Download to read offline
![Student Engagement vs Experience
Experience IS the co-created, contextual conditions within which students
experience the learning environment including the teacher, physical or
virtual surroundings, course and content design as well as the established
institutional (and classroom) cognitive and emotional cultures.
Engagement IS a the outcome of the learner’s perceived value of the
experience interplaying with their own degree of self-efficacy [growth of
confidence].](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/futureofworkingteachinglearning-170811212830/75/A-Snapshot-of-the-Future-Working-Teaching-Learning-23-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byDr. Melissa A. Bordogna
A Snapshot of the Future— Working, Teaching & Learning
The document discusses five megatrends impacting the future of work and education, including globalization, technology, and changing behavior. It highlights the skills necessary for future job markets, emphasizing the importance of adaptability, emotional intelligence, and interdisciplinary approaches. The future of higher education is presented as requiring a shift towards multi-disciplinary curricula, new funding models, and a focus on enhancing the student experience through engagement.
More Related Content
Similar to A Snapshot of the Future— Working, Teaching & Learning
A Snapshot of the Future— Working, Teaching & Learning
- 1. A Snapshot ofthe Future— Working, Teaching & Learning February 20, 2017 Dr. Melissa A. Bordogna
- 3. 5 Megatrends 1) Globalisation 2)Millennials & Extreme Longevity 3) Mobility 4) Changing Behaviours 5) Technology
- 4. Technology 1) Cloud Computing 2)Big Data 3) Internet of Things (IoT) 4) Social Technologies 5) Robotics 6) Automation 7) Artificial Intelligence 40% Australian jobs that exist today are at risk to automation.
- 5. Profession AI Web DesignerThe Grid Online Marketer Persado Office Manager Betty Accountant Smacc HR Professional FlatPi Journalist Wordsmith Editor Bold Lawyer Ross Doctor Bablyon Psychologist/Therapist Ellie Source: Venture Beat, 2016
- 6. WHAT ARE THESKILLS & CAPABILITIES NEEDED FOR THIS FUTURE??? @DrMelisBordogna #futureofwork #futureoflearning
- 7. Future of WorkCapabilities
- 8.
- 9. • Resilience • LeadingPersonal-Professional Learning • Emotional Intelligence
- 10. • Social Intelligence •Cross Cultural Competency • Social (Virtual) Collaboration
- 11. • Novel &Adaptive Thinking • Cognitive Load Management • Sense Making
- 12. • New MediaLiteracy • Design Mindset • Transdisciplinary Approaches • Computational Thinking
- 13. DISCUSSION POINT: Preparing Studentsfor FOW What needs to happen now, so that we can prepare students with these new skills? @DrMelisBordogna #futureofwork #futureoflearning
- 14.
- 17. The Future ofTeaching & Learning
- 18. RAPID RESPONSE: Given thepotential impacts of these trends, what do you believe the future holds for Higher Ed?
- 19. “The university hasno future. In 15 years, we will have no students to teach. Students want a good, professional job and degrees are evaluated against employability. But the professional jobs for which we currently prepare students will be done by intelligent machines. So why would students take on the debts involved in undertaking a degree course as it is conceived today?” —Eric Cook, University of Southampton
- 20. “Via the nexusof teaching and research, universities are uniquely positioned to define the skills and attributes of Australia’s future workforce.” —Deloitte Access Economics 2015
- 22. Higher Education inthe Future • ACADEMIC CURRICULA WILL BECOME MORE MULTI-DISCIPLINARY— GREATER Cross-Disciplinary Learning & Thinking • A Balance Traditional and Online Learning • HIGHER EDUCATION WILL NEED TO EXPLORE NEW FUNDING MODELS • Student Recruitment & Retention Even More Vital • HIGHER EDUCATION NEEDS TO INVEST IN TECHNOLOGY
- 23. Student Engagement vsExperience Experience IS the co-created, contextual conditions within which students experience the learning environment including the teacher, physical or virtual surroundings, course and content design as well as the established institutional (and classroom) cognitive and emotional cultures. Engagement IS a the outcome of the learner’s perceived value of the experience interplaying with their own degree of self-efficacy [growth of confidence].
- 24. Experience Design—Predictors ofEngagement • Autonomy— • Feelings of choice and control • Mastery— • level of academic challenge • Reward & Recognition Source: (Pink 2009; May et al 2004; Korobova & Starobin 2015) • Social Interaction— • student-faculty interaction • active and collaborative learning • supportive learning environment • Purpose— • enriching educational experiences (relevance)
- 26.
- 27. @DrMelisBordogna Dr. Melissa ABordogna LET’S CONNECT! www.katalysisx.com www.gednet.com.au melissa@gednet.com.au
- 28. Abuhamdeh, S., &Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2012). Attentional involvement and intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 36(3), 257-267. Austin, J. E. (2000). Principles for Partnership. Journal of Leader to Leader. 18 (Fall), pp. 44-50. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. Spence & J. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2). New York : Academic Press. Australian Higher Education Industry Association (2016) The Australian Higher Education Workforce of the Future. PwC, Accessed on Feb 10, 2017. Available at: http://www.aheia.edu.au/news/higher-education-workforce-of-the-future-167 Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall. Berg, O. (2011) The Driving Force behind Social Collaboration CMS Wire. Retrieved 22 Feb. 2016 http://www.cmswire.com/cms/enterprise-20/the-driving- force-behind-social-collaboration-010751.php Bostock, S.J (1998). "Constructivism in Higher Education." British Journal of Educational Technology. Vol 29 No 3 pp225-240 Bradley, A.J., McDonald, M.P. (2011) The Social Organization: How to Use Social Media to Tap the Collective Genius of Your Customers and Employees. Gartner, Inc. Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Buch, R., Säfvenbom, R., & Boe, O. (2015). The relationships between academic self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and perceived competence. Journal of Military Studies, 6(1) Brookfield, S.D., (2004) Critical Thinking Techniques. IN: Galbraith, Michael W., Adult Learning Methods: A Guide for Effective Instruction (3rd ed), Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company B&T Magazine (2014) Why Australia’s Collaborative Economy Is Worth $46 billion. Retrieved 20 Nov. 2015 http://www.bandt.com.au/media/deloitte-google-value-australias-collaborative-economy-46-billion Reading List
- 29. Burgess, C., Burgess,M. (2014) The Social Employee: How Great Companies Make Social Media Work. McGraw-Hill Education. Burr, V. (1995). Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge, pp. 2-5. Carbonneau, N., Vallerand, R., & Lafrenière, M. (2012). Toward a Tripartite Model of Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Personality, 80( Chui, M., Manyika, J., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., Sarrazin, H., Sands, G and Westergren, M. (2012) The Social Economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies. McKinsey Global Institute, Retrieved 20 Nov. 2015 http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/high-tech/our-insights/the-social-economy Csikszentmialyi, M., (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishing. Dalziel, J. & Peat, M. (1998). Fostering collaborative learning during student transition to tertiary education: An evaluation of academic and social benefits, In Rust, C. (Ed.), Improving Student Learning: Improving Students as Learners. Proceedings for the Fifth International Student Learning Symposium (pp. 272-283). The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Glasgow: UK. Deloitte Access Economics & Google (2014) The Collaborative Economy—Unlocking the Power of the Workplace Crowd. Retrieved 20 Nov. 2015 http://www2.deloitte.com/au/en/pages/economics/articles/collaborative-economy-unlocking-power-of-workplace-crowd.html Deloitte Access Economics (2015) The importance of universities to Australia’s prosperity. Accessed on Feb 10, 2017. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/au/en/pages/economics/articles/importance-universities-australias-prosperity.html DePasque, S., & Tricomi, E. (2015). Effects of intrinsic motivation on feedback processing during learning. Neuroimage, 119, 175-1 Doolittle, P E (1999). "Constructivism: The Career and Technical Education Perspective." Journal of Vocational and Technical Education. Vol. 16, No 1. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. (pp. 1-19). Oxford; UK, Elsevier Publishing. DISHMAN, L. (2012) Why Your Company Needs A Chief Collaboration Officer. Fast Company Retrieved 20 Nov. 2015 http://www.fastcompany.com/1836468/why-your-company-needs-chief-collaboration-officer DUVAUCHELLE , D. (2014) Why enterprises (big and small) are slow to adopt social collaboration tools. The Next Web. Retrieved 22 Feb. 2016 http://thenextweb.com/entrepreneur/2014/01/30/enterprises-big-small-slow-adopt-social-collaboration-tools/ FROILAND, J., & WORRELL, F. (2016). INTRINSIC MOTIVATION, LEARNING GOALS, ENGAGEMENT, AND ACHIEVEMENT IN A DIVERSE HIGH SCHOOL. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 53(3), 321-336.
- 30. Fidelman, M. (2013)Socialized!: How the Most Successful Businesses Harness the Power of Social (Social Century). Bibliomotion, Inc. Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press. Gabbert, B., Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R. (1986). Cooperative learning, group to individual transfer, process gain, and the acquisition of cognitive reasoning strategies. J Psychol, 120(3); pp. 265-278. Gahan, P., Adamovic, M., Bevitt, A., Harley, B., Healy, J., Olsen, J.E., Theilacker, M. 2016. Leadership at Work: Do Australian leaders have what it takes? Melbourne: Centre for Workplace Leadership, University of Melbourne. Available at: workplaceleadership.com.au/sal Galbraith, M.W. (2004). Adult Learning Methods: A Guide for Effective Instruction (3rd ed). Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company Garrison, J. (1998). Toward a pragmatic social constructivism. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison (Eds.), Constructivism and education (pp. 43-60). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge. Gerlach, J. M. (1994). Is this collaboration? In Bosworth, K. & Hamilton, S. J. (Eds.), Collaborative Learning: Underlying Processes and Effective Techniques, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 59. (pp.5-14). San Francisco; USA, Jossey-Bass Publishing. Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266-275. Gergen, M. & Gergen, K.J.(2003). Social Construction: A Reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 2-5. Gokhale, A.A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology education. 7(1), Retrieved 5 Nov. 2011, from: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v7n1/gokhale.jte-v7n1.html. Golub, J. & NCTE Committee (1988). Focus on Collaborative Learning: Classroom Practices in Teaching English. Urbana, IL; USA, National Council of Teachers of English Publishing. Gray, D. (2012) The Connected Company. O’Reilly Media, Inc. Sebastopol, CA. Greene, B., & Miller, R. (1996). Influences on Achievement: Goals, Perceived Ability, and Cognitive Engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 181-192.
- 31. Hajkowicz, S., Reeson,A., Rudd, L., Bratanova, A., Hodgers, L., Mason, C., & Boughen, N. (2016) Tomorrow’s Digitally Enabled Workforce. CSIRO, Accessed on Nov 8, 2016. Available at: https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/download?pid=csiro:EP161054&dsid=DS1 Holmes,B Tangney, B FitzGibbon, A Savage,T and Meehan, S (2001). Communal Constructivism: Students constructing learning for as well as with others. Proceedings of SITE 2001, Florida Hergenhahn, B. R., & Olson, M. H. (1993). An introduction to theories of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Herrington, J and Oliver R (2000). An Instructional Design Framework for Authentic Learning Environments. In, Educational Technology, Research and Development, Vol. 48, No. 3. pp23-47 Hinchcliffe, D. (2016) Enterprises confront the reality of ‘multilayered’ collaboration Enterprise Irregulars Retrieved 22 Feb. 2016 https://www.enterpriseirregulars.com/104461/enterprises-confront-reality-multilayered-collaboration/ Howe, K. & Berv, J. (2000). Constructing Constructivism, Epistemological and Pedagogical. In D.C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in Education: Ninety-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1. Chicago, Illinois: National Society for the Study of Education. Institute For The Future (2016) Future Skills: Update and Literature Review. Accessed on Nov 8, 2016. Available at: http://www.iftf.org/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/wfi/ACTF_IFTF_FutureSkills-report.pdf Jenni, R.W. & Mauriel, J. (2004). Cooperation and collaboration: Reality or rhetoric? International Journal of Leadership in Education. 7(2 ), pp. 181–95. Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1981). Effects of cooperative and individualistic learning experiences on interethnic interaction. J Educ Psych 73(3); pp. 454-459. Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R. T. (1990) Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research, Edina, MN; Interaction Book Company Johnson, R.T. & Johnson, D.W. (1986). Action Research: Cooperative Learning in the Science Classroom. Journal of Science and Children, 24(2), pp. 31–32. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. & Smith, K.A. (1991). Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom (p. 1-6). Edina, Minnesota; USA. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., Stanne, M.B. & Garibaldi, A. (1990). Impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative groups. Journal of Soc-Psycho, 130 (4), pp.507-516. Johnson, D.W., Skon, L. & Johnson, R.T. (1980). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic conditions on children's problem solving performance. Amer Ed Res J,17(1); pp. 83-94.
- 32. Kenneth, B.A. (1996).Collaborative Learning and the Conversation of Mankind. In Wiley, M., Gleason, B. & Phelps, L.W. (Eds.), Composition in Four Keys (pp.84-97). California; USA, Mayfield Company Publishing. Klemm, W.R. (1994). Using a Formal Collaborative Learning Paradigm for Veterinary Medical Education. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 21(1), pp.:2-6. Korobova, N. & Soko, S.S. (2015) A Comparative Study of Student Engagement, Satisfaction, and Academic Success among International and American Students. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 72-85. Kurshan, B (2015) The Revolution Will Be Semantic: Web3.0 And The Emergence of Collaborative Intelligence. Fast Company Retrieved 20 Nov. 2015 http://www.forbes.com/sites/barbarakurshan/2015/09/25/the-revolution-will-be-semantic-web3-0-and-the-emergence-of-collaborative-intelligence/#2f4f828c3800 Kuo, M., & Chuang, T. (2016). How gamification motivates visits and engagement for online academic dissemination – An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 16-27. Leask, M., Ramos, J. and Younie, S. (2001). Communal Constructivism and ICT Pedagogy, Proceedings of ITTE 2001, Swansea (in press) Leary, D. E. (1990). Psyche's muse: The role of metaphor in the history of psychology. In D.E. Leary (Ed.), Metaphors in the history of psychology (pp. 1-78). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Leonard, P. E., & Leonard, L.J. (2001). The collaborative prescription: Remedy or reverie? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(4); pp. 383–99. Linnenbrink, E.A., & Pintrich, P.R. (2010) The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs In Student Engagement and Learning in the Classroom. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 119-137. MacGregor, J.T. (1990). Collaborative learning: Shared inquiry as a process of reform. In Svinicki, M.D. (Ed.), The changing face of college teaching, New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 42. San Francisco; USA, Jossey-Bass Publishing. Mayer, R. E. (1992). Cognition and instruction: Their historic meeting within educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 405-412. McConnell, D. (2006) E-learning groups and communities, SRHE/OU Press Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. C. (1941). Social learning and imitation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- 33. Morace, C., GaviserLeslie, S. (2014) Transform: How Leading Companies are Winning with Disruptive Social Technology. McGraw- Hill Education. Niederpruem, M. (2014) Applying Social Construction Theory to Collaborative Phenomena in the Nonprofit Sector. Academia. Retrieved 22 Apr. 2016 https://www.academia.edu/10897035/Applying_Social_Construction_Theory_to_Collaborative_Phenomena_in_the_Nonprofit_Se ctor Oliver, R and Herrington, J (2000). Using Situated Learning as a Design Strategy for Web-based Learning. London, Idea Group Publishing Ormrod, J. E. (1999). Human learning (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578. Panitz, T.(1996). A Definition of Collaborative vs Cooperative Learning. Deliberations, London Metropolitan University; UK., Retrieved 5 Nov. 2015, from: http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/deliberations/collaborative-learning/panitz-paper.cfm. Panitz, T.(1999). Collaborative versus Cooperative Learning: A Comparison of the Two Concepts Which Will Help Us Understand the Underlying Nature of Interactive Learning. Cape Cod Community College, peninsula, Massachusetts; USA. Retrieved 5 Nov. 2015, from: http://home.capecod.net/~tpanitz/tedsarticles/coopdefinition.htm. Paulson, D. R. & Faust, J.L. (2002 May 18). Active Learning For The College Classroom. California State University, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Retrieved 5 Nov. 2015, from: http://www.calstatela.edu/dept/chem/chem2/Active/index.htm. Pearce, K.A. (2002). Making Better Social Worlds: Engaging in and Facilitating Dialogic Communication. Redwood City, CA: Pearce Associates.
- 34. Pugach, M.C. &Johnson, L. J. (1995). Collaborative practitioners collaborative school, (p.178). Denver, Colorado; USA. Love Company Publishing. Pintrich, P.R., & de Groot, E.V. (1990) Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. Rogders, M., Runyon, D., Starrett, D., Von Hozlen, R., (2006 ). The 21st century learner. Proceeding of 22nd annual conference on distance teaching and learning, The Board of Regents of the University of Winconsin System; USA, Retrieved 5 Nov. 2015 from: http://depd.wisc.edu/series/06_4168.pdf. Rosen, E. (2013) The Bounty Effect: 7 Steps to The Culture of Collaboration. Red Ape Publishing. Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: Prentice Hall. von Glaserfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick, The Invented Reality, (pp. 17-40). New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Salmon, G. (2005) E-moderating, Open University Press Schunk, D. (1986). Vicarious Influences on Self-Efficacy for Cognitive Skill Learning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 316-327. Sharma, B.R. (2013) Student Engagement and Its Predictors: An Exploratory Study in an Indian Business School. Global Business Review, 14(1), 25-42. Srinivas, H. (2011 Oct. 21, last updated).What is Collaborative Learning? The Global Development Research Center, Kobe; Japan. Retrieved 5 Nov 2015, from: http://www.gdrc.org/kmgmt/c-learn/index.html. Smith, B. L. & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is collaborative learning? In Goodsell , A., Maher, M., Tinto, V., Smith, B. L. & MacGregor J. T. (Eds.), Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. Pennsylvania State University; USA, National center on postsecondary teaching, learning, and assessment publishing. Stockham, M (2014) The Rise of the Chief Collaboration Officer? Inside Blackberry Business Blog Retrieved 22 Feb. 2016 http://bizblog.blackberry.com/2014/05/the-rise-of-the-chief-collaboration-officer/ Siu, O., Bakker, A., & Jiang, X. (2014). Psychological Capital Among University Students: Relationships with Study Engagement and Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(4), 979-994.
- 35. Tamm, J.W., Luyet,R.J. (2004) Radical Collaboration: Five Essential Skills to Overcome Defensiveness and Build Successful Relationships HarperCollins Publishers. The World Economic Forum: The Future of Jobs & Skills (2016) Accessed on Nov 8, 2016. Available at: http://reports.weforum.org/future-of-jobs-2016/ Totten, S. (1991). Cooperative Learning: A Guide to Research. Sills, T., Digby, A. & Ross, P. (Eds.), New York; USA, Garland Publishing. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published in 1934). Walker, C., Greene, B., & Mansell, R. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1-12. Watson, J. B. (1925). Behaviorism. New York: W.W. Norton Welch, M. (1998). Collaboration: Staying on the bandwagon. Journal of Teacher Education; 49(1), pp. 26–38. Wiggins, G. P. (1998). Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass. Wlodkowski, R. J., (2004) Creating Motivating Learning Environments, In Galbraith, Michael W., Adult Learning Methods: A Guide for Effective Instruction (3rd ed.), Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.
Editor's Notes
- #4 Working in a world where boundaries do not exist…language, currency and physical location are mattering less and less 50% of workforce by 2020 is predicted to be millennials 75% by 2025…digital natives, different expectations about work Being connected anytime, anywhere on any device Living a more pubic life, building communities and increased sharing and collaboration; greater emphasis on health and wellness Big data, internet of things, greater automation and artificial intelligence
- #5 Technological Displacement = Greater Rate = Happening Faster Data is growing alongside the exponential growth of computing power Global growth of internet connected devices Internet of things is all about personalisation…. Social Technologies “Between $900 billion and $1.3 trillion in value can be unlocked through the use of social technologies.” In its Collaborative Economy report, Deloitte Access Economics estimated that the value of faster-growing, profitable businesses with collaboration at their core to be worth $46 billion per year in Australia alone And the value if companies make the most of collaborative opportunities to be worth $9.3 billion per year – Australia alone For example, thousands of robots are already entering Korean schools to assist with language instruction -McKinsey Report
- #6 IBM’s Watson cognitive computer to do paralegal work; Watson already handles simple cases by itself. Artificial intelligence is also able to make medical diagnoses, and there are robot surgeons. Financial systems run on algorithms. IBM’s Watson is being trained to answer call centre queries in natural language. It would also make an ideal tutor for Moocs: always available and always up to date. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, meanwhile, has established an “Affective Computing Group” within its Media Lab. Heather Knight, a PhD student at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, attended a drama course and is now training her robots to express emotion and to “understand” humour. The first two production runs of a Japanese companion robot, called Pepper, sold out in less than a minute. Robots are learning to simulate kindness and caring better than most humans. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/what-will-universities-look-like-in-2030-future-perfect# http://venturebeat.com/2016/07/23/10-jobs-that-a-i-and-chatbots-will-replace-sooner-or-later/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=pulsenews https://thegrid.io/ https://automatedinsights.com/products/ [Wordsmith] https://bold.io/ http://www.rossintelligence.com/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/12098412/Robot-doctor-app-raises-25m-to-predict-future-of-your-health.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter http://futurism.com/uscs-new-ai-ellie-has-more-success-than-actual-therapists/
- #7 smart machines will soon largely displace humans from tasks that are repetitive and mechanistic—tasks in which humans imitate machines and tasks that aim for scale and consistency of production
- #9 Future Workskills 2020 (2011, updated 2016) + Synthesis of other reports Deloitte & Google 2014 Collaborative Economy… 2016 Leadership Report….Future of L&D 2016 report….
- #11 Social intelligence will be a critical skill both for managing relationships and adapting to new kinds of workplace organizations, including both off-line and online contexts…New forms of digital labor, like micro-work and crowdsourcing, demand that people quickly establish rapport with distributed teams, frequently composed of colleagues they will never actually meet in person. In face-to-face interactions, social intelligence is an increasingly important skill, informed by our growing understandings of human behavior, including the profit-margin implications of how well staff are treated. Conversely, lack of social intelligence is becoming less tolerable, especially in key supervisory positions. Cross Cultural or intercultural competence is the ability to understand and then effectively perform, communicate, and engage with others in a different cultural context.[16] Exposure is not enough…. researchers maintain that cross-cultural competency must be learned through practice and training…. And in my experience teaching cross-cultural management I’ve seen…. Social (virtual) collaboration…. exists across space and time through both synchronous and asynchronous communication formats HUGE impacts on and integration with other skill sets…. Sense-making, the ability to create unique insights that are critical to decision-making, will also be impacted by virtual collaboration. Not only can intercultural components complicate sense-making, but the nature of virtual communication sometimes requires more sense-making skills than traditional modes of communication. Social intelligence takes on a whole new meaning in the virtual world, where communications can easily be shorn of politeness and misconstrued. Certainly, new media literacy plays a bit of a role in virtual collaboration, at least in terms of properly using the technological tools.
- #12 Novel & Adaptive Thinking…As everyone and everything becomes more connected, the result is not just that we can do things faster, cheaper, or better. Rather, it is that the whole system becomes highly unpredictable—a change in one area will resonate throughout the whole. As the labor market continues to be defined by volatility, unpredictability, and complexity, workers will be even more frequently called upon to respond to novel and unexpected situations. Type of Adaptive Thinking…. ….. “interactive team cognition.”[45] Interactive team cognition, also referred to as collective cognition, posits that teams are dynamic systems where cognition emerges through interactions among team members as they coordinate and execute a task.[46] Cognition in a team situation is not the sum of the knowledge or capabilities across the individual team members but rather the result of the interactions between them and how they perform in the task environment.[47] Cognitive Load Management…Cognitive load theory (CLT) was first introduced by Miller (1956) to analyze and address the limitations of an individual’s working memory when faced with processing vast amounts of information. Over the years, many researchers have expanded upon Miller’s original formulation in order to examine the effects of attentional control[55] and multitasking[56] on cognitive load processes in the workplace. Today’s world requires processing an unprecedented amount of data in our everyday lives. The ability to skillfully manage one’s cognitive capacity becomes especially important as information from people, objects, and other sources continue to increase daily. Managing this tremendous amount of data so that it creates assets, rather than obstacles, will require workers to develop relevant practices and tools. Deal with the “culture of interruption” also learning how to manage data will also help to streamline how information is packaged and disseminated. Recent studies suggest that workers may also benefit from practicing mindfulness techniques throughout the day…. Sense-making, the ability to create unique insights that are critical to decision-making….the ability to generalize principles that can be applied to novel situations. Looking again at the example of financial analysis, digital pattern recognition can successfully tease out countless useful correlations from historical data, but it cannot effectively project the results of a significant qualitative legal change. To intuitively understand a human system well enough to project the impact of changes in underlying motivations or approach is the exclusive domain of human sense-making.
- #13 New Media Literacy-- critical evaluation… Workers will need to become fluent in assessing new media forms in order to understand how to receive information and subsequently interpret the world. Goes beyond identity management and is about the new media ecology…. New media literacy, comprised of the underlying skills of ascertaining credibility and identifying implicit messages in texts and visual representations plus “knowledge of use” for new kinds of media.[86] Design Mindset…Design thinking is an approach to problem solving that can be applied to both real-world situations as well as intangible services. New capabilities are on the horizon for designing our world on scales ranging from micro to macro—from our minds and bodies to our cities and ecosystems. Importantly, design thinking is non-linear. 1) problem finding; 2) observation; 3) visualization and sense making; 4) ideation; 5) prototyping and testing; and 6) viability testing (Glen et al., 2015).[93 Transdisciplinary thinking goes beyond interdisciplinary teamwork by integrating fields and perspectives rather than working jointly across disciplines. As writer and theorist Howard Rheingold explains, this skill is really about “speak[ing] the languages of multiple disciplines biologists who have understanding of mathematics, mathematicians who understand biology.” Future workers will need to be equipped to think through different disciplinary approaches themselves. Computational thinking, or the ability for individuals to see and manipulate connections across digital systems, It is defined broadly as “the thought processes involved in formulating problems and their solutions so that the solutions are represented in a form that can be effectively carried out by an information processing agent.”[112] Computational thinking is not just relevant to computer science and adjacent fields—it also encompasses a range of cognitive and analytical abilities that can be used across all disciplines, making it one of the more fundamental skills for future workers.[113] Computational thinking not only brings together principles from across the STEM fields, it is also uniquely transdisciplinary in its incorporation of ideas from communications, psychology, and education.
- #14 smart machines will soon largely displace humans from tasks that are repetitive and mechanistic—tasks in which humans imitate machines and tasks that aim for scale and consistency of production
- #16 Social Exchange Theory
- #17 Social Exchange Theory
- #18 Australia’s universities are already perceiving and adapting to these emerging forces. They are innovating in the ways they deliver teaching and learning, disrupting the traditional lecture hall and transforming university campuses into centres of social, intellectual and entrepreneurial activity.
- #20 https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/what-will-universities-look-like-in-2030-future-perfect#
- #21 The importance of universities to Australia’s prosperity …but only IF they evolve and adapt….
- #22 file:///C:/Users/Melissa/Downloads/Carol%20Dickenson%20and%20David%20Sacks.pdf
- #23 https://www.fastcoexist.com/3029109/futurist-forum/5-bold-predictions-for-the-future-of-higher-education Augmented and VR Google Glass to Oculus maximize the educational experience
- #24 Social Exchange Theory
- #25 1. Autonomy – the desire to direct our own lives. 2. Mastery — the urge to get better and better at something that matters. 3. Purpose — the yearning to do what we do in the service of something larger than ourselves. Instructors can enhance student engagement by encouraging students to become more active participants in their education through setting and achieving goals and by providing collaborative opportunities for educational research, planning, teaching, evaluation, and decision-making. Providing teachers with training on how to promote student autonomy was beneficial in enhancing student engagement by providing students with a more autonomous environment, rather than a controlling environment. Learning communities… Korobova & Starobin 2015)