Abnormal
Psychology
PSYC 3140 3.0D(F)
What are we studying?
   Abnormal
    Behaviour
   Psychopathology
   Mental Disorder
   Mental Illness
   Deviant Behaviour
The study of mental disorder
involves:
 Definition: What do we mean by
  mental disorder?
 Classification: How do we distinguish
  between different mental disorders?
 Explanation: How do we understand
  mental disorder?
 Treatment: How do we treat mental
  disorder?
Why study abnormal
psychology?
 Abnormal behaviour is part of our
  common experience
 Lots of unanswered questions and
  complexities
 Preparation for future careers
     www.apa.org/students/
Mental Health Professionals
   Clinical
    Psychologist
    (Ph.D., C. Psych.)
   Psychiatrist (M.D.)
   Psychiatric Social
    Worker (M.S.W.)
   Psychoanalyst
   Therapist
Obtaining Personal Help

   Room 145 Behaviour Science
    Building 416.736.5297
What do we mean by mental
disorder?
   Who has a mental disorder?
     Mass  murders?
     People who want to cut off their arms
      and legs?
     People who can’t pay attention and
      concentrate?
Is the concept of ‘Mental
Disorder’ problematic?
   “I should like to make clear, therefore, that
    although I consider the concept of mental
    illness to be unserviceable, I believe that
    psychiatry could be a science. I also believe
    that psychotherapy is an effective method of
    helping people – not to recover from an
    ‘illness’ but rather to learn about
    themselves, others and life.” Szasz
Why clarify the definition of
mental disorder?
 Influences what is seen as
  pathological
 Influences explanation, classification
  and treatment
 Clarifies the role of professionals
Why clarify the definition of
mental disorder?
 Safe-guard against abuses
 Clarify contentious cases
Two broad ways to define
mental disorder
   In general, the concept of “mental
    disorder” can be defined as:
    A  biomedical, culturally independent,
      value-free concept
     Or as a social, culturally relative,
      value-based concept.
Overview of definitions that
will be discussed
 Mental disorder as a statistical
  deviation
 Mental disorder as dysfunction

 Mental disorder as personal
  discomfort
 Mental disorder as maladaptive
  behaviour
 Mental disorder as norm or value
  violation
Mental disorder as statistical
deviance
   A person has a mental disorder when
    their behaviour, ability, or experience
    is significantly different from average.
Mental disorder as statistical
deviance
Mental disorder as statistical
deviance
 Problems:
 We want to use the term disorder to
  describe some conditions that are
  statistically frequent
 “positive” deviations are not
  distinguished from “negative”
  deviations
 we do not want to call all “negative
  deviations a disorder
   Uggo Betti:
     “Allof us are mad. If it weren’t for the
      fact that every one of us is slightly
      abnormal, there wouldn’t be any point
      of giving each person a separate
      name.”
Mental disorder as a
dysfunction
 A person has a mental disorder when
  a mental mechanism is not performing
  the natural function it was designed to
  perform.
 Problems:
     Natural
           selection does not “design”
     mechanisms
   Sedgwick (1982):
     “Allsickness is essentially deviancy
      from some alternative state of affairs
      which is considered more desirable…
      The attribution of illness always
      proceeds from the computation of a
      gap between presented behaviour (or
      feeling) and some social norm.”
Mental disorder as a
dysfunction
   Problems cont:
     For many mechanisms there is a wide
      range of adaptive functioning across
      people and situations (fear response).
Mental disorder as a
dysfunction
   Problems cont:
     Many  things that we want to call a
      disorder might actually be adaptive
      reactions.
Mental disorder as personal
discomfort
 A person has a mental disorder if they
  experience personal distress.
 Problems:
     What about the person who abuses
     drugs or believes they are receiving
     messages from outer-space – without
     experiencing distress?
Mental disorder as
maladaptive behaviour
 A person has a mental disorder if they
  engage in behaviour that prevents
  them from meeting the demands of
  life.
 Problems:
     There may be situations that people
      should not adapt to
     This approach emphasizes “fitting in”
      as being ultimately important
Mental disorder as norm or
value violation
 A person has a mental disorder if they
  have experiences and exhibit
  behaviours that are inconsistent with
  the norms and values of society.
 Examples:
     Behaviour   that is harmful to oneself or
      others
     Poor reality contact
     Inappropriate emotional reactions
     Erratic behaviour
Mental disorder as norm or
value violation
   Problems:
     What  if violation is result of external
      circumstances
     Such a criteria can seem too arbitrary
      and open to abuse
DSM-IV definition of mental
disorder
   A mental disorder is “conceptualized
    as a clinically significant behavioural
    or psychological syndrome or pattern
    that occurs in an individual and that is
    associated with present distress or
    disability or with a significantly
    increased risk of suffering death, pain,
    disability, or an important loss of
    freedom.”
DSM-IV definition of mental
disorder
 “The syndrome or pattern must not be
  merely an expectable and culturally
  sanctioned response to a particular
  event, for example, the death of a
  loved one.”
 “It must currently be considered a
  manifestation of a behavioural,
  psychological, or biological
  dysfunction in the individual.”
Cross cultural issues

   How one thinks about the role of
    culture depends on your definition of
    mental disorder
Cross cultural issues

   If biomedical, then culture influences
    how a disorder impacts members of
    different cultures
     Differentrisk
     Idiom of distress
Cross cultural issues

   If culturally based, then influences
    what will be considered a disorder
     Behaviour   or experience may not be a
      “disorder” in all cultures
Non-Western approaches to
mental disorder
   Often do not separate psychology and
    spirituality
     Disruption   in relation to spirit world
   Often based on more collective and
    less individualistic conceptualizations
     Disruption   in interpersonal relations
The study of mental disorder
involves:
 Definition: What do we mean by
  mental disorder?
 Categorization: How do we classify
  mental disorder?
 Explanation: How do we understand
  mental disorder?
 Treatment: How do we treat mental
  disorder?
Further exploration:
   Linienfeld, S. O., & Marino, L. (1995). Mental
    Disorder as a Roschian Concept: A critique of
    Wakefield’s “Harmful Dysfunction” analysis.
    Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104(3), 411-
    420.
   Szasz, T. (2000). Second commentary on
    “Aristotle’s function argument. Philosophical
    Psychiatry and Psychology 7(1), 3-16.
   Wakefield, J. (1992). The concept of mental
    disorder: On the boundary between biological
    facts and social values. American
    Psychologist, 47(3), 373-388.

Abnormal psychology 1b

  • 1.
  • 2.
    What are westudying?  Abnormal Behaviour  Psychopathology  Mental Disorder  Mental Illness  Deviant Behaviour
  • 3.
    The study ofmental disorder involves:  Definition: What do we mean by mental disorder?  Classification: How do we distinguish between different mental disorders?  Explanation: How do we understand mental disorder?  Treatment: How do we treat mental disorder?
  • 4.
    Why study abnormal psychology? Abnormal behaviour is part of our common experience  Lots of unanswered questions and complexities  Preparation for future careers  www.apa.org/students/
  • 5.
    Mental Health Professionals  Clinical Psychologist (Ph.D., C. Psych.)  Psychiatrist (M.D.)  Psychiatric Social Worker (M.S.W.)  Psychoanalyst  Therapist
  • 6.
    Obtaining Personal Help  Room 145 Behaviour Science Building 416.736.5297
  • 7.
    What do wemean by mental disorder?  Who has a mental disorder?  Mass murders?  People who want to cut off their arms and legs?  People who can’t pay attention and concentrate?
  • 8.
    Is the conceptof ‘Mental Disorder’ problematic?  “I should like to make clear, therefore, that although I consider the concept of mental illness to be unserviceable, I believe that psychiatry could be a science. I also believe that psychotherapy is an effective method of helping people – not to recover from an ‘illness’ but rather to learn about themselves, others and life.” Szasz
  • 9.
    Why clarify thedefinition of mental disorder?  Influences what is seen as pathological  Influences explanation, classification and treatment  Clarifies the role of professionals
  • 10.
    Why clarify thedefinition of mental disorder?  Safe-guard against abuses  Clarify contentious cases
  • 11.
    Two broad waysto define mental disorder  In general, the concept of “mental disorder” can be defined as: A biomedical, culturally independent, value-free concept  Or as a social, culturally relative, value-based concept.
  • 12.
    Overview of definitionsthat will be discussed  Mental disorder as a statistical deviation  Mental disorder as dysfunction  Mental disorder as personal discomfort  Mental disorder as maladaptive behaviour  Mental disorder as norm or value violation
  • 13.
    Mental disorder asstatistical deviance  A person has a mental disorder when their behaviour, ability, or experience is significantly different from average.
  • 14.
    Mental disorder asstatistical deviance
  • 15.
    Mental disorder asstatistical deviance  Problems:  We want to use the term disorder to describe some conditions that are statistically frequent  “positive” deviations are not distinguished from “negative” deviations  we do not want to call all “negative deviations a disorder
  • 16.
    Uggo Betti:  “Allof us are mad. If it weren’t for the fact that every one of us is slightly abnormal, there wouldn’t be any point of giving each person a separate name.”
  • 17.
    Mental disorder asa dysfunction  A person has a mental disorder when a mental mechanism is not performing the natural function it was designed to perform.  Problems:  Natural selection does not “design” mechanisms
  • 18.
    Sedgwick (1982):  “Allsickness is essentially deviancy from some alternative state of affairs which is considered more desirable… The attribution of illness always proceeds from the computation of a gap between presented behaviour (or feeling) and some social norm.”
  • 19.
    Mental disorder asa dysfunction  Problems cont:  For many mechanisms there is a wide range of adaptive functioning across people and situations (fear response).
  • 20.
    Mental disorder asa dysfunction  Problems cont:  Many things that we want to call a disorder might actually be adaptive reactions.
  • 21.
    Mental disorder aspersonal discomfort  A person has a mental disorder if they experience personal distress.  Problems:  What about the person who abuses drugs or believes they are receiving messages from outer-space – without experiencing distress?
  • 22.
    Mental disorder as maladaptivebehaviour  A person has a mental disorder if they engage in behaviour that prevents them from meeting the demands of life.  Problems:  There may be situations that people should not adapt to  This approach emphasizes “fitting in” as being ultimately important
  • 23.
    Mental disorder asnorm or value violation  A person has a mental disorder if they have experiences and exhibit behaviours that are inconsistent with the norms and values of society.  Examples:  Behaviour that is harmful to oneself or others  Poor reality contact  Inappropriate emotional reactions  Erratic behaviour
  • 24.
    Mental disorder asnorm or value violation  Problems:  What if violation is result of external circumstances  Such a criteria can seem too arbitrary and open to abuse
  • 26.
    DSM-IV definition ofmental disorder  A mental disorder is “conceptualized as a clinically significant behavioural or psychological syndrome or pattern that occurs in an individual and that is associated with present distress or disability or with a significantly increased risk of suffering death, pain, disability, or an important loss of freedom.”
  • 27.
    DSM-IV definition ofmental disorder  “The syndrome or pattern must not be merely an expectable and culturally sanctioned response to a particular event, for example, the death of a loved one.”  “It must currently be considered a manifestation of a behavioural, psychological, or biological dysfunction in the individual.”
  • 28.
    Cross cultural issues  How one thinks about the role of culture depends on your definition of mental disorder
  • 29.
    Cross cultural issues  If biomedical, then culture influences how a disorder impacts members of different cultures  Differentrisk  Idiom of distress
  • 30.
    Cross cultural issues  If culturally based, then influences what will be considered a disorder  Behaviour or experience may not be a “disorder” in all cultures
  • 31.
    Non-Western approaches to mentaldisorder  Often do not separate psychology and spirituality  Disruption in relation to spirit world  Often based on more collective and less individualistic conceptualizations  Disruption in interpersonal relations
  • 32.
    The study ofmental disorder involves:  Definition: What do we mean by mental disorder?  Categorization: How do we classify mental disorder?  Explanation: How do we understand mental disorder?  Treatment: How do we treat mental disorder?
  • 33.
    Further exploration:  Linienfeld, S. O., & Marino, L. (1995). Mental Disorder as a Roschian Concept: A critique of Wakefield’s “Harmful Dysfunction” analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104(3), 411- 420.  Szasz, T. (2000). Second commentary on “Aristotle’s function argument. Philosophical Psychiatry and Psychology 7(1), 3-16.  Wakefield, J. (1992). The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist, 47(3), 373-388.