CARBON CAPTURE & STORAGE
                   (CCS)
• Why Carbon Sequestration ?
• Inter Governmental Panel for Climate Change
  (IPCC) report 2005
• Role of Petroleum industry in the Process
• Is CCS promising
OVERALL CCS PROCESS
•   Source location
•   Capture process
•   Separation process
•   Compression
•   Transportation
•   Injection
•   Storage
CAPTURE PROCESS
•   Pre combustion capture
•   Post combustion capture
•   Flue gas separation
•   Oxy fuel combustion
Flue gases
                              SERATION
                                BODY            co2
                    air
                    POWER &
Post                   HEAT
combustion                                        CO2
        REFORMER               POWER &    co2 COMPRESSION
        + CO2 SEP                HEAT         DEHYDRATION
                                             TRANSPORTATION
Pre                            POWER &
combustion                       HEAT     co2

                                  AIR
 Oxy fuel
                              SEPRATION
                       air
                                 UNIT
POST COMBUSTION CAPTURE
• Designed to separate co2 from flue gas
  produced by fossil fuel combustion
• Present technology
  – Amino acid absorption
  – Monoethanolamine absorption
PRE COMBUSTION CAPTURE
• Fuel is combusted in presence of oxygen
• Used in coal gasification combined cycle
  power plants
• Highly conc CO2 obtained
• CO2 containing steam is at elevated pressure
STORAGE OPTIONS
• Geological storage
  – Depleted oil and gas reservoir
  – Enhanced oil recovery
  – Unmineable coal seams
  – Deep saline formations

  • Ocean storage
     As dissolved co2
     As co2 lake
•Depleted oil & gas reservoir
  •Most widely used currently
  •Disposing acid gas & other byproduct of
  oil &gas exploration
  •Reservoir should be isolated and have
  sufficient porosity
•Enhanced oil recovery
     mature technology
     co2 temporary stored
• Unmineable coal seams
  – CO2 can enhance coal bed methane recovery
  – Methane removal offset the cost of CO2
    storage operation

• Deep saline formations
   – These reservoirs are widely spread
   – CO2 density depends on depth of injection
   – Either trapped in cap rock above aquifer
   – Or CO2 may be dissolved by reacting
• Ocean storage
  – Largest potential sink for CO2
  – 40,000 gtc in ocean & 750 gtc in atm
  – If CO2 released below 3000m it will sink and
    form CO2 lake
  – If injected at 1500-3000 m it will dissolve in
    ocean water
  – Can be injected in form of bicarbonate ion at
    >200m
CCS IN INDIAN COAL SEAMS
               (A case study)
• India has huge coal reserve
• Unmineable coal seam as large potential for
  CBM
• CO2 replaces CBM
• 99% of Indian coal reserve belong to
  Gondwana basin
• 4 category of coal basin
• Coal has dual porosity (macro pore & micro
  pore )
• Coal has extra affinity for CO2 than methane
• Study was conducted on 3000ft * 2400ft *
  30ft block
• CO2 injected in block
• Cumulative gas injection for 20 yr depicted
•Rate of gas injection is
high during initial years
•Peak is obtained within
months of injection




                            Cumulative CO2 injection with time
Cumulative CBM production with time   Rate of water production with time



  •Injection of co2 provides extra drive mechanism
  for methane release
• Water production rate shows decline
• After few months reservoir is dry
• Now CBM can be released by gas injection
  only
• CO2 is best option
Review of some techniques
        economically not suited to CCS
•   Adsorption
•   Self assembled nanoporous materials
•   Membrane process
•   Cryogenic or refrigeration oriented
PROPOSED TECHNIQUES
1.Fast shaking truck
– Use of transition metals for adsorption
– Sonic chemistry for desorption

2. PH swing
   • PH maintained alkaline
3. Melting point swing
   • Salt hydrate used
CONCLUSION
•   Economic
•   Technical
•   Environmental
•   Social
REFRENCES
•   David Thomas & Sally Benson CO2 capture and storage project, 2005,
•   CCS from fossil fuel use, Massachuesetts institute of technology, Howard Herzog & Dan
    Golomb
•   American petroleum institute, compendium for green house gas emission
    Methodologies for oil & gas industry
•   V.Vishal, T.N Singh, IIT, Carbon capture and storage Indian coal seams, CMTC 151614,
    feb 2012
•   K.Ritter, S. Crookshank, API, Carbon capture and storage, CMTC151437, feb 2012
•   J.Gholinezad, Heriot-watt universuity, pre combustion captur of co2 from capture from
    synthesis gas mixture , SPE143580, may 2011
•   A.A.Espie, BP Exploration, co2 capture and storage: contributing to sustainable world
    growth, IPTC 10936, nov2005
•   J.P.Cifemo, national energy technology laboratory, US DOE , post combustion carbon
    capture R&D programme, CMTC 151635, feb 2012
•   S.Wong, W.D.Gunter, Alberta research council, Economics of co2 sequestration in CBM
    reservoirs, SPE 59785, april 2000
•   H.Ida, M.Ono, N.Takasu, National Institute of advanced industrial science/technology,
    CO2 capture technology using semi-clathrate hydrates. CMTC 151123, feb 2012
By
Manish Kumar
Ramanand
Dept of Petroleum engg.
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage
Carbon Capture & Storage

Carbon Capture & Storage

  • 1.
    CARBON CAPTURE &STORAGE (CCS) • Why Carbon Sequestration ? • Inter Governmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) report 2005 • Role of Petroleum industry in the Process • Is CCS promising
  • 2.
    OVERALL CCS PROCESS • Source location • Capture process • Separation process • Compression • Transportation • Injection • Storage
  • 3.
    CAPTURE PROCESS • Pre combustion capture • Post combustion capture • Flue gas separation • Oxy fuel combustion
  • 4.
    Flue gases SERATION BODY co2 air POWER & Post HEAT combustion CO2 REFORMER POWER & co2 COMPRESSION + CO2 SEP HEAT DEHYDRATION TRANSPORTATION Pre POWER & combustion HEAT co2 AIR Oxy fuel SEPRATION air UNIT
  • 5.
    POST COMBUSTION CAPTURE •Designed to separate co2 from flue gas produced by fossil fuel combustion • Present technology – Amino acid absorption – Monoethanolamine absorption
  • 6.
    PRE COMBUSTION CAPTURE •Fuel is combusted in presence of oxygen • Used in coal gasification combined cycle power plants • Highly conc CO2 obtained • CO2 containing steam is at elevated pressure
  • 7.
    STORAGE OPTIONS • Geologicalstorage – Depleted oil and gas reservoir – Enhanced oil recovery – Unmineable coal seams – Deep saline formations • Ocean storage As dissolved co2 As co2 lake
  • 8.
    •Depleted oil &gas reservoir •Most widely used currently •Disposing acid gas & other byproduct of oil &gas exploration •Reservoir should be isolated and have sufficient porosity •Enhanced oil recovery mature technology co2 temporary stored
  • 9.
    • Unmineable coalseams – CO2 can enhance coal bed methane recovery – Methane removal offset the cost of CO2 storage operation • Deep saline formations – These reservoirs are widely spread – CO2 density depends on depth of injection – Either trapped in cap rock above aquifer – Or CO2 may be dissolved by reacting
  • 10.
    • Ocean storage – Largest potential sink for CO2 – 40,000 gtc in ocean & 750 gtc in atm – If CO2 released below 3000m it will sink and form CO2 lake – If injected at 1500-3000 m it will dissolve in ocean water – Can be injected in form of bicarbonate ion at >200m
  • 12.
    CCS IN INDIANCOAL SEAMS (A case study) • India has huge coal reserve • Unmineable coal seam as large potential for CBM • CO2 replaces CBM • 99% of Indian coal reserve belong to Gondwana basin • 4 category of coal basin
  • 13.
    • Coal hasdual porosity (macro pore & micro pore ) • Coal has extra affinity for CO2 than methane • Study was conducted on 3000ft * 2400ft * 30ft block • CO2 injected in block • Cumulative gas injection for 20 yr depicted
  • 14.
    •Rate of gasinjection is high during initial years •Peak is obtained within months of injection Cumulative CO2 injection with time
  • 15.
    Cumulative CBM productionwith time Rate of water production with time •Injection of co2 provides extra drive mechanism for methane release
  • 16.
    • Water productionrate shows decline • After few months reservoir is dry • Now CBM can be released by gas injection only • CO2 is best option
  • 17.
    Review of sometechniques economically not suited to CCS • Adsorption • Self assembled nanoporous materials • Membrane process • Cryogenic or refrigeration oriented
  • 18.
    PROPOSED TECHNIQUES 1.Fast shakingtruck – Use of transition metals for adsorption – Sonic chemistry for desorption 2. PH swing • PH maintained alkaline
  • 19.
    3. Melting pointswing • Salt hydrate used
  • 20.
    CONCLUSION • Economic • Technical • Environmental • Social
  • 21.
    REFRENCES • David Thomas & Sally Benson CO2 capture and storage project, 2005, • CCS from fossil fuel use, Massachuesetts institute of technology, Howard Herzog & Dan Golomb • American petroleum institute, compendium for green house gas emission Methodologies for oil & gas industry • V.Vishal, T.N Singh, IIT, Carbon capture and storage Indian coal seams, CMTC 151614, feb 2012 • K.Ritter, S. Crookshank, API, Carbon capture and storage, CMTC151437, feb 2012 • J.Gholinezad, Heriot-watt universuity, pre combustion captur of co2 from capture from synthesis gas mixture , SPE143580, may 2011 • A.A.Espie, BP Exploration, co2 capture and storage: contributing to sustainable world growth, IPTC 10936, nov2005 • J.P.Cifemo, national energy technology laboratory, US DOE , post combustion carbon capture R&D programme, CMTC 151635, feb 2012 • S.Wong, W.D.Gunter, Alberta research council, Economics of co2 sequestration in CBM reservoirs, SPE 59785, april 2000 • H.Ida, M.Ono, N.Takasu, National Institute of advanced industrial science/technology, CO2 capture technology using semi-clathrate hydrates. CMTC 151123, feb 2012
  • 22.