Dr. Parag Moon 
Senior Resident 
Dept. of Neurology 
GMC, Kota.
 Stroke and ischemic heart disease are among 
the most common causes of death and 
disability in the world. 
 A cardioembolic stroke occurs when the heart 
pumps unwanted materials into the brain 
circulation, resulting in the occlusion of a 
brain blood vessel and damage to the brain 
tissue.
MECHANISMS OF STROKE 
5% 
20% 
LARGE ARTERY 
ATHEROSCLEROSIS 
25% 
20% 
30% 
CARDIOEMBOLISM 
CRYPTOGENIC 
LACUNES 
OTHERS 
Albers GW et al. Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke; Chest 2001.
Divided into three groups – 
 (1) Cardiac wall and chamber abnormalities - 
cardiomyopathies, hypokinetic and akinetic 
ventricular regions after myocardial 
infarction, atrial septal aneurysms, ventricular 
aneurysms, atrial myxomas, papillary 
fibroelastomas and other tumors, septal 
defects and patent foramen ovale;
 (2) Valve disorders -rheumatic mitral and 
aortic valve disease, prosthetic valves, 
bacterial endocarditis, fibrous and fibrinous 
endocardial lesions, mitral valve prolapse and 
mitral annulus calcification; and 
(3) Arrhythmias, -particularly atrial fibrillation 
and "sick-sinus" syndrome.
CARDIOEMBOLIC SOURCES 
Acute MI 
50% 
10% 
5% 
15% 
10% 10% 
Nonvalvular 
Atrial Fibrillation 
LV thrombus 
Valvular heart 
disease 
Prosthetic 
valves 
Other less 
common sources 
(PFO, ASA, 
aortic debris, etc.)
 Strong Sources (prosthetic valves, atrial 
fibrillation, sick-sinus syndrome, ventricular 
aneurysm, akinetic segments, mural thrombi, 
cardiomyopathy and diffuse ventricular 
hypokinesia) 
 Weak Sources(aortic and mitral stenosis, 
aortic and mitral regurgitation, congestive 
heart failure, mitral valve prolapse, mitral 
annulus calcification and hypokinetic 
ventricular segments).
 Most embolic events occur during typical 
activities of daily living 
 Some start during rest or sleep. 
 Sudden coughing, sneezing or rising at night to 
urinate are known to precipitate embolism 
 Deficit from a cardioembolic stroke is typically 
maximal at outset. 
 11% of these patients had a stuttering or 
stepwise course,10% had fluctuations or 
progressive deficits. 
 When progression occurs, it is usually due to 
distal passage of emboli.
 4.7-12% of cases, cardioembolic infarctions 
show a rapid regression of symptoms (the 
spectacular shrinking deficit syndrome) 
 When progression occurs, it is usually due to 
distal passage of emboli. 
 Hemorrhagic transformation occurs in up to 
71% of cardioembolic strokes. 
 Two types-petechial or multifocal, which is 
normally asymptomatic and secondary 
hematoma, which has mass effects and 
clinical deterioration
 Predictors of hemorrhagic transformation 
1. Decreased alertness 
2. Total circulation infarcts 
3. Severe strokes (NIHSS >14) 
4. Proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion, 
5. Hypodensity in more than one third of the 
middle cerebral artery territory 
6. Delayed recanalization (> 6 hours after 
stroke onset) with absence of collateral
Presence of embolism is suggested on CT or 
MRI 
1. Location and shape of the lesion 
2. Presence of superficial wedge-shaped 
infarcts in multiple different vascular 
territories 
3. Hemorrhagic infarction 
4. Visualization of thrombi within arteries 
 Typically, hemorrhage occurs into proximal 
reperfused regions of brain infarcts
 Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)- 
better visualization of the atria, cardiac 
valves, septal regions and aorta. 
 Diagnostic yield is 2-10 times that of TTE. 
 An echo-enhancing agent (such as agitated 
saline) can also help reveal an intracardiac 
shunt.
 Transcranial Doppler (TCD) 
 Embolic particles passing under TCD probes 
produce transient, short-duration, high-intensity 
signals referred to as HITS (high-intensity 
transient signals). 
 Monitoring of emboli with TCD may guide 
treatment decisions (e.g., performing TCD 
pre- and postinitiation of anticoagulation to 
assess whether HITS cease).
 Can be hypertensive, ischaemic, valvular or 
lone 
 16% of all ischemic strokes are associated 
with AF 
 AF increases the relative risk of ischemic 
stroke about five-fold
 Risk stratification-CHADS2 score
Echo parameters predicting stroke- 
 Moderate to severe left ventricular 
dysfunction 
 Decreased left atrial flow velocity 
(<15cm/sec) 
 Ventricular dilatation 
 Decreased left atrial ejection 
 Atrial enlargement 
 Spontaneous echo contrast
 Guidelines recommend anticoagulation in 
patients with more than 1 moderate risk 
factors (age 75 years or older, hypertension, 
heart failure, ejection fraction below 35% or 
fractional shortening less than 25% and 
diabetes mellitus) (evidence A). 
 Aspirin, 81–325 mg daily, is recommended as 
an alternative to vitamin K antagonists in 
low-risk patients or with contraindications to 
oral anticoagulation (evidence A).
Anticoagulants (unfractionated heparin or 
LMWH ) started in the first 48 hours vs other 
treatments in acute cardioembolic stroke 
 Didn’t show a significant reduction in 
recurrent stroke within 7 to 14 days with 
anticoagulation 
 Symptomatic intracranial bleeding were 
increased with early anticoagulation therapy
 Current guidelines-> 
1) Anticoagulation should be started as soon 
as possible in patients with AF after brain 
imaging for a TIA 
2) Should be delayed in ischemic stroke, 
according to ischemic lesion extension, 
clinical severity and cardiologic comorbidity, 
stroke in favour of anti-platelet therapy
 Non pharmacologic- 
 “Maze” procedure -complex lesioning of the 
left atrium and the pulmonary veins isolation 
 Surgical excision of the left atrium appendage
 Warfarin vs. placebo found a relative risk 
reduction of 2.5% to 4.7% per year for 
ischemic stroke and absolute stroke rate 
reduction of 33% to 86% 
 Warfarin is more efficacious than aspirin in 
stroke risk reduction. 
 Combination of warfarin plus antiplatelet 
versus warfarin alone didn’t show an additive 
beneficial effect; risk of bleeding was 
increased in patients receiving combination
 Absolute risk of hemorrhage in patients with 
AF on warfarin 2% per year, 0.3% to 0.6% were 
intracranial haemorrhage
 Predictors of LA clot and embolism 
1. Severity of mitral stenosis 
2. Presence of MR 
3. LA enlargement 
4. Atrial fibrillation 
5. Spontaneous echo contrast 
6. Pulmonary hypertension 
7. Rt ventricular systolic pressure
1. Anticoagulation- secondary prevention 
2. Surgical-open valvotomy 
3. Mitral valve replacement
 Factors predicting stroke in PFO 
1. Younger age 
2. Association with atrial septal aneurysm(ASA) 
3. Presence of a right-to-left shunt at rest, 
4. Size of the PFO 
5. Association with thrombophilic conditions
Diagnosis 
 Transcranial Doppler ultrasound with the 
microbubble technique, more accurate 
 Transesophageal echocardiography 
Treatment 
1. Antiplatelets drugs 
2. Anticoagulants, 
3. Closure of PFO by transcatheterization 
4. Closure of PFO by surgery.
 Thromboembolic-7 to 34% per year without 
anticoagulant therapy and 1 to 5% per year with 
oral anticoagulation 
 Risk factors tor thromboembolism 
1. Site of valve replacement, mitral >aortic valve 
2. Kind of mechanical valve used, 
bileaflet<monoleaflet and caged ball 
3. AF 
4. Left ventricular dysfunction 
5. Spontaneous echocardiographic contrast 
6. Increasing age
 Major embolism rate without antithrombotic 
therapy was 4.0% per year, 2.2% year with 
antiplatelets and 1.0% per year with 
anticoagulants 
 INR range of 2 to 3 for bileaflet mechanical 
aortic valves, 2.5 to 3.5 for mechanical mitral 
valves and for monoleaflet valves 
 Additional antiplatelet-stroke during 
anticoagulation or concomitant vascular risk 
factors
 Most stroke within two to four weeks of acute MI. 
 Anterior AMI, in whom the risk of ischemic stroke 
is 12% 
Predictors of stroke - 
1. AF 
2. ST segment elevation 
3. Left ventricular thrombus 
4. LV aneurysm 
5. Systolic dysfunction 
6. Older patients with large transmural Infarcts 
7. Congestive heart failure,
 Heparin followed by low-intensity oral 
anticoagulation (INR 1.6 to 2.5) reduced 
stroke by about 70% in the weeks following 
AMI 
 Long-term anticoagulation beyond three 
months is not justified unless other major 
cardiac embolic risk factors, such as mural 
thrombosis, are present.
 Sick sinus syndrome -secondary prevention 
in patients with well established SSS, 
anticoagulation should be considered 
 Mitral annulus calcification 
 Mitral valve prolapse
Thanks
 Prevention Strategies for Cardioembolic 
Stroke: Present and Future Perspectives; The 
Open Neurology Journal, 2010, 4, 56-63 
 Cardioembolic Stroke: Clinical Features, 
Specific Cardiac Disorders and Prognosis;Curr 
cardiology review ;april 2010; 6(1) ;pg 150- 
161 
 Cardioembolic stroke: An update on etiology, 
diagnosis and management :Annals of indian 
academy of neurology : 2008: Volume : 
11 Issue : 5 Page : 52-63

Cardioembolic stroke

  • 1.
    Dr. Parag Moon Senior Resident Dept. of Neurology GMC, Kota.
  • 2.
     Stroke andischemic heart disease are among the most common causes of death and disability in the world.  A cardioembolic stroke occurs when the heart pumps unwanted materials into the brain circulation, resulting in the occlusion of a brain blood vessel and damage to the brain tissue.
  • 3.
    MECHANISMS OF STROKE 5% 20% LARGE ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS 25% 20% 30% CARDIOEMBOLISM CRYPTOGENIC LACUNES OTHERS Albers GW et al. Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke; Chest 2001.
  • 4.
    Divided into threegroups –  (1) Cardiac wall and chamber abnormalities - cardiomyopathies, hypokinetic and akinetic ventricular regions after myocardial infarction, atrial septal aneurysms, ventricular aneurysms, atrial myxomas, papillary fibroelastomas and other tumors, septal defects and patent foramen ovale;
  • 5.
     (2) Valvedisorders -rheumatic mitral and aortic valve disease, prosthetic valves, bacterial endocarditis, fibrous and fibrinous endocardial lesions, mitral valve prolapse and mitral annulus calcification; and (3) Arrhythmias, -particularly atrial fibrillation and "sick-sinus" syndrome.
  • 6.
    CARDIOEMBOLIC SOURCES AcuteMI 50% 10% 5% 15% 10% 10% Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation LV thrombus Valvular heart disease Prosthetic valves Other less common sources (PFO, ASA, aortic debris, etc.)
  • 7.
     Strong Sources(prosthetic valves, atrial fibrillation, sick-sinus syndrome, ventricular aneurysm, akinetic segments, mural thrombi, cardiomyopathy and diffuse ventricular hypokinesia)  Weak Sources(aortic and mitral stenosis, aortic and mitral regurgitation, congestive heart failure, mitral valve prolapse, mitral annulus calcification and hypokinetic ventricular segments).
  • 8.
     Most embolicevents occur during typical activities of daily living  Some start during rest or sleep.  Sudden coughing, sneezing or rising at night to urinate are known to precipitate embolism  Deficit from a cardioembolic stroke is typically maximal at outset.  11% of these patients had a stuttering or stepwise course,10% had fluctuations or progressive deficits.  When progression occurs, it is usually due to distal passage of emboli.
  • 9.
     4.7-12% ofcases, cardioembolic infarctions show a rapid regression of symptoms (the spectacular shrinking deficit syndrome)  When progression occurs, it is usually due to distal passage of emboli.  Hemorrhagic transformation occurs in up to 71% of cardioembolic strokes.  Two types-petechial or multifocal, which is normally asymptomatic and secondary hematoma, which has mass effects and clinical deterioration
  • 10.
     Predictors ofhemorrhagic transformation 1. Decreased alertness 2. Total circulation infarcts 3. Severe strokes (NIHSS >14) 4. Proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion, 5. Hypodensity in more than one third of the middle cerebral artery territory 6. Delayed recanalization (> 6 hours after stroke onset) with absence of collateral
  • 11.
    Presence of embolismis suggested on CT or MRI 1. Location and shape of the lesion 2. Presence of superficial wedge-shaped infarcts in multiple different vascular territories 3. Hemorrhagic infarction 4. Visualization of thrombi within arteries  Typically, hemorrhage occurs into proximal reperfused regions of brain infarcts
  • 14.
     Transesophageal echocardiography(TEE)- better visualization of the atria, cardiac valves, septal regions and aorta.  Diagnostic yield is 2-10 times that of TTE.  An echo-enhancing agent (such as agitated saline) can also help reveal an intracardiac shunt.
  • 15.
     Transcranial Doppler(TCD)  Embolic particles passing under TCD probes produce transient, short-duration, high-intensity signals referred to as HITS (high-intensity transient signals).  Monitoring of emboli with TCD may guide treatment decisions (e.g., performing TCD pre- and postinitiation of anticoagulation to assess whether HITS cease).
  • 16.
     Can behypertensive, ischaemic, valvular or lone  16% of all ischemic strokes are associated with AF  AF increases the relative risk of ischemic stroke about five-fold
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Echo parameters predictingstroke-  Moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction  Decreased left atrial flow velocity (<15cm/sec)  Ventricular dilatation  Decreased left atrial ejection  Atrial enlargement  Spontaneous echo contrast
  • 19.
     Guidelines recommendanticoagulation in patients with more than 1 moderate risk factors (age 75 years or older, hypertension, heart failure, ejection fraction below 35% or fractional shortening less than 25% and diabetes mellitus) (evidence A).  Aspirin, 81–325 mg daily, is recommended as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists in low-risk patients or with contraindications to oral anticoagulation (evidence A).
  • 20.
    Anticoagulants (unfractionated heparinor LMWH ) started in the first 48 hours vs other treatments in acute cardioembolic stroke  Didn’t show a significant reduction in recurrent stroke within 7 to 14 days with anticoagulation  Symptomatic intracranial bleeding were increased with early anticoagulation therapy
  • 21.
     Current guidelines-> 1) Anticoagulation should be started as soon as possible in patients with AF after brain imaging for a TIA 2) Should be delayed in ischemic stroke, according to ischemic lesion extension, clinical severity and cardiologic comorbidity, stroke in favour of anti-platelet therapy
  • 22.
     Non pharmacologic-  “Maze” procedure -complex lesioning of the left atrium and the pulmonary veins isolation  Surgical excision of the left atrium appendage
  • 23.
     Warfarin vs.placebo found a relative risk reduction of 2.5% to 4.7% per year for ischemic stroke and absolute stroke rate reduction of 33% to 86%  Warfarin is more efficacious than aspirin in stroke risk reduction.  Combination of warfarin plus antiplatelet versus warfarin alone didn’t show an additive beneficial effect; risk of bleeding was increased in patients receiving combination
  • 24.
     Absolute riskof hemorrhage in patients with AF on warfarin 2% per year, 0.3% to 0.6% were intracranial haemorrhage
  • 25.
     Predictors ofLA clot and embolism 1. Severity of mitral stenosis 2. Presence of MR 3. LA enlargement 4. Atrial fibrillation 5. Spontaneous echo contrast 6. Pulmonary hypertension 7. Rt ventricular systolic pressure
  • 26.
    1. Anticoagulation- secondaryprevention 2. Surgical-open valvotomy 3. Mitral valve replacement
  • 27.
     Factors predictingstroke in PFO 1. Younger age 2. Association with atrial septal aneurysm(ASA) 3. Presence of a right-to-left shunt at rest, 4. Size of the PFO 5. Association with thrombophilic conditions
  • 28.
    Diagnosis  TranscranialDoppler ultrasound with the microbubble technique, more accurate  Transesophageal echocardiography Treatment 1. Antiplatelets drugs 2. Anticoagulants, 3. Closure of PFO by transcatheterization 4. Closure of PFO by surgery.
  • 29.
     Thromboembolic-7 to34% per year without anticoagulant therapy and 1 to 5% per year with oral anticoagulation  Risk factors tor thromboembolism 1. Site of valve replacement, mitral >aortic valve 2. Kind of mechanical valve used, bileaflet<monoleaflet and caged ball 3. AF 4. Left ventricular dysfunction 5. Spontaneous echocardiographic contrast 6. Increasing age
  • 30.
     Major embolismrate without antithrombotic therapy was 4.0% per year, 2.2% year with antiplatelets and 1.0% per year with anticoagulants  INR range of 2 to 3 for bileaflet mechanical aortic valves, 2.5 to 3.5 for mechanical mitral valves and for monoleaflet valves  Additional antiplatelet-stroke during anticoagulation or concomitant vascular risk factors
  • 31.
     Most strokewithin two to four weeks of acute MI.  Anterior AMI, in whom the risk of ischemic stroke is 12% Predictors of stroke - 1. AF 2. ST segment elevation 3. Left ventricular thrombus 4. LV aneurysm 5. Systolic dysfunction 6. Older patients with large transmural Infarcts 7. Congestive heart failure,
  • 32.
     Heparin followedby low-intensity oral anticoagulation (INR 1.6 to 2.5) reduced stroke by about 70% in the weeks following AMI  Long-term anticoagulation beyond three months is not justified unless other major cardiac embolic risk factors, such as mural thrombosis, are present.
  • 33.
     Sick sinussyndrome -secondary prevention in patients with well established SSS, anticoagulation should be considered  Mitral annulus calcification  Mitral valve prolapse
  • 34.
  • 35.
     Prevention Strategiesfor Cardioembolic Stroke: Present and Future Perspectives; The Open Neurology Journal, 2010, 4, 56-63  Cardioembolic Stroke: Clinical Features, Specific Cardiac Disorders and Prognosis;Curr cardiology review ;april 2010; 6(1) ;pg 150- 161  Cardioembolic stroke: An update on etiology, diagnosis and management :Annals of indian academy of neurology : 2008: Volume : 11 Issue : 5 Page : 52-63