The presentation defines sustainability experiments and describes a categorisation based on 6 different uses of these experiments. The 6 categories are utilized for analysing Finland's current quest to become an experimentalist society,
Strategic experiments as an alternative to traditional policy developmentAnnukka Berg
This document discusses strategic experiments as an alternative approach to traditional policy development in Finland. It defines strategic experiments as initiatives that are new, concrete, limited in scope, but have the potential for wider impact. Examples mentioned include local low-carbon projects and governance experiments. Three hypotheses are presented for why experimenting could be a useful approach: it allows for personal learning through action; it demonstrates leadership through example; and it can spark new practices and alternatives through collaboration. However, challenges include whether experiments can achieve structural change and whether governments have the skills and resources for this approach. The document proposes further research on these issues and the possibilities and limits of experimenting as a governance strategy.
The document discusses Finland's goal of becoming a leader in experimental culture by promoting policy experimentation. It outlines four goals of the government's experimental initiative: 1) innovative solutions and services, 2) individual initiative and entrepreneurship, 3) regional decision-making and cooperation, and 4) improved foresight and social problem solving. The government plans to conduct many small trials and experiments and make the legal process for experimentation easier. The overall aim is to accelerate grassroots experiments to develop better solutions and divide complicated issues into manageable experiments.
Experimental Finland - the story so farAnnukka Berg
A presentation delivered in the Finnish Innovation Seminar in Abu Dhabi in May 2017. The slides encapsulate the main points of the Experimental Finland Project.
The document discusses Finland's efforts to promote an experimental government culture. It outlines four goals of the government's program: innovative solutions, individual initiative, strengthening regional decision-making, and improving foresight. It advocates a top-down and bottom-up approach to grassroots experiments to develop better solutions. The objectives are to make Finland a leader in experimental culture and discover new solutions through experiments. It also discusses establishing an experimental culture through strategic actions, local experiments, and utilizing successful results.
On 23 October 2017, the OECD-EC report on Supporting Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Higher Education in Ireland was launched in Dublin in presence of Mary Mitchell O’Connor, Irish Minister of State for Higher Education, Mari Kiviniemi, OECD's Deputy Secretary-General and Antoaneta Angelova-Krasteva, Director for Innovation, International Cooperation and Sport Directorate-General for Education an Culture of the European Commission.
Find out more: http://www.oecd.org/publications/supporting-entrepreneurship-and-innovation-in-higher-education-in-ireland-9789264270893-en.htm
Bloch - Measuring Innovation in the public sectorinnovationoecd
This document discusses measuring innovation in the public sector. It outlines several surveys conducted since 2008 to measure innovation among public sector organizations, moving away from comparing the public and private sectors to focus on policy-relevant issues for the public sector. The document also discusses policy interests in public sector innovation and future topics for survey research, such as identifying transformative innovations, measuring beneficial outcomes, and linking innovation capabilities to governance models.
Strategic experiments as an alternative to traditional policy developmentAnnukka Berg
This document discusses strategic experiments as an alternative approach to traditional policy development in Finland. It defines strategic experiments as initiatives that are new, concrete, limited in scope, but have the potential for wider impact. Examples mentioned include local low-carbon projects and governance experiments. Three hypotheses are presented for why experimenting could be a useful approach: it allows for personal learning through action; it demonstrates leadership through example; and it can spark new practices and alternatives through collaboration. However, challenges include whether experiments can achieve structural change and whether governments have the skills and resources for this approach. The document proposes further research on these issues and the possibilities and limits of experimenting as a governance strategy.
The document discusses Finland's goal of becoming a leader in experimental culture by promoting policy experimentation. It outlines four goals of the government's experimental initiative: 1) innovative solutions and services, 2) individual initiative and entrepreneurship, 3) regional decision-making and cooperation, and 4) improved foresight and social problem solving. The government plans to conduct many small trials and experiments and make the legal process for experimentation easier. The overall aim is to accelerate grassroots experiments to develop better solutions and divide complicated issues into manageable experiments.
Experimental Finland - the story so farAnnukka Berg
A presentation delivered in the Finnish Innovation Seminar in Abu Dhabi in May 2017. The slides encapsulate the main points of the Experimental Finland Project.
The document discusses Finland's efforts to promote an experimental government culture. It outlines four goals of the government's program: innovative solutions, individual initiative, strengthening regional decision-making, and improving foresight. It advocates a top-down and bottom-up approach to grassroots experiments to develop better solutions. The objectives are to make Finland a leader in experimental culture and discover new solutions through experiments. It also discusses establishing an experimental culture through strategic actions, local experiments, and utilizing successful results.
On 23 October 2017, the OECD-EC report on Supporting Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Higher Education in Ireland was launched in Dublin in presence of Mary Mitchell O’Connor, Irish Minister of State for Higher Education, Mari Kiviniemi, OECD's Deputy Secretary-General and Antoaneta Angelova-Krasteva, Director for Innovation, International Cooperation and Sport Directorate-General for Education an Culture of the European Commission.
Find out more: http://www.oecd.org/publications/supporting-entrepreneurship-and-innovation-in-higher-education-in-ireland-9789264270893-en.htm
Bloch - Measuring Innovation in the public sectorinnovationoecd
This document discusses measuring innovation in the public sector. It outlines several surveys conducted since 2008 to measure innovation among public sector organizations, moving away from comparing the public and private sectors to focus on policy-relevant issues for the public sector. The document also discusses policy interests in public sector innovation and future topics for survey research, such as identifying transformative innovations, measuring beneficial outcomes, and linking innovation capabilities to governance models.
Kokeilurahoitus - Mitä tiedetään tänään?Annukka Berg
Kokeilurahoitukseen keskittyvän KORVA-hankkeen kirjallisuuskatsauksen esittely Kokeilukummien verkostolle 26.1.2016. Mukana erilaisten kokeilutyyppien luokat sekä alustavia ehdotuksia Suomen kokeilurahoituksen kehittämissuunnista.
Esityksessä valaistaan Suomen tietä kokeilukulttuurin edistäjäksi ja jaotellaan kokeilut kahden mallin - hallinnon käytössä olevan kolmiomallin ja uuden sipulimallin - mukaan.
Annukka Berg: Mitä jos kokeiltaisiin? - Kokeilukulttuurista uusi toimintatapaGBC Finland
Annukka Bergin esitys GBC Finlandin järjestämässä Rakennetun ympäristön tulevaisuus -seminaarissa 4.11.2013. Tilaisuus oli osa GBC Finlandin, ympäristönministeriön ja RYM Oy:n yhteishanketta.
Experimental Finland_the Finnish model of promoting experimental governanceAnnukka Berg
This presentation tells the story of Experimental Finland, a spearhead project of the government. The chosen approach is analysed and discussed in the light of recent research findings.
Alhola cleantech procurement ippc6_2014-08-15Dr. Paul Davis
Katriina Alhola presented on promoting cleantech in public procurement and investments in Finland. She discussed how the Finnish government has set a goal of directing 1% of annual public procurement spending, or 350 million euros, towards cleantech solutions. Cleantech includes products and technologies that improve resource efficiency, reduce environmental impacts, and compete favorably on price. Alhola outlined several cleantech procurement cases in Finland and recommended that procurers consider life-cycle costs, impacts, and available innovative solutions. She proposed developing an online decision support system to facilitate knowledge sharing and promote cleantech procurement between stakeholders like procurers, suppliers, and experts. The system would provide information on best practices and procurement needs to make cleantech's economic
El 25 de abril de 2017 organizamos en la Fundación Ramón Areces una mesa redonda sobre 'La empresa y las políticas de innovación transformadoras'. En este foro participaron, entre otros, Totti Konnola, CEO de Insight Foresight Institute; Luis Fernando Álvarez-Gascón Pérez, Director General GMV secure eSolutions; y Francisco Marín, Director General del CDTI. Esta actividad se celebró en colaboración con el Grupo de Investigación en Economía y Política de la Innovación de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid (GRINEI-UCM) y el Foro de Empresas Innovadoras (FEI).
Towards ecowelfare state: orchestrating for systemic impacts.ORSI
The document describes a research project called "Towards Eco-Welfare State: Orchestrating for Systemic Impacts" which is studying and developing governance practices to enable a fair transition to a Finnish eco-welfare state by 2025 through impact-driven and participatory governance approaches. The project is funded by the Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland and involves collaboration between universities and research institutions to address challenges of integrating environmental and social policy goals through themes like dynamic public administration and influencing consumption choices.
Theo Roelandt: In Praise of Heroic Policy Making Theo Roelandt
This document summarizes a speech given by Dr. Theo Roelandt on evidence-based policy making. The speech calls for more rigorous impact assessment of policies using experimental and empirical methods. It outlines the speaker's policy impact assessment strategy, which involves developing clear intervention theories, monitoring key indicators, and evaluating policies using randomized controlled trials, natural experiments, and small-scale policy experiments. Examples provided include an evaluation of innovation credits in the Netherlands using a differences-in-differences approach and a behavioral insights experiment on reducing food waste in restaurants. The speech concludes by discussing some of the complexities in applying experimental methods to policy making.
Research needs around politically influenceable factors of climate policy acc...Oeko-Institut
The document discusses research needs around factors that influence public acceptability of climate policy measures. It notes that existing research has limitations, focusing on non-influenceable demographic factors or comparing instruments without improving acceptability. More research is needed on influenceable factors like policy design, timing, participation, and communication framing. Different methods could better study these politically influenceable factors and their impacts.
Kokeilurahoitus - Mitä tiedetään tänään?Annukka Berg
Kokeilurahoitukseen keskittyvän KORVA-hankkeen kirjallisuuskatsauksen esittely Kokeilukummien verkostolle 26.1.2016. Mukana erilaisten kokeilutyyppien luokat sekä alustavia ehdotuksia Suomen kokeilurahoituksen kehittämissuunnista.
Esityksessä valaistaan Suomen tietä kokeilukulttuurin edistäjäksi ja jaotellaan kokeilut kahden mallin - hallinnon käytössä olevan kolmiomallin ja uuden sipulimallin - mukaan.
Annukka Berg: Mitä jos kokeiltaisiin? - Kokeilukulttuurista uusi toimintatapaGBC Finland
Annukka Bergin esitys GBC Finlandin järjestämässä Rakennetun ympäristön tulevaisuus -seminaarissa 4.11.2013. Tilaisuus oli osa GBC Finlandin, ympäristönministeriön ja RYM Oy:n yhteishanketta.
Experimental Finland_the Finnish model of promoting experimental governanceAnnukka Berg
This presentation tells the story of Experimental Finland, a spearhead project of the government. The chosen approach is analysed and discussed in the light of recent research findings.
Alhola cleantech procurement ippc6_2014-08-15Dr. Paul Davis
Katriina Alhola presented on promoting cleantech in public procurement and investments in Finland. She discussed how the Finnish government has set a goal of directing 1% of annual public procurement spending, or 350 million euros, towards cleantech solutions. Cleantech includes products and technologies that improve resource efficiency, reduce environmental impacts, and compete favorably on price. Alhola outlined several cleantech procurement cases in Finland and recommended that procurers consider life-cycle costs, impacts, and available innovative solutions. She proposed developing an online decision support system to facilitate knowledge sharing and promote cleantech procurement between stakeholders like procurers, suppliers, and experts. The system would provide information on best practices and procurement needs to make cleantech's economic
El 25 de abril de 2017 organizamos en la Fundación Ramón Areces una mesa redonda sobre 'La empresa y las políticas de innovación transformadoras'. En este foro participaron, entre otros, Totti Konnola, CEO de Insight Foresight Institute; Luis Fernando Álvarez-Gascón Pérez, Director General GMV secure eSolutions; y Francisco Marín, Director General del CDTI. Esta actividad se celebró en colaboración con el Grupo de Investigación en Economía y Política de la Innovación de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid (GRINEI-UCM) y el Foro de Empresas Innovadoras (FEI).
Towards ecowelfare state: orchestrating for systemic impacts.ORSI
The document describes a research project called "Towards Eco-Welfare State: Orchestrating for Systemic Impacts" which is studying and developing governance practices to enable a fair transition to a Finnish eco-welfare state by 2025 through impact-driven and participatory governance approaches. The project is funded by the Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland and involves collaboration between universities and research institutions to address challenges of integrating environmental and social policy goals through themes like dynamic public administration and influencing consumption choices.
Theo Roelandt: In Praise of Heroic Policy Making Theo Roelandt
This document summarizes a speech given by Dr. Theo Roelandt on evidence-based policy making. The speech calls for more rigorous impact assessment of policies using experimental and empirical methods. It outlines the speaker's policy impact assessment strategy, which involves developing clear intervention theories, monitoring key indicators, and evaluating policies using randomized controlled trials, natural experiments, and small-scale policy experiments. Examples provided include an evaluation of innovation credits in the Netherlands using a differences-in-differences approach and a behavioral insights experiment on reducing food waste in restaurants. The speech concludes by discussing some of the complexities in applying experimental methods to policy making.
Research needs around politically influenceable factors of climate policy acc...Oeko-Institut
The document discusses research needs around factors that influence public acceptability of climate policy measures. It notes that existing research has limitations, focusing on non-influenceable demographic factors or comparing instruments without improving acceptability. More research is needed on influenceable factors like policy design, timing, participation, and communication framing. Different methods could better study these politically influenceable factors and their impacts.
Salazar - Towards more inclusive science and innovations indicatorsinnovationoecd
The document summarizes a panel discussion at the OECD Blue Sky Forum III on developing more inclusive science and innovation indicators. The panelists discussed developing indicators that capture innovation in non-mainstream areas, socially excluded groups, local contexts, and developing world. They also addressed how to measure culture of innovation in a society and promote socially responsible research policies. Suggestions included defining frameworks for new metrics, establishing goals, ensuring replicability, and evaluating impact on policy and society.
ISCN 2016: Working Group 3: Integration of Research, Teaching and FacilitiesISCN_Secretariat
1. Transition UGent is a bottom-up initiative consisting of 250 academics, students, and university staff that aims to make Ghent University more sustainable. It acts as a think tank to suggest sustainability objectives and actions.
2. Transition UGent was started in 2011 and holds transition arenas to discuss visions and opportunities for sustainability. It uses transition management to empower sustainability innovations and work towards long-term change.
3. Some initiatives started by Transition UGent include establishing a sustainability office, an elective sustainability course, and pilot sustainability projects led by staff and students. Transition UGent has helped place sustainability higher on the university's agenda but faces challenges in agenda setting and resistance to changes in research
The document discusses the EEB's plans to develop a "Blueprint for European Sustainable Consumption and Production" along with other organizations. The blueprint will outline a vision for more sustainable lives in Europe by 2030, identify goals and priorities, and propose short, medium, and long-term actions across different levels from implementation to changing mindsets. It is intended to help drive the sustainable development debate and agenda within the EU.
The transforming methods of collaboration and social work practice researchSocca_osaamiskeskus
This document discusses social work practice research in Finland. It begins by providing background on the need for clinical training in social work education and the founding of the Heikki Waris Institute in 2000 to combine social work practice transformation, research, and education. The Institute aims to produce knowledge arising from practice through co-development, co-research, and co-learning among various collaboration partners. Methods like experimenting and prototyping are discussed. Findings show collaborative knowledge creation with clients can be empowering and impact professionals. The challenges of teaching practice research to social work students in a collaborative way are also examined.
Inuse seminar, Oct 17 2013, Holopaineninuseproject
This document summarizes a research project that explored service innovation from the perspectives of providers and customers. The project involved interviews with 65 employees and customers of five new services. The research questions examined how customer experiences of a new service differed from the official company view and employee experiences, and what benefits and challenges were perceived by customers and employees. The interviews were analyzed thematically using narratives, critical events, and metaphors. Theoretical lenses included phenomenology, service-dominant logic, narrative theory, and cultural marketing. One study presented at EGOS compared the narratives around a new insurance e-service from the corporate, employee, and customer perspectives.
Jordi Molas Gallart-La empresa y las políticas de innovación transformadorasFundación Ramón Areces
El 25 de abril de 2017 organizamos en la Fundación Ramón Areces una mesa redonda sobre 'La empresa y las políticas de innovación transformadoras'. En este foro participaron, entre otros, Totti Konnola, CEO de Insight Foresight Institute; Luis Fernando Álvarez-Gascón Pérez, Director General GMV secure eSolutions; y Francisco Marín, Director General del CDTI. Esta actividad se celebró en colaboración con el Grupo de Investigación en Economía y Política de la Innovación de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid (GRINEI-UCM) y el Foro de Empresas Innovadoras (FEI).
Rémi Quirion, Chief Scientist of Québec, discusses social innovation and the future of higher education. As Chief Scientist, he advises the government on research strategy and chairs boards that fund intersectoral research on major societal challenges. The three Fonds de recherche du Québec support research, training, and knowledge mobilization. Examples of knowledge mobilization centers focus on social issues. The FRQ also supports innovative social practices through strategic clusters, research teams, and Actions concertées programs that foster co-creation with partners. Looking ahead, Quirion suggests increasing social innovation training and focusing research on challenges like demographic changes, the labor market, sustainability, and measuring social impact. Key will be
This document outlines the subtasks of Task XXIV, which focuses on behavior change in demand-side management. It lists 5 subtasks: 1) a helicopter view of models, frameworks, case studies and metrics; 2) in-depth analysis in key areas like buildings, transport, and smart metering; 3) an evaluation tool for stakeholders; 4) country-specific project ideas and pilot projects; and 5) an expert platform. It also provides examples of case studies collected in areas of smart metering/feedback, building retrofits, SME initiatives, and mobility programs. The case studies are categorized based on the country, domain, theories/models used, types of behaviors addressed, and focus areas like individual behavior or
Ulrik Jørgensen presents on sustainability education at Aalborg University and the DIST center. The university focuses on project-based learning and has campuses in Copenhagen and Esbjerg. DIST engages in research and outreach on socio-material perspectives of sustainability challenges like climate change, resource use, growth, and social conflicts. Educational programs explore sustainable design, cities, and transitions to impact professional practices and societal strategies. Sustainability presents challenges to university disciplines and the structure of professions and knowledge.
Tuula Jäppinen, Essi Kuure and Satu Miettinen, Designing Local reform of Comm...LabGov
Tuula Jäppinen (Dr. Administrative Sciences)
Senior Adviser, The Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities, Helsinki, Finland
Essi Kuure (Industrial Designer, M.A.)
Junior Researcher, University of Lapland, Culture-based Service Design Doctoral School, Rovaniemi, Finland
Satu Miettinen (Dr. of Arts)
Professor of Applied Art and Design, University of Lapland, Faculty of Art and Design, Rovaniemi, Finland
This document summarizes three literature sources on innovation in the public sector:
1) The first source discusses five strategies for encouraging innovation in government: cultivating employee ideas, replicating innovations from other contexts, partnering across sectors, networking broadly, and using open source models.
2) The second source defines types of innovation and outlines a framework for generating ideas, incubating prototypes, replicating successes, and evaluating impacts. It emphasizes generating diversity of thought and learning from networks.
3) The third source discusses defining innovation to include new processes and services. It outlines four principles for public sector innovation strategies: co-design, collaborative service models, embracing technology, and experimentation. It recommends an EU call for
Similar to 20151119 an experimental culture in the making yhys annukka berg (20)
Polku2030 - Suomen kestävän kehityksen politiikan arviointiAnnukka Berg
Mihin kysymyksiin Suomen kestävän kehityksen politiikan tulisi keskittyä? Minkä kouluarvosanan asiantuntijat antavat Suomelle kestävyyden edistäjänä? Missä ovat politiikan vahvuudet, haasteet ja kehittämisen paikat?
Mitä ilmastonmuutos tarkoittaa lähitulevaisuudelle? Miksi meidän pitäisi itse asiassa puhua globaalista ympäristökriisistä? Ja miten tämän valtavan haasteen kanssa voisi elää hyvää elämää myös ruuhkavuosien keskellä? Esitys sisältää paitsi tutkittua tietoa myös omia kokemuksia aiheen parissa työskentelystä, sen inhimillisestä merkityksestä ja omista pyrkimyksistä muuttaa kulutuskäyttäytymistä.
Kiertotalous - kohti resurssiviisaampaa talouttaAnnukka Berg
Mitä kiertotalous tarkoittaa, ja miksi sitä tarvitaan? Minkälaisia politiikkatoimia siirtymä kohti kiertotaloutta vaatii? Minkälaisia liiketoimintamalleja kaivataan? Ja mitkä maat toimivat muutoksen etunenässä?
Kokeilujen arviointia ruotiva esitys, joka pidettiin Kokeilevan Suomen, Suomen Arviointiyhdistyksen ja hallinnon epävirallisen arviointiverkoston aamukahveilla 1.3.2018. Esityksen punaisena lankana on kokeilujen erilaisten käyttötapojen luokittelu sekä erilaisten arviointitapojen sovittaminen näihin funktioihin. Esimerkkeinä käytetään erityisesti ilmastonmuutoksen hallintaan ja resurssiviisauden edistämiseen liittyviä kokeiluja.
Degrowth - three things to learn about the economy and the stories told about itAnnukka Berg
The document discusses the need to rethink economic growth assumptions due to ecological, social, and economic reasons. It presents three key points about degrowth: (1) It is a critical view of growth-bound economies and cultures, not necessarily a strategy for economic downturn; (2) While growth critique is common in Finland, alternatives are poorly defined; (3) Telling new stories about the economy through scenarios, experiments, and narratives can help shape reality away from growth dependence. The document argues for constructing non-growth economic narratives and pioneering alternatives already happening on a small scale.
Food safety, prepare for the unexpected - So what can be done in order to be ready to address food safety, food Consumers, food producers and manufacturers, food transporters, food businesses, food retailers can ...
This report explores the significance of border towns and spaces for strengthening responses to young people on the move. In particular it explores the linkages of young people to local service centres with the aim of further developing service, protection, and support strategies for migrant children in border areas across the region. The report is based on a small-scale fieldwork study in the border towns of Chipata and Katete in Zambia conducted in July 2023. Border towns and spaces provide a rich source of information about issues related to the informal or irregular movement of young people across borders, including smuggling and trafficking. They can help build a picture of the nature and scope of the type of movement young migrants undertake and also the forms of protection available to them. Border towns and spaces also provide a lens through which we can better understand the vulnerabilities of young people on the move and, critically, the strategies they use to navigate challenges and access support.
The findings in this report highlight some of the key factors shaping the experiences and vulnerabilities of young people on the move – particularly their proximity to border spaces and how this affects the risks that they face. The report describes strategies that young people on the move employ to remain below the radar of visibility to state and non-state actors due to fear of arrest, detention, and deportation while also trying to keep themselves safe and access support in border towns. These strategies of (in)visibility provide a way to protect themselves yet at the same time also heighten some of the risks young people face as their vulnerabilities are not always recognised by those who could offer support.
In this report we show that the realities and challenges of life and migration in this region and in Zambia need to be better understood for support to be strengthened and tuned to meet the specific needs of young people on the move. This includes understanding the role of state and non-state stakeholders, the impact of laws and policies and, critically, the experiences of the young people themselves. We provide recommendations for immediate action, recommendations for programming to support young people on the move in the two towns that would reduce risk for young people in this area, and recommendations for longer term policy advocacy.
Preliminary findings _OECD field visits to ten regions in the TSI EU mining r...OECDregions
Preliminary findings from OECD field visits for the project: Enhancing EU Mining Regional Ecosystems to Support the Green Transition and Secure Mineral Raw Materials Supply.
About Potato, The scientific name of the plant is Solanum tuberosum (L).Christina Parmionova
The potato is a starchy root vegetable native to the Americas that is consumed as a staple food in many parts of the world. Potatoes are tubers of the plant Solanum tuberosum, a perennial in the nightshade family Solanaceae. Wild potato species can be found from the southern United States to southern Chile
Synopsis (short abstract) In December 2023, the UN General Assembly proclaimed 30 May as the International Day of Potato.
RFP for Reno's Community Assistance CenterThis Is Reno
Property appraisals completed in May for downtown Reno’s Community Assistance and Triage Centers (CAC) reveal that repairing the buildings to bring them back into service would cost an estimated $10.1 million—nearly four times the amount previously reported by city staff.
UN WOD 2024 will take us on a journey of discovery through the ocean's vastness, tapping into the wisdom and expertise of global policy-makers, scientists, managers, thought leaders, and artists to awaken new depths of understanding, compassion, collaboration and commitment for the ocean and all it sustains. The program will expand our perspectives and appreciation for our blue planet, build new foundations for our relationship to the ocean, and ignite a wave of action toward necessary change.
State crafting: Changes and challenges for managing the public finances
20151119 an experimental culture in the making yhys annukka berg
1. An experimental culture
in the making?
Uses of sustainability experiments
& the case Finland
Annukka Berg (D.Soc.Sc.)
SYKE, Environmental Policy Centre
YHYS Fall Colloquium, November 19-20, 2015
2. The structure of the
presentation
2
● Sustainability experiments
○ Definitions
○ Use categories
● A short history of Finland’s quest to
become an experimentalist society
● How to approach the promotion
experimental culture in Finland? –
applying the use categories
3. 3
Disclaimer:
This presentation includes thinking-in-
progress and notes about a process that is
currently taking place. Thus, comments are
welcome and floor is open for discussion.
5. Why sustainability
experiments matter to me?
5
● PhD on national sustainable
consumption and production
programmes (2006-2012)
○ Frustration
● Stockholm’s congestion charge
experiment (2005-2006)
● Well evaluated
● Communal referendum
● The haunting question: What if all the
limited resources driving
sustainability would be directed to
action?
● A side-project since 2008
6. ● In the recent literature, defined in various ways (see e.g.
Bulkeley & Castán Broto 2013; Kivimaa et al. 2015;
Berkhout et al. 2010)
○ Sustainability experiments have multiple faces
● A minimalistic definition:
(1) A concrete act that is
(2) novel (in its context),
(3) temporary (restricted space and scale) and
(4) reversible (open to failure) and
(5) the outcomes of which are not known beforehand
● Other typical features: involves a network of actors,
fosters learning, seeks to contribute to broader societal
development (directional)
6
Sustainability experiments
7. “The three rights” of
experimental culture
- A popular definition
7
(1) The right to act
(2) The right to plan less
(3) The right to fail
-> Taking (restricted) action/steps
even though consensus, resources,
and knowledge would be lacking
-> Experimentation essentially about
learning by doing
-> Can be contrasted with
deliberating, studying or planning
a case/question
8. ● The idea: to take into account that sustainability
experiments a institutionally ambiguous form of
governance (Hajer 2003)
○ Open-minded policy analysis process: what is
meaningful and legitimate?
● Actors use (the opportunities provided by) sustainability
experiments for various purposes
○ Can be categorized: framing experiments from use
perspective
○ Knowledge use literature (e.g. Hawe et al 2009)
8
The use perspective
to sustainability experiments
9. ● An article on analysing Finland’s sustainable consumption
and production programme from use perspective (Berg &
Hukkinen 2011). Use categories:
(1) scripted/instrumental;
(2) deliberative/conceptual;
(3) political/tactical;
(4) ritual;
(5) unprompted/unanticipated
● Categories partly overlapping -> for analysing
experiments, need to add more
● A case study of resource-wise experiments of Jyväskylä
(Berg & al. 2014) + a literature review -> later on: a meta-
study 9
The development of use categories for
sustainability experiments
10. Uses of sustainability experiments
1. Instrumental use
10
● Experimentation as a test
case/field trial
○ Practical information on “what
works”
● The most conventional
understanding of experimental
governance
● The perspective of policy
experiments (e.g. Jowell 2003)
○ Key questions: rigid design and
evaluation, e.g. reliability and
validity
11. Uses of sustainability experiments
2. Conceptual/deliberative use
11
● Experimentation as a tool to foster
higher order/conceptual learning –
on individual and group levels
○ “Assumptions, norms, interpretive frames
which govern the decision-making process
and actions” (Brown & Vergragt 2008)
● A key theme in the SE literature
● The perspective of policy learning and
deliberative democracy
○ Key questions e.g. organizing the
experiment around learning,
creating open networks and safe
spaces, communicating to various
audiences (Bos et al. unpublished)
12. Uses of sustainability experiments
3. Political use
12
● Experimentation as a political act, e.g.:
○ A way to bring about, strengthen or
weaken politically meaningful
symbols, emblems, stories and
discourses
○ A way to silent voices or mask general
inaction
● A viewpoint less frequently addressed
in the SE literature
● The perspective of (symbolic) politics
(e.g. Edelman 1964)
○ Key questions e.g. the potential
ritual features of an experiment; the
power to bring about strong political
symbols/discourses
13. Uses of sustainability experiments
4. “Practice change” use
13
● Experimentation as a way to
change routines, habits and
practices (of everyday lives)
● A viewpoint addressed unevenly in
the SE literature
● The perspective of sustainable
consumption literature,
marketing and practice theory –
also living laboratories
○ Key questions e.g. how personal
experiences and the ability to
sense things affect behaviour;
what is the role of learning by
doing and concrete nudges in
changing habits
14. Uses of sustainability experiments
5. Managerial use
14
● Experimentation as a way to
manage change and to accumulate
resources for a cause
○ Networks, knowledge, stories,
publicity, money
● A viewpoint less addressed in the
SE literature
● Yet, a key for business thinking on
experimentation (Tuulenmäki 2010)
○ Key questions e.g. the optimal
and innovative design and timing
of experiments to maximise
resources in use
15. Uses of sustainability experiments
6. Systemic use
15
● Experimentation as a driver for
systemic change
○ socio-technical, socio-ecological etc
● A perspective frequently used in the
SE literature
● The perspective of sustainability
transitions literature – but also other
e.g. sector-specific framings possible
○ Key questions e.g. the role of
experimentation in niche and market
creation, spatial development and
societal problem solving (Kivimaa et al
2015); the possibilities for experiments
to deepen, scale up and broaden
16. 16
A short history of Finland’s
quest to become an
experimentalist society
17. ● The Foresight Reports of the Prime Minister’s Office
○ On energy and climate policy (2009)
○ On sustainable growth and well-being (2013)
● In the legislature 2011 - 2015, Juha Sipilä the vice-chair of
the Parliament’s Committee for the Future
○ Hearing and a study process on experimental culture
17
Seeds planted -
Foresight Reports & Parliament’s
Committee for the Future
18. ● Ideas on experimental culture met with enthusiasm
across political party lines
○ A way to shift from stagnation/(mere) planning to
action
○ Combatting extensive “normative burden”
○ Supporting civic engagement
● In the background
○ Frustration for the unability to solve the great
challenges of our time: economic crisis, social and
health care reform (SOTE), climate change…
○ Diminishing powers of the Parliament?
18
Hearings in Parliament’s
Committee for the Future 2012
19. “Time to Experiment!” - A report
19
● A study: “Time to experiment!
– Finland on its way to become
an experimentalist
society”(Berg, 2013)
● Based on interviews with 14
Finnish experts from e.g.
Tekes, Sitra, Aalto University +
14 case studies
○ An environmental focus
● Presented in a press
conference chaired by Juha
Sipilä in the spring 2013
20. ”Time to Experiment!” – Key
recommendations
20
● An office/ombudsman for
experimentation and
innovation
● High profile
experimentation hubs
● Seed money
● Councelling services
● A program
21. ● Sitra: Various experiments and the quest to promote
experimental culture
● Tekes: experimentation a key theme e.g. in the innovation
research call of 2013
● Ministry of the Environment & Ministry of Transport and
Communications: Sustainable consumption and
production experiments & Traffic Lab
● Valo: the idea to use experimentation as a way to make the
whole nation exercise by 2017
-> On international level, e.g. increasing urban experiments,
living labs and transition experiments + literature on the topic21
Other pioneering work in
Finland (examples)
22. “A culture of experimentation will be introduced
Experimentation will aim at innovative solutions,
improvements in services, the promotion of individual initiative
and entrepreneurship, and the strengthening of regional and
local decision-making and cooperation. Experiments will make
use of citizen-driven operating practices…”
22
Programme of Prime Minister
Sipilä's Government (Chapter 8, p. 28)
23. ● An experimentation programme, including extensive trials
and several smaller experiments, will be implemented.
● Systematic experimentation will be introduced and a legal
basis will be created to make the arrangement of
experiments easier.
● Experimentation will reduce response times and improve
anticipation during the process of solving social problems,
and the Government’s strategic aims will be promoted.
23
Programme of Prime Minister
Sipilä's Government (Chapter 8, p. 28)
24. 24
The triangle model of
experiments
Governments strategic
experiments:
- Relatively few
- Aim at developing
governments policies
- Well designed and
evaluated
Experimentation hubs:
- 10-100?
- For various purposes:
research, technological
and service innovation,
governance practices
- Design and evaluation as
pragmatic for the actors?
- By redirecting resources?
Grassroots experimentation:
- Everywhere: workplaces, NGOs,
individual citizens…
- Aim at developing their own
operations and the society around
(grassroots innovations!)
- Light design and evaluation
- Need for small seed money?
26. A participative process
26
● Minister Anu Vehviläinen
leads the process together
with the Minister group on
public reforms
● So far, two expert
workshops including
officials from different
ministries
● The Parliament of Finland
informed and consulted in a
special hearing
○ Parliamentary
Adivisory Council
27. The next steps
27
● Plans to establish an “office” to
promote experimentation
○ Part of the Prime Minister’s
Office
● A project to find out whether
there should be a special fund
for experiments, and if so, what
kind of design it should have
○ SYKE takes part
● The design process started on
the basic income experiment
28. How to approach the
promotion of experimental
culture in Finland? 28
29. Discussing the 6 uses - case Finland
1. Instrumental use
29
● Particularly governments strategic
experiments
● Practical ideas: Scientific advice
for the government; a resource kit
for those wanting to test an idea
with max. reliability and validity (c.f.
Jowell 2003)
● Critical questions: the rigidity of
design and evaluation of
experiments; the over-use of the
instrumental perspective
30. Discussing the 6 uses - case Finland
2. Conceptual/deliberative use
30
● All experiments
● Practical ideas: A check-list of design
factors that nurture learning through
experimentation (e.g. Bos et al.
unpublished); networking &
communicating success stories
● Critical questions: contents of the
learning agenda; participation
31. Discussing the 6 uses - case Finland
3. Political use
31
● All experiments, particularly
governments strategic exp.
● Practical ideas: Supporting
experiments that can act as
symbols/emblems in politicized
questions; rising and silencing political
debates by exp.
● Critical questions: understanding that all
experimentation potentially political; re-
considering the design of exp.,
e.g.inclusions/exclusions
32. Discussing the 6 uses - case Finland
4. “Practice change” use
32
● All experiments, particularly
grassroots experiments
● Practical ideas: Resource kit for
using personal trials and
nudging to support changes in
everyday practices and
consumption patterns
● Critical questions: The
paternalism of the approach
33. Discussing the 6 uses - case Finland
5. Managerial use
33
● All - but particularly grassroots
experiments and experimentation
hubs
● Practical ideas: A resource kit (incl.
communications material) and
educational program for those
managing experiments; including the
viewpoint in the financing
mechanisms (a stepwise approach)
● Critical questions: seeing the
multiple faces of experiments
34. Discussing the 6 uses - case Finland
6. Systemic use
34
● All experiments - but different
dynamics on different levels
● Practical ideas: political, financial and
specialist support (e.g. legal advice)
to niche level; feedback-mechanisms
to regime level on e.g. barriers to
action
● Critical questions: risk of scattered
action; the over-use of systemic
perspective
36. ● Should there be a special fund for experiments? If so, how
should it look like?
● On the basis of studies done so far, it seems that there
would be the need for (Berg 2013; Berg et al 2014)
○ Easy-to-get seed money for grassroots
○ Redirecting existing resources to support
experimentation hubs
● A three step co-creation process with major stakeholders
○ (1) The challenges and possibilities experienced in
the field; (2) The possible models of funding exp.; (3)
The implementation of the chosen model
○ Syke & Demos Helsinki (2015-2016)
36
Current SYKE projects - KORVA:
A co-creation process on the
funding of experiments
37. ● Start-up companies and co-creation communities as
ecosystems for ecoinnovations
○ 2014- 2016
○ Syke, Aalto University, Altonova Oy, Tekes
● Proposals to promote eco-innovations by
experimentation
○ Eco-innovations high on the agenda of the
“experimentation office” of the Prime Minister’s Office
○ Experimentation hubs where actors could co-operate
by setting ambitious goals
○ Increased public risk financing for companies
○ Networks for learning
37
Current SYKE projects - SCINNO:
Experimentation as a way to foster fruitful
ecosystems for ecoinnovations
38. What is most fascinating in
experimenting?
38
● The possibilities/limits of
sustainability experiments to
change things on different
levels
○ Multiple faces
● Understanding how people
and societies are able to take
up new things?
○ Learning by doing
something fundamental
● Experimentation not new but
rather old
- Learning is here assumed to include higher order learning (Brown and Vergragt 2008), such as changes in the assumptions, norms and interpretive frames. The new networks and practices are assumed to play significant roles in different levels and contexts also beyond the single experiment. Likewise symbolic embodiments and iconic examples and stories are expected to serve policy processes also in other contexts.
Reflexivity in regulation takes many forms. Reflexive elements in legal systems can be found in regulatory goals, structures, methods and processes (Arnold and Gunderson 2013).
Finally we assume that various legal factors, like requirements of precision of law, predictability and legal security, limit the adoption of reflexive regulation in its pure form.
Kova suunnittelemaan -> Halu perehtyä väikkärissä laajoihin kansallisiin strategioihin -> tausta ympäristöpolitiikassa: kestävän kulutuksen ja tuotannon ohjelmat Suomessa ja muutamassa verrokkimaassa -> mahd. perehtyä rakennemuutoksen synnyttämiseen -> tarpeen paitsi ympäristöpuolella myös sosiaali- ja terveysalalla -> suunnitelmana edetä nopeasti -> pari vuotta ahkerasti töitä -> esittelin alustavia tuloksia, mm. että nämä laajat ohjelmat olivat tuottaneet melko vähän tuloksia suhteessa niihin odotuksiin, joita niihin oli ladattu -> Vanhemman tutkijan kritiikki: kaikki tietävät, että asia on näin -> Järkytys -> Johti uusille urille -> Etsimään vaihtoehtoisia tapoja edetä tilanteissa, joissa (rakenteellisen) muutoksen tarve on vahva, mutta siihen ei ehkä ole tahtoa ja/tai resursseja -> Kokeileva kehittäminen
Idea: comparing experimentaö culture with some other possible cultures of developing