclusion
References
Auditing of Granulation Operation in Dry Production AreaPritam Kolge
Auditing of Granulation Operation in Dry Production Area.....
This topic comes under Audits and Regulatory Compliance....
This is useful for M.Pharm (Pharaceutical Quality Assurance) Students who studying in First year sem II....
This Presentation Contain following...
#Objectives
#Fundamentals of Granulation
#Reasons for Granulation
#Methods of Granulation
#Agglomeration
#Fundamentals and Audit of Dry Granulation
#Steps in Dry Granulation
#Fundamentals and Audit of Fluid Bed Granulation
#Scale-Up of Fluid bed Granulation
#High share granulation-Fundamentals, Audit and Scale-Up
#Overview and Comparison of Different Granulating Techniques
#Audit of Mixing and Blending, Wet granulation, Wet milling, Drying, Milling
#Conclusion
#References
Thanks For Help and Guidance of Mr. D.P.Mali Sir
USFDA guidelines on process validation a life cycle approachRx Ayush Sharma
The document summarizes the US FDA's 2011 guidance on process validation, which outlines a lifecycle approach. It discusses the three stages of process validation according to the guidance: (1) Process Design which defines the commercial process based on development, (2) Process Qualification which evaluates the process's capability for commercial manufacturing, and (3) Continued Process Verification which gains ongoing assurance that the process remains in control during routine production. The lifecycle approach integrates validation strategies from previous guidelines and emphasizes continual process improvement, understanding sources of variation, and controlling variation to ensure consistent quality.
This document provides information on aseptic processing technology and quality control testing for various sterile pharmaceutical dosage forms including ointments, suspensions, emulsions, and sterile solutions. It discusses cleanroom classifications, manufacturing processes, and in-process quality control tests for content uniformity, clarity, leakage, extractable volume, sterility, consistency, penetration, irritation potential, sedimentation, redispersibility, particle size, viscosity, and zeta potential.
Role of quality systems and audits in pharmaceutical manufacturing environmentMalay Pandya
By regulation, appropriate practice, and common sense, quality assurance (QA) is a critical function in the pharmaceutical manufacturing environment. The need for an independent unit to audit and comment on the appropriate application of standard operating procedures, master batch records, procedures approved in product applications, and the proper functioning of the quality control (QC) unit is paramount.
This helps assure that products are manufactured reliably, with adherence to approved specifications, and that current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) are maintained in conformance to regulation, both in the facility in general and the microenvironment of each product ’s manufacturing sequence.
This document provides information about vendor qualification procedures in the pharmaceutical industry. It begins with definitions of key terms like vendor and qualification. It then describes the types of vendors, including business-to-business and business-to-customer. It outlines a classification system for vendors from Category 1 to 4 based on risk. The document details the seven steps for vendor selection and qualification procedures for raw material and packaging material vendors. It provides guidance on inclusion of vendors in the approved vendor list and reasons for exclusion from the list, along with corrective actions.
Cleaning validation is important to ensure safety and prevent contamination during pharmaceutical production. It involves collecting data to prove cleaning procedures consistently remove residues to acceptable limits. Key aspects of validation include defining cleaning procedures, acceptance criteria, sampling methods, and analytical techniques. Validation should continue if procedures or products change. Overall, cleaning validation demonstrates equipment is suitably cleaned between batches to maintain quality as required by cGMP regulations.
Auditing of vendors and production departmentArpitSuralkar
This document outlines procedures for auditing vendors that produce capsules and sterile products. It discusses the benefits of vendor audits such as cost savings, process improvements, and risk reduction. The document describes the vendor selection process and provides a checklist for auditing vendors, which includes evaluating their premises, personnel, documentation, validation procedures, samples, stability studies, and drug recall processes. The goal of vendor audits is to inspect vendors' quality management systems and ensure they meet requirements for producing capsules and sterile medical products.
The document discusses current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) according to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It provides an overview of cGMP principles and requirements, including proper facilities and equipment design, documentation practices, and quality control. The document also summarizes key cGMP regulations and guidelines for manufacturing, processing, packaging, holding, testing, and distributing drug products. It outlines the important documents, facilities, equipment, production processes, and quality systems that must be in place to ensure consistent production of safe, effective pharmaceuticals.
Auditing of vendors and production departmentPRANJAY PATIL
The document discusses vendor audits in the pharmaceutical industry. It provides details on the objectives, parameters, and steps of conducting a vendor audit. The key points are:
- Vendor audits assess a vendor's quality management system, practices, documentation, and adherence to standards to ensure their products and services meet requirements.
- Important parameters reviewed include ISO certifications, manufacturing facilities, packaging and labeling standards, and data handling procedures.
- The goals are to evaluate quality control measures and management commitment to quality standards required by regulations.
- Conducting vendor audits helps reduce costs and risks by gaining insight into supplier processes and compliance.
The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) is responsible for protecting and promoting public health by ensuring the safety and effectiveness of human drugs. CDER oversees new drug development and reviews marketing applications, monitors drug safety after approval, and ensures quality in manufacturing. CDER's mission is to ensure that drugs are safe and effective for their intended use through activities like reviewing new drug applications, communicating drug information to health professionals and consumers, and facilitating innovation in drug development.
This document describes quality control tests performed on suppositories, including weight variation testing to ensure suppositories are uniformly sized, hardness testing to evaluate structural integrity, disintegration testing to assess dissolution rate, and drug content testing to verify active ingredient levels. Dissolution testing was also conducted using a basket apparatus to analyze drug release over time in vitro. Finally, short term stability studies were performed on promising formulations by storing samples at room temperature and refrigeration for 6 weeks and testing for drug content and dissolution profile.
An out of specification (OOS) occurs when analytical results fall outside established specification ranges. There are guidelines from organizations like MHRA, CDER, and PIC/S for handling OOS events. OOS can occur during stability studies, finished products, or raw materials due to laboratory errors, process issues, or sample homogeneity problems. Investigations follow a phased approach starting with the quality control laboratory and then involving manufacturing operations if needed. The fate of an OOS batch may include reprocessing, reworking, or destruction depending on the investigation conclusions.
SUPAC, BACPAC, Post Marketing SurveillanceMANIKANDAN V
This document discusses various guidelines related to product development and technology transfer in the pharmaceutical industry. It covers SUPAC, BACPAC, and post-marketing surveillance. SUPAC provides guidance for scale-up and post-approval changes, categorizing changes into different levels based on their potential impact. BACPAC guidance addresses post-approval changes for bulk active pharmaceutical ingredients. Post-marketing surveillance involves monitoring adverse drug events after approval to ensure ongoing safety and effectiveness.
The document is a presentation on post-approval changes to bulk active chemicals. It discusses FDA guidance called BACPAC (Bulk Active Chemicals & Post Approval Changes) which provides recommendations for post-approval changes to drug substance synthesis, including site, scale and equipment changes as well as specification and manufacturing process changes. The guidance covers assessing equivalence after changes and determining the appropriate reporting category based on the potential effects of changes.
This document discusses supplemental new drug applications (SNDA) which are submitted to the FDA for approval of changes to approved drugs. It defines what types of changes require an SNDA, including manufacturing changes, formulation changes, and labeling changes. It categorizes changes as major, moderate, or minor based on their potential impact on quality, safety, or efficacy. Major changes require prior approval, moderate changes require 30 days' notice, and minor changes are reported annually. Examples are provided for each category of change.
This document provides guidelines for developing specifications for new drug substances and products according to ICH Q6A. It discusses universal and specific tests/criteria that should be included for drug substances and products, such as identification, description, assay, impurities, dissolution, disintegration, content uniformity, and microbial limits. The document gives acceptance criteria and justification for key tests like dissolution, discussing how to set Q values and limits based on biobatch results and BCS classification. It also provides guidance on other tests for oral liquids, parenterals and solid dosage forms.
in this slide contains introduction, types, classification, review team, requirement of protocol and process of Investigated New Drug Application (IND).
Presented by: RAVI SHANKAR D (Department of pharmaceutical analysis and quality assurance),
RIPER, anantapur.
The document discusses in-process quality control (IPQC) in the pharmaceutical manufacturing process. It defines IPQC and introduces its importance in enforcing quality standards. The objectives of IPQC are outlined as optimizing processes, monitoring operations, and inspecting materials and equipment. Key aspects of IPQC addressed include sampling methods, in-process testing parameters, packaging controls, maintaining documentation, and releasing batches. The conclusion emphasizes that IPQC ensures product quality and conformity through monitoring critical stages of production.
In this slide contains definition, importance, benefits of annual product review.
Presented by: Ravi Sanker babu .D.V (Department of pharmaceutical analysis and quality assurance).
RIPER, anantapur.
In this slide contains introduction, qualification, preventive maintenance, requalification method.
Presented by: Malarvannan M (Department of pharmaceutical analysis).RIPER, anantapur
This document outlines a seminar presentation on Quality by Design (QbD) in pharmaceutical development. It discusses key QbD concepts like the target product profile, critical quality attributes, risk assessment, design space, and control strategy. Tools used in QbD like design of experiments and process analytical technology are also summarized. The document provides an overview of the ICH Q8 guideline on pharmaceutical development and how QbD is viewed by regulators and the pharmaceutical industry.
The document discusses quality by design (QbD) in pharmaceutical development. It defines QbD and describes its objectives to achieve quality products through a systematic approach involving predefined targets and process understanding. The key aspects of QbD include defining target product and quality profiles, identifying critical quality attributes and material/process parameters through risk assessment, establishing a design space, and implementing a control strategy with life cycle management. Various tools used in QbD such as design of experiments are also outlined.
In this slide contains definition, validation plan, types of Qualification of Dry Powder Mixture.
Presented by: Ravi Sanker babu .D.V (Department of pharmaceutical analysis and quality assurance).RIPER, anantapur
In this slide contains Calibration vs Qualification and phases of qualification.
Presented by: A.Siddartha Tharun Teja. (Department of industrial pharmacy).
RIPER, anantapur.
The document presents information on Quality by Design (QbD), a systematic approach to pharmaceutical development that emphasizes product and process understanding. It defines key QbD concepts like target product profile, quality target product profile, critical quality attributes, critical material attributes, and critical process parameters. The benefits of QbD for industry include eliminating batch failures and empowering technical staff. Design space, design of experiments, and process analytical techniques are important tools in QbD. Regulatory agencies support the QbD approach for developing scientific understanding and continuous improvement.
In this slide contains Introduction, levels of cleaning, mechanism, sampling method of cleaning validation.
Presented by: P. VENKATESH (Department of pharmaceutical analysis).RIPER, anantapur
In this slide contains details about Pharmaceutical validation of water system
Presented by: K VENKATSAI PRASAD (Department of pharmaceutical analysis and quality assurance).RIPER, anantapur
In this slide contains definition, validation method of HVAC
Presented by: V NABI RASOOL (Department of pharmaceutical analysis and quality assurance).RIPER, anantapur.
The document presents a case study on the recall of Telmisartan tablets by Alembic Pharmaceuticals Inc. due to mislabeling. The recalled lot of Telmisartan 20mg tablets was found to actually contain 40mg tablets. This posed risks like low blood pressure and kidney or potassium issues for patients. The recall was initiated in the US in March 2021 after the mistake was identified. The case study analyzes the details of the recall according to US FDA guidelines and provides a QA summary on post-marketing monitoring importance to prevent such errors.
The document discusses the qualification of high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC). It describes the four types of qualification: design qualification, installation qualification, operation qualification, and performance qualification. Design qualification verifies specifications and review methods. Installation qualification documents compliance at installation. Operation qualification documents consistent performance within operating ranges. Performance qualification ascertains the instrument is suitable for specific analytical tasks. The document then provides examples of tests to check HPTLC performance, including linearity of spotting, reproducibility of spotting, and detection capacity.
In this slide contains plan, steps, tool involved in risk assessment.
Presented by: K VENKATSAI PRASAD (Department of pharmaceutical analysis and quality assurance).RIPER, anantapur
In this slide contains the deep explanation of Methods of Determination for Drug-Excipient Compatibility Studies.
Presented by: G.Aravind Kumar (Department of industrial pharmacy),
RIPER, anantapur.
Introduction to Concepts of Similarity and Difference factors,
Importance of dissolution profile comparison,
Objective of dissolution profile comparison,
Method to compare dissolution profile , f1 & f2 Comparison
Presented By
N. Poojitha
Department of Pharmaceutics
Similar to Case study on Out of Specification (OOS). (20)
The document describes the development of a new magnetic solid phase extraction (MSPE) adsorbent called polyDOPA@Ag-MNPs for the analysis of trace beta-blockers in biological samples. PolyDOPA@Ag-MNPs were synthesized by reducing silver ions on the surface of magnetic nanoparticles coated with poly(3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine). The adsorbent was able to isolate beta-blockers from sample matrices using a magnetic field. Optimization of the MSPE method identified pH 7, 2 minutes adsorption time, 4 mg polyDOPA@Ag-MNPs, methanol containing 1% acetic acid as the eluent, 2 minutes elution
JOURNAL CLUB PRESENTATION (20L81S0402-PA & QA)
Presented by: K VENKATSAI PRASAD (Department of pharmaceutical analysis and quality assurance).RIPER, anantapur
In this slide contains Study of Quality of Raw Materials and General methods of analysis of Raw materials used in cosmetic manufacture as per BSI
Presented by: P.PAVAN KALYAN (Department of pharmaceutical analysis).RIPER, anantapur
More from Raghavendra institute of pharmaceutical education and research . (20)
BREEDING METHODS FOR DISEASE RESISTANCE.pptxRASHMI M G
Plant breeding for disease resistance is a strategy to reduce crop losses caused by disease. Plants have an innate immune system that allows them to recognize pathogens and provide resistance. However, breeding for long-lasting resistance often involves combining multiple resistance genes
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
Or: Beyond linear.
Abstract: Equivariant neural networks are neural networks that incorporate symmetries. The nonlinear activation functions in these networks result in interesting nonlinear equivariant maps between simple representations, and motivate the key player of this talk: piecewise linear representation theory.
Disclaimer: No one is perfect, so please mind that there might be mistakes and typos.
dtubbenhauer@gmail.com
Corrected slides: dtubbenhauer.com/talks.html
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
Nucleophilic Addition of carbonyl compounds.pptxSSR02
Nucleophilic addition is the most important reaction of carbonyls. Not just aldehydes and ketones, but also carboxylic acid derivatives in general.
Carbonyls undergo addition reactions with a large range of nucleophiles.
Comparing the relative basicity of the nucleophile and the product is extremely helpful in determining how reversible the addition reaction is. Reactions with Grignards and hydrides are irreversible. Reactions with weak bases like halides and carboxylates generally don’t happen.
Electronic effects (inductive effects, electron donation) have a large impact on reactivity.
Large groups adjacent to the carbonyl will slow the rate of reaction.
Neutral nucleophiles can also add to carbonyls, although their additions are generally slower and more reversible. Acid catalysis is sometimes employed to increase the rate of addition.
ESR spectroscopy in liquid food and beverages.pptxPRIYANKA PATEL
With increasing population, people need to rely on packaged food stuffs. Packaging of food materials requires the preservation of food. There are various methods for the treatment of food to preserve them and irradiation treatment of food is one of them. It is the most common and the most harmless method for the food preservation as it does not alter the necessary micronutrients of food materials. Although irradiated food doesn’t cause any harm to the human health but still the quality assessment of food is required to provide consumers with necessary information about the food. ESR spectroscopy is the most sophisticated way to investigate the quality of the food and the free radicals induced during the processing of the food. ESR spin trapping technique is useful for the detection of highly unstable radicals in the food. The antioxidant capability of liquid food and beverages in mainly performed by spin trapping technique.
ANAMOLOUS SECONDARY GROWTH IN DICOT ROOTS.pptxRASHMI M G
Abnormal or anomalous secondary growth in plants. It defines secondary growth as an increase in plant girth due to vascular cambium or cork cambium. Anomalous secondary growth does not follow the normal pattern of a single vascular cambium producing xylem internally and phloem externally.
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvementIshaGoswami9
As the population is increasing and will reach about 9 billion upto 2050. Also due to climate change, it is difficult to meet the food requirement of such a large population. Facing the challenges presented by resource shortages, climate
change, and increasing global population, crop yield and quality need to be improved in a sustainable way over the coming decades. Genetic improvement by breeding is the best way to increase crop productivity. With the rapid progression of functional
genomics, an increasing number of crop genomes have been sequenced and dozens of genes influencing key agronomic traits have been identified. However, current genome sequence information has not been adequately exploited for understanding
the complex characteristics of multiple gene, owing to a lack of crop phenotypic data. Efficient, automatic, and accurate technologies and platforms that can capture phenotypic data that can
be linked to genomics information for crop improvement at all growth stages have become as important as genotyping. Thus,
high-throughput phenotyping has become the major bottleneck restricting crop breeding. Plant phenomics has been defined as the high-throughput, accurate acquisition and analysis of multi-dimensional phenotypes
during crop growing stages at the organism level, including the cell, tissue, organ, individual plant, plot, and field levels. With the rapid development of novel sensors, imaging technology,
and analysis methods, numerous infrastructure platforms have been developed for phenotyping.
1. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 1
A Seminar as a part of curricular requirement
for I year M. Pharm I semester
Presented by
K.VENKATASAIPRASAD. (20L81S0402).
M.PHARM
Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance.
Under the guidance/Mentorship of
Dr. P. Ramalingam., Ph.D.
Director- R&D Division,
Professor of pharmaceutical analysis
and medicinal chemistry
CASE STUDY
ON
OUT OF SPECIFICATION(OOS)
2. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 2
S.NO CONTENT
1
Introduction
2
Reason for OOS
3
OOS investigation
4
Case study 1
5
Outcomes
6
References
Content Table
3. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 3
OOS(OUT OF SPECIFICATION):
The term OOS results includes all test results that fall outside the
specification or acceptance criteria established in drug applications,
drug master files, official compendia, or by the manufacturer.
TWO MAOR ISSUES:
• What test results?
• What specifications?
Introduction
4. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 4
• There are lot of guidelines are available for defining and handle the
OOS products/materials/batches as:
MHRA guideline for OOS
CDER guideline for OOS
PIC/S guideline for OOS
5. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 5
• The OOS may be observed during the analysis of:
Stability study
Finished API
Intermediates
In-process
Raw materials
Packing materials
6. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 6
• OOS found due to the following reasons but not limited to:
Reasons
OOS
Laboratory
errors
Process
Related
Sample
homogeneity
7. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 7
Laboratory errors:
•Laboratory errors
Method of
analysis
Use of non
calibrated
instruments
Error in
calculation
Analyst
error
Instrument
failure
8. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 8
Process related:
•Process related
Operator
error
Equipment
failure
Deviation
from the
validated
procedure
Quality of
raw material
or
intermediate
used
In-process
control
during
manufacturi
ng
9. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 9
Sample homogeneity:
•Sample homogeneity
Sampling error
Handling of
sample
Pooling of
sample
10. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 10
OOS investigations
As per MHRA(EU GMP) As per CDER(US FDA)
Phase - I Investigation
(Primary &extended lab
investigation)
Phase - II investigation
(Manufacturing investigation)
Phase - III Investigation
(Extended manufacturing, Re-
sampling and re-analysis)
Phase - I Investigation
(Primary & extended lab
investigation)
Phase - II investigation
(Manufacturing investigation and
re-sampling and re-analysis)
11. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 11
12. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 12
Case study 1
13. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 13
The law:
Under the Federal FDC Act
drug is adulterated
if the methods/facilities/controls used for, its manufacture,
processing, packing or holding
do not conform/not operated in accordance with cGMP to
assure that the drug meets the requirements to safety, identity,
strength, quality and purity characteristics.
(21 U.S.C. § 351(a)(2)(B) )
14. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 14
• FDA Inspection:
FDA investigators conducted a general inspection of Barr's
Northvale facility during August and September 1989 as well
as separate general inspections of Barr's Northvale and
Pomona facilities from May to September 1991.
After each inspection, the investigators issued Forms 483
(Inspectional Observations).
15. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 15
The 1989 Form 483, which contained five general
observations, cited Barr for
Invalidated manufacturing processes
Invalidated cleaning processes
The lack of failure investigations
Incomplete annual reviews
Failure to explain retesting
16. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 16
• The Offense:
Barr Laboratories was accused of having breached GMP
guidelines by routinely re-testing, re-sampling and re-
processing, had effectively persuaded all pharmaceutical
industry laboratories to standardize their protocols for dealing
with out-of-specification results (OSRs).
The court did not accept the FDA submission that an OSR
necessarily meant a batch failure.
17. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 17
• Key Points: Essence of Barr Labs Decision
Release of batch:
• Testing must show satisfactory conformance to
specifications, including Strength of each active ingredient.
• Context and history of product and batches inform the final
conclusion.
18. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 18
• Lesson -Have a plan for OOS:
Don’t test into compliance
Have a policy and follow it…
Avoid repeat testing
19. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 19
Outcomes
OOS investigations can be time consuming, but are necessary.
Robust OOS investigation SOP is critical.
Need for employee training and understanding.
Investigation plans must be pre-defined.
Multiple departments may be involved.
Scientific rationale needs to be used at each step.
QA needs all data in order to make the right decision.
Implement CAPAs.
Testing into compliance is not good.
20. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 20
References
USA vs. Barr Laboratories, Inc. Civil Action No. 92-1744, US
District Court for the district of New Jersey, February 4, 1993.
FDA, CDER, “Guidance for Industry, Investigating Out of
Specification (OOS) Test Results for Pharmaceutical Production,”
September 1998.
Torbeck, L., “Reportable Values for Out-of-Specification Test
Results,” Pharmaceutical Technology, February 1999.
21. RIPER
AUTONOMOUS
NAAC &
NBA (UG)
SIRO- DSIR
Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research - Autonomous
K.R.Palli Cross, Chiyyedu, Anantapuramu, A. P- 515721 21
THANKS YOU