The document discusses a retrospective evaluation of understanding the public policy landscape and lessons learned. It outlines an agenda that includes setting the stage for the evaluation, reviewing the process used, and highlighting key insights. The evaluation examines different strategies for influencing public policy outcomes through various audiences and decision makers.
The Stakeholder Engagement tool helps ensure that the appropriate stakeholders in decision processes have been identified and involved.
Tool: https://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/ms-11-46-e
Webinar Recording: http://universityofnc.adobeconnect.com/p99y8bhnosx/
The Stakeholder Engagement tool helps ensure that the appropriate stakeholders in decision processes have been identified and involved.
Tool: https://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/ms-11-46-e
Webinar Recording: http://universityofnc.adobeconnect.com/p99y8bhnosx/
The role of Monitoring and Evaluation in Improving Public Policies – Challeng...UNDP Policy Centre
IPC-IG's Research Coordinator, Fábio Veras Soares, presentation at the "International Conference on the
Institutionalization of Public Policies Evaluation", held in Rabat, on 5 October.
POLICY MAKING PROCESS
Policy
• a statement of intent for achieving an objective.
• Deliberate statement aimed at achieving specific objective
• policies are formulated by the Government in order to provide
a guideline in attaining certain objectives for the benefit of the
people.
• Importance and objective of any policy
• to solve existing challenges/problems in any society
• used as a tool to safeguard and ensure better services to
members of the society.
• Reasons for formulating a Policy
• Reforms (socio-economic, technological advancements, etc)
within and outside the country.
Policy monitoring and evaluation (M&E) has a critical role
to play in effectively design, implement and deliver public policies and services. Ensuring that policy making is informed by sound evidence on what works is essential to achieve key long-term objectives.
William N. Dunn Associate Dean and Professor University of Pittsburg
Dr. Dunn is a scholar, educator, and academic administrator. His most well-known publication is Public Policy Analysis, 4th ed.,which is one of the most widely cited books on the methodology of policy research and analysis in print.
Sharing scientific findings with policy makers remains a major challenge for many research project.This presentation by David Wafula of ISAAA AfriCenter gives you tips on how to effectively engage policy makers and make an impression about the findings of your reserarch. Making an impression is the first step towards policy influence!
The role of Monitoring and Evaluation in Improving Public Policies – Challeng...UNDP Policy Centre
IPC-IG's Research Coordinator, Fábio Veras Soares, presentation at the "International Conference on the
Institutionalization of Public Policies Evaluation", held in Rabat, on 5 October.
POLICY MAKING PROCESS
Policy
• a statement of intent for achieving an objective.
• Deliberate statement aimed at achieving specific objective
• policies are formulated by the Government in order to provide
a guideline in attaining certain objectives for the benefit of the
people.
• Importance and objective of any policy
• to solve existing challenges/problems in any society
• used as a tool to safeguard and ensure better services to
members of the society.
• Reasons for formulating a Policy
• Reforms (socio-economic, technological advancements, etc)
within and outside the country.
Policy monitoring and evaluation (M&E) has a critical role
to play in effectively design, implement and deliver public policies and services. Ensuring that policy making is informed by sound evidence on what works is essential to achieve key long-term objectives.
William N. Dunn Associate Dean and Professor University of Pittsburg
Dr. Dunn is a scholar, educator, and academic administrator. His most well-known publication is Public Policy Analysis, 4th ed.,which is one of the most widely cited books on the methodology of policy research and analysis in print.
Sharing scientific findings with policy makers remains a major challenge for many research project.This presentation by David Wafula of ISAAA AfriCenter gives you tips on how to effectively engage policy makers and make an impression about the findings of your reserarch. Making an impression is the first step towards policy influence!
A strategic approach to policy engagement for research organisationsJames Georgalakis
This is the presentation delivered as part of a two day workshop held in Nepal in 2014 aimed at communications professionals or the point person for communication within fifteen South Asian think tanks. Participants explored how they could adopt a systematic approach to planning research or knowledge outputs for policy engagement and influence. They explored the types of influencing outcomes they are focused on and their individual and institutional capacities to deliver strategic communication and policy engagement work. By the end of the workshop it was hoped that each participating institution would have identified a clear set of steps towards the development of a strategic approach to policy engagement and research communication at an institutional or programmatic level.
This workshop formed part of the IDRC funded Think Tanks Initiative South Asia programme. http://www.idrc.ca/EN/Programs/Social_and_Economic_Policy/Think_Tank_Initiative/Pages/About.aspx
Introduction to Systems Thinking: System Structures and BehaviourJason Yip
Presentation for the Sydney Limited WIP Society
An introduction to Systems Thinking for people who I assume are familiar with designing, building IT systems and/or the mess of large organisations
Targeting beginners OR a review of fundamentals for non-beginners
Presenting data-driven charts? Here are 5 secrets to delivering Presentation Charts and Graphs powerfully. Visit presentation-process.com for more such insights.
An immersive workshop at General Assembly, SF. I typically teach this workshop at General Assembly, San Francisco. To see a list of my upcoming classes, visit https://generalassemb.ly/instructors/seth-familian/4813
I also teach this workshop as a private lunch-and-learn or half-day immersive session for corporate clients. To learn more about pricing and availability, please contact me at http://familian1.com
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your NicheLeslie Samuel
Are bloggers thought leaders? Here are some tips on how you can become one. Provide great value, put awesome content out there on a regular basis, and help others.
A series of actions advancing a principle or tending toward a particular end.Stages of Building Advocacy Campaign are Planning, Implementation, Execution, Evaluation.
I wrote this Audit as a group assessment in one of my university courses, PR Strategy, During this process my group and I had to work closely with the organisation and provide them with information about how we believe they could improve. The name of the organisation has been replaced with Organisation X or X to respect the organisation's privacy.
Grant Funding for Nonprofit OrganizationsGrace Dunlap
In this 1 hour webinar hosted by CharityNet USA, we discuss the benefits and stipulations of grant funding for nonprofit organizations. For more information on grants, please visit: http://www.charitynetusa.com/grants.php
Seeking a Contractor with experience and expertise in communications planning, media relations, development and dissemination of information for publications, and evaluation of communications efforts? Missy Blankenship, Sales and Marketing
Ben Wright, Atlas Advertising's CEO, gives an overview of the latest trends in economic development marketing, including websites, GIS, Linkedin, and more. Presented at the IEDC Basic Economic Development Marketing and attraction course.
This document is elaborated as part of an assignment included in online course “Financing For Development” led by World Bank Group on Coursera Platform.
•Target audience: General Public in my country of origin. It is an informative document..
The main objectives of this artifact are the following:
• Inform general public about the highlights of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in a concise and clear way.
• Raise awareness and spread ideas, as many of the problems and issues explored during the course are known within specific community but may not be well understood by the general public.
• Make general public conscious of the challenges foreseen and explore some of the action lines opened to reach the Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs).
Who are you trying to reach and how? Building and using the modern public sec...Alexander Jasperse
Presented at MARCOM 2017 | www.marcom.ca
Do you know what impact your communications makes? How do you know if you are even communicating with or marketing to the right people?
As modern communicators, we instinctively know that our products and messaging needs to be designed with our audiences in mind and with measurable actions. Improving our ability to do so has certainly become easier with the widespread availability of online research and planning tools. With so many tools, which ones are most helpful to improving public sector efforts?
Designed in consultation with practitioners from federal, provincial, municipal, and international levels of government, this session will help you map and apply the essential tools for the modern public sector communicator. With a focus on low-cost and no-cost tools, the objective is to help practitioners identify opportunities to strengthen their current toolkits to increase the return on their efforts and campaigns.
Representation of insights developed to architect a cn email campaign for The New York State Department of Labor for the Excluded Workers Fund program.
Similar to Understanding the Public Policy Landscape: Lessons From a Retrospective Evaluation (20)
Refreshing Evaluation in Support of the Social Movements RevivalInnovation Network
There is a growing social consciousness in America and a revival of using social movements as a vehicle for social change—with increasing nonprofit involvement and philanthropic funding support. Since the mid-2000’s there have been several notable movements that have taken hold of the public consciousness: the immigration reform movement and DREAMers, The Occupy Movement, Gay Marriage, climate change movement, Black Lives Matter, and a nascent, potential movement developing in protest of the Trump Administration. While evaluating movements has some parallels to established evaluation practice, it also represents some thorny challenges. In a session presented at the American Evaluation Association Conference on November 10, 2017, we explore and share what we are learning about evaluating social movements, including: what we know about social movements, their components, characteristics, and types; what aspects of social movements are ripe for evaluation; and what existing evaluation approaches are well suited to evaluating social movements.
Innovation Network's Veena Pankaj and ORS Impact's Mel Howlett share dataviz products that can be used throughout the evaluation lifecycle, including theory of change, social network analysis, data placemat, strategic debrief deck, H-form, visual report deck, visual executive summary, and timeline.
During the 2015 American Evaluation Association's Annual Conference in Chicago, Katherine Haugh and Deborah Grodzicki conducted a real time data mini-study to see which evaluation approaches evaluators at #eval15 use most frequently in their work. Basing their mini-study off of Marvin C. Alkin's "Evaluation Roots: A Wider Perspective of Theorists’ Views and Influences," they asked evaluators to vote for the top two approaches they used most often. This handout accompanied the real time data mini-study to provide more information about the formation of the evaluation theory tree, it's three branches, and definitions of the evaluation approaches associated with each branch.
Putting Data in Context: Timelining for Evaluators (HANDOUT)Innovation Network
Creating a timeline is a method for picturing or seeing events as they take place over time. The full PowerPoint slides of this presentation are also available in SlideShare. Search for the title "Putting Data in Context: Timelining for Evaluators".
[Link: http://www.slideshare.net/InnoNet_Eval/putting-data-in-context-timelining-for-evaluators ]
Creating a timeline is a method for picturing or seeing events as they take place over time. By documenting major occurrences in chronological order, evaluators are able to identify patterns, themes, or trends that they may not have seen otherwise. A timeline allows evaluators to “zoom out” and look at the broader landscape, so that they are better positioned to think through and understand the context in which events occur. Having a timeline is especially useful for complex, multi-year evaluation projects with several threads of evaluation, where documenting the process is just as important as measuring the outcome itself. Creating a timeline has three key components: planning, populating, and revising. This presentation shows how to incorporate a timeline into a report, how to use a timeline to track progress internally, and how to utilize data visualization principles to create a visual timeline.
Highlights of this presentation are also available in our handout titled "Putting Data in Context: Timelining for Evaluators (HANDOUT)".
[Link: http://www.slideshare.net/InnoNet_Eval/putting-data-in-context-timelining-for-evaluators-handout ]
Data Placemats: Construction and Practical Design TipsInnovation Network
Increasing stakeholder involvement throughout the evaluation lifecycle, not only enhances stakeholder buy-in to the final evaluation results, but it also ensures that the evaluator is taking into consideration multiple viewpoints to be able to provide a more comprehensive picture of a program or initiative. Data placemats, a data viz technique to improve stakeholder understanding of data, can be used to communicate preliminary evaluation results during the analysis phase of the evaluation life cycle. When done correctly, it offers stakeholders an opportunity to form their own judgments about the data and weigh in prior to the final report. In this session, the presenter will review the concept of data placemats, focusing specifically on the nuts and bolts of constructing a data placemat.
Real Time Evaluation: Tips, Tools, and Tricks of the TradeInnovation Network
How can an evaluator meaningfully convey findings to stakeholders based on data collected that same day? How can real time evaluation really be done in real time? This Ignite talk is based on Innovation Network’s experiences with facilitating real time evaluation in health policy settings, and will introduce AEA participants to three tools that can be used as part of any evaluator’s real time evaluation toolbox: surveys, H-forms, and timelines. Yuqi Wang from Innovation Network will provide an overview of each tool; show how these tools can aid data collection, analysis, and communication of findings in real time; and lessons learned from Innovation Network’s experiences with these three tools during the evaluation process.
Collecting and analyzing data in real time doesn't have to be as stressful or hard as it sounds, especially if you want to collect real time data using surveys. There is a short way and a long way to collect real time survey data. The short way of collecting and analyzing survey data is to use software that has the capability of collecting and analyzing survey data when embedded into powerpoints or webinars. The long way is to use hard copies of surveys to collect data, and Excel to analyze. This document will show you step by step how to collect and analyze survey data the long way.
Make Your Data Count: Tips & Tools for Visual Reporting Innovation Network
In their session at YNPNdc's 2015 Annual Conference in Washington, DC, Johanna Morariu and Katherine Haugh presented on helpful tips and tools for visual reporting. This handout includes their suggestions, great examples of visual reports, and tools anyone can access to create powerful visual reports.
Make Your Data Count: New, Visual Approaches to Evaluation Reporting Innovation Network
Charts and graphs built on dataviz principles are transforming evaluation reporting and increasing the evaluator's communication power. At YNPNdc's 2015 Annual Conference in Washington DC, Johanna Morariu and Katherine Haugh will provide principles and case studies of new, visual approaches to evaluation reporting. The session will provide examples, such as incorporating a wealth of visuals in text reports, using large format hand-outs to emphasize findings, and designing slide reports.
Success and Failure in the Evaluation Process
What do the terms “success” and “failure” really mean in the philanthropic world? Funders have taken different approaches to learning from initiatives that haven’t gone quite as they had hoped. Some funders want to learn from their mistakes, some provide technical assistance to lagging grantees, and some want to focus their light on “bright spots” and grantee successes. In this session, Kat Athanasiades from Innovation Network will discuss how and when her organization uses grant reports in evaluation; how and why getting good evaluation data from grant reports is difficult; and potential ways to make it easier for grantees to report on failure in a way that could be useful to evaluators.
Session participants will:
•Know how funders can embed “failure reporting” into grant reports in ways that are useful to evaluators.
•Learn ways a foundation can combat some of the "structural" impediments, e.g., trust and communication, that may prevent proper reporting on failure.
•Gain ideas from fellow participants on how to understand and appreciate grantmaking "failures" as well as successes.
Since its inception in 2000, the Missouri Foundation for Health (MFH) has invested in policy change in Missouri. Recognizing a dearth of organizations with the capacity to advocate for Missouri health consumers, MFH broadened its grantmaking vision to building a field of consumer health advocates. Using the Framework for Evaluating Advocacy Field Building, Innovation Network and the Center for Evaluation Innovation are currently gauging how MFH shapes this field through its grantmaking. This presentation will focus on evaluating two dimensions of the Framework of this field: Adaptive Capacity and Skills & Resources. A discussion of data collection activities will give the audience ideas about how to evaluate these dimensions, lessons learned from the process, and what has been revealed through the evaluation about Skills & Resources and Adaptive Capacity in a field.
Handout for the session, "Data Placemats: A DataViz Technique to Improve Stakeholder Understanding of Evaluation Results" presented at the American Evaluation Association's 2014 conference.
#JAGUnity2014: Innovations in Evaluating Social MovementsInnovation Network
Today, social movement organizers are grappling with big questions: What is the long-term impact we are hoping to make? How can we measure the progress we've made thus far? How can we learn from past practice?
On June 7, 2014, Innovation Netowrk's William Fenn spoke on a panel with with Deepak Pateriya and Sian O'Faolain of the Center for Community Change and Hillary Klein of Make the Road New York to try and answer some of these questions. The presentation highlighted specific ways in which social movement organizers can evaluate the impact of their work.
Evaluation Essentials for Nonprofits: Terms, Tips, and TrendsInnovation Network
These slides are an excerpt from an evaluation session for the Young Nonprofit Professionals Network (YNPN), which was held in June 2014 in Washington, DC.
#JAGUnity2014: DataViz for Philanthropists! Tips, Tools, and How-Tos for Comm...Innovation Network
Presentation by Innovation Network's Johanna Morariu and Ann K. Emery at the Joint Affinity Groups Unity Conference, held June 6, 2014 in Washington, DC.
#JAGUnity2014: DataViz for Philanthropists! Tips, Tools, and How-Tos for Comm...Innovation Network
Presentation by Innovation Network's Johanna Morariu and Ann K. Emery at the Joint Affinity Groups Unity Conference, held June 6, 2014 in Washington, DC.
role of women and girls in various terror groupssadiakorobi2
Women have three distinct types of involvement: direct involvement in terrorist acts; enabling of others to commit such acts; and facilitating the disengagement of others from violent or extremist groups.
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
In a May 9, 2024 paper, Juri Opitz from the University of Zurich, along with Shira Wein and Nathan Schneider form Georgetown University, discussed the importance of linguistic expertise in natural language processing (NLP) in an era dominated by large language models (LLMs).
The authors explained that while machine translation (MT) previously relied heavily on linguists, the landscape has shifted. “Linguistics is no longer front and center in the way we build NLP systems,” they said. With the emergence of LLMs, which can generate fluent text without the need for specialized modules to handle grammar or semantic coherence, the need for linguistic expertise in NLP is being questioned.
हम आग्रह करते हैं कि जो भी सत्ता में आए, वह संविधान का पालन करे, उसकी रक्षा करे और उसे बनाए रखे।" प्रस्ताव में कुल तीन प्रमुख हस्तक्षेप और उनके तंत्र भी प्रस्तुत किए गए। पहला हस्तक्षेप स्वतंत्र मीडिया को प्रोत्साहित करके, वास्तविकता पर आधारित काउंटर नैरेटिव का निर्माण करके और सत्तारूढ़ सरकार द्वारा नियोजित मनोवैज्ञानिक हेरफेर की रणनीति का मुकाबला करके लोगों द्वारा निर्धारित कथा को बनाए रखना और उस पर कार्यकरना था।
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
13. ACTION
Framework for Public Policy Advocacy
Litigation
Community Mobilization
Model Legislation
Coalition Building
WILL
Champion Development
Media Advocacy
Public Will Campaigns
Political Will Campaigns
Communications and Messaging
Advocacy Capacity Building
AWARENESS
OUTCOMES
Community Organizing
Regulatory Feedback
Leadership Development
Voter Outreach
Public Forums
Demonstration Programs
Public Awareness Campaigns
Public Polling
Public Education
PUBLIC
Policy Analysis/Research
Influencer Education
INFLUENCERS
AUDIENCES
Policymaker Education
DECISION MAKERS
14. Grant Amount: __________________________
Grant Number(s): ________________________
Key outcomes areas addressed:
Strategies relevant to this grant(s):
ACTION
1: Knowledge and
Understanding for Action
Litigation
Community Mobilization
Model Legislation
Coalition Building
WILL
Community Organizing
Media Advocacy
Public Will Campaigns
Regulatory Feedback
2: Partnerships
Champion Development
Political Will Campaigns
3: Policy Innovation
Communications and Messaging
Advocacy Capacity Building
Leadership Development
Voter Outreach
AWARENESS
OUTCOMES
Content area: ___________________________
Grantee Name: __________________________
Grant Term(s): __________________________
Public Forums
Targets:
Demonstration Programs
Public Awareness Campaigns
Public Polling
Public Education
PUBLIC
Strategy framework c/o:
Policy Analysis/Research
Influencer Education
INFLUENCERS
AUDIENCES
Policymaker Education
DECISION MAKERS
14
INNOVATION NETWORK, INC.
15. Basic Grantee Information
Grantee Name:
Organization X
Grant Amount: $300,000
Grant Term(s):
January 1, 2009-December 31, 2009
If multiple grants, reason for grouping:
☐ Same grant activity (i.e. a renewed or
extended grant)
☐ Same topic/approach with related grant
activities
Topic Area:
☒Area A
☐ Area B
☐ Area C
☐ Area D
☐ Other
Assessment
This grant focuses on a tax coalition, which is comprised of 500 community asset-building
organizations and pro bono tax sites across the county. With the funding, Organization X intended to
launch a national advocacy campaign to inform policymakers, and do the following to advance its
agenda:
Build the affiliate base: Significantly increase the number of affiliates involved in the network from
around 50 to over 100
Deliverable (2009): In first narrative report, Organization X indicates that # of affiliates
reached 114
Create a comprehensive strategic communications plan. Focus on developing messages and eliciting
stories to effectively and compellingly disseminate its core messages
Deliverable (2009): Some client stories elicited in 2009, and planned to test a key message
at local sites.
Hire communications and political consultants
Delayed in 2009. No info on this in 2010.
Redesign the website
Deliverable (2010): Redesigned website launched in Feb 2010 with a more robust set of
advocacy tools for clients.
Submit quarterly policy briefs and/or publish issue papers and disseminate to elected officials and
their staffs and other policymakers
Deliverable (2009): Wrote in-depth policy paper. Distributed paper to field partners and
members of Congress on Day of Action Oct 2009. Also released a policy brief on VITA and
two position statements.
Deliverable (2010): Produced policy brief on refundable tax credits, distributed to partners
and Congressional offices. Produced targeted fact sheets with locally-focused information
to distribute to members of Congress. Organization X president testified during hearing for
☒Deliverables met
☐ Deliverables not met
☐ General operating
support (no specific
deliverables)
16. Basic Grantee Information
Grantee Name:
Organization X
Grant Amount: $300,000
Grant Term(s):
January 1, 2009-December 31, 2009
If multiple grants, reason for grouping:
☐ Same grant activity (i.e. a renewed or
extended grant)
☐ Same topic/approach with related grant
activities
Topic Area:
☒Area A
☐ Area B
☐ Area C
☐ Area D
☐ Other
Assessment
This grant focuses on a tax coalition, which is comprised of 500 community asset-building
organizations and pro bono tax sites across the county. With the funding, Organization X intended to
launch a national advocacy campaign to inform policymakers, and do the following to advance its
agenda:
Build the affiliate base: Significantly increase the number of affiliates involved in the network from
around 50 to over 100
Deliverable (2009): In first narrative report, Organization X indicates that # of affiliates
reached 114
Create a comprehensive strategic communications plan. Focus on developing messages and eliciting
stories to effectively and compellingly disseminate its core messages
Deliverable (2009): Some client stories elicited in 2009, and planned to test a key message
at local sites.
Hire communications and political consultants
Delayed in 2009. No info on this in 2010.
Redesign the website
Deliverable (2010): Redesigned website launched in Feb 2010 with a more robust set of
advocacy tools for clients.
Submit quarterly policy briefs and/or publish issue papers and disseminate to elected officials and
their staffs and other policymakers
Deliverable (2009): Wrote in-depth policy paper. Distributed paper to field partners and
members of Congress on Day of Action Oct 2009. Also released a policy brief on VITA and
two position statements.
Deliverable (2010): Produced policy brief on refundable tax credits, distributed to partners
and Congressional offices. Produced targeted fact sheets with locally-focused information
to distribute to members of Congress. Organization X president testified during hearing for
Media Advocacy
Public/Influencer Education
Public Education
Policymaker Education
☒Deliverables met
☐ Deliverables not met
☐ General operating
support (no specific
deliverables)
17. Grant Amount: __________________________
$300,000
OrgX20090112
Grant Number(s): ________________________
Key outcomes areas addressed:
Strategies relevant to this grant(s):
ACTION
1: Knowledge and
Understanding for Action
Litigation
Community Mobilization
Model Legislation
Coalition Building
WILL
Community Organizing
Media Advocacy
Public Will Campaigns
Regulatory Feedback
2: Partnerships
Champion Development
Political Will Campaigns
3: Policy Innovation
Communications and Messaging
Advocacy Capacity Building
Leadership Development
Voter Outreach
AWARENESS
OUTCOMES
Content area: ___________________________
Area A
Organization X
Grantee Name: __________________________
Grant Term(s): __________________________
1/1/09-12/31/09
Public Forums
Targets:
Demonstration Programs
Public Awareness Campaigns
Public Polling
Public Education
PUBLIC
Strategy framework c/o:
Policy Analysis/Research
Influencer Education
INFLUENCERS
AUDIENCES
Policymaker Education
DECISION MAKERS
17
INNOVATION NETWORK, INC.
18. Grant Amount: __________________________
$300,000
OrgX20090112
Grant Number(s): ________________________
Key outcomes areas addressed:
Strategies relevant to this grant(s):
ACTION
1: Knowledge and
Understanding for Action
Litigation
Community Mobilization
Model Legislation
Coalition Building
WILL
Community Organizing
Media Advocacy
Public Will Campaigns
Regulatory Feedback
2: Partnerships
Champion Development
Political Will Campaigns
3: Policy Innovation
Communications and Messaging
Advocacy Capacity Building
Leadership Development
Voter Outreach
AWARENESS
OUTCOMES
Content area: ___________________________
Area A
Organization X
Grantee Name: __________________________
Grant Term(s): __________________________
1/1/09-12/31/09
Public Forums
Targets:
Demonstration Programs
Policymakers
Public Awareness Campaigns
Public Polling
Public Education
PUBLIC
Strategy framework c/o:
Policy Analysis/Research
Influencer Education
INFLUENCERS
AUDIENCES
Advocates
Policymaker Education
DECISION MAKERS
INNOVATION NETWORK, INC.
19. ACTION
Organization X
WILL
Media Advocacy
Communications and
Messaging
Public Forums
AWARENESS
Outcomes
Model Legislation
Policy Analysis/Research
Public Education
PUBLIC
Influencer Education
INFLUENCERS
Audiences
Policymaker Education
DECISION MAKERS
20. All Grants
WILL
AWARENESS
Outcomes
ACTION
(n = 110)
Community Mobilization
18
Community Organizing
10
Public Will Campaigns
3
Coalition Building
21
Media Advocacy
36
Communications and
Model Legislation
29
Regulatory Feedback
14
Champion Development
15
Political Will Campaigns
1
Messaging
Advocacy Capacity
36
Public Forums
Building
27
9
Leadership Development
Voter Outreach
6
Demonstration Programs
1
18
Public Awareness
Campaigns
21
Public Polling
Policy Analysis/Research
22
90
Public Education
Influencer Education
Policymaker Education
63
81
71
PUBLIC
INFLUENCERS
Audiences
DECISION MAKERS
21. Potential Case Study Grantees
WILL
AWARENESS
Outcomes
ACTION
(n = 38)
Community Mobilization
11
Community Organizing
9
Public Will Campaigns
3
Coalition Building
12
Media Advocacy
17
Communications and
Model Legislation
11
Regulatory Feedback
8
Champion Development
9
Political Will Campaigns
1
Messaging
Advocacy Capacity
11
Public Forums
Building
10
5
Leadership Development
Voter Outreach
4
Demonstration Programs
1
7
Public Awareness
Campaigns
11
Public Polling
Policy Analysis/Research
6
30
Public Education
Influencer Education
Policymaker Education
26
31
25
PUBLIC
INFLUENCERS
Audiences
DECISION MAKERS
22. Repeat grantees
ACTION
(n = 75)
Community Mobilization
14
WILL
AWARENESS
Outcomes
Coalition Building
16
Model Legislation
19
Regulatory Feedback
8
Community Organizing
Champion Development
9
10
Media Advocacy
Public Will Campaigns
Political Will Campaigns
22
3
1
Communications and
Messaging
Advocacy Capacity
22
Public Forums
Building
15
6
Leadership Development
Voter Outreach
4
Demonstration Programs
1
10
Public Awareness
Campaigns
17
Public Polling
Policy Analysis/Research
16
61
Public Education
Influencer Education
Policymaker Education
43
54
45
PUBLIC
INFLUENCERS
Audiences
DECISION MAKERS
23. Grantees receiving >$300,000
ACTION
(n = 69)
Community Mobilization
17
WILL
AWARENESS
Outcomes
Coalition Building
16
Model Legislation
22
Regulatory Feedback
17
Community Organizing
Champion Development
7
13
Media Advocacy
Public Will Campaigns
Political Will Campaigns
31
1
2
Communications and
Messaging
Advocacy Capacity
27
Public Forums
Building
25
4
Leadership Development
Voter Outreach
5
Demonstration Programs
1
17
Public Awareness
Campaigns
13
Public Polling
Policy Analysis/Research
10
55
Public Education
Influencer Education
Policymaker Education
44
54
51
PUBLIC
INFLUENCERS
Audiences
DECISION MAKERS
24. Grantees receiving $300,000
ACTION
(n = 59)
Community Mobilization
5
WILL
AWARENESS
Outcomes
Coalition Building
9
Model Legislation
13
Regulatory Feedback
3
Community Organizing
Champion Development
4
8
Media Advocacy
Public Will Campaigns
15
2
Communications and
Messaging
Advocacy Capacity
16
Public Forums
Building
9
7
Leadership Development
2
Demonstration Programs
6
Public Awareness
Campaigns
12
Public Polling
Policy Analysis/Research
16
51
Public Education
Influencer Education
Policymaker Education
30
42
35
PUBLIC
INFLUENCERS
Audiences
DECISION MAKERS
26. ACTION
Framework for Public Policy Advocacy
Litigation
Community Mobilization
Model Legislation
Coalition Building
WILL
Champion Development
Media Advocacy
Public Will Campaigns
Political Will Campaigns
Communications and Messaging
Advocacy Capacity Building
AWARENESS
OUTCOMES
Community Organizing
Regulatory Feedback
Leadership Development
Voter Outreach
Public Forums
Demonstration Programs
Public Awareness Campaigns
Public Polling
Public Education
PUBLIC
Policy Analysis/Research
Influencer Education
INFLUENCERS
AUDIENCES
Policymaker Education
DECISION MAKERS
43. Media
Campaign
Did your organization
specifically target the media in
your outreach?
Which types of media outlets
were you targeting?
To what extent did your efforts
enhance visibility of your issue?